Low IQ Antisemitism?

1:42Ian MalcolmWell, alright. We will, hopefully. There we go, perfect timing, Joann. well, alright, to everybody that is out there, all, all handful of individuals that might find this topic of interest. I, I would love if people could share out the space, and I would love even more if, X would allow us to have a conversation without cutting out the audio to everybody that is in the listener panel.↗

2:14Ian MalcolmI can't believe, and, if, if we see similar, I've decided that what we'll probably do is we'll have to start launching spaces going forward, perhaps from either Joanne's handle or from others, then I'll just join as a speaker because the Insane amount of suppression and censorship that they're putting on my handle merely for holding spaces is getting to the point of comedy. I got multiple messages yesterday in the space that we ran, we had up to, I think eight or nine hundred people in there. at one point we had like twenty-five thousand that came through the space, which is really humbling, and yet we had not even dozens. There, there were probably at least a hundred comments in the purple pill, maybe dozens of messages sent to me directly Correctly saying that people were incapable of listening to the space for more than thirty seconds, a minute, five minutes without the audio cutting out, and that they were going to other spaces and not having that happen. And so it seems pretty obvious to me that X is really concerned and they're tinkering around with, either the backend, or that perhaps they just have some strange device or internet connectivity that, that doesn't work as everybody else does, which I find very difficult to believe. Which actually is kind of a curious segue to come to the topic that I wanted to discuss. This idea of low IQ antisemitism, I almost intentionally misspelled the word, maybe with some Z's, maybe, maybe, maybe, you know, throw, throw weird, exclamation points at the end, at the beginning, all throughout, just to, to further hammer home the point here. and the reason that I wanna talk about this is because it's a subject, it's a, it's a quip, if you will, that was made by Nick Fuentes at one point. and today I was disappointed to see, and I don't know if this is tongue in cheek, disappointed to see what I think was, Keith Woods, who I have a lot of admiration for. I think he does a lot of wonderful work. I think he is a, a high IQ individual. and I look forward to one day, hopefully having him in a space to talk about some of these realities and some of the, the patterns that I've seen to stumble upon. And I say that because I, I admire a lot of his work, but he put out a post, and I will, in fact, I'll just pull it up directly. This isn't-- By the way, I want to be very clear, this isn't a shot at Kim as an individual by any means.↗

4:50Ian MalcolmBut he said so, people might have seen. There is a video that's flying around that has Andrew Tate, and, in this video, I'll just read off the headline that Keithwood shared. It says, "Andrew Tate explains the reason to why so many people are blaming Jews for everything." And it says, "Quote, I don't think it matters what Israel does." And then, "Quote." When you have all these young men out there who have no hope in building a good life, they will find someone to blame.↗

5:27Ian MalcolmThat is Andrew Tate. Now, it was shared by Keith Woods, who said, "Brokey goyim blame the model minority because they're jealous of their success." Jordan Peterson talks about this. Now, I'll put this up into the nest. Now he used the term Brokey Goyim, and, I'm not sure if he's mocking Andrew Tate, and maybe he is. And, and if that's the case, then I think my response either way, whether it's sarcasm or not, it is an appropriate response that I've shared. And the reason I wanna bring attention to this is because this suggestion from Andrew Tate That if you, if you are, let's say, I'm gonna put it in his crude language, if you suck at life, you're gonna find somebody to blame it on. Perhaps that's what Andrew Tate wants to suggest with this, what I would think is a mockery of people that are frustrated in modernity.↗

6:29Ian MalcolmBut let's think about this, I've, I've often made comparisons. If you are the fish and you're swimming in the toxic fishbowl, is it reasonable to be upset? About the toxicity. I think it is. I think it's also unreasonable to think that the solution to the fish that is struggling to live in the toxic water is to medicate the fish into being able to handle that water. Right? It's far more reasonable to say, "Why don't we get the toxin out of the water so that the fish can live happier?"↗

7:03Ian MalcolmAnd if we look at the world in which we live right now, there are a lot of reasons to be very frustrated if you are in the West. Now, it doesn't matter if you are five, if you are twenty-five, if you are fifty-five, or if you are ninety-five years old. If we're gonna honestly look at the course of the last couple decades, it's pretty reasonable to suggest that anybody in any of those age brackets is probably going to be living a life today that isn't on parity with what that ninety-five-year-old probably would have envisioned just twenty or thirty or forty years ago.↗

7:40Ian MalcolmTheir future state, and we can stay fixated on that ninety-five-year-old Because if we were to think of an individual that perhaps was a young man who went and fought in World War II, believing that he was fighting for a, a better tomorrow for his family, well, what would those World War II soldiers think if they looked around at the world today?↗

8:05Ian MalcolmDo you think that they would envision this as the utopia that they watch their friends bleed, if not die on the battlefield, to try and, and bring about? Do you think this is what they want for their grandchildren? Do you think that individual that lost maybe his friend in his arms, as the man bled out on a battlefield, as tears rolled down his eyes, do you think he looks around at the life that might be available to his great-grandchild and thinks, "Yeah, that's, that's, that's, that's what I fought for"? I think that's unreasonable to think or to suggest. Because it was just a generation or two or three ago that your middle class lifestyle in the Western world included a home, included a car. It didn't include endless throwaway garbage clothes and garbage food. No, quite to the contrary. It perhaps included locally grown fruits and vegetables and meats, milk perhaps that was brought to their doorstep by a, a member of their community that they loved, that they cared for, that they said hello to.↗

9:10Ian MalcolmAnd now instead you have things delivered via Walmart by Uber, brought to you likely by an individual who not only doesn't share your culture, he likely hasn't even been in the country for more than a year or two or three or five. How drastically and radically have things changed? That five-year-old that we talked about, metaphorically speaking, he's now eating that Uber Eats delivery or the groceries brought via Walmart that probably have all kinds of chemicals and poisons in them. Also that he can wake up, go to a local public school in which he might be a minority in his own country, potentially even surrounded by individuals that barely even speak English, that just came across the border because his politicians weaponized mass migration against his lifestyle.↗

9:58Ian MalcolmHe's going to grow up in a society where there are fewer and fewer jobs because they've been outsourced to the third world. Fewer and fewer jobs because AI and technology is rapidly taking those. And even if he was able to get a job, well, he's got hyperinflated dollars due to the federal government that seems to be hell-bent on spending every last ounce of poverty or prosperity↗

10:22Ian Malcolmto the Middle East. So even if he is able to get a job Lower class job, middle class job, even an upper class job. He's probably gonna struggle to be able to put a roof over his head, healthy food in front of his family, and that's if he even has a family. Because if we look at the realities of that, well, is that five-year-old probably even gonna be able to have a nuclear family in twenty years, in thirty years? Or is he probably gonna find himself in a society where pornography has been normalized to the point it is on every television network?↗

10:58Ian MalcolmAnd even if he does, so now he's got that going on, he goes down to his smartphone, he tries to go on the latest iteration of Bumble to maybe try and find a woman who put herself on OnlyFans what, at eighteen, like we were talking about yesterday, with the bop house, or in this future dystopia we're envisioning? Have the laws around that also been completely changed? Will it be normalized for the girl at fifteen, twelve, eight, I don't even know? We can look at the Talmud. How low is too low to the overlords that run all of the AI that push out all of the porn?↗

11:33Ian MalcolmWhere would they want this future to go? Is that one that you want for your kids or for your loved ones? Is that the future or the present that that ninety-five year old who fought on the battlefield, that he wished to bring about? Is it unreasonable to question the destruction of your society if you were on a boat and there are people on it intentionally sabotaging that vessel while meanwhile taking all of the wealth and the goods and the prosperity and sending it all over to another boat that's off in the distance for the benefit of their people? Are you allowed to be upset about that?↗

12:12Ian MalcolmIs it reasonable to suggest that people that are on that boat that is sinking each and every moment, is it reasonable for them to be upset about that? Is it reasonable for them to look around and say, "You know what? I'm working two or three times harder than people a generation ago, and my dollars and my wealth that I'm building aren't going a tenth as far."↗

12:34Ian MalcolmIs that a reasonable thing to complain about? Is it reasonable to suggest that local communities being destroyed, that Main Street businesses being wiped out during COVID, whether it was restaurants or barbers or a hardware store, as they watch as their society is completely retrofitted? For the exclusive benefit of the WalMarts of the world and the other Fortune five hundred companies, that they will never have a chance to be able to compete with in terms of quantity of scale. Is it reasonable for them to notice those changes, those differences, which, oh, by the way, are largely being driven by companies that don't have to compete in a fair fashion? And if you think that's an unreasonable suggestion, does Amazon compete fairly when for fifteen years it couldn't develop a profit at all? Operated on a deficit, and why? 'Cause big money pumped and poured its way in there. So even if that business made nothing, it was able to stay afloat. Now, why? I would suggest, because it's all by design. Because by killing the small businesses and the mid-sized businesses, you're able to only have the biggest of businesses that you won't be able to have a job in if you speak out against the ownership and the power structure in which they thrive. That seems all by design. Is it reasonable to be frustrated by that? When you're not living in a free market, you don't live in a society that perhaps values intellect or capability or skill that certainly doesn't, let's say, validate or pro- give some kind of credence to those that are pushing for that which is good. If you put out degeneracy, if you put out evil If you put out that which is vile, pornographic, well, you can get all the shekels in the world, and isn't it ironic speaking of those subjects? Because who is it that's mocking others that perhaps have not found their success and therefore are looking for somebody to blame? Isn't it ironic that it's Andrew Tate, who, if I'm not mistaken, was literally running a cam girl site, who's been accused of, if I'm not mistaken, sexual assault?↗

14:48Ian MalcolmWho then opened his online little store where he would sell his suggestions on how to be a top G. What does top G even stand for? Is it top goyim? Are you the top shill for the Jews, Andrew Tate? Is that your role? Are you proud that you got mobugutti as you push out degeneracy? And I'll give the guy credit where it's deserved. There are some points that he makes that are reasonable. And on this little video, the, the outing, the nightlife, if you will, with Myron and Nick and all these other folks, the Tates included, Andrew Tate said, "Look, they put on a song in the club, I kinda stood there uncomfortably, I didn't dance around to it. That's not on me." And I even commented, "I said, I don't like Andrew Tate," he blocked me. But that's a reasonable comment. You're not guilty of the sins of your friends. That's a reasonable thing to say. But it's unreasonable for this guy to suggest that there is a growing animosity simply because people are looking for someone to blame. That is not correct. In that boat analogy, as the boat is sinking and as the passengers at the bottom of the boat are noticing that their rooms, their quarters in which they're supposed to sleep, are flooding with water, it's unreasonable to suggest that they should just, they should just work harder, and then they wouldn't have to be upset with the In fact, the boat's taken on the water. That's ridiculous.↗

16:15Ian MalcolmYou can't just eternally tread water in a society that hates you, where the people that are in charge are just spraying you like you're trying out for the Navy Seals as you try and tread water. It's unreasonable. And the society back to that analogy for anybody that's familiar with those programs Imagine that you are trying to tread water blindfolded, as you're getting pelted by a hose anytime you put your head above the water, as there are people underneath it continuously punching you in the side. That is modernity. 'Cause it's not enough that you're trying to economically just stay afloat in the system that in many ways is cheating left, right, and center, but you're also continuously bombarded with demoralization and endless propag- propaganda designed to purely bring you down. To make you feel defeated, to make you feel demoralized, to give you the impression that you can't fight for a better tomorrow. That's what this system is doing. So Andrew Tate can sit there and say he's teaching men how to be tough,↗

17:17Ian Malcolmbut is there anything really tough about pushing the degeneracy, the pornography, the worldviews that this guy has, and then when the people are looking around and are feeling kind of down, to say, "Don't, don't consider blaming anybody." That's low IQ antisemitism, I suppose. Now, who would share a message like that? Is it the top Goyim? With his little, his wizard rabbi, I think they refer to him. I think it's Iggy something, Iggy Mershaw or something along those lines. Literally refer to him. Let me, let me grab the exact screenshot. I don't wanna misrepresent Mr. Iggy here. So the exact way that Grok would describe this guy. Iggy, often referred to as Iggy Semelwize or Iggy Semelwissis, is the online alias of Miles Sonkin, sometimes spelled Miles Sonkin or Miles Gary Sonkin. Key figure closely associated with Andrew Tate, widely described in investigative reporting, particularly a BBC investigation in twenty twenty-three. He is a senior leader Of the intellectual driving force behind Andrew Tate's exclusive paid membership network entitled The War Room, which is an all-male group charging high fees for access, advice, and networking. He is considered Tate's right-hand man, also considered his mentor, or I kid you not, quote, "wizard." He is the spiritual advisor to Tate and the organization. Someone who allegedly provides guidance on manipulation tactics, including methods to isolate and control women, as alleged in leaked war room chats reported by the BBC. That is the wizard, who is the weird, strange individual dressed in some of these photos over the shoulder of Andrew Tate. Now, it's totally fine for him to sit there and say that losers wanna blame somebody. I'm reminded of the quote from, we were talking about The Rock, the movie, not the actor or the pro wrestler. We're talking about the movie The Rock the other day with Uncensored, and Sean Connery has the famous line, "Your best?↗

19:37Ian MalcolmLosers give their best, winners go home and f the prom queen." I think is the exact quote from, Sean Connery, something along those lines. Right? The losers complain, they talk about their best, all that kind of stuff. I can agree with that to some extent. You need to wake up, put your foot in front of the other every single day, make the most of yourself, make the most of your mind, make the most of your body, your capabilities, your spirit, your soul. Those are all very good things. You can't sit on the couch forever and blame your increasing waistline. On the fact that merely society is going down the tubes. I can agree to that.↗

20:21Ian MalcolmBut you should also recognize that if you live in a society where you're trying to make the best of yourself each and every day, you do get up, you do go to the gym, you do educate your mind, you do focus on your spirituality, you do put yourself into the economic engine, and you try to make the most of your abilities.↗

20:38Ian MalcolmIf you're doing all those things and at every turn On the economic engine, you are having hiring practices weaponized against you because of the color of your skin. You go to the gym and you're told that you should take steroids and all sorts of other nonsense. You inject those into your body because you're being body shamed left, right, and center. You go into the cabinet to try and grab some healthy food before you go to the gym, and what do you know, the thing that you might buy or provide for yourself has eight thousand different ingredients, most of them made in a lab. That might give you a little bit of protein, but it's probably gonna give you a whole bunch of other poison.↗

21:17Ian MalcolmWhat are you to say about this? You open your phone on the way to the gym, what do you get? Andrew Tate demoralizing you. And prior to that, you probably get an advertisement aimed at humiliating you, with somebody that looks like you, if you're white. Looking like the villain or the fool as other races in your own homeland are treated as the heroes of everything. It's unreasonable, Andrew Tate, to blame that squarely on the individual as if he is unreasonable for being frustrated about these realities. Which comes full circle, because what are we now seeing is the suggestion that it's low IQ antisemitism to suggest that it is the Jews pushing some of these problems on society. And for what it's worth, I can agree to that to an extent. That's why we hold these spaces. That's why somebody like Truth Teller does an amazing job educating people on the ins and outs, the whos, whos of the past and the present.↗

22:28Ian MalcolmBecause it isn't acceptable, I agree, to say society's terrible, therefore I'm not gonna try to do anything. That's, that isn't taking accountability for yourself. But it's also absolute BS to suggest that somebody's suggesting that there is a force destroying everything, that you can only note that or care about it or talk about it if you're either bitter, angsty, or a low IQ individual. That is ridiculous. You know what is low IQ? Is the suggestion that the noticing of patterns of control, of forces of demoralization and destruction, that that isn't something to discuss. That is low IQ, and you know how I know this? Because I went to Grok! God, it's so much fun utilizing AI to basically present some of these ideas. And so I went to Grok, and I said, "Grok, what are the hallmarks of-- this is the exact prompt. What are the hallmarks of high IQ individuals? Give me a list of twenty items, each defined in ten words or less." Do you know what the number two item is? It is rapid learning, observation, and pattern recognition. What a curious thing, pattern recognition! The noticing of society, of mechanisms of control. Now we can also go through some of these other ones, insatiable curiosity about endless topics. That was the number one item. And isn't it curious that in these very spaces, we try to understand all the disparate aspects of this power structure? It is a hyper-focus that we have, and we're gonna come back to this in a moment, but on the endless diverse aspects of that power control. The number three, strong abstract and conceptual thinking. What does that mean? What is abstract thinking? It's the ability to comprehend that which is either foreign or is very nebulous, multifaceted. It takes us to that entire thing about the breakfast question for those that are familiar with that little internet trope. We've got excellent memory retention and recall, high adaptability to new situations, intellectual humility with the ability to say, "I don't know."↗

24:47Ian MalcolmAnd what's very curious is what we do know is that in many of these spaces, when we find ourselves at odds debating these subjects with certain members of a different group of people, I almost will never hear them say, "I don't know." I will say that I know nothing. I am comfortable acknowledging that. And you know who else has done that? Many of the great thinkers. And I don't say it because I want to be like them or to emulate their words, but I want to emulate their worldview and to recognize that in the grand scheme of things, I don't know anything about anything. I don't even know why we're here. What we're doing, how we got here, I don't know any of those things with absolute conviction. I believe and I have faith that a higher power set them in motion, but I can't say that I know that with absolute certainty and conviction. Just like I can't say that I absolutely know that every little piece of the media is owned by a certain group of interest, but I can look at almost all of the major ones, and I can come to a very glaring set of patterns, which takes us back to that second little hallmark there, around pattern recognition, quickly changes minds with new evidence. That is the number seven piece, and that's why I focus on data. That's why I ask when people come in here and they wanna debate some of these subjects. I will ask them very straight up. For example, are Jews disproportionately in control of the media? Yes or no. Are blacks disproportionately violent based on crime statistics? Those are two things that anybody who has been involved in any of my spaces or seen any of my content can be very easy for them to answer those questions. But a lot of people won't do it. And I don't know if it's dishonesty or perhaps low IQ that drives those things, but you should be able to change your mind with new evidence. If somebody came in and said, "You're wrong in your worldview, here is why," "Here are the ten top media companies," "Here's the leadership of nine of them that have nothing to do with the group of people that you're talking about," if somebody could do that, I would say, "Oh, well, what do you know, I must be wrong." Number eight, deep, prolonged concentration On areas of interest, deep, prolonged concentration on those interests. This interests me.↗

27:11Ian MalcolmWe live in the Matrix. We have started to figure that out. We have dissected it. We are understanding every piece of it. We are Neo walking around in the simulation. I find it extremely interesting to, to notice all the disparate aspects of it. Including Arm and Hammer, who some of you might be familiar with if you've been in truth teller spaces, and the fact that apparently, according to backup, aka Jonathan, Pam Bondi is literally a descendant of that power structure and of that family.↗

27:42Ian MalcolmIt's almost as if every single day we turn around and we find, wait a second, not only are there eerie similarities in the social construction and the economic engine of today to the USSR But it seems like the Bolsheviks are still in power of almost everything. Seems like their ideology still reigns supreme, and it's still apparently members of their family are literally in control of some of the highest positions of power in the Western world. How weird is that? So we do have those deep, prolonged concentration on these areas of interest. That is apparently high IQ, so is creative and unconventional problem solving, wide gener-gener-general knowledge about domains, which we try to do in many different ways, strong self-awareness and introspection.↗

28:32Ian MalcolmSpeaking of areas of focus, we talk a lot about IQ Isn't it interesting that we talk about the IQ of a certain group of people? These are hallmarks of high IQ that we're discussing, including introspection. What group of people is it that says they're high IQ that seem to have zero ability to have any introspection? I wonder how curious that might be. We then have preferred solitude for deep thinking, which I suppose I actually don't really do. I enjoy these types of thinking experiments and exercises with all of you. So maybe indicative of my low IQ on that one. But empathetic and emotionally perceptive. What group of people don't do that? What group has zero empathy as far as I can see? Questions, assumptions, and authority. And authority figures. Who is it that are our authorities? Who are those that dictate that we see the world a certain way? Isn't it curious that it almost always is a member of a certain set of interests? It's apparently very high IQ to look at that and say, "I'm going to question and challenge you where I think you're wrong." That's what we do in these spaces. Witty, quick, associative humor. I apologize, I'm not a funny guy. Strategic laziness via efficiency. Now, this one I found very-- speaking of being introspective, this one I found very curious. Because I love taking shortcuts when it comes to logic, when it comes to work. When I see something, I need to get something accomplished. What's the best way for me to approach this problem? I don't need to, if, if, if the goal is to chop down this tree and to put it into little pieces that I can put into a fireplace, maybe I'm not just gonna sit there and start whacking with the axe. Maybe I'm gonna see what it would cost to get a chainsaw, to get some gasoline for it. Right? What other efficiencies can I find along the way? It's apparently a high IQ decision, but the reason I usually do it is due, again, to that idea of being lazy via strategic efficiency, which I find kind of funny. Talk to self for reasoning That's, number seventeen here, which is kind of curious, 'cause we learned the other day that a large chunk of people don't ever talk to themselves at all. They have no internal monologue. Rabbi Malias actually makes a very interesting critique against this suggestion, despite obviously being a high IQ individual, so perhaps that's one that's up for debate. Notices subtle details that others miss. I think everybody in these spaces, we notice a certain set of patterns that everybody else is clearly missing. Thrives On complexity and nuance. That's why I do think that the yes and no questions can be very effective when you're trying to simply wrangle somebody, but at times it is unreasonable to ask certain questions in a yes or no capacity. Sometimes you do need to provide some color. And then lastly, open to new ideas and experiences. You know who's seemingly not open to new ideas when it comes to Jewish supremacy? Seems to be Andrew Tate. Seems to not wanna talk about that. Now, why might that be? Could it be that wizard that's over his shoulder in some of those pictures? Or perhaps is he just a low IQ individual that's not open to those other ideas? Maybe the only thing he knows how to push is the status quo and is the cultural norms that we are given by the machine that he clearly supports. 'Cause even if you think that he's not a shill and you think that he's, let's say, intentional in what it is that he's putting out with the world, well, then it sure does align with the degenerate cultural values that we see↗

32:07Ian MalcolmRomanticizing at every turn. And so low IQ antisemitism, what is that? That is essentially just the latest shrug to try and get people to stop noticing the things that we're suggesting. That's what they need to do, because we are making too much noise. We're making too many waves. The no wake zone that is the, let's say the, the, the harbor of discussing Jewish supremacy, that is not acceptable. You aren't allowed to have any wake. You can't make any noise, 'cause if you notice the pattern and you do, well then we need to censor and suppress you. And if we can't do that by force or fear, then we will try and get anybody else that might hear you to just shrug you off as a fool. Low IQ antisemitism is being weaponized to try and get individuals to stop having these conversations, and it's very curious because some of the people that are throwing that term around are the very individuals that would tell you that they're gonna try and help you escape the matrix, as Andrew Tate often does, despite the fact that he won't talk about the group of people who constructed the matrix.↗

33:17Ian MalcolmIronic, isn't it, that you will sit there and say, "Don't work that corporate job, you need to escape the Matrix and recognize you're not a hamster in the wheel." Instead, you're going to think the way that he wants you to, which is to basically prefer, per- let's, let's say to, to lust after your own hedonism, your own vanity, your own materialism, and your own self-serving and self-seeking pleasures. That isn't escaping the Matrix, folks. That's further entrenching you in it.↗

33:46Ian MalcolmLow IQ antisemitism. That is a problem if we are going to define it as the mere suggestion that running around saying Jews are bad, that is a low IQ statement. But to say that the Jews control the media isn't, especially not if it's backed up with the data and the reason and the exploration of that subject to come to the conclusion that, no, it irrefutably is run by that group of people. So is big tech, so is AI, so are most of the Fortune 500 companies, so certainly are the hedge funds, so are the big players in the money world, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard. We can go through the entire litany of all the things that I would normally talk about. But if you're gonna say that Washington, D.C. and the politicians, that they are obedient to Jewish supremacy, that's not low IQ antisemitism. It is if you say it and you don't have any way of backing it up and you haven't thought critically about the subject. But I don't think that's what these folks are trying to actually do. What they are trying to get to is to get their fan base that quickly are starting to notice the patterns that we talk about in these rooms and to just not talk about them because their cult of personality, whether it's Andrew Tate or perhaps Nick Fuentes↗

35:07Ian MalcolmThis is an issue that they need to figure out how to reverse engineer, because the genie's out of the bottle and the red pill is no longer the idea that to be a "bass dude," you gotta just get with all the girls and treat 'em like this, that, and the other thing that Andrew Tate's trying to push. That era is over. So is the era of slurring people with ad hominems and other Marxist rhetoric into silence. We won't take it anymore. That is low IQ. We will stand confidently, we will stand competently, we will describe and define the world as we see it, which includes the ability to say that the Jews are in disproportionate positions of power across most of, if not almost all of, if not all of The levers of power in the West, across academia, across tech, across politics, across media, across, on and on and on.↗

36:04Ian MalcolmIf we can defend that statement, there's nothing remotely low IQ about it. Again, the only thing that is, is the suggestion that you're not allowed to say it. That would be low IQ. So ignore and avoid the slurs as best you can, rise above it, and recognize that they are most certainly Going to throw these slurs around more and more hostily because they know nothing else. And I would suggest the reason is because they aren't that high IQ. Ironically, the people in charge are probably either low IQ or they're sociopathic. But either way, to come full circle, to suggest- That it is merely complaining and whining to say that the people that are atop these totem poles that are destroying the society that you live in, to say that that is only something that you can arrive at because of your own, let's, let's say, dissatisfaction or your own shortcomings. That is ridiculous. You should always speak against power, especially if it is destroying the things that you love, the community that you live in, the religion that you subscribe to, and the chance for you or your generations to come to pursue those things in a righteous and moral sense. And so, don't ever back down from this merely on the grounds of those slurs. Consider information, reconsider your positions And to go back to that list we read off of, really think critically, speak truthfully. If somebody presents something that is alternative to your worldview and it has merit, consider it. Consider that we might not know everything all the time.↗

37:48Ian MalcolmThat is the, the hallmark of that high IQ individual. So low IQ antisemitism. You know who's probably gonna say that? Folks like Ben Shapiro, folks on the mainstream media. And the only reason that they're doing it is because, again, they are the ones either too low IQ to recognize what's going on or too morally bankrupt to care. So we will keep doing that which is right. We will keep thinking critically, we will keep reevaluating the world around us, keep truthfully discussing it, and trying our best to improve it by bringing attention to others about it.↗

38:25Ian MalcolmSo with that being said, I know we got lots of hands in here, lots of other people. I wanna welcome everybody and anybody that's in here, especially if you are a listener and it keeps cutting you out from the audio, if so, I apologize. Twitter seems to really dislike these conversations. but with that being said, if you wanna come up, you wanna share your opinions, please do. and we'll certainly do a Q&A. We'll probably run this space maybe for an hour or so, so it'll be a little bit shorter, although I have a hallmark↗

38:50Ian Malcolmand a↗

38:55Ian MalcolmBut with, with that being said, Joanne, just kinda curious for any of your thoughts, feedback, your critiques and criticisms.↗

39:03@joann_marieHey, and thank you so much for hosting, and everybody, thank you so much for being here. Yeah, guys, please repost this space, and if you guys go to it, I will also repost it and follow Ian and, and Wolf, and everyone in the panel is just amazing. And no, I agree with everything you said, and I think low IQ antisemitism is like not liking- Than because of their like big no-noses or because they look like, like, gremlins or they have like the ugliest haircuts ever or they're always dancing for some reason. No, no, it's, it's like, or them, them being super cheap. But that doesn't affect me, and I, that, I don't give a-- I don't care about that at all, you know? I mean, it's, it's weird, but it doesn't, it doesn't affect me. But it does affect me that they are always pushing for war,↗

39:53@joann_mariethey are always Vile, vile, disgusting ways. I saw them celebrating that a lot of people in, in Spain died in a train accident. Like, why are these people celebrating the death of people? Like, this is insane. They are like cheering for the genocide of my people. They are like, that vile behavior and also canceling everything and the gaslighting of saying like, "Oh, no, we don't control anything." That's antisemitism while literally saying that you can't go to clubs anymore because they played a song that- You don't like, like, that's insane, and, so all of those things are, of course, we have to talk about them, and, and it's not low IQ, it's--↗

40:38@joann_marieThey do control them, and, and that needs to be checked, and also, yeah, I, I, I wish, I truly, truly wish they are simulated and they stop trying to destroy the world. Oh, they are also trying to cause the apocalypse, like, bro, like, what the fuck is? Like, and, and they're like, "Oh, why are you angry about this? You're, you're literally trying to cause the apocalypse. Like, why are you doing this? This is insanity." So anyway, no, it's, I, I, I don't think it's low IQ at all. And, and thank you so much for hosting this amazing space, Ian, because it's, it's a really important conversation to have. So, yeah, that's all, and thank you.↗

41:17@joann_marieshould we go to Hans?↗

41:19Ian MalcolmYeah, absolutely. Let's, we certainly bounced around, get some, some alternative viewpoints, and I'm kinda curious for everybody's thought on either this subject, the rant, or for some of the, let's say influencers involved in, the activity which begot it. And, I, I say that just because there's lots of different perspectives, and people are welcome to share theirs, even if it's a one eighty from, from some of those that I've shared. and with that being said Maddie, who, just came up here, and, we'll, we'll check in with him, and then we'll go down to Mr. Tom.↗

41:53Speaker 1Hey, what's up, guys? Thanks for, letting me speak. Yeah, I just jumped in, so I didn't really hear everything you talked about. However, I, I'm assuming you guys are talking about Sneak-O and Myron and everything that happened with that group, and what they said. And, and, Yeah, I mean, I would agree. I believe Tate just came out and said something like, "Uh, yeah, it's all, it's your fault, stop blaming Jews for everything, for your shortcomings," I believe he said something like that in an interview.↗

42:24Speaker 1that being said, I, I, I would agree with you that, it, it is ridiculous because they are literally responsible for so much. But to your point, you can't come out and use slurs and name calling Because you'll never get anybody to understand the problem. This is why if anybody ever listens to me speak online, my podcast, even publicly and privately, I never use any racial slurs at all, because if you're gonna red pill people or j-pill people, you can't use terminology like that if you're gonna get the average normie to actually listen to what you say and to jump on board with the truth and with reality and to understand truly what's going on Going on. You, the, the second you say any racial slur or any type of real racist comment, they're just gonna turn away from you. Am I offended by those words? Of course I'm not. But, I mean, I don't care either way. But you don't do it in a public setting because if you're trying to red pill people and get people on board, you can't use that terminology. That's why I don't even use it privately. I won't even use those words privately. Now, that being said, the only thing that I would play devil's advocate with↗

43:39Speaker 1Or I'm sorry, Andrew Tate saying that you're blaming, Jews for all your problems and stuff like that. The only thing that I would say is, well, we allow it. That's the only thing. We let it happen without any type of recourse, without any type of pushback. Unfortunately, you know, all of the politicians who are bribed, all of the people, the multinational corporations, all the people involved in everything, all the lobbyists that bribe politicians, you know, these- These people are the ones who are passing legislation controlled either through bribery, blackmail, or threats. They are the ones who choose to be bribed, they're the ones who choose to be blackmailed, they're the ones that choose to be threatened. Now, you can make the argument that, well, what else would you do? That's, that's, they're gonna have to do that, or they're gonna be doxed, they're gonna be thrown out of office, they're gonna be arrested. That may be the case, but they still have the choice to do the right thing, and↗

44:40Speaker 1Have the choice to react and not allow it to happen either. Unfortunately, we don't organize in large numbers, we're not all on board with it, and we sit here and whine and complain about it, but yet we don't really do anything about it. So in that aspect, that is the only thing that I will say Andrew Tate may have a point on, of course he wouldn't ever say that, but I would say that, and I think it's time for us to actually try and at least come up with solutions to try and fix the problems in this country. To where they do have, control in all these facets of power, and they control discourse in the media, the news, the education, entertainment, everything. So that being said, we need to do something to push back against it, to fix the problem. So in that aspect, that's the only way Andrew Tate would be correct in saying that we, are blaming them for everything, even though they are responsible for, for all these problems, but we are responsible for not doing anything about it, I'll yield.↗

45:41Ian MalcolmNo, re-really well stated there, Maddie. And, and, and that's, I, I think you nailed it on the head, right? There, there are realities. Again, we have to get up every single day and make the most of ourselves. We can't just, p-pro-project all of our insecurities or inadequacies on someone else. but if we are getting up and, and every piece of, let's say the, the treadmill that we step on is filled with booby traps and Snickers bars and other things that are designed to actually make us the antithesis of health, while, you know, essentially the mainstream media is mocking you if you're not the, the pinnacle of it, i-i-it's of course creating that negative feedback loop, and, and so we should, we should fully, one hundred percent make the most of ourselves. We should also do the most that we can to try and bring attention to Undermining not only ourselves, but everybody around us in our community that's trying to do the exact same thing, right? And so I think that's very well stated. but that being said, let's go down to Tom, and then we'll check in with Mr. Thomas.↗

46:41Speaker 2Hey, what's up, Ian, Wolf, Joanne, everyone? Hope you guys are all doing well. Fantastic, fantastic opening to the space, bro. Very, very thought-provoking. Look, I think that what would, you know, when it comes to the question of what would World I mean, that's obviously a very interesting question. And, you know, there are strategic reasons,↗

47:05Speaker 2for example, why they didn't bring on the anti-Western, you know, agents like Obama, Biden, and, and all these other agendas that are so overtly anti-Western until people from that generation began to pass away from old age, because they would have said, "No, I don't have a fucking chance. What are these people doing? Nah, son, don't allow it." They would have shown the kind of leadership↗

47:26Speaker 2That would have made it impossible for all this garbage to completely destroy, you know, the vast majority of things about the West that made living there pleasant. And, you know, when it comes to-- Hold on a second, guys.↗

47:43Speaker 2Okay, I apologize, I apologize for that little interruption there. Yeah, when it comes to what Ian was saying pertaining to, you know, the low IQ antisemitism. Interestingly, I mean, as strange as it is, because I don't consider them low IQ individuals, I think Andrew Tate and his brother are definitely high IQ people. But the event that we witnessed, where we had Myron Gains and all these guys enjoying this, this music and all these things that have become very controversial over the course of the past few days, what we were witnessing, I guess one could suggest, was low IQ antisemitism in its purest, most unadulterated form.↗

48:23Speaker 2And, you know, it's an interesting thing, these guys, because there are things about the Tate that definitely contributed positively to certain things and, and certain, a certain critical step of the awakening to certain things, to the nature of the Matrix. I think what happens, guys, is when you end up in a position where you have as much money to lose as they do It's kind of like, all right, are we really gonna continue being at the tip of the spear, or are we gonna kind of play it safe? And I think that's what's going on, you know, it's an interesting subject, fantastic opening to the space, man, I look forward to hearing what everybody else has to say.↗

49:01@joann_marieHi, thank you so much for coming up, Dom, and I agree with everything. All right, Thomas, go for it!↗

49:10@thomas984634784Hey, Ian, great, great, opening, man. I agree with Tom, very well stated as always, and, thanks for giving me a mic and I hope, hope everybody, is having a good, day, and I hope you repost the space, get some more people in here, maybe some subversives, you know, who knows? But What I'd like to add to this is, you can see, this, this low IQ antisemitism. It's a funny way to frame it, because I feel like, this, they do the same thing with this, this fear, this fear-mongering you'll see with the, Islam community, and that they'll take this idea and they'll, they'll just kind of cloud it with bigotry or kind of tropes and they kind of just, you know- Rhetorically shield a, a larger issue. And when you look at the, the just quite obvious, trend to prioritize this one-sided relationship with the State of Israel over many of our other allies,↗

50:16@thomas984634784you know, a, a group of people, Israel has never deployed to assist Americans in any combat theater in our entire history but we, in two thousand twenty-four, sent a hundred boots on the ground to Israel operate FAD missile systems. You can look at the billions of dollars, the memorandum of understanding, the foreign military financing loans, the qualitative military edge, it is a laundry list. There are, you can look at going all the way back to the nineteen eighties with Ronald Reagan, the Krantz Amendment, and all these different,↗

50:46@thomas984634784stipulations and kind of sweetheart deals, that have been given to Israel. They don't have to repay loans that they're given. There's this- Silly argument that it, it's not economic aid. You know, the Council of Foreign Relations have stated that, you know, when you adjust for inflation, three hundred and fifteen billion dollars have gone to Israel, you know, across various wars. They say, "Oh, that's not economic aid." Well, when you give somebody three hundred and fifteen billion dollars, that frees them up their economy, their spending, all these other different ways that when you pump money into an economy, that's fungibility, that's the-- you, that is economic aid. And you, yeah, we, we- We've spent, and there's, that's, that's a very conservative estimate. You could, you know, economists like Thomas Stoffer have said that the cost of the, Israeli-Palestinian conflict since nineteen seventy-three and, and before has, has been three trillion dollars direct to the American taxpayers. Over two hundred and seventy-five thousand, jobs are diverted through contract diversions and different, you know, ties, American jobs, two hundred and seventy-five thousand annually, every- year lost due to these, these relationships. There's economic strain, there's all these different things. And, you know, if, if we weren't thirty-eight trillion dollars in debt, if, if we weren't, you know, peddling, trying to peddle, you know, fifty-year mortgages while strip-mining Americans' 401ks to bail out private equity firms like Blackstone and Apollo Global Management and KKR,↗

52:18@thomas984634784many have ties to Israel. KKR built illegal settlements, and Blackstone is connected Maybe to the global housing crisis, but Apollo Global Management was founded by Leon Black, an Epstein client, and the largest private settlements involved with Epstein, sixty-two point five million dollars to the Virgin Islands. But this is all to say that, you know, with the thirty-eight states, you can't boycott Israel, municipalities like San Marcos being targeted for embargoing aid to Israel, antisemitism, it, you know, the way they've bloated, hate speech in this country to include antisemitism laws into this, it's all redundant In the Rights of the Civil Rights Act, Titles two and seven, respectively, six even. But the-- I mean, it, it's, it's, it's-- I, I know I'm going on this long tangent, but it's, it's You can't ignore it at this point. It's, this is all verifiable. You look at the thirty-three percent tariffs Israel held on American goods up until this whole tariff war. Everything about the relationship is one-sided. Assets like Jonathan Pollard or Jeffrey Epstein just being free from justice. Criminals like Tom Alexandervich fleeing justice and being harbored by the Israeli government. Robert Shapolsky, all these different people who are involved in organ harvesting and all these different human rights abuses that are just largely ignored by the Israeli government. The human rights abuses that were per-facilitating Gaza, including the many dual Americans who've been killed, eleven since two thousand and two dual Americans killed by the IDF I mean, it's, it's, it's so abhorrent and so,↗

53:58@thomas984634784offensive that I think that it's low IQ to not call out that relationship. And I think that it's incumbent upon all of us to search for that more perfect union, and we don't get that by allowing another country to step on our sovereignty. And that's the larger issue here. It's low IQ to not call that out. It's low IQ to, you know, act as an apologist for a foreign nation or some sycophant for an administration that isn't, you know, realizing on the promise that they were given. They were, they were given a mandate to provide on that promise. And so it's, I, I think, you know, not to, to land here and not rattle on 'cause I wanna hear from everybody else, and I really appreciate, you know, Tom too, I, I wanted to hear if anybody has anything to, to add to his, his query. but it, it's, it's, it's kind of, we're all, woken up to the fact that the corruption is, obviously tied to certain, you know, power structures that are pushing certain trends and certain wars and Certain abuses that we shouldn't allow as a people, they're on a, on a moral stance and just an economic stance, we're thirty-eight trillion dollars in debt, we can't afford these bad relationships anymore. But thank you guys for giving me the mic and hearing me out, and, I'll stick around and I'd love to hear from everybody else. Ian, great space as always, thank you.↗

55:27@joann_marieHi, thank you so much, Tom, and I, I loved everything. Oh, sorry.↗

55:30Ian MalcolmYeah, no, just really appreciate that, Tom, and, and, and look, I, I think it's exactly right, in the sense that the thing that is clearly low IQ is, on both ends of the spectrum. It's low IQ to run around and say something that you can't validate with data. Right? That's kind of like running around and saying, "It's the Mormons that are in control." I would say that that is low IQ.↗

55:54Ian Malcolmbut simultaneously, on the other side, we, we can suggest that it would be low IQ not to notice the absurd and unusual amounts of, of power that is controlled by a certain set of individuals, and we did that just the other day where we had the debate, and there was, I think it was Jewlicious, where I asked, if he would be comfortable if over- Over in Israel, all of the media and all of the politicians and all of the tech companies were all run by Chinese people, and it seems really difficult for him to try and comprehend the question, and perhaps the reason is because it's so preposterous. It really is.↗

56:33Ian MalcolmIf you went anywhere and there was a foreign group of people running everything, you would say this is really bizarre. You would say that you live in an empire under enslavement. And yet that's essentially what the West is right now, and it's somehow ridiculous or low IQ to note that. No, it's low IQ to not notice it. You're either programmed so deeply that you can't evaluate and consider anything else, or you're a fool, or you're a liar. I suppose that's the third option. You're aware of it, but you're just indifferent 'cause you're a liar and a shill. Those are the only three options. And so I, I think you're exactly right on that, Thomas. I don't understand how more people aren't able to connect these dots, and I can understand, and I think that's actually why we have to dive into the history, we have to look at the religion, we have to look at the culture, because if you don't know those backgrounds, it's really hard to comprehend why it would matter right now, even if you knew what it was that was happening.↗

57:33Ian MalcolmRight? It's one thing to say a group of people have all of this control. If it was the Chinese in the West that were atop everything, I would perhaps find it unusual, but if society was getting way better, I don't know if I would care. I would look at what happened in the past where they had that type of control. Was it okay? Was it successful? Was it glorious?↗

57:55Ian MalcolmThat's why I don't think I would mind if we had benevolent leaders that actually cared about their people. But instead, we see psychopaths that are clearly destroying the economy, that are clearly mass importing migrants for the social lack of cohesion that it constructs, and then we look at the past and we notice they did the same thing!↗

58:14Ian MalcolmThe Bolshevik Revolution, let's not forget, it was basically a color revolution of individuals that felt like outcasts, either 'cause they were literally kicked out and cast out, hence outcast, or because they were foreign and they loathed the, the ethnic Christian Russians that were in power. That's the coalition that was built and basically brought down the empire. Take a look around you. Do you think it's just pure coincidence that everything is designed not only to be weaponized against, but to demoralize and to, let's say, build animus against whites amongst everybody?↗

58:52Ian MalcolmIs it really uncomfortable that in your own homeland, the people that are being imported into your communities, which destabilize it, raise all the costs, lower, let's say, the life satisfaction, that they are also being propagandized to hate you? Do you think it'd be really bad and dangerous if a whole group of people that were brought in simultaneously hate you, and then, for example, the power grid collapsed or other economic chaos? What do you think those people who have gotten a lifetime of propaganda to dislike you-- how do you think they're gonna behave? Is it reasonable to suggest that that's not just economic impacts? That is prospectively the construction of literally an army in your backyard by your leaders. That is treason.↗

59:41Ian MalcolmIt is traitorous. That is the gates of Toledo in a modern sense. We're gonna open up the floodgates, bring 'em all in, crowd your communities, stir 'em all up And then let's just light the fuse and watch as everything goes to chaos. Is it reasonable to note that one group of people seem to top almost every piece of that puzzle?↗

1:00:05Ian MalcolmAgain, is it low IQ to notice it, or is it low IQ not to? And is it absurdly subversive to suggest that people discussing these things in a high IQ fashion are low IQ merely because they're talking about this group of people? And then we look at the funding of those individuals tossing around that critique, and what do you know? It's good old Iggy, the wizard,↗

1:00:27Ian Malcolmthe wizard rabbi of Andrew Tate. What an absolute joke. It's really well stated there, Thomas. Really well stated, Tom Pryor. And with that, let's continue right on. And, Joanne, who would be next?↗

1:00:44@joann_marieIt's Veritas. Welcome, Veritas. How are you?↗

1:00:48Speaker 3Hello, Joanne, I'm very good. All you lovely people here, on the panel, good to be here. Yeah. Do they really have nothing to lose, Tom? or are they just not in fear of losing anything? Are they probably just complete paid ups? Are they written characters that are just doing their role, that have these character arcs from being base to complete shills?↗

1:01:20Speaker 3I'm not sure. I think a lot of them definitely are. when you look at, Nick Fuentes, I think he's the prime example, right? From, calling out Trump, to basically being a, a MAGA shill now, right? Everything changed now, so it's, it's just wild. And, ab-about this, pattern recognition, I put up a post, I think, it's a, it's a meme I made it, but it's very, very, fitting to the situation, right? Pattern recognition is hateful conduct at this moment.↗

1:02:00Speaker 3when they can't control a movement anymore They have to smear and label it, right? And, Elon put out a post, I'm not sure, today, yesterday, didn't pay really attention, but, he said, "Uh, this algorithm sucks.↗

1:02:21Speaker 3why doesn't he change it? Right? it's, it's his app." I mean, come on, just change it when you think, the algorithm sucks. And, Mario, Zayushil Nafa put out a post today, with some, keywords, that, will put you in an echo chamber that will limit your reach and, and, because of, engagement farming, right? look at your timeline. What is your timeline? You have this small bubble of your echo chamber, and ninety-five percent of the rest, when you go on the, for you page, it's all opposing views. Right? No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, you get flooded with controversial takes, opposing your own worldview, right? And, Some of these, keywords are globalism. Why, why is globalism, all of a sudden, being hateful contr- conduct when you mention it?↗

1:03:36Speaker 3maybe because they don't want to recognize you that it is antisemitic to be opposed to globalism? Why is every single, post I'd make about the Bolshevik Revolution, mentioning any Jewish influence, labeled as hateful conduct? I get two mails each day from Twitter that I, have the visibility limited on my ac- account on, on the post. You can't quote the Talmud at all.↗

1:04:11Speaker 3When you mention anything that is controversial from the Talmud, hateful conduct. When you mention any, affiliation of, I-IDF and Mossad to terrorism, hateful conduct, right? Jewish influence in the Bolshevik Revolution, hateful conduct, right? They don't want you to recognize. And, I, as you mentioned, Ian, it's One of the most critical parts of high IQ to see patterns. And when you see patterns, you see it all, right? You see communism, you see public school system, you see cultural Marxism, LGBTQ+ degeneracy in media, subversion, controlling of AI, child porn, child trafficking, Talmudic pedophilia, or you↗

1:05:03Speaker 4see what you want to see and you see shadows, see what you↗

1:05:07@joann_mariewant to see. Is this okay?↗

1:05:09Speaker 5Relax.↗

1:05:12Speaker 5Sorry, I'll mute him next time. But, y'know, just relax, buddy. You'll be last now. You're gonna let everybody else talk, so we can deal with you when everybody else is done.↗

1:05:24Ian MalcolmYep. Yes, you're, you're to the back of the queue. And, if you jump in again, we will just remove you from the speaker panel, and we will label that low IQ, low impulse control.↗

1:05:40@joann_marieSorry, go for it, I'm ready to test.↗

1:05:48Speaker 5Double mute, I'm ready↗

1:05:52Speaker 3to test. Oh, yeah. So, yeah, cute, Zayushil, I, I can, I can, go on with this list for basically ever, right? Every single talking point, the left complains about and the right complains about, it is either created by, Jewish influence or by Z-Zionist powers or however you wanna call it, Bolsheviks, globalists, Zionists, Globalizers, whatever, right? They either control it or they profit out of it, right? So, yeah, just, keep on recognizing they can't stop us. We are winning. The info war is on our side, so they have to label you as anti-Semite, as, as Jew-hater, as,↗

1:06:49Speaker 3anything they want, but keep on recognizing and, Keep real↗

1:06:54Speaker 5quick on that, right? And I just have to say that I think it's low IQ to use the word antisemitism right away. That's where I'm at.↗

1:07:05Ian MalcolmWell, it's, it's, it's just another slur to get you to stop talking, right? Now, there is sincere antisemitism, I suppose, out there. There is sincere racism. It's curiously not pushed by the people that are often labeled, racists. And when I say that, it's, it's because I feel like the groups that are, the ones that often throw that term around, that often hold some of the strongest racial animus, against their, quote-unquote, opposition. Right? But they're all-- Well, supremes, supremacists, right? Yeah, well, that's exactly what I'm saying. But↗

1:07:37Speaker 3yeah, you're absolutely right. just, just one sentence. what does antisemitism even mean, right? You have eighty percent of, Ashkenazi in the Jewish community, most of them are not even religious, right? if you boil it down, five percent of all Semitic, language, speaking people are Jews, right? And if only twenty percent- Of that are e-even remotely g-uh, from their genealogy from that region, you have less than one percent, Semites that are Jewish. So right, on,↗

1:08:14Speaker 5on, on that point. Yeah, on that point, right? So let's look at that, 'cause I mean, how many damn posts, did we make in our time on social media? like the term antisemitism, right? And let's look at it, why it was even created. it was likely created to weaponize victimhood, shift the narrative, and criminal, criminalize criticism of Jewish influence by framing opposition as hate rather than legitimate concern. Jews could silence dissent and consolidate power. This tactic, has been used to discredit critics Label them, label them as bigots and justify your supremacy. That's why I use the word supremacy, because when you wanna talk about, you know, they wanna throw the word around, and that's not to each Jewish person, it's just a general,↗

1:09:12Speaker 5summary of the word antisemitism, why it's even being used, when they wanna, when they wanna use the word Nazi, and, and, and you're a Nazi, well This is, this, this supremacy with this word they're using, well, what are you then? Right? It's just hypocritical, and you, you're being supremacist, you're being a, a supremacist yourself, so would you label yourself a Nazi, and then, you know, we can call them Ashkenazi Nazis, and I wonder why the Ashkenazi has Nazi in it. So it's really interesting. Anyways, continue, Ian. Fantastic, guys. And by the way, good to↗

1:09:48Ian Malcolmsee you. Yeah, of course, Wolf, and, and thank you for coming up and helping to co- and keep the, the ship in check here. and we do have lots and lots and lots of requests, so I apologize, but we'll probably cycle through some speakers, a little bit more, quickly than we normally do. but please put your hand up, and if you do come up and speak, and I do move, move you back down, please just throw your hand back up if you At the time of Dr. Michael Rechtinwald, who came in here, I'm gonna be very curious for some of his thoughts on this subject, so I apologize to people that are in the queue. but Dr. Rechtinwald, I'm curious for your thoughts on this subject because we're not only seeing this idea that it is, quote unquote, Jew hatred, that's the one that I feel like the liberals and the left and the, the, the machine have been using for a long time, but we're now even seeing right wing red pill influencers like Andrew Tate suggest that↗

1:10:46Ian MalcolmHate, racism, that's flooding the zone, rather than perhaps the noticing that I think people like yourself discuss in a very professional, very mature, very data-driven fashion. So I'm curious for your thoughts on this kind of social, would you call it, this occurrence that we're seeing all around us?↗

1:11:03@rectheregimeHey, and nice to be here. Nice to see everybody. Thanks for having me up so quickly, I appreciate it. I won't take too much time, but, I will say that I'm getting, you know, as the founder of the only American anti-Zionist PAC, Azapac, I'm getting some grief. I had a newspaper recently dig up some old tweets of mine to suggest, something to that effect. I said something like this. I said I want to unite the quote unquote anti semite and quote right and left. And they posted that and suggesting that I was trying to unite anti semites.↗

1:11:45@rectheregimeWhen what I was saying was the people that are called anti semites, that's who I wanna unite. The people that are called anti semites according to their definitions, which are, you know, look, the IHRa definition of antisemitism Has now been adopted by thirty-seven states. Does anybody, did everybody realize that, that they're actually codified as law in seventeen states as statutory law. The IHRAC definition of antisemitism, which of course is the moving pul- you know, the moving target, it's a provisional working definition, which means it could change at any time when they find new, you know-↗

1:12:30@rectheregimemanifestations of what they call antisemitism, they'll add it to the list, I suppose. And that means they criticize Israel technically, because they have some-- in that definition, there's one that says if you consider, Israel a racist state, then you're an antisemite. if you don't think Israel should exist, you're an antisemite. By the way, AIPAC makes no stand on the state of Israel. we're-- what we're concerned about is getting rid of, is de-Zionizing the United States government. And that, we, we don't care if Israel exists or not. I mean, we're not trying to abolish the state of Israel like leftist anti-Zionists. We're not crying from the river to the sea. We're talking about our own country here and the infiltration and occupation of our country by these people. And we say Zionist because not all- Not all Zionists are Jews, not all Jews are Zionists, but let's face it, Zionism serves ultimately Zionist Jews. I mean,↗

1:13:34@rectheregimeand you can't even say Zionist Jews. That was another thing they quoted in, this paper. They said I-- They quoted me saying Zionist Jews as if that's something like that doesn't exist or that makes me a bigot because I notice there are Zionist Jews, like Miriam Abelson. if that isn't a Zionist Jew, I don't know what is. As for what Jews are, I don't- I don't even know what they are. I think it's more like a club. I, I don't know how you get in this club, but I don't want in it, but I think it's more like a club,↗

1:14:03@rectheregimelike, like a membership, and I think Trump's in the club. I do believe his Zionism and, judo, judophilia, for lack of a better word, his judophilia goes way back in its history. I read an article by a brilliant guy, Jose Nino, that goes into the, The extent of Trump's family's, you know, like servility and sort of service to Jewish interest in the country, it's unbelievable. It's, it's way before his presidency, it goes back to his childhood and, his father. I mean, I think his father might have been a crypto, frankly, but I don't know. But he was very, very, very pro-Jewish and pro-Israel, and so, I think- I think Zionism or whatever it is runs deeply in Trump's DNA, more or less, you know what I mean, sort of figuratively speaking. He absorbed it very young, and that's where he's coming from. So there isn't any real surprise for those who are in the know about what's going on now with his complete abdication of US policy to Israel as the driver, we're like the We're like the glove with Israel as the hand. Whatever they have us do, it moves with the hand, and we do their bidding. I mean, it's unbelievable.↗

1:15:29@rectheregimeyou know, I, I don't know what antisemitism really is. I mean, or Jew hatred or any-- I mean, I guess I can understand what Jew hatred is, but antisemitism is such a nebulous term, provided to purposely- To be nebulous and also conflated with an- with Zionism. You know, the State of Israel does more than anybody to conflate Zionism and Jewishness, and, they have a very vested interest in doing that, and I believe they have a vested interest in generating antisemitism, so-called, because the more there is, the more they justify their rampages and, say, "Look, everybody hates us, we need to kill them now." it seems It seems to be the outlook. It's a very paranoid, aggressive outlook, and they wanna kill anybody that they think might kill them. And then, so this, this counts basically everybody, when it gets down to it. I mean,↗

1:16:32@rectheregimeanybody becomes Amalek, or according to Shabos Kestenbaum, Amalek, or Amalek, or Amalek, I don't care what the hell you call it, Amalek or the people that the Bible says Should be utterly destroyed, wiped out, man, woman, child, burden, the beast of burden, everything, destroyed. That's what they say, and that's what Netanyahu, of course, referenced in his own talk, his own speech about,↗

1:17:02@rectheregimeyou know, not a mosque, but really all Palestine, because when you say you're gonna kill everybody, man, woman, child, beast of burden, and everything else, that's pretty much, everybody that you're aiming at, and that's the whole Palestinian region, and I think probably everybody else in the Middle East As well. So anyway, that's-- I'll leave it at that and listen in and talk if you, if you think, you wanna bring me back in.↗

1:17:27Ian MalcolmNo, and, and, Dr. I'd be curious for your thoughts because, obviously that comment around, antisemitism will be our greatest weapon essentially, right? Going back to some of the early days of the concept of Zionism. the, the thing I'm curious about is this, this influencer nightclub outing, right? That of course made waves on social media. They basically got the, the Avengers of alt-right media to, together to go out and were clearly as, about as inflammatory as they, I suppose, could be within perhaps reason,↗

1:18:02Ian Malcolmand it's, it's generating lots of waves. Miami, the mayor just came out and condemned everything. Club owners are saying they're gonna kick all these people out of their establishments going forward. I'm, I'm curious for your thoughts on the Let's say the sincerity of these individuals doing what they thought was right versus perhaps behaving in a way that would be of benefit to the system, because perhaps there's some kind of ulterior motivations that might be there. I'm, I'm, I'm curious if you have any thoughts on that.↗

1:18:31@rectheregimeYeah, listen, I, I, I, I have made it a policy not to get into the disputes among, between, and around these influencers, because I find them, first of all none of them have come forth to try to help us, except for Stu Peters and a few others. so they haven't responded to any attempts to try to get on board to promote this. This is-- We're trying to do what-- to, to, to rectify what these people have been complaining about for years, and so it makes perfect sense that they would support us, but we haven't seen that. As for Nick Fuentes, I, you know, look, I don't wanna get a Groypur army against me.↗

1:19:18@rectheregimeI think the Groypurs are more sincere than him, let's put it like that.↗

1:19:24Ian MalcolmYou know, it's interesting that you say that, and as a last little question I'll throw your way on this subject, the idea of that army, we noticed that there's, you know, certainly cults of personality around some of these individuals. Andrew Tate certainly has his, Nick Fuentes, the, the Groypurs. One of the things I find curious is to that comment, I mean, obviously Nick Fuentes is a smart individual. he makes very astute observations, he communicates very well with the world around him, and, and he connects both the past to the present. To try and define what he thinks is the future, which, you know, is a, a, a very intelligent and articulate way to think about and present the world. but the, that army, and it's both with Tate or some of these other individuals, if you say something negative about them, one of the most curious pieces that I've found is that it is, like you were saying, you don't wanna get attacked by the, the griper army.↗

1:20:17Ian Malcolmwhen I've gone, it's, it's very curious, if I go against Nick Fuentes, I get attacked by If I then say something that is complimentary to his worldview, they attack me because I previously attacked something different than he said. And all along the way, the thing that I notice almost a hundred percent of the time is just about every one of the accounts has less than ten followers, they follow less than ten people, they have a post history that goes back perhaps a week or a month. it seems perhaps artificial, if not, I, I don't wanna use the term bot, but something feels very unusual about it. So I'd, I'd be curious for your thoughts on just Influencers in general and how, you know, artificial or sincere a lot of the followings that might exist behind these cults of personality that we see in this, kind of right wing world.↗

1:21:04@rectheregimeYeah, I mean,↗

1:21:07@rectheregimeI, I would say that, like I said, I think, I don't know what this, you know, I don't know what these, like, I don't know what Nick, Nick Fuentes' object is. Like, what is he trying to do besides become- You know, bigger, more re-more re-more, renown or infamous or whatever, because I don't see anything that leads to anything different, any change. It's just about Nick, and that's his business. He can do that if he wants, I don't care. But,↗

1:21:39@rectheregimeI've written these people off as far as in terms of, real action and, so, you know, I, I, I would think, I don't know, some of the statements he's made have been pretty peculiar about Epstein. I'm told that was a joke. I, I don't know. I don't watch him, so I don't know what else he said. I just saw the clips and, I don't-- it doesn't seem like a joke to me. It seems to be what he said is that, you know, Epstein is a cool guy. I mean, and, sort of, sort of exonerating him from pedophilia, which is ridiculous because there's plenty of evidence that ped And then it loses sight of the main thing. The main thing isn't the pedophilia per se, although that's terrible. It's, that's the currency, but the question is, what did the currency-- what does the currency buy? And what it buys is the US military. That's what's horrible here. The US military might is purchased by virtue of, pedophilia and, and bribery and other blackmail and fear. That's how they, drive the agenda, so they get the control of the whole military-industrial complex, in effect. And, that's what the purchase represents. So I, I really wish people would stop Talking so much about who had sex on the, on the plane, who was,↗

1:23:07@rectheregimewho, who was, you know, involved in terms of the clients. I wanna know who the boss was, and I, I think we know who the boss was. That was Mossad, and Epstein did many other things be-tw- besides traffic girls. He also did deals with, intelligence agencies, Mossad and, connecting Mossad to different things, technologies, con- connections. Connecting technologists across different platforms and things like that. So there's way more to it, and I wish that this, this kind of diversion would stop because it loses sight of the real issue that our government's been suborned, utterly subverted and taken over,↗

1:23:50@rectheregimeand the Epstein, You know, sex ring was just a, a means to do that. And I, I think it's horrible that this happened to these young women, and I think it's a despicable act, a set of acts, and also I think it's despicable to, to minimize it, frankly. But I'd say, let's look at the real upshot of it all, and the upshot is Israel controlling our military.↗

1:24:19Ian MalcolmDr. Ragnow, as always, so on point with the commentary there, and I couldn't agree with you more. These other items, largely distractions, and when it comes to Epstein, you're exactly right. The, the client list, while important, and while certainly it's significant and important that obviously the US government is protecting the very people involved, that is significant, but the most significant is what that leverage is being utilized for, and we seemingly know the answer, to those questions. which is, you know, that, that is a high IQ observation, right? It's one of these things, and, and to anybody out there that will look at the commentary, the efforts that you're taking, the political movement that you're trying to construct I would suggest though that guy's low IQ with his antisemitism because he talks about this power structure. I think that's where they hope to take and detract from and deflect all the people that are having these types of conversations, not To necessarily just gaslight us, although that's a benefit, and, and as the last little question, Dr. Eichmann, on this, I, I feel like the move is in hopes that fewer people are willing to listen to us because they'll just treat this entire discourse or the world in which we're trying, the worldview that we're trying to present, they'll, they'll just try to shrug it off as being that of simpletons or radicals or hateful so that, you know, reasonable people don't listen to the words that we're sharing.↗

1:25:47@rectheregimeYeah, I think that's right. And they want to, they want us to, to focus on, sort of, I, I don't, I don't know what low IQ antisemitism is except for a phrase that, people bandied about to try to discredit, I don't know, to try to exonerate and make, utterly, immune to any criticism of what they're saying by calling you an anti- a low IQ antisemite, you know?↗

1:26:17@rectheregimeI, I don't care about the IQ of people, frankly. I care about what their integrity is and what their values are and what they're, what they hold firm to, and the truth they tell. I don't care about their IQ. I think IQ is an overrated thing anyway, after all they say that, Jewish people have the one of the highest, and, you know, that does them a lot of good in terms of their morals, which I find to be very,↗

1:26:40@rectheregimenow I'm not talking about all Jewish people, I'm talking about particularly Zionist Jews. Who push this agenda and conflate Zionism with, anti-Zionism with antisemitism on purpose in order to immunize, immunize the State of Israel from all criticism, and they use that as a shield and a sword. It's both a sh-a shield and a sword, but they use it to strike you and they use it to deflect all attention away from their criminality.↗

1:27:15Speaker 5Real quick on all that, right? And CJ, please stop waving. Or, you know, there's a long list ahead of you, so stop waving so much, okay? Thanks. And, Michael and Ian on that topic, right? I think pretty much what's happening, they're testing the water, and, Nick Fuentes especially is testing the water and trying to see where he's gonna, how far he can maybe, you know, change the narrative, how-- Is, they're testing to see, okay, well, how many people can be subbed real quick and, and, and making it seem like it's not that bad, it's really, it's really not pedophilia. So, you know, with that alone, like, what did Let's say he got freaking, let's say, let's say a number, let's say twenty, thirty, forty percent aligned with his message.↗

1:28:00Speaker 5It, that's insane, right? They're like, "Oh, well, you know, he makes a good point, and you guys just don't get it. You guys are low IQ. You guys aren't getting it. You guys are just this and that, et cetera, et cetera." So, it's just subverting the people even further and it's subverting, a lot of good individuals even further↗

1:28:22Speaker 5I mean, that's just all I see out of this. The outcome out of this is just splitting us even further apart, and it's just gonna be smaller and smaller groups split apart even further. Yeah, I wanna, and that's really what I see. Yeah, let me say↗

1:28:35@rectheregimeone more thing about that. That's, that was my first, s-- you know, conclusion that what they were doing is by drawing Nick Fuentes upper into the, basically rehabilitating him and drawing him up into higher, you know, more and more so-called reputable podcasts Like Tim Cast and others, he's, it's splitting the people that followed him in half at least, if not worse. And so they're breaking up his influence. I, I think he's un, maybe unwary about that, but he should be wary about it because I think that's what's- Mi-Michael,↗

1:29:11Speaker 5Michael, what do you think about this? What do you think about this since you're on that? The Trojan Horse Theory? 'Cause some people throw that out there on my comments, and they're like, "What about this?" And it's just, it's him just playing the long game. He's just trying to get more people to follow him, he's just trying to get more people to, listen to him and all that stuff. So what do you think about the Trojan horse theory? That they're throw-- That's what they're using now, by the way. It's like, "Okay, buddy."↗

1:29:37@rectheregimeYeah, you mean like Nick is a Trojan horse and then inside of there is, some weaponry or something, which they will use?↗

1:29:44Speaker 5No, no, like, like him just doing this just to get himself m-more into mainstream and have more of the mainstream people listening to him and then get inside the walls and then be what he really is. Yeah, that's, blah, blah, blah, quote unquote.↗

1:30:00@rectheregimeThat's possible. Yeah, it's very possible. I'm not gonna claim to have any peculiar- insights into this in terms of, the long game and all that. I, I don't have time for it. It's not, no offense to those who are interested, frankly, I, I just don't have time for it. There's too much to be done, and I don't find it useful.↗

1:30:25Ian MalcolmI think that's very, very well stated there, Dr. Eichmann Wolf. And for what it's worth, it's, it's curious, Wolf, if we see more and more and more of his, let's say, the cult of personality or the individuals within it saying, "Oh, trust us, bro, this is, this is our, our end-around plan. We're, we're just gonna play like we are part of the Zionist empire so that we get a bigger voice," and then it'll all come full circle. That sounds very akin to the "trust the plan↗

1:30:53Ian Malcolmbut look, that's- Well, remember, remem-↗

1:30:55Speaker 5Real quick, real quick, and no, but real quick on that point, right? Remember when they were also, promoting, Gavin Newsom, right? And they were like, "Well, we want, we want accelerationism, we want, we want to accelerate things." Well, that's when I also countered them and said, "Well, you want Alex-- you want, you want to accelerate it? Well, are we not already in BIMAT two point zero? And I can point out↗

1:31:22Speaker 5It comes down to sexualization in schools, transgender studies, that kids have to take in schools, and then not only, not talking about all the, all the surgeries that they're allowing with taxpayer money and promoting it, a-and all these vile conditions are already there. So what, how much more acceleration do you need to use it as an excuse because you aren't a cold, and it's a cold mentality? That's just where I'm at. You know, I just don't believe this, this shenanigans anymore.↗

1:31:49@rectheregimeI think accelerationism is a lazy man's, approach to, you know, social, political, and economic change. I think it's just like there was a-- there's accelerationism in every sort of philo- political philosophy. Marxists have their accelerationists, you know, let's just let capitalism run wild and ruin everything, and then we'll pick it up from there.↗

1:32:15@rectheregimesome of the right have accelerationists. I don't buy into accelerationism. I think it's just laziness and an attempt, you know, basically, abdicating one's, agency, frankly. By the way, I see there's a guy in here named Yitz, he's a Zionist, you might wanna bring him up. I'd be curious to see what he says.↗

1:32:35Ian MalcolmOh, Dr. Actually, it's so funny that you say that because I was actually going to, and I apologize to anybody else that was up here in the The man have his words, because I gotta be honest, I, I'm rather surprised, and he bit his tongue, he followed the, the cue, and so Yitz, I, I wanna give you congratulations, thumbs up on that one. And, and with that, Yitz, we're, we're curious for your thoughts. do you think that the people in this room, and do you think those that are critiquing the idea of Jewish supremacy in the West are low IQ antisemites, or is that a broad brush that's being used to define reasonable critiques↗

1:33:18Speaker 4So first, I wanted to quickly clarify something from last night. It'll only take a minute, can I clarify what- You, you,↗

1:33:24Ian Malcolmsure again. You take a minute to clarify unabridged. Okay,↗

1:33:27Speaker 4okay. Yes. So we were having a discussion about, Bruce Miller and, and, Mr. Buffet last night, and I just want everyone to know that I don't, I'm not, I don't support Maduro. But, when, when everyone kept asking me, binary questions, just one word, yes and no, do you support this law? And, and like you combined everything together, of course I'm going to say I support it, because, you know, but what I wanna, I wanna clarify that I don't support, you know, modern methods, modern, medical methods that everyone uses now, even in the Haredi world. And I just wanted to clarify that before, before everyone starts making, new clips and new, videos like what they did A few months back.↗

1:34:10Speaker 4So that's number one. I don't, I don't support, anything that is, I don't support it. But I support, yes, do,↗

1:34:17Ian Malcolmdo not worry, I will not make a video clip of you saying yesterday that you supported rabbis sucking blood from babies.↗

1:34:24Speaker 4That, that, that, I do not support. and because it's, for external and internal reasons, it hurts our community internally. Like, with, puppies, for example, and different diseases, it's, it's not aesthetically pleasing, and also, externally, because, then it's kind of too bad it ever got started, because, in antisemites, you know, in the old days, it was just used to,↗

1:34:48Speaker 4in the old days, you would lick wounds to heal, and that's what it was about, but now let's move on. So, Michael was talking about, the definition of antisemitism. Let's discuss what antisemitism is. Antisemitism is very unique. It's the second oldest, oldest, hatred in the world, I believe the first is, is a misogyny. Antisemitism comes next, and it's very unique, unlike any other hatred. Hey, hold↗

1:35:10Ian Malcolmon, yeah, yes, I, I just wanna make sure I'm understanding this. Your belief is that the oldest hatred in the world for mankind is man versus woman, and that the second↗

1:35:23Speaker 4not man per se, antisemit, vassals. Paddle,↗

1:35:28@thomas984634784paddle. I'm going on. Okay,↗

1:35:30Speaker 4okay, so,↗

1:35:31Speaker 5so. But the, but the Ancho Michael's question, the Ancho,↗

1:35:35Speaker 4the Ancho Michael. So↗

1:35:36Speaker 5would you say that the oldest story in the his, in the books of history with God and Jesus Christ himself, Jesus Christ will be the, the biggest antisemite?↗

1:35:47Speaker 4No, actually, there's a good theory that he might have been a Pharisee.↗

1:35:51Speaker 5oh, that's actually go down that road. You know what, you know, let's↗

1:35:56Ian Malcolmnot even start down that road. The rabbi, the rabbi, no, no, no, no, yeah, we're, we're not even gonna go down that one, but just to clarify one more time, yeah, so your suggestion is that the oldest forms of hatred in the world are men against women, and then it's just man against Jew.↗

1:36:09Speaker 4I didn't say man, that was also your words, but, you know, I don't know what you all just made me say. So if it's not man, I want to make the point. No, hang on, hang↗

1:36:15Ian Malcolmon. Yes, yes, pause. If it wasn't man, who was it that was hating on the Jews? Was it squirrels? Was it...↗

1:36:20Speaker 4Oh, you had the Egyptians, you had the, had the Romans, you had the Seleucids, the majority of the Babylonians, the↗

1:36:25Ian MalcolmEgyptians, men or are they some of them? What↗

1:36:30Speaker 4the Are you trying to say that we're not human? No, I'm trying to say we're not human. And then you asked the question about,↗

1:36:37Ian Malcolm"Yes, I'm gonna have to mute you." I'm not making any such statement. It was you who just said that it was not man who hated on the Jews, and then I asked, "Who was it?" And you said it was the Egyptians. Now, inherent in that statement is you saying that the Egyptians are either all women or that they are some form of non-man. That's just the logical progression that you're trying to put↗

1:36:59Speaker 4no, this is like, you're trying to say like all of humanity hates, hated us, and that's not accurate. And, and, and, and your, in her, in your question is the idea that Jews are not human, which is, quite incredible. No,↗

1:37:16Ian Malcolmno I know that there are rampant degrees of paranoia in certain groups of people. I would like you to please explain how in anything that I've suggested, I've said that Jews aren't human, because that's a very egregious comment and claim to make. So please substantiate that or reclaim your statement and take that back, please.↗

1:37:37Speaker 4Yeah, I think it's very simple. I think anyone can understand. You say "man hates Jew." So usually when, people would use "mankind," they mean humanity. So you're trying to paint us as being inhuman. And then you mentioned that antisemitism↗

1:37:52@malleusigWait, did he, did he mute? No, he's, he's not muted. No, he's not muted. Okay, right. But the, this is, the thing is, the, the guys like this is, is they're such fast, they're such fucking like used car salesmen, they talk so fast, you have to slow them down and break in sometimes, and I'm really glad he had an audio misfunction right here, because We went from, no, I was literally, we went from literally, wait, from him making the absurd statement that anti-Semitism is the second oldest hatred in the world, completely leaving out hatred of snakes, right? Right? like big cats, other people, the cold, right? All the other things that came way before Jews, completely on the fact that Jews hated non-Jews well before the non-Jews caught on to it and started hating them back, right? No, no, no. It's the second oldest hatred, just take my word for it, right? And then from there, then he slipped up and he said that the anti-Semites aren't people. And then he's like, "Wait, wait, that's not what I said. The Egyptians hated us first, and like, they're not people, they're not men. So he's like, "Wait, wait, hold on a second, what are you trying to say here? So the Egyptians about- That's not what I said. And everyone can review it later. Yes, no, no, no, Literally recapping what you said, alright? And then, and then he tried to turn it around on you and say, "You, you're saying that Jews aren't human." We literally said the inverse thirty seconds ago, alright? So, Yates, I wanna give you a chance to redeem yourself here. I want you to explain Slowly, so the Gentiles can understand. Okay, well, let him go, let him↗

1:39:35Speaker 5go, 'cause I don't wanna make him like have to support show being taken over. We have people waiting in the request. I know. But so go ahead, you can just- Yeah, so I wanted to, let me just move on.↗

1:39:43Speaker 4I wanted to make the point, I wanted to respond to Michael. He was asking, asking for the definition of antisemitism. Antisemitism mutates constantly. for wha-why, and what-- In the beginning, we Jewish state in Israel, and, they anti-Semites attack Israel, in a roundabout way to attack Jews. Yeah, and don't you think some of the people that ninety percent of Jews in the world support Israel? So when you say the Zionist this, the Zionist that, you're actually attacking Jews.↗

1:40:17@uncutspeechSo just criticizing Israel in and of itself is a, is a, according to you anyway, this is a full indictment of all Jews. So in, in equal terms are all of the, you know, all of the atrocities that Israel's responsible for, if they were to Hold responsible for those as well?↗

1:40:34Speaker 4No, but ninety percent of Jews in the world support Israel. It's↗

1:40:37@uncutspeechnot logically↗

1:40:38Speaker 4consistent,↗

1:40:44@uncutspeechright? It's code, it's code, it's code. So we think that Jews are-- Oh, so only ninety percent are accountable? Right. Oh, sorry, sorry, ninety percent. W-w↗

1:40:55Speaker 4Yeah. So you don't, you don't believe in, the individual responsibility? He's saying, he's saying that apparently, and I'm using your logic here, Yates, I don't know if you're, if you're tracking↗

1:41:04@uncutspeechhere, but I'm using your logic. You're the one that accord-- that doesn't believe in individual responsibility, because you're saying that if you were to criticize Israel and Israel's individual actions, that that's an indictment on all Jews, you know, if we were the ones to, say this about Israel, right? If You know, your logic would be consistent, you say no. How does that make sense? No,↗

1:41:29Speaker 4no, no. I'll, I'll explain, I'll explain what I'm, you're trying to get me into a binary again. No, I'm just, this is- So I, I, I'll, I'll take you in the↗

1:41:33@uncutspeechmiddle, okay, okay. How you hold an illogical position on this, I'll give you a break, I'll give you a break.↗

1:41:39Speaker 4I'll give, I'll pretend you're arguing in good faith and let me explain it. Okay, go Okay. So of course, not every individual Jew, Jew, you know, I, I don't know if I'm not Israeli, I'm not responsible for the actions that, Bibi's government would make or Naftali Bennett or Na'aman Bagan or anyone. In that sense, I, I don't vote in, you know, a, a, and all the rest of it. I'm, I don't pay Israeli taxes. Right, but we couldn't,↗

1:42:02@uncutspeechso we're not associated with them, but↗

1:42:06Speaker 4we couldn't fight them. No, no, but wait, wait Is that, you know, it's become, un-until lately, it's become unfashionable to attack Jews outright. We had Hasso, you know, it became very unfashionable. So what they started doing was attacking Israel, because it's the only Jewish state. And, the fact that many Jews support Israel, maybe even higher than ninety percent. Not, not because of the, the behavior. It became, it became a code word Listen, this is very important for your audience. Zionists, no, it's, it's because it's insane.↗

1:42:38@joann_marieYou are be- you're, you're saying that it's because it's Jewish and not because they are committing genocide. It's literally because they are committing genocide and because of the apartheid. It doesn't have anything to do with being Jewish.↗

1:42:50@uncutspeechYeah, I mean, you're just making an assertion. You're just making an assertion. Yes, you're just making an assertion. See, that's why there's some guys demonstrating. Can you demonstrate, prove the theory that you have at all yet? Like, how does-- All I hear, right, from, from ninety percent of the anti-Israel side, most of them, right, are criticizing just Israel's actions, not got-- it's got nothing to do with them being Jewish or anything like that. I mean, I'll grant you that there's a small percentage of people that,↗

1:43:20@uncutspeechSure, but ninety nine percent of Israel criticism is people that aren't anti semitic, you know, by your standards. They're just criticizing Israel's actions. A lot of these people that are criticizing Israel, didn't even know that where Israel was on a map, that it is the Jewish state, et cetera, et cetera. A lot of these people post October seventh, don't even realize like what Israel is. So for you to say that that makes them anti semitic and they hate Jews as well, when a lot of them don't even really know that it's like No religious state, right? Like most of them just are looking at what Israel's doing and they're saying, "Nah, that's, that's pretty awesome, and↗

1:43:57Speaker 4also,↗

1:43:57@uncutspeechalso, we don't wanna spend any more money there."↗

1:44:00Speaker 5Partners make a good point because if you look at the outside person looking in that doesn't have any anger, hate, or even knows maybe a single Jewish person, looks at the actions of Israel and looks at what he sees and maybe criticizes that, is that making him anti-Semitic? He has no hate in him and just, and just, and just- says, no, I don't like those actions being taken. That's it, simple as that. Yeah, yeah, I was just saying that. So what is the difference? Israel is obviously an↗

1:44:26@thomas984634784ethno-religious state, it's also a settler colonial one.↗

1:44:30Speaker 4No, it's neither. Twenty-one percent of the citizens are-- Yeah, yeah, yeah. And I ask you the question. Theodor Herzl, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael, Michael Because when you apply a double standard, when you say that only Israel is committing genocide, or, or Israel isn't allowed to do that, so only Israel is doing that, when you apply double standards, that's when it's antisemitic. And this is, this is the lie that a lot of↗

1:45:03@malleusigJews will tell you. It's like, "Yes," oh, sorry, go ahead, Michael. But like, I'm gonna call this out when you're done.↗

1:45:08@rectheregimeYeah, I mean, Israel is the one that operates with a double standard, after all. They utterly ignore international law in all respects Consequence, and then they clamped on on our speech when we criticized them. You saw that recently there was a police sent to somebody's home in Miami Beach over a comment they made on, about the mayor and his support for Israel's actions in Gaza. You had the police showing up. So we're not so much mad that, you, you know, we're-- And first of all, I'm not saying that Israel's the only country that has committed genocide or isn't, even isn't the present committing genocide. It's the only country that's robbing us to pay for it. That's what I'm saying. We're being extorted to pay for Israel's genocide. That's what I resent. I don't care if Israel exists or not. That's not my business. My business is not being robbed as a taxpayer to pay for this criminality.↗

1:46:08Speaker 4Well, Michael, let me say this, Michael, I don't consider, robbery per se, but, I agree, Israel should have its autonomy back, it should be independent. Israel doesn't need American aid, which actually is more like a quarter of the country's income. Thank you, Joanne. Be honest, it's a liability. Can you, can you let us know? Especially when you have Joe Biden in office. Yeah, but we have Joe Biden in office, aid isn't, isn't no longer so great. And that's why BB↗

1:46:37Speaker 4Ten years. Okay. And, Bibi himself has said, "Let's wean off the aid. recreate our own, military-industrial complex." And that's what Israel needs to do. And with Israel was a lot stronger in nineteen sixty-seven. Okay. Before we go any further, I↗

1:46:51@malleusighave to call out this fast talker on one of his tactics because it's a classic one. Every Jew does it, that I've talked to. Every dishonest one. I don't have any↗

1:46:58Speaker 4tactics.↗

1:46:59@malleusigI'm not devious. I don't play tactics. I don't play↗

1:47:07@malleusigSo far, has been what they teach each other to say. It doesn't have any reference in the real world. This shit about being the second oldest, so, so, so once again, I'm not human, I'm just like an, an automaton, right? Oh my God. They tell each other.↗

1:47:36Ian MalcolmIt, it So Rabbi Malia Yitz is making general statements about noted patterns based on his lived experience, and you have gone from, "You're calling me an autonotom," to, "You're saying that I don't have a brain," to saying that I'm subhuman. Those were the accusations that you just made in a series of about fifteen seconds, and that perhaps would lend itself to people like myself to try to build their worldview on data. I would look at that data point and I would say, "You know, I've been told..." Well, the Jews tend to be paranoid, and perhaps what you're doing is demonstrating paranoia. A little↗

1:48:14@malleusigbit of paranoia.↗

1:48:15Speaker 4Well,↗

1:48:15Ian Malcolmwell, Ian, Ian, I'll tell you this, Ian, if, if I'm↗

1:48:18Speaker 4paranoid, you↗

1:48:19Ian Malcolmmade it that way. Wait, wait Which is another trope around the Jewish people, this idea that I, the, the, the cry out in pain as they strike you, right? We see this continuously. Woe is me! You know, it's-- I saw an article that actually was-- This is a real news article that was basically saying that the victims of the genocide of the Palestinians were the Israelis who had to deal with the psychological damage that was begotten as a result of them conducting the genocide. Can you imagine if an inmate in prison told the judge, perhaps, in the courtroom, "Actually, Your Honor..." Do not pity the victim that I murdered, do not pity their family for the loss of their loved one. Pity me, because I now live with the nightmares of reliving that moment. That's crazy.↗

1:49:27Ian MalcolmAnd the weirdest part about it is, not just that somebody who probably wasn't Israeli Jew thought that, but that they then thought it would be a good idea to write an article about it. That there was no ability to reflect. And not only from that one individual, nobody in the entire organization said, "Hey, guys, this might be a bad look." That's crazy. And so when Rabbi is sitting discussing, perhaps, again, tropes about the Jewish people, don't be paranoid and immediately slur him as if he's saying that you're subhuman. That's a ridiculous suggestion. Is it subhuman of me to say that on average people from Mexico are about five foot three?↗

1:50:11Ian MalcolmIt's actually about five feet if you're just averaging across the, the both genders. Does that, is that me calling them subhuman? No, that's the statistical observation in reality. Nothing, there, there, there's no reference of that. And then when he made that accusation that you were perhaps acting in a paranoid fashion, then of course you went to the "woe is me" victimhood complex. So there's other things that I could suggest around schizophrenia and other psychological impairments that seem to manifest themselves at an overrepresentative fashion within the Jewish community, but please stop embodying them. And as a final little point on this subject, what I found very curious Because I'm often accused of saying that Jews act as a monolith. That's a critique of my worldview, is that I seem to believe that there's a group of people acting in coordination, even if I can prove it. I get critiqued for that. I, I say in every space, it's not all Jews, obviously. But that's the accusation that's made of me. But what was very curious, yes, is you then said that because almost all Jews support the nation of it-- Israel, that critique of Israel is critique of the Jewish people. So I'm curious, which one is it? You don't have to answer this question, 'cause I wanna go back to the conversation you're having with Rabbi Malley. But which is it? Because it seems like either way you get to play victim. If you critique and criticize Israel, then because all Jews support Israel and act as a monolith, well, then you're attacking all Jews. That's your suggestion. But if I then turn around and say, "Well, it seems to me like a lot of Jews are working for the global interest of the Jewish people in Israel," you call me an↗

1:51:45Ian MalcolmWhy is it that these inconsistencies manifest themselves in almost every conversation or debate about these subjects? Is it perhaps something that's an inability on the intellectual side? Is it a complete immorality and willingness to lie in the moment, regardless of what the consequences will be? That's what is really difficult about these subjects, and it's why people today could read that book written by that Austrian painter, and when it comes to his description of, let's say, debating a Jew, you'll find some really wild parallels to what he writes and then what we see in these cases. And so, yes, in all sincerity, I'm trying to help you here. Don't perpetuate stereotypes if you can. But perhaps that would be like me saying to another group of people, "Don't be violent. You make my point for me." And then they turn around and say, "I'ma get you, bro." Right? Don't do that which I would anticipate you to do. It just furthers my point and it furthers the belief likely from the audience that the points that we're making in these spaces have validity. So, Rabbi, I apologize.↗

1:52:55@malleusigNo.↗

1:52:56Speaker 4Okay, okay, okay. Number one, we don't have to be victims anymore, that's why we have the IDF, okay? Part of Zionism, Zionism is- Wait, what the hell? Why is my mic↗

1:53:04@malleusigmuted? No, let him go, let him go for a second. I get to go. Let him go for↗

1:53:09Speaker 5a second so we can get this whole point done↗

1:53:11@malleusigwith. All right, go ahead, Rabbi. I wasn't done, like he literally interrupted me to accuse me of calling him a subhuman. But real quick,↗

1:53:17Speaker 5Ian, fantastic point↗

1:53:18@malleusigby the way, Jews, Zionists do it as a way of time. For, for everyone else, they need to know what you're doing. What you're doing is you're using what they call the three Ds. Alright? Jews teach each other the three Ds. The three Ds are delegitimization, demonization, and double standards. And what they do is they go out and tell you, "You're allowed to criticize Israel all you want, as long as it doesn't cross the line into Semitism and into antisemitism," and we know it's done that when it touches on↗

1:53:51@malleusigone Material in any way that is like, like significant or meaningful, they will find some tortured, over legal reasoning to say that you've touched on one of the three Ds Oh, you can't accuse Israel of genocide because other countries are committing genocides, and that means you're holding Israel to double standard. You can't accuse Israel of being a colonial state because Europe had colonies, and you're not accusing Europe right now in the same breath, which means you're holding Israel to double standard. And they will literally use their tortured logic to ac-- to attack any real argument you make And they'll let anything that doesn't have any real meaning or significance slip through and use that as the token "okay" criticism, okay? It's, we know what you're doing, and we're not gonna let it happen.↗

1:54:39Speaker 4Okay, that's your opinion. The taxes in Israel are too high, for example, that's legitimate criticism. There's plenty of legitimate criticism of Israel that anyone can make. I could happily make a whole slew of them myself. You can talk about Bibi's apparent co-option, you know, there's a whole lot. But I won't get into, internal Israeli politics, I imagine most of you are unaware of them.↗

1:54:59Speaker 4well, look, here's, here's the deal, okay? It is double standards that do count? And, you know, you're looking, looking, why would↗

1:55:08@uncutspeechdouble standards even matter, yet? Like, if I hold the position that it's okay for America to be a colonial power, why would it matter? Like, why does that-- This doesn't falsify our argument at all. Like, a double standard or, or hypocrisy, for that matter, these aren't logical fallacies. These things, like, can be true and Israel can still be a scumbag, colonial, you know, international law-breaking, artificial, fake state, right? Like, this idea that because↗

1:55:35@uncutspeechExist, you know, and I'm not saying that it even does, but if it did, it doesn't make our argument untrue. Israel's still doing these evil things. It doesn't really matter. Oh, we're, we're definitely not saying that. So what?↗

1:55:48Speaker 4You're basically saying, your↗

1:55:49@uncutspeechargument essentially, adds up to, well, who, it doesn't, so what Israel's doing these atrocities? look over here at, this other colonial power that's also doing atrocities. That's what your argument↗

1:56:00Speaker 4is. Yeah, I, I find it↗

1:56:06Speaker 4Yes. Everybody's still focused on Gaza, but nobody's focused on Iran. You know, about--↗

1:56:11@uncutspeechWhat do you mean? What do you mean the whole entire media cycle's been focused on Iran? First of all, first of all, yes. I don't know if you're living under a rock or if there's good internet where you are or whatever, but the entire media cycle's Iran, okay? Like Gaza hasn't been in the news cycle on any of these, on any of these channels you mentioned for like months at this, really since that whole ceasefire thing. Like the Gaza thing↗

1:56:32@uncutspeechis kinda-- I also want you to get over, get over, get over. In terms of the Somali fraud and all this other stuff, we've got midterms coming up, we've got Iran, we've got the Iran thing going on. Now, here's what's interesting about this, this Rabbi character. Can you stop? Can you stop? Where, where did↗

1:56:49@malleusigyou get your speaker? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Resist the urge to jump in and over-talk. Let him finish. Because↗

1:56:54Speaker 4he's a fake Rabbi.↗

1:56:56@malleusigLet him finish.↗

1:56:57Speaker 4Oh no, he found me out, guys.↗

1:56:59@malleusigOh shit, I'm so sorry. Yeah, let's just grab a- Is that a statement on, on the human or subhuman nature of rabbi- All rabbis are fake rabbis, okay? I hate to break it to you, all rabbis are fake rabbis. I'm no different.↗

1:57:13@uncutspeechBut yeah, yeah, the point is that, a-and this argument, this argument not only that you're presenting, this argument that you're presenting isn't only a non-argument, but like it's just completely wrong as well. Gaza isn't even the main sort of news thing anymore, right? So this is, like, CNN and BBC, they don't talk about, that's all they talk about, all they're talking about is Iran now. Gaza's like more of an afterthought now. I don't know, like, let's see, where are you living right now? Let's see↗

1:57:38@uncutspeechDominican Republic. You, you, you know you're in the US, so if you're watching the news, you're on the US. He's never been to Israel. Yeah, I bet. But anyways, yes, do you understand this point that like, even if it were true that there's other colonial powers, that it's not, you outta here, Michael?↗

1:57:54@uncutspeechDid you↗

1:57:54Ian Malcolmwanna go back? But the point↗

1:57:55Speaker 4I'm making Yeah, he's still there. Hang,↗

1:57:57Ian Malcolmhang on, Yitz, hang on, Yitz. I, I want Mr. Or Dr. Rechtmuller to be able to jump in if he wants to. Yeah, anytime he gets the floor, I'll- Yeah, I just wanna jump↗

1:58:04@rectheregimein. I'm gonna have to take off in a few minutes, but I, I just, you know, one hundred and eighty-three human rights, humanitarian, and, international governance organizations, one hundred and eighty-three of these organizations declared- The rampages in, Gaza to be a genocide. So are they all antisemites? And, also twelve Jewish Israeli scholars have declared the same, and nine non-Israeli Jewish scholars. So I guess they're all antisemites. Okay, so that--↗

1:58:39Speaker 4So, so Mike, Michael, there are much more anti-Israel, anti-Israel resolutions in the UN than, than our member states combined. And that's why Trump- Why? Why, why? Why? Why? Why? Because it's an army of spies. Because it's an army of spies. And that's why Trump- No, it's because of their horrific behavior in the UN.↗

1:59:00Ian MalcolmYes. I love- Wait, wait, I apologize, Unsewer. yes, I want to ask you a question. So what, can, can you list off three atrocities that Israel has conducted over the last twenty years? Can you just give me a list of three atrocities that you find abhorrent that Israel has participated in?↗

1:59:19Speaker 5Oh, so before, before you go, before you go, Jits, because oh my God, it's like the Jits pace now. Lou and Frances, hang tight. I don't know, Joanne, we have one more slot open. I don't know if you can- No, we↗

1:59:31@joann_mariedon't. Oh, we don't. We don't have a- You can drop,↗

1:59:33Speaker 5you can↗

1:59:34@rectheregimedrop me down. I'm gonna take off, guys. But I just wanted to point that out and, thanks for having me and, take care. God bless you. Lots of love to everybody. Please give a big follow to Dr.↗

1:59:43Ian MalcolmReynolds. Thanks, Michael. Also give a, a follow to Asa Pacal, the wonderful work that he's doing. He's out there on the front lines trying to bring about real change↗

1:59:59Ian MalcolmBye.↗

2:00:00Speaker 6Okay, I can give you two names off the back of it, but we could go to Stein and Yigal Amir. These are two Jews who committed murder, one killed the prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, and,↗

2:00:18@malleusigno↗

2:00:30Speaker 6No, no↗

2:00:38Speaker 6He, he didn't, I, I don't think he killed any Jews.↗

2:00:40Speaker 7No. Baruch Goldstein, yeah, he massacred Palestinians praying in the mosque, and, that one black Nigerian Jew who called me a goy last time, his profile photo for the longest time was Baruch Goldstein. So this is how sick these people are. Wait, so they put like a big↗

2:00:56@joann_mariealtar that people go worship there because of, it's literally insane.↗

2:01:01Speaker 6And the second one is the guy was already dead, so there's nothing we can do to criticize him, like he Nothing, nothing. Are you saying elves or↗

2:01:11@malleusigArabs? Elves. Elves?↗

2:01:15@joann_marieIt's Palestinians.↗

2:01:18Speaker 6No, no, don't↗

2:01:18Ian Malcolmdon't don't don't talk about elves. Am I crazy? Y-yeah, it's the rabbi Malia started referring to Jews as elves, would that make you happier or sadder?↗

2:01:27Speaker 6Are we going to have a serious conversation or are we going to come across like a scammer? Please don't, yeah,↗

2:01:31@uncutspeechyeah, don't make a joke like, "Are we gonna have a serious conversation?" Because if it's gonna be a con, so I'll just leave it. Okay, we've been trying to make it easy, make all these crazy, fucking, retarded statements, so don't blame us for making jokes. Here, here, here's the statement,↗

2:01:41Speaker 6here's the statement I wanted to make. This group, instead of focusing on Jews constantly, 24/7,↗

2:01:54Speaker 7you↗

2:01:57@uncutspeechNo, no, I promise you, you, you're not. All I'm saying is, is we shouldn't focus on criticizing the state which you benefit from us not criticizing. Why the fuck would we listen to you? You're also retarded. You don't even know like what the news is. Iran, Iran, America, why, why would we? You don't even know how much we talk about Iran or any of these other things. Have you been in the, have you been around the Q spaces recently? It's mostly about Iran and shit, right? And by the way, really, let↗

2:02:26@uncutspeechWe don't wanna talk about any of Israel's involvement in any of what's going on in Iran, right? We wouldn't wanna go there, would we? Did he, no, no, no, listen, listen. Oh, no, no, no, no, no.↗

2:02:33Speaker 6What are you demanding? The Iranians or something? Aren't we so high? The waiting, the waiting Israeli flag. Isn't↗

2:02:40Speaker 7the whole world waiting? Isn't the 1930s where you just tell us to go and die in a war in Germany for↗

2:02:53Speaker 6you or die in Iraq twenty years ago? So, so↗

2:02:56@malleusigNow he's trying to weaponize American, literally, he's trying to weaponize American death against us to get us to don't make more American deaths. He's gonna reduce↗

2:03:04Speaker 7taxes throughout Europe, and don't even forget about the hundred and seventeen thousand Americans that died in World War One so that you faggot Jews could win Palestine from the Ottomans. You guys seem to forget that. Where the fuck are all the World War One memorials, huh? Why aren't you paying for those? Not a single↗

2:03:20Speaker 6American died. Not a single↗

2:03:23Speaker 7American died. A hundred and seventeen thousand Americans died in World War From the Ottomans, you fucking retarded. World War One had nothing↗

2:03:31Speaker 6to do with, oh yeah, let's move on 'cause it's inconvenient. I don't wanna talk about↗

2:03:35Speaker 7World War One and the Balfour Declaration because we had a pre- plan to invade Palestine going back to eighteen ninety seven, if not eighteen twenty nine, with a Rothschild to buy off the Ottoman Empire. Okay, okay, let's- Listen, listen, listen,↗

2:03:47Speaker 6listen. Let's get, let's get serious here, okay? The British, the British were in France.↗

2:03:53Speaker 8Holy shit. Oh my god. Okay Set the room here. I'm just gonna be that asshole right now. And, and, and I mean, listen, we can go into history and, and, and, and...↗

2:04:04Speaker 6Lou,↗

2:04:05Speaker 8just, just...↗

2:04:05Speaker 6The, the Brits and French care about themselves. Oh, okay.↗

2:04:09Speaker 8I didn't ask you to speak for a second. I, I understand the frustration. I, I↗

2:04:12@joann_marielove Lou's crash out.↗

2:04:14Speaker 8I know, me too. I love the frustration. But how are we looking if we, we need, like, why are we crashing out on this guy, right? Let's, let Let's, let's, let's do this, in a way where we kill 'em with kindness, right? And that, and that's hypothetical, obviously, okay? but let's just, reset the room. who was next, Joanne? And then Lou, Lou obviously is next, and then, and Jits and stuff. But let's kinda, if there's two people talking, let them talk it out. I don't need to hear four different voices at the same time. I'm just gonna do this for Ian 'cause he's too nice.↗

2:04:53Speaker 8Joanne, who's next? Was it, Lou and Jits or was it Carl and Jits or Rabbi, who is it? Oh, I mean, I↗

2:05:00@joann_mariehave Brittany.↗

2:05:03Speaker 6I, I have to go, so I just wanna make my final point.↗

2:05:06@joann_marieLiterally no one is stopping you. Just stop↗

2:05:09Speaker 6and stop. Just make a statement↗

2:05:10@uncutspeechand then, then just make an exit. Like if↗

2:05:12Speaker 6you're↗

2:05:13@uncutspeechgonna leave and you don't wanna actually debate anymore, right? Then just fuck off, just leave, right? I don't care about the goodbyes and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Alright.↗

2:05:19Speaker 6The, the British and French had their own imperial interests, they didn't care about the actual national, national interests. Just, just, just leave. Just basic history And so the exception won't work too far, and you can just take the course online and get a good head start from a real Semite.↗

2:05:40@reddestmapleBye-bye, it's a little bit crazy to me that he always thinks that we want him to stay. This is a real Semite telling you bye-bye. No, no, no, Semite can change languages, not ethnicity. So, you're done. Good luck with that. Yeah, I speak Aramaic and Arabic. I'm a Semite. Fuck off. I am the real Samite. No matter how you look at it, and you're not one, it's, you aren't a Samite. I am the real deal Samite. I think I might have communicated↗

2:06:11Speaker 6with you once. Did we communicate in a different space?↗

2:06:13@reddestmapleNow,↗

2:06:14@uncutspeechnow, do↗

2:06:14@reddestmapleyou wanna have a serious conversation? I don't know, but I think your time is up today.↗

2:06:18@uncutspeechYeah, yes. Are you gonna leave or do you wanna have a serious conversation?↗

2:06:23Speaker 6no, just, just Berzelius was fine to say that. No, that's all we↗

2:06:26@uncutspeechneed. We, we stop with the explanations. I don't know what we need. Yes, you are, you say, no, no, no, that's fine. End it right there. It's very easy, right? You have no link↗

2:06:34@reddestmapleto the land, you have no link to the language, you just, you're not, period. You can't speak, you can't speak Arabic,↗

2:06:41Speaker 6you can't speak Hebrew, you don't, whatever↗

2:06:47@reddestmaplepeople preserve their Masoretic, whatever Years ago. No, even your classic↗

2:06:56Speaker 6Hebrew writing is↗

2:06:57@reddestmapleAramaic language. Everything about you is stolen, my brother. So either, either contribute to the pronunciations or the forms as↗

2:07:05Speaker 6they were in the days of Moses. Goodbye from the real Sumerians. That's how I know. Goodbye. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. Bye, Sumerians. They know who belongs to the land. Ask your people. No, no, no, no, no. What are you talking about?↗

2:07:26Speaker 7You've literally said you've never been there. What the fuck is this we--↗

2:07:29@uncutspeechYou're probably like a convert or something, anyway. You're riding way too hard right now. You're probably-↗

2:07:38@reddestmapleLook, no, no, no, no, no. I'm a conservative. Let me bring↗

2:07:44Speaker 7some↗

2:07:45@reddestmaplereality to it. Yes, yes, yes,↗

2:07:47Speaker 7let me tell you something. I'm a conservative. Let me↗

2:07:49@reddestmaplequickly,↗

2:07:49Speaker 7quickly,↗

2:07:50@reddestmaplequickly- No, no, But let me, but let me, let me make↗

2:07:54Speaker 6a point. Jews fought and died for civil rights, Mr. Liu. Jews died on behalf of civil rights. Yeah,↗

2:07:59@reddestmaplethis is the point. Kids, cut out the slavery, kids. Guys, guys, guys. I see humanity, us humanity, the eight billion of us human beings on this earth, have come to the, to an agreement that Someone's land is where their ancestors are buried. It's like a secret code we all agree on. Everybody's ance- wherever your ancestors are buried, that's your homeland. Now, where are your ancestors buried, kids?↗

2:08:32@reddestmapleGrandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfather. And if you go, if you go way back, everywhere is Israel.↗

2:08:38@uncutspeechMy ancestors are everywhere, the spiritual Jews. Go, go back, go back to the Levant. Stop it, dude.↗

2:08:44Speaker 6The decay for the patriarchs. You're really going to the Levant where you belong, unlike you, unlike you, unlike you, who needs to go back to the US. Where is your great↗

2:08:54@reddestmaplegrandfather buried and the one before him, where? It goes back to Poland, but if you↗

2:09:02Speaker 6go beyond,↗

2:09:05Speaker 8here we go, here we- Fucking go, Jace, how the fuck are you speaking? Through the meat. How are you?↗

2:09:15Ian MalcolmWell, if it was the same thing yesterday, he has magic↗

2:09:17Speaker 8powers. What's going on here? And, and what the fuck? And don't speak. Nope. Yep, hand up. Look how quick he is. Ashkenazi. I can speak whenever I want. no, well then you gonna be on a timeout. Because isn't this funny, my friends? We're speaking to the people that wanna tell people that they're anti-Semitic for having a dunk against Israel or criticizing Israel. That they are anti-what is anti-Sem-what is a Semite? What is the word in anti? Semetic, semetic. It's meaning you have to be a Semite and that you're anti-Semite, you're against Semites. If you're Jewish and you're not a Semite,↗

2:10:09Speaker 8then you are literally, believing in Judaism, right? You, you took on the religion of Judaism. That doesn't mean you are a Semite. It doesn't mean that you are Jewish. You just believe in the, you follow-↗

2:10:26@joann_marieIt's Will from Rubberbanding.↗

2:10:28Ian MalcolmYeah, I think he is.↗

2:10:30@joann_marieHi. One, two, nine.↗

2:10:32Ian MalcolmYes, we, yes, we appreciate, yes, we appreciate your attendance, we appreciate all of your ideas. Full of ideas. we will give you thirty seconds and then we're gonna move on to the next speaker and we're gonna stop with the happy hour Jesus.↗

2:10:44Speaker 8Now, I mean, he's even more discredited for being a Polish Jew. Jesus. Now, I mean, he's even more discredited for being↗

2:10:49@joann_mariea Polish Jew. Sincerely. You're,↗

2:10:49Speaker 7you're rubber A really qu- really important question, a really important question, kids. Who's more Jewish, you or Milowkowski, your prime minister of the country you've never been to?↗

2:11:03@uncutspeechCan't hear him. You guys speak Hebrew, Yiddish, Polish, Czech, Polish, Czech, Polish,↗

2:11:07Speaker 6okay. Okay, look, look, the, the, the Semit, the Semitic classification concerns, languages, not, languages. And it's actually inaccurate.↗

2:11:17@uncutspeechOkay, that's↗

2:11:17Speaker 6all, Tom, would it just simply be Judeo? Okay, that's actually, that's all, Tom. This is, this is like saying↗

2:11:21@uncutspeechwhenever, whenever you, this is like saying whenever you call someone English, that, that's an, actually, that's a language.↗

2:11:27@reddestmapleYeah, that's actually a language. If you learn Hebrew, if you learn Hebrew, you become↗

2:11:39Speaker 6The concerned languages, okay. Hey,↗

2:11:40Ian Malcolmso, so yeah, just out of curiosity, is, is to be Jewish, you believe that it is a, a race slash ethnicity or it's only a religion?↗

2:11:49Speaker 6It's an ethno-religion, so others can join.↗

2:11:52Ian MalcolmOkay, others could join, but explain the ethno portion of your ethno-religion suggestion there.↗

2:11:57Speaker 6Yeah, so like I said, if you go back in my ancestry and, other, other Jews, there were some other, Jews in the space I noticed who popped up. They are Polish. You should give them the microphone. They're not Jewish. You should let them speak. Okay, let me make my point. Okay, if you trace back in my ancestry, their ancestry, you eventually get to the, to the, to, you get to the Levant, to And you have the story of Moses and the, the Exodus. So, so,↗

2:12:22Ian Malcolmso, so, what would you, what would you say to, in that sense, to the ethnicity? Oh boy. What would you say to Jews that claim that it isn't a race or ethnicity? What would you tell them?↗

2:12:42@malleusigIs he talking? It's a double mute, yeah. It's not. He's not giving us the Romans to lose again. Double mute, yeah. He just loves↗

2:12:49@joann_mariethrowing Romans.↗

2:12:52@malleusigOh my God, yeah. He's holding it. Wow. Crazy. Wow. Well, I mean,↗

2:12:56Speaker 8after, after, after all, the↗

2:12:58@uncutspeechRomans did a lot for them, didn't↗

2:12:59@malleusigthey?↗

2:13:00@uncutspeechThat's true. They did. It would, if, if it weren't for, if it weren't for them kicking them out of the, the, you know, that original spot down there in the desert, then they wouldn't have gotten↗

2:13:13@uncutspeechYou know, all those productive industries that they ended up taking control of. Well,↗

2:13:17@malleusigColin, one of my favorite arguments is when this Jewish guy was on a podcast and he said, "Well, if we hadn't killed Jesus, he wouldn't have completed his mission and you wouldn't have Christianity." So, like, I-- And I don't want you-- I'm not expecting you guys to thank us or anything, but, you know, hey. And I'm like, "Well, okay, then that makes sense, 'cause..." You know, if, if the whole thing hadn't happened, then Jews wouldn't be anywhere near as popular as they are today, and they wouldn't have control over most of Europe and America. So, Rabbi,↗

2:13:43Ian Malcolmis that not cry out as they strike you, that's, celebrate us for striking you? Basically, yeah.↗

2:13:49@malleusigSend us a thank you card for doing it, essentially, right?↗

2:13:53Ian MalcolmWell, I've decided because Yitz was, either glitched or he didn't wanna push the button, either way, I'm gonna push the button and move the conversation forward because I'm getting tired. Oh, thank God.↗

2:14:03@malleusigIt's like, and↗

2:14:03Ian Malcolmso with that, lots of other wonderful hands, lots of people requesting, and what we're gonna probably do, I had, I had responded to, diligent Denison saying that I would join his space on Trump, and so I wanna honor that suggestion that I threw out earlier. So we'll probably run this another fifteen minutes or↗

2:14:22Ian MalcolmI, I do wanna make sure that everybody gets a chance to kinda run through some of their ideas. And so with that being said, let's go down and, and we'll kinda wind through. I know Brittany hasn't had a chance to contribute yet, so we'll go to Brittany. Then we'll go to Jubin, and then we will come back up to Mr. Rabbi.↗

2:14:38Speaker 9Hi, Ian. Hi, Joanne. Hi, both. I, I've been sitting here just taking notes and trying not to have like five pages worth. So just got a little, a little wild there. but yeah, I'm-- one thing I found quite interesting was the, the way the space started, Ian, you were talking about, the, the low IQ anti-Zionism and the dimensions from,↗

2:15:10Speaker 9Tate and all the, his, positions as far as like crypto and everything else, and I feel like a lot of this is kind of like an inverse question, you know, like, is it low IQ anti-Zionism or antisemitism or is it? Low IQ or low,↗

2:15:37Speaker 9trust or whatever like, threshold, Zionism and Semitism, 'cause what the, what the frick is even Semitism anymore? Like, it, it's just a concept that's, so loose, it's such, A mask of whatever they want it to be in any given moment. It has no legal, like, binding definition. There's no de-definition. There's no boundaries to the definition, like, which is what a definition is.↗

2:16:14Speaker 9and it just seems to be like, undefined messianic thinking that kind of like alters every generation, and it's all to just siphon- resources off each gen, each generation. It's all like, to bankrupt the future kind of nonsense. And that's kind of like where I see like the tates with this and a bunch of other people is this Invest in crypto, invest in crypto, invest in crypto. Well, we, we know that's kind of going nowhere right now,↗

2:16:47Speaker 9and it's kind of like becoming a way to siphon more and more of like maybe gold or silver or whatever else, like real resources off of current generation, like current, each generation kind of speaking, like, and it just seems to be like a The concept of Judaism or Semitism or whatever the frick the mask is anymore, I don't know what the hell it is. Like honestly, it's Talmudism would probably be the most accurate way to put it because it's legalizing morality. It's departing from like what you feel in your soul, what you know is right and wrong. It's, it's, it's separating you from that and, and telling you that↗

2:17:37Speaker 9you're a god within yourself if you just tell yourself you're god, and you're above everybody else, and you're separate from them. You don't need to worry about how your actions impact others. It doesn't, it doesn't matter anymore. You're better than them, and you're something else entirely, and don't even worry about it.↗

2:17:58Speaker 9And that's how they kind of like create this whole like, I don't need to look in the mirror, I don't have to reflect on my actions, my actions don't matter, I'm righteous in and of myself, because I am now God. You know? Like, I don't know if this sounds like kind of ludicrous, but in like listening to, Yeats talk and ramble about- Double standards, especially I just found he was just left and right,↗

2:18:32Speaker 9contradicting everything he was saying, who's setting double standards for himself and then not applying that, aren't not applying them to himself and applying them to everybody else and like saying that you're violating these double standards and you're setting these double standards for us and we're just righteous. As individuals and also as a people. But, and you can't judge us indi- as individuals or as a people, because that's antisemitism as a whole. It was just absolute lunacy. I just... There was just no coherence. I don't know, sorry. I, was taking notes for a while.↗

2:19:19Ian MalcolmNo, you're, you're, you're totally okay, and, and, just take a moment, collect those notes, we'll come right back to you. I just wanted to make a quick little PSA. apparently diligent Denison isn't feeling too well, is going to be postponing his space until tomorrow, so I want to wish him, nothing but, but the best in his recovery. I hope he gets some rest, relaxation, some tea, and I always advise Manuka honey. And, so with that being said, just to try Just wanted to suggest.↗

2:19:51Speaker 8I'm not fucking leaving! The↗

2:19:56Speaker 7show goes↗

2:20:00Speaker 7on. The show goes on. The show goes on. That's exactly what I was thinking. I literally played that in my head. Let's go. Britt, you gotta bring the↗

2:20:04Ian Malcolmenergy back.↗

2:20:15@reddestmapleJoann, do you see my hand? Can I come in?↗

2:20:18@joann_marieYes, go, go for it, Reid. And I'm so happy the space is gonna keep going. Okay.↗

2:20:24@reddestmapleMe too, by the way. thank you, Ian. Thank you. That, that's amazing. Yeah, and↗

2:20:28Speaker 8everybody down in the waiting down there, just be patient. Yeah. Yitz, you are back too, so you're gonna wait. Continue, guys. Speaking of leaving, and apparently Yitz↗

2:20:38Ian Malcolmis not leaving. That goes↗

2:20:40Speaker 7to show you. Yitz also played that track on his phone before I come back. It's always so good to↗

2:20:49Ian Malcolmsee you, my friend. Excited that you're here, glad that you're with us, humbled that you're, gonna contribute to the, the conversation. For anybody that's out there, if you're enjoying what you're hearing, feel free, share out the space. Hopefully we don't get those technical glitches. We'll keep this thing running and keep the lights on as long as everybody's having fun. So, lots of love to all you in the listener panel. We'll make sure to go through everybody and anybody that's requesting a mic.↗

2:21:12@reddestmaplethanks. Look, I, I so appreciate you, Ian. I love you, man. Thank you for all that, what you do, everything you do. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I have two quick points. I don't wanna take a long time, but Look, yesterday I saw that these guys in this van, I, I don't know a lot about them. I see bits and pieces of videos, and I know, you know, they're, they're, they, they have the courage to, to just sing that song and just all that. But what, what I saw afterwards with the video of all of them going into one of them's ho-house, I think it was one of the Tates, was very concerning. And, and I'll tell you two things about what I saw. So the last ten years↗

2:21:55@reddestmaplethe, the Talmudic liberal culture that was shoved down our throats to an extent where, you know, f- women are, have been weaponized through feminism, man isn't no longer man, woman isn't no longer woman, all that, that, that, and destruction of manhood, like The, the man was like destroyed, especially the white man, you know, the toxic masculinity and all these terms. I think so we went somewhere to the extreme left of the reservation, and then some people came out, a few young men like if Winters and the States and the other, another couple, where they just spoke some sanity, right? Some sanity, back to some normalcy. So they got a huge following. But guys, if you're, if you're below thirty-five and, and you think these guys represent anything that is good in terms of manhood, let me tell you, I have been around, seriously, I have been, I'm, with the richest of the rich, Europe, everywhere, and I don't speak as a Lebanese with my culture. When I saw people coming into Tate's house And the camera went three sixty.↗

2:23:18@reddestmapleI can tell you from any culture universally, that is a whorehouse. That is the lowest of the low. If that guy was my friend and I enter his house, then the next day I wouldn't tell anyone that this guy is my friend. This is pimp no more, like this is terrible. And so if you think this is an example of healthy manhood, please reconsider. If you think this is an example of healthy women sitting like, like sitting on a supermarket shelf Please reconsider. And again, I'm not speaking as a Lebanese from my culture, universal culture. This is degeneracy to the top level. So these people, yes, brought some sanity. Fuentes brings some sanity. Fuentes is not an archetype of manhood, by no means. And if you think he's being a Trojan horse, that's not that guy. That's not, that's not that guy. I've been around, that's not that guy. These people believe in serving themselves, and this is-- and now they're at a point where they're being used, and I'll tell you how they're being used. I think it was Theodor Herzl or the first prime minister of Israel, some of them. They believe that anti-Semitism, quote unquote Is their, is their best ally hatred of Jews or criticism of Jews or making Jews feel unsafe, which doesn't take much effort apparently, is the best recruitment tool for Israel. It's the best thing that came in parallel with Zionism. So Zionism is the idea to take the Jews to the land Hatred and, and criticism of Jews is the best thing to feed into Zionism, so Jews go back to Israel. So when they allow these people to sing that song, when they prop these people up, they allow them to get there, and they, they, they are using them to bring about this low IQ antisemitism, whatever you wanna call it that, because they wanna recruit more bodies to Israel. They are Are losing people, people are flying away from Israel. people with, with means have left already. The project is failing. The best way to re- to re-boost, to boost that project again into life is to scare the Jews out of Europe and the United States to go back to Israel, and these idiots are being used for that. So that's one thing. The other thing, these aren't a good, e-example to follow in terms of manhood or the- The view of life or the view of women or the view of marriage or the view of anything, and that is what concerns me with these people. If these people can be idols and influencers, we have a problem with young men. That's all, thank you.↗

2:26:29@joann_marieThank you so much, Raed, and I loved everything you said. Jovan Skar, go for it!↗

2:26:39Speaker 10Thank you, Joanne, and thank you, Ian, for running this space. I've been thoroughly enjoying it, and I'll be a couple of minutes, really enjoying the kind of discussion, on this space. And, yeah, I mean, listen, why is there such an increase in antisemitism? Well, it's very clear because in the last two and a half years, Israel have been committing a genocide against the Palestinian people. You know, and people have got eyes today, so we can see through our mobile phones the crimes that they are committing against the innocent Palestinian people. Is it antisemitic to see with our own eyes something that is happening, or is it the fact that there's actually the data that we now have? You know, I often talk to family members and friends And I'm called on a regular basis an antisemite. But what I've noticed, and this is the interesting point, is my younger↗

2:27:37Speaker 10friends and younger family members are with me, Gen Z, which I understand is the group of people who are around twenty-five and under Are basically awake to what's going on, so that is a fantastic thing for us brothers and sisters, because they're awake and can see what is exactly going on, whereas people like my parents who sit and watch the BBC and Sky News continue to get the propaganda. And the final thing that I want to say is, I've noticed recently this word Anti-Semitism becoming less powerful to the Jews because basically now what I'm seeing quite often on my feed, and I don't know if others on the panel have noticed this as well, but I've noticed these random Jewish accounts, I don't know who from Adam these people are, I know it's all part of the algorithm and everything that that happens, but they're now using Jew-ish Hatred, Jew hatred rather than antisemitism. They're recognizing the word antisemitism is too soft for them now, and this is an interesting thing. So that's a sort of final thing that's more of a question to the panel. So thanks for having me, Opie and Chairman.↗

2:29:00Speaker 8Thank you, thank you, brother, thank you. let's knock out some hands and then we get the people up here. So we had parody Jeff up here, so parody Jeff, do you have anything to add to the topic, brother?↗

2:29:16Speaker 8Okay, because I would like to go to Sir Askana. I'm here, I'm here.↗

2:29:20Speaker 6I'm here. You hear me? I am. Hi. Yes.↗

2:29:21Speaker 8I'm↗

2:29:23Speaker 6listening, I'm listening. I've been listening until now. So, yeah. All right. But,↗

2:29:33Speaker 11yeah.↗

2:29:35Speaker 8Well, well, let's go to Suresh Kannan real quick. Welcome, Suresh.↗

2:29:40@joann_marieFollow, follow the Jeff that he, he got his account looked, like two days ago, so he's building up and it's pretty cool, so thank you. Yeah,↗

2:29:49Ian Malcolmand, and Suresh, I'd be curious- And also I wanna say thank you,↗

2:29:51@joann_mariethank↗

2:29:51Ian Malcolmyou, thank you, thank↗

2:29:53Speaker 12you. Everybody, everybody, everybody, give Jeff a follow. Everybody, give Jeff a follow.↗

2:29:58Ian MalcolmAnd, and kinda sidestepping where that might go, Esquino, I'm just kinda curious for your thoughts on this, let's say, latest development in the influencer scene. I know you always kinda cut through a lot of the BS with a lot of these accounts and maybe the legitimacy of their, their following or their intentions. I'm curious for your thoughts on the Fuentes, Myron, Andrew Tate, what did we call it, the, the Avengers of the JQ going to the Miami nightclub.↗

2:30:28Speaker 12Oh, that shit's hilarious. you basically take, take the gayest motherfuckers you can find, put them in a club full of girls, and then parade them and tell everybody how to be tough guys and go loot and plunder every other country 'cause we're American tough guy alpha males. Fuentes likes catboys. Tate has a fucking vagina.↗

2:30:50Speaker 12Clavicular, who calls themselves after a clavicle, I don't even wanna think about what the fuck this guy does at night. A bunch of better faggots, like just, you know, wreaking everything rotten in male toxicity and branding it as white nationalism. This is insanity. Like, I, like, I think I'm on, I feel like I'm on fucking, what's it called, candid camera, and this is all a joke, and I'm waiting for it to just, like, like maybe, maybe I tripped my brain and this is all a hallucination. That's what I'm hoping is the situation. So, that's where I'm at with it, with it.↗

2:31:23Ian MalcolmYeah, no, doesn't it really feel like, and, and I'm curious for your thoughts on this, Escondre, you always look at the things at the macro level, it feels like post-COVID we really did find ourselves in some kind of alternate reality, and that, that up is down and left is right and right is wrong, all that kind of stuff. Am, am I crazy or did the insanity accelerate massively in the last, five or ten years?↗

2:31:50Speaker 12Look, I don't wanna be the bringer, the harbinger of bad news, you know? But I'm gonna point out the obvious here. People are much more retarded today than they were, fucking, a couple years ago, dude. Like, even the MAGA retards, the cult fucking psychopaths, a couple years ago, during COVID, they'd never allow the National Guard to come in the fucking state, they'd be like, "Fuck you, get out!" Now, they're welcoming it, dude, and they're like, "Yeah!" Shoot lesbian Trudeau in the face, it's okay. Who cares about her rights? It's all good. Let's justify ICE that is fucking basically IDF. They've become the enemy. So everybody, everybody's retardation in paradise has made them become the very enemy they thought they were fighting to begin with. And again, I'm hoping that I checked my brain, I turned off the camera, and I'm hoping that I'm psychotic. That's like the best case scenario that Espinoor is a fucking retard hallucinating and it's just It's me and it's not the whole rest of the fucking world, so that's where I'm at.↗

2:32:49Ian MalcolmNo, it's, it's very well stated and, and, I often say that every day I wind down and I think, "Boy, I, I hope I'm wrong about my assumptions on the world," and then I wake up the next day and I look at the headlines and it just further affirms all the things that I've been thinking for a long time, which brings me back to this-↗

2:33:10Speaker 12Yes, sorry. And I'll say one thing about that, about a real truther, you know, for and for a real truther on the Fox. I spend every day of my life hoping that I'm wrong and I'm, I'm retarded, whereas all these cloud chasing, bait chasing, MAGA losers, grifters They're feeding the lie and they're hoping on that 0.1% chance that everything's gonna come together like a fairy tale. They're doing the complete opposite. They're waking up every day trying to validate retardation, and I'm trying to convince myself that I'm retarded. We're in different fucking worlds, guys. These people are nothing like us.↗

2:33:44Ian MalcolmYeah, no. And, and, and on that, I'm kind of curious, right? This idea of the, the low IQ antisemitism, right? You often look at the, the world and you kind of analyze the, the, the meaning or the spell behind some of these things. I'm curious for your thought on the evolution that has been antisemitism, antisemitism or Euro-antisemitic, which evolved into Jew hate, which became Jew hater, which is now low IQ antisemitism. That's the latest little buzzword. I'm curious what kind of You might, assess is, is being pushed on everybody.↗

2:34:18Speaker 12Well, again, it's, it's, like everything, right? It's, it's, it's an IQ test, right? It's like how, how easily can I convince people of something that is blatantly false, that it actually means today the exact opposite of what it actually means when you read the definition, right? So, it's literally the inversion. Again, it's a spell, they're inverting reality and brainwashing people to propagate this lie. And by us not conceding to lies, we are the outcasts in the spell, and that's why we are looked at as the outcasts. Again, it's, it's, you know, it's as simple as that. So it's a spell, it's an inversion, it's mockery, it's all of the satanic laws rolled up into one little fucking word that the Jews whip around, right? And what makes it worse is that there's many things are happening at the same time, right? This is something I like to tell people to understand. The Jews want, you know- To, to, to some degree, they need the world to turn on them, they need the world to hate them, and they need one or two thirds of themselves to be sacrificed for the messiah. So the word antisemitism and the push is being used as a lure to have Christians, nationalists, and Muslims rise against something in a controlled environment where they can target, monetize, monitor, and turn this into metrics so they can control our movement because they need us to rise against Judaism as well for their prophecy, so they're gonna do everything in their power to control that, and that's why I like to expose the JQ as well, because it's infiltrated with people that aren't who the fuck they say they are, and they aren't there to help you guys. They're there for a completely different reason that has nothing to do with anything that you stand for. So, so, you know, a Jew's a Jew, a demon's a demon, but somebody who's a traitor, nobody fucking likes traitors, and that's what I'm here for↗

2:36:08Ian MalcolmYeah, absolutely. And that, that's, folks, that is for sure, Esconor, always cutting through the noise. make sure you give him a follow if you aren't already. and with that, let's go down to, Mr. Luke Corbett.↗

2:36:24Speaker 13Yeah, so I came in a bit late and I caught the end of Yitz's tirade there. Based on what I heard from him, I have but one postulation to offer you, in this space so far. I'll get to Tate after this, by the way. to me, he sounded so comical and parodic that immediately I thought he was rage baiting. I mean, like Yitz Goldber, fighting against the- Luke, is this your first time↗

2:36:49Ian Malcolmhearing the one and only Yitz?↗

2:36:51Speaker 13Yeah, yeah, that's what I was gonna ask next. Like, has anyone known him before? Like, oh,↗

2:36:56Ian Malcolmthis, this is, this is, this is par for the Israeli course.↗

2:36:59Speaker 13Like, he's not, he's not a, a caricature? He's↗

2:37:04Ian Malcolmnot joking. He's been, he's, he's stayed in character for quite some time now.↗

2:37:11Speaker 13Yeah, okay. Alright, well that clears it up. And I, I mean, that's believable because they are, some of them are like that. So, alright, anyways, as for Tate, the clips I saw from Tate today alone, made me laugh unrelentingly. I already knew he had Jewish managers for like years since his advent in twenty twenty-two, but since he visited that club, with the Manosphere coterie, oh my goodness, like, have you seen the clips? Like, this is from Tate, I'll give you a quote.↗

2:37:42Speaker 13I don't think it matters what Israel does. When, when you have all these young men out here who have no hope of building a good life, they'll find someone to blame. This is another quote. I gotta be careful talking about the Jews because I don't wanna go to jail. Okay, and then here's the one from his lawyer. To be clear, Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate condemn antisemitism and any glorification of Adolf Hitler. Free speech isn't a license for hate. There is a clear line between expressing views and promoting hatred. Andrew and Tristan reject hatred in all its forms. So we have this pedantic, like, woman speak lawyer language. And they're basically saying that they're kissing the feet of Jews. So this is your red pill alpha influencer, this is your Matrix challenger, the guy with Jewish managers and simping for Jews on the daily, running a prostitution cam girl ring. I thought being rich meant you could say whatever you wanted. In America, by the way, spoiler alert, it does. They could easily just go to America and say whatever they want, and they did, by the way, they were in Miami, where there's still freedom of speech, at least for the time being. so- Here's the corollary I'm gonna offer you. If they're saying these things, it means that they're doing it on purpose, they're doing it deliberately, they're not being coerced, they believe them, they believe these things. They are simping for Jews because they're sympathetic to them. And I mean, that could raise a litany of questions, and my research into the Tates is somewhat limited because I really don't think that Andrew Tate matters that much in the grand scheme of things. I'm more into politics and history, I think he's more of like a Manosphere guy but he does have an effect. But yeah, that, that's the corollary is that I would say that he is definitely believing the things that he says because he isn't being coerced. Free speech exists, especially if you're that powerful.↗

2:39:34Speaker 13he is definitely, he definitely has the agency to be making these statements. But yeah, I'll, I'll pass, I'll pass the torch here.↗

2:39:42Ian MalcolmNo, love it, Luke, and always very measured in your, perception and, and delivery, and so always appreciate that, especially in these rather contentious, topics. And with that being said, to bring in another voice that's always, of the utmost reason, let's look to Mr. David Niche. Gonna be very curious for his thoughts on this, and, and David, just to reset the conversation. And, Luke actually did a wonderful job 'cause I used that very quote to kick off the space, which was from Andrew Tate, basically suggesting that a lot of people are disenfranchised, they are struggling, and so they're just going to look for someone to blame is the way that he shrugged this off, and he attributed to rising awareness to perhaps, he didn't talk about Jewish supremacy, he said rising antisemitism is likely a result of just that, people looking for somebody to blame. I'm, I'm curious for your thoughts on that.↗

2:40:37Ian MalcolmThis was from Andrew Tate.↗

2:40:39Speaker 14Well, I would disagree with our friend with regard to what Andrew Tate really believes. If you have no character and you wish to predate for money, you are in line with the Jewish supremacists. It doesn't require sincerity. You know, there is no honor among thieves, but there's a complicity among them. And here is a person who preys upon young girls, whose fame is doing just that. So the idea that he would align himself with Other people who drop bombs on children isn't surprising, but there is no principle involved. I don't think there is no ultimate falsity involved. I just think it's, hey, they rub two coins together and make a baby, I rub two coins together and make a baby. That's what we specialize in. We do it at the expense of character. Of course, we're in line. A complicity of sentiments sufficiently advanced becomes a de facto conspiracy, and that's what we're talking about here, people with zero character.↗

2:41:46Speaker 7You know what's interesting about Tate really quick is that when he, remember he went on Pierce Morgan literally like two weeks after October 7th? he actually called it a genocide back then, but then they started slapping him with more accusations and more lawsuits. And what I found out is on the ADL's web- Instagram page, at least, probably their website too, January 2024, so we're talking about three months after October 7th, maybe three or four months, they actually put, they featured Andrew Tate On there, on the ADL's website. And then everybody was just literally in the comments being like, "What does Andrew Tate have to do with antisemitism?" And then Jews replied saying, "Oh, it's obvious that Andrew Tate talking about the Matrix is referring about Jewish control of everything." It's like, "Whoa, buddy, he never said that, but probably, but you're paranoid, and maybe rightfully so, but I don't know what Andrew Tate has to do with antisemitism."↗

2:42:35Ian MalcolmPeople could say, "It's really frustrating how the group that controls the media pushes all the And then a Jew comes out and says that's anti-Semitic, and it's like, wait a second, what is that saying about the power structure, which actually is a nice little segue. I, I might end up biting my tongue for doing this, but, I saw Alfie, who I've seen before, in the request, and because I like to honor, the idea of free speech for everybody, even those that I disagree with. we brought him up, and, we're gonna be polite, or at least try to. but Alfie, I can't notice that you made the comment that it is low IQ antisemitism to suggest that the Jews might have been involved with 9/11, which you're welcome to debate lots of people up here on the panel about that one. But the one that I find more interesting is the notion that you said it's low IQ antisemitism to suggest that the Jews are overrepresented in the media. And boy, can I take you to task on that one, but perhaps I won't because I feel like it would just be, "This is LeBron slam dunking on the kindergartner." And so instead, Alfie, what we're gonna do is we're gonna make this interactive. You get to pick first and foremost anybody on the panel, to debate the subject on representation in the media with, and then I'm just gonna ask that you, first and foremost, define the word over representation to make sure you're aware of what it is that you're even trying to suggest. So, ready↗

2:44:09@downfalconOh, hello. Yeah. Sorry, I↗

2:44:13@joann_marieactually,↗

2:44:15@downfalconI actually left the room when you, when you brought me up. I didn't expect to get brought up, to tell you the truth.↗

2:44:20Ian MalcolmAlright, so here's what we're gonna do. I'm gonna be, I'm gonna be extra kind and presume that you just, no, I'm gonna mute, I'm gonna mute, I'm gonna mute you. I'm trying to speak here. You're in my room. So you're gonna conduct yourself like an adult if you're able to, and if not, we're just gonna say goodbye. So I'm going to take for face value, I'm gonna presume you sincere, and that it just so happens that we brought you up right as you walked back into the room, and despite not hearing any of the question that I asked, that you immediately started with, "Oh, wait, oh, I'm, I'm here. I didn't hear..." Which is kinda silly, because if you hadn't heard what came before, you probably wouldn't have done that. Right? That's a logical conclusion that anybody would be able to arrive at just by observing the world. But I will just presume that it's complete happenstance that that was the series of events and we'll take you at face value. So here's the question, you get to pick who you debate this topic with, Alfie, which is the idea of Jewish overrepresentation in the media. One, you get to pick between debating with Wolf, David, Lou, Rabbi, or Tom, because I know again that me doing this with you is just gonna get embarrassing. I don't wanna do that to you. So you get to pick who you debate the subject with, and then I ask that you define the word overrepresentation to make sure that we're having an honest debate about a subject that you understand. So please, pick the person that you're going to debate with, and then define that word.↗

2:45:55@downfalconWell, I wrote out my response to that notion. Can, can you read that?↗

2:46:07@downfalconI can paraphrase. That's totally fine. That's totally fine. The question presupposes that Representation in any field, in any profession, should be proportional to the population. No, it↗

2:46:20Speaker 7doesn't. We're just stating it as a fact. Carry on.↗

2:46:27Speaker 7What? I said, no, there's no should or shouldn't here. We're just stating it as a fact. Carry on.↗

2:46:34@downfalconYou're stating what as a fact?↗

2:46:37Speaker 7I said, we aren't stating that the proportionality should Be in line with the population or the demographic statistics. We're just saying that it is this way, so carry on.↗

2:46:53Speaker 8Are you comprende? Do you understand? Redest du Englisch? Kannst du mich? Do you understand the language you're speaking? God, go on. I,↗

2:47:01@downfalconI don't understand what you want me to say. It's like I, a-again- I want you to carry on.↗

2:47:05Speaker 7I just said carry on. I told you what, what I want you to say. Just read your fucking notes,↗

2:47:08Ian Malcolmdude. Read your↗

2:47:09Speaker 12fucking notes already.↗

2:47:12@downfalconLike, why don't you calm down?↗

2:47:14Ian MalcolmAlfie, is it unreasonable to be- I am fucking belligerently obtuse in a conversation. I am↗

2:47:20@downfalconcalm. I mean, I'll read it. I'll read you what I wrote. I said, "Another example is the idea that Jews are represented,↗

2:47:33@downfalconthat Jews are represented disproportionately in things like media here in the US." Do you dis- Alfie,↗

2:47:38Ian Malcolmdo you disagree with that statement?↗

2:47:44@downfalconI don't think it has a question to do with proportionally or disproportionately. No, no, no. But we're asking the question, the word↗

2:47:50Ian Malcolmoverrepresentation or disproportionate, we can leave the good or bad, if it is a good thing or a bad thing, we can leave that at the door to try and make it very easy for you. Are Jews disproportionately overrepresented within the media?↗

2:48:07@downfalconIf your parameter for disproportionally, if you're using a parameter of based on their percentage within the population, then I suppose you, one can make the argument that they are overrepresented. Okay, hang on. You, you included the↗

2:48:21Ian Malcolmword, I suppose. So we're gonna try to break this apart just to make sure that you understand language, okay? What does overrepresentation mean? Can you give us just a textbook definition?↗

2:48:33@downfalconOverrepresented?↗

2:48:35Ian MalcolmYes. Can, can you define that, please?↗

2:48:36@downfalconWell, it's, it's, it seems context dependent. Like, what do you mean overrepresented? No, it's not↗

2:48:42Ian Malcolmcontext dependent. Oh my God, I'm asking you to define a fucking word, and you're basically saying that to define the word requires the context in which we're defining it. Can we,↗

2:48:51Speaker 7is yellow a yellow color? I'll↗

2:48:54Ian Malcolmbe all right. Let's just take his↗

2:48:55Speaker 7definition. He gave us the definition, it's the same one we're agreeing on. Go ahead. Okay,↗

2:49:00Ian Malcolmoverrepresented, over You wanna define overrepresentation by the word overrepresented. That's totally fine. Are Jews overrepresented in the media?↗

2:49:10@downfalconI don't know. I suppose an argument could be made. No, no, you--↗

2:49:13Ian MalcolmOkay, you just said you don't know and you suppose. It's a very yes or no, factually based question or answer. No,↗

2:49:19@downfalconI'm not gonna do that. No, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna-- Okay, then↗

2:49:21Ian Malcolmyou're not going to participate in my adult conversations. Why would I allow you to? This is my room, Alfie. You're not going to come into my civilized space, and you're going to say, "No, I don't believe that the sky is blue." And then I say, "Well, can you define blue?" "Well, it's not yellow." Nope. "Can, can you define↗

2:49:46Ian Malcolmblue?" "Well, are we spelling it B-L-U or B-L-E-W, 'cause that's a different word, blue?" "You could mean blew up." It's unbelievable. That we have this in every conversation. It's either you are being belligerently obtuse, and if you aren't familiar with what those words mean, it is to basically say that you're obnoxiously conducting yourself as if you don't understand what we are discussing. Now, if that is the case, get the hell out of my room. Why would I want a fool in the conversation? It's a very unreasonable thing. Can you imagine if I allow a five-year-old into a nuclear bomb facility?↗

2:50:35Ian MalcolmYes, tell us, five-year-old, what should we do to make the bomb more efficient? well, hit my bubblegum? Excuse me? What are we doing here? Bro, what the fuck? I asked you for a basic definition of overrepresentation. overrepresented? Yeah, fine, yes. You're going to use the word to define itself. Deal. We can deal with that. I then said, "Are Jews overrepresented in the media?" Well, I suppose that you could make an argument that perhaps the-- Why? It's a yes or no question. What is two plus two? Well, I suppose that we need to primarily define what it means to add something together, and do you want me to say the answer or to write it on my chalkboard? And send you a picture, and if I do, does it need to be a blue truck? It's insufferable, Alfie. And I don't know if you're just trolling. What I just did is to troll. It is to mock. That is what I tried to do, to mock your presentation of what is either you trolling and gaslighting, or you merely being so intellectually incapacitated. That a basic yes and no answer is way too much to ask. Now, the thing that's most frustrating about what we notice in these conversations, in particular debating Jews, is that both, it appears, that we see a demonstration of low IQ that is mixed with extreme hubris, the hutzpah Which basically says, "I know everything, but don't ask me to define a word because that might crack my fragile ego." It's really frustrating. Now, I'm gonna ask-- I'm actually not even gonna ask you the question. I'm gonna give you the data points first. I could go through the ten most prominent, powerful media empires. Almost all of them, at the very top, have Jews. That includes even Amazon, yes. It's not Jeff Bezos, it's Andy Jassy, who's a Jew, who's the CEO. That includes Apple, like in Apple TV. No, it's not Tim Cook, it is Arthur Levinson, who's the chairman of the board, who appointed Tim Cook. Now we could go through virtually all the other media empires, but guess what? We don't need to. We could literally just go to one company. We could go to Skydance. Which under David Allinson has now made the major acquisitions of Paramount and seeks to purchase also Warner Brothers. Now those two companies alone, coupled with Skydance, are thirty percent of American media. Choose or two. Let me say that again, choose or two. That is an overrepresentation of fifteen↗

2:53:31Ian MalcolmX that one company. Now, if you're going to say that they're not overrepresented given what I just told you, you're either lying or you're a fool or you're trying to redefine a word to fit your narrative. So I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to ask you two questions. Number one, are Jews overrepresented in the media? If your answer is anything but yes, I'm going to remove you from the discussion because at that point you're being either a liar or a fool. I am then going to ask you if you can name↗

2:54:05Ian Malcolmany prominent media empire that isn't run by a Jew, because that should be really easy, shouldn't it? Shouldn't that be very, very, very easy to find, given that it's two percent of society? And if it's not, then I don't know how you couldn't easily arrive at the answer to the first question that I posed to you. So go ahead, Alfie. Let's, let's hear some more brilliance.↗

2:54:34@downfalconWhy are you so afraid of me?↗

2:54:36Ian MalcolmWow. And with that, I'm literally jumping you from the stage. Wow. There's, there's the red herring.↗

2:54:44@malleusigIt is, it is the human. Not, it's unbelievable. It's just narcissistic about the stereotypes.↗

2:54:48Ian MalcolmIt's unbeli- it's just every stereotype. We saw Yitz come in here. He said that you were accusing him of being subhuman, Rabbi. That was, rather fair and just. I↗

2:54:58@malleusigkind of am.↗

2:54:59Ian MalcolmThen he played victim complex, and then we have this individual come in who wants to try-- It, it's, it's like debating with Bill Clinton's lawyer. Well, it depends on the definition of "is." Does it, or is there literally Bill Clinton's ejaculate on Monica Lewinsky's dress? Is this really difficult to litigate? Do we have the evidence right here? How do you suppose it happened, Your Honor?↗

2:55:26Speaker 13Yeah, they're, they're pedantic, they're Pharisees. That's why you can't debate them like that. No, it's not pedantic at all. It enrages the average person.↗

2:55:33@malleusigWell, that's the thing though, is like, they're all-- like, the argument always comes down to, "Well, you see, technically I'm right if I redefine three of the words in your statement, right?" But that didn't happen↗

2:55:42Speaker 14here.↗

2:55:44@malleusigNot here. Here, yeah, because here↗

2:55:51@malleusigI find↗

2:55:52Speaker 14this, I discovered this long ago in philosophical debates.↗

2:55:55@malleusigYeah.↗

2:55:55Speaker 14If you can't drag someone down reason road who doesn't wanna go, you know, and this is why I love Nietzsche's quote of, "He who is convinced without reason is seldom swayed with it." They just give you spaghetti legs. Now, notice this, and I've done this in person, where they say Well, one could say, "Whoa, whoa, and I'll stop them. Listen, in the spirit of Socrates, I care only about your opinion. It's the ultimate compliment, by the way, for someone to sit you right in front of them and say, 'I would like to un-understand the contents of your mind.' And what's their answer? What's the snake's answer? I don't wanna tell you. But one could say, "No, no, no, I'm not interested in what one could say. Oh, you know, Heidegger once said, Now, I only care about you and your opinions, the contents of your own mind. That's all that matters. Why won't they tell you? I know. I will tell, I will tell you, because the ignoble exchange nomenclature in the way criminals change disguises, they change the meaning of words. They have no falsity to truth, because they have no falsity to humanity. Truth is the natural concomitant of goodness. If you don't want the good, if you don't pursue the good, if you don't pursue the innocent, if you don't defend them in kindness and equanimity, if none of these things mean anything to you, if you truck in ability, if you make money at the expense of humanity, then you are going to be the enemy of truth, and anybody who thinks they're ever going to get these people to reason with you, it's never going to happen. You're always gonna get the-- Again, Ian's paying him the ultimate compliment. How do you define- Tell me what this is, and it's-- Well, one could say, one might say, "I'm not going to go there." Well, then why are you here?↗

2:57:49@malleusigWhy aren't you here? There's another, there's another dynamic at play here that, that I've encountered so many times. They- They have this idea of themselves as everyone, every single one thinks they're Machiavelli, right? They think that they're like, they're planting, they're pla- they're planting these clever little rhetorical traps you fall into, right? And it's like, when they talk to anyone else, they think everyone else is, is doing the same thing. One of the, the best exchanges I heard was Ian ask one of them a question with an obvious and uncon- it was like, "What color is the sky? " Right? And this is one of my favorite things to do with them, is if, if you ask them a question with an obvious and incontrovertible answer that no one is gonna have a different opinion on, right? Like something like, you know, is Android bad? What's two plus two? Right? What happens is Like, yeah, what's, what happens is their brain goes looking for the trap and they can't find it, and when they can't figure out what the trap is that you are, like, supposedly laying for them two or three levels deep, they freak out and they refuse to answer the question because they figure that anything they say is gonna make them fall into your trap So nothing is about the truth with them, it's just about like playing these games to kind of like rhetorically, you know, trap people. And if you, if you ask them an obvious question that's not a trap at all, they-- it's like when you tell, when you, when you tell them, when the woman says like How do I look in this dress? And you're like, "Yeah, you look really nice." And she freaks out, and she go-- her brain goes looking for every way that could be misconstrued as an insult. They're doing the same thing, 'cause you're just asking them a simple question, and they freak out 'cause they can't figure out what your trap is, because you have none, but you know they're doing this because they will then bend themselves into logical contortions to avoid answering the obvious question. And it's one of the most entertaining things on this app.↗

2:59:48Speaker 14Right, because it's possible that the truth that the line of questioning is leading to comes at their expense. It was Socrates who invented cross-examination, and you couldn't have, I think, the greatest work of literature of all time, the dialogues of Plato, you couldn't have that masterful work if there wasn't someone on the other side that would submit themselves to cross-examination. They would say, "Yes, I think that," and they would say, "And so do you also think this?" "Yeah, I do think that." And then at the end comes the, "Okay I think this and thinks this, maybe there's a contradiction. Well, the person on the other side of that, if they're noble, would want to find, would want to uncover the contradiction within their own soul, their own mind, their own thinking. Not so with these people, because the contradiction doesn't matter as long as they win. In a zero sum game, and again, this is out group psychopathy, you lose because you're not part of the group, they win. The truth, the truth must be the first thing to sacrifice. So notice, I just want everybody else, please don't emulate this. Don't think that you can out-clever these people, because you can't. You know, Jean-Jacques Rousseau is right, you know, there are enough, n- enough clever people in the world. Submit yourself. Be earnest, be humble to the truth. You know, the way that we win is by barrowing towards the truth no matter what. When they call us antisemites, okay, assume that I came from the bowels of hell and said what I said. Isn't it still your work To tell me, is what I said true or false? If truth is your enemy, how can you be good? That's what we're left with. That's the question that makes them uncomfortable. That's where we're winning because in the long stretch of time, the truth wins out.↗

3:01:34Ian MalcolmYeah, I couldn't agree with you more, and I'm, I'm just kind of curious. I, I mean, look, Rabbi, you've had these types of debates, a long time with this, with this power structure, right? what if anything can be done differently for anybody? 'Cause I, I presume there has to be somebody in the audience somewhere, perhaps, that, that maybe thinks I was either unreasonable or perhaps thinks the individual I was speaking with was reasonable. I'm curious for your thoughts on that and, and what perhaps we can do to The dynamics of those debates, if we can call it↗

3:02:04@malleusigthat. Oh, like I think, honestly, my favorite thing was, I tend to give them more time to hang themselves. That's the only difference, I think, between you and me.↗

3:02:12Ian MalcolmAll right, so here's what we're gonna do, and I apologize, so we're, Veritas, we're gonna bring you back up. We're gonna have Alfie Part Two, because yes, Alfie is requesting yet again. But here's what I'm gonna do, Rabbi, I am gonna be completely silent, and I will let↗

3:02:32Ian MalcolmThe word define, I'm going to lose my mind. No, I know. So Rabbi, you, you truth teller, and Alfie can have a, a, a little debate here, however you see fit. No, the reason- If it gets crazy, I will↗

3:02:43@malleusigshut↗

3:02:43Speaker 8you guys down.↗

3:02:45@malleusigYep, I've, I've literally been in discussions with them where you can tell they're not used to getting more than halfway through their argument, and so when they get to the end, they kind of like peter out and start fumbling the ball, and that's actually a good thing for us. Like you can tell a lot of the time, a lot of Jewish argumentation is based around interruption, and this happens within the group as well as outside of it. You listen to Israelis talk to each other, just a↗

3:03:10Speaker 15quick interjection, I know this alpha guy, sorry to interrupt, I know this alpha He's the one that stands firm on the USS Liberty, you know, not being a deliberate, aggressive attack by the Jews, you know, that killed thirty-two Americans plus, a hundred and fifty-plus, service, servicemen were injured. He stands by Israel on that account as well. I've heard him debate as well. He's, yeah, he's claimed like he wrote a thesis or something on it, so this guy delves super deep into one particular issue, so he's like a one-trick pony. Beyond that, he's, he's obviously wrong. I've debated him before, but now I recognize who he is, so it's a complete fraud and, again, time waster.↗

3:03:46@malleusigOkay. Well, what, what I was, what I was saying is if you listen to Israelis talk to each other, they're always interrupting. Interrupting is a part That's why I let them, let them go for a little bit longer.↗

3:04:07@malleusigSo I guess maybe it's Alfie's turn. Is it time for Alfie to talk?↗

3:04:12Speaker 8Well, let's, let Alfie Global Bomb with Truth Tellers.↗

3:04:15@downfalconMy turn for what? Are you guys gonna let me talk for five? All right, stop being↗

3:04:19Speaker 8a fucking victim already. well, that's- No, that's,↗

3:04:22@malleusigAlthea, that's, that's the whole point of this is we're gonna let you, we're gonna let you talk, we're gonna calm down, we're gonna quiet down, we're gonna let you speak and give you a chance, and if he says something that is even is patently false, we're gonna take notes and we're gonna come at it later, okay?↗

3:04:38@downfalconOh, well, if, if By all means, challenge me on it, and I'll defend my argument.↗

3:04:45Speaker 8How's that? And we, and we won't be crying victimhood, so continue, go ahead.↗

3:04:52Speaker 8Alright. Are Jews↗

3:04:53Speaker 15overrepresented in the media relative to their population? Yes or no.↗

3:04:58@downfalconWait, what?↗

3:04:59Speaker 15Are Jews overrepresented in the media, especially the C-suite level with companies like Disney, et cetera, relative to their population, so per capita? Yes or no?↗

3:05:10@downfalconWell, I gotta be careful there 'cause if I give the wrong answer, I'm probably gonna get kicked. 'Cause Ian already said if I give the wrong answer, then give the right answer. Just say whatever you need to say on the↗

3:05:21Speaker 15thing. Since you live in such fear and it's a life-altering, it's a life-altering move to get kicked off of space, and you're living in this fear, why don't you just give the right answer then, instead of bullshitting and gaslighting?↗

3:05:33@malleusigHow↗

3:05:34@downfalcon'bout that? Guys, this, this isn't how we give them Alright, so are you gonna give an answer? Are you gonna give an answer, Alfie? Give an answer. Yeah, I'm↗

3:05:45Speaker 8gonna answer your question. Give an answer to the question. Okay, okay, okay, hang on now. Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, listen, listen, Alfie. First of all, don't talk to Truthy like that, alright? And, Truth, give him a second, alright? Just let him say shit, let him dig his hole, let him do his thing, a-and then we gonna do our thing, alright? Just And, that way we don't have this back and forth and you guys gonna get angry at each other. Alfie, don't, don't cuss at him, alright? Don't do that again. And now go ahead, Alfie, and I'll make sure no one is interrupting. Answer his question and then go ahead. I know, I know, but just let's just move on.↗

3:06:28Speaker 15Bro, bro, bro,↗

3:06:29Speaker 8bro, just, just continue, let's go.↗

3:06:31Speaker 15Did you have a real man crush, huh?↗

3:06:34Speaker 8Truthy, come on, brother. No. Alrighty, too. Just seriously, like, go on, Alfie. Go on, Alfie. Are you guys together,↗

3:06:43Speaker 7Alfie?↗

3:06:44Speaker 8Oh boy. Okay, truth, truth, guys. Listen,↗

3:06:46@malleusigguys, not gonna- Truth. Just let Alfie go. If he wants to answer, let him, let him discuss what he wants to discuss, alright?↗

3:06:55@downfalconMy answer to your question, if I have to, if I have to say yes or no, my answer is no. Okay, so don't↗

3:07:05Speaker 14believe the- Well, let me, hold on, truth. Sir, let me So according to their numbers, isn't aren't they by definition overrepresented? We can get into some other part of the subject afterwards, but it sounds to me like you agree that numerically they're overrepresented, meaning they have a far greater representation in the media than they do in normal society. Is that reasonable to say, Alfi?↗

3:07:26Speaker 14If you're going to say, "I'll be," just listen to the thing that I just said and ask me if it's right or wrong. I, I'll be glad to state it again. I feel like I'm saying, stating it in a very simple way.↗

3:07:37@downfalconWhy, why are you giving him some space?↗

3:07:39@malleusigLet him answer in his own way. It'll become obvious where he stands. Okay. Just↗

3:07:42@downfalconlet me answer the question.↗

3:07:43Speaker 14Okay. Okay. Can you do that? Calm down now, I'm being very calm with you, and reasonable.↗

3:07:50Speaker 16I'm, I'm pretty- Alfie, do you need a pacifier to relax? Okay, okay, I'm just gonna- Guys, guys, guys, let him just go.↗

3:07:56@joann_marieAlfie, just say whatever you need to say, and then we can move on. Three↗

3:08:00Speaker 8people, three, four people jumping in. I mean, I don't wanna roll the red carpet off for you, but please get to your point. Don't,↗

3:08:05Speaker 15don't you homos like your gang bangs? Proof, no proof,↗

3:08:07Speaker 8true Alright, no one interrupt. Let this freaking character talk for a minute, and then we can go on. If, if↗

3:08:22@downfalconyou're going by strictly numbers, then yes, I guess I would say, okay, they are overrepresented, if you're going by numbers.↗

3:08:31Speaker 17What is there no other way to go? What's the other way? Why, okay,↗

3:08:33Speaker 14let's, hold on, let's continue on. Okay, what, anything more? That's good, Alvy. I just, it just seemed basically reasonable to, to point out that obviousity, right?↗

3:08:43Speaker 17Yeah, just to point out, he contradicted himself. First he said no, and then he said, "Well, if you go by the data and numbers, then yeah, it's true." So how do you take this guy's news? Okay.↗

3:08:52Speaker 8Alright, well, I'm not, I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna be- Let's just hear what everyone else has to say so that we can move on. I'm gonna press the mute button, guys. Like, I won't, I'm not, like, listen, I just said, "Let Alfie go for a second," and calling you Alfie makes me feel really fucking uncomfortable. It's like, Alfie. It's like, like you, it's just the name, bro. Anyways, I'm gonna call you L, okay? L, get your, get↗

3:09:22Speaker 8David and L, go ahead for a little bit here, back and forth, but truth, just, just come on, bro, just give it a second. You can bash them all you want after that. Alfi, L, god, this name. Go ahead, L, you have a double mute. No, there's, there's no,↗

3:09:36@downfalconthere's no contradiction. I said, if you're, if you're going to relegate me to a yes/no answer, kinda like Ian wanted me to do, then I'm gonna say no. But if you say, okay, well, based on the numbers, then I'm gonna say yes.↗

3:09:55Speaker 14Okay. Alright. So, I think we're getting somewhere, my friend. So, you're saying that based on the numbers, everybody, I think we can agree, that it isn't overrepresentation based on numbers. Now, it sounds to me like you're saying, but it's not a problem, that there is no problem There's no reason for us to be concerned. Is that, is that kind of where you're, where you're going with this?↗

3:10:18@downfalconI don't view numbers alone as, like when you say, when you say over-representation, to me, over-representation means that there's too much representation. And I don't think you can say there's too much representation purely based on numbers alone.↗

3:10:37@joann_marieIt's not enough. Yeah, I would think that's not what that word means.↗

3:10:41@malleusigThat's literally, okay, again, so this is perfect. Okay, so you let him talk, he spoke, and we found out that his statement is completely illogical. His objection to the idea that Jews are overrepresented has nothing to do with what the word "overrepresented" actually means. It has to do with how he feels about the word "overrepresentation." He doesn't, he feels like if you say that someone is overrepresented in, overrepresented in something, you're saying that there's too much of them, when in reality, all you're saying is that they are represented over what you'd expect. That's it. Doesn't mean they're a problem. That's what they're teaching in a↗

3:11:18Speaker 17gender studies↗

3:11:19@malleusigclass or a law department. Doesn't mean there's too much. It just means they're overrepresented, okay?↗

3:11:24@downfalconDifference in the end, what is the difference between over what you would expect and too much?↗

3:11:29@malleusigToo much means that you have, you have, you want to bring it back down to not too much. That means you have a feeling about it. Proportional to↗

3:11:36Speaker 13a population,↗

3:11:37@malleusigright? Proportional. If you're above population representation, that just means you're above population, that's it.↗

3:11:43Speaker 14Okay, but, but, but Rabbi Althea, black people aren't↗

3:11:46@malleusigoverrepresented in the NBA, there's not too many black people in the NBA.↗

3:11:49Speaker 14But Al, yes, but Althea, I think his question is, how is too much a problem?↗

3:11:56@malleusigNo one's saying it's a problem yet. We haven't gotten to that point. I think that is, are there, I think the censorship, maybe the shitty↗

3:12:03Speaker 17content and also targeting of the youth mind with degeneracy and normalizing things like LGBTQ, which homosexuals like Alfie enjoy, 'cause you like seeing those modern type families where they don't have a lot of sexual- Right. And, and for, for what it's worth, the doc- the doc- the thing that I find↗

3:12:17Ian MalcolmThe thing I find most offensive is that we can't even acknowledge that it's happening. That's the thing, right? That, that's the first piece of this puzzle.↗

3:12:23@malleusigYeah.↗

3:12:24Ian MalcolmAnd the very, the very person who's saying that it's not happening is saying that the reason it's not happening is because he's perverting the definition of the word overrepresentation. I↗

3:12:31@downfalconknow. Well, well, well, you're saying, you're saying it's, More than you would expect.↗

3:12:37Ian MalcolmYeah. Given population. So you're- No, that's, no, that's not what I'm saying. You're redefining the word overrepresentation to fit your perverted logic. Instead, it↗

3:12:46@downfalconmeans more than you would expect. That↗

3:12:48@malleusigone, hold on. Okay, guys, that was- No, it, it, it is.↗

3:12:51Ian MalcolmThat isn't, that isn't what I'm saying it means. Overrepresentation is when something is represented more than the standardized representation of its percentage of the population. Blacks are overrepresented in the NBA and in crime. Jews are laugh Overrepresented in the ownership of the media. For you to suggest otherwise because, well, there's not enough of them, they need to own more. It's like me asking you what's two plus two and you say seventeen because you want seventeen more than you want four. It's infuriating.↗

3:13:21@downfalconI wasn't talking to you, Ian. I was talking to the guy. I know, 'cause I just↗

3:13:25Ian Malcolmembarrassed you again, but thank you. Rabbi will give you more and more rope to continue embarrassing yourself. It's fine. There was↗

3:13:30@downfalcona guy who said to me on the space that it means more than↗

3:13:36@malleusigYeah, that's what it means. It doesn't, I said that doesn't have an emotional context to it. It doesn't have an emotional element to it.↗

3:13:44@downfalconOkay.↗

3:13:45@malleusigAll right. You need it to have one so that you can object to it on emotional grounds, because that's how you manipulate us.↗

3:13:51Ian MalcolmBut Rabbi, Rabbi, to, to aim this one at you, can you please, inform the audience, not this individual, 'cause apparently this is difficult, how objective reality, looking at fact and looking at the actual definition of Words to make statements on reality can't be refuted by the emotional reaction to the fact while being labeled a reasonable conversation. They can't, because like it's, it,↗

3:14:18@malleusigat that point, it's all logical fallacies. So one of the-- Quiet, Alfie, I will mute you or remove you from the speaker panel. One of the, one of the, the most common logical fallacies you see in these discussions is, is the fallacy of consequences, where someone will make a statement of fact, and the other person will say, "No, that's not true." Because if it were true, it would mean that XYZ, and XYZ is usually some morally distasteful or,↗

3:14:44@malleusigsomething they find to be unacceptable outcome. And the problem with arguments like that is that they are completely non-logical. They're, they're subjective. They have nothing to do with reality. You see this a lot with people like, "Well, You know, are the Somalis scamming the United States taxpayer out of billions of dollars? And you will see white women be like, "No, they're not scamming," and it's like, "Why?" Well, if you were-- if they were scamming, it would mean that you were targeting them on basis of race, and like they are-- I would have to acknowledge the fact that they are working together as an ethnic group to defraud the taxpayer, and I'm not ready to believe that, so it can't be true. And this is the-- this is the reason why when you You have to do everything you can to divorce emotionality from the discussion. You have to focus on the bare bedrock of objective reality, and as long as you can do so, you know at least you have something in common. If you are going to base your arguments on emotionality, everyone's emotions are gonna be different. You have no common ground on which to arrive at anything resembling a conclusion, and so you're just gonna be fighting. You're gonna be fisticuffs. That's it. Right? Basing our arguments on- Reality, an objective reality, is the only way we stay civil with each other, and the only way that we keep from getting into fistic, in fistic fights. And that's why I, Rabbi,↗

3:16:08Ian MalcolmI gotta ask, do you think because this feels very familiar, and look, there are individuals like Mitch F. who, despite his unwillingness to sometimes address issues like Karl Marx being a Jew, he will at least seemingly be capable of defining the words that you're trying to use Use, until perhaps it's something like Marx, which he wants to deflect from his Jewish ancestry. Yeah, right. do you think with other individuals, is what Alfie is doing here, is it a microcosm for the larger, group? is that a bigoted conclusion to arrive at, or is that perhaps, something that, that might result from genetics or- It's↗

3:16:47@malleusigendemic. So, if something is endemic, it doesn't mean that everyone in the group does it, but it's something that you mostly find in that group, right? So things like sick Non-blacks that it will have sickle cell anemia, but for the most part, it happens only inside that group, and that's why we call it an endemic issue. This form of argumentation is endemic to the Jewish diaspora, specifically the Ashkenazi Jews. And, I don't know much about the Mizrahi or the Sephardim, you might have it as well, because again, it seems to come from this Talmudic study, right? This kind of pilpul tradition. So it might be others too, but this isn't something that I have encountered↗

3:17:28Ian MalcolmOutside↗

3:17:29@malleusigof↗

3:17:29Ian Malcolmthe↗

3:17:29@malleusigJewish↗

3:17:29Ian Malcolmcommunity. but, but you would attribute it to, to culture and religion, not to some kind of genetic-- No, I↗

3:17:36@malleusigwould say there's, there's a-- I would say that there are a lot of factors at play, and I don't discount the possibility the genetic factors are in play. The paranoia that you see, which leads to a lot of the faulty conclusions and the loose decision making that they engage in, could very easily have its roots in the, two thousand years of casual inbreeding that's gone on, which we know raises-- incidences of things like schizophrenia, paranoia, hypochondria, all of these personality disorders are amplified when it come-- when you add consanguineous marriages into the mix. So there is no reason to believe that, you know, genetics aren't a part of it. We haven't isolated the gene for paranoia, for example, yet, so we can't really nail it down. We haven't isolated the gene for, you know, guilting your children. We haven't isolated like the Jewish mother gene yet, right? But that- That doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. But if you look at the patterns, I mean, y-y-the patterns are pretty fucking clear. this does seem to be an endemic issue.↗

3:18:39Speaker 8Can I add something about- Hang on, real quick. Hang on real quick. Al, hang on, Luky. Al, what are you? You are- You're Polish? You're Belarus? You're Ukrainian? What are you?↗

3:18:52@downfalconNo, I'm an American.↗

3:18:53Speaker 8No, what is your bloodline? What is your dad or your dad's dad? Where are they from?↗

3:18:59@downfalconto be honest, I don't↗

3:19:02Speaker 8know. I was adopted. Oh, shit. Well, alright. Anyways, so you're sure↗

3:19:04@downfalconyou're from Palestine, right?↗

3:19:05Speaker 8So, so that's the thing, though, right? With what Rabbi just said, it's like most of these guys, like- We can't really talk about the ins-↗

3:19:13Ian MalcolmAlfie, if you were, if you were adopted, your Judaism is based on what?↗

3:19:17Speaker 8Pretty much.↗

3:19:18Ian Malcolmguys,↗

3:19:19@downfalconJews typically adopt from other Jews.↗

3:19:21Ian MalcolmGood point.↗

3:19:23@downfalconHang on, it's not based on anything. I'm, I'm not Jewish. Oh, you're↗

3:19:26Ian Malcolmnot Jewish. Okay, so you're, you're just arguing, you're arguing and you're playing pimple and you're behaving in a way that Rabbi might suggest isn't Jewish. The↗

3:19:33Speaker 8thing↗

3:19:38Ian Malcolmis what I was trying to say just now. Hang on, hang on, hang on, L, hang on. You're not, you're not↗

3:19:44Speaker 8doing any- Wait, no, no, no, pause, pause, pause. You're not doing anything is the suggestion. What are you doing right now So I'm just saying. So that's all. I never said I was doing it. Well, I mean, that's what I mean, I'm, what are you?↗

3:19:59Speaker 16Are you Apple one, bro? I'm gonna be honest, I would like more. Are you a↗

3:20:03Speaker 15Shabu Shkoy?↗

3:20:04Speaker 16Wait, hold on, Alfie, are you Christian?↗

3:20:08@downfalconNo.↗

3:20:08Speaker 16Do you adhere to any religion?↗

3:20:10@downfalconWell, I'm kinda, I've been kinda doing, Seventh Day Adventist. I don't↗

3:20:16Speaker 16know. Okay.↗

3:20:17Speaker 14Wait, wait, hold on, hold on. You say you've been kinda doing that? Okay. My girl's trying to↗

3:20:21@downfalconget me into it. Wait,↗

3:20:22Speaker 14hold on. Are- You↗

3:20:25Speaker 15have a girlfriend? What else? You got into, into homosexuality as well?↗

3:20:29Speaker 14Okay, wait a second now. Hold on. You can't really kinda do that, right? You have to accept that Jesus Christ is the truth, the light, and the way. Is that, is that your I mean, you can't really dabble at it, right? It's not a superstition, right? It's not a talisman.↗

3:20:45@downfalconI'm just recently studying the religion.↗

3:20:47Speaker 14Okay, well, I've read them all, alright, but that doesn't, you know, I've read the Koran, it doesn't make me a Muslim. I'm asking you You say I'm, you're not a Seventh Day Adventist unless you believe in Christ. Do you-- Is this something you believe? I mean, I'm not asking you if you're reading literature, I'm asking you what you believe.↗

3:21:06@downfalconNo, no, I'll answer you clearly. I'm not a Seventh Day Adventist. Sure.↗

3:21:09Speaker 14Okay. Do you adhere to- I'm looking at it, but I'm not a Christian.↗

3:21:12@downfalconI haven't been baptized. Okay. So,↗

3:21:15Speaker 14so what is your ethnicity? My ethnicity.↗

3:21:21Speaker 14Yeah, why, why are you repeating my words back to me? I, I already heard me, I recognize the sound of my voice.↗

3:21:27Ian MalcolmReminds me of the beauty pageant where they, repeat the question back so you have a couple more seconds to think about an answer. I know I'm talking,↗

3:21:33Speaker 14I recognize the sound of my voice. So what, what is your ethnicity?↗

3:21:37@malleusigLet me explain Alfie really quickly. The reason we're asking is because your answer could either, prove an exception to what I was discussing or prove me fantastically right. Because if it turns out that you In a Jewish family, but you have Ashkenazi genetics, then that would be very interesting.↗

3:21:59@downfalconI took one of those ancestry tests one time, and it turns out I'm from, I guess, Poland. No, no, like, like Italy. Okay. Oh, the top. So I'm gonna ask↗

3:22:11Speaker 14you, hold on, I'm gonna ask you, I'm gonna ask you again, what is your ethnicity?↗

3:22:18Ian MalcolmHe has his 23andMe. How many did you get? Just let me, let me, let me↗

3:22:22Speaker 14just give me, just, just give me a moment here. I don't know. I don't know. You said you don't know your ethnicity? No. Okay. So I, I just want you to, okay, yeah, that's right. I just want you to know that, and for everybody else in the room, this is why I say don't be clever. It's so obvious, everybody else is gonna figure you out. There's nothing, a child could do this with their own bile, scribbling it on the wall. There's nothing profound or deep or, so when, when you ask someone in your own personal life what's their ethnicity, they always know. I've never had anyone not know. I've never had anybody go↗

3:23:01Speaker 14At least say they're part something, but they're like, "I'm Italian, and then my mother's this." I mean, for the, for the most part, every single person on the planet. When you have someone that says, "I don't know, I'm just a mystery unto myself." I don't know, I don't know what my religion is, I don't know what my ethnicity is. Well, I just landed on the planet, and I've been handed the instruction manual for my brain, and I'm just still thumbing through it. I'm sorry, but no one↗

3:23:31Speaker 8Test once. I don't know. It's like, bro, what are you talking about? You did a DNA test. The DNA test came back, it told you what you are. So what did it say on there? 'Cause that's all you need to do. Once. Okay,↗

3:23:47@downfalconI, I, I said it.↗

3:23:49Speaker 8Italian and what else?↗

3:23:52@downfalconI don't know, I don't have it in front of me right now. I don't, I don't remember. Oh my god, like, like, oh my god,↗

3:23:57Speaker 8like, listen real quick, like, I can't even stand this kind of shit. You telling me, and you're an adult, obviously you're an adult, right? I mean, you don't act like one right now, Al. it's like, you have a DNA test done, and now you're in a room of people asking, "What are you, what ethnicity are you?" Well, I It's like, are you, are you serious? It's like you don't know that your car is parked in the garage. Do you have memory loss? Are, are you, how old are you? I mean, I don't know what's going on here.↗

3:24:27Speaker 14Now you know why we don't want them running the media. Well, y- I↗

3:24:34@downfalconmean, I'm white.↗

3:24:41Speaker 8Okay, well, I don't know. Clearly. Al, al, al for real right now. Italian and what else? Make it pay. Do you↗

3:24:47@downfalconwanna, wanna, do you wanna wait and I'll pull it up and read it to↗

3:24:55Speaker 14you? Who gets a DNA test and then doesn't know? No, no, no, no, no.↗

3:24:58@malleusigThis↗

3:24:58@downfalconis, this is like, this is↗

3:25:00@malleusiglike when people say, "This is like when people say, "like, 'cause you don't wanna let trans women into a, into a ladies' room. My five-year-old kid wouldn't know that. If you actually wanna check their, their↗

3:25:13Speaker 14Rabbi, when I was gone, this wasn't broken. Now I came back home and it was broken. Now how did this happen? That's right.↗

3:25:21Speaker 13It'll be less embarrassing for you if you just get it out now. Strip off the bandaid, man. Just rip it off. Oh↗

3:25:27Speaker 8boy. Oh boy. Anyways, Alfie, why did you call yourself Alfie anyways?↗

3:25:33Speaker 8I mean, just that name on its own is already, it's just tripping me out. What's the, what's the, what's the, what's the thought process behind all of this? I'm↗

3:25:41Ian Malcolmgoing to guess the answer is I don't know.↗

3:25:43Speaker 8Right.↗

3:25:45@downfalconI like, I like the, guy from,↗

3:25:49@downfalconwhat's the show?↗

3:25:52Speaker 8he doesn't remember.↗

3:25:53@downfalconHe doesn't remember. No, Alfred Solomon's, Peaky Blinders.↗

3:25:58@malleusigOh, nice, nice. It's a good show. I↗

3:26:00@downfalconlike, I like that, I like that character. I think it's fun. I think he's-↗

3:26:03Speaker 8There you go. So you, you remember that, you remember why you to-chose the name on X, on some social media platform, but something so important as your DNA and your heritage and who you really are as an ethnicity, you can't remember that. I told you, I was able to↗

3:26:16Speaker 7answer that really quickly, just being like, "Well, how do you define favorite show or some shit?" I told↗

3:26:22@downfalconyou what it was like Italian or something. It was↗

3:26:27Speaker 8like European, and there's not just Italian, bro. I don't, if you pure Italian, then that's good for you, but I don't think so.↗

3:26:35@malleusigYeah. Can I, can I share, can I share an illustrative anecdote really quick, 'cause it sounds like we're not gonna get anywhere on this. Yeah, we're not↗

3:26:42Speaker 8going anywhere. Let's just, I think we should↗

3:26:44@downfalconactually,↗

3:26:51Ian MalcolmI think we're wasting time now. What do you think? You're asking me this, this ethnicity question, and, and I think you're- Wait, Al, Al, Al, Al, Al, I'm gonna meet you for a second. I'm gonna ask you a yes or no question, Alvie↗

3:27:07@downfalconYeah.↗

3:27:10Ian MalcolmCan you elaborate?↗

3:27:13@downfalconI think you guys are living or are in a bubble and you don't get very many people to challenge your views.↗

3:27:20Ian MalcolmDo you think you've challenged our views?↗

3:27:23@downfalconI don't think I really got a chance to because I got-- Okay, so↗

3:27:25Ian MalcolmAlfie, you struggled to define and then misdefined the word overrepresentation when we asked you a pretty basic question.↗

3:27:32@downfalconNo. Please explain to me how we↗

3:27:34Ian Malcolmdemonstrate or you demonstrated that we are incorrect in our worldviews.↗

3:27:38@downfalconYou didn't even agree with the definition that I was given by one of the- Yes,↗

3:27:41Ian Malcolmbecause Alfie, you don't get to use a word overrepresentation, which I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to type in, "Give me- The definition of what word do you think I'm gonna type in here, Alfie? Is it of over representation? Alright, now what do you think the answer of Grok is going to be? Let me, let me just get it for you. Okay, the idea of overrepresentation is where something happens more than I feel like it should because it makes me happy. No, I'm kidding, that's not the definition. Overrepresentation is the condition where a group, category, or type appears in much higher proportion than would be expected based on its share of the overall population.↗

3:28:29Ian MalcolmThat is the definition of that word. Now, you don't get to say how the representation makes you feel. When it says expected, it's not expected in terms of some loose, nebulous emotion or feeling. It is expected relative to proportion of the population. It's an easier,↗

3:28:49Speaker 17so if most↗

3:28:50Ian Malcolmindividuals that go to the hospital for attacks from canines are a result of pit bulls That is an overrepresentation of attacks based on the proportionality of those hospitalizations relative to pit bulls in the general populace of canines. That is a mathematical understanding of a concept. Now, you don't get to describe that concept based on how it makes you feel. What is nine divided by three? I feel like it should be yellow. That's not how this works. You don't get to define things and concepts in these rather effeminate, childish fashions.↗

3:29:32Speaker 6That's what↗

3:29:32Ian MalcolmRabbi was defining. I would presume that after Rabbi went through his description of what you have been doing, that you might take a little bit of shame, maybe a little bit of humility, and that you would adjust course. Instead, it seems like you're just gonna be independent or indifferent to it. She was like, "Nope, I'm just gonna continue on course. So I'm gonna ask you again, Alfie, please- Explain how you have denied or rejected or disproven any of the worldviews of the people in this room and have not actually magnified perhaps our confidence in the way that we understand the world based on your conduct here.↗

3:30:06@downfalconWell, I wasn't allowed to do anything. I wasn't allowed to say- Stop playing victim and give an explanation. If you would let me, if you would have let me come up here and talk about- Stop playing victim and answer↗

3:30:23Ian Malcolmthe question.↗

3:30:26@downfalconI, I already gave you the answer to that question. It's un- It's not my fault that you're not getting it. Ian, why don't we put it in more relevant↗

3:30:36Speaker 13terms for him? There is no amount of terms. Now,↗

3:30:38Ian Malcolmhere's the thing, here's the thing. This is-- we have now reached the point where I'm saying goodbye. You are gone. I'm not going to be bringing you back up. You are welcome to cry and scream and put whatever you want in the pill. Oh, you're intimidated by my knowledge? Now let me tell you all about history. It started off because I created the universe. And if you disagree with that, well, then it hurts my feelings, so you have↗

3:31:04Ian MalcolmThen you are wrong, 'cause I am Ali! It's, it's wild, man. You didn't disprove anything. All you probably did is you just reaffirmed Rabbi's position on the world, world in terms of how Jews behave.↗

3:31:16@malleusigIan, Elena, just in the comments, she went through his old posts, and it turns out he is Jewish. He has a post where he replies to someone, and he's posting↗

3:31:25Speaker 8Heather's stuff about Palestine, not his stuff. He replies to Heather and says,↗

3:31:29@malleusig"Defcon Mag seems to think that my supposedly being Jewish in and of itself shapes my opinion Regarding his dog events, it's convenient to dismiss any evidence I might present in support of my argument out of hand.↗

3:31:40@joann_marieWhy do they lie so much?↗

3:31:43@malleusigI mean, he said supposedly being Jewish, so maybe that's it. Maybe↗

3:31:46Ian Malcolmthat- I, I was gonna say, I was gonna call out supposedly, but the thing, it, it almost doesn't matter because the, the wild piece is that individual, about as effectively as anybody, even the smartest high IQ of the Jews that we've debated these topics with, basically landed on the same exact position. Which is that overrepresentation is just, that, that is a nebulous concept. Which in fact used to argue that the Jews weren't overrepresented because they had, in his words, the CV. What was he trying to express is that they're not overrepresented because if you actually look at the, the qualified candidates that can hold those positions, well, then they're largely Jews. That is still an overrepresentation. He is just redefining↗

3:32:30@malleusigthe word. Oh shit. And we see this over and over again. And his, he said his mother came from a Jewish family. He said his mother was Jewish, but I wasn't fully raised as a Jew or any religion in particular.↗

3:32:44Ian MalcolmOh, hey, hey, Rabbi, do you wanna talk about genetics again?↗

3:32:47@malleusigReally quick, can you↗

3:32:48Ian Malcolmlook up Al- Alfred Solomon?↗

3:32:53@malleusigThis is↗

3:32:53Speaker 7not- That's the first thing I thought when I heard Salomon's. I'm like, "That sounds like a Jewish last name." Then I looked it up, and yeah, he's a Jewish gangster in the show.↗

3:33:00Speaker 13Real quick, did you guys hear what he said? He, he said, "We live in a bubble and no one challenges our views." Yeah, I mean, except the entirety of the society we live in and every single institution therein. I mean, yeah, no one challenges our views at all.↗

3:33:14@malleusigNo, no, seriously, growing up being Jewish in America is like living on easy mode. Like everyone, everyone has sympathy for you, everyone believes, everyone gives you the benefit of the doubt by automatically, you have countless organizations and NGOs that are devoted towards advancing your race or your ethnicity, right? And it's like There's nothing, there's nothing easier than being Jewish in America, literally.↗

3:33:37Ian MalcolmBut Rabbi, Rabbi, even, we-- I, I began prior to him even opening his microphone, I said, "Because I believe in free speech for everybody." We literally brought him up. We brought up Yitz and, like, between the two of them, they've dominated the entirety of the space. I know, I know. And yet, you don't let us↗

3:33:54@malleusigchallenge your views. It's so bizarre, man. So what happens is, with, with, when you bring them up, they inter- interrupting has become such an integral part of their argumentation, argumentative style that we have gotten used to it and we've begun to interrupt them back, right? And that's why, like, we have the pig piles where five people↗

3:34:14@malleusigare The problem is, he's just getting back what he's put out there, right? It's this guy, Mitch, when they experience this, they're just getting back what people have figured out they're going to do if you let them do it anyway. And that's why, that's why I, I, I always try and give them lots of room to hang themselves, but I don't blame anyone for jumping in and interrupting them either. Because it's the only way, the only way you can fight them. Because if you just let them talk, they will eat up all of the air, and then when they're finished talking, they'll say, "I'm done talking now, I have to go, bye." And they won't not be able to go back. Well, I agree with that.↗

3:34:57Speaker 14I agree with the filibuster thing, but- Right. All I want, all I expect, is for them, 'cause the other thing is, and I call it the monkey dance, the monkey dance is where they keep changing the subject. So that is, yeah, because obviously, if truth is your enemy, then following one linear path of thinking, this is why I use the whiteboard analogy. I actually have a very large whiteboard in my house to work out philosophical problems, because I'll have the main question at, at the top, and then I'll think about what subsequent and subordinate convictions The follow on everything else, they don't like this. So what I expect from them, I do have a tendency to let 'em talk though. What I expect from them, what I expect from everybody, is to follow one line of reasoning down, down, down. So the answer, how do they do this? How do they avoid doing this? By moving around, just like you said, by filibustering, just like you said, and then the last one is by getting really excitable and turning it somehow into an ad hominem. People even do this to diligent. Where are we going with this question? What's implied in this question? Oh, yeah. Forget that, forget that. Because just give me your honest answer. Tell me, let's, let's arrive at, let's, let's stick a pin in some piece of knowledge that you assert, and then we can evolve from there. Now, the thesis and antithesis and synthesis, of course, this means we're getting to deeper and deeper levels of knowledge. They don't want this is why they play all those other games.↗

3:36:29@malleusigAnd that's the thing is, they always have to, they always have, if, if you agree with them, they're happy to engage with you. If you disagree with them anything, they always have to turn the conversation into, "Well, you're asking me this because dot dot dot, you hate me, you hate all Jews, you want us dead, you wanna destroy the land of Israel 'cause you're afraid of it, yadda yadda." And so by turning it into an ad hom, like you said, they can basically avoid any discussion of the facts. It all comes down to your motivations for wanting to discuss the facts, and that's why they love to be like, "Oh, wait, you people are so obsessed with us. Why are you so obsessed with us? Why do you wanna talk about Israel right now? Look at, as if there were no other genocides happening in the world, why do you wanna talk about this one?" It's like, "Well, sweetie, this is the one we're paying for, alright? That's why we wanna talk about it." And Rabbi,↗

3:37:24Ian Malcolmfor what it's worth, somebody in the purple pill↗

3:37:28Ian MalcolmDon't you let anybody who disagrees with you join, is the comment. Yeah. Now the irony is this goes back to overrepresentation, because we've been allowing between those last two speakers with the Alfie fool and the Yitz clown, that's probably been at least half of the space at this point. Oh, my God. Now given Jews are two percent of the population, that would be a drastic overrepresentation, perhaps twenty-five X.↗

3:37:52@malleusigRight.↗

3:37:52Ian MalcolmHalf of the space has been dedicated to people that don't agree with our worldview, but I'm gonna presume that's Super Bob, he's gonna define overrepresentation the same way that Alfie did. I don't feel like there's enough, there's not enough of us on said space. But just wild, it's as if you keep demonstrating the very tropes that we might suggest.↗

3:38:13@malleusigAnd the reason that happens is it's back to the whole obsession thing, right? So the reason why we end up talking about this and we don't talk about the genocide in Ghana or Uganda or Syria, right, is because we don't have like If we're gonna have one space on a genocide in Syria, we don't have three Syrians coming in and arguing with us that it's not really a genocide, or that it's okay, or that the people are killing every asshole and they hate gay people, so it's all right to kill them. We don't have that. We do have it when we discuss the Gaza genocide. When we discuss the-- when we discuss the Gaza Holocaust, we have Jews coming in trying to convince us that genocide is a good thing as long as it's Jews holding the gun. And that's why it becomes a larger conversation, and it snowballs, and then they gaslight you, "Oh, you're just obsessed with us." It's like, "No, we're not obsessed with you." It's like, "You keep coming in and trying to justify an obvious moral atrocity." We are going to want to argue against that.↗

3:39:25Speaker 7Really quickly, there's supposedly some reports of an explosion in Tehran. Trying to look into it, multiple sources here, but, I don't know, it could be fake, we'll see.↗

3:39:35Speaker 14But to sum up Alfie's point of view, we don't care about truth, we actually won't say anything to avoid the truth. We will redefine every word, but no, it's not a problem when we control the media.↗

3:39:51Ian MalcolmSo well put. Yeah. And, and just out of curiosity, so somebody suggested they put it up into the, the space, I don't know, somebody put up the comment, they said, "Alfie appears literally brain dead." which that is a rough comment, but I just wanted to suggest, the only reason that comment was made is because perhaps we're giving lots of other people plenty of airtime. but Rafa, you're saying that you found a post where he said, in fact, that his mother was Jewish, is that right? Is that↗

3:40:18@malleusighis mother Mother comes from a Jewish family but didn't practice.↗

3:40:23Ian MalcolmOkay, so he's got Jewish heritage, he's posted about such, but when asked about his heritage, he said that he was Italian and stuff. That's why I asked why. And he named his↗

3:40:31Speaker 7username after a Jew, a fictional Jew. Oh, no, it turned out to be a real Jew. Yeah.↗

3:40:35Speaker 14Yeah. But that's why I asked why. But to be fair, if his mother didn't practice, it's probably because she was a natural.↗

3:40:42@malleusigYeah, but yeah, exactly. But like, this is, this is why I App where I've said something with people that have were friends before, and then they suddenly turn on me and they go behind my back and start defaming me to like people that we both know as, as shared acquaintances, right? And I won't say who they are, but in both cases, I later found out, even though they didn't talk about it, even though one of them denied that he was Jewish, he had Jewish ancestry, he was like half Jewish, and it's like, that's why I cannot discount The genetic angle to this, it's very possible there is a gene or a set of genes that predisposes you towards not wanting to take on topics, straight on, but instead prompts you to, like, attack the person talking about it by destroying their reputation. Like, I'm not, like, it, it wouldn't surprise me if there was actually a gene for that. Obviously, we haven't found it, but this is the pattern that I'm seeing.↗

3:41:47Speaker 13Yeah, I'm a proponent of genetic arguments. All right, listen,↗

3:41:50Speaker 8this is, listen, let, let's go to some hands, man. We got people like Elena waiting for two hours, to even just say anything, for real. And I wanna say hi to Jake, Jake TV, what's going on, brother? It's good to see you down there. and yeah, I mean, let's go to some hands, Ian. What do you think? I mean, if you can talk about↗

3:42:10Ian Malcolmthe psychology- Yeah, no, absolutely. And we And we'll certainly, no offense to anybody, but we'll keep up some of our long-time, advocates there. I lost, almost lost the, microphone. And, and then we'll cycle through to make sure that everybody gets a chance to speak.↗

3:42:30Speaker 11Thank you guys. Can I go? Okay. Well, first of all, how's everybody doing? Hello. Thank you for having the space. Hi, Wolf. How have you been? It's been a while. Yeah,↗

3:42:43Speaker 8thanks for asking. Good. I'm doing good too. Thanks.↗

3:42:45Speaker 11Thank you. so this, I've been listening to this conversation with, with patience and, it's just, I want to remind everyone that they're following specific instructions. This is a pattern that they, they, they study, they learn. They have books on it, they ha-- I mean, you can buy a book on Amazon, on Househoushborough, and, I got my hands on↗

3:43:19Speaker 112002, Yaser Arfa, this, Hasbrouck, manual for students. I wanted to read a few things off of it for you guys. Hold on just a sec.↗

3:43:35Speaker 11So, there is a technique, or, or, not technique, but,↗

3:43:43Speaker 11it's called a-agenda setting and, Hold on, being proactive promoting Israel. Okay, people believe what they hear first. Uncritical audiences believe something if they hear it first and hear it often. People tend to believe the things they hear about a certain issue and filter subsequent information they hear based on their current beliefs. Once people believe something, it is hard to convince them that they were wrong in the first place. And the, in the communication styles, that's the word I was looking for. There's something they call point score. Point scoring is the correct method of communicating to use when the audience is likely to be only partially engaged. Talk radio, student newspapers, large panel discussions, and anything to do with television or the internet should probably be viewed as having partially engaged audiences, and as point scoring is the right way to communicate with the forum. Point scoring can irritate audiences who are genuinely committed to thinking seriously about the views on subject, and then they, literally give examples. To discuss score point in comments need to seem to be logical and to follow from what was said before. Use phrases that s-somewhat change the agenda or reframe the debate to do this. Well, that's not real, that's not really the right question. Or, I don't think we should be focusing on X, Y, Z. The real point is that X, Y, Z.↗

3:45:26Speaker 11That's an interesting point, but I don't think we can really begin to address it before we think about X, Y, Z. You seem to assume that, an assumption that's impossible to share. Really, we need to consider. I mean, I'm not gonna read the whole thing, but it's a whole manual. I'll post it on the purple pill. And also remember that,↗

3:45:51Speaker 11we are bombarded with the likes of, you know, Jorge, farm trolls, and, they've up, you know, up the a-anti. There are millions of them. The people on this platform, I feel, are just farm trolls and bots. It's just insane how the quality of this app has gone down the hill, and every time there is a, you know, escalation of a conflict or elections, they activate. So, i-i-it's important for us to remember that this This started with, you know, the whole director of NSA, Bill Binney, I think his name, was, and the whole Jake Sullivan, who created,↗

3:46:40Speaker 11the way to cheat ex-algorithms. he was, Roger Stone's, chief of social media strategy. So we have to remember that these large accounts are being promoted By a certain cheat algorithm, and we can't really spend our time. This is, this is the whole point, they're deflecting, they're, they're stealing our attention, so we won't be talking about the things we need to be discussing, so we won't be concentrating on the things that we need to concentrate. And a lot of this is wasting time. Just look at how much time you spent on these two people.↗

3:47:26Speaker 11It's pointless. You can't win. There is no way you're gonna change their mind. They're fucking with you, they're using these tactics, and they're wasting your time. And we're in good faith trying to change their mind, it's pointless. You're not gonna win the move. Or this↗

3:47:41Speaker 8whole thing you're saying right now, right? It's, it's, and I really like this, this psychology right here. It's the whole atmosphere of X, social media, social media influencers, the topics. Everything that's going on is literally been working perfectly into their hands. It's distracting from Epstein, from Palestine, from the genocide, from, from anything that's going on, from anything, any, anything that was, number one topic, everything that was talked about on a regular basis, it is distracted. And not only that, they're not only distracting, they've been subverting and they've been dividing. And they're doing a fantastic job, so it's a really-- I don't know what book that is, but continue, Elena, I think it's really important, 'cause I, in, in, in real quick, and not into any of the spaces, but I noticed X. And I talked to Ian about this back in JQ days, like where we're in this big stadium, we're getting put into a lobby, and then all of a sudden we have all of us that are thinking like in that lobby, and while everybody else is in different lobbies and in the stadium and different areas of the stadium, right? That's how I kinda see X. But not only that, I've been watching-- so I haven't been in space as much, here and there I go in the space, but lately I've been back 'cause I really enjoy it again with Ian, especially↗

3:48:58Speaker 8I'm not trying to talk about us in a bad way or I'm just pointing something out. What is X really, what, what are we, who are we really talking to and who's really actually listening when you're talking about the bot farms, when you're talking about all the bots? It's like I see the same people and, and that's just, this is my observation When I did, when I look from the eagle's nest, down and watch everything, it's the same people. It's always the same people, the same listeners, the same speakers, the same people, and there will always be this one or a couple other guys, a couple new guys. But, anyways, just my observation, just what I've been looking at, and, and I really do believe that X might be the biggest, psyop operation, a psychological operation, a-and not only that, using bots to make it look like we, in some, like even Million views, et cetera. Are those really views? is this really-- Are those really the people? Are those really real people? Is it just something just to keep you hooked? Anyways, those are all these thoughts I've been having. Anyways, Elena, continue. I like that. I like to open my mind again on that, 'cause I think about that a lot. I really do. Yes,↗

3:50:09Speaker 11you're absolutely correct. And, you know, there is a reason why Elon-- and this is why my account never goes anywhere, because I keep bringing this Clammed with the, the different labels and then, all my likes disappear. I don't care, you know? I'm not here to make money or, you know, do anything that will benefit me. J- But I'd like to bring your attention back to the fact that this platform was bought by Elon to, for election, so Trump can win, okay? The same thing with QAnon. There's a really good documentary on HBO. It's called Q into the storm. Oh my God. I mean, I thought things were bad, but things are bad, okay? The information war and all the psyops that they're pulling on people are outrageous. And every time we wanted to discuss, you know, there was a wave, right now we wanted to discuss tax strike, nobody's talking about tax strike. We keep Talking, trying to change the mind of Jews who are hiding and using these tactics, and we're just getting annoyed, we're getting nowhere. We have to start- I↗

3:51:24Speaker 14don't agree with that at all. We are winning. You know, Ian Malcolm uses, uses the, the idea of Jurassic Park that the, that life finds a way. Well, truth finds a way,↗

3:51:36Speaker 8and that is what--↗

3:51:38Speaker 14and that is, that is what's happening. The great awakening is happening. Well, David,↗

3:51:42Speaker 8hang on, let me finish what I said. And apathy is on↗

3:51:44Speaker 14the rise, so I, I don't-- Yes, go right ahead. Well, we↗

3:51:47Speaker 8can disagree↗

3:51:47Speaker 14when she's done. Two things can be said at the↗

3:51:49Speaker 11same time. I understand that we're-- This is important and spreading information is important, but sometimes we get sidelines and we forget to talk, to talk about which laws are being passed right now. What can we do in You know, area. W- how can we, like, I spend my time with people on the ground, and we actually do things that, like,↗

3:52:17Speaker 11prevent, prevent, Oh my God, I'm shooting blanks right now. The, the power stations for the, what's the word I'm looking for? The farms that they're building. Data centers,↗

3:52:30Speaker 8AI. Yeah, data centers. Yeah, yeah. Data centers, AI. So↗

3:52:33Speaker 11preventing data cen-- centers from being built or the solar farms being placed into, you know, natural habitat or-- Natural reservoirs,↗

3:52:42Speaker 8yeah. Yeah, yeah.↗

3:52:43Speaker 11Things like that. And, and we don't pay enough attention to things like that. Thirty-five thousand years called↗

3:52:49Speaker 8oak trees for solar panels and stuff.↗

3:52:51Speaker 11Exactly, and all of us can be more, more involved and discuss those issues that are relevant, that are necessary to pay attention while they're trying to distract us with pseudo events. there's this, this video, this, yeah, these pseudo events, they just bombard you with like information that doesn't really change anything, okay? But it, it steals your attention and it's a waste way of,↗

3:53:21Speaker 11prevent you from getting involved in things that you have power to change, okay? So it's important to distinguish between actual events, sh- and how much time we should pay attention to those, and pseudo-events, which is just psyops and brainwashing people into nothingness. highly recommend, by the way, to watch that documentary Q into the Storm on HBO. I, I learned, this is where I learned about, the X algorithm and- And who created the hack, on,↗

3:53:53Speaker 11promoting certain accounts and downgrading certain accounts. And, I'm gonna, I↗

3:53:58Speaker 8really need to bump in on this, just what you just said. Hang on, hang on, brother. Hang on, hang on, hang on. I, I do have, I have David waiting, so Eskena waiting, Spirit waiting. You can hold your doubt though, please. And then, thank you guys. Thank you guys.↗

3:54:14Speaker 11Thank you guys for giving me the mic. I appreciate it, and, yeah, have a good Good evening, and, I'll continue listening. Thank you.↗

3:54:25Speaker 8Ian, go ahead. Thank you so much for coming on. John, yeah. David, you wanna add to it? I know you had, you were, you wanted to say something. I wanna go, hear what, Sir Askin has to say. Yeah,↗

3:54:36Speaker 14I mean, I basically said what I wanted to say, which is that-- And I totally get what our friend here was saying about the distractions, totally get it. In fact, it's looking really sort of, you know, the, the way the Epstein thing, we've moved away from that, with the Charlie Kirk assassination, which I'll let everybody come to their own conclusions about that. However, the awakening, the big, the big headline is that the awakening is happening. When I came into the space, I heard people talking about the fact that they've moved from accusing you of antisemitism to Jew-hating. Well, why is that? Well, Raheem will tell you they kind of lost the plot on anti-calling people antisemites because they were exterminating a bunch of semites in Gaza. So all of a sudden, this word isn't working out very well. Well, what does that tell you? That tells you they're losing. These people require that the rhetorical game is, is lost for them, everything is gone for them. So it's very important to understand apostasy is on the rise, the truth is going to win out, we are winning out, and we just- Just have to keep going.↗

3:55:43Speaker 8Well, okay, on that point, though, David, right? And I, and I'm with you, and I love the optimism, but on that point, twelve thousand arrests for antisemitism online on, in England alone. Now we starting to see it in Florida, it's coming into Texas. California already has antisemitism laws in all schools. You can't talk about it, or it will hunt you and follow you for the rest of your life for anything you do, from any school you go to the next school, or from any job or any application↗

3:56:11Speaker 8If that's winning, then I don't know, like we aren't winning right now because right now they're implementing these r- these laws and these rules into our lives, and not only that, it's affecting our children And so that, that's a big fucking battle, that's a huge obstacle, and they're still winning because they're now talking about even the guys going to-- and look, I can't stand these guys going to that club, right? I don't care, these are degenerates, nobody needs to look up to them. It's absolutely pathetic, those, those fucking dudes, whatever they are, dude. going to this club, but what happened? You are banned from every club in the country because you're an antisemite, and you're not allowed to go any to, any to any restaurant in the country.↗

3:56:56Speaker 8Literally, Snico, in the country, whatever they own, they can't go anywhere, and it's specifically in Miami and in Florida, right? But how about,↗

3:57:05Speaker 15how about this though, Wolf, why not, why not support that, that ban that they have, make it a full-on boycott as well, complement it, let the Jews run the country? But you see what I'm saying, Truof, right? You see what I'm saying?↗

3:57:17Speaker 8How are we winning, like, you know, like right now, like honestly, like how are we, if they still get away with this, if they're actually getting away with this and actually h-holding human beings accountable and getting away with these laws and getting away with these punishments, then, man, that, it frustrates the shit out of me, and then we're not able to do it. That's just, look, I love, I love that the people are waking up But we're running out of time, and the pre- the pre-grams that they're, that they're throwing at us, like, "Here's this, here's that, here's your two thousand dollar check, we're taking this, we, we baste, we ice, we kicking out immigrants, we are doing this, blah, blah." All this shit that mega libertarians want to hear, all this shit that crepus want to hear, all this shit that Democrats want to hear, all this little shit that everyone is getting pieces off. Right? It's just, it's just, it's just not getting us anywhere. We just-- the country is in a, in a crazy turbulence, and I feel like that with all this distraction, with all this turbulence, with all this infighting, with all this subversion, with all this chaos, it's just not Uniting the people to stand behind one thing and hold these people accountable for coming off their first amendment and holding these fucking, you know, these laws that are being implemented and not constitutional. And they're already here. Vayma is already in America. It's already here. I live in California where it is already there. And not only that, we-- you know, we can talk about New York, you know a truth that I don't need to tell you nothing. You know what's going on here. You see it with your, with your own eyes, you know it. You know how slowly but surely they're fucking getting themselves in every way you look. You see it with your own eyes, I'm just saying. I love the optimism, but we have to be realistic as well and look at really what's going on right now in front of our door, outside of our door. When I walk outside my door, I, I don't see it yet, I don't.↗

3:59:07Speaker 14It's because you're in the Counter Reformation. We are definitely winning. And the Counter Reformation was because the Protestant, the people that were protest-protesting the Ecumenical power at the time, they were of course the demons of the world, had, having arisen from the bowels of hell. They were literally being excommunicated in the same way as they do today when they call you an antisemite. How'd that work out? Do we have Protestants today? We are going to win because they expend the currency of believability. See, that's what-- when the bullies come, when they have to send the bullies, well, right, but when they have to send the bullies, when they have to do this, it's like a civil rights thing, yes. Lots of people, lots of people go to jail, lots of people get in trouble, but at the end of the day, it's a pyrrhic victory for them. They're going to lose because every-↗

4:00:00Speaker 18is predicated upon the fairy dust, fairy dust of their legitimacy, of their credibility, and that is going down, down, down the tubes. They're going to lose, and the long stretch of time, the truth is gonna win.↗

4:00:15Speaker 19I mean, I, I, I'm, I love you, brother. I, I'm, I guess what- You know what? And we gotta pray for that. And we gotta manifest that, and we gotta keep hope every day, all day, and we gotta keep doing what Ian and Truth Tell has been doing on a daily basis. We gotta just keep it up, every one of us. It's a, it's a, it's a huge machine that has to, you know, we're all parts of this big-ass fucking machine. We all playing one part and one role in it. So yeah, I'm with you, David. Sorry, I just wanted to say that. I just, it's just, it's, it's, it's, it My God, they have been getting way too... They go, we go, we go on five steps, six steps, seven steps ahead, and then they come out, and then we go back eight steps, right? And it's like, "Alright, motherfuckers, alright, we gonna go back, and we gonna do it again, and then we go back forward, and then they come and do something again, and then we..." It's just constantly with these fucking people. Anyways, so Askin, I would love to hear what you have to say as well from that, And then I don't know Joanne knows the order and, and, and, and Truth teller, obviously I wanna hear what you have to say and Ian and all you guys, because this is a good topic right here.↗

4:01:28Speaker 19I can't hear you so- Is↗

4:01:29Speaker 20it working? Okay, I'm gonna recycle him.↗

4:01:33Speaker 19Copy. Truth, you wanna add something though?↗

4:01:40Speaker 20Yeah, sorry, it's in a back channel. So, you know, okay, go ahead, sir, I can wait.↗

4:01:46Speaker 21Oh, sorry, man, yep. And Wolf, I said, don't worry, man, I'm gonna make you sound wiped out after I talk, you're good. So, how to break it in a way that's not gonna fucking shatter everybody's soul. look, there's, you know, there's certain red flags that I, everything's psychological, right? And I have certain red flags, and I always try to look out for certain things, and I know that the enemy,↗

4:02:10Speaker 21one Is to align our goals with theirs, whether that's through prophecy, through uprising, through grassroots movements, they try to attach what they want as the goal through an organic, authentic, seemingly humane uprising, right? They wanna control that narrative. And yes, we're waking up, okay, sure, but maybe they also want us to wake up. And maybe they wanna hijack that. The whole concept of the Great Awakening, for example, is a Luciferian occult mystery school ideology. It's a Blavatsky theosophic doctrine. All of these parasites that are controlling us have been awaiting the Aquarian New Age Great Awakening for millennia.↗

4:03:02Speaker 21So I have to question myself when my, you know, if I was in two right now and I'm kinda wake people up Into the mysteries of, you know, the, the trauma, the adrenal gland. What am I doing? I'm, I'm doing exactly what Belovatsky wanted everybody to do, which is called externalizing the hierarchy. I'm explaining to people what's going on, but in a way that they are themselves introduced into the philosophies that they want to govern the world, which are anti-Christian, for one. So you have to consider this with everything that you're doing. Now, I'll try to make this relatively quick. How did they hijack Good things, like what, what are the some of the weapons they use? 'Cause these people are deceptive motherfuckers, right? What are the some of the, the, the tactics they use to↗

4:03:47Speaker 21plant seeds into our organic movements? censorship's a good one, right? People, censorship is a two-edged, two-edged sword. Most people know that censorship is obviously used, to, control dissent and to muzzle- You know, to muzzle voices. Obviously, that's the obvious, fucking, use of censorship. However, there's another use to censorship, which is to add credence and validation to falsities and lies. And if you don't think this is true, there's liv- we, we all in this room have living proof of that through Q.↗

4:04:23Speaker 21Q was highly censored, everybody got zapped. Yet today we all know that it's a fucking op, it's straight bullshit. They used censorship, they played Judas, they made their Judas goats act like us and, and they sent them to the slaughter like they sent us. And by this, by doing this, they, we, we added them into our- Camaraderie, and all of a sudden we're, we're infiltrated. They're doing this with everything, guys. Whether that's JQ,↗

4:04:54Speaker 21you know, any movement that you could think of, they're introducing their soldiers at the helm. And look, look at this way, right? When I turn on this app, what is it, four hundred million fucking people apparently on this thing? Why do I see the same fucking, I don't know, man, a thousand maybe fucking assholes? And it's what, misfit patriot and all these fucking dickheads that I, what the fuck? Why am I always seeing the same fucking assholes? And everybody could say the same thing, why am I seeing African or, or, you know, I say I'm sensitive, why am I seeing the same fucking assholes all the time? It's because they're compartmentalizing everything. Within groups, and they're showing you what, what triggers you to, to garner your engagement, to measure, manage, and monetize how you react to psyops. We're looking at magicians with black screens, never forget this, right? People have to remember everything you see on every fucking screen, you're seeing for a reason. Everything you're seeing is a lie. Everything is there to manipulate you.↗

4:05:49Speaker 21social media has way more fucking influence than Hollywood or television ever could. And we all know those industries are loaded to the gills with fucking satanist Jews scum. Online is no different. It's all ritualized, initiated scumbags that are at the helm of all the movements that we want, and they're gonna drive our vehicle to align with the goals of our parasitic controllers. And last thing I'll say, Nolan, free will is a big thing here, right? biblically speaking, if you wanna take that. You know, the Bible's either God's word or it's the playbook. Either way, you need to fucking-- you need to-- doesn't matter if you don't believe in God or, or the God of the Bible doesn't fucking matter. It's the playbook, you need to fucking act accordingly, or you're gonna get crushed. Having said that, within the Bible, the harlot, which is Jerusalem, which is Israel, which is the Jews, the reason why they are the harlot is because they are the only ones that, that broke a vow with God, which is a harlot. They broke their vow, their marriage with God. They are the harlot. They are to be destroyed by the Antichrist fi- phoenix that rises from their ashes. So the, what, you know, for, for Noah's laws to come into play, for their Messiah to come White Christian nationalism has to grow, it has to attack the JQ, it has to destroy it, they have to be destroyed, and we need to free will and build our freedom utopia, which is really the goals of our parasitic controllers to begin with. So there's like a three card monte of psyops going on, and we're all↗

4:07:21Speaker 21knowingly or unknowingly, most of us are lining up with our controllers' intentions, and you just have to be fucking Be mindful of that with everything that you see at all times. So, I hope that made sense.↗

4:07:32Speaker 19I, I love it. I, I love it. I, I'm sorry, but it sounds complicated to a lot of people and crazy, but that's how fucking weird and deep this rabbi hole is and the psychology behind it. These people are experts, at, at psychology. But, I don't know, I don't know if you understood here, you know, he's been running for him and maybe it's just kinda resting for a second, but truth Go ahead, bro. So Esquenazi, I, I, I love the way you think, bro. Yeah, I'm here, Wolf. I really do. I'm, I'm,↗

4:07:58Ian MalcolmI, I, I know you enjoy it, and I've, you've got this, but no, I, I, I think what, Esquenazi was just saying there, I mean, obviously not only is it correct, but it's incredibly important to keep in perspective, and I say that just because You know, it's one thing for us to be able to look at all these historical patterns, it's another to be able to recognize that part of the pattern is the continuous running of these psychological operations. And we can go back to Operation Trust and the Bolsheviks. I mean, this entire idea of, of mind games and, and kind of weaponizing pop culture against the masses, it's something that they've been doing for well over a century, and that's just the documented version. I'm sure Truth Teller can give you historical examples that maybe go back all the way to Rome, right↗

4:08:39Ian MalcolmWe do need to recognize these things and not allow essentially a, a metaphorical gates of Toledo to take place with your mind, where they're keeping you focused on some digital or intellectual fight elsewhere, so that you send all your brain power out there while you open the back door for them to propagandize you in different ways. And that's, that's why I brought up this idea, not necessarily attacking Tate or Fuentes or any of these folks, but just to note, right, that sometimes the most powerful subversion isn't the obvious enemy, it's the person that we believe is the- Friend. And if I look at what Andrew Tate pushes, it's really obvious that the entire red pill thing that he is out there monetizing is essentially materialism, vanity, hedonism, and all of those other things that we would loosely associate as being the goals of the JQ, right? It's just a different way to push you there. So instead of turning on the television and having your new favorite sitcom showcase the, the quote-unquote modern family, none of which are married, none of which are,↗

4:09:39Ian MalcolmLet's say traditional in any sense, right? If, if that's not gonna get you, then they'll get you to go to YouTube and turn on Andrew Tate and to listen to him and his worldview, which pushes at the end of the day, the exact same destruction of the nuclear family, it's just a different roundabout way of getting there.↗

4:09:54Speaker 19I, I love it. I love all the, I love the high IQ on this topic. So,↗

4:09:58Ian MalcolmWell, we're, we're trying to. And speaking of high IQ, I know that we've got Mr. Doc Holiday down there, haven't seen him around in quite some time. I got someone for you, ladies and gentlemen.↗

4:10:06Speaker 19I got someone for you, too. Doc↗

4:10:08Speaker 21Holiday, the Q guy? No way. Oh, okay, no, fuck. I got excited, motherfucker.↗

4:10:15Ian MalcolmNo, we got, we got Doc Holliday. We'd love to, to hear some thoughts from him. Wolf, I'm always open for anybody and everybody. and I will never forget the, the debates that I used to have with those Q folks, who at this point, I think have basically lost any and all credibility. It's pretty obvious that they were part of a ruse. and, and it's just, it's, it's the evolution of our conversation, right? We can't win, and, and maybe it's a bit of a tangent before↗

4:10:43Ian Malcolmwe Can't make any statement on it, but they are claiming that it's the back end labels that are placed onto my account. Again, I don't know if this is accurate or not. They're just sharing what they believe to be correct. And looking through it, the thing that is pretty wild about these supposed, labels is that it even goes in and walks through, not just how they are suppressing and censoring the content. but it notes specifically, it says that in spite of the censorship, we still host very popular spaces on X, and it suggests minimizing visibility of those spaces, which is so curious because, well, we knew that they were doing that for a while. We know that they were doing that to Truth or Space, and every space that I've opened for the last couple weeks, people report that they can't hear the audio. They go into all kinds of other rooms, they don't have any issue. They come in here, and every minute, two, three, five, whatever it is seems to cut out for lots of people. Now, the curious piece about it, for what it's worth, is that I don't see those comments made by people that I regularly engage with. It's not people that I follow, it's not people that I've, I've been talking about these subjects with at length. Right? It's not like Lou is coming in saying I can't hear anything, or perhaps Eschonar or David. It's often people that I've never seen their handles, and what does that make you suggest? Perhaps it's that what they're trying to do is to minimize the availability of an audience that is outside of the traditional one that we engage with, to give us, like you were saying, Wolf, the illusion that we're participating in the big stadium. But anybody just happens to walk into the room that we're pushed into the far recesses of that stadium in, oh, they walk by, they can't hear anything. Because in addition to locking the door, they put some soundproof padding on it, so nobody knows that we're here. They don't know that we exist, and even if they somehow stumble in, they can't hear anything that we say. So it gives us this false front, if you will, the make-believe system that we have free speech. We don't, obviously, and Eskenar can tell you all about why that is, but that is part of the subversion. So we need to note those things, and in, incumbent in that is the recognition that we also need to go into our local communities, we need to try and to go into other people's spaces. That's why you'll see me in all kinds of different conversations, whether it's Santino who's hosting one space, whether it's Tom, Godfrey, And regulars with, but I even used to back in the day go into the punch bowl space until they booted me and said, "Never come back, you antisemite." Right? We need to figure out how to find common ground, and so if it's something as trivial and trite as sports ball or some hobby or some passion, try to figure out how to get outside the walls of just these immediate groups, because while they are very, very helpful, it's very clear to me that they aren't going to let our audience as much as we might try, and, and we'll- Look, we're at five hundred right now, that's pretty good, right? But we're probably never gonna be able to get the mass visibility of some of these other handles. And for what it's worth, I don't know why anybody listens to Mario Niffler, I really don't. It's, you might as well just turn on CNN. Right? It's basically a, a, a low IQ rendition of that thrown in with a bunch of voices that are gonna shill the exact same nonsense just in a less professional manner, and you don't have some beautiful fox babe reading it off to you. By the way, most of the women aren't foxes, not, not so, not so attractive anyway. But,↗

4:14:12Ian Malcolmthat is the wild piece about this, right? Is they are trying all these different things, not just to censor and to, to suppress, but to give you the illusion that you have the fair fight so that they can Pretend that their success is a result of their cleverness or their intellect or any of this other nonsense. We are on an uphill battle. We're doing so with both hands tied behind our back. We're doing so with both of our legs, strapped together, right? We're doing the one-legged race up the hill. We're doing it in the middle of the night, and they're throwing snowballs out as, as we do, and they're sitting there and saying, "Haha, you're not as fast as we are." It doesn't matter if they're two feet tall, it doesn't matter if they have no athleticism, their legs aren't tied together, so it's a pretty easy fight. It almost feels like, to make a little reference, if anybody remembers the story of Gladiator, which, oh by the way, that's based on loosely, a somewhat true story, the mad, king, if you will, that was played by Joaquin Phoenix, that individual, true story, he actually had so much vanity that he would sincerely, just like in the movies, they would wound- Gladiators and then dress the wound and put on light armor so that he could go in and fight against them,↗

4:15:28Ian Malcolmand the crowd would know nothing of it, so that he could pretend that he was the big strong guy. Think about that for a second. Think about having so much power and so much might that you can do literally anything. You're one of the most powerful people in the world, and still your ego is so fragile. That you have to put on the ruse that you are macho. That's what we are against. A group of people that have every piece of the mechanisms of control. They have all the power, they have all the money, they've bought everybody and everything, but that's not enough. They also have to be glorified, as if they're intelligent, as if they're clever. But like David said earlier, you can't fake that. You can't fake intellect. So every one of them that comes into these rooms ends up getting laughably walked out of the conversation, and yet they take no shame in it. That is perhaps a microcosm for this entire thing. They want us to be slaves, they want us to thank them for having us as slaves, while being completely ignorant of that reality, while we are also simultaneously reveling At their false vanity, their false accolades, their false success. We, the smart, generous, genuine, caring, compassionate people, have to basically bow down to the psychopathic liars who really have no talent. They have no accolades, and for what it's worth, when it comes to the intellect, I'm starting to become convinced that this group of people is about as intelligent as they are athletic. So go and ask Google for a list of the most talented Jewish athletes. See what it gives you. That's basically my thoughts on how intelligent the group of people that I tend to debate these topics with actually are. They own all the teams. You're not gonna see them make a three-pointer, slam dunk a basketball. So that is what we were up against. A group of people that are in the owner's box, they want you to believe that they could slam dunk the ball from the free throw line like Michael Jordan. They just don't have to do it because, well, we already know they can. Or at least they'd have you believe such. That is the vanity, that is the insanity, and that's why they don't come down from the nosebleeds very often. To step onto the court with any of the people that are up here on this space and panel. So I apologize for the rant and the ramble, didn't mean for that to rhyme, but sometimes it'd just be like that, Mr. Stanson, I think, is the, cartoon. So Wolf and Joanne, back to you guys.↗

4:18:00Speaker 19I love you, dude. Go ahead, Joanne, let's go Doc Holliday, right? Doc, Doc is next.↗

4:18:06Ian MalcolmYes, and then, and then Tom.↗

4:18:10Speaker 22Thank you very much. Thank you, Ian. Always a pleasure to listen to you, Wolf, Joanne, and everyone in the space. first and foremost, just in a lighthearted comment, if anyone does come across Dustin Nemos on X spaces, tell him that I don't send my regards. I haven't seen him for a while, so he must be busy, you know, or he's just difficult to find, you know, as a gay person in a women, like, at a female strip club. Anyway, on a more serious name↗

4:18:39Speaker 21on my page, search his name on my page, you're welcome.↗

4:18:42Speaker 22Okay, will do, will do.↗

4:18:43@warsawerikAll good. He's busy getting jacked on trend and↗

4:18:46Speaker 23testosterone and↗

4:18:48Speaker 22other anabolics. No, no, all good, all good. In relation to the title of the space, Snake-o, the Tate brothers, to me, they're just like, you know, to keep it as short as possible, irrelevant, a distraction for the gullible gentiles to supposedly put their faith or belief in them, and ultimately, if you follow blind people People just leads you to nowhere 'cause they have no direction, no goal, et cetera, et cetera. But I just requested the microphone 'cause I wanted to ask David a question. David's a very deep thinker, philosophical, so I wanna get his point of view,↗

4:19:22Speaker 22specifically, let's just say in terms of the United States or the American people. And when I say the American people, I refer to the people who settled, founded, and built the nation that is the USA. First and foremost, the Western Europeans or the Anglo-Celtic, the Germans, and then over time, the migration through other, you know, from other parts of Europe, with a specific focus on those people, and I'm not being racist or derogatory to other people who live in the United States, but I just wanna see David's line of thinking. If I was to ask you now, those American people that live in the nation now↗

4:20:03Speaker 22Who does America serve? Who does America follow? And what are the dreams, wishes, and aspirations of those American people in 2026? What would your response be, David? And you can take the question any which way you want. I may have one or two follow-up questions. So ultimately, who do they serve? Who do they follow? Who is their ideal? Let's put it, you know, even more, even a simpler way. Who is their god?↗

4:20:33Speaker 22I hand the mic over to you.↗

4:20:35Speaker 18Well, I know who they serve. I don't want to hear Americans anymore say, "Hey, you work for us, man." Really? I don't think it works that way. Clearly, we are enslaved by our own political state, who in turn is run by Jewish supremacists. I mean- I think we should just say the thing, right? We should just say the way it is. If you wanna solve a problem, you need to identify it, and there it is, I identified it. Ian and I have talked about this before. If you-- and I'm talking to everybody in the room here-- are not willing to say the obvious thing If you're not willing to identify the problem in an obvious way, then it puts us one step further away from solving it. And I think that you'll feel bad in the future when we do solve it, because you'll realize that we wasted time when we could have done it more quickly. But then when you said "we," I assume you're still saying the people who identify with the, with America and its founding, in its foundation. Well, America is the country of the Enlightenment. It's a country predicated upon the idea that the quality of a civilization is, is based on what you can't vote on, not what you can vote on. And of course, we're migrating far away from that. We're migrating to this idea that the political state owns you in every way, that morality doesn't exist, that it's-- that the veracity of a given point, including an immoral position, is just dependent upon the number of people who subscribe to it, and therefore can be persuaded by our media. Well, I will say that the idea of that sacrosanct right of the individual, the idea of the sort of liberty idea of the founding of our country Country, I still think that that is in our hearts, even though it may not be on our tongues. I don't think they can put that enlightenment genie all the way back in the bottle. I don't think they're gonna turn it back to the dark ages, which is what they're going to have to do. You know, people when Israel says, "Oh, you know, we're, we're American, we're like America," no, they're not. They're absolutely, they operate and think just like people from the Middle Ages. There is no virtue, there is no goodness, might is right to them, by the way, that's a very anti-Enlightenment point of view. So I think in the long stretch of time, we win, but I don't, I do say We serve, in terms of who we're actually working for, we serve Jewish supremacists in the political state. It's just a matter of whether we're going to be emancipated, and I think the answer is yes, we're going to be emancipated. I think that a country that no longer wants to be ruled by these people can't be ruled by these people. So it's just a matter of whether we're going to honor this, this idea that Henry David Thoreau expressed, which is The world would be better off if we're all a little more stubborn. Well, this country was founded by people that were very stubborn, and they became seditious. You think it's bad to be called an antisemite now? You think it's bad to be accused of heretical thinking in terms of the power structure? Imagine what it was like for our forefathers who said, We all, we hang separately or we stay together, and that's it. That's the choice we have. This is a choice that we've had many, many times in the history of, of human civilization, and in the long stretch of time, I think that the truth is going to win out. I certainly think that's true of America. I just don't think that they're going-- I think they're going to go too far, and that's the reason why they got thrown out of a lot of other countries. And I really think that now is the great awakening. So, so yeah,↗

4:24:12Speaker 18You know, I'd have to admit, we serve people that we shouldn't be serving, but I don't think that's going to continue.↗

4:24:20Speaker 22Well, you know, thank you for your response. Out of your mouth into God's ears would be my response to that, the, you know, to the last sentence that you said there, David. But, you know, and I'll finish up like here with this point, and then, you know, whatever, if you wanna say something back, all good. If not, go to the hands, there's many of them. My, my basic position then, David, is even if it's towards the United States or you can apply to the Western world in general, those people that- You know, or that group, aka the Jews, that the Western peoples are subjected to or who they serve. The reason that Jewish supremacy hates those people is because those people are, are the very bedrock of what was historically Christendom, and they were the greatest force that stopped them continuously from enacting and establishing their satanic new world order. So, w- The way I see it, they hate the Europeans, or you wanna say the whites,↗

4:25:22Speaker 22because of their Christian ethos, their Christian morality, and their Christian history, and because they hate Christ, they want to-- or they seek the eradication of everything Christian. That's why when you look at gay marriage, LGBTQ, abortion, and every other single satanic degeneracy, who's behind it and who pushes it throughout the Western world? So then, you know, again, this isn't in my position, I would ask you, especially from an American point of view, be it whatever denomination, be it the Orthodox Christians, the Roman Catholics, the Protestants, et cetera, et cetera, why? Why are the-- why are those church leaders, not saying all of them, but the vast majority, they're so silent, they're so quiet on key issues, they're not really leading the flock, they're not speaking out openly against the degeneracy, they're not actively pointing out that that's the wrong choices by the politicians, they're not really testifying their Christian faith, they're more sort of hidden or, you know, they're trying to sit on two seats at a time. I mean, I would say it's a time for action, not a time to be quiet. So either the Christians of the world, especially throughout the West, it's time to take up your cross and to fight, not physically, but to fight mentally, spiritually against those forces that seek your very eradication and destruction, be it through abortion, mass immigration, mass eugenics, et cetera, et cetera. Do you, from your point of view, David, do you see the, you know, the church leaders, the church representatives, very weak in the Western world? Because if they're not, the synagogue wouldn't have been able to establish its unlimited power that it has right now through our two, two, you know? Throughout two thousand and twenty-six, and it seems to me that it'll continually, you know, be exponential growth for the Jewish power for at least the next five, ten years, and that's the scary part. Thank you very much for the mic, I'll return the mic, whoever's next. Thank you for your responses, David. Thank you, Ian Wolf. In regards--↗

4:27:42Speaker 18But, but, but no, I don't think. You know, reminds me of- Of, Bill Murray's line in Groundhog Day when, when, Andy McDowell is talking about the local people, he says they're Hicks, Rita. You know, I don't care what the church leaders have to say, and quite frankly, it's not about them. You know, what is the problem here? What is the-- The problem is you're talking about white Europeans that have this one unique quality. Their outgroup love, their outgroup care for other people exceeds any other people on earth, maybe with the exception of the Japanese. But they haven't proven it to the degree that we have. No other civilization has tried this melting pot idea. No other civilization has gone around the world and tried to make their water better and their plants better and their ecosystems better. No other people has so much outgroup love, and yet, and yet we have incorporated a small group of people within our civilization that have the most outgroup psychopathy. What do they think? What is their implicit goal in every civilization and in every- Every country with which, within which, they've gotten thrown out of, and that is to operate at the expense of that civilization in a parasitic way in order to strengthen themselves and weaken the group. The flea doesn't wish the death of the dog, it just wants more blood. And we just have to stop giving it. We just have to identify, you know, during the plague, we could never identify what is the problem, what is the systemic problem that is killing half of Europe? Well, now we have a systemic problem that's killing all of Europe, that's destroying our civilization, and we have to identify it. And by identifying it, we solve it. We don't want vengeance, we want emancipation. They know it, now it's time for we-- for us to know it. And I'm telling you, the reason why we're going to win is because once We have a critical mass, and that doesn't mean a majority. Critical mass is always five, ten, fifteen, twenty percent. That's enough, throughout history, that's proven to be enough. When that critical mass is achieved, then these people are done for.↗

4:29:51Ian MalcolmIt's worth noting two things. Number one, that is a metaphorical done for. We're talking about the power structure, not any people specifically. I just wanna call that out. and I know that, that David, that's a no-brainer, that's obviously implied, but wanna call it out because we obviously get attacked, for these spaces, so we have to be very, very particular with our words. I also wanna give a big, big, big thank you to, Jake TV, who just popped up. Always wonderful to see him on the panel. A ton↗

4:30:18Ian MalcolmBecause if you haven't seen his videos, I don't know where you've been. there's some of the best on X, harnessing the power of AI to try and combat, propaganda with essentially that, right? They, very, very clever takes on, the reality of the world around us. So big, big shout out, lots of love. I'll put one of them up into the purple pill, where I also put, oh, by the way, commentary on individuals struggling to listen to the space, which would again affirm the suggestions made about the Individual who sent me what they claim is the coding on the back end, and I also want to give a big shout out to the one Parsival, I'm going to put up into the nest right now. He just dropped this five hours ago. I've been looking forward to this, talking about the new X algorithm. we've done spaces in the past with Parsival about a, a year or two ago. He broke down exactly what was happening on the back end as he was able to understand it, and he is Is back again with a new thread analyzing every little bit and piece of the matrix that we find here on X. So, I did send him a note, I asked if he's free, if he can jump in with us, and if not, we'll try to do a space on that another time. he's absolutely a wonderful, wonderful resource for us for the tech front when it comes to understanding the software on the back end. now that being said I know that we've got Tom and the Orthonaut, and, and we're in that order, but I'm going to, I'm gonna kind of, what's the word, buck that for just a moment. The reason I'm going to do this, I don't like to give, let's say, attention to trolls.↗

4:31:57Ian Malcolmbut nine nine nine point nine, decided to put down into the purple pill It's so tiring. Am I afraid of debate? He said. I, I should put this up into the nest. Now, a few things. I wanna be very specific. Number one, I have no idea who you are. Zero. Zilch. So no, there's no fear. Number two, we've got five hundred people in here with, currently eight other individuals requesting mics. you aren't special, you aren't chosen. I don't know if you're Jewish, if you are, I don't care about that status either ethnically or religiously. You don't get prioritization over other people. That's how adults handle things. If you wanna be a child and suggest I'm afraid of that which I don't know, you aren't the dark, you aren't what's under the bed, you are a handle↗

4:32:45Ian MalcolmWhat lurks under the bed late at night that I can't see? you're not part of that thing. And so with that being said, I'm going to allow you to share your piece prior to going to Tom, and then we're gonna go to the Arthanot. So nine nine nine dot nine, you're welcome to share whatever you want. I probably have no interest in debating, but if you, would beg and plead, then perhaps I will, I will play along. But you're gonna have no more. The, let's see,↗

4:33:14Ian Malcolmyou were We are going to say goodbye at the end of that.↗

4:33:18Speaker 24You know, that's rich. considering you and I have traded so many messages, in DMs, that's, that's funny. And plus, we've been on Spaces so many times, and I have a lot of friends in here, so, so that's just interesting that you would say that. Anyway, I did change my, my moniker or avatar, if that's, if that's, if that's the reason, but I wanted to just draw attention to something here and call out. You↗

4:33:45Speaker 24We, you know, from someone that's done a lot of research, and I know you have, and you guys are very, you know, articulate on this subject, it's very interesting how we blame all the Jews when we know principalities can embed themselves into pretty much any system. Now, if the Jews weren't in charge, they would choose someone else. And, and principalities and demons are very good at this. They're very good at embedding themselves in anything, family, s-uh, systems of government, and this just-- this list goes on and on. Rothschilds Freemasonry, the whole thing. So what, so the point is, and, and this is, this comes from, scripture, is that I-- And I'm the number one sinner probably up here, 'cause I got started a long time ago, back in when AOL and, and YouTube was just getting started. And that's the reason my accounts are all banned and, and, and censored. But the reason is, is because judge not lest you be judged, right? You guys know all these. But there's a lot of them. Like, there's a considerable amount of↗

4:34:45Speaker 24Condemnation against collective judgment. And when you read scripture, which I haven't in the past, and so now since I'm, I'm really looking at, you know, this thing from a microscopic level, really diving into scripture and what it's really telling us, and, and what I'm sharing with you all, and this is more for the audience, Ian, is that Condemnation comes down for collective judgment, and why? Because the kingdom isn't gonna allow it. It's not gonna allow anyone that's, you know, kind of grouped into something and, and allow you to poison or us, I should say, 'cause I'm included, the well, right? We're not allowed to do that, and that's very-- And, and so I would just caution all of our, our Christian brothers and sisters in here, and I love you all very much, and this is, this isn't, this isn't, you know, a fight here,↗

4:35:33Speaker 24Ian. You know, since hundreds of thousands of Jews have taken Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, it's gonna be very dangerous for us to stand in front of our Creator and say, "You know, I meant that, but I didn't say that, but I meant it." You see what I'm saying? So I'm not really trying to come up here and start a big fight, Ian.↗

4:35:55Speaker 24what, what I'm trying to do is just bring light to what I'm finding. You know what I'm saying? So it's not, it's not to say that you're, And you, and if you, you knew me and how I spoke in your previous spaces, and for year-- like we've been at it for what, two years now? And I'm surprised you don't remember me, but I just changed my avatar. But the, the reason is, is, is to, is to make sure that my Christian, my Christian brothers and sisters don't fall into this trap. And it's a-- And the kingdom,↗

4:36:25Speaker 24the kingdom will not compromise. They're not, it's not gonna take↗

4:36:28Speaker 18hold on, hold on, hold on. Hold on. What's, what↗

4:36:33Speaker 24No, you're↗

4:36:33Speaker 18speak- you're using too many clichés. So let's be clear, I'm interested in what you have to say, so you should not fall into this trap.↗

4:36:39Speaker 24David, you're not- David, I'm not speaking to you, I'm speaking to Ian. It doesn't- Okay, well, you↗

4:36:42Speaker 18said you're speaking to all of us. So what's the "this"? I'm speaking to Ian. Hold on. You said "this trap."↗

4:36:50Speaker 24Ian,↗

4:36:51Ian Malcolmthat's okay, David. Hold on. I know↗

4:36:57Speaker 18you're gonna spur me now. I know we have that You said, "You said we can't fall into this trap, so what is the trap?"↗

4:37:08Speaker 24I laid it out very clearly, and I can say it to you again. So I'll, I'll give it to you again, Romans, here, two, one through eleven, and I can give them all to you. Therefore, you have no excuse, O man, every one of you who judges, for in passing judgment on another, you condemn yourself, because you, the judge, practice the very same things. Now, hold on, we'll go to verse two. Now, we- Hold on. Context is important. We know that the judgment rightly falls on those who practice such things, yeah? And it just keeps going. I can give you the whole verse of scripture. Okay, wait, wait, let's↗

4:37:41Speaker 18not keep going though, okay? Hold on. Hold on. Okay, let's get a↗

4:37:43Speaker 24capable one. That will illuminate, that will illuminate the whole verse of↗

4:37:45Speaker 18scripture. Yes. Hold on, my friend. Hold on, hold on. Okay, so is it, are you basically saying that we should not judge? Is that basically what you're saying?↗

4:37:58Speaker 24No,↗

4:38:01Speaker 24no, that Chapter two,↗

4:38:03Speaker 18section five of the Bible. Let's just, I'm, I'm only interested in what you have to say.↗

4:38:08Speaker 24Since you're not listening, I'll clarify it again.↗

4:38:09Speaker 18I am listening. I'll be glad to play back what↗

4:38:11Speaker 24you said. So I'm gonna clarify it. Okay, so, so for, for the, for with, clarify it and clarify it and no, no↗

4:38:22Ian MalcolmAnd now you're speaking through the mute, that's pretty wild. you are going to be requested to clarify what you're trying to suggest in, let's say, twenty words or less. That's not a difficult ask. David is trying to get you to consolidate what has been a lot of rambling into a pretty concise statement. Are you capable of doing that?↗

4:38:43Speaker 24Yes.↗

4:38:45Ian MalcolmOkay, perfect. In twenty words or less, try to describe what it is that you are trying to convey to the audience.↗

4:38:50Speaker 24With two verses, I'll do it from scripture. For, for with the judgment you pronounce, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured against the measure. I want to be judged that way. That's the way the world works. I'll use ten more. I'll use ten more words here. Wait,↗

4:39:04Speaker 18hold on, hold on, hold on. Let, let me just ask you↗

4:39:07Speaker 24this.↗

4:39:08Speaker 18I gotta move on. No, listen, That genocide is bad.↗

4:39:19Speaker 24Are, are the Jews that have taken up- No, no, hold on, I'm just asking you a simple question.↗

4:39:23Speaker 18This is so simple, it's really simple. Okay, okay. So do you judge people that openly, intentionally commit genocide to be bad people? Yes. Okay, good. So you think that judgment is okay. Now, also, do you judge people that resist genocide, that speak out against it, that resist it and oppose it, to be good people? Do you think that they are committing acts of goodness by being emissaries of peace and anti-genocide?↗

4:39:58Speaker 24I think you're, I think you're, you're, you're- No, no, hold on. Let's not forget where I'm going or whatever. I'm just asking- You're gonna talk over, I know, and I don't get- No, well, I don It's actually 99. No, I will pause↗

4:40:09Ian Malcolmyou. And he's still speaking through the mute, that's wild. 99. It was you who was over talking, David. He was asking you a very direct question that should have a very easy answer. Is genocide bad? Yes. Are people who conduct it bad? Yes. Are people who object to it good? Yes. Are people who stand in opposition to it to try and protect those that are wounded or dying because of it? Yes. That's obviously a good thing. You should speak out in opposition to it. See how this And this is very straightforward. If you ask me if genocide's bad, I don't have to say, "Well, let me go to this verse from my book." It's pretty direct and obvious. That's why I asked for twenty words or less, and when I suggested that very specific request to you, you said, "Well, let me read this passage." It's unbelievable. Utilize your mind and try and just speak reasonably. That's why these spaces draw the audiences that they do, because it's very easy. We don't need a book, we don't need complex rhetoric, we don't need to redefine what the word overrepresentation means. We just speak bluntly and truthfully. Now please answer David's questions in a concise fashion. And I'm not asking you to keep it concise because I want to limit the amount that you speak, I'm trying to help you, because when you ramble on, you're doing only a disservice to yourself.↗

4:41:30Speaker 24Yeah, there's no rambling. These are direct from scripture and condemning others for, for looking at them and their eyes are- Oh my God. This is so out of context. And you guys can't even listen. It's amazing, you can't even listen to the scripture. That's what's amazing. Can I, can I understand?↗

4:41:49Ian MalcolmNo, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna pause you again. Do you understand that it's utter gaslighting? I, I was trying to help you, and your response is basically to imply that it is us who are doing things wrong as you sit in the listener panel, screeching in the purple pill, asking me to let you come up here. Now, why is it that you want to be here? Because there are lots of people who want to listen to these conversations, 'cause they're direct, they're straightforward, they're easy to follow. Now, your suggestion is that we shouldn't judge others. Let's not do that, right? He who has not sinned throw the first stone or cast the first stone. That's a reasonable thing to suggest. But when people are pelting little children with stones, you can object to it. Obviously. That's the entire purpose for Christ's arrival on Earth was to take action to fix the world and to make it a better place. He didn't just sit there and say, "Let me not judge anyone." No! He said, "You are the synagogue of dot dot dot." He flipped the tables. He also said no to Satan in the desert when he was tempted over and over again. Guess what he had to do to arrive at the conclusion to say no? He had to judge the person and the offer.↗

4:43:09Ian MalcolmYou don't get to sit here and say that you all need to be brain dead. You need to be on life support, not having any conscious thought, because then you might judge somebody. That's probably what a totalitarian psychopath would actually want for all of us. Maybe that's why Elon wants to put the chip into the back of your head so that you can't think, that you can't judge, that you just walk around like a little robot. Yes, thank you for bombing Palestinians, thank you, 'cause I don't wanna judge. No, no, no.↗

4:43:39Ian MalcolmIt's ludicrous. Christ would have thanked all of us for trying to bring attention to those that have less, that are defenseless. That aren't given even, not, not only, let's say a reasonable amount of food, they're not given shelter. In many ways, they're not even given air to breathe, because they're horribly oppressed. That's a literal and figurative statement, obviously.↗

4:44:02Ian MalcolmLittle children are being mass murdered by this regime. For you to sit there and say, "Don't judge them, guys, can't do that," that's insanity. Shame on you for what it's worth, for suggesting that we not do the very thing that we're doing, which is trying to bring attention to those that are less fortunate, to those that are suffering.↗

4:44:24Ian MalcolmYou're not going to win by trying to reverse engineer what it means to judge somebody because you read it in a book. Speak plainly. Speak bluntly. The fact that you have to dodge and divert and deflect is because you're not able to do so, because you're trying to push nonsense for what it's worth. Now, if you wanna try and suggest that the people in charge aren't actually Jews, they are Luciferian, they are evil, they are spirits, they are lizard people. You're welcome to all of that. I think it's laughable, because if I look on Wikipedia and if I look at their own words, they don't say that they're lizard people, they don't say that they're Mormons, they don In film, and they don't say that they're reincarnated people from the past that came here from Atlantis. They say proudly that they are Jews. They then seem to push laws saying you can't criticize Jews, not aliens, not lizard people, not robots. And if you wanna doubt any of that, look at the person in Florida who was just arrested for this very thing. So no, I will judge. I will judge the psychopaths. I will judge the genocidal maniacs. And I will judge the sixty-five percent of Israeli Jews who voted in favor of the literal genocide of every man, woman, child, and animal in Palestine. 'Cause that's insane. And if you suggest that we shouldn't judge these things, then you're either subversive or you're not able to speak out for those that need your voice more than anyone else on this planet.↗

4:45:56Speaker 24It's not all Jews, and you're condemning, hundreds of thousands of↗

4:46:00Ian MalcolmJews.↗

4:46:09Speaker 24No, no,↗

4:46:22Ian MalcolmPause, pause, pause. Even in this very space, I said it's not all Jews, obviously, but if I look at the top of the power structures of the things that I criticize, the very things that in fact even Jews in the media would criticize, like, oh, mass migration, if I look at the people behind that, what do you know? It's Alejandro Mayorkas, a Sephardic Jew, behind mass migration. He let in thirty million people. Is that me blaming all Jews? Am I saying it was the Jews behind mass migration, or am I saying it was a Jew? In this case, Alejandro Mayorkas. That's why I speak very specifically about these things. Who runs Facebook? Who runs Instagram? Who runs Amazon? Who runs Disney? Who runs Netflix? Are they Jews? Yes, they are. Is that me saying it's all of the Jews? Is it the Jew that's making the beggars down the street? Obviously not. But to suggest that I can't collectiveize the group of people that are at the top of these totem poles and draw commonalities across them, that is also ludicrous. It's beyond unreasonable. If they were all Chinese or they were all lizard people or they were all brontosauruses, I would say, "Why are the people at the top of all these companies fifty foot tall dinosaurs?" But they're not. They are frickin' Jews. That's what they are. That's what they call themselves. That's what they marry into. That's what some of them practice. Those who don't say that they are "atheistic Jews." Maybe it's a secular Jew. Maybe it's a rabbinical Jew. But if they're all Jews, there's nothing wrong with me saying that. And you're trying to handcuff and say, "How dare you suggest that? What do you want me to call them?" What is Tony Blinken? Is he a Jewish guy? Or is he a brontosaurus? Answer the question, nin↗

4:48:12Speaker 24Is King Charles a Jew?↗

4:48:15Ian MalcolmIs↗

4:48:15Speaker 24King↗

4:48:15Ian MalcolmCharles a Jew? Now, Truth could go into the lineage of that group if you want to. Let's Truth. Also, so yeah, King Charles↗

4:48:21Speaker 24is a Jew. Let's look at the Saxe Coburg and Gotha bloodline. Let's look at that bloodline.↗

4:48:26Speaker 20Hey, Triple J, you're not gonna let me ask the question? Truth,↗

4:48:29Speaker 25just very quickly, look, look, just so sorry, and then I'll shut up. But look, there's a totally separate thing here, right? You keep saying don't collectivize. Are↗

4:48:41Speaker 25Christ and the prophets. He used, he uses tone eudæica, that is the Greek definite article, that is the exact same as when Ian says the Jews. There isn't no this. You'll hear these retards that don't understand anything about New Testament Koine Greek say, "Oh, well, it's some Jews or, or partial Jew." No, it's tone eudæica. It's the Jews. It's the definite article, Jews. Are you gonna condemn Paul? Do you think you know more than Paul? I think that it's fine. Doesn't make any sense.↗

4:49:09Speaker 24What, the apostles also murdered people? What do you mean? That, that has nothing to do with it. Hold on, hold on. Is there something I apologize,↗

4:49:16Ian MalcolmDavid, we're gonna-- How does he keep getting through the mute? David, I'm gonna go back to you. But nine and nine, I don't know if this is schizophrenia. I don't know if this is an IQ issue. People keep asking you direct questions, kinda similar to other individuals where we ask direct questions, and instead of addressing them honestly, you could say, "I don't know," you could provide an answer that might be contradictory to the very statements that you've been making, but just speak honestly and directly. That's why when you asked me the question about King Charles and the bloodline, what did I do? I said, "Well, let's go to Truth Teller on that one, 'cause I bet he's got all the background on it." And what do you know? Apparently, according to Truth T↗

4:49:56Ian MalcolmNow, given that, let's say that he is, and I bet you truth teller has the receipts for it, do you feel silly that the very person that you pointed to, you were like, "It's not Paul, this group," the very one that you pointed at, the truth teller could suggest is part of that same power paradigm or power structure? Is that weird?↗

4:50:14Speaker 24No, in fact, in fact, King Charles and the whole, it would not be weird, and, and Gotha bloodline, they're not Jews, they're not Jews at all.↗

4:50:22Ian MalcolmIt would not be weird if Truth Teller can demonstrate that King Charles has Jewish heritage, right? And his son as well, William as well, as you'll↗

4:50:30Speaker 24draw some lineage there, Ian. But the fact is that why are you, Triple M, why are you hung up on King Charles' bloodline? Why don't you look at Keir Starmer? The truth is, no, you can Wait a minute, why, Triple Nine, can you, okay, then answer this question. You have a problem when Jews collectivize and say↗

4:50:50Speaker 20the Jews are high IQ, so you tell us you want a high number of Oscars. You wanna listen why is he wanted to play Triple Nine? Because you're not correct. You're not correct, Truth. Why is he wanted to↗

4:51:04Ian Malcolmplay Triple Nine? You're not correct,↗

4:51:09Speaker 24Truth. You're not↗

4:51:09Ian Malcolmcorrect. The House of-- Hey, Paul, I'm gonna mute you. You're just an ass. Hang on, John, hang on↗

4:51:15Speaker 24I am going, I don't know how you're speaking to the truth. Truth, can you put the↗

4:51:19Ian MalcolmKing Charles lineage onto the per- or onto the nest? Could you, could you share that up there? Thank you very much. And nine nine nine, I'm going to ask again, would you feel rather embarrassed if the very person that you pointed at has Jewish lineage?↗

4:51:36Speaker 24absolutely not. Because the majority of the- Wait, okay, now I'm gonna mute you again. Because the majority of the- And you're still speaking through the mute. This is wild. The people of Buckingham Palace aren't Jews, my friend. They're not the Saxe Coburg and Gotha bloodline, they're not Jews, they're Germans.↗

4:51:49Ian MalcolmI don't know how you get through the- How are you still getting through the mute? This is unbelievable. the question was, "Would you feel shame in the event that truth could validate his position that King Charles is Jewish by lineage?" Your response was, "No," immediately after you came up to point to King Charles as evidence that there isn't disproportionate control held by this group, which ironically you wanted to talk about bloodlines. Wow, isn't that a weird one? Like, oh, I don't know, the Pam Bondi bloodline back to Armand Hammer that, Jonathan, aka Decent Backup, just shared today. That's wild! Like, the bloodline, bloodline of other Bolsheviks who seem to run lots of prominent positions in the United States. You know what those bloodlines are? They're not Chihuahuas, they're not the Brontosaurus, they are Jews. And if Truth Teller's able to share that up into the nest, I'm going to remove you because you will have been laughably embarrassed, whether or not you take shame in such.↗

4:52:51Speaker 20I sent it↗

4:52:55Speaker 20to Double Mears. I'm, I'm about to post it. Come on. What's letting me do it so there's three separate posts. One is indicating that the royal bloodline's been polluted since in and around 1821, again when the Rothschilds fully took over the English central bank. One of the favors they got besides, you know, issuing those usurious loans and causing all the wars was also marry in to the royal family. So yes, the royal family may claim a certain bloodline that, you know, guys like Tripleline may feel smart about regurgitating because that's what they want the public to believe. But But again, this particular journalist that I've cited, who no-- whose work, by the way, has never been refuted by anyone, by the way, but then he mysteriously just disappeared. What happened to him? But in fact, it turns out what, what he stated is actually correct. In addition, the fact that, you know, why there's this, obsession with the crown? The crown answers to the Rothschild family and the Jewish bankers in the one square mile city of London. King Charles doesn't even have the authority to enter the one square mile city of London unless he's↗

4:53:59Speaker 20Grants his special permission, otherwise he has no right to enter. And but on the flip side, the one Skirmas City London can send its representative to the Parliament to ensure no laws are ever passed that could ever undermine the authority of that autonomous area, and they, he goes in with five different lawyers to, again, keep track and monitor exactly what, you know, all the bills that are being passed are about to, to ensure they preserve their power and authority at all times. That's how powerful they are. So even if you wanna make the argument, which I already dispute with evidence from again, this, journalist that I've cited, he's more than a journalist, he's, again, he's, he's an expert in this field of, unlocking. Greg Harlow, I believe is his name, and, he, he painstakingly went through and created a chart to indicate how, Queen Eliz-Elizabeth was actually sired, and which, again, she has Jewish bloodline, which means, be- therefore, King William, or not just King William, King Charles is also therefore Jewish because Queen Elizabeth was Jewish. So↗

4:54:59Speaker 20Fine in the nest. But again, that aside, the main power lies in the one square mile city London and, the Banksters that tell the Royal Monarchs what to do. And ask yourself a simple question, why after World War One, you know, they eliminated all of the main monarchies, you know, the, the French one was already gone by seventeen, in the seventeen nineties, and of course, they got rid of the Austro-Hungarian one, the Russian one, the Prussian one, the Ottoman, Ottoman one, all the empires, their kings, their leaders↗

4:55:29Speaker 20On that one, it's only a symbolic, because it's only a symbolic role they play now anyway. The real power again lies with the bankers, 'cause they're the ones who control the monetary policies. Meyer Rothschild once put it, "You give me control of a nation's monetary policy, I care not who sits on the throne, or I care not who makes the laws, 'cause they can control whoever's, you know, in parliament and representing, you know, the supposed people through election, by of course, funding them and controlling them." So This obsession with the crown is just completely baffling to me. You have to understand, there's a hierarchy here. The, the Rothschilds, the, the Banksters, the Kuhn Loeb's, Paul Max, Felix Warburgs, Jacob Schiff's Tell the monarchy what to do, just as, you know, the monarchy just sits, sits pretty. They might have some sh-t, things in their name and, and whatnot, but, they're essentially just play a symbolic role in the UK and have no real power and authority, not even over the army. So it's, again, the, the UK has been so undermined because you hadn't noticed since the Rothschilds took it over. They were bankrupted by 1947. They had to give up their colonies. They were so powerful and strong, why did they↗

4:56:36Speaker 20Rothschild bank, is he your own private banker? Let me ask you a question. So they gave up all their colonies, what does that tell you?↗

4:56:41Speaker 24Yeah, truth, let me ask you a question. The, the House of Russell, who started, up the skull and bones in, in the eighteen hundreds, they've got a lot of good ideas to study. Try to be quiet while I present evidence. Try to be quiet while I present evidence.↗

4:56:59Speaker 24I already know what you're gonna say. Are the, is the House of Russell, it's a very↗

4:57:05Speaker 20simple Are they↗

4:57:08Speaker 24Jews? Is the↗

4:57:08Speaker 20question.↗

4:57:09Speaker 24They're controlled↗

4:57:09Speaker 20by Jews. And yes, they created, they created Skull and Bones with that so-called secret society in universities like Yale, where guys like John Kerry, Cohen attended, by the way, another Jew, because Jews can also be Freemasons, in case you didn't know. So they're controlled by Jews. So the Rothschilds, for instance, not only are the Rothschilds Jewish bankers, so let me ask you, truth, let me ask you, truth, you understand, you understand what it means to be a thirty-third degree Freemason?↗

4:57:35Speaker 24So I I'm gonna ask you a simple question. Do you understand what it means to be a thirty-third↗

4:57:40Speaker 20degree mason? The Jews are in charge, Brian. No one said it's all Jews, but the Jews are in charge, large and in charge. That's what I'm gonna ask you. So they're not all Jews? Got it. Okay, great. I said the Jew-- I didn't say all Jews are in charge. I said the Jews are in charge. Good lord, nine nine nine is retired. So did that mean Saul guy? Good, we never said Saul the Jew, bro. Any way. So nobody said it's all the Jews. This is pure schizophrenia on your part. And of course, you're gonna employ Chavez, Goy, guys like a George W. Bush or Dick Cheney. You know they blamed Dick Cheney for the war in Iraq. Even Hitler said that there were↗

4:58:19Speaker 25shop window Christians, right? Like he said, and he would even say before that, right, right there before that, he says, "And all these things are owned by Jews." And then he, he clarifies and he says, "I say all Jews because even these outliers are just shop window Christians Good to the public so that they can maintain control.↗

4:58:38Speaker 20Yep. Good. But look, he likes to mention King Charles. Why don't you, why don't you discuss what happened to King Charles first? Because Ian doesn't-- The Jews, the Jews had him killed because he maintained a ban on Jews coming back. The↗

4:58:50Speaker 24Jews here, the Jews here,↗

4:58:52Ian Malcolmthe infatuation is rather erotic and creepy for what it's worth.↗

4:58:57Speaker 19Okay, real quick, Ian and, Joann tonight, I mean, Truth, I think you're having fun, right? Why don't we do one, why don't we make it a little more fun, right? Let's, let's-- Well, Wolf,↗

4:59:08Ian Malcolmit almost reminds me for what it's worth, I don't know if, if you're an angler, it almost reminds me of just the individual that's enjoying the little bass and it's struggling so hard, and the fisherman's just like, "How, how quick do I wanna make this for the, the little largemouth bass, which this individual is↗

4:59:32Ian MalcolmYeah. You're welcome to bring up Mitch, Mitch, absolutely.↗

4:59:35Speaker 19Alright, let's, let's, let's do that. He's so annoying.↗

4:59:39Ian MalcolmHe can be, Mitch can be rather annoying. Alright.↗

4:59:43Speaker 19I know. Alright, continue, Mr. Truth Teller. With nine nine nine and, nine nine nine. Yeah, it's just, it's amazing↗

4:59:52Speaker 20to me 'cause prior to '694 there was- I just wonder if he↗

4:59:55Speaker 19has something against Ian particularly. I'm just wondering real quick since, since, since we are on this, I'm just, I'm just sitting back listening. No, the↗

5:00:01Speaker 24point is clear. The point is clear. It's not all Jews and-- What happened to King Charles the first triple nine? It's not even close to what happened to King Charles↗

5:00:14Ian Malcolmthe first nine nine nine. No one says↗

5:00:21Speaker 24Oh, I don't know, Lord Mountbatten, Somerset Belsenoff, House of Eaton, House of, House of, House of Samaglia, House of Aldobrandini, I don't know. All the players behind the scenes that are pulling Luciferian levers that you don't know about. Luciferian levers. Oh, that↗

5:00:37Speaker 25I don't know about. He sounds so triggered. It's so feminine.↗

5:00:40Speaker 24Dude,↗

5:00:41Ian Malcolmthis is, this is all low IQ pro-Satanism. I'm, I'm out of here. It's wild. It is wild. give us a position of power, a person that is in a prominent position of power in the West.↗

5:00:56Speaker 24When was the last time you mentioned the House of Orsini? When was it, like, in the last month? When?↗

5:01:01Speaker 25We list all their, you know what, here's what we're gonna do,↗

5:01:04Ian Malcolmhere's what we're gonna do. No, no, no, hang on, hang on, here's what we're gonna do. Please give us, give us a long, elaborate list of the investments and ownership and the decision making of the Western world of any of the houses that you would like to point to. Please, please demonstrate their mass influence on the West.↗

5:01:22Speaker 24Mass influence on the West, Vibram, I don't know. Let's start, let's start with Vibrams, the, the rubber soles that every, every person wears on the planet, not owned by two- Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, hang on,↗

5:01:32Ian Malcolmhang on. You're, you're not going to go- Rubber soles? To, you're not gonna point to a company, you're not going to point to a massive financial institution, you're not going to point to something that owns the media or academia, you're going to point to a literal invention Why don't you just say, "Oh, they were the ones that invented the rubber in the balloon"? They're everywhere, I see balloons all over the place. They got all the power. Is this, is this a joke? Please, illustrate the massive amount of influence that this family has because they have the patent, I suppose, on the rubber of your shoes.↗

5:02:11Speaker 24They have the, they have the patent, they have the patent on the rubber on everyone's shoes on the planet, my friend. You're s- You're serious? And also, oh, Vibram. And also, oh, Vibram. Just to, just to, just to line out something real fast. Yeah, no. Vibram makes a hundred million dollars a year. You know what's also interesting is, is how much, is how much Italy has influence over, and they're not Jews. These houses aren't Jewish at all.↗

5:02:36Speaker 24how much influence they do have over↗

5:02:38Speaker 20the↗

5:02:39Speaker 24Vatican? They didn't need loans in↗

5:02:41Speaker 201832 if they're so powerful. Yeah,↗

5:02:44Speaker 24okay, we know about the loans in 1832. Okay, so why-- But they're so↗

5:02:46Speaker 20powerful, why would they need loans? Yeah, okay. Well, explain. But they're so powerful. Truth,↗

5:02:50Ian Malcolmtruth, they couldn't, they couldn't, they couldn't monetize, truth, they couldn't monetize the patent for rubber shoes. Truth, truth.↗

5:02:56Speaker 20Remember when you and I- I just asked a simple question, if they're so powerful, why would- No, I'm↗

5:03:07@warsawerikGod's divine presence, thank you God for showing me. Dude, I'm still waiting for↗

5:03:10Speaker 20you to answer. If they're so powerful and influential, why would they need loans from the Rothschilds in 1832 through the Holy See loans? Explain it!↗

5:03:21Speaker 24Does that mean that-- Does that mean these other houses aren't leaving? Have you heard of the Rothschilds requesting a loan from anyone? No, no, no. When was the last time↗

5:03:28Speaker 20Union, Lobe, or-- Why, why don't you just explain that, nine, nine, nine? Just↗

5:03:33Speaker 24explain it. We already know that. So no, we don't know that. I don't know, no, no, no. Explain it. You're the one who says the↗

5:03:38Speaker 20Vatican has superiority and they're more powerful, so why would they need loans from↗

5:03:43Speaker 24the↗

5:03:44Speaker 20Rothschilds?↗

5:03:47Speaker 24Did I say they That has many heads, and it's not all the Jews. No, it's got one head and a big nose. No, it doesn't have one head, truth, it doesn't. Has many heads, many, many different heads. Well, I only disagree to have their tentacles. Many heads and many noses.↗

5:04:03Speaker 20Yes, they like their human trafficking. They like to traffic those many heads that you discussed. Yeah, and they're not all Jews either. It's, it's not all Jews, huh? Do you wanna take, do you wanna take a↗

5:04:11Ian Malcolmwild, do you wanna take a wild guess by the way on the specific sole design by Vittal Brahminy? Do you wanna take a guess when that patent, came up?↗

5:04:24Speaker 24When you say came up, is that, is that business language for expired? You're suggesting that↗

5:04:28Ian Malcolmall rubber soles are owned by this group of people. Do you wanna guess when that patent expired?↗

5:04:34Speaker 24Disqualify your statement. What are you saying?↗

5:04:37@warsawerikDo you want to guess? We own the rubber- Wait a second, Ian, we own the rubber soles. Mitch, you don't- No, no, Mitch,↗

5:04:43Ian MalcolmMitch, the suggestion is that the Berberini family own all rubber soles of all people. Congratulations to the Berberini↗

5:04:51@warsawerikfamily, whoever they are. May they be wealthy and rich, that's wonderful. Yeah,↗

5:04:55Speaker 24Mitch, you don't own anything. You have a, you have a family that has actually taken over the Jews. I actually, actually, no.↗

5:05:04Ian MalcolmI thought I was a wealthy guy. I guess I'm not Yeah, that's kind of funny. for what it's worth, and, and sorry, Lou, we'll go right back to you. so for what it's worth, if anybody wants to go and ask Rock about vulcanized rubber and the patents on rubber shoes, when that initially took place in 1882 with Waitt Webster, who patented the process, that's not the family that you mentioned, then goes on to talk about Humphrey O'Sullivan, the Irish immigrant, followed by specific sole designs, the lug sole perhaps. Like Vitale Bramini in nineteen thirty, but it was Nike's waffle soles, patented in nineteen seventy-four by Bill Bowerman, which came much later, of course, also expired or held by individuals and individual companies, not inclusive of those aforementioned. What does that mean? It means that the statement that you made about owning the patent on all rubber utilized in shoes is preposterous. It's ridiculous. Now you wanted to come in here and say it's all these families, and I asked you for an example, you provided that they control all rubber soles and shoes. First and foremost, they don't. Then I think it was uncensored, you provided that apparently they earn roughly a hundred million dollars. I don't know if that's an annual number or the net worth of the family. But either way, we're talking about groups that manage ten plus trillion dollars in assets, like BlackRock. Who has at the top of it, Larry Fink. It's not the Berminis, not any of these other families that you suggested. And oh, by the way, it's BlackRock that essentially owns companies like, oh, I don't know, Nike that make all of the sneakers with the rubber soles. You would think a wild guess is the biggest investor in Nike, I can almost guarantee you, it's gonna be those three massive companies we talk about all the time. Guess who's not atop of them? Any of the groups of people that you mentioned? You're not doing very well. This is going rather poorly. And I, I, I hate to say it, we're long past the four minutes that we offered, but we do have Mitch here, who might make for a more interesting, let's say, intellectual combatant. And so I will let you go on with your, little nonsense.↗

5:07:13Speaker 19But↗

5:07:13Ian Malcolmplease, please do better than they control the rubber shoes. You sound ridiculous. Bye.↗

5:07:22Speaker 24I cried. I mean, is that a joke? We could go for hours about how much power these Italian families have. These↗

5:07:29Speaker 20boots, okay. Oh, the rubber↗

5:07:31Speaker 24sole.↗

5:07:32Speaker 25Like, did you get the point? Where did that rubber sole shoes come from? Oh my God. Okay, guys.↗

5:07:37Speaker 21Oh, my God. I just wanna say,↗

5:07:42Speaker 19okay, so this is what we're gonna do, right? Wolf, I just wanna, Wolf wanna be clear.↗

5:07:50Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no It wasn't, it wasn't the Federal Reserve, it wasn't central banking, it wasn't ownership of massive media empires, it was incorrectly that they control all rubber soled shoes. I just thought the way↗

5:08:05Speaker 19this is like a really good, funny space. I really like, we got Jake TV, we got Escondon, Sansa, Truth Teller, David, we got Mitch, we got Lou, right? We got Auto Pro, Tom, we got Ian, Malcolm, Joanne. Like one of, like a fantastic- We got lots of rubber↗

5:08:21Ian Malcolmshoes, rubber soled shoes everywhere for Ladies↗

5:08:24Speaker 19and gentlemen, please, we don't need five men, six, seven men at the same time yelling. Get yourself back in order. This isn't a negative space, we're not chimping out. Oh, excuse me, I didn't mean to say that. man, don't chimp out. Excuse my language.↗

5:08:40Speaker 18Who would have thought that Jewish power began in Sumatra? Why don't you guys speak-↗

5:08:43@warsawerikSo, so, so I just wanna say- Mitch, Mitch, Mitch,↗

5:08:50Ian MalcolmMitch, is it, is it, one of these, elusive families that control all these things, or is it-- How↗

5:08:56Speaker 24about the black nobility? How about the black nobility? I just want to tell you, how about the family bloodlines of elusive families that you don't know about? And I just want to say, with all the ketching going on here, this is↗

5:09:11@warsawerikthe most Jewish space I've been to all day.↗

5:09:14Speaker 24You really have no clue who is really running this stuff. Sorry, Mitch.↗

5:09:17Speaker 19Sorry, Mitch. Nine, nine, nine. Relax. Mitch, we apologize. Relax for a second, Mitch. Go ahead and auto-pro. Go ahead to, all you- Nobody has a clue who runs AutoPro. Now, now I'm just- Now, now you're- I just want-↗

5:09:31Ian MalcolmYou can, you can, you can kvetch your way out the room 'cause we've got Eric Warsaw, who I'm very excited to be able to bring up here. Now we have Ian with an unbelievable panel. Ian with all the↗

5:09:41@warsawerikkvetching today, you should↗

5:09:46@warsawerikNo, no, Mitch, for the sake of humor,↗

5:09:49Ian MalcolmMitch, Mitch, for the sake of humor, if you know how to, I'm gonna ask that you turn your device to open microphone so it grabs all the ambient noise. You can play in honor of nine nine nine, fifteen seconds of any song you want, as long as it doesn't have profanity. I don't have↗

5:10:05@warsawerikthe device that I could play a song, and I only got my phone.↗

5:10:07Ian MalcolmOh, alright, well then you can hum or you can mumble a song for ten seconds if you would like.↗

5:10:16Speaker 26You want me to suddenly start singing a song? Oh↗

5:10:25Speaker 26my↗

5:10:30Speaker 26God. You're welcome↗

5:10:34Ian Malcolmto sing a song, Mitch. I don't know, Shimon, Tov, I mean, damn. The, the, the really, the, but no, Mitch, that was, that was pretty interesting. So, Mitch, look, we have lots of disagreements, but I'm curious, did you know that it was a royal bloodline family that, in spite of all Grok's information saying to the contrary, that has ownership and control of every rubber sole that you've ever worn? Did you know that? I don't know↗

5:11:00@warsawerikabout the rubber soles, but you can't deny the fact that the vast majority of the wealth in the world previously and currently is held by nobility. Like, that is obvious and clear. You↗

5:11:13@warsawerikAnd the descendants, like you talked about BlackRock, BlackRock's just an asset manager, right? They don't own the shares, they manage those shares. The biggest investors, State Street, Vanguard, I mean, beyond, then comes, I think, the Singapore, sovereign wealth fund, and after that, I think is the Kuwaiti sovereign wealth fund. So those are the big investors in it. None of that's Jewish. You could point to Larry Fink, but that's like, you know, the von Harnmydoff syndrome of, you know, the Weiz One Jew, but not realizing that, that's not even Jewish wealth. I mean, it's mainly sovereign wealth funds, nobility wealth, the names of which you don't even know. And, you know, at one point, I think the largest, investor of BlackRock, and I think Ian, what's that guy with the mustache and the mullet? I forgot his damn name. The,↗

5:12:02Speaker 25What's the guy's name? Ian Malcolm. Ian, not Ian Malcolm, Ian Carroll.↗

5:12:05@warsawerikRight. He talked about it and he showed that, I think as of two thousand and eight, they obviously sold it up since through the acquisition of Merrill Lynch, Merrill, yeah. Bank of America, Bank of America ain't even a Jewish bank or any Jewish connection, but I'm sure- You mean, you mean Ian Carroll, the trustworthy guy that just had, that just had a, he likes the line, no, but↗

5:12:26@warsaweriklisten, this isn't- Forget about who↗

5:12:31Ian Malcolmhe is. Good work on the hidden money that, is consolidating all this stuff. But at one point, through its acquisition of Merrill Lynch, I think you called it,↗

5:12:37@warsawerikBank America was a forty percent owner of, BlackRock. So this isn't even possible to claim this is Jewish money and it didn't, like, it's just dumb. Like, these are sovereign wealth funds, they vote shares, they manage shares, they don't have power in the way you describe.↗

5:12:54Ian MalcolmVery well delivered, there, Mitch. All right, I like that,↗

5:12:57Speaker 20rebuttal there. So again, you That they have ownership of the sh- well, they, they control the shares, they also have the voting rights. With those voting rights, you can then leverage that to actually then have an influence on who gets voted in in, within the C-suite, the CEO, CEO or CFO. So they do actually exercise a tremendous amount of power and influence, and that's of course underscored by the fact that in two thousand and seventeen, you had Larry Fink who stated that we're gonna force these new behaviors as far as DEI and ESG is concerned on all these corporations, both within the Nasdaq, S&P 500 that they have their own shares in. They own about, around five to seven percent of the shares. Larry Fink controls point↗

5:13:37@warsaweriktwo percent of the shares. Point two percent. Not↗

5:13:40Speaker 20Larry Fink, I said BlackRock. The Singapore sovereign fund is not Jewish. The Singapore sovereign wealth fund is not Jewish. It's just three. There's three. There's BlackRock, State Street, State Street is not Jewish. Bank of America is not Jewish. None of these things have two Jewish. You're gonna make sure you don't have the↗

5:13:59Speaker 20Rosh↗

5:14:00@warsawerikHashanah. I mean↗

5:14:01Speaker 19See how nice that is when you have the mute button. I hate muting truth, I really do, but Mitch, relax.↗

5:14:08@warsawerikI am relaxed. I'm just saying that there is no Jewish control in these things. I mean, you can somehow pretend that truth makes America great,↗

5:14:18Speaker 20but why would Larry think that you will share the Bank of America with him? I posted this interview, by the way. Look, I don't know why would Larry think that they're gonna force change down the growth of the bank. Mitch, please stop interrupting. Why would Larry think that? Who owns the voting bank? Nobody said he didn't have that kind of power and control. He stated unequivocally that we were gonna force change down, down the throats of these corporations to adopt DEI and ESG models, and sure enough, they did, and it obviously impacted sales, 'cause nobody wants to ever have to deal with a quality of outcomes where you have to hire a certain amount of women and minorities, but really that was just a guise for hiring more Jews to say, "Well, now it's more representative." It wasn't hundred percent, listen. But I, I think-- You forgot the point. If Not through, forced DEI equality now, huh? there you go. There you go. Okay. So the DEI, are you, are you, are you gonna tell me the DEI is something, don't do the DEI through BlackRock? Calm it down↗

5:15:13@warsawerikfor a↗

5:15:14Speaker 20second. Calm it down. Are you gonna tell me the DEI wasn't? Okay, I'll, I'll send, I'll put the video, I'll send it to Joanne, she'll put it up in the next. Just take a breath. In fact, I can play the I, I'm, I'm just fine. I don't need to take a breath. I can run marathons, I can swim laps, I'm good. Thank you. I practice intermittent hypoxia, you can try it. Oh, no, no, why not? Hey, I pro- I promote good health. What's wrong with that? Fasting, intermittent hypoxia, grounding, eat less, don't be a fat fuck, don't be a faggot, fast of course, and don't let- Man, you need to get a life. It's terrible.↗

5:15:50@warsawerikYou don't wanna bring up↗

5:15:51Speaker 20trip clubs, do you? I don't wanna↗

5:15:53@warsawerikstart, because what,↗

5:15:54Speaker 20who's the,↗

5:15:54Speaker 26who's↗

5:15:55Speaker 20the main club owner? Let's not go there. Isn't it, David Gruenman? Doesn't David Gruenman run all the major clubs?↗

5:16:05@warsawerikI wanna, I don't respect me enough to say anything, but we shouldn't go to the trip club interview. Let's not do that. What do you define as having a life? Okay, I don't wanna go down this path. I just wanna address the point, like, we can stop He wanted to promote it because it had the wide support of those shareholders. He was imposing↗

5:16:24Speaker 18it.↗

5:16:24@warsawerikNo, no, no, no, no, stop for a second, stop. This had the wide support of those shareholders that are Van Gage, Strate, Seed, Singapore Wealth Fund, Bank of America Kuwaiti fund and other of the wealth that they manage, because that is what they-- those aren't Jews, that is the wide support of many shareholders of the diverse ownership, a diverse customer base, nobility, et cetera. So pretending that he's just acting on his own agenda, no, he is implementing what his customers want him to do, and they continue to put their money with him if they didn't- How do you know they wanted to↗

5:16:59Speaker 18do it?↗

5:17:00@warsawerikBecause it's very simple, if they didn't, they would move their money somewhere else. Because they care↗

5:17:04Speaker 23about the returns, retard. They don't care about the DII. Of course↗

5:17:07@warsawerikthey care about the returns. Right.↗

5:17:08Speaker 23Oh yeah, so you're telling me they're gonna stack it, they're gonna stack it by returns for DII thinking they're gonna still manage with the returns? Is BlackRock the only-- Oh, your returns are three percent lower than the market, but at least you're having a bunch of minorities. Yeah. Nobody thinks that way,↗

5:17:21@warsawerikdumbass. BlackRock, the only capable manager of money in the world? Well, hang on, Mitch, Mitch, Mitch, hang on, Mitch, Mitch, hang on, Mitch, don't, don't↗

5:17:32Ian Malcolmmake me mute you. I will mute you if I have to. Mitch, true or false? currently, Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is also essentially and effectively running the WEF, and true or false, Donald Trump has made suggestions, if not confirmation, that he is going to be appointing one of the heads of BlackRock Rock to run, if I'm not mistaken, the Federal Reserve.↗

5:17:57@warsawerikI don't know↗

5:17:58Ian Malcolmabout that.↗

5:18:01Speaker 20Double mute, Mitch.↗

5:18:05@warsawerikYes, I know. I don't have any- It is, it's Rick Reed. Rick Reed is the one who's↗

5:18:10Speaker 20being interviewed to become the director of the Federal Reserve. Is your name Richard? I'm just telling you. He's a Jewish guy from BlackRock that may take over the Federal Reserve. Calm↗

5:18:16@warsawerikdown, like, do- This is what you do, it's so sad. Well, I was just, I was↗

5:18:20Speaker 20just↗

5:18:20@warsawerikcomplimenting his point. You need, you need a hobby, man, a hobby. Like, stop. What's your hobby?↗

5:18:26Speaker 23Gambling? Going down↗

5:18:34Speaker 18I just found it very odd that he makes a comment and who responds↗

5:18:38Speaker 23and who↗

5:18:39Speaker 19doesn't respond. I don't like what you call the IQ level back up. I think we have to change this to the end of the document now because we're about to start swinging around here.↗

5:18:48@warsawerikThey can't stop me now. I don't know what Lawrence's, role in the WEF is. I'd have to look that up. I'm not aware. But if you are Lawrence,↗

5:18:57Speaker 20he's a co-chair. He's a co-chair. He's the chairman.↗

5:18:59@warsawerikWhatever, just shut up for five seconds. No, it's not, it's not whatever. That's pretty significant. I'm helping you with your information↗

5:19:07Speaker 20asymmetry so this way you don't sound like a dumbass. Listen, you don't have any information. You just make shit up.↗

5:19:12@warsawerikOh, I just,↗

5:19:13Speaker 26you didn't know that↗

5:19:14Speaker 20Rick↗

5:19:20Speaker 20Yeah, yeah, you didn't, I guess, know about that DI and ESU were being forced by Larry to be bought by all these corporations. The amount of times, the amount of times that I've had↗

5:19:27@warsawerikto debunk this firehosing guy. When have↗

5:19:29Speaker 20you ever debunked me? You've never gotten anywhere. You've lost multiple times in debates with me. It's not even close. I've lost. Well, why isn't it that? I don't understand. This is why you↗

5:19:37Speaker 26blocked me, 'cause you're afraid of me now. Like, I↗

5:19:42@warsawerikunderstand. Oh, I'm so Hang↗

5:19:50Ian Malcolmon, so if, if Donald Trump is gonna go, no, no, we have to go to the next question without answering that. No, I don't wanna have to mute, I will hit the mute button. If the head of BlackRock is being sent off to not only run the World Economic Forum where Donald Trump gets to be a featured highlighted speaker, as the CIO of BlackRock becomes the chairman of the Federal Reserve, as Larry Fink then departs the WEF to go over and to basically try and build the drawdown between Ukraine and Russia. Is it reasonable to say that BlackRock has absurd amounts of control, not only of these geopolitical events, but also, oh, I don't know, major waterways and ports that the Trump administration has turned over to private companies? Is that kind of unusual?↗

5:20:39Speaker 23Ian, and who just got disinvited from the conference? Oh my God. Like, why ask the question if you don't like that this↗

5:20:45@warsawerikgoes on like this?↗

5:20:46Speaker 23Who just got disinvited from the conference? Let me just finish my answer to the first question. I'll tell you, Iran for industry. Gee, who does that benefit? Jews? Of course, why would you want a↗

5:20:58@warsawerikterrorist regime? Why the fuck would we want a bunch of Israeli Jews, you're retarded? Because we're smart and capable and accomplished. Now let me finish the answer to the first question. Whether you like it or not, you're all just jealous of the success. Yeah, Iran↗

5:21:10Speaker 23puts a bunch of fucking satellites in outer space.↗

5:21:13@warsawerikMr. Liu, you're not, you're not, you're not jealous of that Siberia of almighty and powerful. Unfortunately, Mr. Iranians, or they are going down,↗

5:21:22Speaker 20or they are going down. And then you can say, "Yeah, you're just jealous." So which is it, Mitch? You can't have it both ways. Five hundred↗

5:21:27@warsawerikjet, didn't you used to tell us there's like five hundred underground, wait a minute, aren↗

5:21:36Speaker 20Almighty, and it's just a terrible thing. What happened, what happened to your↗

5:21:38@warsawerikIranian secret underground, I'm just asking↗

5:21:41Speaker 20the question, man. And the secret underground air force, so now, answer the question, or are the Jews all powerful and mighty? You have to answer the first question before I get to the fifth question. Wow, I'm just saying, but you just made a point that you guys are not all powerful and mighty. I have to answer the first question before I get to the fifth question. Wow, I'm just↗

5:21:56Speaker 19saying, but you just made a point that you guys aren't I'm, you know, like, what is it called, a court hearing for divorce or something? Like, we, we figure out paperwork right now here. Hang on. Well, if they spurt out when I'm here, look at, look↗

5:22:10@warsawerikat this, they spurt out, it's amazing. They can't control themselves. Give it to me, hang on,↗

5:22:13Speaker 19hang on. I mean, listen, listen. I mean, you, you, you two obviously have history with one another. Oh yeah. Alright, Wolf, Wolf, I also wanna give a big, I wanna give a big welcome again to, Eric. Go ahead. Oh, okay. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I was just, I was just trying to↗

5:22:30Ian Malcolmwelcome Eric because I know he does a lot of work on, on TikTok, has done work on YouTube, is growing and becoming a huge voice on X. He's been in spaces with us, perhaps not ones this hostile, It's an unusual dynamic, but this is about, this is about what you should expect when we try to have open forums and discussions. And Eric just really quickly wanted to check in with you before you get back to the pickering. I know↗

5:22:56@warsawerikI'm making- Appreciate you very much. yeah, I'm, I'm, I'm kind of winding down off TikTok, I'm, I'm kind of closing up shop over there af- after the, Larry Ellison took over and everything like that, it, it's completely ruined TikTok. I'm huge on Going fast on X, but, this is so much better, man. As much as people complain about like how the censorship on X, it's, it's nothing compared to TikTok and stuff, man. You have to use TikTok, language and all that stuff, coded language all the time and everything. And this is, typical, man. I, I don't know how people can argue against Jewish control Through BlackRock to all these other companies and stuff like that. It's like it's just a complete denial of reality, man, for real. I mean, I thought, I thought that was already like kind of, such common knowledge now that it's kind of taken for granted, but I guess no one's taking for granted, huh? They're just still denying that? Of course it's silly, it's a↗

5:23:52@warsaweriksilly claim. It's the concept of people looking at the world and looking for the Jew playing Werewaldo. The Jews control China, do they control India, do they control the media in the world? Not very hard to play Werewaldo. The Jews did destroy↗

5:24:06Speaker 20China for a hundred and fifty years. Did you forget about the David St. family? This is exactly what I just saw. It's an inability to see the world. It's an inability to see the world for what it is. Oh, the St. family that moved there in 1834, they were importing opium, they were importing And then they married into the Rothschild family. You gotta stop lying, come on, man. It's just, you're gonna, you're gonna tell me they didn't destroy China for a hundred and fifty years? It is simply the↗

5:24:31@warsawerikfoolish behavior of looking around and finding the truth and all of that. No, no, no. Why don't you condemn David Sassoon and his↗

5:24:35Speaker 20biggest, and the biggest opium, finding the truth and pretending that that isn't the reality? I do miss the truth from David. Why are there so many divisional mando? David Sassoon, David, he had The world and the biggest drug trafficking ring in the world, you condemn↗

5:24:58@warsawerikthose? There's no drug, drug trafficking control of the world, it's like crazy. We make↗

5:25:09Speaker 20that up. In any case, can I get the list of our subpoena? They have multiple, May the makes up part of Argentina and Chile, do you condemn them?↗

5:25:28@warsawerikJews didn't write anything in Argentina. In any case, don't, don't, don't condemn it like that. Do you or don't you? I mean, like, you don't have a clue how crazy you guys sound like the forest fires in Argentina are now because of the Jews. Do you understand how? Yes,↗

5:25:42Speaker 20the Jews lit the fires in Argentina. They're literally a fucking Jew. This is why I call you two worthless people. You like to blow it up, you like to blow it up, you like to Oh, even what is the truth? The truth is not the truth. Now you're lighting trees on fire because you hate trees. You just hate oxygen, admit it. See, people think that you↗

5:26:04@warsawerikare anti- see, people think that you are anti-Jew. You guys are Jew worshippers. If you didn't have the Jew, what would you do with your day? Like, Ian, what would you- We would live freely. No, we want, we↗

5:26:16Speaker 20want to be free. That's what we want. We want to be↗

5:26:20@warsawerikfree. Are you a Christian? Are you a Jew? And Do you associate with whiteness? So I'm↗

5:26:25Ian Malcolmfir-firmly Christian. Firmly Christian. We have a good-- Do you notice I've never↗

5:26:29@warsawerikheard you have a space about the greatness of Jesus, how to improve the church?↗

5:26:35Ian MalcolmThat's,↗

5:26:35@warsawerikthat's, that's radically↗

5:26:37Ian Malcolmnot true. I've done, I've done many, many spaces on the-- Talking with Dustin doesn't make me a proponent of the-- Yeah, this is a lot of people aren't↗

5:26:44@warsawerikeven-- Talking to Dustin Nemos doesn't count for how to improve Christianity. I also talked↗

5:26:49Ian Malcolmto Donnie Darken. I talked What it's worth, but that's still talking about Jews.↗

5:26:56@warsawerikAdam Green isn't the baby of Jews. Yeah, I mean, that's a fair comment on Adam↗

5:26:59Ian MalcolmGreen. But if I'm, if I'm, if I'm sitting and talking about any number of things that have nothing to do with Jews, like movies, is that, you're gonna attack me for that as well? Even when you talk about movies, is it wrong if I talk about Star Wars, for example, if I do a four-hour space on the Star Wars trilogy and it just so happens?↗

5:27:15@warsawerikListen, yesterday you're com- Well, yesterday I listened to you talk about how Star Wars is a Jewish series demonizing the white man. Like, I↗

5:27:22Ian Malcolmdon't think- I would say, I would say the new rendition of the Disney owned Star Wars has done exactly that, and who sits at the top of Disney, Mitch?↗

5:27:28@warsawerikWhy? Why? Why? How would you- Answer the↗

5:27:30Ian Malcolmquestion, Mitch. Who's the good guy? Who- Who are the↗

5:27:32@warsawerikstormtroopers in that movie? Are the stormtroopers white?↗

5:27:35Ian MalcolmNo, actually, the stormtroopers black that becomes the good guy↗

5:27:45@warsawerikThe dark-skinned guy who was Bob Iger, the guy with the backpack,↗

5:27:48Speaker 23he runs Disney. Yeah,↗

5:27:49Ian Malcolmhe looks very well of Boba Fett and Jango Fett from which he clones were derived. But, hang on, Mitch, but somehow despite the lore of Jango Fett being the original stormtrooper and all of them being clones of him, they've got a black guy who's the stormtrooper who becomes the good guy and then basically helps to, to win the battle as the sole white man that is prominently in the film is of course the villain. You know, The white guy is, oh, that's right, he's the other red-haired villain. You know who's not? Is the white woman, the black guy, the Middle Eastern guy, and all the other diversity hires, with the exception of the original cast, which includes Mark Hamill, a Jew, Harrison Ford, a Jew, Carrie Fisher, who I believe is a Jew. All three of them! And they, because they are the original, they have to die because we gotta get rid of the past to usher in modernity. So they kill off all those characters. Spoiler alert for anybody that hasn't seen them. They're garbage films. They're universally panned by all the critics. They take all the things that were good about the original stories that were constructed by George Lucas, not Jewish! And he made a wonderful film, he made a wonderful story. It had values and character. It wasn't just mindless slop. And Bob Iger and Disney bought that franchise and they've turned it into junk and garbage. And yes, you're correct, it completely derails from the original ideology that Jango Fett, who you're trying to think of, is the origin story to the stormtroopers, who again, in the new films, happens to have a black guy. Because, oh, what do you know? Almost every movie that we see, it's the black hero. As the whites are the villains or the incompetent fools. So thank you for validating even further my point, and now I'm gonna go look up to see if Carrie Fisher is Jewish.↗

5:29:37@warsawerikBut Boba Fett wasn't.↗

5:29:41Ian MalcolmWhat are you trying to say?↗

5:29:46Ian MalcolmBoba↗

5:29:46@warsawerikFett was a dark-skinned man. I don't know, he was, he was a brown↗

5:29:51Ian Malcolmfellow. He certainly- I don't know what↗

5:29:52@warsaweriknationality he is. The black character from the thin↗

5:29:55Ian Malcolmportrayal.↗

5:29:56@warsawerikThat's right, but he's not a dark-skinned, he's not a white guy, it's not demonizing white guys, this is an alien film, like- You're literally turning a movie about alien species into like a dynamic of white demonization, it's crazy. But that's- That's like the white heart syndrome. No, no,↗

5:30:12Ian Malcolmno, no, no, Oh, to great lengths anyway about the new films, Mitch. That's a perversion of what we discussed. We discussed the religion and the ethos of the mythology of the original six films. Those are largely free and devoid of some of the toxic messaging that is in the new stuff, which, if you want me to dive into, I certainly could, and how seemingly under the Disney ownership, they have perverted the entire franchise to demoralize the people that are fans of the original films. But to suggest that we sat there and talked about how all the new stuff just demonizes, no, we didn't. We walked through and we talked about Yoda, we talked about him lifting the plane out of the bog, what that symbolizes. We talked about the idea of the Force! How it is talking about the ether. We tried to put out good, positive messaging. Now it's not my fault that I wake up every single day and I see another thing that validates my worldview. Most recently, literally a person being almost arrested, if not arrested, I don't know the exact story, in the United States for their quote-unquote antisemitism. Why do I have to exist in that world, Mitch? If I woke up and it was people that were talking about the royal bloodlines, the families that owned all the shoes, and they were getting arrested, I would talk about that power structure. If I looked at all the degenerate media and it was controlled by brontosaurus people, I would talk about that. But instead, I look around and almost all the things that are deteriorating the West are run by Jews. That is just the state of the world. They're also blowing up the Palestinians, now they're provoking Donald Trump, who's clearly subservient to them, whose daughter is married into them, whose son is now engaged to a woman whose father has won the, it's not the Nobel Peace Prize of Israel, but it's something parima or tantamount to it. Why are all of these people in charge in bed with Jews, Mitch? It's not Jango Fett, he's not pulling the strings on the White House. It's Miriam Adelson, it is Jews, it is the Epstein list, it is Maxwell, they are Jews. I don't know what you want me to tell you, there's nothing remotely hateful about this. I'm trying to make the world better and the people who are behind a lot of the strings that seem to be making it worse are Jews. If it was Joba the Hut, I would talk about that, but it's not. And you can pretend like that isn't the case, but we can look at almost every one of these different renditions of power, even the one that perverted Star Wars, and Bob Iger is Jewish. Why? Why does that continuously happen, Mitch?↗

5:32:53Ian MalcolmSo you were-↗

5:32:58Ian MalcolmI think you're double muting, Mitch.↗

5:33:01@warsawerikYou live for the mute button, it's your favorite thing to do. I didn't press↗

5:33:04Ian Malcolmit.↗

5:33:05@warsawerikGeorge Lucas wrote the original films, correct?↗

5:33:07Ian MalcolmThat is correct. He's not Jewish.↗

5:33:09@warsawerikHe's not Jewish, but he used a lot of Jewish ideology and metaphors in them, like, for example, what Yoda says about, fear leads to anger. What Judaism do you believe is↗

5:33:17Ian Malcolmin the original films?↗

5:33:18@warsawerikLet me just finish what I'm saying. No, no, no, no,↗

5:33:21Ian Malcolmyou said there's a lot of Judaism.↗

5:33:22Speaker 23Oh,↗

5:33:24@warsawerikhe's not making it Jewish. Here we go↗

5:33:31Ian MalcolmNo, I will mute you. You're correct. You said that there's a lot of Jewish themes in the original Star Wars. List off five Jewish themes that are in the movies.↗

5:33:40@warsawerikSure, I'll just give one for now, just what Yoda says about fear leading to hate, hate leads to anger, hate, hate leads to suffering. You believe that that is↗

5:33:47Ian MalcolmJewish?↗

5:33:48@warsawerikYes, that very much comes out of the Gemara, for sure, no question about it.↗

5:33:50Ian MalcolmOkay, why do you believe that that is a statement that is Jewish? The Rabbis said that the three things that lead to↗

5:33:58@warsawerikBut he, he, he, he said that himself that he used a lot of metaphors from Judaism in his writings. This isn't like a big- You,↗

5:34:05Ian Malcolmyou've supposedly gone for one, which I would combat. What are the other four?↗

5:34:10@warsawerikI'm telling you what he said. Forget about what I said. what↗

5:34:12Ian Malcolmhe said. Okay, so you're just going to pretend that you heard "Once Upon a Time" that it's all Jewish and therefore you're gonna make a blanket statement that you can't defend, and then when I press you on it, you're just gonna shrug it off, right? The concept↗

5:34:22@warsawerikof the Force, these are religious metaphors. But then they also apply to↗

5:34:25Ian MalcolmChristianity.↗

5:34:28@warsawerikThe Jedi side. The concept↗

5:34:31Speaker 23of the Force is irrelevant. Whether they apply to Christianity or not is irrelevant. Whether they, whether they You're missing the point. See, they keep these things, these things, you just↗

5:34:44@warsawerikdon't know what we do. But the end of the day, this is something that the customer of diversity loved these movies. New↗

5:34:50Ian MalcolmStar Wars is subversive. The old Star Wars, no, it's not subversive. Let's pause again. We did the entire space on the original six films, Mitch. The point was that they weren't subversive, that they were uplifting, that they had good messages. Do you know who talked about subversion? Subverting the audience and their expectations is literally Ryan Johnson, who did the second film in the new trilogy, The New Ones, made under Disney, run by a Jew, said they were going to subvert the expectations. People don't think I'm making this up, go type into Google or Grok, did Ryan Johnson, I believe it's spelled R Y N Say he was going to subvert expectations of the audience. Is that produced under the ownership of Disney and Jews, Mitch? The answer is yes.↗

5:35:40Ian MalcolmSo who is doing the subversive behavior? The people that are telling you that they are subverting the expectations, or is it perhaps the guy who is suggesting that we talked about the perversion of the Star Wars films, describing a space in which we talked about the beauty of those films? You're not an idiot. You might just be lying, perhaps you're misremembering, but don't just make blanket statements like, "Well, he based it on Judaism." You couldn't give one good example of that. You gave one, it was awful, and when you were pushed back on, you just hand waved the other four. Then you made blanket statements that were incorrect about the space that I hosted so that you could add it to the fuel of the claim that I only talk about the subject, which I don't.↗

5:36:26Ian MalcolmSo we keep catching you in these very inaccurate statements that you'd seemingly take no shame in. It's totally fine, I appreciate the tone and the delivery, I will continue muting you if you don't allow us to have a dialogue about these things, and if you railroad or deflect when I press you on statements that you make that are clearly inaccurate.↗

5:36:45Ian MalcolmAll right.↗

5:36:52Speaker 19I love the double mute. Okay,↗

5:36:53@warsawerikallow, allow me to answer, but don't interrupt. Farian, in Star Wars, let's go through some of the things that you could say are associated with Judaism. Jedi is reminiscent of the word Yehudi. Yoda is similar to the word Yodea, which means knowledge in Hebrew. Vader, father, father means that is a Yiddish word for father. There is the Force, the divine. The Force is often compared to the Jewish concept of Hamakom. The place, Yitzhak Rabin, Yitzhak Rabin, the good inclination, bad inclination, the struggle between dark and light, tshuva, repentance, dark fate's final act of saving his sons, is frequently alluded to in tshuva. I could go on, but there are many Jewish themes that George Lucas chose consciously to include in his film, and you love them.↗

5:37:38Speaker 23Thanks, once again, you do a great job. Why wasn't there any usury involved? Or an usury plot in the movie of it's so Jewish, according to you. George, George Lucas also talked about how it's Eastern↗

5:37:49Ian Malcolmreligions that almost entirely influenced the story. I just want to make the one simple↗

5:37:53@warsawerikpoint, Ian. The one simple point. Films are not subversive, films are whatever you interpret them, just like there's songs. You know, my favorite- Really? Listen, I'll say this. My favorite, Growing Up, my favorite, my favorite- Can you interpret "Boogie Nights" any other way than promotion↗

5:38:09Speaker 20of the↗

5:38:09@warsawerikporn industry? My favorite band was Pearl Jam Put out videos for one of the reasons, he didn't want to put the interpretation on the song that everybody takes from a song what they, what it means to them. Movie means to you what it means to you, means something else to someone else. But if you think that Hollywood is bad, I don't, I think it's bad and good. Then why, if you think that too much interpret the song, too much Hollywood, my my cardi B, can that be misinterpreted in some way? At different Hollywood, go and build a fund and build a studio and produce, I love the thing↗

5:38:42Speaker 23of And they kill Gaddafi. This is a free country of↗

5:38:46@warsawerikmeritocracy. If you think that you could do and build a better widget, build the better widget. Meritocracy makes all my-- Build the better Hollywood, call it something else, but don't cry about what exists when you're capable of making it better.↗

5:39:04Ian MalcolmHey, hey, hey, Mitch, how did that work out for TikTok?↗

5:39:08@warsawerikIt didn't work out for TikTok.↗

5:39:10Ian MalcolmYeah. Build your own social media↗

5:39:12@warsawerikapp if you don't like Jews running TikTok is a bunch of Jews. TikTok wasn't American created, TikTok was a foreign created, where they had one algorithm for the Chinese and another algorithm for Americans.↗

5:39:24Ian MalcolmMitch, who invented TikTok? What, what country of origin is TikTok from?↗

5:39:29@warsawerikI don't know, but I know it was owned by the Chinese. How do you↗

5:39:31Ian Malcolmnot know the answer to that question? I'm not a social media like- Are you being obtuse intentionally or are you just ignorant?↗

5:39:39@warsawerikAs far as I know, it was a Chinese corporation. You wanna tell me other places? Okay, so now↗

5:39:43Ian Malcolmyou're, now you're admitting that you know where, in fact, it came from. Okay. So I don't know if that was a lie before or what happened. I said that, and you corrected me. So I don't know what the hell I said wrong. Okay, so now you said you are aware, you are aware↗

5:39:59@warsawerikthat it was a Chinese company. Why was TikTok sold Abilities, and then they have a separate algorithm for America that promotes↗

5:40:12@warsawerikstupidity,↗

5:40:17Ian Malcolmtwerking. I don't know where I heard it from. In any case,↗

5:40:25@warsawerikto finish what I'm saying.↗

5:40:29Ian MalcolmNo, no, It's a recorded space, Mitchell Nye. You said, "I don't know, I'm not a social media guy." Those are your specific words. I said, "Those are your specific words." I said, "You don't know."↗

5:40:40@warsawerikAnd then you said, "Where was it? Who was created?" And I said, "Well, I, I thought it was Chinese, but it's not Chinese, then tell me." But as far as I know, it's Chinese. But you're well↗

5:40:48Ian Malcolmaware, you're well aware of the content↗

5:40:53@warsawerikthat's around the algorithm.↗

5:40:59Ian MalcolmSo why was it↗

5:41:04Ian MalcolmNo question about it. But the point that I'm making- No question, no↗

5:41:30Ian MalcolmMitch, hit, hit the microphone button. I heard you for a second. Stop↗

5:41:33@warsawerikwith the mute, for God's sakes. Comment down below. Well, then↗

5:41:35Ian Malcolmdon't interrupt when I try to ask you a question. Man, I'm trying to answer↗

5:41:39@warsawerikthings and you keep muting me. Like, it's not reasonable. The point is, the American government, from my perspective, decided they didn't want a foreign hostile government influencing, controlling an algorithm that influences the youth and the people of America, so they don't get↗

5:41:52Speaker 23their kids really, really, really, really, really,↗

5:41:55Ian Malcolmreally, really, It was TikTok sold to? I think, I think it is, the guy who owns↗

5:41:59@warsawerikParamount, Ellison, I think.↗

5:42:03Ian MalcolmYes, well, it was actually his father, David Ellison owns Paramount and Skydance, his father owns Oracle and now owns TikTok. Do you know the other companies that invested in it?↗

5:42:13@warsawerikNo idea, teach me the ones that invested in it. And is it↗

5:42:15Ian MalcolmAndreessen Horowitz? Do you wanna take a wild guess, the ethnicity of the people at the top of that organization? But did he acquire it? Wait a second,↗

5:42:22@warsawerikI have a question, just a question Through some force or acquired it in a competitive bid. Who, who just suggested↗

5:42:30Ian Malcolmthat the company was forced to be sold? Ian Malcolm could have bought it.↗

5:42:33Speaker 20No, that's okay, so I can explain this one. I can explain this one very easily. The government handed the bid over. Bought↗

5:42:46Speaker 23it.↗

5:42:47Speaker 20Just the second. I'll listen one out. Can you explain the way we're doing this? Mitch, Filed this for you in one minute if you'll allow me. Now, it was acquired by Larry Ellison's team, Larry and David Ellison's team, of course, with Anderson Horowitz, et cetera, because they were the ones preferred by the government, because they were, of course, donors to Trump, in addition to the fact that they're also recipients of, well, money through Operation Star Gate. But that aside, they weren't even the best bid. Their offer of around thirteen, fourteen billion dollars was actually below the income of just TikTok US in↗

5:43:21Speaker 20twenty twenty-three in the US, which Below one year's revenues, which makes absolutely no sense. If you are a real real estate investor, investor in general, you all know that you have to give it at least a three, four x multiple just for a typical company. For tech companies, they easily get valued at fifteen to twenty x, yet these guys are able to acquire, take on the US↗

5:43:41Speaker 25for↗

5:43:43Speaker 20billions higher. There were more companies that were higher. I can, I haven't looked at the, the story was months ago, it's back in like September 10th. I'm making the claim. I'll go back and look. That's not the point. The point I'm trying to make is they were able to underbid and scoop it up for a price and valuation that made no sense.↗

5:43:59@warsawerikThe financial terms of any bidding process isn't the pure decision maker. This wasn't an open bid. This was a, this was a selective bid. Stop, stop, stop with this behavior. There are other terms. I don't know what those terms are, but there are other terms that are relevant to the decision of whether or not they're going to be↗

5:44:14Speaker 23used. That's what the terms were, and↗

5:44:15@warsawerikthat's↗

5:44:15Speaker 23why they want. Such as what? So again, more Jew worshiping, every time there's a↗

5:44:19Speaker 20bid, even the Jews literally bought it. Why does he don't want to-- Yes↗

5:44:31Speaker 20Why did Paul Singer get the bid on↗

5:44:33@warsawerikSitco?↗

5:44:34Speaker 20They didn't↗

5:44:34@warsaweriklose, but they-- What are the other terms? Sure. Why did Paul Singer get the bid on TikTok? Why did he throw a lot of bids on the assets of Greenlight? Why didn't you throw a lot of bids on the assets of Greenlight? And if you're in business, you know that.↗

5:44:43Ian MalcolmHang on, Mitch. So I just wanna rewind this for everybody. So it was Mitch who initially said he didn't know where TikTok was from, then he said it was China, then it was Mitch who told us Oh, I have to keep muting you. Then it was Midge who said that they forced, by they, the US government forced the sale of TikTok because you could weaponize social media against the people. It was then Mitch, who, well, I guess he didn't necessarily say that it was sold to Larry Ellison correctly, he got close enough, he said it was the guy over at Paramount, that's his son, David Ellison, because what do you know? The same family that owns Oracle and TikTok also owns thirty percent of the mainstream media. Wow, what a weird coincidence, one family. Man, you could almost say that that one family in and of itself is a over-representation across essentially all of technology, social media, and- The film industry just that one set of father and son, speaking of Star Wars. oh, by the way, to go back to father and son, Luke, I am your father. I asked Grok because I love to use intellect. I asked Grok To go and look at the original Star Wars trilogy, to compare it to the major religions of the world, and to stack rank the influence of those religions in accordance with anything available on George Lucas or the original production team for their relation and ties to those films, for what it is worth, ranked influence on the original trilogy. Daoism, number one, the strongest single influence. The force as a flowing, impersonal energy that permeates everything, requires harmony and balance, the yin yang parallels of the light and the dark, and rewards non-forceful actions. Do or do not. There is no try. Mirrors one of the most fundamental core Daoist principles like the Tao. That is number one. It then goes on to say Buddhism. Joseph Campbell's Comparative Mythology. Hinduism, number four. Christianity, number five. Gnosticism, number six. Zoroastrianism, I don't even know if I pronounced that right. The cosmic moral dualism, I'll read this one out, of good light, evil dark, is number seven. Number eight is Shinto, via Japanese culture, samurai influences, reverence for spirits and energy in nature. number nine, coming in at number nine is Judaism and the Abrahamic motifs, minor echoes, minor echoes in chosen one and messianic prophecy, moral law or code, Jedi codes as ethical disc disciplines. Number ten is Islam. The one that you wanted to suggest, bitch, is number nine out of the ten religions. Think about that for a second. Gnosticism, the idea of knowing as a religion, was considered two places above Judaism. So the next time that you say, "Oh, Star Wars is Jewish," after accusing us of suggesting that everything is Jewish, at least do it with an ounce of humility, or otherwise we'll embarrass you, as we tend to do in these spaces. So thank you very much for that.↗

5:48:18@warsawerikBut I really- Why didn't you- But at least you said it's not, but Ian, I never said Judaism was the only influence in Star Wars, I said it was one of them. I didn't claim it's the only influence. Well, at the↗

5:48:26Ian Malcolmvery bottom of the list,↗

5:48:28Speaker 23minor. MrBeast Consortium, yes, MrBeast from YouTube and Roblox co, non-Jewish, thirty billion dollars, still lost out to Jews who bid half that much, fourteen billion dollars. There's also another bidder, the Kevin O'Leary group from, The Shark Tank and a bunch of other investors, not Jewish, bid between twenty to thirty billion dollars, still way over the Jewish bid of fourteen billion dollars. So somehow Jews still managed to win it by bidding fifty percent of what the best bid was. And why?↗

5:49:03@warsawerikYou have to answer the why. Because they're fucking Jews. That's why. Because↗

5:49:05Speaker 20Donald Trump, no, because just because they put forward a bid to go to Larry Ellison, that's why. It's actually that same argument. Because you put forward a bid↗

5:49:11@warsawerikdoesn't mean you're able to fulfill on that bid. Are you credible to close? What are the other terms of the deal? Are there concessions made to the government?↗

5:49:19Speaker 20Amazon was one of the bids here. I didn't hear you telling me Amazon wouldn't be qualified because it has the highest↗

5:49:24@warsaweriknumber. I have had plenty of↗

5:49:26Speaker 20property↗

5:49:33Speaker 20If you're just like preferential treating,↗

5:49:35Ian Malcolmthen you're selecting with the highest bidder. Wait a second, Mitch, you're doing it again because what you're now suggesting is that there were alternative reasons that would result in Larry Ellison being able to buy TikTok at less than fifty percent the value that was offered by other groups. Not just one, but apparently more than two had higher bids, and you are saying, "Well, there's some other reason they might have been qualified for some other purpose." What do you think that that other purpose might be, Mitch?↗

5:50:06@warsawerikWe have to go look at what are the other terms associated with that bid is.↗

5:50:11Ian MalcolmOh, you don't think it has anything to do? Perhaps it's creating a media and software empire under Larry Ellison, who is Jewish, and other Jewish investors that underbid the Oracle. The question is, you really aren't, you really aren't bid↗

5:50:22@warsawerikbecause at the end of the day, you're the best bid overall. I've had many deals where I've bought a property, I wasn't the highest bidder, but I had other terms. The question The next,↗

5:50:32Ian MalcolmMitch, Mitch, Mitch, Mitch, here's the next question, 'cause you're gonna wanna try to railroad away from that one. So, Mitch, you just suggested in this space not too long ago, "Why don't you just go build your own software company? Why don't you build your own media empire?" Do you see the problem with that logic, given what happened with TikTok?↗

5:50:49@warsawerikNo. Everybody can build whatever they want in America.↗

5:50:52Ian MalcolmBut what happened when the Chinese built a social media platform that was more popular than the nonsense that's made by the Jews in America?↗

5:51:00@warsawerikA foreign company isn't going to be allowed to have dominance over Americans' population.↗

5:51:05Ian MalcolmThat's↗

5:51:05@warsawerikan American government that Ben Laden and Israel don't have. But you and Malcolm can go build whatever you want, and you're an American. Apparently I can't, 'cause if I build↗

5:51:13Ian MalcolmTikTok, it's gonna be taken away from me by- Oh, apparently I↗

5:51:19@warsawerikcan't. Because if I build TikTok, it's gonna be taken away from me by- Very much so, wait, wait, wait. Ben Laden and Israel. Exactly. So wait, Lou, before we call past it, what were Concessions to the↗

5:51:31Speaker 23government for revenue.↗

5:51:33@warsawerikWhatever, I'm asking you, do you know the other terms? That one of the concessions↗

5:51:37Ian Malcolmto Israel and yeah,↗

5:51:38Speaker 23he didn't kiss the wall. If there↗

5:51:39Ian Malcolmis, tell me what they are,↗

5:51:41@warsawerikif you're gonna make a connection. could it↗

5:51:42Ian Malcolmbe, Mitch, could it be something like Benjamin Netanyahu on air? I think it was the day or the day after this deal closed, suggesting we got TikTok. Do you think that might have to do anything with his, what is it, the fifth generation warfare that he talks about fighting on social Kim talking, with, with, Greenblatt about controlling the social media algorithms. Do you think that that might have had anything to do with the outcome of this bidding process?↗

5:52:10@warsawerikWe won, we won, I'm happy we won, I don't got any complaints about it.↗

5:52:14Ian MalcolmWait, wait, wait, wait, okay, okay, so this is the problem. So now you're happy that we won? Did I hear that correctly? I'm always↗

5:52:19@warsawerikhappy to win, always happy to win.↗

5:52:21Ian MalcolmOkay, okay, so here's what just happened for anybody who's not paying attention. So the, the Jewish Mitch suggests that, oh, I don't know, the Jewish, supremacy is a conspiracy theory that has no basis. He then says, "If you don't like↗

5:52:40Ian MalcolmBut that clearly didn't work out, because the politicians, largely funded by Jews, forced the sale of it to Jews at a rate that apparently was forty or forty-five percent the value that was offered by other groups. A purchase that was then celebrated by Netanyahu saying basically, "Jews in Israel got TikTok, woohoo! Now we just gotta talk to Elon, he's a good friend of Israel and the Jewish people." Says Benjamin Netanyahu, "Oh, I don't got choice." And so then what do we got? What do we have as the verdict and the outcome of walking Mitch through this exercise, where you would think he would look around the room and he would say, "You know what? Maybe Jews do have too much power over social media. Maybe they are using that power to weaponize it against the psychologies of the masses, which he himself, Mitch, said obviously social media can do. It could be weaponized against the people." So he recognizes that. Walk him through how it's now basically all monopolized by the same set of interests and what is the outcome? He says, "Well, good for us. It's, it's good when we win. I like when we win." So bitch, if you admit now that you, quote unquote, won That you also control TikTok in addition to Facebook and Instagram and Google and Netflix and Oracle and on and on and on. If you said, "I like when we win," will you now admit that Jews keep winning and therefore admit that Jewish supremacy isn't a conspiracy theory, but that is obviously true and is something that you celebrate?↗

5:54:22Speaker 20Come on, Mitch. Alright, so I just want to point out the reason why. Here we go. Here↗

5:54:28@warsawerikwe go.↗

5:54:29Speaker 20Okay, the reason why that this TikTok sale even took place was because the ADL put pressure on the government to get TikTok US sold. You know why? Because they were running metrics. Because Jonathan Greenblatt admitted in a video I've played many times that they track engagement. So I asked the question. Just a second, let me finish. Let me finish the question. Why did Mr. Beast hide?↗

5:54:49Speaker 20Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, just a question, just a second. They surveil, they surveil all of the social media platforms and again, track their data, and what they determined from TikTok is over ninety percent of the messaging is anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian, so they have a TikTok problem. He literally said we have a TikTok problem. It's also Benjamin Netanyahu who said that both TikTok and X are a problem because there's, I guess a little too much freedom of speech there, and people are- Allowed to tell the truth, and the fact they wanna target the Gen Zs who spent a lot of time on X, and also TikTok, of course. So they wanted to take it over so this way they can control the algo and prevent people from telling the truth about Israel and the crimes of the Jews. And as you go now on TikTok, Larry Ellison's got control of, of, of the TikTok algo now, you can't even put in or try to search information about how his group, his, the Oracle group, has, and well, ByteDance or whatever, has taken over↗

5:55:47Speaker 20You know what's really interesting to me is that Larry Ellison has no problem paying big multiples for certain companies, like, I don't know, Free Press, which, Barry Weiss owned, and all she has is a freaking, what, a, a little, what's she called? she's got her little journalism company that was, that was making ten million dollars a year. He paid two hundred million. He paid a twenty x for some shitty one-man show company. Why would he do that? But then pay like less than one x for the TikTok acquisition. That makes absolutely↗

5:56:18Speaker 20He then, of course it does. He didn't get the lowest price he can for Barry White Company, why'd he pay twenty X? And then he installs her as a CBS editor, no, but in this case, he's still paying her a salary to go and be the chief editor at CBS News, where she's getting all these big interviews now. Why, well, you're telling me there's no nepotism? So I asked the question. She's one of the most unqualified people there. And so not only, hold on, not only is this Jews controlling or taking over TikTok I mean, there was a separate conversation when we got into the disproportionate number of Jews that control the media, but now it's just so brazen in your face, it's not even- Jews don't own CNN,↗

5:56:56@warsawerikthat's owned by Warner Brothers, which is a public company. Oh yeah, it's not public, yeah, sure. Who runs Warner Brothers,↗

5:57:00Ian MalcolmMitch?↗

5:57:02@warsawerikDoesn't matter who runs it, who owns it. Oh, it doesn't matter who runs it or, or you wanna go to owns,↗

5:57:06Ian Malcolmwe can look at who owns it, but who runs it? Is it a Hezbollah guy or a↗

5:57:09@warsawerikMossad guy? I know he's↗

5:57:15Ian MalcolmJewish, but I don't know who the name↗

5:57:19@warsawerikis. Hey, hey No, it's Dippie, the chairman is Dippiazza, which isn't Jewish. So wrong again.↗

5:57:27Ian Malcolmno, actually, we're, we're not wrong on this one. I'm gonna get it for you in just a moment, but, Mitch, who do you think is currently bidding for Warner Brothers?↗

5:57:33@warsawerikAnd the other co-chair, Amaretta's, is Malone, I think something Malone, not Jewish either, but there is, I think the CEO is Jewish, but the chairman of the board, something Dippiazza, isn't Jewish.↗

5:57:45Ian MalcolmYou↗

5:57:45@warsawerikjust said the CEO is what↗

5:57:51Speaker 23Okay, it's David Zaslav. Stop fucking around, dude. It's David Zaslav. No, I think he's the CEO of Warner Brothers, man. Don't fuck with us. Right. Brian Roberts, head of podcast, by the way, a Jew. I said the chairman of↗

5:58:01@warsawerikthe↗

5:58:02Speaker 23board, David Zaslav. Chairman of the board, Rudolph. Rupert Murdoch, the head of Fox, his mother is Anne Green, a Jew. Just named three media companies right now. You wanna, you wanna↗

5:58:13@warsawerikkeep going? Are you saying,↗

5:58:18Speaker 23Nick, is lying? Wow, unbelievable. I just find six hundred↗

5:58:21@warsawerikpeople here. I just named↗

5:58:24Speaker 23a bunch of Jews around the company. You're saying that that's not exactly the way my mind works. What is the↗

5:58:28@warsawerikethnic, what↗

5:58:29Ian Malcolmis the, why the Jew? What is the ethnicity of David Zaslav? I just told you he's↗

5:58:33@warsawerikJewish. Yes, he is Jewish. Now,↗

5:58:36Ian Malcolmwhat is his title? CEO, I think. no, he's the president and the CEO of Warner Brothers. I'm sorry, the president and CEO, but who's the chairman? Pause. You just suggested a moment ago that there's no Jewish leadership at Warner Brothers. That was your suggestion. Do you wanna guess what two groups are currently looking to acquire Warner Brothers? Like, is it owned by-↗

5:59:02@warsawerikThat's not what I said. I said chairman of the board isn't Jewish, and it's not owned by Jews. It is owned as a public company that has diverse ownership. That's right.↗

5:59:12Ian MalcolmMitch, okay, so, so we just admit that the president, no, you can't go back, no, you're trying to dodge and deflect the chairman of the- No, it's important. The president and CEO of the company is a Jew at Warner Brothers. Now we can go to the sub-companies that sit underneath Warner Brothers. We're gonna find the same thing. If we look at the two companies that are competing over the ownership of Warner Brothers, who do you think that that is, Mitch? What two groups? Can you name them?↗

5:59:42@warsawerikNo,↗

5:59:43Ian Malcolmstop. That's unbelievable. Mitch, what two companies are trying to acquire Warner Brothers right now?↗

5:59:51Speaker 20I don't know off the top of my head.↗

5:59:53Ian MalcolmYou don't? Still don't answer the question. Who's the chairman of the board? Okay. Okay, okay. So we're gonna talk about media, but you don't know very basic answers. Now, if you look this up- Who?↗

6:00:00Speaker 27is the chairman of the board? Is he- Mitch, it's↗

6:00:02Ian Malcolmunbelievable. Now, the two companies that are looking to buy Warner Brothers are Skydance, which is owned by David Ellison, who we're just talking about, 'cause his father bought TikTok. They also just bought Paramount. Now they're going for Warner Brothers. If it doesn't go to them, it's gonna go to Netflix. Now, who founded and runs Netflix as well? Is it also Jews? What is David Ellison again? I think he must be that religion I couldn't pronounce, the Zorhanism or whatever. Oh no, that's right, he's a Jew. Also, he's not a Jedi, he's not a Sith, he's a Jew. So the top of Warner Brothers presently, the top of Paramount before it was bought by Skydance, which Skydance is run by a Jew, Paramount was run by a Jew, Warner Brothers is run by a Jew. Does this ever get tiring for you to keep lying?↗

6:00:53Speaker 27You're still gonna pretend that the-↗

6:01:01Speaker 27Double mute for the win. He mutes all the time, it's impossible to deal here. Oh my God. Oh my God. Thank you, and then everybody at home, we↗

6:01:10Speaker 28are thankful. All right, all right, let the guy fucking talk.↗

6:01:14Speaker 27I think this is gonna be five more minutes and then they're gonna get sick of you, Mitch. First ownership of many, many shareholders. Pretending Netflix is Jewish is silly, just 'cause you can find a Jew on a board or an executive position. Who↗

6:01:26Ian Malcolmfounded and ran Netflix? Who was literally the founder of Netflix?↗

6:01:31Speaker 27Think Reed Hastings. Reed Hastings, no, and, right or wrong.↗

6:01:34Ian MalcolmAnd, keep coming, Mitch. Who's the founder? Why don't we go deep into this one for you? So, who wrote the book Propaganda, Mitch?↗

6:01:44Speaker 27No, just answer the first one. No, no, no, we'll get there. Mark Randolph?↗

6:01:47Ian MalcolmWho's Mark Randolph? Yes, Mark Randolph, he's the founder of Netflix. He is Jewish. Now, who wrote the book Propaganda, which is all about propagandizing the masses?↗

6:02:00Ian MalcolmI don't know. Tell me. That Edward Bernays. Do you wanna guess who- Oh, right, correct. Edward Bernays. Do you wanna guess who he↗

6:02:07Speaker 27is in the lineage with? Do↗

6:02:08Ian Malcolmyou wanna take a guess? I↗

6:02:10Speaker 27think it's part of Freud's family, right?↗

6:02:11Ian MalcolmYes! Okay, so Mitch, so do you find it weird that the father of psychoanalysis, the↗

6:02:17Speaker 28pedophile, the homosexual, who is Sigmund Freud, right, Mitch, also the father of psychoanalysis, who pitches things such as, hold on, who pitches things such as the "Oedipus complex," or with "penis envy"? Yeah, that's the kind of stuff that your people preach.↗

6:02:31Ian MalcolmSo, so "penis envy pedophile," you're a forty-two,↗

6:02:35Speaker 28but don't you↗

6:02:35Speaker 27understand the fallacy of your↗

6:02:39Speaker 27Any other person capable of buying Netflix, creating Netflix, go buy it. But,↗

6:02:45Ian MalcolmMitch,↗

6:02:45Speaker 27what's your complaint?↗

6:02:46Ian MalcolmYour complaint, so your suggestion is because a group of people that perhaps control things like the Federal Reserve, it can just print money out of thin air, can buy anything and everything and then pervert it for their purposes, while you are acknowledging their disproportionate ownership of these things, while you are suggesting that social media platforms can be weaponized against the people? While you are admitting that those social media companies are disproportionately, if almost entirely, run by Jews as is the media, but you are still going to push back and suggest that Jews aren't overrepresented in the media and that Jews aren't currently in charge of almost the entirety of those empires, is that right?↗

6:03:30Speaker 27Oh, definitely, they're not overrepresented in the media. They're definitely not even overrepresented. Writers, of course not. Oh, of course not. If you look,↗

6:03:37Ian MalcolmMidge,↗

6:03:38Speaker 27once again, Midge, I↗

6:03:39Ian Malcolmwill ask you the same question I asked the other Jew. Can you define the word overrepresentation?↗

6:03:46Speaker 27I don't judge representation.↗

6:03:47Ian MalcolmCan you define the word, Midge?↗

6:03:55Ian MalcolmMitch, come on, can you define the word overrepresentation? You keep muting me. You're not muted. You're not muted.↗

6:04:01Speaker 27If I'm silent, I'm muted, man.↗

6:04:03Ian MalcolmNo,↗

6:04:03Speaker 27you're not. Overrepresentation to me is Representation that is, unjustified.↗

6:04:11Ian MalcolmNo, it's not unjustified, Mitch. That is not the definition of the word, the word, Mitch. It's your subjective definition. That's how I put it. No, no, no, no, no, Mitch. This is the very problem that we had with the other Jew, who earlier said overrepresentation is when something isn't as much or as little as it should be. It's too much for me. That's not the word. I don't understand. You're not an idiot, Mitch. Overrepresentation is essentially a mathematical, let's say, concept. It is one that is clearly definable. It's not something that's good or bad, it's something that is Now, why is it that both you and the other Jew that I asked to define a simple word are trying to apply emotion to that word rather than just being able to define it as a logical concept? Is this a Jewish thing, Mitch?↗

6:05:14Speaker 27I'll read the definition. Please do. Overrepresentation means a group present in a sample statistical category at a much higher proportion than justified based upon actual numbers in the overall population. Okay. Now, Mitch, it's about whether it's justified. No, no, no, there's no, no, no,↗

6:05:29Ian Malcolmnothing wrong. There's no, no, you have a piece of to be overrepresented if that is justifiable or if it feels good. It is the sample size of something relative to its population size. Blacks are overrepresented in the NBA by about 4.5x Now, ironically, it is the owners' box that is about thirty-seven X overrepresented by Jews. Do you know why that is? Because almost three-quarters of all those teams are owned by Jews, despite being two percent of the population. That is overrepresentation. That's not a statement on whether that's good or bad or right or wrong, it just is what it is. There aren't a lot of midgets in the NBA. They are underrepresented on the court. That is how you would define these things, because there's probably, I don't know, one in five hundred people. Maybe they're midgets. I don't actually know the math on that one. But let's just say they're one in five hundred. Let's say there's five hundred people in the NBA. Representation would mean, if it was an even distribution, there would be one midget amongst the five hundred players. There's not. They're underrepresented. Blacks are thirteen percent of the country, seventy plus percent of the players. That is an overrepresentation. Not good or bad,↗

6:06:50Ian MalcolmJews seem to struggle and want to apply emotion to logical concepts. I can't have a conversation with you about a logical thing if you apply emotion to it. What color is this wall, Mitch? Well, I'd like it if it was blue. That's not the question. What color is it? Oh, it's gray, or it's white, or it's black, or it's something. Not how do you feel about that. Not does it make you sad. Not 'does it offend you because you can't say anything bad about Jews?'. It is what it is. To be overrepresented is to have more of something than you would if it was a normalized distribution. You cannot, in good faith, say that the media isn't overrepresented by Jews. That's an absolute abject lie. And why do we know that? Because you mentioned the one group that is Skydance, that owns Paramount, that might buy Warner Brothers, which just between those three would be almost a third of all the media in the hands of a company that is run and owned by a Jew, which if it was proper representation would own two percent of the media 'cause they're two percent of the population. Instead, they almost own all of it. So when you say that they're not overrepresented, this isn't about the definition. You don't get to redefine what a word means because it makes you feel better. They're overrepresented. Just like Karl Marx is descendant from Jewish lineage. These are just the things you don't get to say, "I don't like that one. That might mean-- That's critical of Jews, so therefore it can't be true. So now I'm gonna redefine the word."↗

6:08:28Ian MalcolmIt's not a genocide in Palestine because, well, look, we redefined genocide. Now it has to be three hundred thousand, because it's not-- oh, if it was sixty thousand, seventy thousand, some article saying six hundred thousand, no, we'll just redefine the word. Genocide can only be a million people or more. Yay, we won, we didn't do a genocide. This is insane. This is poll-poll. This is why it's infuriating to debate subjects with Jews. Where they can't be sincere, they can't be reasonable, because they're redefining words as you go along the journey. People get really tired of it.↗

6:09:05Ian MalcolmBut then again, we can't talk about expulsions and all those things, because you'll just say, "Well, what is an expulsion? That isn't what happened. It was actually, it was a forced ejection, but we're not gonna label that an expulsion, 'cause then we'd have to admit the Jews were expelled from things." It's infuriating, Mitch.↗

6:09:21Speaker 27The only one being emotional here is you, man.↗

6:09:23Ian MalcolmYeah, let's be clear. And you're gaslighting everybody because you can't define basic words, Mitch.↗

6:09:32Speaker 27I'll use your NBA example. You were saying that blacks are overrepresented in the players, and that's not a sufficient definition. I'm not saying why, why. I'm not saying that, that↗

6:09:43Ian Malcolmis what it is. That is a fact that blacks are overrepresented in the NBA.↗

6:09:48Speaker 27But it is a distorted statement, and I'll explain why I say that. Why is it a distorted↗

6:09:51Ian Malcolmstatement if it's true, Mitch? I'll get to it. I'll get↗

6:09:55Speaker 27to it. Why? Because you have to look at the population of those who are a certain height, who dedicate themselves to playing, and are they overrepresented in that population? Are they overrepresented in that population? The answer is no. Wait, wait, wait. Just because there aren't x number of millions in the NBA? Not, no, no, you have to look at the population of people that are a certain height that can be capable of being in the league. Correct, correct. What percent of the people over seven feet tall? The population that grow up, the people that, the people that grow up practicing basketball, the people that have the capability. Capable. So You could have a population of people who are white in America, for example, that don't even care about basketball. They're irrelevant to the statistic. You're including them, and that creates a gross distortion to the statistic.↗

6:10:40Ian MalcolmNo. In the same way,↗

6:10:41Speaker 27you're, you're↗

6:10:43Ian Malcolmactually-- Hang on, pause. Mitch is actually going to suggest that black people aren't overrepresented in the NBA. That is his actual suggest, suggest- They are↗

6:10:51Speaker 27representative of the population that are interested in the NBA. No, no, they↗

6:10:54Ian Malcolmaren't. Not even close. Thirteen percent of the population make- Making up seven out of ten of the basketball players, that is a drastic overrepresentation. And if anybody doesn't believe me, go ask Grok or any AI engine right now. Are blacks overrepresented in the NBA? It will tell you absolutely. Unless you are just lying or you're incompetent, I don't know which one it is, but it is infuriating. It is gaslighting. It is literally me saying, "What color is the wall?" And you're saying, "It's a cloud." No, it's not. It's a color. Define the color. Why is this so difficult for you?↗

6:11:32Ian MalcolmThe issue is, is the why.↗

6:11:34Speaker 27Is↗

6:11:34Ian Malcolmit a justified rep- There is no- Why? It has nothing to do with whether or not something is overrepresented. This is utterly insane. Of course it doesn't. The why is↗

6:11:44Speaker 27the most- Why? You ignored the most important part of the question, the why.↗

6:11:50Ian MalcolmMitch, this is unbelievable. What is two plus two, Mitch?↗

6:11:57Ian MalcolmFour. That's a relevant question. 2 plus 2 is 4. Why can you address, let's ask the why, then. But that's irrelevant to the question. The why is 2 plus 2 is 4, Mitch. I'm not even gonna hit the mute button anymore. Just talk through it, human behavior.↗

6:12:09Speaker 27Human behavior and the actions of people in life is not a two plus two.↗

6:12:14Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, no, no. I asked you, why is 2 plus 2 4, Mitch? Because numbers are simple. because- Numbers are simple, words are simple, Mitch. Why are they difficult for you? Why do you have to redefine words literally in a conversation? And society↗

6:12:28Speaker 27isn't not a two plus two equals four. but↗

6:12:31Ian Malcolmwords like overrepresentation are simple, unless you're a disingenuous liar and you're trying to pervert the meaning of words to fit your narrative, which is bullshit, Mitch. That's why nobody cares what you suggest, that's why they come to these bases, because we're able to call things out like that, very directly. So stop lying, stop- Gaslighting, overrepresentation has nothing to do with the justification or lack thereof of something. It is what it is, and you're trying to deflect from that so that you can have this perverted view that Jews aren't overrepresented in the media because dot dot dot, let me justify it. That's not what the word means, and it's not difficult to call you out on that. You do it in every space. It's unbelievable. This will make for a wonderful video, by the way.↗

6:13:20Speaker 27You love clipping me, it's your favorite thing.↗

6:13:22Ian MalcolmNo, I, I, I, yes, because you, you make quite the, embarrassment out of yourself, that's true.↗

6:13:32Speaker 27See, the idea that any cohort should be a percentage of the population that they are is a re- is unreasonable. A, because first of all, you take the reporters, the writers, everybody who's in the media? No, they're not disproportionate. But in terms of who is interested going into the media, the people, is it competitive? Can people choose to build their own media company, to acquire any company they want? Of course they can. So you're like taking a fact that is true, there's many Jewish owners or CEOs in media, but that isn't the fact that people are interested in. Why aren't you building a media company? Why isn't that our friend here, Mithun, building a media company? Mithun, I'm gonna ask↗

6:14:07Ian Malcolmyou a question. What definition did you use to arrive at your proposed claim as to the meaning of the word overrepresentation? Where did you pull that definition?↗

6:14:21Ian MalcolmSay that again?↗

6:14:26Ian MalcolmHolocaust encyclopedia. Where did you pull your definition that you read on a recorded line? Where did you read your definition? Googled it. Can you speak up? I just said I googled it. You googled it, okay, so you're gonna tell me that you googled the word overrepresentation, the AI spat out that it has to do with the justified representation. I think that was the word that you used. Again, it's a recorded line. Is that your suggestion?↗

6:14:54Speaker 27I put in overrepresentation definition. Did you↗

6:14:56Ian Malcolmadd the word justified when you read off the definition of overrepresentation?↗

6:15:02Speaker 27No,↗

6:15:02Ian Malcolmno, you didn't. So if I go and I look on Google for the word overrepresentation, you're gonna suggest that it's gonna say justified there. You do that. Did↗

6:15:09@uncutspeechyou catch that vocal intonation there, Ian? I↗

6:15:12Ian Malcolmdid. No,↗

6:15:13Speaker 28I didn't. I didn't. Vocal intonation? So let's get back to the↗

6:15:17Ian Malcolmissue. No, let's not get back to the issue, Mitch. I'm guessing that you used Google for overrepresentation, is that right? Maybe↗

6:15:23Speaker 27we use you with the JQ and call you Cousin Kretchie. No, hang on, Mitch, you're saying that you used↗

6:15:27Ian MalcolmGoogle. I just wanna confirm that one more time on the record. Come on, Cousin,↗

6:15:30Speaker 27let's just↗

6:15:30Ian Malcolmcontinue↗

6:15:31Speaker 27with the top↗

6:15:34Ian Malcolmline. No, we're not gonna continue with the top line. Come on, let's go back to the beginning. You got caught,↗

6:15:45Speaker 27Nothing goes poorly for me, man. Life remains↗

6:15:47Ian Malcolmgood. Well, those who don't have shame and never feel it.↗

6:15:52Speaker 27Oh, yeah, God. Yeah, nigga. Exactly.↗

6:15:58@joann_marieAnd, and we'll, we'll, we'll, we'll,↗

6:16:00Speaker 27we'll, we'll give you a little news for the real quick. can, can↗

6:16:02@joann_marieyou reset him? But in terms of the media,↗

6:16:04Speaker 27what percentage of the people in the media are Jewish?↗

6:16:08Ian MalcolmMitch,↗

6:16:08Speaker 27what are you taking into account? The whole people and all the various media, what percentage is Jewish?↗

6:16:13Ian Malcolmin top of the media, we can go to almost every one of the major media companies.↗

6:16:16Speaker 27I can see the top↗

6:16:16Ian Malcolmof the↗

6:16:16Speaker 27media, all aspects of media, reporters, every aspect of media. If you wanna look, you wanna look↗

6:16:21Ian Malcolmat the major news outlets, you wanna look at the anchors, you wanna look at the actors, yes, there's a drastic overrepresentation of Jews.↗

6:16:28Speaker 27What's the percentage?↗

6:16:29Ian MalcolmI have no idea.↗

6:16:31Speaker 27Oh, you have a number. Turn on the number. And then I see two people, this is very frustrating for me to say things that I don't know how to do. I see, wait, Mitch, how could you say something in your answer? There's an easy, there's an easy answer here, right? You can't say I don't know. You're the guy who thinks they always know. So, okay, but, but Mitch, look, here,↗

6:16:47Speaker 29here, I've got, I've got an answer for you. Over two percent, there.↗

6:16:53Speaker 27So? But that's not the-- That's not sufficient. You know, Mitch, that isn't sufficient.↗

6:16:57@uncutspeechThat's insufficient. That's insufficient. That's insufficient.↗