Celebrities Killed For Jewish Supremacy

4:31Ian MalcolmAlright, Miss Joanne. So as we often do, why don't we start the conversation here, by seeing if you can identify? So why, why is name that tune, appropriate for the song we're just, just listening to? Any, any thoughts or considerations for anybody listening, feel free to put into the purple pill why you think I might have selected that little tune. First off, Joanne, do you know-- can you recognize that song?↗

5:05@joann_marieYes, of course, it's Sting.↗

5:07Ian MalcolmBut I- Haha.↗

5:09@joann_marieOkay. I'm so bad at this game, Ian. Like, I'm seriously the worst one. I have no idea why you chose that. No. I, I also don't know the lyrics, so, so that's also on me.↗

5:19Ian MalcolmOkay, well, so we've got Sting, the song is Shape of My Heart. now, given the title of the space, and, we'll just give some hints here as we go along. Well, actually, before we do, Mr. Walsh, any thoughts on why we might have played that↗

5:42Ian MalcolmI don't know, man, I can't tell ya. Alright, fair enough. Any, let's see, in the purple pill, did anybody connect the dots? We've got some various posts, nobody so far. Okay. Well then, so Shape of My Heart by Sting. So, well, Joanne, what are we gonna be talking about in this space? What, what's the theme here that we're gonna go over, Mr. Sam Parker?↗

6:05@joann_marieIt's all of the celebrities that have been killed by Jewish supremacy.↗

6:10Ian MalcolmAha, okay. And so the killer of somebody might be known. What are some other terminology that we would throw in there?↗

6:25Ian MalcolmWalsh, any thoughts? What are, what's some other, terms that you'd use for somebody that is going out and killing somebody?↗

6:33@joann_marieI'll say hunting.↗

6:34Ian MalcolmHunting? That could be one. let's, let's think a little bit more as a, well, actually, here's a hint, as a professional, somebody that goes out as a professional and kills somebody, what would they be called?↗

6:51Ian MalcolmIt's that one movie you hire people for.↗

6:53@joann_marieHitman.↗

6:54Ian Malcolmwe're getting closer. Okay, so it is a movie about a hitman. And, and that individual is a, well, the movie is actually called The Professional, or actually, I think in Europe it's Leon the Professional, one or the other. Joanne, are you familiar with the film?↗

7:12@joann_marieI am, with Natalie Portman as well, and she was a child.↗

7:15Ian MalcolmThat's exactly correct. So Leon Neon The Professional, a movie about a assassin, a hitman, that being the theme, song to that movie, I don't, theme's maybe the wrong word, but made famous in that, that film. So what we will be doing is, we're gonna be covering and, and we're probably gonna have Sam join us in about fifteen minutes or so, and when he does, we're gonna walk through a wide bevy of individuals, including celebrities, of course, some politicians that will be thrown into the mix, we'll be unpacking each And maybe what we could do actually, Joanne, it's an interesting little segue here, there is an interesting space that I know that, that you had helped to set up and that we have in motion, which actually might involve a Jewish killer,↗

8:05Ian Malcolmthrough a, a connection that you've made. And so perhaps we could actually start the space in Sam's absence, with that first person, and, and maybe we could kick that off in just a moment. But before we do, Mr. Walsh, just wanna- Welcome you up here and, and see if there's anything else that you'd wanna add to the agenda here before we kinda kick off some of the conversation.↗

8:26Ian MalcolmI got nothing, man. I'm here, I'm here. Ready to rock. Okay. Alright, ready to rock and here for the party. and so, Joann, just actually before we even go into that, I, I think there's obviously been a lot of commotion the last twenty-four, forty-eight, seventy-two hours. Anything that is top of mind before we start kinda diving into this subject?↗

8:46@joann_marieNo, it's, it's all good. I, I haven't seen any of the commotion because I was working. So, what has happened today?↗

8:54Ian MalcolmOh, what has happened? You know, there's just endless things on, on this application. serial killer, somebody said in the purple pill. no, well, we're gonna, we're gonna be perhaps talking about serial killers. we've got a, a wide variety that we're gonna cover with, with Sam when he arrives. But no, the, the, you know, the as fast and furious as anything these days, and then you've got kind of two flavors of it. You've got things that are taking place in the, let's call it the real world, political front, and whether it's tensions in the Middle East or the insanity of politics, you've of course got Thomas Massie, who, it looks like they're going to really throw a wrench into his election cycle. They're throwing some mud on him reputationally, and gonna see if they can't unseat him and- I mean, it's very curious, if, if Thomas Massey, who I think is probably one of the most visible and most viable,↗

9:53Ian Malcolmmainstream politicians, and, and when I say mainstream, obviously he's far outside of the sphere, perhaps of Donald Trump or of JD Vance, but, you know, th-this is a person that most individuals have at least heard about, they're somewhat familiar with the name, similar to like Marjorie Taylor Greene, but if, in fact, Thomas Massey does get, let's say voted out of office, it'll be a huge thorn in the side for, I think what we're trying to construct here. he's one of the few people that not only genuinely seems to be willing to talk about some of these subjects, this is a person who put forward legislation to end the Federal Reserve, right? He's actually, he was the, the primary, I don't want to say culprit, but he was the primary charger in, releasing the Epstein files, right? This, this is a guy who's actually doing things for the American people, Into his background, and there are some, certainly, t-there's some Jewish money that is behind him, but it's not in the form of APAC, and certainly seems far better than most. And so, you know, I, I, I would hope that he's gonna be able to stay in that chair. We've gotta keep an eye on that election, obviously, is of critical importance, but that, that's certainly one big thing that's going on, Joanne. Any, any thoughts on that?↗

11:09@joann_marieYeah, I, I saw. And it's, it's they do it right when, when, when the elections are about to happen, right? And it's just, I don't know, I'm, I saw the polling market thing that apparently he dropped a lot, and that isn't a good indicator, but I hope, I hope people realize and it goes up again and- That it's, I know, it's, it's just exhausting, and they always have these tricks up their lea- sleeves, right? And,↗

11:43@joann_marieyeah, I don't know. I, I hope people don't fall for it, and, and he actually does win.↗

11:47Ian MalcolmNo, they certainly do. And I'll tell-- Something that, and, and this goes well down a conspiracy, rabbit hole, which I, I always love just jumping into headfirst, even when I haven't fully thought them through, which is on the polly market piece. Obviously, that is at And one of the usual suspects, and I actually, I find that incredibly dangerous because what they're basically doing, all of these markets are rife with, with corruption. We've obviously seen all of the,↗

12:20Ian Malcolmyou can't even call them wagers, right? They are basically buying into options that, in many cases, it seems like these politicians have inside, information on. They're using that to then wager on things. They're using those wagers to make endless amounts of money. And that's obviously one side of this just horribly corrupt system. On the other side, there's part of me that wonders if this is going to be a new way that they're going to try and social signal things that they want to the masses and, and a way to essentially demoralize people or demotivate them. And I say that because we know with absolute clarity that, for example, the mainstream media, they have in the past meddled with polls to try and- Get people to basically stay home and to skip the vote, and this was very prominent with the Hillary Clinton campaign, where I'm sure some people remember the, the elect-- the election tracker the day of, and they basically had the odds of, victory on the Hillary Clinton side, and it started the day with Clinton at like ninety-eight percent and throughout the day just whittled its way all the way down, and as it went down, obviously Donald Trump came up and vice versa. And so I say this because the media in that instance was clearly trying to push that out as a way, again, to propagandize the masses so that the people that perhaps were gonna vote for Hillary would be more excited to do so, to go out and to pull that lever, 'cause after all, I'm gonna vote for the winning team, and vice versa for those that thought their candidate had no chance. Well, it's raining outside, so why bother? Right? And I say that because with Polymarket, well, these polls can be rigged Just as easily as the mainstream media, right? All it takes is just an endless pool of money to be able to throw what you know might be a loss onto a side to basically buy that demoralizing visualization, and we know that the usual suspects Well, they're not exactly lacking on the financial front, right? They'll just print more money, put it in their pockets, and then just say, "Oh, well, we'll, we'll cough it up," right? It's actually no different if you think about it this way. How much money would be, would have to be put onto a massive loss to drag down what appear to be the odds and artificially set those in motion? Well, it's probably not gonna be more money than it would cost to run a ten or a twenty million dollar advertising campaign to try and, let's say, Right? So this is the weird thing is that we now live in this day and era where to try and understand what is real requires us to first understand that things that can be bought are easily purchased by those people that have all of the power, right? And so it's all very, very curious. But, but the Thomas Massey piece certainly, it, it is-- I, I hope that he wins. I, I think he's got lots of, again, chinks in the armor that we can point to, but nonetheless, he is out of the options available He is by far the most prominent, he's the most viable, and he seems like the most sincere, is probably the right term. again, there are, there are holes in that armor that we could point at. But with that being said, so to shift gears from the present into the past, again, we've got this idea of, individuals that perhaps lost their life at the end of either a bullet, of a sword, or of all kinds of other weapons that we're gonna be talking about today in the space. and so Joanne, with that, do you wanna kinda kick us off and give a teaser trailer to one of the spaces that I hope that we're gonna be having for next week, in which we will perhaps unpack in much greater detail some of the backstory and the, let's say, the tools that we would use to try and understand the accuracy of the allegation or accusation that you might be, might be levelling here on our first, what could be defined as a Jewish assassin?↗

16:16@joann_marieYeah, I mean, we still don't know who the actual killer of Kurt Cobain was, but he was surrounded by a lot of, of very shady people. So, we will interview the private investigator from that case, and he will show What he has been looking into and it's, it's just, it's pretty crazy because it is, like, I didn't know how surround, like, his entire surrounding was just↗

16:48@joann_marielike operatives and it's, it's pretty crazy, but I can't wait for that space and, and I'm really happy to be here. And also, guys, please repost this space and follow Ian and our amazing, amazing speakers. And, if you guys go to it, I will also repost it and- I cannot wait. So we're gonna talk about, like, Michael Jackson, and Princess Diana, and who else? Tupac.↗

17:13Ian MalcolmOh, we've got.↗

17:14@joann_marieOh, don't forget↗

17:15Speaker 1Prince. Prince is also assassinated by.↗

17:19Ian MalcolmPrince?↗

17:20Speaker 1Yeah.↗

17:20Ian MalcolmWait a second, so Blue Sky, alright, so this is gonna be very interesting. We do have a roster, and Sam and I have been sending some messages back and forth throughout the last, two or three days with some of the people that we were gonna throw into the mix here. but Blue Sky, since, again, I, I, I think Sam is, he said probably around, the half hour mark, so he'll probably be joining us in the next couple minutes, but, while we wait, Prince, now it's curious↗

17:49Ian MalcolmAwards ceremony, maybe it was the Grammys, please correct me if I'm wrong. But I've, I've seen some of the, the vocab that he used talking about the media and things of that nature. Do you wanna kinda walk through Prince and we can throw him in as the second musician in this, little list of people that we're gonna talk about?↗

18:08Speaker 1Yeah, I was just talking to a friend of mine who was a very big fan of Prince. I mean, I listened to his music, purple, all kind of stuff, but I wasn't really into it. But somebody who's really, really, all this house, got all this purple stuff, friend of mine, she's very devoted, a fan, told me He said, "You have this feeling, this, I've been researching." He goes, "For last, before he died, he changed his tone about the jewelry, so he was saying some things,↗

18:45Speaker 1and suddenly, as soon as he start changing it, his views, poom, he's gone."↗

18:53Speaker 1Very interesting. I have no idea. So something we have to do more research, get more evidence, but it's really kind of thing everybody who start again, it's the Jews, something somehow, some way or some shape or form gets disappeared. If it's car accident, medical malpractice, fucking get shot, something happens because somehow he has a voice, he got followers, he somehow he has an influence.↗

19:26Speaker 1And as soon as they feel that you're not the team, elimination takes place.↗

19:34Speaker 1But some show form, I don't know. So it's something to think about it. Thank you.↗

19:39Ian MalcolmNo, of course. And, and, some backstory on the death of, of Prince, whose legal name was Prince Rogers Nelson, which is pretty, pretty curious name there, especially with the, children of Michael Jackson. now, it's worth noting That when Prince died, this was an individual didn't die of some kind of blunt trauma, no bullets, no clubs, none of that, but, certainly passed away as a result of some kind of chemicals. The thing that's curious about it is there was certainly fentanyl in his system.↗

20:13Ian Malcolmand, and this is actually off of, off of Grok, the, medical examiner's office said it was an accidental overdose from fentanyl, which would have been mixed in, but here's the curious part about it is that that fentanyl would have been, for one reason or another, included into the otherwise legal drugs that Prince was taking at the time, which is kind of curious on that. Now, for what it's worth, I, I have- I've seen some of these quotes in the past, but just to read some off, this is direct quotes, from Prince, not the King of Pop, but, this is his, little red Corvette, counterpart who said,↗

20:58Ian Malcolm"On records and the record labels, the record contracts are just like-- I'm gonna say the word, they're just like slavery. I tell any young artist, don't sign," he said. Another quote, "If you don't own- Your masters, your masters, well, they own you. He also said the music industry isn't run by musicians, it's run by money, and that's run not by us, refer-referencing to the musicians.↗

21:29Ian Malcolmso very, very curious. He also performed for what it's worth in the, let's see, what, what does this say in here? During the mid-1990s, while fighting with Warner Brothers, he appeared with a outfit, on stage with the words Slave written across him. and so very, very curious stuff there from, the one and only Prince. If people haven't seen it, go back and watch, his Super Bowl performance. It's probably one of the all-time greats. I believe that that was all done live, which cannot be said about most artists. but the man was certainly unbelievably talented, spoke rather critically about, let's say, the music industry, and as a result, could be the, the second person. So I- I wanna welcome Mr. Sam Parker. Very excited for this space and for the conversation. Sam, we just walked through to kinda kick things off, we talked a little bit about the state of the state of the day and Thomas Massey just to fire it up. we also played, and, Sam, are, are, are you a cinephile? I think is the term. Are you a big movie- I↗

22:33Speaker 2don't know, can you hear me?↗

22:34Ian MalcolmWe sure can.↗

22:36Speaker 2I, I do watch movies occasionally, I don't watch nearly as many anymore. I mean, once you sort of get, you know, blackpilled on Hollywood and entertainment, you know, you don't, you don't watch as much of it. I certainly don't watch as much as I used to. What's interesting is I actually grew up being a total television and movie junkie, because my parents are boomers, and, you know, they grew up Going to the movies, watching TV, my dad has told me many times how his family had the first color TV on the block, they were very proud of that. So that was passed on to me, I grew up, watching lots of TV, I grew up watching movies off of old film projectors, projected onto white sheets over the fireplace. Many of those, that's, that's super unc for, for you youngsters, right? Like old film projectors on the, the white sheet over the fireplace. But that's, you know, I grew up watching old Humphrey Bogart, all the Golden Era Hollywood stuff, and I took that into my adult life, but probably since about twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen and onward, I haven't gone to the movies nearly as much as I used to, and now it's slowed down to maybe, maybe I'll go to the theater once, maybe twice a year for something, and I haven't watched the Academy Awards since I believe either two thousand two or two thousand three. Even though I grew up watching them, so I'm, I'm a bit of a classic film snob, you know, anything pre-1970, maybe pre-1980, but↗

24:09Speaker 2You know, and, and then of course, I grew up in the '80s and '90s, so I watched a lot of those movies, but like nowadays, I, I don't really keep up with it. And, but I, I have seen this train wreck, Odyssey, Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey, this, this train wreck coming down the pike here. That looks like that's going to be, hopefully, a, a massive bomb, not a bomb, you know, just a total disaster. I hope it, I hope↗

24:34Speaker 2it↗

24:34Ian Malcolmfails and flops↗

24:42Speaker 2I mean, I, I, I saw the Indiana Jones, the fifth Indiana Jones movie, this, this last one. And that was a total disaster. I went and saw that out of curiosity several, weeks after it opened because family was going, and so I went with family to see it out of morbid curiosity, and it was terrible, and it lost money, and I hope all, all this nonsense just keeps losing money. I don't even, I don't even hope that, like, some people say, I hope that, you know, these movies lose money until the studios, you know, get their act together and figure out what Americans wanna watch. I, I don't even want the studios to recover. I, I want them to fail, and I want them to crash and burn. Of course, maybe for now Hollywood's too big to fail, and, you know, they can just print money, and honestly, their top goal is not Just to make money, but it's also to subvert us and demoralize us and destroy us. So they don't really care if they lose money on, on many of these projects. There's more money where that came from, right? So that's where I'm, I'm at with movies. I, you know, you can't turn on any sh- television show, any movie on any streaming service now, whether it's HBO Max, Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney, you know, whatever the hell they all are, you can't turn on one single show, one single movie where there's not race mixed, race mixed, leads or somebody who's a homo or trans or something. It's just, there is nothing traditional, nothing that's just pro-white, pro- American, pro-Christian, good content. and so even if I wanted, even, even if I wanted to watch movies and television, like, what is there for me to watch? That's, it's, it's like It's like putting a, a, a buffet of food out in front of me, but it's all laced with poison, and as soon as I bite into it, I'm gonna, I'm gonna throw up. And that's how I see the entertainment now. There isn't anything for, for somebody like me. I'm just disgusted by all of it. I can't watch any of it. You know, you see the-↗

26:51Speaker 2You can see the design and the intent behind most of it, and it's just foul, filthy, and disgusting, and I don't want any part of it. You know, even though I, at one point in time, was a total television junkie. I could tell you what I was watching when I was four years old and five years old. I could tell you my entire daily television schedule still to this day. It's pretty hilarious, but, I've almost completely renounced it now.↗

27:12Ian MalcolmNo, I can appreciate that. And, and perhaps, you mentioned '80s That we're doing. And so I started with, "Sting" and "Shape of My Heart," which, obviously was the, the closing song to the movie "Leon: The Professional." And isn't it curious because on this subject, not only is it about an assassin, but it also has not only a Jew, and Natalie Portman, but it is presented kind of curiously, and this is kind of the, the, grotesque nature of Hollywood, the American rendition of The film, I think the American one is called The Professional, and it features an assassin who of course kind of takes in this little girl, tries to protect her from the evils of the world, and they have a relationship that seems rather wholesome. the European version is laced in with some strange extra details that might make, perhaps that relationship a little bit sketchier, which kind of a little hint or an homage to Epstein or maybe Eyes Wide Shut that they threw in there. but nonetheless, involving Natalie Portman, who at one time of all people, of course, was dating one of the Rothschilds, because that's just, that's how Hollywood rolls. But, but Sam, it was interesting 'cause we went over, Joanne, who is to kinda kick things off. We talked about Prince, you might have heard a little bit of that, from Blue Sky, and some of the strange nature around his death, but also Joanne kinda kicked things off with, Kurt Cobain, because we're actually gonna Space with an individual who had a direct connection to what was essentially referred to, if I'm not mistaken, Joanne, correct me if I'm wrong, but it's kind of the deathbed confessionals essentially of one of the individuals that was pretty closely tied, to the case and some of the information there within.↗

29:08Speaker 2I didn't catch that, but, I, I don't know, did Joanne, is Joanne gonna summarize that for us now or what, Yeah. So, so Joanne, and, and↗

29:17Ian Malcolmit's kind of a teaser trailer 'cause we're gonna do a whole space on everything, including, a direct, you know, conversation with one of the people, intimately tied to it. But, Joanne, maybe it's a good way to, to again provide that little teaser trailer for anybody that wasn't here earlier.↗

29:32@joann_marieYeah. James, the, the private investigator for, that is looking into Kurt Cobain's death. Interviewed someone who was there, when, when apparently he was killed, and he had like a dead body confession. So it's, it's gonna be pretty crazy. And yeah, have you, have you looked into, Kurt Cobain's, because he was surrounded by all these insane people that- A little bit↗

30:00@joann_marieI'm actually from↗

30:00Speaker 3Washington State. The high school I believe that he went to growing up was in my high school sports league, but he was a little older than me, but I know a little bit about it. I'm not as well versed in the lore of his death as, as other people, so I'm actually looking forward to hearing some of the minutiae on, around that. But I am aware roughly of some of the, some of the allegations. And it's not surprising because what we're learning now, you know, especially with Biggie Smalls, you know-↗

30:29Speaker 3And Tupac, and Michael Jackson, and, and, you know, Marilyn Monroe, you know, John Lennon. It, it just, it seems that there's just a never-ending list of people getting whacked, you know, made to look like suicide. Now, that's not to say that everybody's a suicide, certainly there are many, many drug overdoses, and You know, there's a lot of excess in the music industry in Hollywood, but, but not all of it's excess. Some of it, that's the cover, right?↗

31:01@joann_marieJohn Lennon was also killed by, by George Supremacy?↗

31:07Speaker 3Well, he was assassinated.↗

31:08@joann_marieOh, no, I know, but I, I didn't, I thought it was just like a crazy fan. I didn't know it was like, an entire conspiracy. This is gonna be so exciting. Well,↗

31:18Speaker 3I, I'm not getting into John Lennon tonight. I, I haven't really done the homework on that one, so maybe somebody else has, Ian? you know, maybe some other speaker or somebody in the audience has done the work on that, or maybe you have. That's not one that I've had a chance to↗

31:36Speaker 3My list of things to do, but you never get to. So I'm not, I gotta plead ignorance on the John Lennon assassination. From what I hear, there's more to it. People have told me there's more to it than, than meets the eye, and of course, I would one hundred percent believe that, right? It's not hard to convince me that, that assassinate, that an assassination of a famous person like him, that, that there's more to it, right? Then, may, maybe there isn't, but if there is, I'm not gonna↗

32:06Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And, and with that, Sam, I know we've got kind of a, a floating roster, and some, some have been mentioned thus far, but we can kind of start jumping into each and every one of these. But before we do, since I, I know we've got Gentile and Mark that just popped up here and Blue Sky, any other names that the three of you would wanna throw in before we start unpacking some of those that Sam and I've been talking about in the background?↗

32:32Speaker 4Well, I'll just say John Lennon was killed by a deranged fan. I don't, you know, I-- and there was a long, very personal history there, and the guy was unwell, you know, very, very much a head case, still on parole, I mean, I'm sorry, in prison, you know, denied for parole. many, many, many times. And yeah, I, I, that guy was definitely a whack job, and I wouldn't put him in that category.↗

33:05@joann_marieBut I mean, you could say the same thing about Cerrcan Cerrcan, right? And he was definitely MK Ultra, so maybe there's something. I, I will look into it. I, I never thought of this.↗

33:16Speaker 4Yeah, it's,↗

33:17@joann_marieit's... We should give the, we should give the↗

33:19Speaker 3disclaimer, we should give the disclaimer that you know, do your own research, right? For everything that you hear on this space tonight, you should go do your re-research, and the information that I've prepared tonight is designed to motivate you to go do your own research, because, a-and Ian, you, I think you've been in these spaces before, I could spend four hours on the Martin Luther King assassination, like easy, and I have, on these spaces before. We don't have that kind of time, right? 'Cause we're gonna go through a lot of assassinations. So, number one,↗

33:52Speaker 3we Of every single assassination to you guys tonight. We're gonna go over the big ones, we're gonna go over the major details and some of the major players and, you know, those types of things. And the idea is for you to take that information, go do your research, right? We want you to have the, the information or the beginnings of the information, 'cause we just don't have time to like get down, down and dirty into the weeds and all of them. So, you know, what Mark, and I think that was Mark who just talked about the John Lennon assassination, so what I'll go do after this is I'll go start looking into that. It's like, okay, somebody who's looked into this says it was really just a deranged fan, and that's where I'm gonna go start looking. I'm gonna go look into this deranged fan, I↗

34:36Speaker 3The information I'm giving you, go do your own research, see if you agree with me, disagree with me, you know, and if you find something interesting, throw it up on the timeline, right? So that's, I guess that's the disclaimer I would give, at, at the outset here. Does that sound about, does that sound fair?↗

34:51Ian MalcolmOh, it's, it's absolutely fair. And, and this, it's, it's worth noting, a lot of the spaces that we hold, what we're often doing is challenging the narrative, right? And, and Anybody who's not familiar with his work, I don't know what you've been doing on X, but, if you look into them, I mean, this is a man who's done a massive amount of historical research on a significant amount of topics, and so this is one where, you know, we, we will touch on some of those, for example, like Martin Luther King, and maybe that's actually a good place to start. Certainly a very high-profile celebrity and one that was tied not only to, let's say, race re-relations, but also the↗

35:36Ian MalcolmAll of these are gonna be provided as food for thought, consideration, some of them a little bit more edgy than others. So some of this is, I don't wanna call it purely for entertainment value, but, you know, some of the things that we'll be leading to are probably going to be, conversations that you should dive into further, you should look into the additional details. Sam has certainly a lot of material on some of these that we will speak about, so we'll try to put those into the purple pill so you can always follow up on them. but again, th In that vein, more so than some of the spaces that we've held in the past, where we're saying, "Here's the official narrative, here's why we can absolutely tear that apart." and so that is a wonderful disclaimer to throw out there, Sam, first and foremost. Yeah.↗

36:20Speaker 3Oh, sorry. Oh, oh, sorry, go ahead. Go ahead. No, I was also gonna↗

36:23Ian Malcolmwelcome, we got Prashant and Game of Thrones up here. I, I know both of them, probably have seen and, and experienced to some extent some of↗

36:37Ian Malcolmand just, I figure since I said hi to everybody else, Game of Thrones and Prashant, any, any thoughts or additions before we start kind of unpacking some of the roster here, of these individuals?↗

36:47Speaker 5Yeah, it's been more than a minute, but, God bless you all, it's good to be back. Oop. Oh, just- Anybody hear me? Quick hi, that's it. Carry on, guys. Go ahead. No, you didn't miss a thing, brother. Go.↗

37:00Speaker 6Anybody hear me?↗

37:00Speaker 5We can, Pr↗

37:02Speaker 6Yeah, I just, you asked for suggestions, and I don't know the details of this gentleman that was assassinated and his whole family, but it-- and he was in the government somewhere in Minnesota. He was from Minnesota, and he was running for president. And my memory is that he was probably gonna be win. He, he was really, really, really popular. And him and his whole family were killed in a plane crash. And I don't remember his name, I wish I could, maybe somebody else can remember, but my memory is,↗

37:35Speaker 6he was against the status quo, against the establishment. He reminded me of being against it like John Kennedy, and he was very, very high in, let's say, the polls, or he was fa- he, it looked like he was gonna win the presidency, and him and his whole family were killed in a plane crash shortly after. My memory is shortly after he was like in the top of the race. Does anybody remember who that was, the, the gentleman? That's not,↗

38:03Speaker 3that's not ringing a bell for me.↗

38:06Speaker 6Yeah, maybe I'll look it up and then bring it back to you.↗

38:08Speaker 3Yeah, do↗

38:08Ian Malcolmthat, do that. Yeah, no, absolutely, and, and feel free to, yeah, feel free to jump in. I mean, the, the goal here to run through some of these, these names, but, very curious. We had, we had Blue Sky throw in the idea of Prince,↗

38:26Ian MalcolmControversial, and it's actually also, as a funny little nod, I just wanna give credit, I, I, I saw the post that was made, by A Political, who, in some of these memes that were floating around about, Dan Bilzerian and the idea of things that happened at his house, A Political went on this long comical rant and ended it with, "And then he served us pancakes," which, speaking of Prince, it reminded me of the skit that Dave Chappelle did for anybody, familiar with the↗

38:56Ian MalcolmI, I, oh, sorry.↗

38:58Speaker 6I found out who it was. It was Paul Wellstone. Paul Wellstone was the gentleman who was assassinated. Oh,↗

39:03Speaker 3was he the one that died in a plane crash in Alaska? Was that the Alaskan plane? No, no, he--↗

39:07Speaker 6I don't know if it was in Alaska, but he definitely died in a plane crash. He was from Minnesota. He was running for president of the US. I do recall that. I do recall that↗

39:16Speaker 3now. But I don't think he was in a position to win anything at the time, though.↗

39:20Speaker 6Well, I, I-- my memory is that he was. I could be wrong, but my memory is that he was in a position to win. But he was totally anti-establishment, and so that's why I thought my ideas, that's why I thought they killed him. That's my idea.↗

39:36Speaker 3no, I'm sure you're right. A plane crash, by the way, I'll, I'll give you guys my biases. Anybody who dies in an aviation accident Assassination. That's an assassination like ninety-nine point nine percent of the time. Aviation accident, assassination. falling off a building, assassination. Those are the, those are the two big ones. I would put auto crash,↗

39:59Speaker 3third place behind those, you know, plane crash, falling off a building, and car crash. Those are, those are classic assassinations. Sudden heart attack, you know, sudden heart attack, that's, that's another one. Those, those are probably-- and it's interesting, the more you read into this and dig into this, the more you find. So, hey, we might miss some. You know, I, I do recall Paul Wellstone now. I have looked into that in the past, not an expert on him.↗

40:25Speaker 3but, that's, that's a good, that's a good reference right there. That's a, that's a great reference right there. So that's, that's what we're gonna do in this space, is we're gonna give you leads↗

40:39Speaker 3to, to And the reason for that is you've gotten, for many of these assassinations or suspicious deaths, we've all gotten the Fed slop, we've all gotten the standard conventional narrative all our lives, right? In the textbooks, the newspapers, magazines, television, movies, TV College, whatever, right? We've gotten the conventional narratives for all of these deaths and assassinations our whole lives, and so, and that hasn't been balanced, right? That hasn't been balanced. We've been fed an engineered narrative that's not been balanced. So I'm not coming here to give you balance, I'm coming here to give you a counterbalance. So I am, I, I am loading up on the other side of the, the, the Minority Report, if you will, right? If you guys are familiar with the movie Minority Report. Sometimes there's disagreement amongst the precogs who can see the future, and that's the minority report and the dissent, right? So that's what I'm giving tonight. I'm gonna be loading you up on the dissent. I'm gonna be loading you up on the, unconventional narrative and the facts that challenge the conventional narrative. Not looking to be balanced at all, looking to be completely biased. Because, I want to give you the other side of the conventional narrative that will help you maybe find the balance, right? Because you haven't been getting the balance, so if that makes sense.↗

42:06Speaker 3but I don't even know where to start, Ian. Like, should we start with Abraham Lincoln? Well, I think we're gonna start with Abraham. You wanna go chronologically or what do, what do you wanna↗

42:14Ian Malcolmdo here? Well, we, we, I, I think we'll probably end up bouncing around a little bit, but, but what we could probably do is start within the political arena of people that were having a, a significant impact on the zeitgeist, and, and a, a curious little place to start actually might be a rather inflammatory character here, which would have been Rockwell, and I say this because while looking into the individual that, that took the shots, at Rockwell that obviously resulted in his death, there's perspective, let's say, clues that we could garner that perhaps, John Patler, that perhaps there was some kind of ethnic involvement or ties. But the thing that's more curious when I was looking into the backstory here, and Sam, I'm not sure if you have some thoughts, and, and color to add to it, but But so it's worth noting that obviously Lincoln Rockwell, was, was part of the, you know, kind of sympathetic movement that was taking place in the United States towards what was taking place, not only, World War II and thereafter, but also they, they were trying to rally essentially a sense of nationalism. They were certainly-- there was a tinge of racial dynamics that were, you know, absolutely infused into it, and, and that absolutely were in opposition To anything that they perceived as either, let's say, downstream from the communists or from what had been taking place in Russia. And here's a couple curious parts about this individual that, that was ultimately,↗

43:53Ian MalcolmI, I guess, held responsible and accountable for the, the death of Rockwell. which is in particular, so here's five points illustrating the accusations of Rockwell and his, let's say, His cohorts, who had kicked this individual out of their party under the belief that he had Bolshevik leanings So first and foremost, the Marxist leanings of this individual, contemporary accounts and party records noticed that Patter began showing Marxist sympathies and influences, creating friction within the movement. the second piece, this is really a curious one, Sam, there was an attempt to organize actively Anti-Nordic sentiments within the ranks of this organization, and he was trying to rally what they defined as, I found this one really curious.↗

44:51Speaker 3And you're talking about the organization being George Lincoln Rockwell's organization?↗

44:54Ian MalcolmThat's exactly right. Yep, right. Yep. So his, his killer inside the organization was trying to rally what he referred to as the dark-eyed, party members. That's a direct quote. they were in opposition to either Nordic or Greek heritage What he called as the blue-eyed devils, which framed internal division in the class and ethnicity, which echoed, and this is actually straight from AI, echoed Marxist-style agitation. And I love this 'cause these are direct quotes from this. Such coded↗

45:27Speaker 3language, isn't it, Ian? It's coded. So, so you got, you guys gotta train your ears for this. It's, it's Bolshevik, communist, Marxist, anti-white, like Pattern, my pattern, noticeer is like, where, where did, where did these zeitgeists come from? Where does the communist impulse and the anti-white impulse, like, what's, where does that come from, right? Like, that's coded language, right? That's coded, those are coded prejudices, right? That come from Jews, come Jewish supremacy. That's, we're not shying away from it in this, this, in this space, right? And that's, that's what that is. That's the reservoir, that's the reservoir for these types You know, when you talk about a disease outbreak, you know, when there's an Ebola outbreak or a H1N1 virus outbreak or whatever, monkeypox outbreak, you know, out in the wild, they talk about what's the reservoir of disease, where does it come from? And, you know, the investigators will go out and try to find the reservoirs. Is it a poisoned well? Is it, you know, some, some chickens, some birds? You know, where's the reservoir for this disease out in the wild? And↗

46:30Speaker 3Bolshevism, Marxism, communism, anti You know, what's the reservoir for these civilizational toxins? What's Jewish supremacy? That's the reservoir for these things. That's, that's the principal originators of, of these animosities, these antagonisms, right? So that's really interesting, I hadn't heard that before, that, that the assassin had Marxist leanings and anti-white leanings. I'm like, that's, that's like coded↗

46:57Ian Malcolmlanguage, you know? no, absolutely. And, and so get this, Padler had previously left the ANP and formed a rival American National Party, which was seen as obviously sowing division. The return then to the group was brought in with reinforced suspicions, however, of internationalist or Marxist-influenced political ideology, which ultimately led to the expulsion, amid personal rivalries, partially due and downstream- From his Greek ethnicity, which clashed with what were perceived as Aryan purist factions and the power struggles that resulted. so this labeled or ultimately resulted in Bolshevik concerns, fears, essentially kind of communist ideology, curiously from a guy who, who wanted to round up all the dark-eyed members of the party in opposition to the Aryan blue-eyed individuals and those that were perceived, I suppose, as more northern- European in ancestry or heritage. So, it-- and I bring this one up because again, it was very, very curious because obviously some of these very high-profile individuals, I mean, George Lincoln Rockwell, a, a individual that in his era was kind of a leading advocate and outspoken, very vehemently so, against concerns of communism and internationalism and how that was being, infiltrated into what he perceived as the United States government, into their culture, and- Et cetera, and this window of the world, when you think about it, I mean, this is now, you know, you're getting post World War II, you're getting right into this era where cultural, let's, I don't wanna call it rot, but what we see today as, as the, the grandchildren of the cultural rot that is essentially the Frankfurt School, all of this was really starting to brew, right? The, the bomb was starting to formulate, and he was one of the earlier individuals looking and seeing the problems and calling these things out and saying, "This is infiltr Traded the United States. So, I, I found him an, an interesting. You mentioned, maybe another aspect of this kind of social, social culture clash, with Martin Luther King, and perhaps as a, a segue into it, I thought George Lincoln Rockwell would be a very interesting way to kind of kick us off. Again, the heritage or ethnicity, perhaps up for debate, maybe we should do some more research there, but the, the idea that he had Marxist ideologies and leanings was adamantly against the idea Blue-eyed or Aryan individuals, you can really start to see how perhaps that individual, especially given he left and then he came back, and when he came back, he had these internationalist ideologies, it's like, well, isn't that curious that he brought them back, created all this infighting, tried to create a schism within the movement, and then ultimately would pull the trigger on that individual who obviously was leading a very pro-American, pro-essentially white nationalist, but if nothing else, very anti-communist party. So, Sam, I thought it'd be kind of an interesting one to kick things off with.↗

50:01Speaker 3Well, that's, that's interesting because I think we should circle back to Rockwell, because in my opinion, and this is gonna go for many of these assassinations, we don't always know who the, the triggerman is in some cases. In other cases, we know the triggerman, but we don't know the power behind the triggerman, you know? Or, or maybe we know motives or- We only know certain facets of the case. In my opinion, when it comes to George Lincoln Rockwell, we have to understand the political climate of the 1960s and the different forces that were being deployed and engineered. And when you understand that George Lincoln Rockwell represented real white American nationalism, which is what they were trying to stamp out of the American spirit They had to get rid of him. And, and so we're gonna have to, take a survey of the nineteen sixties and look at some of the other assassinations and what was going on with those to truly be able to situate, and contextualize the George Lincoln Rockwell assassination to sort of help it leap off the page, so to speak, because for most people it will just look like a crazy lone gunman. Right? But when we understand the larger forces that were involved in the '60s and all the political assassinations that were happening in the '60s, then you begin to get, you begin to get a sense of what was going on there and why they took George Lincoln Rockwell out. Now, George Lincoln Rockwell didn't just oppose Bolsheviks and communists, he also hated conservatives, okay? And many of you, this is gonna challenge many of your sensibilities, but conservatism Is the enemy of nationalism, okay? It's the enemy of nationalism. Why do I say that? Because conservatives,↗

51:39Speaker 3they are, they're not racist. They don't wanna be racist. They wanna be egalitarians, meritorians, meritocracy. they have these ideas that there's, you know, private businesses should be able to do what they want. And, you know, so, George Lincoln Rockwell talked a lot about this. He said that, you know, the, the conservatives are actually weak. They're weak, and they don't have the power to overcome the forces that are trying to stamp out white American Christians.↗

52:07Speaker 3And that's because, there's this racial egalitarianism and this secularism, if you will, that's baked into the conservative cake, where we can't have, you know, religion. You know, so many conservatives believe that the First Amendment precludes having religion in the public square, right? it means that, we can't discriminate, you know, immigration status on the basis of race or national origin, right? That's conservatism. Conservatism was pushed by people like William, F. Buckley, who was an FBI informant, he was CIA, he was, Bilderberger, he was a member of Skull and Bones. He started the National Review, which is a flagship, the flagship magazine and torchbearer of the conservative movement,↗

52:58Speaker 3and he hired a bunch of Trotskyites and ex-communists and, and Jews and various other people, of that character to staff his magazine. And he actually used his power at the National Review and his political influence to stamp out organized resistance to communism. He, he Basically, waged a war against the John Birch Society and other anti-communists in the nineteen sixties and seventies↗

53:26Speaker 3in favor of conservatism. And if you look at the nineteen sixties, the major, another major bearer of conservatism was Barry Goldwater, who was of Jewish descent. He ran against Lyndon Johnson in the nineteen sixty-four presidential election. And by that point in time And this is gonna, and Ian, this is gonna take us to the JFK assassination.↗

53:50Speaker 3But at this point in time, in 1964, JFK has just been assassinated, and now Lyndon Johnson's running, for president on the Democrat ticket, and Barry Goldwater's running on the Republican ticket. And surprise, surprise, both candidates are for civil rights. They're for the civil rights overthrow of America, which is thought to basically-↗

54:11Speaker 3Destroy the white foundations and the Christian foundations of America. Up till that point in time, up until 1965 of course, America was a white country, an explicitly white nationalist country. Only, only basically white people could become citizens, only pe- white people from certain European countries in certain, ratios could immigrate to America.↗

54:36Speaker 3That of course changed with the 1965 Immigration Act. But which was part of the civil rights era push. And so you had a situation where they engineered a Democrat, Lyndon Johnson, who was for civil rights, and a Republican of Jewish descent, who was also for civil rights. So they're, they were creating a Hegelian dialectic, a false dichotomy. You can have a, a Democrat or you can have a Republican, but no matter which one you choose, you're gonna get civil rights. Now, people like Malcolm X And George Lincoln Rockwell, these guys are nationalists. They didn't want integration, they wanted, you know, Malcolm X was a black nationalist, he was also anti-Semitic, he understood Jewish power and Jewish supremacy, so did George Lincoln Rockwell. And for a brief period in the early '60s, they explored, some kind of coalition. There's a famous picture where George Lincoln Rockwell is at a speech, in fact, by, by Malcolm X. You guys can go find that online. But the point is, is Malcolm X and George Lincoln Rockwell, these↗

55:39Speaker 3Segregate or the integration of the white man and the black man and creating a multicultural, you know, utopia or whatever. They don't believe in that. They believe in going their separate ways, white people continuing to have their country and then black people going off and being able, being able to have their own thing. And so that didn't fit inside this artificial Hegelian dialectic that the Jewish supremacist overlords were engineering, right? And so-↗

56:04Speaker 3So you gotta take 'em out. We can't have these, we can't have a real nationalist movement. George Lincoln Rockwell represented a real nationalist movement, a, a, an unapologetic pro-white, anti-communist, anti-Semitic movement. Can't have that. Gotta get rid of 'em. We need the fake, the fake American movement, conservatism, okay? That's what that is. And In opposition to the Communist movement, in the Democrat Party, because the Democrat Party was populated with a bunch of, a bunch of communism, right? A lot of these Jews who were in the Democrat Party came from the Communist Party USA, which was founded by Jews, okay? Founded by Jews, led by Jews, you know, half the, the party membership was Jewish. And then after the Red Scare, after Mc- the McCarthy era and the Red Scare of the late forties and the nineteen fifties, and the Doctors Plot and the Soviet Soviet Union, where Stalin murdered a bunch of Jewish, Jewish doctors. I don't know, I'm laughing. they,↗

57:10Speaker 3worldwide the Jews sort of started jumping off the communism bandwagon, the organized communism bandwagon, and- In America, they, they left Communist Party USA and came into the Democrat Party, but they still were communists. They just weren't part of Communist Party USA. So they brought all of their agendas, all of their goals, all their objectives into the Democrat Party: open borders, multiculturalism, getting rid of,↗

57:39Speaker 3Christianity, destroying the nuclear family, you know, all these, feminism, you know, all these All these different social isms and movements that they unleashed upon America, those come in through the Democrat Party, but then they're also seeded into the-- certain of those things are also seeded into the Republican Party. And so by the time the 1964 election comes around, you have both parties embracing civil rights. And that comes, and this brings us to JFK. Now, a lot of you guys have heard about the JFK assassination. It's been talked about a lot. It's, it's almost burned over in, in certain respects. We know about- Israel and the nuclear weapons. We know about, American, the American,↗

58:21Speaker 3Zionist, the AEC, the American Zionist Council or whatever it was called, it was the forerunner of APAC, that JFK and RFK were, were trying to get to register as foreign agents under, under FAR. We know that, Kennedy was advocating for Palestinian right of return in secret, w- at the United Nations. we know that he was cultivating good relationships with the Arab states. We now also know That he intended to draw, down the American presence out of Vietnam and get us out of Vietnam, and that was bad for Israel. And I'll get into that a little bit.↗

58:55Speaker 3We know all that, Ian. But what a lot of people don't know is that some of the major signature landmark civil rights, legislation from the nineteen sixties was passed Off of the momentum generated by the assassination of JFK, I'll give some examples. The 1964 Civil Rights Act, and the Immigration Act of 1965, which repealed the National Origin Quota System and opened up America's borders. These, both of these pieces of legislation, I believe also the 1965 Voting Rights Act as well,↗

59:34Speaker 3these landmark pieces of legislation That were critical to overthrowing the white foundations of America. were actually part of John F. Kennedy's agenda. These were things he was advocating. He wanted to look at undoing the national origins quota system. He wanted to look at expanding voting rights. He wanted to look at, you know, more integration and equality for Negroes. But they↗

1:00:00Speaker 7weren't politically popular at the time. And, in fact, when the, the voting-- or, or excuse me, when the Immigration Act was passed in nineteen sixty-five, Americans were still something like two point four or two point five to one against it. Congress passed it anyway, and the reason why they passed this leg-- these legislation, the Civil Rights Act in nineteen sixty-four, the Voting Rights Act in sixty-five, and the Immigration Act in nineteen sixty-five, is because that's what John F. Kennedy wanted. And he just got assassinated. And there was this national trauma and- Momentum to, well, this is what he wanted to do, and he's been tak- tragically taken from us. We need to pass this to honor his memory, if you will, right, under this sort of this national trauma.↗

1:00:42Speaker 7And that is a view, that is a, a reality that I don't think it's enough, airplay in the JFK assassination is that They exploited his assassination to bring to pass massive important portions of the Civil Rights Overthrow of America. All right? And his assassination, and they'll even talk about this, they'll say that his assassination made possible many things that previously weren't possible, created a climate where things could be possible that previously weren't possible.↗

1:01:13Speaker 7So I think we have to look at that also as a motivation for taking him out. And, and when, when we get to Martin Luther King, we'll see that they, they once again use assassination to advance their political, their political and legislative objectives. So that's, that's sort of a, a viewpoint with the JFK assassination that I don't think a lot of people appreciate. Yes, there was the nukes. Yes, there was APAC. Yes, there was Palestinian right of return, yes, there was his, intent to withdraw the United States out of the Vietnam War, which was really a neocon war for Jewish supremacy, before we had the term neocon.↗

1:01:53Speaker 7But there was this, this set of civil rights objectives that weren't politically feasible until after they took him out, and then that created a climate where they could get those things passed.↗

1:02:07Speaker 7I think I see, I see some hands. Maybe some people wanted to comment on it, on any of that.↗

1:02:11Ian MalcolmYeah, let's, let's see. and I also wanna welcome, Rabbi Malleus up to the stage. Always, wonderful to have you, Mr. Malleus. And if you want to, maybe line up a jingle that might be appropriate for, for this space on assassinations, if you've got one, I, I know your library is rather vast. But let's get- I wish I had a song about assass↗

1:02:31Ian MalcolmWell, fair enough. it's a, it's a reasonable thing to not have a song about, in all fairness. but let's go to, Cyrus and then see if, anybody else wants to, to hop in on anything said so, thus far.↗

1:02:44Speaker 8Thanks, Ian. I've been invited to debate a Jewish woman in an English space, and I'm-- I came into this space because I wanted to see if anybody has like a "How to Debate a Jew" template. I've got my bookmarks. Yeah, don't. I've got my memory.↗

1:02:58Speaker 7Don't. Well, don't. Like, it's just, I don't know, you're wasting your time. I don't know what you're saying. Well,↗

1:03:06Speaker 8I think it's more for the benefit of the people in the space. You gotta, yeah, you↗

1:03:09Speaker 7gotta stay on the attack. I will say, stay on the attack, press the attack, don't get on the defense. Always, they'll try to attack you and put you on your back foot and on the defensive. Defend yourself. Don't defend your positions, don't defend yourself, make them defend their positions. The,↗

1:03:29@malleusigthe, the general, the, the basic Jewish argument strategy is ABT, always be talking. The entire-- if you watch any of these people arguing with anyone, even if they're not arguing about Jewish things, I watched a very good example of this with the debate between Brian Shapiro and, what's, Andrew Wilson's wife, Rachel Wilson, and it was just basically that over and over again. He never actually addressed any of- Answer points, answer the never questions, you just kept talking. And so the only way to fight it is to always be talking yourself.↗

1:04:05@malleusigThe↗

1:04:06Ian Malcolmonly, o-only other thing I would add to the mix of that is, in my own personal experience, this isn't an all Jews do this thing, statement by any means, but in many of the debates, that I found myself in on these subjects online, the one thing I notice is done a lot is essentially the one plus one plus one equals seven,↗

1:04:29Ian Malcolmrhetorical game that is played, where it will basically be, well, this and this equals this, and this and Is also this, and therefore we know that, and so, ta-dah! And so the way to do that is to ensure that you don't allow multiple points to be made that go unchecked if you know one needs to be checked. And so in other words, be very specific with language. And if they say, "Well, we know this and this and this," say, "Hang on, hang on, let's walk through each one of those three points. Do we really know this? Can you defend that?" And what I will often find is that For whatever reason, people will waffle, they will try and redirect, they will try and go-- And so, an easy example, the media's not owned by Jews, and I will say, "Oh, pause. Let's, let's discuss the five biggest media companies. Can we list those off?" And then you force-function that, right? So you go through one, two, three, four, five. What percent of the media do those five companies make? Who runs all of those five companies? And then you need to say, okay, so when you said that that isn't true, how can you say that if that, those five groups represent eighty, ninety, ninety-five percent of all of the things that are in the theaters? How can you make that statement? And so you need to be very specific with the rhetoric and don't allow generalities to be made. It, it'll just, you'll get buried underneath it. Personally speaking.↗

1:05:49Speaker 9Yeah, I wanted to add a couple of things that I read about the Kennedy assassination. I read a book once, I think it was titled Seven Reasons John Kennedy Was Assassinated, and the two that I didn't hear Sam mention was he had printed money outside of the Federal Reserve System that he wanted to change. Yeah,↗

1:06:05Speaker 7I've debunked that multiple. That's a, that's a Easily debunkable rumor, by the way. Okay, well, that's a-- Executive order, that's Executive Order one one o one o, I think, is what it is. Easily debunkable. Yeah. That's a, that's a totally- Okay, so you, you may know more- Yeah.↗

1:06:22Speaker 9You may know more about that one. That was in a book I read. The other one I read is that he was in talks between the Pope and Khrushchev to try to bring peace between Russia and the US, and of course, the war mongers wouldn't want↗

1:06:36Speaker 7that And he, he was actually starting to make some strides, in, in, in those negotiations. And of course, the Israelis can't have global nuclear disarmament at that point in time, right? While they're trying to arm up. So that, a lot of that is tied up in the Israel nuclear question, because the, the main piece that, that Kennedy was pursuing, once again, was nuclear disarmament. And at that point in time, in↗

1:07:07Speaker 7nineteen sixty-two, sixty-three, when Kennedy's This war with Ben Gurion over Israel and its nuclear program. There were only five nuclear powers in the world, and it, it may be possible that nuclear, global nuclear disarmament might have been possible because, because the United States, the Soviet Union, China, France, and the UK, those were the only five nuclear powers in nineteen sixty-three, and of course, the United States, France, and the UK were aligned, and the Soviet Union and China were aligned. So if the United States and the Soviet Union could get together on that, then actually global nuclear disarmament was perhaps in the realm of, like, possibility, plausibility even. And that's when you have some of these early, these early treaties, get, you know, get signed, back then. And so obviously Israel can't have that because they want the bomb at all costs. At, at all costs, they have to have the bomb. So they don't want the United States and Russia getting together in peace over nuclear disarmament, right? So I think that you have to, you have to situate that That, that impulse, right? because, because the Cold War was also lining up in the Middle East along those lines. The Soviet Union was lining up behind the Arab countries, and the United States, of course, was, was, lining up behind Israel. So, again, a peace between the United States and the Soviet Union cools off, you know, the war between the Arabs and the Israelis can't have that either, right? So, just for context. Great comment.↗

1:08:43Speaker 7and, and let's stay on Kennedy for a second, Ian, because I do wanna bring some new information that I've learned, in addition to what we've just talked about. How do I, how do I introduce this? The movie JFK. Okay. Probably many people in this space are familiar with the propaganda that is the movie JFK, 1991, right? Oliver Stone directed, Zachary Scott wrote it, both of them are Jews, produced by Arnon Milchan, a Jewish Israeli, weapons trafficker and spy, okay? That's who produced, the movie JFK.↗

1:09:21Speaker 7again, his name was Arnold Milchan, he was an Israeli Jewish, weapons trafficker, okay? He was critical in helping build Israel's nuclear program, in fact, and he was a spy, okay? He's the guy that produced the movie JFK.↗

1:09:36Speaker 7And the movie JFK did two things, two major things. It painted, the assassination of JFK as a CIA plot, and it painted- Vietnam as a military-industrial complex, complex plot, you know, the military-industrial complex, that the Vietnam War was fought for the military-industrial complex, and that that was wrapped up in getting rid of Kennedy because he was an impediment to the Vietnam War and the other things that the military-industrial complex wanted to achieve. These are the, these are the twin propaganda points of the movie JFK, and they both-↗

1:10:16Speaker 7Obscure the reality that Israel was behind both, Jewish power was behind both. of course, you know, it wasn't the CIA specifically that wanted to take JFK out, although James Angleton, the director of counterintelligence at the CIA, he was Israel's guy inside the CIA that helped him likely carry out that assassination, James Angleton, director of counterintelligence. He headed the Israeli desk inside the CIA for something like twenty-one. Years, something like that. And he's the one that spied on Lee Harvey Oswald, helped set up Lee Harvey Oswald as a patsy. He also presided over the theft or selling or transfer of our nuclear secrets to Israel throughout the 1960s.↗

1:11:03Speaker 7He also had a role, I believe, in, in the, the, the Watergate scandal in overthrowing, Richard Nixon. That's not been talked about a lot, maybe we'll talk about it tonight. That was a political assassination of sorts, a non-uh, resulting in non-death, but it was the assassination of a political career. He was involved in that, I think, covertly.↗

1:11:25Speaker 7But that's the movie JFK, okay? And the PR for that movie was done by a man named Frank Mankiewicz, and we've talked about this even before. You know all about Frank Mankiewicz. Frank Mankiewicz was a member, was a Jewish member of the ADL, the Anti-Defamation League. He was the press secretary for Robert F. Kennedy when Robert F. Kennedy was running for president in 1968. Okay, that's Frank Mankiewicz. Press secretary, Jewish member of the ADO, press secretary, infiltrates the RFK campaign in 1968. We have it on video, we have it on video, and we also have an eyewitness.↗

1:12:00Speaker 7from the Ambassador Hotel in 1968. We have an eyewitness, and we have corroborating video for her testimony showing and demonstrating that Frank Mangowitz is the man who directed Robert F Kennedy into the pantry where Sauron Sauron was waiting to shoot him. That's Frank Mangowitz. You fast forward a few years, Frank Mankiewicz writes not one, not two, but three books, helping sell the idea that Richard Nixon was a crook to America. He wrote three books in the early 1970s, I think in 1973, 74, and 75. He wrote three books about Watergate and the resignation of, of, and downfall of Richard Nixon. Okay.↗

1:12:42Speaker 7Fast forward to 1991, he does the PR for the movie JFK, and he writes a famous essay. And he set, and he sets up a false dialectic, and he says, "Look, you know, maybe it wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald. We, as Americans, we should be able to interrogate that, we should be able to challenge that, we should be able to investigate it. And if we think the CIA did it, then by golly, we're gonna say that. " You see what he's doing? Setting up a false dialectic. You can either believe it's Lee Harvey Oswald, or, or if you don't think that, then here it was the CIA, right? And in reality,↗

1:13:19Speaker 7the Vietnam War was fought for many reasons, but one of the major reasons it was fought was to build up America's military-industrial complex and war machine. And the reason why America's war machine needed to be built up is because Israel needed to be supplied with all the armaments and munitions it needed to, achieve supremacy in the Middle East. it fought the 1967 Six Day War, of course. Against its Arab neighbors, and then it fought them off again in the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And especially in the 1973 Yom Kippur War,↗

1:13:56Speaker 7Israel's back was against the wall, and that's when Golda Meir basically used Israel's stolen nuclear weapons to blackmail Nixon into launching the largest aerial military, you know, re-armament supply, operation in, in human history, called Operation Nickel Grass. And we sent them tanks, and fighter jets, and artillery, and money, and all kinds of stuff. Largest, largest, you know,↗

1:14:26Speaker 7supply, you know, operation, military supply operation in, in recorded history. And the only reason America was able to do that was because of the military, the buildup of the military-industrial complex that resulted from the Vietnam War. Prior to the Vietnam War, the defense budget was quite small. I think in like nineteen forty-eight, nineteen forty-nine, the, the national defense budget had shrunk to like eight or nine billion dollars per year.↗

1:14:54Speaker 7And, and by like 1967, 68, 69, at the height of the Vietnam War, that had ballooned up to like a hundred and ten, hundred and twenty billion dollars a year. And, and massive, massive buildup in the military industrial complex. So yes, it was benefiting the milit- the United States military industrial complex, but that was being hijacked to then supply Israel in the nineteen-seventy-sixty-seven Six Day War, and especially the nineteen-seventy-three Yom Kippur War. And, Ian, that's persisted to this day. Why has Israel maintained supremacy over all its Arab neighbors to this very day? To this very, because they have the shield of American military power. And who gives them all their billions of dollars every year and all their weapons and fighter planes and military shielding and aircraft carrier battle groups? It's us! It's us. And why are we able to do that? Because of our massive military-industrial complex capability. And that first is kicked into gear by the Vietnam War. Now, John F. Kennedy wanted to get us out of Vietnam. He issued National Security Action Memorandum two six three in October, I think it's October eleventh of nineteen sixty-three, that began the process of the drawdown of American troops out of Vietnam. And the day before he was assassinated, he remarked to his assistant press secretary that Vietnam wasn't worth one more American life, and that when he got back to Washington from his Dallas trip, he was gonna do something about that.↗

1:16:21Speaker 7And the plan was to completely exit Vietnam by 1965. Well, that would have been catastrophic for Israel, right? Because The Vietnam War basically moved the Cold War out of the Middle East. It shifted everybody's attention out of the Middle East and away from Israel. It gave it room to operate, right? It took that war between Russia and the United States, or the Soviet Union and the United States, took it out of the Middle East and put it over in Bumfuckistan, you know, Southeast Asia, way far away from everything. But it built up the military-industrial complex so that we could begin supplying Israel with all the armaments it needed to gain supremacy over its neighbors. That's what that was, that's what the Vietnam War was, and that's what Kennedy was gonna take us out of. And literally the day after Kennedy's funeral, Lyndon Johnson issued National Security Action Memorandum, Memorandum two seven three, which basically reverses Kennedy's,↗

1:17:19Speaker 7Memo two six three. And calls for a massive escalation in Vietnam. And of course, this was being driven by his National Security Advisor, architect of the Vietnam War, Walt Rostow, a Russian Jew, okay? That's who drove-- He was known as the architect of Viet-- of the Vietnam War. He was also so powerful in the Johnson administration, he was nicknamed America's Rasputin, okay? Of course, then after Johnson's voted out, Kissinger comes in and he continues prosecuting the war. So you have to understand that the Vietnam War was this Jewish neocon-led war before we had the term neocon, before we understood what these people were doing and the way they were hijacking our foreign policy and hijacking our military and building up and hijacking our military-industrial complex for their own ends. The Amer- they built up the American war machine for Israel, and to this day we're still paying the price for that. So that's, that's baked into the cake. So that's, so that's the movie JFK, right? Where it,↗

1:18:17Speaker 7where they hide the involvement of Mossad and, and, and, and the Jewish mob, all right? Jewish supremacy, if you want, Judea, the, the international Jewish nation and its role in the assassination of, of JFK, and it also hides and obscures what the Vietnam War was largely about. It does both of those things. But here's where I want, why I wanted to bring that out, here's a new piece of information, Ian. This is new. It's actually not new information, but it's new to me, and I think it might be new to you, and, and your audience.↗

1:18:47Speaker 7And that is, that movie was based on New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's, investigation into the JFK assassination, right? I mean, that's what the movie's about. It's about Jim Garrison. He's, he's played by Kevin Costner. He's the District Attorney of New Orleans, right? And he, and he, you know, investigates the, the JFK assassination, and that's what's portrayed in the movie JFK. Well, here's what I, here's what I learned, Ian. You know, Larry King, the broadcaster? You know, Mr. Suspender, Larry King from CNN, you know? Oh, oh, oh, how,↗

1:19:21Ian Malcolmhow could, how could anybody forget, right? Yeah,↗

1:19:23Speaker 7yeah. Okay. Well, Larry King is Jewish, for anybody who didn't know. I, I just... And he wasn't. I recently learned this, it's out of one of Larry King's autobiographies, one of his books. He, has a very long and storied career. but to, to, to simplify this... He was living in Florida at the time when Jim Garrison was, doing this, investigation, this JFK, his JFK investigation, in the early seventies, late sixties, early seventies. And he was friends with a Jewish mega businessman and, basically a, a criminal gangster Jewish businessman named Lou Wolfson, okay? And they were both friends with another Jewish lawyer in Florida named Dick Gerstein, okay?↗

1:20:13Speaker 7They got with, the Jim Garrison investigation, and they met with him, and Jim Garrison was complaining to them that, that the city and the state was cutting off his investigation. Basically, the state of Louisiana wouldn't finance his continuing investig- continuing investigation, right? Because the shooting took place in Texas, he's in Louisiana, the taxpayers in Louisiana are like, "Hey, we don't wanna fund this anymore." And they met with him, these three Jews met with him, and they agreed to fund his investigation into the JFK assassination. Isn't that fascinating? You don't say. The people behind Jim Garrison's investigation into these gentiles, okay, Clay Shaw and all these guys,↗

1:21:04Speaker 7was funded by Jews.↗

1:21:07Ian MalcolmWow. And, and, it's-- When it's, when it's not every single time, it's funded every single time by, by, by some kind of resources. And, and don't forget, Sam, an-another crazy piece about this, speaking about celebrities and the media, Frank Mangowitz also then went on to run NPR, which is National Public Radio. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's right. That's↗

1:21:36Speaker 7right. That's right Tripled the, the, the, the, the base, the listener base of NPR, tripled it under his, under his stewardship.↗

1:21:44Ian MalcolmYeah, so, so, I mean, think, think about how wild this is. So the same guy who arguably is the reason that RFK walks into, let's say this, walks through just this one door, goes out into the kitchen area, gets shot, and dies, the same person running press for them then runs the movie and the press for the movie Movie about the, the death of his brother, which we can also look into, and we know exactly who was behind that, and, writes three books,↗

1:22:15Speaker 7writes three books selling Watergate to America.↗

1:22:19Ian MalcolmYeah, selling Watergate. So we've got, okay, we've got without question, we've got the death, via Jack Ruby of Lee Harvey Oswald, Jewish. We've got reasons to believe JFK, Jewish. We've got reasons to believe his brother RFK instructed to go out a door, which resu-- resulted in his death, Jewish. That guy then is responsible for authoring all of the books to bring down Nixon, Jewish. At which point he then gets asked to participate In the press for the movie JFK to rewrite the story and the conspiracy, Jewish, funded by Jewish,↗

1:22:56Ian Malcolmonly to then find out through your latest work that the very person portrayed by Kevin Costner, who did the investigation to try and ensure everything was buttoned up Funded by Jews, and then that very guy, Frank Mankiewicz, then of course, goes on to do NPR and basically tell Americans how to think for twenty or thirty years and grows the audience base by, in your words, three X. What, that's one person. Think of all, all of the don't require community. Incalculable.↗

1:23:23Speaker 7Incalculable. This is why I'm like We've all been in a space where one Jew comes into the space and just completely derails the space, just absolutely just throws it off for like a half hour before it's, and it takes like a half hour to get a space back on track when these people come in. Now imagine like seven million of those people in your, like, just all throughout your government and economy and institutions, derailing things. And, and look at what one man accomplished, Frank Mangels, one guy.↗

1:23:54Ian MalcolmWell, and, and the wildest piece of the Mankowitz story is to think that, so there's this one individual who's weaving his way through, essentially manufacturing both the reality and the retelling of the reality, who likely in cahoots with, or at least connected to, the other individuals that were financing the detective, like, and that's the challenge, right? Is you can envision if you have essentially spies that are running through your nation for the detriment of it and the benefit of some nebulous force, the, the state Within the state, if you will, that this interconnected group of people are able to subvert and, like you're saying, do immense damage. And look, I mean, each one of the layers that we just pointed at, people can say, "Well, here's a, a, a reason to question this, that, or the other thing." But it's, it's like the other day when I said in a space when you've got all the smoke billowing out of the house, it's, it's reasonable to say that there's a fire inside, and there's, there's certainly↗

1:24:53Ian MalcolmEventually, either leading to the death of somebody, the political death of somebody in the case of Nixon, or the retelling of the history for the purposes of covering that up. So it, it, it's just absolutely remarkable. I see Mark has his hand up. Mark, any thoughts on anything that was just shared there with the, the Kennedys?↗

1:25:10Speaker 10Yeah, just to wrap up, or just to, add to Robert or to John F. Kennedy is, you know, this whole notion of the military-industrial complex being built up or the pressure from various, factions to ramp up the military industrial complex, such as the, Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Cuban crisis. So, you know, after the Bay of Pigs failed attempt of the Bay of Pigs, one year later, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as you may know, you know, came up with Operations Northwood, that was proposed to John F. Kennedy, which, which essentially was a false flag,↗

1:25:50Speaker 7plan. Well, it was a series of false flags. It was a series of- He's a false flag attack on America.↗

1:25:55Speaker 10Yeah. Yeah, but that, that one was particularly interesting, and, you know, I even went so far as to kind of describe the, the area, part of the country that it would have been. It would have been in the, in the southeast area, Florida, Guantanamo Bay, that sort of thing. But, yeah, you know, he, he ab-abviously, he, he declined, he decided not to. Give the green light, which, you know, definitely angered Joint Chiefs of Staff. So yeah, just, l-lot of interesting stuff there. Of course, you know, obviously- Yeah. We↗

1:26:29Speaker 7should be, we should be clear about this though, because people will try to say, "Well, Kennedy was assassinated because of the Bay of Pigs, because he went against the Joint Chiefs, and he went against the CIA, so that's why they had to take him out." The reason why we know that's bullshit is because after they took him out, they didn't go back into Cuba Then, then how come they didn't go into Cuba after that? So that's how we know that the whole Bay of Pigs is a, is a misdirect, and, and all that's just, that's just a misdirect, like an excuse to, like, implicate the CIA, because they killed JFK. Guess what? Still no invasion of, of Cuba. Right. Right? So that's how we know that's bullshit. So that's important to, that's important to put out there because people still talk about the Bay of Pigs, the CIA, and I'm like, "Yeah, but then they didn't go into the-- they, they didn't go into Cuba after that, after they killed Kennedy."↗

1:27:19Speaker 10Well, I think- I think, you know, that's bullshit. Yeah, I think what's, what's, what's, what the takeaway from that was the length that- certain factions will go to to accomplish, you know, an escalation in military force, right? And, and of course, you know, that, so that didn't happen, 'cause it, it was supposed to be, you know, nine-eleven type, type of carnage that was gonna be, that would have happened, and of course, that didn't happen, right? And until, you know,↗

1:27:48Speaker 7Man, that, that exactly, yeah, yeah, yeah. 9/11, the new operation northwards. But no, but, you know, the, the, it's interesting, good additions, good additions, good comments. you know, Ian, but we're not done, we're not done with this Larry King JFK thread, 'cause we're still not done, believe it or not. Still not done, believe it or not, because↗

1:28:10Speaker 7and let me just get to it here. Give me a second to navigate to it. Because one of the interesting, you know, with many of these assassinations, there are secondary assassinations, right? Like there are many people assassinated after JFK was assassinated and beforehand, which we'll talk about, that were critical in to help cover up the JFK assassination. And one of those, one of those assassinations was a, a man by the name of, here, let me, I'm always, I always get this reversed in my head here.↗

1:28:41Speaker 7Give me one second. there's a friend of JFK who'd been, who had been appointed by JFK ambassador to Ireland, and he was, his friend, Edward Grant Stockdale. Edward Grant Stockdale, I believe, was a businessman, I think he was from Florida. He becomes close friends with, with JFK. Okay. JFK appoints him ambassador to Ireland. On, interestingly, on Memorial Day, 1963, JFK went and visited the grave of Admiral James Forrestal, who had been the first Secretary of Defense, okay, after World War II. And he had been a Secretary of the Navy, then he became the first Secretary of Defense. He was murdered as well, in a, in a, a phony suicide made to look like a murder, thrown from his sixteenth floor hospital window. That's, that's Admiral Forrestal, we'll get into him too. But on Memorial Day, 1963, JFK goes and visits his grave. JFK visits Forrestal's grave at Arlington National Cemetery with his friend, Edward Grant Stockdale.↗

1:29:49Speaker 7Okay, who goes by Grant Stockdale. And there's a picture, famous picture of this, of Kennedy visiting the Forrestal grave, and the man that's behind Kennedy is Edward...↗

1:30:00Speaker 11Grant Stockdale. Okay. Four days after JFK was assassinated, on November 26, 1963, Stockdale flies to DC to have an emergency meeting with Bobby and Ted Kennedy. We don't know what they talked about. hasn't been, Dan hasn't ever been divulged, but after that meeting, he told several friends that the world was closing in. Then just a few days later, on December 1st, just nine days after Kennedy was killed, he met with his lawyer, William Freites, who recounted that Edward, quote, "said something about those guys trying to get him, then about the Kennedy assassination. He knew and was closely associated with almost all the top figures in the cabal," unquote. Right? So let me read this. So this is, this is Edward Grant Stockdale, Kennedy's close friend, had been ambassador to Ireland. Has just met with the Kennedy, surviving Kennedy brothers a few days previous on November 26th. Now it's December 1st, he's meeting with his lawyer, William Freites. And again, this is what William Freites said happened.↗

1:31:07Speaker 11Grant said something about those guys trying to get him. Then about the Kennedy assassination, he Noon was closely associated with some of all the top figures in the cabal, unquote. Okay, so that's December 1st. December 2nd? He falls to his death from his 13th floor office window. And this takes us back to Larry King.↗

1:31:34Speaker 11Larry King,↗

1:31:37Speaker 11oh crikey, I had it pulled up, but, it timed out. So give me one second. Larry King turns out was the last guy to talk to Stockdale alive on December 2nd. Stockdale calls him And, let me just, let me, let me grab up, I gotta, I gotta grab the page again 'cause my archive.org timed out.↗

1:32:02Speaker 11Okay. This is what Larry says about it.↗

1:32:09Speaker 11Larry says The aftershocks kept coming, and they often hit in ways that couldn't be immediately understood. I got back to the radio station where I was working and began phoning people who knew Kennedy. I reached the former ambassador to Ireland, Edward Grant Stockdale. His wife was a prominent poet, and they lived in Miami. The ambassador was disconsolate to the point where he couldn't get a word out. He was moaning and groaning over the phone, I didn't even know if he heard me. Later on, he jumped out of the window of his downtown office building and killed himself. The only thing on his desk was an issue of Life magazine with Kennedy pictured on the cover.↗

1:32:49Speaker 11and then he's, and then he says, "Talk of the assassination must have filled my radio and television shows for two weeks straight. I did one show with Dick Gerson, that's the, the Jewish lawyer who he helped fund Jim Garrison with,↗

1:33:03Speaker 11but it's funny because he says, in his book here. He's like, "Anyway, it gets all complicated, just go watch the movie JFK." That's what he says to do. So, so first he tells us that Stockdale was just disconsolate, couldn't get a word out, was moaning and groaning, don't even know if he heard me. Later on, he jumped out of his, the downtown office building window, right? And then he, and then he said some more stuff, and he's like, "You know, just go watch the movie JFK by Oliver Stone." So, so like Larry King, this was like the, the latest conspirator Ian that I, I didn't know existed. I didn't know Larry King was like a JFK conspirator, like I didn't, you know? Like I didn't see that one coming, but I found this a couple weeks ago, and,↗

1:33:48Speaker 11it was just, and I was looking for something else, and this just, this kinda popped up, but like, so number one, we have a guy who's, close friends with Kennedy, connected. And meeting with the Kennedy brothers, talking to his lawyer saying they're after me or whatever, you know? And, and then Larry King's the last guy he talks to, and then he jumps out of his thirteenth- We're supposed to believe he just like, he was so, he was so just distraught over his buddy JFK's death that he threw himself from his thirteenth floor office, thirteenth story, office window.↗

1:34:26Speaker 11And that's all Larry has to say about it. Larry King's the last guy to talk to. Sam, brother.↗

1:34:31Ian MalcolmSam, bro. I know, I know, I know you mean well. Sorry, Larry, please don't interrupt. I don't know if you do mean well, which is why we're not gonna play the game that way. Sam, it's, the, the telling here with the thirteenth, thirteenth floor reminds me of, Roger Pudaccer in Ace Ventura. just taking a jump off.↗

1:34:52Speaker 11No, but, you know, it's interesting, that's a great reference. it's interesting, the, I guess the CIA, one of the early CIA manuals on assassination says that a fall, a seventy-five foot fall onto a hard surface is the easiest way to assassinate somebody. And wait, wait, it, it states that? Yeah, yeah. And, so, I don't know how many stories that is, seventy-five feet, what is that? Seven stories-ish? Seven, seven and a half stories, but, but anyway, so like, you know, here we have Stockdale, close friend of JFK, falls to his death out of his 13th floor, office window with, with, mental health issues, according to Larry King. And of course, this is what's-- this is now in the record, if you go look up Grant Edward Stockdale.↗

1:35:43Speaker 11or excuse me, Edward Grant Stockdale, and look up his death, it'll just say it was suicide due to mental anguish or whatever. That's, that's in the record now. That comes from Larry King. It comes from Larry King.↗

1:35:54Ian MalcolmWell, and, and it goes to show, Sam, the, the wild piece about this, i-in some ways, and we can apply this to this particular death, the Kennedys, we could even do with the Titanic, right? The, the, the way the story is told in the aftermath can completely change what happened, completely retell the story, and then actually utilize the retold story for ulterior motivations, right? So there's, there's almost, twofold, air quotes on this one, benefits that could- be brought out of these things. On the one hand, you get rid of a problem, on the other, you use it as an opportunity to advance X, Y, or Z, and it just seems like the, the continual pattern where not only are these awful things done, they're then rewritten and, and of course, the actual culprits are just kind of, you know, dusted under the rug. with that being said, I wanna welcome, of course, Dr. Recktenwald. Always such a pleasure to, to↗

1:36:50Ian Malcolmhave you up here, Of individuals and in particular thus far, have really focused on kind of the, the, let's say, maybe sixty years ago. And in doing so, it's been wild because Sam's been walking through this journey that has not only included some very prominent political figures, but now we're weaving this web that includes the likes of Larry King and Frank Mankiewicz, which were big, you know, individuals in the media that prospectively were involved, and in fact were directly involved, at least, In correspondence, but have been walking through as well as the social impacts that were a byproduct of this. And, and Sam, to maybe take us back and then also to be able to include Dr. Recktenwald in this. So we've gone through, we've talked about, Rockwell, some of the connections with, with the individual who killed him, in particular to some of the Bolshevik leanings. There's also the fact, oh, by the way, that very guy that shot him, that party that he went off and started by,↗

1:37:54Ian MalcolmHappened to be co-founded with a Jew, isn't that kind of curious? And that Jew, prior to this individual killing Rockwell, that individual that he co-founded that group with, also kind of weirdly died of, quote unquote, suicide. How, how strange that might be. So, so Rockwell, as well as, you've got MLK, you've got Malcolm X, who very prominently spoke out against this group. Sam did the incredible thread on MLK and all the backstory there. We walked through the Kennedy brothers, we walked through the political assassination of Richard Nixon Tied into this exact same group of people. Now Stockdale and Fordale, so it's, it's very curious, but Sam, to go back even prior to some of this, one thing that's kind of curious, right? We just talked through all of these individuals that were involved with the shifting zeitgeist around these, these windows of race, re-relations, let's call it, right? But you can even go back twenty years prior and somebody put into the purple pill, I hope you guys at some point will talk about George S. Patton, which is kind of a curious This one, and, you know, while we couldn't necessarily connect dots with the drivers, the thing, Sam, I'm not sure if you've looked into this one, but, you know, obviously Patton had, in particular, in his letters that, I mean, you guys can pull these directly from Grok or from any of the AI, but some of these, just to read a direct quote, "The Jews have no concept of sanitation, hygiene, and decency. They are, as you know, subhuman individuals similar to those we saw in internment camps." He goes on to talk about the smell, the attire, the behavior, the demeanor,↗

1:39:30Ian Malcolmvery, very, very nasty presentations, let's just say. And the thing that's most curious, Sam, about his death, and, and this is-- we'll just consider this a really quick little tangent, not to go too deep into it, but the thing that I always found very curious about it is that the drivers and the other individual in the car were essentially fine. And yet Patton suffered immense, damage, physically, in particular to his skull and the rest of his body, which is kind of curious in some ways. It's, it's very bizarre you would have a very low impact collision, two people get out just fine, then you look at the third guy and you're like, "Ah, he's about to die," which I always found a little bit- It's↗

1:40:08Speaker 11my understanding that he was actually in the hospital and doing okay, that he, his situation was stable, as I understand it, and then all of a sudden, all And very suspicious, right? And we, of course, we know the quote, "You know, we fought the wrong enemy," and he wanted to keep going into the Soviet Union and take out, take out the communists, and, you know.↗

1:40:29Speaker 11So obviously, I, I'm not an expert on the Patton assassination. I haven't, I only know it from like the surface level that you've just talked about for the most part.↗

1:40:36Ian MalcolmWell, and, and Sam, the, the reason that I bring it up is because, you know, the, the we fought the wrong enemy. That's one of the most chilling quotes that I ever learned in this little journey because what could have been if the United States had prospectively repositioned and done something differently and maybe listened to that man. And the last little thing that I'd say is that by all↗

1:40:59Ian MalcolmOr Sam, I'm kinda curious for your thoughts on this. I mean, he was in a position where he was essentially revered as a hero. I don't wanna liken him to Caesar necessarily, but, you know, he was a, he was a conqueror who went out a war hero, could've come back, had a huge cult of personality around him, and prospectively could've been president of the United States with an ideology that said, "We should have fought the communists." And so I'm kinda curious, Sam or Michael, if you wanna talk on that, and then we'll come back↗

1:41:28Speaker 11I'll let Michael take that if he wants to. Hi, Mike. W-welcome to the space, by the way.↗

1:41:33Speaker 12Hey, yeah, good to see you. Great to hear you, Sam. I'm, I'm here because of you. No, no offense, Ian. I don't blame you. I'm here because of myself. No, I wanted to hear this stuff. That's, it sounds very fascinating. It's really good. yeah, Patton was a very, peculiar case, wasn't he? He, somehow broke out of the, the mesmerism that the rest of them were in and saw what was going on, and,↗

1:42:03Speaker 12yeah, it's no, no surprise that somebody, they took him out because he was dangerous. you wanna talk about, America First Movement, that, that's what you would have seen, and it would have been, You know, like you said, one, it says we fought the wrong enemy, and certainly wouldn't have abetted, the Soviet Union. You know, I mean, basically we handed over,↗

1:42:26Speaker 12you know, almost all of Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union, letting their-- letting them expand their empire. Then we put, put up this, you know, this fake Cold War that came after it. The, the Cold War was fake. I mean, it was financed by the, the bankers in the United States. They financed the revolution, and then as,↗

1:42:52Speaker 12Anthony, you're talking↗

1:42:53Speaker 11about the Communist Revolution in nineteen seventeen.↗

1:42:56Speaker 12That's correct.↗

1:42:57Speaker 11Yeah, that was Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, yes, these Wall Street, these Jewish Wall Street bankers. And we're gonna get into them more as, as the night progresses when we get into the campaign. Oh, okay, I don't mean to jump ship↗

1:43:06Speaker 12on you. No, no,↗

1:43:06Speaker 11no, no, no, no. I'm, I'm, what I'm doing is I'm teeing up what we're gonna talk about later for people, so I want them to make a little mental bookmark, '↗

1:43:22Speaker 12Continued to fund the Soviet Union long after that, and, providing them equipment to make munitions, some of which was used on our own, soldiers in Vietnam. So it's unbelievable, the whole Cold War was a total fraud on both countries, and, you know, basically a military-industrial, complex too. So anyway, right, and because it's↗

1:43:45Speaker 11a global Hegelian dialectic, if we can have two sides that are at war, we can keep pitting them against each other, we can grind down the goyim and make a shit ton of money.↗

1:43:55Speaker 12Exactly, that's exactly right. And, and that's↗

1:43:58Speaker 11why, so many of the Bolsheviks, I think, you know, even into the nineteen forties, something like forty or fifty percent of the NKVD leadership, which is the Soviet secret police, were Jewish. You know, the anti-Zionist, people who led the anti were prominently Jews. You know, they called it, they called it Zionology, the department of Zionology. I know, yeah, yeah.↗

1:44:18Speaker 12They started the whole rhetoric that, you see that's used by the left, anti-Zionists left now.↗

1:44:24Speaker 11Yeah.↗

1:44:25Speaker 12All that rhetoric comes straight out of, of, of Soviet, diction. It's, it's unbelievable. So, you know, then you have to sort this out, what's going on with that? We, you know, I'll leave that for another time, but, how do you, how do Like it is with this, you know, subversive shit coming out of the Soviet Union to begin with.↗

1:44:49Speaker 11No, and I, I talked about it in spaces before, and maybe we'll do another one, Ian, but just briefly what, you guys, what Dr. Recknagel was talking about is, in the Soviet Union, they had a department of Zionology, and they were what you would call anti-Zionists, and they came up with all sorts of propaganda. Zionism isn't Judaism, Zionism is fascism, Zionism is Nazism, all of these talking↗

1:45:12Speaker 11They were literally invented by Jews in, in the KGB in the Soviet Union. 'Cause remember, as I said earlier, the Soviet Union was aligned with all the Arab countries in the Middle East against Israel and the West, right? That's, so if you're thinking again Hegelian dialectic, two sides crushing the Goyim between, between themselves, right? A perpetual war and profit.↗

1:45:35Speaker 11So what they, what they did, just briefly again, they developed those talking points to ca- so, so that, Jews wouldn't be blamed for Zionism. And, and really, Dr. We see this on the other side. You'll hear people, Zionist Jews like Ben Shapiro say that, Bolshevism isn't Judaism. You know, the Bolsheviks weren't Jewish. Yeah. They'll say, he'll say that the ADL isn't Jewish, it's just left wing Democrats. Right? And so you actually get this on both sides, there's sort of this, you know,↗

1:46:07Speaker 11Jews have this, this high tribalism, this high in-group preference, and they will fight with each other doggedly, you know, they will go to war against each other, they will, they will argue amongst themselves, but when it comes to them versus the goyim, they're absolutely together. And And so, yeah, you know, you'll Zion, you'll have Zionist Jews on the right that'll attack the internationalists, communist Jews on the left, you'll have the communist international antisemites, Zionist Jews on the left attacking the Zionist Jews on the right But they won't ever blame Judaism or Jewish supremacy.↗

1:46:38Speaker 12The, the, the Soviet Union was at first, you know, at the founding of, of Is-- Israel in nineteen forty-eight, they were actually very pro-Israel, bro. They were. And, so they flipped because Israel started courting the United States for its money and its, support and its, you know, right. And so they, the Soviet Union said, "Ah, you know, so it shows you they're such softists that they'll change their position." At the drop, at the drop of a hat, on a total, on a totally opportunistic, whim. Has nothing to do with what they, you know, there's no principles, no real guts.↗

1:47:11Speaker 11A great point. Look at Shabbos Kestenbaum. You guys all know Shabbos Kestenbaum? This guy was a Democrat Jew until he spoke at the RNC, you know, during Trump's, Trump's campaign. Now he's like Mr. Republican. You know, these guys have no principles. It's all about advancing Jewish power. What's the best Agree that they should be, you know, on, you know, what is best for Jews and Jewish supremacy. And, and so anyway, that's where this antisemites comes from, you know, Zionism versus Bolshevism, Winston Churchill's famous op-ed from nineteen twenty or twenty-one or twenty-two, "Zionism versus Bolshevism." The original antisemites were Bolshevik Jews who didn't believe Zionism was the way, and they aligned with communism in the Soviet Union, and then throughout the Cold War era, they're pumping out this rhetoric. You know, giving cover to their Zionist Jewish brethren, right? Blaming it on Western imperialism, blaming it on Nazism, blaming it on white supremacy, right? Blaming it on the West, blaming it on European colonialism.↗

1:48:14Speaker 12This is a huge point, Sam, if I may intervene here, just a second. Yeah, go ahead. because, see, this is why it is so important to have, like, if you're gonna be anti-Zionist, just for, you know, sake of argument here, but I think this is very important. That you don't fall for this bullshit like, "Oh, you know, Israel is just our proxy, they're, they're sort of our satellite in the Middle East, they're, they're actually an outpost of the United States, actually we're really responsible for what they do."↗

1:48:46Speaker 12this, this is really bad because it's false and it allows them to get away with it. it, it, it exonerates them. Israel from any culpability for what they've done, and it blames us. Unbelievable. And these people go along with it. This is why I had a fight with Dave Smith. Dave Smith keeps insisting, you know, oh, actually, when it comes down to it, actually the United States is really most culpable.↗

1:49:11Speaker 12well, you know, what do you mean by that? We've been extorted by your, by Israel, by, you know, by your people, because he said he wasn't an anti-Israel guy. This was another thing Really pissed me off. Like, what do you mean you're not anti-? He's, this is a guy that says he's anti-statist, that is against the state in principle, saying now he's not anti-Israel, even though Israel's the worst state on the, on the planet. I mean, you know, this is just... Anyway, sorry for hijack. I don't mean to hijack anything. No, no, no, this is, this↗

1:49:43Speaker 11is really important. This is really important to, this is gonna give a lot of context to all these assassinations, really. I↗

1:49:52Speaker 11We have to understand the geopolitical reality to, to sort of be able to situate these assassinations, right? you know, to understand Vietnam, what was Vietnam? Vietnam was essentially the same as what's going on in Ukraine right now. What's Ukraine? It's a proxy war between the United States and Russia that's- Giving cover, or it's giving Israel to make moves in the Middle East, because Russia is being occupied, or has been occupied now, fighting Ukraine for several years and fighting NATO, which is just the United States.↗

1:50:26Speaker 11What that's done is it's made it so Russia can't project force in the Middle East like it's wanted to. In the, in the Syrian civil war in twenty fourteen, when they first tried to overthrow Assad, Russia came to his aid and kept Syria from collapsing. And kept Assad from being deposed, that was twenty fourteen, and that was because of, the ability of Russia to project force into Syria and across the Middle East.↗

1:50:51Speaker 11Well, so if you're gonna take out Iran and Syria and your opposition, if you're Israel, if you want Greater Israel and you want regional hegemony over the world island in the Middle East, you gotta take out Syria and Iran. Well, you can't do that with a strong Russia. So what do you have to do? You have to take Russia off the, off the, off the game board. You have to take 'em out. So you do, you get 'em embroiled in this war up north in Ukraine. And who do, who do you use to do it with? With the United States, 'cause you control 'em. We're their golem. We've been their war golem since the 1950s and 60s. you could even say World War II, you know, even since World War II. Maybe even World↗

1:51:33Speaker 11That's what's going on. That's one of the things that's going on in the Russia, Ukraine, US war right now is that weakened Russia, right? So they weren't able to backstop Assad. So then Israel, and the United States, and Turkey, obviously I think led by Israel, they were able to Foment this civil war in Syria and take out Assad and carve up the country, and now Israel's basically completely gutted any formal, military opposition to Israel in Syria, and that gives them a completely uncontested lane, air lane, straight to Iran, right?↗

1:52:12Speaker 11And so now this isolates Iran, right? And Russia can't backstop Iran now it would like, now how it would like to, because again, it's been weakened. And Iran has lost the shield that was Assad, and it's lost the ability to supply its proxies through Syria, as it was doing, into Lebanon and, and, the Houthis, right? And into Syria. So So it was important to take Assad out, so to do that, you have to take out Russia. So now, that's what's happening now. So now we go back to Vietnam. What was happening in Vietnam? It's sort of a similar situation, but slightly different. You're still moving the war out of the Middle East It's still between the United States and Russia. I mean, that's what Vietnam was. It's a, it's a war, but it's a proxy war between Russia and the United States. That's what Ukraine is. It's a proxy war between Russia and the United States. That's what Vietnam was, a proxy war between Russia and the United States, only in that case, rather than trying to weaken Russia, so to speak, as what we're doing in Ukraine,↗

1:53:17Speaker 11you know, which gives-- 'cause the, again, this Russia-Ukraine war that's going on, that's Allowing Israel room to operate in the Middle East, okay? Vietnam was doing the same thing. We moved the Cold War out of the Middle East, we moved it over here to Southeast Indochina, okay? That gives Israel room to operate in the Middle East unencumbered. That's point number one. That's the first similarity with the Russia Ukraine US war. The second similarity is in the Russia Ukraine US war that's going on now, that was meant to weaken Russia. But in Vietnam, it was the, it was the other way, it was to strengthen the United States' war-making machine. We're gonna build up the U, US war machine through the Vietnam War, and that war machine is then gonna be able to supply Israel with everything it needs to dominate the Middle East, you see? That's what was happening in Vietnam. Walt Rostow, National Security Advisor, Russian Jew, he was the architect of the Vietnam War. His brother, Eugene Rostow.↗

1:54:14Speaker 11Okay? Was the Deputy Undersecretary of, is like the Undersecretary of State, Foreign Affairs or whatever, whatever his title was, he was an Undersecretary of State, Deputy Secretary of State. He was the one, he was in charge of basically defending the legality of the Vietnam War on the world stage, selling it on the world stage. Then you had Arthur Goldberg, who had been a member of the Supreme Court.↗

1:54:40Speaker 11But Lyndon Johnson convinced him to step off of the Supreme Court and go be an ambassador at the UN to sell the Vietnam War to the UN, okay? And then when, when Johnson got rid of, when Goldberg off the Supreme Court, that's when he installed another Jew, Abe Fortas, onto the Supreme Court. And that actually takes us back to what we were talking about earlier about Larry King Right? And, and backstopping Jim Garrison's investigation into the JFK assassination because Lou Wolfson, Lou Wolfson, this dirty businessman, Jewish gangster from Florida, who was helping fund Larry King and fund Jim Garrison's investigation, he gets into some business trouble, and so he's like donating a bunch of money to Johnson, and he's trying to get Abe Fortas on the Supreme Court to basically grant him clemency or to toss Out the case or save his, save his ass is what it amounts to. Abe Fortis isn't able to ultimately save his ass, but they try anyway. It's, there's a lot of Jewish influence peddling. And favors and backroom deals going on in this era between all of these players, okay? And again, with this Eugene Rostow connection, again, again, Eugene Rostow, brother of Walt Rostow, Walt Rostow's the architect of Vietnam, Eugene Rostow's the Under Secretary of State who's defending the Vietnam War. Eugene Rostow is the guy who conceived the Warren Commission. He's the one that has the idea for the Warren Commission and sells the idea to LBJ. To have this special commission to investigate the JFK assassination.↗

1:56:25Speaker 11It's his idea. He's the one that gets Allen Dulles onto the Warren Commission. Allen Dulles, former disgraced member, head of the CIA. Okay? Allen Dulles, we now know, was being blackmailed at the time by Reuven Shilo, or Reuven Shiloah, who was the first director of Mossad. Okay, so we know now that Alan Dershowitz was being blackmailed by the Mossad at this point in time. The Warren Commission was presided over by one of Eugene Rostow's, I think, law students or fellow faculty members,↗

1:57:00Speaker 11Earl Warren. That's why it's called the Warren Commission, right? He's the head of the, he's the head justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren. He presides over the Warren Commission. That also comes from Eugene Rostow. Now, another thing you guys might not know, during World War II, the Japanese were placed in internment camps, and the engineer of the Japanese internment camp program was a Jew in FDR's administration, and Earl Warren as the First as the Attorney General of California, then as the Governor of California, help sells it, okay? He help sells it, his campaign manager was Jewish, by the way, Earl Warren's campaign manager back then was Jewish,↗

1:57:46Speaker 11and then a lawyer for the Jewish mob out of Chicago, gets appointed, is appointed as the head of basically the ass, the, the, the, all the assets that all these Japanese Americans owned When they were put in these internment camps, were then they were dispossessed of these assets, and these assets were sold off. Well, this Jewish lawyer, a mobster lawyer, gets appointed head of that office, that's, that's in charge of The disposition of all these Japanese American assets, and he basically sells them off to his Jewish gangster buddies for pennies on the dollar. And one of the major Jewish gangster families that, that cashes in in California, California real estate, in California businesses is the Pritzker family. You guys might know the current governor of, of Illinois, JB Pritzker, billionaire, hotel magnet.↗

1:58:38Ian MalcolmOh, and his money, his sister.↗

1:58:41Speaker 11And his sister funds the, the transgender, all the transgender bullshit, Penny Pritzker,↗

1:58:45Ian Malcolmright? Yes, he does.↗

1:58:46Speaker 11Yeah. And they made their money off of Japanese American assets in World War II, for-- that they obtained from their Jewish mobster connections for pennies on the dollar. Okay. So Earl Warren? Runs cover for all this, and as his payback, his reward, he gets appointed to the Supreme Court. Okay? This is the real history that's been hidden from you. And as I said at the outset, Ian, for your audience who's maybe joined us since then, I'm not here to give you the balanced perspective. Because your whole lives you've got propaganda that's way over here on one side. So I am giving you all the details that you didn't get. Now it's up to you as to what you do with these details and where you wanna find, where you wanna decide personally where you think the truth is. But these are the details that have been hidden from people.↗

1:59:40Speaker 11Okay? So you can see how, foreign affairs, the Cold War, World War II, Vietnam, Jewish power, you can s- these political assassinations, you can sort to, you can start to see this tangled web of all the players, how it's all interconnecting, how it's all working together↗

2:00:00Speaker 13and how Jews are advancing their power, and these are the machinations through which they do it: assassination, favor peddling, gangsterism, you know? the, the media, right? Because they're all on one team, and they're all-- they all know that they're supposed to row in the direction of what's good for Jews and Jewish power, right? And there's disagreements between them on what that is What those decisions might be, but they're in broad agreement that they should all be doing what's in the best interest of Jews first, and whether they're Bolshevik Jews or Zionist Jews↗

2:00:36Speaker 13or international Jews, whatever kind of Jews they are. They're involved in these things, and like, I gotta, I gotta tell you, this Larry King angle just floored me the other day, Ian, when I discovered it. I mean, it was just, just crazy. For those of you who've just joined us, Larry King, the famous broadcaster, is one of three Jews who actually secretly funded Jim Garrison's investigation into the JFK assassination. I don't know if you were in the space, Michael, when we talked about that, but just to catch you up,↗

2:01:08Speaker 13and this actually ended up getting Larry King into some, a little bit of Trouble later when it was discovered. but, so there's that. And then, you know, that plays into the movie, then that plays into the movie JFK. We talked about that, how that was propaganda to hide the true motives and perpetrators of the JFK assassination and the true, motivations behind the Vietnam War. Those are both lies↗

2:01:35Speaker 13told in the movie JFK. But that also- Then Larry King is the last man to talk to Edward Grant Stockdale, JFK's close friend, who just has a bad day. Has a bad day. Ten days after the JFK assassination, he has a bad day and he throws himself from his 13th floor, 13th floor, office building. and apparently Larry's the last guy to talk to him. He says, "Oh yeah, Larry, I couldn't even get a sentence out. He was so mentally distraught." Okay, Larry, sure. Sure, bro.↗

2:02:10Speaker 13So, it's just crazy, Ian, how all of these things just kinda keep weaving together, you know? And, and of course, that takes us back to Secretary of Defense Forrestal, James Forrestal, the first Secretary of Defense, who's, who, allegedly commits suicide by throwing himself from his sixteenth floor hospital room. allegedly he's on suicide watch,↗

2:02:38Speaker 13yet they have him, they have him on the sixteenth floor with windows that open, you know, easily open, wide open, sixteenth floor, but he's on suicide watch, by the way. Okay. but we have the testimony of his brother and others. His doctor said he was improving, he wasn't suicidal. His brother said he was in good spirits, not suicidal, and in fact, was en route that day to pick him up and take him home.↗

2:03:03Speaker 13And, he's found You know, fallen to his death with his hospital sash wrapped tightly around his neck. And you guys can go look this up, there's a book called The Assassination of James Forrestal by David Martin, it's on archive.org, you can buy it on Amazon too if you wanna support him. And he ta- he goes over the case, and it's his, his hypothesis and his theory and his position that it was Zinnis that assassinated Forrestal. And in fact, Forrestal's older brother, Henry, the one who was gonna pick him up That was his suspicion too, he said, he didn't commit suicide, neither communists or Jews did this to him. And of course, we know now that means the same thing, right? Communists or Jews, okay, yeah, same thing. But Forrestal was possibly the strongest opponent to the State of Israel in the Truman administration, okay? And this, again, we're talking about 1949 here, when Forrestal's murdered.↗

2:03:55Speaker 13Allegedly falling to his death from a sixteenth story hospital window with his hospital sash tied around his neck, with mental health issues, allegedly. Sounds a lot like Edward Grant Stockdale, right? And he's a very ardent opponent of Israel and Zionism, very outspoken in cabinet meetings about it. and, and even though Israel at this point in time has declared independence, it still is- Totally reliant on the military protection of the United States and money from the United States. it's very important that it, it gets that protection from the United States. Now, something that you guys might not know, maybe you do, maybe you don't, a-around the same time,↗

2:04:38Speaker 13they send letter bombs, these Jewish terrorists, a Jewish terrorist gang from Israel sends letter bombs to Harry Truman at the White House to try to assassinate him. Right? 'Cause they're trying to apply pressure onto these guys. And there's another guy, the, British, the Brit, Ernest Bevin was the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, in, in the UK from 1945 to 1951. And he was anti-Zionist, anti-Israel. He tried to preserve the British mandate in Palestine. He tried to sort of keep the Jews in check and restrict Jewish immigration to Palestine. And he was very much not Zionist, okay? And he was trying to preserve the British Empire. This is Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Ernest Bevin in the UK. Alright.↗

2:05:33Speaker 13what if I told you, what if I told you that in nineteen forty-six, according to declassified MI six files, the Ergen and Lehi, two different terrorist gangs and is-- Jewish terrorist gangs in Israel, attempted to assassinate Bevin? The British, Foreign Secretary, or, or Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in 1946. And then of course, we know about Count Folke Bernadotte, the Swedish diplomat, right? Who saved a bunch of Jews in World War II, and then when he was trying to broker peace between the Jews and the Arabs,↗

2:06:07Speaker 13the Israelis assassinated Count Folke, Folke Bernadotte. Alright, same era, nineteen, I think, it was eighteen, nineteen, Ian or maybe Michael, somebody might know the exact year they assassinated, Count Bernard, I think it was forty-six or forty-seven or forty-eight, same time period, right? So, Lord Moyne, they also assassinated. So attempted to assassinate Harry Truman, attempted to assassinate Ernest Bevin, did assassinate James Forrestal. You see how the pieces are lining up? Probably assassinated, Patton as well. That was, I think that was December 1945 when Patton was assassinated.↗

2:06:48Speaker 13So shortly after the end of World War II. So you can see how these things are lining up. And, a-and, and I think the reason, I think it's important to study these assassinations and know about them, because they've done a lot of them, and they're still doing them. Like right now, we're in the midst of this Charlie Kirk assassination investigation. And when you start looking at all these different assassinations from the last, call it a hundred years, call it the last eighty years, call it the last sixty-five years, you know, whatever window you wanna pick. You're gonna find a bunch of assassination by these same people, or by forces that look like it's these people, right?↗

2:07:33Speaker 13Talking about destruction of the crime scene, lone gunman patsies, subversion in the media, you know, propaganda in the media and in entertainment to sell you lies. It's just a lot of breadcrumbs, lots of fingerprints, and lots of patterns that keep being repeated over and over and over again. One of the big patterns is advancing the interests of Israel. How many people did they assassinate to get Israel? Maybe Patton, maybe not.↗

2:08:03Speaker 13That might have been too early, I'm not sure, but certainly Count, Bernadotte, Lord Moyne, James Forrestal. And, you know, the other thing with James Forrestal is he was, he was very concerned about, you know, losing access to Middle Eastern oil, right? That was a big, big part of the US economy and a big part of the US war machine was cheap oil from the Middle East, and we had a lot of Arab friends, you know, at the time. And he, and he warned that if, if we supported this Jewish project of Israel, that it would turn all of our allies against us, we might lose access to the oil, and it could ignite a war throughout the Actual state of war he talked about in the Middle East, he was right on all counts.↗

2:08:46Ian MalcolmWell, in some of course, he was right on all↗

2:08:47Speaker 13counts.↗

2:08:48Ian MalcolmIt's wild, that you say that 'cause, as you did, I wanna give credit to, Rolo Tomassi who, in the Purple Pill, he added a screenshot. I guess he looked up, the forced all death. key aspects of the controversy. This, this is actually, pulled from Gemini, I believe. "Suspicious findings," it says, " In addition, like you were saying, to the bathrobe that was tied around his neck, suggesting a struggle. So if, if somebody jumps out of the, the window or off the balcony, it'd be kinda weird to just also break a whole bunch of glass by your bed before walking over to jump off the balcony. next piece, crime scene photos went missing, so the evidence that, had been retrieved by the police completely lost. and no autopsy was ever performed on the body, which is rather weird. the suicide note, the poem, the chorus from Ajax that he supposedly was copying was not in the handwriting of the individual that they claimed was writing it. And then it says at the bottom, this is the funniest, "The conspiracy theories on his death range from assassination by Zionists to involvement in a cover-up of UFO findings." That's actually what Google says. I, I hear that a lot for the UFO cover-up.↗

2:10:11Speaker 13They, they poisoned the Well, this is another pattern. They will poison the well, with slop or f-fake alternate, fake altern- a fake alternate, theory, right? A fake alternate conspiracy, which is what they did in the JFK assassination. The, the, the first fake narrative is Lee Harvey Oswald, the lone gunman. But if you don't have that one, then they'll sell you a fake counter-narrative, which is the CIA did it, right? And with Forrestal, I have noticed that. There's a lot of people who say, "Well, he participated in Operation High Jump in Antarctica and the UFO cover-up," and that's the fake counter-narrative they go with. One of the fake counter-narratives they like to push, with the Forrestal assassination. But that's absolutely↗

2:10:55Speaker 13right, the, That was the, the official investigation done into Forrestal's death, and that was actually kept classified and secret until I think like two thousand five or something, like sixty, sixty some years it was kept class-- fifty five or sixty years it was kept classified. And in that, in that, in that Wilkut report, we find out that what the press- put forth as a suicide note wasn't actually a suicide note. The investigators don't deem that the suicide note. And to your point, to his point, the handwriting doesn't match his handwriting anyway. So whether it's a suicide note or not, and it's not, this handwriting doesn't match. that's when they, that's when they also note that there's glass on, not just on the floor, but on his bed. If he was-- the, the, the, the conventional narrative, and by the way, the conventional narrative was pushed mainly by two journalists, Walter Winchell and I'm blanking on the other one. They were both very pro-Zionist and pro-Israel journalists, by the way. Okay, this is all on record. These are two super-Zionist journalists who were leading the, the narrative in the press saying these things. Walter Winchell's a big one. Some of you probably heard of Walter Winchell, very influential journalist from yesteryear.↗

2:12:02Speaker 13The will cut report, also testimony from nurses and others, and staff contradict things found at the scene. So there's contradictory testimony from what's reported at the scene, there's suicide notes that aren't suicide notes, there's handwritings that don't match, there's glass everywhere. they said that he, he tried to hang himself from the radiator on the wall. Right? And that it, and that, and that, in doing that, it tore away, and that's how he fell to his death. Okay, well, you don't smash open a window that just opens, you know? and get, getting glass everywhere. And not only that, he wasn't suicidal. The doctors all say he was doing great, wasn't suicidal, his brother was on his way to pick him up. So, a-and there's many more things, like, as I said, we can't get into all the details. but he also was threatening to- Publish his diaries. He kept diaries throughout the nineteen thirties and forties, okay? He had diaries of meetings with, with FDR, with Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy's father, with Neville Chamberlain, and very, and other influential world leaders. He kept these detailed journals, and he was gonna start publishing. Well, they confiscated his journal-- journals, and we've never actually-- they've never actually made the contents of his journals public, completely public. Some, some pieces of them, but not completely. They're still classified and hidden away. So that's another good one if you guys wanna go look into that, that's James Forrestal. And again, to put a bow on that, there's a famous picture from Memorial Day, 1963, at Arlington National Cemetery, where John F. Kennedy goes and visits the grave of James Forrestal because he'd been friends with his dad, Joseph Kennedy. He goes and visits him and in tow with him, right next to him, right behind him. Is Edward Grant Stockdale, his close friend, who's also thrown from a window allegedly, or falls from window allegedly with mental health issues, ten days after JFK is assassinated. Okay? So that kinda puts a bow on that little, on that little piece, right? and-↗

2:14:00Speaker 13I don't know how much time we have. Like, I, I'm prepared to talk about, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, Phil Graham, Mary Pinto-Meyer, Pinto-Meyer, and, and some other lesser assassinations, if you want, I can keep going. Yeah, no.↗

2:14:16Ian MalcolmLet, let's, let's absolutely. And, and it's curious because we, we basically went, some of the individuals in the '40s, we went '50s, we went '60s. That entire piece post World War II, I was almost gonna throw in as, as just a wild, example, because right, we're talking about a lot of individuals that are, these are one-off attacks on individuals, but post World War II, Abba Kovner and the entire,↗

2:14:49Ian Malcolmeffort of, of a couple dozen, Jews who, as part of the revenge thesis on the Holocaust, wanted to try and poison the waterways of Germany. I was going into this and I was thinking, that's not, just a handful. Their, their intent was to try and kill six million Germans by poisoning the waterways and their bread and their food production and all these other things, which it, it's just, it, it fits into this kind of recurring pattern where, if need be, get one person, and if need, desire, get an entire civilization of people. But that's a whole--↗

2:15:23Speaker 13Well, well, you know what's interesting, and I was gonna mention this early on, the Sicarii, the Or heard of the movie Sicario? That's these, drug cartels nowadays, these Latino or Hispanic drug cartels, they have assassins and they're called sicarios. It actually comes from a Hebrew word, "sikari," for the Sicarii. And that's the He-- those were the original assassins from two thousand years ago in the Roman Empire, they were Jews. Comes from a Hebrew word, "sikka," which means dagger, and they were Jewish assassins who would go around with these daggers hidden in their robes, assassinating people, assassinating Roman officials and collaborators with Romans and other Jewish enemies of the Jewish people, right? The Sicarii, two thousand years ago, these are the original assassins, the Sicarii, and, and that-- they're still called the Sicarios, and we all, we now Know that the Mossad has trained, we have accounts of Mossad training some of these drug cartels how to kill people and dispose of their bodies without leaving traces behind. so we should just, you know, throw that out there that there is a long and storied tradition of Jewish assassins, and if you read the Old Testament, what are they doing in the Old Testament? They're killing the prophets for testifying of Jesus Christ. What does Jesus Christ say in Matthew? He talks about how-↗

2:16:39Speaker 13You stoned the prophets and all of them who I sent unto you, right? So like, there's just, we can bury our heads in the sand about this, or we can just sort of look at history and see that these people, there's something about them, they, they kill people, they kill their enemies. They kill people in their way, that's what they do. They kill each other even. If you look at the Jewish civil war, the great, you know, the Jewish, revolt from sixty-six to seventy-three AD that,↗

2:17:08Speaker 13is put, ends up being put down by the Roman Empire. For the first part of that, it's Titus surrounds the city, right, with the legions, and he just waits him out while Jews fight a brutal civil war amongst themselves. You have the Zealots and these different factions of organized Jewry fighting a brutal civil war, and I think the Zealots actually burn down the grain supply. They like, they like,↗

2:17:33Speaker 13they burn the grain supply to starve everybody. And So, and Titus just sits out there, waits for, waits for their, their civil war to basically peter out when they, they're tired of fighting and killing each other, and then he just goes in and mops up, right? Burns, loots the temple, burns it down, loots Jerusalem, carries a bunch of Jews and loot back, back to Rome, and uses that money and that labor to help build the Colosseum, which is originally called the Flavian Amphitheater, Titus Flavius, right? That's where the Colosseum comes from. So it's just crazy how, these patterns keep repeating. Of course they have Jesus Christ killed, they use state power to kill Jesus Christ, rather than do it themselves directly. But they've been killing people for a long time. This is in their belief system. I'm sorry, but it just is, you know? And, and, you know, there's a famous book now by a guy named Ronan Bergman. It's called "Rise and Kill First: A Hist-A History of Assassinations by the Mossad." Right? And in that book, which you guys can find, you can buy it, you can find on archive.org, he chronicles something like two thousand different assassinations just since like the nineteen thirties or forties,↗

2:18:47Speaker 13right? that the Mossad has carried out to advance the interests of Israel and the Jewish people around the world. Two thousand. And, and, and that's, we're not even talking about like all the assassinations of the last few years since October seventh. I mean, look how many people they've assassinated since then. You know, that's what they do, they kill people. And it's my opinion that they're involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Same pattern, somebody standing in their way, gotta get rid of 'em.↗

2:19:16Speaker 13We got a lot of hands. Let's, let's go through these hands, let's clear out these hands. Be brief, if you have a question, ask it, if you have a point, make it, and then, and then we'll move on. Let's start with Deb. Go ahead, Deb.↗

2:19:28Speaker 14Hi. okay. So, I was gonna talk about what I saw on-- There's a person on Substack. Ian Malcolm's gonna get↗

2:19:37Speaker 15his hair blown off.↗

2:19:39Speaker 13Oh, can I speak?↗

2:19:42Speaker 13who said that? Ian, did you catch who that was?↗

2:19:48Ian MalcolmI, I did, and, that's really unfortunate. So, Andrew Sheets is, obviously a commentator who I, I think is, the, the profile picture frequently in, Suleiman's rooms. He's a former naval officer, and, it's, it's unfortunate he put something up into the nest. I know exactly that was, if I'm not mistaken, Warren Britain is the individual's name. that was his voice, if I'm not mistaken. Again, maybe Maybe I am. but↗

2:20:19Speaker 16yep, yep, yep, yep, yep,↗

2:20:21Ian Malcolmand, and if, if so, that, I think that'll be the fifth or sixth time that either verbally or in writing on this application has, suggested that he's going to kill me, and, to, to do so in a room where we're discussing assassinations by Jews, perhaps we can make an assumption about his identity. Not, not, not beating↗

2:20:41Speaker 13the stereotypes. Not beating the stereotypes,↗

2:20:44Ian Malcolmthere, kid. for what it's worth, isn't Curious, because if I'm not mistaken, that same individual also lars, that's a big, strong, white-looking guy, and he's this very small, little individual that, well, let's say he doesn't fit the, description, but what do you know, these assassins seem to change their name, hide their identities, and, and have a lot of insecurity. But, thank you for the insight. Look at this↗

2:21:08Speaker 13eleven-year-old, look at this eleven-year-old Palestinian influencer, this eleven-year-old girl who had like over a hundred thousand Blanket on her last name. She was eleven years old. She was a Palestinian influencer on Instagram. She had like a hundred and four thousand followers on Instagram. She was going worldwide viral, and Israel killed her in a targeted airstrike on her family's house. They assassinated an eleven-year-old because she was going viral on Instagram.↗

2:21:33Speaker 13That's who these people are. I'm sorry, but that's who they are. This is who they are, you know? and we just, we have to, we have to be real about this. They, we're the goyim, we're animals, descended from the lowly satanic spheres, and they let us live or die at their pleasure, I guess, you know? So they'll come into this space and threaten, threaten death upon you. It's, it's, it's absolutely crazy, but it's, sorry about that, Deb.↗

2:22:01Speaker 13go↗

2:22:04Speaker 14No, it's pretty scary actually, and I, Ian and you guys are, it's pretty scary for you guys. what I wanted to say, and maybe it's Jewish related, but it's maybe just American related too also, I, I don't know if you are on Substack or if you guys like, are in there, there's a girl that, a woman, Leah, she's ex-CIA and she's been doing a lot of research, and she's doing stuff in the detention centers. She's doing stuff A lot, across the board, just like everything, but she's posted on detention centers, and there's a request from the government website, no joke, for the new detention centers to be equipped with incinerators.↗

2:22:50Speaker 14It's no joke, it's on the government website. They are requesting detention centers to have incinerators. And that's where I'm just like, O M G. I'm sorry that's not Jewish related, it's everybody related. I think it's America related, you know what I mean? If you live in America, you should be worried about it. so I know you guys maybe not know of it, Ian, and maybe Sam, and it's new news for you guys, but you need to look on her website because she is-- She's ex-CIA, she is her own company now. I know, I know Leah. I know Leah.↗

2:23:26Speaker 13I've spoken with Leah,↗

2:23:29Speaker 14Saying it, she is saying that she has seen it, and another person has seen it too. Another person I follow that they have done, they, they posted the government website where said it that they are, they are going to do that, or they're requesting it. Doesn't mean it's approved, doesn't mean it's gonna go forward, but it's a request from this government. You know? So imagine, imagine, but imagine being swooped up, okay? Your family doesn't know you're swooped up. They don't know where you are. You're in this, wherever, detention center, and they don't know where you are, and then there's an incinerator, and if you say something, do something, whatever, it could be this like-↗

2:24:16Speaker 14And I don't need, you know, now you're just talking about the Bolshevik gulag.↗

2:24:20Speaker 13Now you're talking about the Bolshevik gulag, you're talking about the Kazakh genocide, the army, the, the Ukrainian genocide, and we know who's behind that. We know who's behind that, who has that influence. Who's↗

2:24:30Speaker 14behind that? Who's behind that?↗

2:24:31Speaker 13Please↗

2:24:32Speaker 17tell me. I think they're building the cemeteries for the Italians.↗

2:24:37Speaker 14I don't know whether they care whether you're Italian or whatever.↗

2:24:41Speaker 13Just the southern, southern Europeans and Mediterranean people, not the Nordics, just the, just the southern Italians, right?↗

2:24:49Speaker 14Yeah, I'm Nordic, I'm Nordic. But it doesn't matter, I think that if you're not pro-Trump or whatever, the crisis, you don't agree with them a hundred percent or whatever, I just, I find it very scary that they would even like want incinerators in detention centers. I find that very Hitler-like. I just find that very scary. So,↗

2:25:09Speaker 13well, let's not, let's not speak out of turn. I just↗

2:25:13Speaker 14wanted to bring it to people's attention, 'cause it's not funny. They're asking for it. They're asking for this stuff. So you can laugh all you want, but it is what it is. That's why we have to study↗

2:25:25Speaker 13the-- Unfortunately, that's why we have to study these things and know our enemy. Yes,↗

2:25:28Speaker 14yes, I agree. And that's↗

2:25:32Speaker 13what we're doing tonight. I agree. And that's what we're doing tonight. We're studying Exactly. Thanks,↗

2:25:38Speaker 14Sam. Thanks, Deb. Yeah, no↗

2:25:38Speaker 13problem, Deb. Go ahead, stay up. If you have another question, raise your hand. let's go to Rabbi. Rabbi, if you got a question, keep it brief. If you have a point, make it succinctly. And then from Rabbi, we'll go to Proshin. So Proshin, be ready.↗

2:25:51@malleusigSure. No, I was gonna expand on what, Sam offered and also what Deb offered there. to let people know, Sam, I know you know about↗

2:26:05@malleusigA Romanian born Jew, where he basically talks about from the Jewish perspective what the differences are between Jews and Gentiles, and you are going to get, more truth out of this book, than I think he was aware that he was letting on. Basically, his thesis is that the Jews look at us, non-Jews, and they see that we have this illogical and inexplicable fascination with things like sport Honor, right, fair fights,↗

2:26:39@malleusigthat Jews simply wonder at. They're like, "What are these idiots doing?" Like, they, they see a fight, basically all fights between groups as fights of extermination We see it as a fight of, we need to get the other side to submit, so then after the fight's done, we can all get along and, and kumbaya with each other and like, e-engage in this project of building society together.↗

2:27:05@malleusigJews don't see it that way. Jews look at us and they say, "You guys are stupid." You guys have no idea how to do this right. You, you, when you're fighting someone, it needs to be a scorched earth fight all the time. There isn't no making up with your enemy or your opponent even. You have to fight as if they were animals, and this tells you a lot about the Jewish mindset. They don't see any fight that involves Jews and non-Jews as something you can go havezies on. It's Every competition between Jews and non-Jews is a, is a fight of extermination, and this is the, this is the mentality they were coming up against. This is why Europe has had reactions to these people, because Europeans look at this and we say, "This is pathological. This is psychotic. Like the fact that you would simply treat every, every conflict as a war of extermination based off of your opponent not sharing your ethnicity for us." Is, I mean, it's, it's, it's, it's the, the definition of evil. No, this is a good point because, and let's↗

2:28:15Speaker 13just pause right there. This is a really good point because for the last twenty-five hundred years, give or take, Europe has been in a perpetual state of warfare with itself. I call it round robin warfare. Germany versus France, France versus Spain, England versus Germany, England versus France, you know, Sweden and Denmark versus England, and Italy versus Germany, and, it's like, like One big, like, for twenty-five hundred years, Europe's been fighting with itself. They're still fighting with itself. We got this Ukraine war going on. You had Kosovo in the nineties, you know, in Yugoslavia. Like, it, like, European war just doesn't seem to end. but we don't exterminate each other, right? We don't exterminate each other. We have wars, and they last however long they last, then we resolve it and get over it and move on, to the next war, whatever the next war's gonna be, right? To↗

2:29:07Speaker 13It's different. It's extermination, it's annihilation, it's total elimination of the enemy. T- completely different mindset.↗

2:29:15@malleusigYeah, and this tells you, this tells you why they do what they do, where like they target infants and reproductive, the reproductive ability of their opponents, because they know that if they can destroy the next generation, then the, the, the goal of exterminating the entire race is much, much easier. And, we really need to get our heads around that if we're gonna understand our opponent here. And I'm not advocating we adopt their modality, but we need to be aware of it, and we need to stop deluding ourselves that we're fighting people. We're not fighting people in the way that we understand what people are. We're fighting something else.↗

2:29:58Speaker 13No, good reminder, appreciate that. Prashan and then Blue Sky. I think Blue Sky had his hand up, so Blue Sky, get your comment or question ready.↗

2:30:06Speaker 18Yeah, thanks, appreciate it. I really enjoy your spaces, especially and especially you, you put the dots together for us, all the dots, especially World War II, the way Vietnam, really learned a lot of stuff today, I really appreciate it. I have a question, two questions actually. first of all, at the beginning, before you started the show, we were talking about And any suspect that you think that was behind by a duel. So I said Prince, and the reason I did was I just had a conversation with somebody, and I found out Prince is the only a artist like that kind of caliber,↗

2:30:42Speaker 18that kind of level in the world that never been to Israel. Think about it, someone with that kind of- Let's↗

2:30:49Speaker 13repeat that for people who might, because you have a thick accent, no offense. Prince, the artist. Is the only, you're saying is the only artist of his caliber, of his magnitude that hasn't gone to Israel?↗

2:31:02Speaker 18Never, yeah, never been to form. Exactly. Every time, every time they invited him, all kind of money, everything, every time he declined. And a lot of people saying reason why, some people saying that he was friend of, close to Spike Lee. Spike Lee is very well known, you know, when he goes to New York Knicks, you understand what he wears. He's a pro Palestinian. Stuff one angle, people say that, what people are saying that, Spike Lee influenced him a lot of stuff. Also, some people say because his background for Jehovah Witnesses. I don't know if you know that, Prince background, and that church has a lot of influence on him. That's another reason some people said that he believed that strongly, and that's the reason he doesn't, he never went there because of the way he grew up and what he believes. So what do you think on that?↗

2:31:56Speaker 18I'll let Joann or Ian↗

2:31:58Speaker 13or whoever was talking about Prince earlier comment on that.↗

2:32:02@joann_marieI don't know anything about Prince, like, at all. Ian, do you know?↗

2:32:06Ian MalcolmWell, I, I mean, I, I can't make statements on the, the death, although we talked earlier about how, he was on, of, of course, various, pills and whatnot, as are most of these, individuals from Elvis to Michael Jackson, but, but that his death was linked to fentanyl, which, certainly rather strange, would suggest he, he was either doing that, I suppose. was recreationally, but it was found mixed in with the drugs that he was otherwise prescribed to be taking, which would imply maybe some kind of foul play. But Blue Sky, that, I, I don't have much, beyond that aside to say that, Prince was very critical. There's been a couple videos, both publicly and, in some of his more intimate, conversations, where he was very critical of the ownership of, the music industry. You know, we talked earlier about how he had that, Sam, you might find this Interesting. He went out and performed with a giant shirt on and it basically said "slave" across the front of it after making public comments about how essentially all musicians were slaves to the record owners, who he called their "slavers." Which is like, wow, isn't, isn't that kind of fitting? Layers,↗

2:33:18Speaker 13no doubt. He, he wanted, he wanted people in the know to see the layers, right? No doubt.↗

2:33:25Speaker 13and then let me move on to the↗

2:33:26Speaker 18second question. Let me now, did, did you guys see the, hold on, hold on↗

2:33:28Speaker 13for a sec, hold on. Did you guys see the, video going around yesterday and today of, this museum in Louisville, Kentucky, where white people can go and wear slave shackles and basically give penance to a black guy for, for their slave, for like their white guilt over slavery? Did you guys see that video going around?↗

2:33:46Ian MalcolmSo, so, so are the, are the black guys going to help the, the white Overlooking that whole thing. Well, the, but↗

2:33:55Speaker 13the point is, is this, this, museum in Louisville was just given a million dollar grant by the city of Louisville, and the city of Louisville's mayor is a Jew. So- No,↗

2:34:07Speaker 16that's, yep, that's- Wow.↗

2:34:11Speaker 18So Sam, my second question is, as you know, you talked about earlier, the communist, how influence is. And I'm, I'm original African, I'm immigrant, I'm from, and, and I came here legally. I'm American citizen. As you know, South Africa, they have the communist, pretty much the NCA, right. They pretty much was behind by the communists. The other side you had Afrikaner, Dutch, you know, white,↗

2:34:40Speaker 18and basically↗

2:34:41Speaker 13that, that, that party, what's his name, Jules, Malema, what's his name, Malema. He, yes. And also Nelson Mandela, it was a bunch of Jews, a bunch of Bolshevik Jews that were the money power, the financial organizational power behind these guys, you know, and against the white Afrikaner population.↗

2:35:04Speaker 18That's what I was thinking about because somehow, as you know, they control everything, the Beers family, all these diamonds, and still, you know, even the White South Africans, the one, the big, you know, some of them are really consider-- I don't know if they, but there are some White South Africans that somehow kind of, connect to, to Zaire, I don't understand. I was just to do some research. Well, so the Beers family, obviously,↗

2:35:29Speaker 13the Beers family, which, you know, has Diamond cart, running a diamond cartel for, you know, over a century, they're Jewish, it's a Jewish cartel. obviously Jew-Jews aren't white, okay? So in this case, anyway, Jews aren't white, they're Jews. And, yeah, the, there was a deal, a nuclear deal, and Dr. Eckenhoff or Ian might know more about this, but there was collaboration. Between the South African government and Israel, I think,↗

2:36:02Speaker 13some sort of nuclear agreement to transfer nuclear weapons technology. And I think that Israel actually conducted, I wanna say it was like 1978 or 1979, they conducted an atmospheric, test, with the help of South Africa, in violation, of course, of the, in violation of the Atmospheric Test Ban Treaty, by the way. but they had, there was some sort of collaboration Again, I, I'd have to go bone up on that a little bit, review some of the materials on that, so somebody can, somebody else can maybe speak to that, but there was definitely a Jewish collaboration with the black population of South Africa now, and there was a collaboration between the, the white government and Israel in, I, I guess, the seventies, eighties, and maybe even the nineties.↗

2:36:50Speaker 19I don't, I don't know about South Africa, but, just on a related African note, I was, you know, I was, I was told, by, you know, one of these, Zionist interlocutors that I, I didn't care about any other genocides that have ever happened in, in the history of humanity, before Gaza, and I said, "Well, let's look into the genocide in Rwanda." And then lo and behold, who do you think armed the Houthi, Houthis that, that slaughtered their fellow Africans? Of course, it was Israel. They armed,↗

2:37:31Speaker 19they armed the, you know, the perpetrators of the genocide. So, you know, this is-↗

2:37:38Speaker 18Exactly. There was a resolution last month, United Nations, and every country in the entire world, Signed on it, except three countries, Israel, United States, and Argentina voted no, and it was pretty much saying that the greatest, crimes against humanity was pretty much slavery. Can you think about that? I mean, that's something all everyone said this was really-- The only three countries that voted that resolution, I think was sponsored by Ghana, was only Israel, United States, and Argentina. What did they have in common? Who's in charge? You figure that out. I think it was also↗

2:38:18@joann_mariebecause they didn't want, the greatest crime against humanity to be slavery, but to still be the Holocaust. So↗

2:38:26@malleusigI would actually just, I just wanna push back on the greatest crime being slavery because- Okay.↗

2:38:34Speaker 20Yeah, but the Holocaust↗

2:38:36@joann_marieis the Holocaust. It has↗

2:38:37Speaker 18nothing to do with slavery. Yeah, but it has nothing to do with slavery. I'm↗

2:38:40Speaker 13not↗

2:38:40Speaker 18saying, I'm not saying- Wait, wait, wait. Yeah, yeah,↗

2:38:41Speaker 13yeah. Everybody's gonna get a chance to say their piece, but they gotta say it one at a time. let's go Joanne make-- obviously let's let Joanne and her co-host make her point, then we'll move on. Yeah, it,↗

2:38:53@joann_marieit was Rabbi first, and then, and then we'll go to the, to Iconic, and then to Lisa Jackson.↗

2:38:58@malleusigThanks a lot. No, I just wanted to very quickly push back on the idea that-↗

2:39:05Speaker 13Guys, one at a time. One at a time. You can't both talk. So one at a time, everybody's gonna get to make their point. Joanne, who, who goes first, and then who gets to respond?↗

2:39:15@joann_marieIt's Rabbi. Go for it, Rabbi.↗

2:39:19@malleusigThanks, Joanne. No, I just very quickly wanted to push back on the, on the assertion that slavery was the worst crime or the worst atrocity of humanity. I think that killing twelve million people or sixty-seven million people, for example, pretty much trumps that. Slaves at least get to live.↗

2:39:38Speaker 13Okay, I appreciate that point. Who, who wanted to, who, who else was talking? There was somebody else that was talking. When you guys, yeah, when you guys say↗

2:39:44@joann_marieiconic.↗

2:39:45Speaker 13May↗

2:39:45@joann_marieI say something?↗

2:39:46Speaker 13Yeah.↗

2:39:47@joann_marieNo, hold on, Debbie, I'll, I'll, I'll go, I'll go to you in a second, okay?↗

2:39:51Speaker 13Was it Prashant that was next?↗

2:39:54@joann_marieOh, yeah. sorry. Yeah, Prashant, Prashant was next, and then Iconic, and then, Lisa.↗

2:40:00Speaker 21Thank you. you know, talking back to, Diaries, my memory of, in my research, and it wasn't extensive, is that- General Patton wrote in his diary about what we were discussing here, that he wanted to, pair up with the Germans and attack, the Bolsheviks or the Soviets. But the other diary that I remember of, and maybe somebody will know if this is true or not, and once again, my research isn't extensive on this, but my memory is that John Kennedy both gave speeches and wrote in his diaries that when the truth came out about Adolf Hitler He would become a very honored man. So does anybody know if that's true?↗

2:40:38Speaker 13Yes, he does write that in his, in his journal.↗

2:40:42Ian MalcolmYeah. I think it was the stuff of legend saying that the-- The stuff of legend, yeah,↗

2:40:48Speaker 13or something like that. He'll become, he'll, he'll, he'll become the stuff of legend, yeah. But, but the sentiment, but your sentiment is correct. I don't know the exact verbiage, but that's the sentiment that he did believe that when the full truth about Hitler came out, that his, his image would↗

2:41:03Speaker 21Which would be another reason they would want him dead.↗

2:41:06@joann_marieHe also visited Palestine, when he was younger and he saw the Jewish community in terrorism and how the English soldiers would like fix the, the phone lines and stuff like that. So-↗

2:41:18Speaker 13Yeah, there was, there was more context there because his dad, we touched on this earlier, his dad, Joseph Kennedy, was the ambassador to Germany in the 1930s and basically urged peace with Hitler and appeasement and also was a proponent of- The Madagascar plan. The Madagascar plan was to transfer, was to create a, a homeland for Jewish people in Madagascar. And because of his, you know, the Jews saw Joseph Kennedy as dragging his feet or being friendly with Hitler, whatever you wanna call it. Basically,↗

2:41:48Speaker 13Joseph Kennedy became an enemy of, of organized Jewry, and they've always held that against the Kennedys. And, that was something that plagued John F. Kennedy even into his presidency was his family's legacy. And so when Charles Lindbergh, Charles Lindbergh, who had been a big leader in the America First Committee movement, before the United States entered World War II, g-gave a famous speech, in I think 1940, and basically insinuated that he understood why Jews wanted us to go to war against Germany, but it wasn't It wasn't right for the United States to go to war against Germany, but he understood why Jews wanted us to go to war against Germany. And then he said, and then he made a comment, a couple sentences about how Jews had disproportionate power and influence in Hollywood and the media.↗

2:42:39Speaker 13And this, this quote was used to paint Charles Lindbergh as just a filthy antisemite, okay? And, and it, it destroyed his reputation. He was a, a, a tremendous American hero up until that point in time. And that, and they use this to, to destroy his reputation. Anyway, fast forward to when John F. Kennedy wins the presidency, he invites Lindbergh to the White House. He and his wife, Anne Morrow Lindbergh, to stay the night in the White House, and it's, it's like a really big deal, right? Because↗

2:43:14Speaker 13they have held over-- they sort of held over Kennedy, his dad's legacy, Joseph Kent-- legacy of appeasement of the Nazis and Hitler. And they hate Charles Lindbergh because he kept us out of the war longer, and so they, I think they blamed him for more Jews being killed in the Holocaust or whatever, and basically Kennedy to sort of,↗

2:43:36Speaker 13I don't know, rub their noses in it or whatever you want to call it, invites Lindbergh to the White House. You know, and, certainly probably didn't help things, to your point.↗

2:43:48Ian MalcolmWell, and, and Sam, real quick, Charles Lindbergh, here is a quote from the America First Committee meeting, nineteen forty-one. quote, "The Jew's greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and throughout our entire government." That was the nineteen-thirties quote I'm talking about. That's the quote↗

2:44:13Speaker 13I'm talking about. You know what's interesting about that? You can't get the audio of that. They have the audio of that speech, but every source for the audio of that speech begins after that paragraph. Like they, they won't even make publicly available the, the audio recording of that anymore. You can't get it. You can read it, like you just did, but the audio recording for that speech begins after that part of the quote's over, basically.↗

2:44:39Ian MalcolmThat's crazy. And, and, and that's one of those many quotes that I ran directly through Grok and other AI, and I said, "Can you, can you?" And I would always do it publicly. "Hey, Grok, can you validate this quote?" And Grok would come back, "Yes, that was actually↗

2:44:55Ian MalcolmThis is where it all gets so dystopian, and it's actually a really curious little comment on this conversation that we've had, about this subject. Once upon a time, in some ways, it was easier for them to get away with these things because you didn't have social media and people able to connect like we are right now digitally, and so in some ways it would have been, you know, much, much easier, but it also would have been so much harder for them to try and suppress genuine patriots and obscure conversations, and it's so wild To think about, I'm sure that there were people in the era of, of Lindbergh, of JFK, et cetera, that they were looking around and they knew things were off. They knew that some of these, you know, every week we got another guy jumping off of a balcony, isn't that weird, right? Like, I'm, I'm sure that it's both a blessing and a curse that we're able to connect these ways, because in some sense, we can now more easily connect with one another, but we're also just fighting the tidal wave of endless propaganda, endless↗

2:45:55Ian MalcolmThe whole thing. isn't it wild to think that literally eighty years ago, you had people saying in the United States that our press, our media, our politicians, it's all controlled by Jews? And here we are today facing essentially the exact same scenario.↗

2:46:09Speaker 13And they canceled it, by the way. Just like they do now. We'll cancel you if you say that we control the media. We will get you deplatformed from the media. Right? The head of Instagram, Facebook, Meta, what was her name? I'm just blanking on her name. She's Jewish, and she said we banned everybody who said that Zion, that, we control these social media platforms.↗

2:46:33Ian MalcolmOh, yeah, the, the, the law to combat antisemitism essentially, a pointy.↗

2:46:38Speaker 13But, but they were doing that back then. And, and again, I, I, I quote this all the time, but Osmond Baye, Major Osmond Baye, in his book, Conquest of the World by the Jews, from 1873, said the same thing. He said the Jews will ban you from the stock market and from life and commerce and ultimately condemn you without a roof over your head. That was 1873.↗

2:47:02Speaker 16Yeah, they banned, they suspended my Instagram right here for, for hateful speech and conduct.↗

2:47:06Speaker 13But we can go to the Bible. What did they do to the prophets who said things they didn't like? They stoned them, they killed them. What'd they do to Jesus Christ who said things they didn't like? They had him crucified. This is what they do. And the funny thing is, or the interesting thing, or the ironic thing is, and Michael heard this, 'cause I gave it, I said this in my speech, at our, at our event a few weeks, a couple weeks ago.↗

2:47:28Speaker 13They didn't just kill the prophets in the Old Testament, then they redacted the Old Testament and didn't include that information, 'cause Christ in the New Testament says, "You killed the prophets. You stoned them who I sent unto you." Them, meaning plural. But if you go to the Old Testament, there's Meaning, all the other guys that they stoned to death, they just edited that out of the book. So first they censored 'em by killing 'em,↗

2:47:55Speaker 13then they censored the record so you don't get to read about how they killed 'em. Sam, I have↗

2:48:01@malleusigthe, the name of that, Meta official. Her name is Jordana Cutler, and here is the direct quote.↗

2:48:08Speaker 15I'm living out the Zionist dream. I have been at Meta for almost nine years. We banned content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media.↗

2:48:20Speaker 16Like what? Wait,↗

2:48:20@malleusigwait, wait.↗

2:48:23Speaker 16Say that again.↗

2:48:26Speaker 16But slow.↗

2:48:29@malleusigGo ahead.↗

2:48:32Speaker 13play that one more time for everybody. Turn it up and play it one more time for everybody. Sure thing, one second.↗

2:48:38Speaker 15I am living out the Zionist dream. I have been at Meta for almost nine years. We banned content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media.↗

2:48:48Speaker 15The Zionist↗

2:48:49@joann_mariedream.↗

2:48:50@malleusigSo we can--↗

2:48:51Ian MalcolmThe Zionist dream. We've told everyone that we control nothing. We have, we have silenced all of them and removed all of their tongues. They no longer have fingers. They can't pipe anything. They can only say that we have no power and authority. It's all so insane.↗

2:49:06@malleusigWe literally silenced everyone who said we have any control over the media, like Israel statement. It's absolutely insane.↗

2:49:15Speaker 13A-and here's why it's important. I'm gonna bring this back to assassination, because really, Jewish censorship is their fallback position. They'd rather just kill you and remove you from the chessboard. And we've seen that in Gaza, they've killed, assassinated over two hundred and fifty journalists in Gaza. Now they're doing that in southern Lebanon, they're killing journalists in southern Lebanon. They've literally set world records for dead journalists in Gaza since October seventh. World records, over two hundred and fifty journalists killed and assassinated.↗

2:49:44Speaker 13we see, we see, Rafat Alarir, the Palestinian academic, who mocked, Israeli atrocity propaganda. There was that atrocity propaganda of a dead baby in an oven, and he mocked that because it was an obvious lie, and it has been since debunked, it was debunked as a lie. But the Jews didn't like that, and Bari Weiss, the Jewish spy who runs CBS News now, basically painted a target on his back and called him out for it. And he said, and he started, getting harassed the IDF was harassing him, and he tweeted out, he said, "Look, if something happens to me or my family, I'm holding, Bari Weiss and the, and her likes responsible." And shortly thereafter, yeah, they assassinated him. They killed him. And then people like Haya Rachik, who is libs of TikTok, the Chabadnik Jew, and other people like her, celebrated his death on the timeline.↗

2:50:38Speaker 13So really, and there are many, many examples of this, they would just assume kill you, but if they can't kill you, if they can't get away with that, then they'll just censor you or cancel you, right? But rather, they just rather take you out altogether, assassination. Censorship is just their fallback position, and that's why I cite that example from the Old Testament. First, they killed the prophets, then they censored the record so it wouldn't mention that they killed the prophets. And that's their order of operations. They'll kill you, and if they can't get away with killing you, then they'll censor you. That's, that's the bit, censorship is Jewish. Comes from the ADL, the SPLC,↗

2:51:15Speaker 13Jordana Cutler, you know, the head of TikTok now is a, is a Jew who talks about, banning any content that speaks negatively of Zionism, you know? And the new head, go ahead.↗

2:51:29Speaker 16Do you remember, the founder of the, American Nazi Party, Dennis, was it Dennis Burroughs? Remember when, New York Times it came out and showed that he was, he was a Jew. Yeah, he was a Jew, and he killed, he killed himself the day after. You know, and then the Jews, like, the original ADL then, and the other two groups, they really like went hard against, you know, the, you know, the white nationalist movement, you know, the ones that were extremely against the Jews. I mean,↗

2:51:59Speaker 16Like, you know, we were like, just, just noticing was, was, was crazy, you know? Like, and they, they went, they went ball to the wall to, to infiltrate and to basically do what they're doing now, turn movements against each other and divide and, you know, just buy people out, you know, these sh- greedy Shabbos goys, you know, for always taking the shekels, you know, for, to, to do their freaking dirty work. It's an interesting,↗

2:52:20Speaker 13it is an interesting evolution because in↗

2:52:25Speaker 13nineteen↗

2:52:26Speaker 16thirty-seven, th- I'm gonna go back earlier, it's↗

2:52:29Speaker 13like thirty-seven, thirty-eight, nineteen forty, somewhere around there. They ran a poll, I think it might have been Gallup ran a poll, and the American people were something like eighty percent against, letting in more Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the United States. And Roosevelt and Truman let them in anyway,↗

2:52:50Speaker 13you know? And- So our great, your grandparents or your great grandparents, they were savvy to, or at least more savvy than we, than, than we are, you know, we, collective we, to the problems that come from, from Jews. somehow- You can just↗

2:53:13@malleusigsay white women, Sam, it's okay. What's that? You can just say white women, it's alright.↗

2:53:20Speaker 13And even men, though. Like, like plenty of conservative, look, and that's what I'm, that's what I'm saying, it goes in cycles, because 20 years ago, 20, 25, 30 years ago, like, there weren't even hardly any antisemites. And the antisemites that there were, like, if anybody opposed Israel 30 years ago or 25 years ago, like, nobody hated you, nobody tried to get you fired from your job, you just- You're just kinda weird. Like, what conservative doesn't wanna care? It's, you know, it's like all↗

2:53:51@malleusigthe way over the end of the world. Why do you care so much about Israel?↗

2:53:53Speaker 13Like, nobody really cared. They just laughed at you or thought you were crazy or weird or dumb or stupid or something. Now, of course, it's much more, the stakes are higher, and we're much more, awakened to Jewish power and Jewish infiltration and Jewish subversion in our society. But back then, people weren't, and so they didn't work as hard to But they did in certain occasions. Look at Randy Weaver, Randy Weaver and the Ruby Ridge fiasco in the, in, the early nineties.↗

2:54:24Speaker 16Oh, what do you know? It's, it's officially May fourteenth. Seventy-nine years we've been cursed with this, satanic, Forsaken, blood-sucking, rapist, satanic state called Israel. How, like, God is testing humanity to see how much longer we'll condone and tolerate this evil and wickedness, you know, like, just, you know, we gotta do something, right? Yeah, well, that's what, that's what we're doing. And one more, hold on, let me, let me finish.↗

2:54:49Speaker 13Hold on, yeah, so good, that's a good callback. we should remember that date. Is that today?↗

2:54:57Speaker 16Yeah, it's May 14th. That's 12:05. That's crazy,↗

2:54:59Speaker 13yeah, that's crazy. I was so focused on the space, I forgot about that. But, no, I was, I was talking about Randy Weaver and the Ruby Ridge incident in the early '90s. And Randy Weaver, what precip- what m-m-many of you might not know, what precipitated the whole thing was that he and some of his neighbors, and he was like spearheading this, were thinking about starting an organization to oppose Zog.↗

2:55:28Speaker 13They called it Zog, Zionist occup-occupa-uh, I think they called it Zionist occupational government. And so not Zionist occupied government, Zionist occupational government, they called it Zog. That's why if you've seen the famous picture, Randy Weaver's got "Just Say No to Zog" on his shirt. But what precipitated that whole thing was when he told the federal informant, who was posing as a,↗

2:55:50Speaker 13as a, a friend, like Randy didn't know this guy was a secret, fed. he, he brought this guy into his house and said, "Hey, we're thinking about organizing to oppose ZOG." That's when the federal government leapt quickly into action and started taking action against Randy Weaver, that culminated in the attack at Ruby Ridge that killed his, where the federal agents, killed his wife, his dog, and his, and his son, and a family friend.↗

2:56:19Speaker 13and why? Because he wanted to oppose Jewish power. So there was a case where the federal government, like the, the, the FBI came, the US Marshals came, Bill Barr himself, the Jew, Bill Barr, who presided over Jeffrey Epstein not killing himself, same Bill Barr was Attorney General back then, and he presided over the attack on Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge.↗

2:56:44Speaker 13And what was that all about? It was all about some guys, literally up in the woods in northern Idaho, just wanting to have a place for white people and to oppose the Zionist occupation of the government. And as soon as the government got wind of that They literally brought a, a war to his cabin out in the sticks, out in the boonies, out in the wilderness.↗

2:57:05Speaker 18And on, on that note, I br- I saw, I remember the guy who passed away yesterday, Ibrahim Fox, and ADL started a narrative about white supremacy, white men are the most dangerous at the same time. So this is how it goes about it. He just passed away yesterday, Ibrahim Fox.↗

2:57:21Speaker 22Okay.↗

2:57:22Speaker 18Foxman. Gotcha.↗

2:57:23Speaker 13Gotcha. Yeah, so I mean, that's what Merrick Garland, right? Merrick Garfinkel, the, Attorney General under Joe Biden, the Jewish Attorney General under Joe Biden, said that white supremacy was the greatest threat to the nation. It's the greatest threat. White people are the greatest threat to Jewish supremacy. that's the real truth. That's the funniest↗

2:57:41@malleusigthing I've ever heard. Yeah.↗

2:57:43Speaker 16White, white, white Christian nationalism is the number one threat to Jewish global supremacy. White↗

2:57:47@malleusigpeople are the only thing holding the country together at this point. Can you imagine what would↗

2:57:52Speaker 13happen to the United And it's falling apart.↗

2:57:57@malleusigThey'd be eating each other.↗

2:57:58Speaker 13That's↗

2:57:59Ian Malcolma really great comment, Sam.↗

2:58:01Speaker 13yeah, so, no, it's, it's true though. It's true. But let's, let's get this back on track. save your comments. Actually, we'll go to the last two comments. We're gonna go to TrueMaga, ask your question or make your comment succinctly, and then we'll go to, fuck Israel.↗

2:58:19Speaker 20Yes, sir. Thank you. be real quick, it's probably a stupid question, but, the Federal Reserve, does that have anything to do with, Jewish control over our nation or what? Was that before that or?↗

2:58:37Speaker 13Yeah, and even- No, no,↗

2:58:45Speaker 22Hey, what's up, guys? Yeah, I, I just wanted to comment on, on when, when we're getting into the, the diamond industry. So Cecil Rhodes was, actually funded by the, the Rothschilds bank, right? The, the London arm of the Rothschilds bank and the French arm of the Rothschilds bank. But the guy whose name was, Baite from South Africa. So if you look at the, at the actual foundation of Southern Africa was actually- By the Jewish entity was what structured and built Africa toward that southern part of Africa, and it's been in the control of, of the British, of the, the, the Jews through the British, monarchy And the British Empire, and also the, there's the biggest, one of the biggest scams which Rhodes also perpetrated on Southern Africa is that he had proposed that he was gonna harness power from the greatest waterfall in the world, the Victoria Falls, and he formed a company called as Victoria Falls Transvaal Power Company. That company never ever existed, but it actually traded for many years on the British stock market and made these guys millions of dollars And the company never existed and never ever, f—, produced any, electricity. Yeah. So, roads, I think, people, people, people make money. This is not the↗

3:00:06Speaker 13future. Let the gullible deal with the real world. Isn't that what Jeffrey Epstein said?↗

3:00:11Speaker 22Yep, exactly, exactly. You got it, man. No,↗

3:00:14Speaker 13but let's↗

3:00:14Speaker 22thank you for this. Let's,↗

3:00:16Speaker 13let's move now to, let's go to McKinley, Ian. William McKinley, President of the United States, assassinated September, 1901, at the William McKinley was a proponent of sound money and gold-backed, money, and he had passed, the, what's it called, like the Gold Security Act or something like that in 1900. And it, it basically, again, reaffirmed, you know,↗

3:00:46Speaker 13the gold standard, what a dollar was worth, you know, all that stuff. And so he was a proponent of sound money, he was also a proponent of protectionist tariffs. So you could say, basically, he was America First nationalist. Protectionist tariffs, no income tax, gold backed sound money currency, right? decentralized banking, that's what he was a proponent of. Well↗

3:01:13Speaker 13So then he's assassinated by a gunman named Leon Czolgosz, who was a Polish Jew, okay, Polish Jew. So he's in the, what's called the Temple of Music at the Buffalo Pan American Exposition in Buffalo, New York. He's in a receiving line, and this, this Jewish anarchist, this Polish Jewish anarchist, Leon Czolgosz, goes up to him, shoots him twice in the gut before he's overpowered.↗

3:01:40Speaker 13McKinley actually survives for, I think, eight or nine days and dies of, ends up dying of gangrene. And you guys can go read about, like, there were many medical missteps throughout that entire time. Like, if he'd even had average hospital care for the time, he would've survived. But they didn't have a hospital, they didn't even... What's interesting is that Buffalo back then was the city of lights, because Thomas Edison had wired Buffalo, New York from the Niagara Falls generate electrical generation center for light, and, and the Pan American Ex-Exposition was like wonderfully lit. You can go look at old pictures of this. But for whatever reason, the little makeshift hospital that they had at the exposition where they took him to operate on McKinley after he shot, they didn't have any light. And somebody literally had to stand with something to like reflect sunlight onto him Onto his gut where the surgeons were trying to operate on it in the dark. Crazy. A-a-a-Thomas, and they couldn't find the bullet fragments, they, they sewed him up without retrieving the bullet fragments, so he ended up getting infected and he got gangrene and then died.↗

3:02:46Speaker 13Thomas Edison even sent them an X-ray machine that he had invented, that he had recently invented. He sent them this X-ray machine, and the doctor that was attending, to, President McKinley wouldn't let him use it, so they couldn't find the bullet fragments, and then he died. But this Leon Czolgosz, very interesting, story, Jewish anarchist, he was a friend or an acquaintance or an ally of somebody named Emma Goldman. Okay. Emma Goldman, who was a-↗

3:03:19Speaker 13A, an immigrant from the Russian Empire. She was a Jew from the Russian Empire. Now, again, like we need to situate ourselves. McKinley, gold-backed dollar, sound money, protectionist tariffs, right? So, not internationalism. He's a nationalist. He's an America-first nationalist, wanna protect America. He's not into the international thing, right? and sound money. Well, obviously, who would be the enemy of this? Well, it would be the international bankers. Right? The ruthless cosmopolitan international bankers, like Jacob Schiff and the Rothschilds, right, and the Warburgs, these guys who end up↗

3:03:59Speaker 13just a few, you know, fifteen, sixteen years after that, they fund Leon Trotsky and his Jewish overthrow, Bolshevik overthrow of the Russian Empire in nineteen seventeen. Okay? So McKinley was standing in the way of these guys. Now, there had been The impulse, starting with the panic, the engineered panic of eighteen ninety-three, you might have heard of the Panic of eighteen ninety-three, it was actually engineered. There was another panic in nineteen o seven, that was also engineered. And what these financiers were trying to do was they were trying to crash the economy and create a political environment that w-where they could push for their central bank, for their private central bank, okay, which ended up becoming the Federal Reserve in nineteen thirteen. McKinley stood in the way of that, okay? You stood in the way of that.↗

3:04:48Speaker 13So you have this Polish Jew, Leon Troglash, who is an, an, an associate of the anarchist Jew, or the Jewish anarchist, Emma Goldman, who is an immigrant from the Russian Empire, an agitator.↗

3:05:03@malleusigYo, Ian Malcolm, your dumbass really supported Dan Bilzerian, bro. Oh my God. Okay.↗

3:05:13Speaker 13I don't know, who was that? Who was↗

3:05:15Ian Malcolmthat? Oh, oh, another heckler. here's, here's the funny part, the ironic part. That account, Jo-Anne actually sent a note, should we add this person up? 'Cause we get lots of requests. and we've already had a death threat, so it's reasonable to say, hey, let's, filter people. The funniest part is that that little cock decided to go into the purple pill. Can I have a microphone, please? And,↗

3:05:40Ian MalcolmPity game or empathy game, the appeal to emotion, and then comes in and just interrupts the room. we can definitely talk about that. And Bilzerian, we, we had a twelve hour space about that, one of the biggest things is- This is, this is a,↗

3:05:53Speaker 13this is a space on Jewish assassinations. It's not a- No, ex- exactly.↗

3:05:58Ian MalcolmAnd, and, and the only thing I'd say about that is, isn't it ironic because, we, we had a very large space on that and very few people wanted to come Come in and just interrupt and feel like they're, I don't, I don't know, somehow being productive for their cause. Maybe they're exemplifying the problem with it. But, Sam, back to you. Yeah, I mean, this is, this↗

3:06:20Speaker 13is a football game, we're not playing basketball here. We're talking about Jewish assassination, that's what we're talking, that's what this space is about. If you wanna talk about Bizarion, then go to a Bizarion space. but yeah, so So that's sort of the economic climate. There's a lot of push around the turn of the century for a central bank, big push. They try multiple times to get, a central bank bill passed before they finally accomplish it in nineteen thirteen. That's not the first attempt, there's several attempts. And so there's a lot of pressure, there's a lot of pressure to devalue the dollar, to have, you know, basically a debased currency. That's William Jennings Bryan, you know, don't crucify me on a cross of gold, you know, you You know, get crucifixion on a cross of gold speech, the famous what, he wanted like unlimited silver money and, you know, basically debased currency. That's what these Jews wanted, and these big financiers wanted. And, and McKinley wasn't for that, he was for sound money, sound gold back money, protectionist tariffs, and, and basically a nationalist economic policy, which is counterproductive to Jewish international banking and economic business interests, right?↗

3:07:30Speaker 13And we see that, we see that now, where they're basically just, basically picking our country apart, monetizing everything, and, and squeezing every last drop out of us for their international, Jewish global empire ambitions. McKinley's literally in the way of all that, right? In the way of these guys. So that brings us back to Leon Chagosh, the Jewish, the Polish Jew. assassin. Emma Goldman has, you might wanna ca- call her a, his, a mentor of sorts. He travels from Cleveland to Chicago in June of nineteen o one to meet Emma Goldman. We learn later that there was somebody in Chicago that wanted to meet-- a man in Chicago that wanted to meet him, or that wanted to see him. He went to see some man in Chicago. We never, we never learned who that is, but he admits that under interrogation that there was somebody- Some man in Chicago that wanted to see him. Well, when he goes to Chicago, he's met by a boy with money, who gives him some money. We don't know where the-- who, who supplied him with that money, but he later purchases a revolver. This guy's like a penniless drifter, who doesn't have any money, and, and when he arrives in Chicago to see this man who wants to see him, he's given some money. He's met at the train station and given some money, and he, he buys a revolver with it. Well, he meets↗

3:08:54Speaker 13To my surprise, she allegedly is on her way to Buffalo herself. She's on her way to Buffalo, she's gonna go to Buffalo, but before she gets on the train, she introduces Chol-Gosh to her friend Abraham Isaac. Okay? Abraham Isaac is a media guy, who publishes, a newspaper called Free Society. Okay? And in this Free Society newspaper, Abraham Isaac has just published an article by Emma Goldman. Honoring a guy named, Gaetano Bresci, okay, who assassinate-- who had just assassinated the king of Italy. This, again, this Gaetano Bresci is, is an anarchist who assassinates the king of Italy, and this Ju-- Russian Jewish anarchist Emma Goldman writes a eulogy, basically, an article eulogizing this guy, and her friend Abraham Isaac, this Jewish newspaper publisher, publishes it in his newspaper, Free Society, okay? This is all happening in the summer↗

3:09:55Speaker 13This is who, this is who Cholakish meets with in Chicago, okay? and after the assassination, Emma Goldman praises Cholakish She says in her autobiography that her sympathies were with Chol Ghosh, and she took a lot of heat for this. They actually arrested her early on, like two days after the assassination, they arrested her on suspicion that she was a collaborator. They ended up having to let her go for lack of evidence, but she was arrested and investigated at, at first. But she does say, and famously, she defended Chol Ghosh, and that her sympathies were with him.↗

3:10:35Speaker 13another one of Emma Goldman's friends, another Jew, named Julius Edelson, he was another an- one of these Jewish anarchists running in that same circle. He says that Cholakash was a great man, a true hero. Okay. This group of anarchists that Emma Goldman led, they're, They met in a place called Sacks Cafe on Suffolk Street, on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, okay? That's where they hung out, it was like their world headquarters for their little Jewish anarchy movement.↗

3:11:07Speaker 13And it's the same neighborhood where Trotsky, Leon Trotsky, had recruited a bunch of Jews to go overthrow the Russian czar with, the sh- with ships, With, what's, what was his name? Was it, I'm, I'm forgetting what Schiff's first name. Peter Schiff's grandfather, great-grandfather. Jacob Schiff. Jacob Schiff, the Wall, the Jewish Wall Street banker, is the guy who helped back Leon Trotsky and fund the Bolshevik Revolution, okay? Same neighborhood where Trotsky comes from and recruits, you know, his Jewish Bolshevik collaborators.↗

3:11:43Speaker 13Lower East Side of Manhattan, same neighborhood, that's where Emma Goldman's anarchist movement is centered out of, at Saxe Cafe, same place, same hotbed of revolution, if you will, okay? So in my, in my opinion, Ian, this one's pretty, this one's pretty open and shut. Like, this guy goes and meets with Emma Goldman, travels to Chicago to meet with Emma Goldman, to meet with Abraham, Isaac, these people. another thing about Emma Goldman, her boyfriend, who I think later becomes her husband, but at the time is her boyfriend, his name is, I think Jacob Berkman or something Berkman. He's also Jewish, and he attempts to assassinate the famous industrialist Henry Clay Frick. Some of you may have heard of him, maybe you haven't. He was a, a American industrialist during the Gilded Age, Henry Clay Frick. And her, Emma Goldman's boyfriend shoots him three times and stabs him twice, but he survives. He survives. Rick survives. Berkman goes to jail for like ten years. Emma Goldman, for her participation in another riot,↗

3:12:46Speaker 13she goes to jail for one year. Okay, that's who these people are, literally. A-a-and they're talking about like they advocate rioting and assassination, they openly like advocate this in anarchy, alright? That's who these people are. And they riot about it, they publish articles about it, they carry it out in real life themselves. Ultimately, and this is who Leon Trotsky is meeting with in Chicago right before the assassination, alright? This is who he's courting with, and this is who defends him afterwards, okay?↗

3:13:19Speaker 13Well, ultimately Emma Goldman's denied citizenship in nineteen o eight, and then she's deported back to Russia in nineteen nineteen, where she takes up with the Bolsheviks, and, and, you know, becomes a Bolshevik and helps that whole cause, and then I think she gets involved in the Spanish Civil War later, on the communist side against the Spanish freedom fighters, or the, the, the Christian, separatists, or, or whatever they were called in the Spanish Civil War, but like, she's like one of these Russian Jewish revolutionaries that- Everywhere she goes, she's just like fomenting violence and strife. That's what she does. This is who Leon Chalgash is running around with right before the assassination, and this is who's,↗

3:14:01Speaker 13defending him after the assassination. So, i-i-in my opinion, this one's pretty open and shut. Like, it's, it's, goes down in the history books as lone gunman anarchist Leon Chalgash. But really this looks like the case of a patsy that they send up, that these, this, these Jewish gangsters and anarchists send up to, to, to do the deed, right? And, and they take out McKinley, that installs Theodore Roosevelt, who's actually comes from a, a wealthy business family in New York, who's very friendly with Jews,↗

3:14:34Speaker 13okay? And this basically paves the way for- the ascendancy of Jewish international capital in Wall Street and in the Federal Reserve. So, that's, that's William McKinley. That's the assassination of William McKinley. I encourage you guys all to go read about it, go look into it. But like, I think in-- I think that's, this one's pretty straightforward. I think in hindsight, knowing what all the things we know now, having, a hundred and twenty-five years of assas-- Jewish assassination since then and their patterns and- Their operations and what they've done since then. This one seems like a chip shot. This was a Jewish plot, this was an organized Jewish plot against William McKinley.↗

3:15:20Ian MalcolmIt, it's, it's a tap in, and, the, the curious piece about that is, again, it comes back to the exact same issue, and if we go to Lincoln, we're gonna notice the exact same patterns that we then got after McKinley with Truman when he arguably pushed back, on this power structure and then all of a sudden got, got threatened With assassination attempts, right? It, it's, it's just wild. The monetary system, I mean, th-this was something they were fighting for, and, and you could go all the way back to, I suppose even the founding fathers, right? You could go back to Hamilton, who, had Jewish ancestry or roots.↗

3:15:56Speaker 13Allegedly, I, has that been proven? Has that been proven definitively?↗

3:16:01Ian MalcolmI don't wanna say definitively, but I was gonna say the roots, the, the curious piece about it is from a pop culture, lens Others that pop culture decides to make a Broadway show about one of them, and it's the guy who pushed for the Federal Reserve right off the bat.↗

3:16:17Speaker 13No. No, that's a good point. I'll tell you, I'll give you guys another one besides Hamilton. You've all heard of Benedict Arnold, dirtiest name in American history, right? The traitor to the revolution, betrayed West, tried to betray West Point to the British. Benedict Arnold, that's what a traitor is. You're a Benedict Arnold, right?↗

3:16:35Speaker 13Benedict Arnold's business partners were a fam- an extended family of Jews, and in fact, the quartermaster at West Point, who was in on the scheme with Benedict Arnold, was one of these Jews. I'll bet you all didn't know that. Maybe some of you knew it.↗

3:16:53Ian MalcolmEv-every↗

3:16:54Speaker 13single time. So the greatest traitor in American history, who betrays West Point, tries to betray West Point to the British. Does so at the behest and with the help of his Jewish business partners, who, by the way, are trading with the British and the Americans and double-dealing on both sides.↗

3:17:14Speaker 20Can you throw in the, Titanic a little bit in there? What happened on that? Let me tell you something funny↗

3:17:19Speaker 13about the Titanic. The, the Titanic conspiracy goes like this: John Jacob Astor, richest man in the world, strongest opponent of the central bank, is on the Titanic. Allegedly, I think, Rockefeller or Carnegie or one of these other, or J. P. Morgan is allegedly supposed to be on the, on, on the voyage. He pulls out at the last minute, and John Jacob Astor and I, I think, another one of, a Guggenheim perhaps is left on the Titanic voyage, and of course, it hits an iceberg and sinks, and they die, and the biggest opposition of the Federal Reserve is now taken out. And, and there's like a book, there was like a book that was↗

3:17:59Speaker 13Predicts the exact Titanic disaster, right? Like even the name of the boats, like the same or close to the same, hits an iceberg and sinks and everybody dies, and that's literally what happened.↗

3:18:09@joann_marieAnd also apparently the Olympic, they had like two, two ships, the Olympic and the Titanic, and the Olympic was the one who-- I think↗

3:18:17Speaker 13that's been debunked though, since they've gotten the high resolution, oh, it has, has, I, I think so. Again, go do your own research, but I think that the, there was a conspiracy that the, that the boat that sank wasn't actually the, the Titanic, but the sister ship, the Olympic, that had been like damaged in a fire or something like that. But I think from underwater, the newest, newer underwater high-resolution photos and scans, they've been able to establish that it was in fact the Titanic, not the Olympic. But I could be wrong about that. Go do your own research. Well,↗

3:18:45Ian Malcolmand, and Sam, the, the, the book, the, "The Wreck of the Titan," from 1898, where a boat defined in the book as the unsinkable ship, the Titan, strikes an iceberg and then depicts the sinking of the vessel in the book. It is kind of, it's kinda eerie.↗

3:19:09Ian MalcolmSo somebody writes the book of the Titan and, the unsinkable Titan, and then they have history play out the way it does, and then they make the James Cameron movie, and they have Leonardo DiCaprio just kind of play along with the story that they've shared. So history begot, what, what is it, literature begot reality, which begot literature. How about that?↗

3:19:30Speaker 20Yeah. So before 1917, we weren't Under anybody's control, in your opinion, or besides British, I guess?↗

3:19:39Ian MalcolmThat is a much longer conversation. Sam, are you there?↗

3:19:46Speaker 20Oh, yeah, 1913, right, yeah.↗

3:19:50Ian MalcolmI think Sam might be having some issues.↗

3:19:54Speaker 16And one, one thing I also wanted to throw in there too, for the, for the audience, who may not know, Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik Jew, leader of the Bolshevik Revolution, his great-granddaughter Nora Volkow is the director of the National Institute of Drug Abuse in America, and she's been the incumbent since 2003. Oh, she's been there since the Bush administration. Obama, like, she's been there since 2003. Her headquarters is 45 minutes away from, from where I live in Maryland. And↗

3:20:24Speaker 21yeah,↗

3:20:25Speaker 16like you know, so.↗

3:20:27Speaker 21Yeah, go figure.↗

3:20:30Speaker 20Yeah, the reason I say British controls because, like, You know, like the founding fathers had to come from somewhere, and fifty percent were lawyers, so where did they, where did they get their law degree, right? So, I guess we were under British control at that time.↗

3:20:50@joann_marieI think Sam needs to be, oh, never mind, back. Sam, are you back? Yeah, I↗

3:20:54Ian Malcolmthink, I think hopefully that's working.↗

3:20:58Speaker 13Like three times. Didn't wanna, didn't wanna let me on. The,↗

3:21:02Ian Malcolmthe tit- they weren't liking the, the fiction begets fact, begets fiction, reality around the, the, the Titanic, which it, it feels like a microcosm for the entire world that we're living in. You know↗

3:21:12Speaker 13what's funny? I learned this recently. This is, and this is really odd, but Or funny, I guess, or ironic, whatever you wanna call it. So, the Titanic sank because it sideswiped this iceberg, okay? And the Titanic had a bunch, a series of watertight compartments that if, that was designed such that if any four of them fa-failed, the boat would still float. Like it could, it could lose up to four watertight compartments in the hull, right? They're like essentially big compartmentalized tanks in the hull. And like, so, like if a-if the hull gets punctured somewhere↗

3:21:48Speaker 13It's gonna get punctured in a certain section of the hull, and they can section off that portion of the hull, close off these watertight doors, and the boat will still float. Well, the Titanic is designed that you can puncture or destroy or fill up at least four of these huge watertight compartments, and the boat will still float. The problem is, is when it sideswipes this iceberg, it, it, it leaves this series of tears along the side of the hull. Some of them are as small as like a piece of paper or smaller. Okay.↗

3:22:16Speaker 13And not real big, many of them not real big, but one of them, about the size, I guess, yeah, maybe about the size of a piece of paper, is torn in the fifth watertight, so it's, it tears along the side, tears through four watertight compartments, and then just barely into the fifth, which is why it took so long for the boat to, like, sink and capsize, because the, the leak into the fifth watertight compartment was so small.↗

3:22:42Speaker 13But that's what happened, and then, then it sinks. Here's the ironic thing, Ian, if the Titanic had steered directly into the iceberg and impacted the iceberg, even at full speed, head on, it wouldn't have sunk. It would have collapsed the bow And destroyed like the front one or two or three watertight compartments, and the boat still would have floated. It was because they turned and sideswiped it that it ended up sinking. They could have impacted it head on and stayed afloat. And I just thought that was a,↗

3:23:14Speaker 13an ironic piece of history or, an ironic, I don't know, event, a situation, because sort of like how the Jew comes at you. Doesn't come at you. The Jew doesn't come at you head on, comes at you from the side. Pokes a, and po- it's like a little rabbi in your boat, like drilling holes, holes in your boat, you know?↗

3:23:31Ian MalcolmAnd, and even, even if you dodge, and he gets ever, ever, ever, ever, over time, it's like- Plus, it's an↗

3:23:34Speaker 13iceberg. It's right,↗

3:23:35Ian Malcolmover time. That's right. So the berg here,↗

3:23:37Speaker 13the berg came, sideswiped him. The, the berg- And like just punched a bunch of little holes in the side, you know? Then come at him straight on, you know? It's like the↗

3:23:56Speaker 19Every steamed iceberg time with. There↗

3:23:59Speaker 13it is. There it is. So I don't know, like, the, the Titanic conspiracy is very tantalizing, but if you start looking into it, like, it's one of those things where it's easy to see the conspiracy, but when you look at all the details, it's also easy to not see a conspiracy, you know? So I'm like fifty-fifty on that one.↗

3:24:20Ian MalcolmMyself? Well, and, and that's, that's, it, it back to, to harken the comment from the beginning of the space, Sam. You know, everybody should do their own research. the, these are all theories, theses. there are a strange recurring pattern behind them. but Tim Lourdan put into the purple pill, he said that he read online that there were Israeli art students on the Titanic. Sam, did, did you hear about that one?↗

3:24:45Speaker 13it's the first I've heard of that one, but, you know, nothing shocks me anymore. But it's, it's for anybody who doesn't know, that's a reference to 9/11, right? The Israeli art student. I↗

3:24:53Ian Malcolmthought, I thought, Leonardo DiCaprio's character was a art student from Israel when he painted the woman. Is that not what that was a reference to? I must be missing something.↗

3:25:02Speaker 13Right? There wasn't room, why wasn't there room for him on that, on that piece of, on that door where he was↗

3:25:08Ian Malcolmfloating on? I'll never let go. Oh, you're dead. Okay, goodbye.↗

3:25:13Speaker 13Like, and then she like, and, you know, and then when she dies and goes to Titanic or hea- she goes to heaven, she, does she go, does she go meet up with her husband of the last eighty years or whatever? You know, no, she goes and meets up with the fling she had for a day and a half on the Titanic. That's heaven. Heaven is your, is your body count, not, not your, not your husband. Okay. Okay.↗

3:25:37Speaker 20Sure. And AI says, "Um, the Federal Reserve was..." Claims that the Federal Reserve was created by specific ethnic or religious groups, such as Jewish bankers, are often rooted in conspiracy theories with no factual basis.↗

3:25:57Speaker 13Yeah, I mean, literally Jewish international bankers, helped organize the Federal Reserve, literally helped do it, literally involved. You can, there's a famous article, I think, in Haaretz or The Forward or Jewish Telegraph Agency, I think it's The Forward, where they talk about, like, the headline something like, "The Jewish Role in the Federal Reserve," you know? And several of the, several of the,↗

3:26:18Speaker 13Federal Reserve chairman Have been Jews, and you know what, that actually brings us to the next assassination, the next assassination, Ian. We, we need to cover this assassination. Eugene Meyer was the Jewish head of the Federal Reserve, the fifth, I believe, the fifth head of the Federal Reserve in the nineteen thirties, okay? Eugene Meyer. He buys up a little company called the Washington Post in the nineteen thirties, okay? Later on, he becomes the first president of the World Bank after World War II. So that's who Eugene Meyers. He's a super powerful global Jew, right? Head of the Federal Reserve, head of the World Bank, owner of the Washington Post. That's Eugene Meyer. Probably a member of B'nai B'rith and who knows what, who knows what else, other- Jewish organizations. His daughter, Catherine Meyer, marries a Protestant American named Phil Graham.↗

3:27:14Speaker 13Phil Graham was a member of the OSS, the Office of Strategic Services, forerunner of the CIA in World War II. That's Phil Graham, intelligence operative. Marries Eugene Meyers, the, the president of the World Bank, marries his daughter, Catherine Meyer. She becomes Katherine Meyer Graham.↗

3:27:36Speaker 13Eugene Meyer gives 70%, I believe it's 70% of the stock in the Washington Post, leaves 70% of the stock to Phil Graham, his son-in-law, and 30% to his daughter, Katherine. I, I've never, I've never been able to figure out why that is, why he left the majority of the company to his son, but his company was the president of the Washington Post and was running the Washington Post, so maybe that's why, because his son, or his son-in-law, Phil Graham, actually knew Knew how to run the business, Katherine didn't know how to run the business. She didn't know anything about it.↗

3:28:06Speaker 13Anyway, so he dies in like 1957, and Bill Graham becomes the owner of the Washington Post. Bill Graham is part of an organization of people in DC called the Georgetown Set. It's this neighborhood group, this extended neighborhood group of intellectuals and powerful, connected people. John F. Kennedy's a part of it. Phil Graham's a part of it,↗

3:28:32Speaker 13other people are a part of it. Phil Graham becomes a close personal friend to JFK. Very close personal friend. Another,↗

3:28:47Speaker 13so, so this is, so that's introducing Phil Graham, head of the Washington Post, Gentile, own, majority owner of the Washington Post, his wife, Katherine. Meier Graham is the minority owner. In August, 1963, August 5th, I believe. I think it's August 5th, might be the 6th. 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, somewhere around there. Bill Graham has been mired in, in an extramarital affair↗

3:29:19Speaker 13with a gentile, and he was going to divorce his wife, and- Take up with his gentile girlfriend.↗

3:29:32Speaker 13Allegedly he'd also was like bipolar or something and having mood swings.↗

3:29:40Speaker 13He allegedly kills himself, shoots himself with a shotgun in the bathroom on vacation. He and his wife Catherine go on vacation, like their ranch house somewhere on some family land or whatever. Allegedly she's upstairs taking a nap. She's upstairs taking a nap, and he decides, "You know what, my life sucks, I'm gonna go kill myself." And he like walks down to the first floor bathroom, sets a shot-shotgun up in the corner, props it up in the corner, shoots himself, and falls into the bathtub,↗

3:30:10Speaker 13committing suicide.↗

3:30:13Speaker 13Now, what's happened to this previously? Here's what's happened previously. In January of 1963, Bill Graham to a meeting of the National Newspaper Organization, something or other. Basically, it's a national convention of newspaper publishers. He gets up in this, allegedly in a drunken rant at this national conference, and basically spills the beans to all the, like, major newspaper publishers in America that JFK is having an affair with a woman named Mary Pinchot Meyer,↗

3:30:45Speaker 13who is the wife of, or the ex-wife of, Cord Meyer, a C-- a high-ranking CIA, a CIA officer, or a CIA administrator, bureaucrat. Cord Meyer, you can go look this up. She's no longer married to Cord Meyer, she's divorced from him, and JFK is having an affair with her. In fact, they met over thirty times, they had something like thirty-one trysts or over thirty-one, sexual meetups, hookups. JFK and, and Mary Pinchot Meyer. Anyway, she's also part of this Georgetown set, this, this group of, DC elites, if you will.↗

3:31:25Speaker 13And Phil Graham spills the beans to literally every newspaper publisher in the nation about this extramarital affair that JFK is having. They put Phil Graham, literally, they put him in a straitjacket and fly him back home and commit him to a hospital for like mental observation. And give him drugs and stuff. And what I want you to think of is Harley Pasternak and Kanye West. When Kanye West had his DeathCon three tweet, you know, I'm gonna go DeathCon three on the Jews or whatever, and Elon nuked him off of Twitter, and the Jewish fitness guru of Hollywood, Harley Pasternak, basically threatened to have him committed and take away his kids. You guys remember that?↗

3:32:11Speaker 13Of course. And I, I think this swept up Britney Spears as well, 'cause I think he was associated with her. Anyway, they have handlers. These people have handlers, and they use the threat of institutionalization or drugs or whatever it is, and this is re-reminiscent of that. They, you know, he spills the beans, and they put him in a straitjacket, they, they commit him into this hospital, they give him drugs, they say he's crazy, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Anyway, apparently he's on the road to recovery or not,↗

3:32:43Speaker 13August, he commits this suicide that I tell you about. Well, here's the thing about Mary Pinchot Meyer, there's a couple assassinations going on here, so I'm gonna kinda tell you two, two stories in parallel, and hopefully we got a high enough IQ audience here to sort of follow along, but I'll do my best. Mary Pinchot Meyer ends up, she, she's like really into marijuana And allegedly she's even done LSD with Timothy Leary, the famous, you know, Harvard drug guru guy, Timothy Leary. He says that he did LSD with Mary Pinchot Meyer, and I believe he also says she did drugs with JFK.↗

3:33:18Speaker 13And they used, apparently, allegedly, JFK would, they would, he would spend hours with this Mary Pinchot Meyer. They would smoke marijuana, they would do drugs, they'd get relaxed, and they'd discuss wor- they would discuss world events. He was very concerned about nuclear proliferation. Turns out Mary Pinchot Meyer, this woman that JFK was having an affair with, is very concerned about Cuba and nuclear weapons, and he has, he said, or it's said that↗

3:33:47Speaker 13Out of all the people, like the, that he talked to or whose opinion he valued, hers was one of the opinions that he valued the most. This is like one of these people that he really valued her opinion. obviously he valued other things about her as well, so you can be the judge as to how much of it was her opinion that he valued and how much it was her other things that he valued. But,↗

3:34:09Speaker 13But anyway, they spent many hours, in many meetings, dozens of meetings, talking, long hours just talking and doing drugs and talking about nuclear proliferation and things. And so it's my assertion, it's my guess that what- That whole fight that JFK was having with David Ben-Gurion against Israel getting nuclear weapons, and in fact, one of the major themes of JFK's presidency was nuclear non-proliferation. We talked about this earlier in the space, how at that point in time, there were only five nuclear powers in the world, and the, the dream of denuclearizing the world, getting rid of the world nuc-- the world's nuclear arsenal, was actually A plausible, achievable vision, because at that point in time, only the Soviet Union, China, the United States, France, and the UK had nuclear weapons, and you had the United States, UK, and France on one side, and you had the Soviet Union and China on the other side. And,↗

3:35:11Speaker 13Kennedy was actually making inroads, he was making progress with the Russians. And they were on the road towards, like, peace deals and perhaps like, a freeze on nuclear proliferation. And his vision was to completely get rid of nuclear weapons, because he did, he said, he thought that they were just too dangerous for the future of the world. He didn't wanna-- He didn't want a world where nuclear weapons are running rampant. He just saw that as, as a terrible thing. And so that was one of the reasons why he was working with the Soviet Union to denuclearize. That's one of the reasons he was engaged in this long,↗

3:35:43Speaker 13pro It turns out that his girlfriend on this side piece, this whole time, that was like one of her big, that was like one of her big things, was like nuclear proliferation and the threat of nuclear war. This was like something really important to her to stop. And so it's like, how much of that was JFK and how much of it was the side piece that he was talking through him? I don't know. It's really interesting, you should go look into it. But here's the other thing, Mary Pinchot Meyer kept a detailed journal of her entire time, her entire affair with JFK↗

3:36:16Speaker 13Well, anyway, so Phil Meyer, the head of the Washington Post, close friend of JFK, by the way, very close friend of JFK, then all of a sudden commits suicide in August of 1963, just three months before the assassination of JFK. And his wife, the Jew, Katherine Meyer Graham, becomes the head of the Washington Post.↗

3:36:41Speaker 13Years later She and her reporters will lead the coup against Richard Nixon, getting Richard Nixon replaced with Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller. Gerald Ford, who was a lackey on the Warren Commission, covering up Israel's assassination of JFK, and Nelson Rockefeller, who's being blackmailed by the Mossad. We now know↗

3:37:09Speaker 13Rockefeller is being blackmailed by the Mossad. We should also mention, well, put a bookmark there, 'cause we're gonna come back to this. I'm gonna come back to this. I was gonna say, when you↗

3:37:17Ian Malcolmsaid that, my ears really perked up on that one.↗

3:37:20Speaker 13We're gonna come back to that, because there's a lot to be told there. We're gonna come back to Nixon, Rockefeller, Gerald Ford, Spiro Agnew, we're gonna come back to that. So put a big bookmark there, okay? But Katherine Graham, The Washington Post, Woodward and Bernstein, Carl Bernstein, The Jewish Reporter. Bob Woodward, Naval Intelligence, CIA,↗

3:37:43Speaker 13Catherine Graham, head of the Washington Post, they're the ones that basically orchestrate the takedown, or help orchestrate the takedown of Richard Nixon. Okay? That's what's gonna happen in the future after this. But right now, we're back in August 1963, three months before the assassination of JFK, and two months after David Ben-Gurion's sudden resignation. 'Cause what happened is Kennedy and Ben Gurion are having, they're sending these letters and phone calls back and forth, fighting over JFK's pushing for inspections of Israel's nuclear programs, trying to keep them from getting nuclear weapons, and of course, Ben Gurion wants nuclear weapons. So their negotiations, their talks have progressed to the point where Kennedy, on June 15th, 1963, sends an ultimatum. They-- an ultimatum. Ultimatum. You guys know what an ultimatum is. This is the last, this is it. This is the last straw. Sends an ultimatum to David Ben Gurion on June 15th, 1963. Ben Gurion abruptly resigns on June 15th, 1963. At the time, he didn't say why, and nobody knew why. And we still officially don't know why. It's never been said. But you can go back and find the old article in the Jewish Telegraph Agency, JTA. You can go find that old article, I have it, where Ben Gurion suddenly resigns. And Levi Eshkol becomes the, the, the new prime minister, and the negotiations have to start over. You get a new prime minister, okay, we gotta sort of like reset the clock, and the negotiations over the nuclear program start over, right? And this buys Israel time.↗

3:39:19Speaker 13So two months after Ben Gurion resigns, and, and he resigns so that he doesn't have to receive the ultimatum, the telegram, the ultimatum from JFK. That's why he resigns, just to spell it out for you guys. He resigns so that he doesn't have to accept this telegram and be accountable, and Israel doesn't have to be accountable for this ultimatum. He just like, kind of like, lets the telegram die, right? And resigns.↗

3:39:43Speaker 13That's what was happening. So two months after that, and three months before the assassination of JFK, Phil Gramm, publisher of the Washington Post, super close friend with JFK, knowledgeable about the extramarital affair with Geri Pincho Meyer, and their discussions probably about denuclearizing, just decides to commit suicide with mental anguish while his wife is taking a nap upstairs.↗

3:40:12Speaker 13Okay.↗

3:40:15Speaker 13Shoots himself in the bathroom, falls over in the bathtub. How convenient. So, I'm a suspicious motherfucker. And I'm seeing a guy who probably knows about the nuclear negotiations going on with Israel. I'm seeing a guy who's running one of the biggest newspapers in the country, in DC, close friends with JFK And who isn't going to, and who's going to investigate the assassination of his buddy, with all of his powers, right? Think Candace Owens, think what Candace Owens is doing for Charlie Kirk right now. Alright, that's Phil Gramm. That's Phil Gramm, head of the Washington Post, tight buddies with JFK. They're gonna take JFK out and let Phil Gramm do his Washington Post investigative journalism thing? I don't think so.↗

3:41:04Speaker 13I don't think so. I don't think so. So then take him out. That's Bill Graham. Then his Jewish wife takes over, now the Jews have captured the Washington Post. When, right up until that point, it was looking like he was gonna divorce her and marry this other Gentile lady. And now the Washington Post is in the hands of Gentiles and is in a position to investigate the JFK assassination in good faith.↗

3:41:30Speaker 13Can't have that. So- Did they even give him a chance? Did he say no? you know, did he balk at the, the cabal's plan, or did he just know too much, or did they suspect that he was gonna be a problem? I don't know, but they took him out. I'm sorry, but they took him out. That was a preemptive takedown.↗

3:41:52Speaker 13Now, Mary Pinchot Meyer, the woman who JFK was sleeping with. As late as October, 1963, JFK was still sending her overtures. Totally in love with this woman, okay? She was living in DC with her sister and brother-in-law, Ben Bradley. Ben Bradley, her brother-in-law, worked at the Washington Post, and she lived in their guest house out back. And again, I tell you, I told you she kept this journal, this diary of her time with JFK. Well,↗

3:42:20Speaker 13somehow the information gets out that she's got this journal, this diary, and a year later, in August, in August 1964, so this is a year after Phil Gramm is assassinated. And it's, what, nine months after JFK is assassinated, in August of '64, Mary Pinchot Meyer is killed in a, she's out for a walk, she's out for a walk like Seth Rich style, you guys know Seth Rich, the guy who gets killed allegedly, you know, in a holdup?↗

3:42:48Speaker 13That's Mary Pinchot Meyer. She's out for a walk one day, stroll, and a witness hears two gunshots, and they go running, and it's Mary Pinchot Meyer, she's been killed by a random mugga- Random mugg And Ben Bradley reports going home that day. And guess- Hey Sam, can I↗

3:43:08Speaker 17ask a question real quick?↗

3:43:10Speaker 13Yeah, yeah, yeah.↗

3:43:11Speaker 17What, what are the odds that, that she might have been a spy of, of any sorts?↗

3:43:19Speaker 13Like, look, a spy, I don't know, but she could have been somebody that could be compromised. Now she's somebody who was sleeping with the president, had a diary, and so like if you can get leverage on her or something, I mean, now you can get valuable information. So she's, I mean, she's a liability, she's a liability at the very↗

3:43:37Speaker 17least. Right. I, I asked this because that, that's a That's a very Jewish scenario. You're thinking honey pot.↗

3:43:42Speaker 13You're thinking honey pot. You're thinking honey pot. Now, the honey pot here is probably Marilyn Monroe, who married the playwright Arthur Miller, who was Jewish, and she converted to Judaism, and then she has a fling and a tryst with JFK, right? so Marilyn Monroe, maybe there's more than one honey pot, but if you're looking for a honey pot in this situation, it's probably Marilyn Monroe.↗

3:44:05Speaker 13and we haven't talked about her tonight, but there's what Marilyn- The, the only reason I asked 'cause this all takes place↗

3:44:10Speaker 17during the, the time of the negotiations of, of, of, with, with Israel. So correct,↗

3:44:17Speaker 13correct. So↗

3:44:18Speaker 17that, that, that's why I was asking like maybe they'd read something or compromised or something. Well,↗

3:44:23Speaker 13I don't think she, I don't think she was a spy. I think she knew about the negotiations and was a loose end. Yeah. That's what I think, because she's pushing, she was, it was really important to her to, like, to have a non-nuclear world. She was really against nuclear war, nuclear proliferation. And so I'm like, how much of Kennedy's anti-nuclear beliefs were his, and how much were they his girlfriend? Girlfriends that he was getting them from, you know? I don't know. go look into that yourselves, make, draw your own conclusions. That's, that's an interesting question, but I think at the very least she knew about the negotiations. She knew about the trouble, she knew about Israel's nuclear programs, and I think he talked openly to her about it, that's my hypothesis, or they were afraid that he had, and, and that it would, might be in the diary.↗

3:45:12Speaker 13And that she might have known something, so they kill her. So the day she's killed, her brother-in-law, Ben Bradley, comes home, 'cause remember she's living in their guest house, she's living in the guest house of her sister and brother-in-law, Ben Bradley, who works for the Washington Post. Ben Bradley reports that he comes home that day, the night that she's killed, and James Jesus Angleton, the, the director of CIA counterintelligence, is at the guest house jimmying the lock trying to break in.↗

3:45:39Speaker 13I shit you not. That's what happened. James Angleton, the head of CIA counterintelligence, the guy who set up Lee Harvey Oswald, the guy who set up JFK for the Israelis, the guy who was Israel's guy inside the CIA, the guy who presided over the theft of our nuclear secrets and nuclear materials throughout the 1960s, that James Jesus Angleton, that same James Angleton, is trying to get in the guest house and get Mary Pinchot's diary, the same day that she's killed out for a-↗

3:46:15Speaker 13He takes the diary and it's later reported that he burns the diary at CIA, at, at CIA headquarters or at his house or something. He, he gets the diary and, and, and later burns it. What was in that diary?↗

3:46:30Speaker 13Who was he working for?↗

3:46:35Speaker 20You with me? Gotta be the man in black.↗

3:46:38@joann_marieThis is insane. I'm,↗

3:46:40Speaker 20I'm gonna say it's,↗

3:46:42Speaker 17it's every single time.↗

3:46:45Speaker 13Every single fucking time. Now, now let's go back to that Watergate bookmark. We're gonna come back to that Watergate bookmark now. So LBJ, we're gonna get, we're, now we're gonna start rowing to the bookmark. We're not gonna go directly to the bookmark, we're gonna, we have to row there first. So LBJ becomes president, he lets, Israel nuclearize and get the bomb, then of course, Israel spends the 1960s under his auspices and Angleton's auspices stealing our nuclear material from Apollo, you know, nuclear facility.↗

3:47:17Speaker 13under Salman Shapiro, right, the whole NUMEC, you know, Apollo affair, that happens. Or we also transfer nuclear technology to them. And that's something that came out in the, the latest JFK files released last year, that Angleton testifies to Congress off the record about, like, how did Israel get these nuclear secrets? And then they go off the record, right? Well, it's 'cause Angleton probably gave them these secretory-- he let them take them, right? 'Cause he's the The head of CIA counterintelligence, and he allows this to happen.↗

3:47:51Speaker 13So, so, LBJ reverses all of JFK's policies. He lets Israel nuclearize. He, drops Palestinian right of return. He drops the effort to register APAC under FARA. he, JFK had been like withholding military aid to Israel. Most of the aid that JFK had been giving Israel had, had been humanitarian, some defensive armaments, but very little, because he didn't-- because JFK didn't want to ignite an arms race in the Middle East.↗

3:48:27Speaker 13LBJ just tore that band-aid off, okay? He started sending bigger, de-defensive armaments, offensive weaponry, missiles, F5, you know, F5s, tanks, all kinds of shit. Increased the amount of aid and, and, and it became military aid instead of humanitarian aid, all that stuff. And then, of course, the, another big reversal is he escalated in Vietnam instead of de-escalating, like, which is what JFK was doing, right? Well, come 1968, LBJ- HBJ was tremendously unpopular, and by the way, he spent the middle of the '60s passing the Jewish civil rights agenda. Okay? Now, you might agree with the civil rights, era, agenda or disagree with it, but it was Jewish, okay? So whether you agree or disagree, it was Jewish. All right? It was Jewish led, it was Jewish funded, it was Jewish organized, okay? The, the, you know, there's a bunch of Jews and Jewish money behind Martin Luther King and the Southern Christian Law Conference or Southern, the SCLC.↗

3:49:24Speaker 13And a bunch of other organizations, the American Jewish Congress, the ADL, the ACLU, the NAACP, all these organizations are all thoroughly Jewish, founded by Jews, funded by Jews, staffed by Jews, lawyered by Jews. you had all the bills in Congress being pushed by Jews, Jacob Javits, Emanuel Seller, the Civil Rights Act of '64, the Voting Rights Act of '65, the Hart-Seller Immigration Act of 1965, the Fair Housing Act of 1968. All of these civil rights, laws that They're being systematically gutted by Jews and Jewish organizations and Jewish lawyers and Jewish litigation at the Supreme Court, all sorts of things, okay? And LBJ is like, is like helping them do this, and he's signing all the bills and he's encouraging it all to happen. So, so, so LBJ is basically giving the left-wing Jews everything they want. All these communist, Bolshevik, you know, Democrat, leftist Jews, he's given them all their civil rights, he's given all the Zionist Jews everything they want in Israel, everything, you know, covering up the USS Liberty attack, everything, right? Covering up the assassinations, all of that stuff. From 1968, he, he's immensely unpopular. He's, the, the Vietnam War has made him immensely unpopular. And↗

3:50:39Speaker 13He decides he's not gonna run for office again in 1968. Richard Nixon run, Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew, run in 1968 on the Republican ticket, and they win big. Of course, before that happens, RFK is taken out, assassinated by the Jews, and so is Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King, we haven't covered tonight, briefly, they take him out as a way to, prolong the Vietnam War because he came out formally against the Vietnam War, and he had an entire national organization that he was organizing against the Vietnam War. That was a big reason they took him out. The other reason is, is because they needed the Fair Housing Act. And the Fair Hou- what the Fair Housing Act did is it made it illegal for white people to protect their private property. It made it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race or national origin in matters of real estate, like buying, selling, renting, bank loans, all that stuff. Up until that point in time, white America remained largely white because they could keep black people out of it by not renting to them, by not selling to them, and by not giving loans to them, by essentially being able to dispose of their private property the way they saw fit. And, for the Jewish plan to multiculturalize America to work, they had to get rid of that. They had to get rid of the ability for white people to have their own spaces and their own neighborhoods. And so they passed the Fair Housing Act in 1968, on the heels of the assassination of Martin Luther King. What you don't know, maybe, is they tried to pass the Fair Housing Act in 1966, and it failed. They tried to pass it in 1967, and it failed. Then they tried to pass it again at the beginning of↗

3:52:17Speaker 13And then the civil rights era was basically dead, it was over. There was no momentum left, it was over, they had nowhere to go, it had failed. Like, yeah, they'd integrated public parks and public spaces and places of employment, okay, but they hadn't integrated America's neighborhoods. America's neighborhoods were all still like a white monolith, no multiculturalism, no integration. And it would have stayed that way in perpetuity. If they hadn't been able to overturn it, and, and, but they couldn't overturn it. The Fair Housing Act was supposed to overturn it, was supposed to outlaw that, but it failed three straight times. What happened is after the assassination of Martin Luther King, riots erupted in a hundred cities around the country, and that put-- and then that put an immense amount of pressure on Congress to do something.↗

3:53:08Speaker 13So just like we started this space for you-- for those of you who came in late. One of the things they did after the JFK assassination was pass his legislative slate, his legislative goals that had failed in previously failed in Congress. The Civil Rights Act of '64, the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of '65, these were bills that JFK had pushed while he was president and had been defeated because they weren't popular. Like the Hart-Celler Immigration Act was opposed by Americans something like two, two and a half to one. They were like two point five to one against opening America's borders. So these weren't popular legislative actions, and so they died in Congress. But after they killed JFK, there was like this groundswell of emotion and sympathy, and there was this national trauma, and they said, "Well, maybe, you know, for John, you know, we should pass this stuff, right?" So they, they exploited his assassination to pass his legislative agenda. That's what made a lot of the civil rights, era bills possible, was this national trauma from the assassination of JFK. Okay, so now we- Fast forward to Martin Luther King. The thing that made the Fair Housing Act of 1968 possible was the assassination of Martin Luther King. Up until that point in time, it was, it had failed three straight times, but after they assassinated Martin Luther King, not only did they remove the main organization-organized opposition to the Vietnam War, but then they also created a national trauma and national groundswell again to pass, to finish passing the civil rights agenda. In six days, so literally six days after they assassinate Martin Luther King, and there's riots, organized riots in a hundred cities across the nation.↗

3:54:49Speaker 13Emanuel Seller reintroduces the Fair Housing Act for a fourth time And at the, at his, and at the urging of LBJ, they rammed through the Fair Housing Act of 1968, and six days it passes, and, and LBJ signs it, signs it in, and that basically is why it's illegal for white people to have our own spaces. So if you guys have heard of Return of the Land and Eric Arbo and these guys trying to have their whites-only space in the Ozarks and Jews are fighting it, it's illegal. It's illegal any, everywhere in America for white people to-- You can have Koreatown and Chinatown↗

3:55:24Speaker 13"brick New Jersey for the Jews or whatever, but white people can't have their own spaces, and it's because of the Fair Housing Act of 1968. That's what integrated America, that's what finally integrated America and overthrew the white monolith. And so then they, they opened America's borders with the Hart-Celler Immigration Act, and then they opened America's neighborhoods to all the immigrants that would be flooding in.↗

3:55:45Speaker 13due to opening the borders, and that's what we see now. So that's why they killed Martin Luther King, his opposition to Vietnam War, and to pass the Fair Housing Act. So that's 1968. By the way, RFK Was also against the Vietnam War, very strongly against the Vietnam War. Okay? He was also running for the presidency so that he could reopen the investigation into his brother's assassination. So then they-- so April 4th, 1968, they take out Martin Luther King. May 1968, by the way,↗

3:56:19Speaker 13the Jews organize, riots in Paris to depose Charles de Gaulle. Who also was op-- in opposition to Israel, and who had, had withdrawn French military to aid Israel. So in May night, so April '68, they, assassinate Martin Luther King. May 1968, they organize riots to, basically get President de Gaulle of France to resign. Also in May '68, they hatch a plot to brainwash a Palestinian to assassinate Yasser Arafat. It ends up failing, but that's hatched in 1968. Then in June '68, they assassinate RFK. 1968 is a massive assassination crime spree, and I think part of the reason is, is because LBJ was so unpopular, and it was already known that he wasn't gonna seek reelection, that they were basically, "Let's just run wild and take out all the opposition we can right now while we got the chance."↗

3:57:14Speaker 13That's my hypothesis. There were other high-profile assassinations in 1968, and other attempted assassinations in '68 besides those, but those were the biggest ones. And I think it was, again, like I said, LBJ was on his way out, and he wasn't gonna be there to cover for him, and they weren't gonna be able to do some things, and so they literally just ran wild in 1968.↗

3:57:36@joann_marieDo you think that's also why, like, they see that there is an end to this and that's why they're running wild right now because they have Trump? Yes.↗

3:57:44Speaker 13That's a, you know, that's a great observation. I mean, they, they see an opportunity now with Trump in the White House, they see their, their influence in, in America waning because the boomers are dying and the young people aren't with Israel, so they're going for it all right now. They have everything lined up right now, they're going for it. Exactly, that's a great observation,↗

3:58:05Speaker 13So that's 1968. So Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew run, they win, they win big, and they become president, vice president. Well, it turns out that they're both savvy to Jewish power. If you guys have heard the White House tapes, the leaked White House tapes, there's a, a two or three with Nixon especially, one especially where he's talking to the Reverend Billy Graham, and they're talking about Jews and how they're a problem. And how, Hitler had the right idea, but he went about it wrong. This is like Nixon's literally captured on,↗

3:58:37Speaker 13on, on White House tapes talking about like, once he gets reelected in '72, he's gonna do something about the Jewish problem. and Spiro Agnew makes public comments about how the media is disproportionately controlled by Jews and Zionists. That's the vice president, Spiro Agnew. Most even-- most people under fifty have never heard of Spiro Agnew, because they don't want you to know about Spiro Agnew. But, basically they lawfared him. They lawfared, Spiro Agnew, some Jewish businessmen in Baltimore, Maryland, basically set him up. They mi-- got him involved in maybe some dirty business deals, and then later, they waged lawfare against him over these business deals, and he's forced to resign the vice presidency.↗

3:59:18Speaker 13so he's out. And meanwhile, they get Nixon captured on these White House tapes talking about, "Jews are a problem, we're gonna have to do something about Jews." and some people suspect that he suspected them for killing JFK. that's possible. Also in 1970 or '71, he stopped weapons shipments to Israel for a while, b- and, and he, he was, he got fed up with the Jewish lobby. And he, and he told his advisors to, he didn't wanna see any more Jews for a while, tell him to, he was like, tell him to go talk to Kissinger or something,↗

3:59:51Speaker 13'cause he didn't wanna hear it, and he cut off, and he cut off aid to Israel for a while, that pissed the Jewish lobby off, of course, pissed Israel off. But here's the problem↗

4:00:01Speaker 23he's running things, not LBJ, he's not your guy, and you've just spent the last decade, decade, like killing people left and right So like, how do you get rid of Spiro Agnew, who is awake to Jewish power, and Richard Nixon, who's awake to Jewish power? These guys... And by the way, when they, when they won re-election in 1972,↗

4:00:27Speaker 23they won with sixty, like, over sixty percent of the popular vote, the largest margin of victory for Republicans in history. The most, they won forty-nine states to one. Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew were so popular, they won forty-nine states to one with over sixty percent of the popular vote, the biggest Republican electoral victory in history. That's how popular they were.↗

4:00:48Speaker 23How you gonna kill these guys? You gonna take- Well, you just spent the last decade killing guys. You gonna kill, you gonna kill another president and vice president again? Is that what you're gonna do? No, that's not what you're gonna do. Here's what they did. Remember Emanuel Seller? Who helped pass the Civil Rights Act of '64, the Voting Rights Act of '65, the Hart-Celler Immigration of '65, the Fair Housing Act of '68. Oh, he also passed, he also passed the Gun Control Act of 1968. He tried to take away America's guns and get 'em registered.↗

4:01:18Speaker 23I think that was like, it was like, "Let's, let's, let's flood America with a bunch of third worlders and take away Americans' guns at the same time." That was Emanuel Sellar. But he did something else. Emanuel Sellar proposed the twenty-fifth Amendment, and the twenty-fifth Amendment is the amendment that provides for presidential line of succession. Like, if something happens to the president The vice president succeeds him. What happens if something happens to the vice president who succeeds him? So the whole presidential line of succession goes president, vice president, Speaker of the House, Senate President Pro Tempore, and on down the cabinet officials, that's all set forth in the twenty-fifth Amendment. That was initiated by Emmanuel Sènal, and it's my hypothesis, it's my theory, it's my opinion, that they instituted that amendment so that they wouldn't have to assassinate people to remove their enemies. They needed a mechanism for being able to install their guys without having to be-- without having to resort to assassination. Because here's what happens↗

4:02:14Speaker 23Nixon gets caught on the White House tapes talking about how he's going to, so, well, so first Spiro Agnew's lawfare, so they get rid of Spiro Agnew first, and the twenty-fifth Amendment's brand new, and Richard Nixon has three or four options, to replace Spiro Agnew. Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, Nelson Rockefeller, and a fourth guy, who I'm blanking on. You can look it up. He sends these four names to Congress, he's like, "Okay, who's the best guy?" 'Cause Congress, under the Twenty-fifth Amendment, has to approve who the successor will be.↗

4:02:46Speaker 23The successor, in this case, to the Vice President Spiro Agnew, who's gonna be the successor. And Congress, basically comes back and says it's, it's Gerald Ford. Gerald Ford's the guy. Nelson Rockefeller was on the short list, and as I said earlier, Nelson Rockefeller was Israel's guy. They've been blackmailing him since like 1948, or 47 or 48 or 49. The Mossad has been blackmailing Nelson Rockefeller, he's their guy. Ford, also their guy, because he was their lackey who helped sell the war, like he sat on the Warren Commission and helped sell that lie to America. Okay, so Gerald Ford is also their guy.↗

4:03:20Speaker 23So you have Nixon and Spiro Agnew, both awake to Jewish power, both resolved to do something about Jewish power. That's a big problem for the Jewish lobby and Jewish power and Israel's goals. Big problem. We can't assassinate 'em. What are we gonna do? We're gonna use the Twenty-fifth Amendment. So we're gonna engineer events to get rid of these guys and use the Twenty-fifth Amendment to install our guys. So first, they lie fair Spiro Agnew, who, by the way, spent the whole rest of his life maintaining that it had been a Zionist plot↗

4:03:49Speaker 23You can go look that up. He maintained his whole life that. So, Congress comes back to Nixon and says, "Ford's the guy, it's not Reagan, it's not Rockefeller, it's Ford." So, Retrospective appoints Ford, Congress confirms him. Gerald Ford becomes the Vice President under Richard Nixon. Then, the whole Watergate thing is hatched. Now, Nixon is caught on these White House tapes in February of nineteen-↗

4:04:20Speaker 231972. Watergate break-in happens June or July of '72, just a few months later, okay?↗

4:04:29Speaker 23And of course, that leads to Richard Nixon's resignation in August of↗

4:04:37Speaker 231974. And, so then Gerald Ford becomes president, and then, under the 25th Amendment. And then under the 25th Amendment, Gerald Ford appoints Nelson Rockefeller his vice president. And so now, without firing a shot, the Jews have replaced the Jew-pilled Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew with the Jewish lackeys Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller. There's your two political↗

4:05:03Speaker 23assassinate, or political reputational assassinations, right? They didn't kill Nixon and Agnew, but they assassinated their careers and removed them, and installed their lackeys. And The Washington Post, under Katharine Graham, helps do it. Now, here's something else you might not know. You've heard about Deep Throat, and you think it's this guy named Mark Felt, right? It's, history says it's a guy named Mark Felt who died recently, and he was Deep Throat. But here's what you didn't know.↗

4:05:35Speaker 23James Angleton was forced to resign from the CIA in December of 1974. So Angleton is still there through Watergate. Doing things. Well, allegedly he resigned in December '74. Turns out they kept him on board, on salary, and he had operational jurisdiction over many-- he still had operational jurisdiction at the CIA until the end of September 1975.↗

4:06:06Speaker 23Secretly. And, the CIA director at the time, I think it was Helms, might have been Helms, I think it was Helms, basically lied to Congress or misrepresented to Congress that, that James Angleton was gone, but he wasn't. He was still, had operational control from December '74, when he allegedly resigned, until the end of September 1975. James Angleton was still in power. Now, here's what's interesting. There were two assassination attempts on Gerald Ford in September of 1975.↗

4:06:36Speaker 23Just days apart. So, I don't know, the conspiracy sus-suspicion guy in me is like, yeah, I think, I think James Angleton was essentially deep throat. There's, there's lang- there's reason to believe that James Angleton was really the insider feeding a lot of this information, orchestrating things on the inside for Woodward and Bernstein in the Washington Post. We told you earlier about how Frank Mankiewicz- Was, who was the PR guy who sent RFK to his death in '68, was in, wrote three books on Watergate, selling the whole Watergate, lie to America. He wrote three books, three books on Watergate, not one, not two, but three. Frank Frankelowitz wrote three books selling that whole charade.↗

4:07:23Speaker 23And you, you can even hear Tucker Carlson talk about this on the Joe Rogan podcast, I don't know, maybe two, three years ago, talking about how it looks like Watergate was an orchestrated takedown of, of Nixon. And, and I'm not here to say that Nixon didn't do anything wrong, but what he did, the things he did, was pretty tame by today's standards. And it's clearly he was set up, and this, and that that coup, that was an orchestrated coup, made to look like presidential malfeasance. And they used, if you look at the players and the mechanisms involved and who was swapped in and swapped out, you can see the hand that was involved here.↗

4:08:00Speaker 23they didn't like Nixon, they were suspicious of them, him, he was suspicious of them. Again, he had cut off aid to Israel out of spite, out of anger. They couldn't have that. They couldn't have- They sound-↗

4:08:12Speaker 24Yeah, go ahead. Wasn't it more of the cover up than the actual crime, 'cause he wasn't even aware of the crime when it was happening? Right. Right.↗

4:08:20Speaker 23Right, right, yeah. So, so that, yeah. Go do your research on Watergate, but yes, it was the alleged cover-up of the crime that got him in trouble.↗

4:08:29Speaker 25Sam, can I take a quick↗

4:08:30Speaker 23thing?↗

4:08:31Speaker 25Yeah, so, yeah, exactly. It isn't nothing compared to what we have now. You literally had the Obama, freaking, spy on Trump, like that's with, freaking, using like the intelligence agencies, like that's way worse than taking a box from a hotel. Like, what are we even doing here? And then, freaking, the whole Russia gate investigation's way worse, and then just the weaponization of government back and forth now between two political parties. I mean, hell, just the weaponization now that they're doing against anyone that speaks out against Israel or criticizes Jewish supremacy, that Thousand times worse than, or dare I say, six million times worse than anything that Nixon did. Oh, boohoo, he took a box allegedly from some hotel. Like, who cares? You literally have the government now spying on every person, and that's just accepted, but people cried over a box of nothing back then. It didn't f— affect the election results. He won by twenty points, and it's completely ridiculous. Yeah.↗

4:09:24Speaker 23Well, and he probably was getting bad advice from people, and people were doing stuff without his knowledge, and left, left him in a bind, and he Some poor choices, like, and I'm not saying he's guiltless, but clearly that was an engineered takedown. So was the takedown of Spiro Agnew, and then the installation of Gerald Ford and Nelson Rockefeller. You know, that's what happened. And you need to be aware of this. This is how they operate. This is how they work, right? Look at Matt Gaetz. They were thinking about making Matt Gaetz the,↗

4:09:54Speaker 23what, the Attorney General instead of Pam Bondi, right? And then he gets torpedoed. Looks like Matt, and then later, like, kinda sounds like Matt Gates is a little savvy to, to Israel, the Israeli occupation of the government, and we're like, "Ah, okay, I see what's going on here." Right? So that's, that's the political, the non-death political assassination of, of, of Richard Nixon and, and Spiro Agnew. Now, here's another interesting thing, Ian, and, and space. Katherine Graham, Katherine Meyer Graham, the Jewish head of the Washington Post, after her husband was, in July of two thousand and one↗

4:10:33Speaker 23There, you know how there's this Sun Valley conference every year where a bunch of billionaires, mostly Jewish billionaires, go, goes and meets at this, this world conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, happens every year. You guys, you guys know about that?↗

4:10:47Speaker 23Yeah, some of you know about it. You can go look it up. But every year there's a meeting of basically gazillionaires in Sun Valley, Idaho. A lot of them are Jewish. She's at that event in July of two thousand one. Allegedly slips and falls and hits her head on the sidewalk and ends up dying.↗

4:11:08@joann_marieIn that conference?↗

4:11:10Speaker 23At that conference. Oh, wow. So, I don't know, I'm a suspicious motherfucker, and people don't just slip and fall and hit their heads on sidewalks and die, you know? I mean, maybe. Maybe. Or maybe after a lifetime of helping bury bodies, somebody decided, "You know what? We got 9/11 on the calendar, two months, like, in less than two months, it's less than two months away.↗

4:11:35Speaker 23Maybe Katherine's not on board anymore, maybe we need somebody new. I don't know, but like, that's suspicious timing to me. That's a suspicious death, suspicious timing. Now you can go read about it, and it'll make- The online, you know, reporting will make it sound legit. Her family was there, they were coming out of church or something, some function, and they were there when she slipped and hit her head, and they took her to a hospital, and she was, you know, on life support and this and that. I don't know, I don't know.↗

4:12:07Speaker 23But I do know that she knew where a lot of bodies were buried, a lot of bodies, figuratively and literally. And, I don't know, maybe that's just a loose end you tie up. Put a nice little bow on it, and all those bodies are buried forever now. You know, before she has a chance to write a memoir or leave a dead man's switch or, I don't know what, you know?↗

4:12:28Speaker 23but I don't know, Ian, like, like, do we need to-- How many more assassinations do we need to do?↗

4:12:35Ian MalcolmOh, no, I mean, I-- Well, that's, that's the thing, I-- we, we, we set, twenty-five, but, I, I know we've gone well past that. But, but Sam, the, the craziest piece about this, so if, if we think about kind of the, the roster here, right? Well, we started with primarily the, Rockwell, the MLK And the wildest part is that you see the,↗

4:13:04Ian Malcolmlet, let's say the, the removal of impediments that, that basically stand not only in opposition to the, the discombobulation of our culture, which was largely pushed through the, the racial integrations of that era, right? But then you see them moving the chess pieces around to get the politicians that they need. The, the, the craziest piece is, th-this window that we really spoke a lot about and un- In fact, in particular the fifties, sixties, seventies,↗

4:13:34Ian Malcolmwhen you look back and you describe it as detailed as you do, and you realize it, it was almost every other year a major figure is just getting whacked, and by comparison, you know, everybody witnessed Charlie Kirk, and that was unbelievably, for some it was traumatic, it was demoralizing, it was all of these emotions. I, I can't fathom existing in a world where this kind of thing is happening I mean, almost every single year with a major figure either getting killed, all the way up to, to Nixon and, and, and, Watergate and, and kind of this, you know, the chaos that that would have constructed. and, and it's just, it's crazy to think about because today, I suppose, we would look in the present and say, "Well, at least we don't have that occurring as crazily as it did back then," but I suppose- At the same time, things just escalate even quicker, and it's whether it's COVID, whether it's Trump, whether it's Iran, whether it's Israel, whether-- on and on and on. George↗

4:14:33Speaker 25Floyd, George Floyd instead. They do-- they just used a random fentanyl addict as their freaking St. Louis Park riots.↗

4:14:40Ian MalcolmWell, well, right, ex-exactly, and I was just gonna say, Sam, that it's, it's just, you know, it, it seems like as long as they can amplify the chaos, right? It goes back to the, the Game of Thrones quote, "The chaos is a ladder, and somebody's gonna climb it," and they just keep climbing, it's everything, they, they just keep stirring the, the crabs in the bucket below them. but it's, it's wild to think how many-- I mean, you must have covered ten↗

4:15:06Ian Malcolmto fifteen major po In w-what, like a single decade almost, all these people just dying left and right?↗

4:15:15Speaker 23Well, I wanna give you two more. Can I give you two more? I think you have two more. Will you take two more? Well, so first I just wanna reiterate Charles de Gaulle. Charles de Gaulle in November of nineteen sixty-seven gave a famous speech, and he called for peace in the Middle East. And he called-- and he said, he said, "I think we can make it happen," but basically he, to paraphrase him, he said, "The United States is↗

4:15:39Speaker 23'Cause how can you have, how can you preach peace in the Middle East if you're still waging war in Vietnam? So he calls for a, a withdrawal from Vietnam, and then he calls for peace between Palestine and Israel in the Middle East, and that's in November '67. Well, obviously, those are the two things that Israel hates. We gotta keep the Vietnam War going, and we can't have peace in the Middle East, so they have to get rid of de Gaulle, too. So I find it interesting that at the same time, riots are erupting in the United States around, Columbia University anti-which was led by Jews, Jews lead these, anti-Vietnam War protests at, at Columbia University at the same time That, that Martin Luther King's getting assassinated. At that same time, you have the May sixth, it's called May '68, you have these riots also led by Jews in France that end up deposing President Charles de Gaulle.↗

4:16:31Speaker 23And at the same time, they're hatching a, a Jewish psychiatrist with the Navy is, leading a program to brainwash a Palestinian to be a patsy to assassinate Yasser Arafat. At the same time, they're brainwashing Sauron, Sauron to be the patsy to assassinate RFK in June of 1968. Okay? You with me? Well, also in 1968, you have the attempted assassination of the head of the United Auto Workers, the UAW. His name is Walter Reuther. Okay? Walter Reuther was the head of the UAW from 1946 until he's assassinated,↗

4:17:07Speaker 23in 1970. It won't tell you it's assassinated, it'll tell you that he dies in a plane crash, okay? But there, but, he, there's an attempt, he, there's an attempted plane crash, I call it an attempted plane crash. He has a plane mishap in October of 1968 that he survives. Then there's another plane mishap in like 1969 that he also survives, okay? Then there's finally another plane crash in 1970 and he dies. Okay. Now his wife is Jewish, they're both very Zionist, he give, he gives speeches in service of Zionism, and he's given,↗

4:17:50Speaker 23and, and the Weizmann, the Chaim Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel gives Ruther the Weizmann Award in Science and Humanities and establishes the Walter P. Ruther Chair of Research in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy.↗

4:18:06Speaker 23So my Spidey senses start tingling when this guy is finally assassinated after three attempted plane mishaps, starting in 1968, that, that, that assassination year of 1968, the first attempt on him. I find it really suspicious that a guy who's the head of the United Auto Workers in the United States is, is given this award in Israel. The Walter P. Reuther Chair of Research in the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy. What the hell does the head of the American United Auto Workers have to do with a-a-atomic energy in Israel?↗

4:18:44Speaker 23I don't know, but we know there was a lot of nuclear hijinks going on in the '60s, and I kinda wonder what Walter, how Walter Reuther was wrapped up in that. And you know what they say when they start giving you awards, you know? Naming streets after you, naming ballrooms after you, you know, James Angleton getting a plaque in a park named after him in Israel, right? I just, I don't know. I don't know, I'm a little suspicious of a guy who's a Zionist, Jewish wife who dies in a plane crash after two failed plane crash attempts on him. And then Israel names a, a, a science chair at a university after him on the peaceful uses of atomic energy? I'm a little suspicious. Now, here's the hypothesis, and this, this isn't my hypothesis, this comes from somebody else, somebody else who's doing research on this, and that is they think that↗

4:19:41Speaker 23the United Auto Workers pension fund was being used to launder funds to the Israeli nuclear program.↗

4:19:49Speaker 23And I think there's evidence there for that, that they were laundering money. So again, the United Auto Workers, like the biggest auto union right in the country, big pension fund, and this guy is married to a Jew, and he's a big time Zionist, and he allows the pension fund to be used to launder funds to the Israelis to build their covert nuclear weapons program. So that puts him in the know.↗

4:20:17Speaker 23Of something really fucking dangerous. And so maybe that's why you kill him in a plane crash, and maybe that's why you name the atomic energy chair at your research university after him.↗

4:20:32Speaker 23And you've never heard of him? I'll bet most people in this base have never heard of Walter Reuther, even though he was the head of the UAW for twenty-five years, big-time player in politics, huge, massive person. But They didn't seem real concerned about getting to the bottom of that plane crash, did they? Kinda got swept under the rug. Kinda like the Charlie Kirk assassination.↗

4:20:55Speaker 23No Zionist or pro-Israel Jew seems to be all that interested in getting to the bottom of the Charlie Kirk assassination. You know what I mean? And these people have a lot of influence, they have a lot of power, especially in the media. If you take out one of their buddies, one of their friends, one of their big allies,↗

4:21:10Speaker 23don't you think they'd wanna use that power and influence to get to the bottom of it? But they didn't. They didn't then, and they're not now. I find that really interesting. I find that really interesting. So that's another assassination, in my opinion. Another one is Hale Boggs. Hale Boggs, was, the House Majority Leader in Congress in the early '70s. he had sat on the Warren Commission. Hale Boggs was one of the members of the Warren Commission. And in 1972, while he was still the Majority Leader of the US Congress.↗

4:21:44Speaker 23He was lost. in Alaska, his plane just mysteriously disappeared and they never found it.↗

4:21:56Speaker 23So this guy Hale Boggs, who's the, the majority leader of Congress, who had been on the Warren Commission, helped sell that lie to America, in 1972 just mysteriously disappears in a plane in Alaska. Wait, they never found the plane? Didn't even find the plane.↗

4:22:14Speaker 24I think if I remember, maybe I'm remembering this wrong, Sam. Wasn't the person that drove him to the airport, Bill Clinton?↗

4:22:24Speaker 23I don't know, I don't know. Yeah. I don't think so, I've never heard that, but like if you say so, again,↗

4:22:32Speaker 24I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure.↗

4:22:36Speaker 23I'm lo- I'm looking now, I'm not seeing. Somebody looked that up. Google that or Grog it or something, but maybe. I, I've never heard that, I don't see anything here that I'm looking at, but, I mean, maybe. But obviously that's an assassination, right? Plane crashes, plane disappearances, aviation accidents, they're-- I'm, I'm, I'm sorry, those are assassinations, okay? And that actually takes us into another high-profile assassination, JFK Junior.↗

4:23:03Speaker 23JFK Junior, who was teasing a run for governor of New York. Now, here's the, we talked earlier about narratives and fake counter-narratives, right? The narrative, the fake narrative, in this case, is that, you know, there was fog, he got disoriented, and he crashed the plane. Alright, that's the fake narrative. Now, the fake counter-narrative is that Hillary Clinton, he was gonna run for Senate, and Hillary Clinton wanted his Senate seat, so she had him killed, and it was the Clinton body count that got JFK Junior.↗

4:23:35Ian MalcolmWhich there are a lot of.↗

4:23:38Speaker 23There are a lot of, a lot of 'em aren't theirs though, like we know who the, if you know anything about, Arkansas,↗

4:23:44Speaker 24and, and I just posted in the purple pill saying it was Bill Clinton that drove him to the airport.↗

4:23:49Speaker 23Would you have a source for that? Yeah.↗

4:23:52@joann_mariein-↗

4:23:54Speaker 24Just do a Google search, it's↗

4:23:55Speaker 23all-↗

4:23:55Speaker 24Yeah, in↗

4:23:56@joann_marie1972, while working in Texas, coordinator of George McGovern presidential campaign, a young Bill Clinton drove visiting, visiting Congressman Hill back to the airport. All right,↗

4:24:09Speaker 23there it is. There it is.↗

4:24:10Ian MalcolmThat's unreal.↗

4:24:12Speaker 23So later, Bill Clinton, of course, becomes governor of Arkansas, and he helps cover up.↗

4:24:16Speaker 26That's wild, that's wild.↗

4:24:18Speaker 23And, yeah, and he, and, and Bill Clinton helps cover up. So, do you guys know about Mena, Arkansas, and Southern Air Transport, the CIA's airline out of this little airport in Mena, Arkansas? They made a↗

4:24:28Ian Malcolmmovie about it.↗

4:24:29Speaker 23They didn't make a movie. Now, the movie's mostly bullshit, but if you've seen the movie, you'll at least know what I'm talking about. What, which movie?↗

4:24:36Ian MalcolmAmerican Made with Tom Cruise. American Made. Just throw it in your face.↗

4:24:39Speaker 23Yeah. base-- So here's what happened. So Israel, so Iran-Contra, Iran-Contra is, it's aptly named because the Israelis invented-- The Israelis and, and Jews in America. Invented the Iran Contra, scheme, and they named it something that wouldn't implicate the Israelis and the Jews, right? Obviously. But Israel started the weapons trafficking to Iran first, okay? Then they got the Americans involved with the Iran Contra scheme after they'd already started doing the scheme. But basically what was happening was the United States was selling, arms to Iran to arm them against Iraq in the Iran-Iraq War in the early '80s,↗

4:25:21Speaker 23and and they were, what they were doing is they were moving the weapons through Israel. But that's because Israel was, had already started selling weapons to Iran first, and then they got us involved. They, they hatched this scheme to get us involved to give them cover, basically. And, so we're moving weapons to Iran via Israel, we're taking the proceeds, the money from those Sales, and we're giving them to the Contras in Nicaragua because the Sandinista government in,↗

4:25:54Speaker 23in Nicaragua was anti-Zionist. Up until the late '70s, Nicaragua actually had a really cozy trading partnership with Israel. Like there was like a lot of arms trafficking, Israel was like supplying weapons and stuff to, to Nicaragua, and they were making a lot of money doing it. And the Sandinista government comes into power, and,↗

4:26:15Speaker 23they're anti-Zionist. And so Israel's losing an ally on the world stage, they're losing a trading partner, and we see this playing out right now, this whole scheme right now in hunt to install, Juan Orlando Contreras or, or Honduras, wherever the hell is, Hernandez, Juan, Orlando, Hernandez, this, the former president of Honduras who then got convicted of like drug trafficking and then Pres- Trump just pardoned him, and now he's like helping, like, overthrow Honduras.↗

4:26:47Speaker 23And we saw, Maduro get overthrown in Venezuela, this, it's the same thing going on now. Israel is basically, capturing Central and South America, right? G-gaining allies on the world stage, claiming resources for the global Jewish empire. That's what's going on. Well, that's what h- was happening back then. Israel was losing an ally on the world stage, and they were losing a trading partner in, in Nicaragua.↗

4:27:13Speaker 23And so, so the money from the, the weapon sales to Iran was being funneled to the Contras, who were supposed to basically fight and depose the Sandinistas in Nicaragua and install an Israel-friendly government. And the ADL was involved in this, the CIA was involved in this, Jeffrey Epstein was involved in this, and, one of the major hubs of the operation was in Mena, Arkansas, which is just like an hour and a half or two hours west of Little Rock, where Bill Clinton was there. The governor at the time, okay, covering it up. And like the CIA was literally filing, flying,↗

4:27:51Speaker 23Nicaraguan Contras into Arkansas, and they were training, an army of Contras to go back to Nicaragua and depose the Sandinistas, very similar to the Bay of Pigs, if you will, you know? They were, they were↗

4:28:03Speaker 27also- Oliver North, he was something to do with that, wasn't he? Well,↗

4:28:07Speaker 23Oliver North was involved and they pinned it on him. but here's who they didn't pin it on. They didn't pin it on, the Secretary of Defense, Eliot Abrams, who was a Jew. There were major high-profile Jews involved with higher authority than Oliver North. So basically, what you had is a situation where you had high-profile Jews in the American government basically hatching a scheme to help Israel and blaming it on Goyim Okay, that's, that's basically what happened.↗

4:28:34Speaker 24What, what would your take be, on, on, Vice President Bush being involved in that, considering his drug ties of Air America? So I,↗

4:28:44Speaker 23so I think he was involved. The other thing you need to, remember about the Bushes is they were also being blackmailed by Mossad. So remember how I told you Nelson Rockefeller and Allen Dulles were being blackmailed by Mossad? Prescott Bush-↗

4:28:57Speaker 24I, I wasn't in the space at that time, I'm sorry.↗

4:28:59Speaker 23Yeah, George Bush's father↗

4:29:03Speaker 23Blackmailed. Okay. So, the Bush family- What did they↗

4:29:07@joann_mariehave on him? Like, I, the, the Rockefellers because of the oil with the Nazis↗

4:29:11Speaker 23and the- The blackmail, yeah. The blackmail, comes from the fact that the Dole brothers, the pre- and the Bushes and the Rockefellers basically traded with the Nazis, prior to World War II, and maybe even in some ways-↗

4:29:25Speaker 24Wouldn't it also go back to, to, the fact that they all colluded to, with Smedley Butler, to throw a military Of FDR.↗

4:29:34Speaker 23Oh yeah, so the business plot. Yeah, I don't think the blackmail was centered around the blackmail.↗

4:29:39Speaker 26No,↗

4:29:42Speaker 26no, no, so hold on, hold on. We're getting a little crazy. I, no, the↗

4:29:46Speaker 23blackmail, as I understand it, was centered around their involvement with the Nazis. And if that's, if the business plot is wrapped up in that, then, then okay, then the business plot's wrapped up in that. But I, I↗

4:29:55Speaker 24think that was the, that was the whole point, was to get into the war, and that, and Do that military coup was, was part of that?↗

4:30:05Speaker 23The business plot was like, what,↗

4:30:09Speaker 231933? That was far, far before the war.↗

4:30:12Speaker 24Yeah, so they were trying to, they were trying to get us like involved That whole time, and that, and that's where they had hatched that, that military coup. Yeah, so that's what they wanted.↗

4:30:22Speaker 23Thirty-three is the business plot. No, what they wanted to do is they wanted to overthrow Franklin Roosevelt and install Smiley Butler as the dictator and have a fascist government like, like the Nazi government, like the Nazi government. That, that's not what the-- That's not what the blackmail was about. The blackmail was about these guys had business ties to the Third Reich and did business with the Third Reich secretly, even up into the war. They, they were↗

4:30:47Speaker 24We had a lot of, we had a lot of plants over there that had gotten bombed, and I believe a lot of the, what was it, the, a lot of the, corporations has actually sued the federal government and won judgments against the fact that we had bombed the, the plants that we had helped build over there for Nazi Germany, if I remember correctly.↗

4:31:09Speaker 23yeah, I mean, that's, it's quite possible, right? absolutely. But it's so wild. Part of it's oversold because a lot of it was just doing business. They were just doing business. It was a country that they were doing business with. It was, it's now in hindsight, it's painted as some evil thing, oh, they were collaborating with the Nazis. Well, were they collaborating with Nazis or were they just doing business? You see, there's kind of a difference. And but during the post-war years, in the immediate post-war years, it wouldn't be seen in any favorable light, especially if they were still doing business into the war, which these↗

4:31:45Speaker 23One of the, the Dolez, one of the sisters of the Dolez brothers was married to a Jew, and she got the business on these guys, and she knew about it, and she passed it on to Reuven Shiloah, who was the first director of Mossad, he's one of the founding members of Mossad, and he blackmailed Rockefeller and the, and the Bushes and the Dolez brothers over these Nazi, affiliations and business dealings. And so, so the-- so this helps This helps garner support for Israel to become a state from Rockefeller in nineteen forty-eight, and it also, compromises these guys going forward. So you have Meyer Lansky blackmailing J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, you had Mossad blackmailing Allen Dulles, the head of the CIA, and, and, and then you had the Bushes also, being blackmailed. So when you get to George Bush, senior, the son of Prescott Bush, these guys are compromised. These are lackeys, they're compromised, right? and he's of course And as we know, you don't get these positions, you don't get those positions without the say so of our occupying, our occupiers, you know?↗

4:32:51Speaker 23by then the, the government was controlled by Jews and the Zionists, right? And so, but prior to that wasn't, wasn't that the CIA?↗

4:32:59@joann_marieHow long was it?↗

4:33:00Speaker 23So, so, so, so when, so when Reagan's assassinated by this guy, by, What's his name? I'm just blanking on the, the guy who shot, Reagan.↗

4:33:14Speaker 23John Hinckley. John Hinckley, John Hinckley, thank you. he was supposed to have dinner with George Bush's brother like that night or the next day. Like, what was that all about? You can go look into the, we haven't covered the Reagan assassination tonight, but there's a lot of funny business around the Reagan assassination too, and a lot of people think, a lot of people see that as a Bush plot, but↗

4:33:39Speaker 23Reagan was reticent to back up the Israelis in Lebanon and in the Middle East, and I think they were basically wanted to take him out, and I think that they were using the Bushes as cover, or, you know, one of their guys, or they're working through them 'cause the Bushes are compromised. And if you're blackmailed and compromised, you're not the one calling the shots. You're not the one calling the shots. Trump's not calling any fucking shots. Alright, Miriam Adelson, Benjamin Netanyahu, these are the people calling the shots. So George Bush wasn't calling any fucking shots. You see what I'm saying? Now, he might have been holding the trigger or something, metaphorically speaking, but he's not calling the shots.↗

4:34:17@joann_marieSo, we need to do a Reagan space. I don't know anything about this, like at all. This is so interesting.↗

4:34:24Speaker 23Yeah, very, very interesting. maybe we'll do it another time, but yeah, go look into the Reagan assassinations. Very, it's very suspicious, very suspicious. A lot of suspicious things going on there. and the Bushes probably are implicated or involved in some way, and that's been covered up. But again, I, you know- There's triggermen and then there's masterminds, and, and the ultimate man behind the curtain. And in the Reagan assassination, I'm sorry, but we know who assassinated presidents, with lone gunmen. We know who does that. And, and we also know that the Bushes weren't a compromised family, and you don't get to those levels of power we now know unless you're compromised by these people. So I have a hard time thinking it was really just a Bush plot. I have a hard time thinking that. Sorry, but↗

4:35:13Speaker 23you know, I sort of see them in, in the same way I see the Clintons. The Clintons were also wrapped up with, Epstein, right? And this Jewish global mafia. And, we see in the case of John F. Kennedy Junior., to bring it back to him, you know, the fake counter narrative, in my opinion, is that the Clintons took him out. Well, I think it's pretty clear that they took JFK Junior. out because he was a threat. Just like they took RFK out, and I think one of the reasons why RFK Junior. didn't-- for, for decades, RFK Junior. didn't get involved in politics, and before,↗

4:35:46Speaker 23Before this campaign in twenty twenty-four, if, if you go back to the last twenty twenty-five years, there are many interviews and many times where people would ask RFK Junior., "Why don't you ever, why don't you run? Why don't you, you know, do this, do that? Why don't you get into this governor's race or senate race or whatever?" People asked him that for decades, and his answer was always, "No, I think, you know, I think I can do better. You know, what I'm doing here, I'm making a lot of difference↗

4:36:16Speaker 23Get assassinated. So obviously he didn't want, you know, he didn't get-- but we see him getting involved now. But who's he carrying water for now? We see him out there marching with Rabbi Schmuly, you know, and singing the praises of his- He looks so↗

4:36:29Ian Malcolmdefeated, Sam. It's↗

4:36:30Speaker 23so defeated, right? So clearly he's cut a deal. Okay, you can do something, we're gonna let you play in the sandbox, we're gonna give you the little play, the, the little play trucks to play with here, and we won't whack you, but you have to do what, do what we say, right? And I, I think that's pretty clear as what's going on. He's compromised in some way, you know, he moved his wife's body, who hung herself, allegedly hung herself in their barn, right? And then they buried her, and then he moved the body without You know, and how is he involved in his wife's death? Who, by the way, his wife, who was found hanging in the barn, was longtime friends with Joanne Maxwell from like the early 1980s. She knew Joanne Maxwell was friends with Joanne Maxwell before she ever even met RK.↗

4:37:18Speaker 23So they go way back. She goes way back. I↗

4:37:22@joann_mariehave no idea. There's another assassination. I wasn't,↗

4:37:26Speaker 23you know, I wasn't expecting to cover that one tonight, Ian, but there's another one. RFK's first wife, who was found hanging in the barn, allegedly through suicide, but she was a longtime friend of Jolene Maxwell, and then after they buried her, he had the body moved, destroying whatever evidence there might have been. W-well, he moved the body? Moved the body. I've done a thread on this. If you guys go search my timeline, you can find it.↗

4:37:51Speaker 23And if you wanna, if somebody wants to, if you wanna go find that in and pin it up in the, in the jumbotron, you can. Yeah, lemme,↗

4:37:56Ian MalcolmI'll get it right now.↗

4:37:58Speaker 23Go find it. RFK Junior. wife body, I don't know, search terms, you'll find it. And, I did a whole thread on it, but, So I think there's something going on there too, right? So again, we have, the usual suspects, the every single timers, wrapped up in the RFK Junior. wife death, perhaps, you know? And now it's like, is he compromised? According to Ryan Dawson, he's spoken with people involved, and he said definitely he killed her, or they killed her, and he's being blackmailed. He's like, it's for sure. Ryan Dawson says it's for sure. Maybe so.↗

4:38:33Speaker 23he's a pretty good researcher. I think that's the- Signs certainly point that way. But JFK Junior, you know, he was, he was publishing that magazine, very popular, he was very popular, at the time, very good looking, handsome young man, a lot of energy. He would have, he was teasing either a run for governor or senate. And I think it's my opinion that he was gonna run for governor. He wins governor of New York, that's a stepping stone to the White House. JFK Junior winning governor of New York state Is a stepping stone to the White House. And so what do you have to do? You don't wait for him to become governor and then assassinate him if he runs for president. You don't do that, it's too late, can't, it's too suspicious, right? You can't do it after he's announced. So they got him in a plane crash. Now witnesses, there are eyewitnesses that say they heard an explosion.↗

4:39:23Speaker 23You know, and there's a lot of other funny business, I'm not gonna get into all the details, but suffice it to say that the whole, like, he crashed in the fog is wrong, there was no fog. It was a, it was a flight path that he'd done dozens of times, he knew it like the back of his hand, he was a very safe flyer. Witnesses, oh, and then the other thing is, his, JFK Junior's sister, Carolyn Kennedy, JFK's daughter, married a Jew.↗

4:39:48Speaker 23And he convinced the families, 'cause, JFK Jr. was Catholic, he was married to a Catholic, and, and by the way, his wife was pregnant, and their sister, and her sister was with them, too. So four people died in that plane crash: JFK Jr., his wife, his unborn son, and, and her, and his wife's, sister. They're all Catholic, and Carolyn Kennedy's, Carolyn Kennedy, his sister, her husband was a Jew, and he basically bullied them into cremating the bodies.↗

4:40:19Speaker 23And when you cremate the bodies, you destroy all the evidence, okay? So that happens, then they say, "Well, he was gonna run for Senate, and so maybe it's Hillary that whacked him, right?" That's the fake counter-narrative. But you have to start with the main idea, and that is he's a Kennedy, and they killed him to, to keep covering, 'cause the Kennedy murders are serial murders, right? They killed Kennedy, then they had to kill RFK, because RFK was gonna win the White House and reopen the investigation and would've exposed him, so they had to kill him. And then when JFK Jr. became popular, and it looked like he was gonna run for governor, he would've won, would've been a shoo-in, and then it would've been a stepping stone to the White House,↗

4:41:00Speaker 23and↗

4:41:05Speaker 23And killed him. And then that kept RFK Junior out of politics for decades. And now that he's in, now they got dirt on him and, you know, obviously there's a, you know, RFK talks openly, by the way, that Serrano didn't kill his dad. That's clear. If anybody doesn't know, it's clear because the, the autopsy report says that the death shots came from close range behind RFK,↗

4:41:26Speaker 23and Serrano was several feet away in front of RFK. Not only that, there are twelve or thirteen shots on acoustic analysis, and his gun only held eight shots. A lot of other things. We didn't really get deep into RFK tonight, although I've done a thread on it. You guys can search my timeline for my RFK thread, one of the biggest threads I've ever done. Really interesting stuff, you should definitely go read about it.↗

4:41:52Speaker 23and okay, yeah, so we got up in the jumbotron, we got the, the RFK threads on moving the body, we got the JFK yeah, we got the RFK threads on moving the body yet. Those are up in the Jumbotron, everybody. I did a big thread on RFK's assassination. I don't know if you wanna find that too, even throw that up there. But, it's, it's like a twenty-five or thirty tweets long. It's massive. It took me hours, took me weeks of research and days of making memes and then hours of deploying it.↗

4:42:23Speaker 23but Point is, is Sauron, Sauron didn't kill, RFK, and RFK Junior has been very open about that. I think everybody kinda-- It's one of these things, like everybody's acknowledging that, yeah, he couldn't have killed his dad, but like they just let Sauron, Sauron languish in prison anyway and don't do anything about it. And this takes us back to Charlie Kirk, because↗

4:42:45Speaker 23They want two James Earl Ray, Charlie Kirk. They want a Surrans or, they want a James Earl Ray or Surransurransurrantyler Robinson. Because, in the case of James Earl Ray, the patsy, lone gunman for Martin Luther King, who also didn't kill Martin Luther King, they just let him rot in prison until he died. And they, the King family brought a wrongful death lawsuit against Lloyd Jowers, who was one of the conspirators in the MLK assassination, and a, and a jury found Lloyd Jowers, Lloyd Jowers guilty along↗

4:43:15Speaker 23A jury determined there was a government conspiracy involving Loid Jowers to assassinate Martin Luther King in nineteen ninety nine. Most of you probably don't know that, because the media doesn't talk about it, they don't report it, they just repeat ad nauseum that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King, even though in the court of law it's been established that Loid Jowers, in a, in a, in a conspiracy with the government, killed Martin Luther King. But you're not told that, nobody talks about it. And so I think what they wanna do, and the same thing with Sauron, Sauron, Sauron, Sauron got a shitty defense,↗

4:43:47Speaker 23and they pinned it on him, and he clearly didn't do it. And but yet everybody just says Serrano killed RFK. And they're gonna do the same thing with Tyler Robinson, that's what they're already doing. Everybody already said Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk, and they just wanna get a conviction. What they really would like to have done is probably killed him in a shootout, a staged shootout or something, or suicided him or something, but he turned himself in instead and ruined the plan, something. Either way, they're trying to basically paint him as the guilty party before this ever even gets to trial, and they, they just want the public in their minds, they want us to all think that Tyler Robinson did it, no matter what happens now. They just-- they want most people to just like not even see what's going on and just- For the rest of time, recorded time, think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk. That's what they're trying to sell, that's what they're trying to set in stone, and that's what we're fighting against. We're fighting against the same forces and the same techniques that have cemented in the minds of the American people that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King, and that Surran Surran killed, RFK, and that, and that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK, and so on and so on and so forth, right? That's what they're trying to cement in↗

4:44:59Speaker 23The nuts and bolts, right down to the dotted eyes and cross T's, right, right down to the bones. That's what's happening. And I, I've done spaces before on all the parallels between the Charlie Kirk assassination and the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassinations. I don't wanna get into that tonight, but there are, I have identified maybe at least two dozen parallels between the Charlie Kirk assassination and each of those other three assassinations. It's crazy. There's like two, at least two dozen parallels. And that's just not an accident. It's not an accident because they're running the same play, they're running the same play, they're running the same playbook, the same techniques, right? They just keep going back to the well.↗

4:45:35Speaker 23So the most obvious one is, of course, the lone gunman patsy and, covering up the crime scene, you know, those are two of the biggest ones, but there are dozens of, almost two dozen other parallels between, between these assassinations, so,↗

4:45:52Speaker 23Yeah, so that's what I have, Ian. could probably keep going, but like, we've been here for what, four hours? Five hours. I was gonna↗

4:46:01Ian Malcolmsay, Sam, we might, we might have to do a, a part two and perhaps, take some of the--↗

4:46:08Speaker 23Let me give you guys an honorable mention, Buddy Holly, the rocker, since we said celebrities. I was gonna say,↗

4:46:13Ian Malcolmyeah, some of the, the, some of the, the Hollywood aspects of it, we might have to do an entire space on,↗

4:46:21Speaker 23on that We mentioned John Lennon, of course there's Michael Jackson, Tupac, Big, Biggie Smalls, that were likely killed by, Tupac and Biggie Smalls likely killed by the Jewish Defense League, the JDL or some el-radical Jewish element there. But yeah, you guys can also find on my timeline, go look up Buddy Holly on my bass Sam Parker account, and- You can find a video I did on that. Buddy Holly basically tried to leave his Jewish record label and start his own independent record label,↗

4:46:55Speaker 23died mysteriously in a, in a plane crash. There's other things, there's more details, but- weren't there↗

4:47:01Speaker 24several others,↗

4:47:04Ian Malcolmothers on that, that- Was that about Buddy Holly? Was that about Buddy Holly's death? So,↗

4:47:08Speaker 23yeah, so Buddy, so he was on the plane with, Ritchie Valens and, and the Big Bopper, and, They, all three of them, died along with the pilot, in the crash, and then of course Don McLean's "American Pie" memorializes it, you know, the day the music died. And then, by the way, by the way, and you'll see this in the video, but then, Hollywood made a movie called "The Buddy Holly Story," and it was written by a Jew named Robert Gitler from a story by a Jew named Alan Swire, and is based on the book "Buddy Holly: His Life and Times" by John Goldratt↗

4:47:45Speaker 23Columbia Pictures, which was headed by Alan J. Hersheyp, a Jew. So basically, Jewish record label, he leaves them, tries to start his own independent record label, dies mysteriously in a plane crash, and then a bunch of Jews in Hollywood make a bunch of money off of, off of, of books and movies on, on his death.↗

4:48:05Speaker 23Game set match,↗

4:48:07Speaker 24every fucking time.↗

4:48:11Speaker 23I love Buddy Holly, by the way. He's got great music, and, and I'm pretty proud of the, video I put together on that, too. It's not, not anything complicated, but I think you'll, I think you guys will like it if you go find it on my, on my timeline.↗

4:48:22Ian MalcolmWell, and Sam, it's, it's curious, I was, just looking, speaking of that era, I was looking into, to Sam Phillips, if, if you know him from Sun Records, which is interesting just↗

4:48:40Ian MalcolmLewis, Carl Perkins, Johnny Cash, and a couple other mega stars, and started out as kind of a, a much smaller little production. but looking over that, if I'm not mistaken, Sam Phillips, not Jewish, but ended up selling the rights to almost all those acts to, to bigger studios when they got big. but, but, but it, it, it is a very interesting little era of, of music, and obviously there's a whole bunch, speaking of kind of the control Of it, and, and Sam, I'm not sure if you wanna say a couple words on Motown and how essentially, you know, pe-people talk, ab-about the black community, how it was, you know, certainly under attack from almost every angle by this group of people, and a lot of early Motown singers trying to get out and build kind of their own little, labels and to get away from the, the, you know, who's, and got wrangled right back into it.↗

4:49:37Speaker 23You know, I'm not real familiar with all the history of Motown and all that, I, I, I know some of the music obviously, I'm not well versed in that, but I will tell you an interesting Motown parallel. You guys, so coming back to the Charlie Kirk assassination, you remember the last guy to talk to Charlie Kirk was Hunter Kozak, the kid wearing the green hoodie, talking about transgender violence and transgender shooters that Charlie was talking to, and he is shot, right? That's Hunter Kozak.↗

4:50:05Speaker 23Hunter Kozak's grandfather is Hollywood royalty. His name is Elliot Kozak, that's his grandpa. He's a Jew, okay? Hunter's half-Jewish, himself, half-ethnically Jewish, 'cause his dad is, is Steve Kozak, a producer for The Jimmy Kimmel Show. But Steve's father, Hunter's grandfather, Elliot Kozak, was Bob Hope's manager for several decades, like Bob Hope's right hand man, big-time Hollywood producer, Elliot Kozak. You can go Google him and find articles about him. This guy's a Hollywood big shot, a Jewish power player in Hollywood. That's Hunter Kozak's grandpa, Elliot Kozak. Elliot Kozak produced Motown 25 in 1983, when Michael Jackson unveiled his moonwalk to the world. On that, on that famous Motown 25 special,↗

4:50:56Speaker 23that's where Michael Jackson first publicly unveils the moonwalk? Okay? Elliott Kozak produced that show.↗

4:51:11Speaker 23That's the grandpa, Hunter Kozak, the guy who was talking to Charlie when Charlie was shot. Wow. Unfucking↗

4:51:17Speaker 28real.↗

4:51:22Ian MalcolmIt, it, Sam, it gets to a point where you look at this stuff and it's like- And,↗

4:51:25Speaker 23and of course, and of course, who killed Michael Jackson? We know who killed Michael Jackson now, too. So like- Like what the fuck,↗

4:51:30Ian Malcolmyou know? Well, well, that's what I was gonna say. It, it's, it gets to a point where you look at all this stuff and it's, it's literally like a hundred people and their kids and grandkids, and they're all just involved in all of this stuff somehow with overlaps everywhere.↗

4:51:45Speaker 23Hey, I-I'm- I'm sorry, can I- Doesn't matter what thread you pull on, it's, it's, it's, it is the meme. You go far enough down the rabbit hole and the TV comes silent.↗

4:51:55Speaker 24Can, can I ask another like political assassination that really wasn't an assassination, but a, a removal? Like, what, what do you think, what do you think about George Bush Senior being removed, for Bill Clinton? Oh, well, actually, this is↗

4:52:10Speaker 23one I wanted to bring up because George Bush Senior, God bless him. He actually tried to restrain Israel. Back at the Madrid Peace Conference, in nineteen ninety-one or nineteen ninety or ninety-one at the Madrid Peace Conference, basically, he, he withheld American aid from Israel, to basically pressure the Israelis to come to the table and make a deal with Arafat and the Palestinians. And, and that pissed off the Jews, it pissed off the Israelis. And, they tried to orchestrate,↗

4:52:42Speaker 23Basically, they tried to get Congress to overrule him, and he beat him. He, he beat Congress and, and, and held out. And but that pissed him off. So what they did is, they backed Bill Clinton in '92. And, weren't they also↗

4:53:00Speaker 24pissed too that he didn't go far enough in the first Gulf War, too?↗

4:53:04Speaker 23it's possible, it's possible. There, there are elements, there are obviously Israeli elements in that too, but they were-- But what I was gonna say is, they actually dispatched three assassins, Palestinians. They, they, they sent three Palestinians to be patsies in an assassination plot against George Bush Senior at the Madrid Peace Conference. That's the piece I was getting to. Is Mossad hatched an assassination plot? They were gonna assassinate him there and then The bodies of three dead Palestinians as Patsy's, and this plot was uncovered,↗

4:53:33Speaker 23and, by Victor, Ostrovsky, who ex-Massad agent, former Massad agent, who wrote two books, The, By Way of Deception and the Other Side of Deception, two books. You can get 'em both on archive.org. Victor Ostrovsky, very, famous ex-Mossad agent. He writes this, a-and in the first one, By Way of Deception, he talks about how the attack on the Marine Corps barracks in, in Lebanon in 1983 were basically an Israeli plot. Like, basically they had inside knowledge that it was gonna happen, and they didn't pass that information on to the Americans. And so then it kinda leaves you to ask, well, did they not, did they not just not give us the information, or did they also, maybe they had a little hand in orchestrating it too, you know, you never know what these guys. And, so that's in his first book, by way of deception, and the other one, in the other side of deception, he talks about this plot where Mossad was gonna assassinate, Bush at the Madrid peace conference because he had been strong arming, the Israelis over these settlements and over Amer- and↗

4:54:37Speaker 23over, They were gonna whack him, and they had this whole plot, and they had three Palestinian patsies in custody, they were gonna, you know, ship 'em up there, kill 'em, you know, have a big shootout basically, and leave their, you know, bullet-ridden bodies behind, and, and pin it on these disgruntled Palestinians. That's the plan, that was the plan, it was foiled. You can go read that, I posted about it on my timeline, but you can go read about it in The Other Side of Deception by Victor Ostrows So there was another attempted assassination of an American president. And so not only, so once that was foiled, then what they did was, then they, withdrew their support from George Bush and backed Bill Clinton. And now we know about all about Bill Clinton, drove Hale Boggs to the airport, covered for the Israeli Epstein, Iran Contra scheme out of Mena, Arkansas, he covered for that for, forever. And so he's their guy. we know he did all the Epstein Lolita Express stuff that he was into↗

4:55:34Speaker 23and so then they backed him in '92. And of course, that was the year they ran Ross, Ross, Ross Perot ran as a third party and actually split the vote, and that's what allowed Bill Clinton to win, because if you look at the vote totals, Bill Clinton didn't actually win a, a majority, he only won a plurality, and that was because-↗

4:55:51Speaker 24You, you think that they had something to do with Ross Perot, pulling out? I suspect,↗

4:55:56Speaker 23I've never really looked into it deeply, but if you look at the vote totals, So I- Oh yeah, for,↗

4:56:04Speaker 24for sure. I just didn't know, I didn't know what, what they had on Ross Pro because I specifically remember that my dad was a Ross Pro, Pro man, and he was so mad and so pissed because Ross Pro literally, like, without- Any prompting or anything like that, one day he just drops out and he's done.↗

4:56:24Speaker 23Well, if you recall, he went on Larry King a lot. Big appearances on Larry King. Larry King helped make Ross Perot, helped him with that national media campaign, and of course, from tonight, now we know all about Larry King.↗

4:56:34Ian MalcolmI was gonna say, you↗

4:56:35Speaker 23know, Larry King, and now we're connecting more dots. Even these, these spaces are great because, because I wouldn't, you know, now I'm connecting another dot. If you go back, I remember, 'cause I was I was 16 when Ross Perot, made that run, and dating myself there, but I, he went on Larry King, and big appearances on Larry King, and, you know, and now we know Larry King was possibly involved in the Edward Grant Stockdale assassination, and also involved in the Kennedy, the JFK assassination cover-up. If you guys, if you guys came in late and missed that, yeah, Larry King was involved in both of those. I was shocked, I just learned that recently, so that was new for me. and now we see maybe, maybe,↗

4:57:19Speaker 23this is one of the ways they were involved in the Ross Perot campaign, because the other time there was a major third party, spoiler, was in nineteen twelve, when they installed, Woodrow Wilson, when they ran, Theodore Roosevelt to split, the party, from William Howard Taft, and that gave the nineteen twelve election to, the Democrats and, and Wilson.↗

4:57:44Speaker 23Woodrow Wilson, and Woodrow Wilson, under his leadership, passed the sixteenth and seventeenth amendment, which is the, the income tax is the sixteenth amendment, and they took-- and they instituted direct election of senators, which, in the seventeenth amendment, which basically allowed the federal government to secede from the states. They passed the Federal Reserve Act and the Central-- and the, Internal Revenue Act, right? And, and basically what that, between those three things, the income tax, direct election of senators, kicking the states out from the national government, and then the IRS and the Federal Reserve, between those acts of legislation, what that did was it shifted the locus of power from the people in the state legislatures as the main check on the federal government or the main locus of power, it shifted that locus of power from the people in the state legislatures to big money. The big money cartel, big business and big banking, right? That's what happened in 1913. They shifted the locus of power from the people in the state legislatures to the Federal Reserve and the big business cartels and money, the money power. That's when money got into politics, big money got into politics in 1913. Prior to that, there was no money in Senate races because state legislatures appointed the senators. And if the sen-senators didn't do what the state legislator-legislators wanted, they just wouldn't run 'em again the next time around. So basically the states were sovereign entities, senators were their ambassadors in the national government, and the federal government couldn't do anything without the okay and say so of the state legislatures. It couldn't okay a federal budget, it couldn't okay a Supreme Court justice, it couldn't okay a foreign treaty, it couldn't take a shit without the approval of a majority of state legislatures, until 1913.↗

4:59:33Speaker 23That's when that changed.↗

4:59:34@joann_marieAnd also Wilson was blackmailed by some, Samuel Untermeier, was it Samuel?↗

4:59:41Speaker 23Samuel Untermeier, maybe, but Colonel Edward House was his handler. Bernard Baruch, the Jewish financier, was also heavily involved there. Woodrow Wilson had big Jews behind him, big Jewish power behind him. but anyway, the whole point is, is that they, they ran Theodore Roosevelt, 1912, to split the Republican Party, and that allowed Wilson to win. And then of course, we get the Federal Reserve, we get a runaway federal government, and we get World War One, and we get the Balfour Declaration. Everything lines up, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.↗

5:00:13Speaker 29Hey Sam, was that the same year that, William Randolph Hearst ran for office? 'Cause, 'cause now you're starting to talk about like the Battle of Citizen Kane and, and the battle between Orson Welles and Hearst. William↗

5:00:25Speaker 23Randolph Hearst. What year was that?↗

5:00:32Speaker 23let's see.↗

5:00:34Speaker 29I think it was that year, because I, I have a post in the pile that, that touches on it. So I have a link to the history DVD posted in, in the Battle of Morrison Wells. He failed to win the↗

5:00:46Speaker 23governor, he failed to win governor of New York in '05 and '09, or '06, yeah, and then he ran for president. he made a major effort in 1904 to, for the Democrat nomination, but he lost in 1904.↗

5:01:03Speaker 27So why'd, why'd the American people love JFK so much?↗

5:01:07Speaker 23'Cause he was assassinated?↗

5:01:12Speaker 27No, I mean like before that, he was like super popular, right?↗

5:01:14Speaker 23Well, he, he actually only won by the hair of his chinny chin chin, just by the skin of his teeth. He won, he beat Nixon by something like 120,000 popular votes total, and basically- The Chicago machine in Illinois basically, you know, it's popularly thought that they just stole those votes for him to put him over the top. It was a razor-thin margin, but, Kennedy actually-↗

5:01:41Speaker 23you know, he was young, he was vibrant, but, you know, Nixon was very charismatic and very powerful too. Like I said, when Kennedy, when, when Nixon won re-election in '72, it was the most popular, Republican landslide in history. Very popular man. forty-nine to one.↗

5:01:58Speaker 27Yeah, I was trying to ask him. Yeah, that's awesome. what about I mean, like his message, did they, were, did they like what he was saying? That's what I'm trying to tell↗

5:02:06Speaker 23you, it, it wasn't like it was overwhelming. What endeared, what has overwhelmingly endeared Kennedy to America is his assassination. That's why Congress was able to pass a lot of his legislative stuff after he died, after he was killed, because of the national trauma from the assassination. Before the assassination, he wasn't able to pass a large portion of his agenda. It wasn't, it wasn't as popular as you might think, because he wasn't as popular as you might think. Like I said, he barely won the presidency with like a hundred and twenty thousand popular votes total. That's not a lot, very razor-thin margin on the popular vote.↗

5:02:43Speaker 29So- Yeah, and one of, one of JFK's last, speeches before he got killed was talking about the secret societies,↗

5:02:52Speaker 29which obviously- that- Which obviously led, you know, to- You know, kind of the mysterious, killing of Stanley Kubrick of Eyes, Eyes Wide Shut in Hollywood, right?↗

5:03:03Speaker 23yeah. Now, Kubrick's another good, interesting one. He does Eyes Wide Shut, he reveals the secret societies of Hollywood, and then he dies. Did he spill the beans?↗

5:03:14Speaker 24Well, they, supposedly they cut about fifteen minutes out of that, out of the final. Final movie.↗

5:03:21Speaker 23Yeah, so that, that's another good, that's another one, that's another celebrity, perhaps an assassination, that people have been suspicious about that.↗

5:03:29Speaker 29yeah, and, I, I, I was wondering if I could jump in on, on, I, I've got the, I've got a prediction on who's gonna be next. So, so interestingly enough, I set out So this is Satan's Mind Virus, The Wizard of Oz, and The Keys to the Invisible Prison. It's an article that I posted in the Purple Pill. And so I set out to find out how our education system gets so corrupt. That was, that was just my premise of why I was writing this article. And just like in journalism, you know, you, you ha-- you have no idea where it's gonna lead you. But, I found-↗

5:04:12Speaker 29Yeah, well, I found three very interesting things. probably the most demented man I've ever researched, French philosopher Michel Foucault, who, was↗

5:04:29Speaker 29ultra-radical left, to leave it at that. But that's not-- that wasn't even the most interesting part. he is interesting, but- The fact that it was coming out of Harvard in 2022 is kind of a separate discussion, but it came out of, GFI think tank, from George Soros, through the '46 administration, and then, as I kind of followed through, you know, the article,↗

5:04:59Speaker 29you know, I run into Stanley Kubrick, Eyes Wide Shut, because of the- Men's trap that is laid at Harvard University, primarily at the mathematics department, where you're gonna find, you know, Larry Summers and all these other people, but so this led me to a failed blackmail attempt, and this is the most interesting part, on Dr. Eric Ross Weinstein, and he's got a revolutionary theory of geometric unity. So he recalls his, are you talking about↗

5:05:35Speaker 23Brett's brother, Eric Weinstein? Or is this a different Eric Weinstein?↗

5:05:40Speaker 29This is, this is, no, this is, unrelated Weinstein. This is, Dr. Eric Ross Weinstein.↗

5:05:48Speaker 23What year, what year, era, what year, where, when are we talking here?↗

5:05:52Speaker 29He's still alive right now, but I think he's gonna be the next missing scientist, is, is kind of what I'm getting to, but this was, this just happened a couple of years ago. well, not a couple of years ago, it had to have been, probably twenty twenty, twenty twen- or twenty nineteen, somewhere in there. I don't know, the, the link to the interview, which is on a diary of a CEO called "The Dark Truth About Epstein." So it had to have been what... So Jeffrey Epstein was arrested the second time in twenty nineteen, right? So it had to have been↗

5:06:28Speaker 29just prior to that. So he was already a convicted sex offender, I know that. But anyway, he reaccounts his,↗

5:06:40Speaker 29this, this setup. So somebody, he says somebody from JP Morgan set up the interview and said that you, you gotta meet this guy Jeffrey Epstein. So he had no clue who this guy was. And, so he meets with him, and he says that the hair on the back of his neck stood up. And so he was, he was currently going through the kind of a peer review process with his colleagues there at Harvard, at Harvard University with his revolutionary theory of geometric unity, which has to do with gravity. And we, we know that Jeffrey Epstein was very fas-fascinated with gravity and, and all these other things. Anyway, he, he got so spooked by the interview That he avoided the official peer review process with the Cope Council and had his work copyrighted like a play.↗

5:07:37Speaker 29And, so I, I would encourage everybody to take a look at this, because I believe, you know, with all the missing scientists that we have going on, obviously, Dr. Dr. Weinstein was targeted by JP Morgan and- Jeffrey Epstein. And so I, I believe this guy is gonna be the next missing, person or- Okay, so you made a↗

5:08:01Speaker 23prediction, this guy is gonna be the next guy to go missing.↗

5:08:04Speaker 29Yep. Yeah. So, anyway, just take a look at it, I think it's pretty fascinating, and I'll end there. And that's in the purple pill? It is, yeah, it's called Satan's Mind Virus, The Wizard Was, and The Keys to the Invisible Prison.↗

5:08:19Speaker 23Alright, everybody, if you're, if that sounds interesting to you, go down in the purple pill, follow True Maga, you know, go, go check that out. Sounds interesting. I do love predictions, putting a little skin in the game, putting a little reputation on the line. He↗

5:08:33Speaker 29also goes into details, he found out one of his, closest friend was a FBI informant. So this kinda reminded me of what happened to Ni-Nikola Tesla, right? Is that Nikola Tesla was defunded and, his work was stolen. And so this kinda seems like a repeat of history to me, because we got the same players involved, you know, most notably JP Morgan.↗

5:08:59Speaker 23Well, Trump's, father or grandfather, I believe, wasn't it Trump's father or grandfather was implicated in, Tesla, the Tesla files? Something? I think I heard that's↗

5:09:09Speaker 29correct, yeah. He was, he was one of the FBI investigators.↗

5:09:13Speaker 23Oh, yeah. Yep. And actually, you know, this is just out of nowhere, out of left field for whatever reason. We mentioned Seth Rich earlier tonight, and that was another assassination, right? And Seth Rich is Jewish? By the way, and they're, and they're withholding the Seth Rich files, which is, so that's just an aside popped into my head. We mentioned him, I'm just throwing that out there again. In the last year, they've withheld JFK files, Epstein files, USS Liberty files, and 9/11 files, and Seth Rich files. So,↗

5:09:47Speaker 23that's another, another interesting, assassination. But no, this sounds interesting about this, Eric Weinstein guy. So- Yeah, and,↗

5:09:59Speaker 29and so I can- I kinda did a continuation of Satan's mind virus based off what I found with French philosopher, Michael Foucault. Okay. And so that one's gonna be the mysterious creation of, of the invisible prison. So, you know, obviously the keys to the invisible prison, and then I go into the invisible prison, which, which is, which is, I believe, a,↗

5:10:28Speaker 29classified CIA operation that is active. So I don't know the official name of it, 'cause it hasn't been declassified.↗

5:10:39@joann_mariealright, thank you so much.↗

5:10:40Speaker 29So, thanks for↗

5:10:41Speaker 23Marga. Oh,↗

5:10:43@joann_mariethat's the, the, the tenth, the tenth mountain, Ting Tang.↗

5:10:47Speaker 23True↗

5:10:48@joann_marieMarga hasn't spoken↗

5:10:50Speaker 23yet. Oh, that was tenth. Yeah. I thought that was True Marga the whole time. No. Oh, I couldn't tell. On my, on my app, it says True Marga speaking, so like, the app sucks. Sorry. Yeah, it's okay. Go ahead, True, go ahead, True Marga.↗

5:11:02Speaker 27Yeah, just, yeah, quickly, thanks a lot for, that, that was great info, you guys. so I'd like to do a space, and you guys will think this is funny, but↗

5:11:15Speaker 27It is funny, but we could do a whole separate space on it, maybe. But if you woke up one morning and you only had, I'll just kinda lighten up the space a little bit, and you had only two choices to run our country, you only had two choices, it was either gonna be the Jews or the Blacks, which one would you guys choose?↗

5:11:36@joann_marieI'd choose the Blacks.↗

5:11:41Speaker 23If I could deport every Black or every Jew, I would deport every Jew.↗

5:11:47Speaker 25I would deport every black 'cause if you deported all the blacks, then you could actually vote in a white nationalist leader that would deal with the, the JQ.↗

5:11:54Speaker 23now you still have Jews though, so no. Overruled.↗

5:12:00Speaker 23I don't know, Ian, we've been at it long, we've, we've, we've done a couple last gasps here, maybe, maybe it's time to, pull the plug on this carcass, this corpse. Is Ian in bed? No, he's there. Is he there? Yeah, Ian.↗

5:12:15Speaker 26Hey, hey, hey, before, before we do that, Sam, what you know about Smedler, Smedler, Butler? Smedler, Butler. Smedler, Butler. Yeah, Smedler, Butler, in, in Haiti, man. You know, when they were, then the training, the training of the rifle team, my grandfather was on the Haitian rifle team, and, you're talking about, Gerald Ford and Nelson D. Rockefeller↗

5:12:42Speaker 26He was like, he was like the best sniper in the world in the '60s, but he was also a military attaché, an ambassador to, to, to France or to the US on behalf of France, and he was like always, like, you know, with Charles de Gaulle, was like, kinda like his right-hand man, like, you know, but, yeah, my grandfather was always around, around people, but they, they held my grandfather in, in a good regard, like, you know, for, for his Or his sharpshooter skills, you know, but that's, that's really all I know what's declassified and whatnot, but yeah, man, from '60 to '67, man, you know, those, those years where it's, a lot happened in those years, man, that, my grandfather was around a lot of it, and, like he was a colonel in the Haitian military, but he was the best sniper in the world in the '60s, you know, but, Yeah, that's all I got. But, sure.↗

5:13:29Speaker 23That's pretty cool. Well, it sounds like you know more about that particular thing than me. you know, I, I've read, Smethil Butler's War Is a Racket, of course. I, I know about the business plot, I've read about that. I know of his decorations in World War One, but- You know, outside of that stuff, I'm not, like, I'm not an expert on Smedley Butler's, you know, lifetime and, and his, you know, total corpus of work, to↗

5:13:56Speaker 26be honest.↗

5:14:11Speaker 23Yeah. I know that, but, past that, I, I don't really know too much, too much about it past that, to be honest with you. So-↗

5:14:23@joann_marieAnd I just want to- I thought the question was if, who would you rather have running your country, not deported out of your country. So that's why I chose blacks, because I wouldn't, I wouldn't never choose Jews running any country.↗

5:14:36Speaker 23Yeah, yeah, totally. rather have incompetence than, deviance. How about that? Incompetence over malice.↗

5:14:49Speaker 23So. Yeah. yeah. I, I, there's-- Now, just so we close, by the way, Major- Major, I↗

5:14:56Speaker 30need a, I need to push back majorly upon that, Sam, because my problem with that, that I, I would contend- Or that it would, that my contesting point would be, is that a deviant can still pretend to play dumb. So how do you know the difference between somebody who's dumb and... Yeah, I actually have a tweet about, I actually have a↗

5:15:14Speaker 23tweet about, I actually have a tweet about this. Yeah. Yeah. Actually, I have a tweet about this. It's called Parker's Razor, I even named it, because it, it replaces Hamlin's Razor. Hamlin's Razor says, never attribute to malice that which can be explained adequately explained by incompetence. And actually, I think that's wrong when it comes to, the public tit. I think it's, you should actually, I don't know why incompetence should be preferred over malice when both are human forces at play. I think that people who, intend malice and, and who are full of malice hide behind incompetence. And so, my razor, my theorem or razor, which I've replaced that with, is never attribute to incompetence that which can be, explained by My, malice. So, that's my opinion, and I've tweeted about it before.↗

5:16:04Speaker 23So, I think when it comes to, we see in the public sector here, these, a lot of these people who seek power are easily corrupted, or they're already corrupted, that's why they're installed. now, they might be incompetent too, but for me, the more important aspect is that they're compromised and, and, they're dirty. That's the more important. That's what's more important. An incompetent person↗

5:16:26Speaker 23We can deal with that. So then my, my other push, maybe we can't deal with is, is malice, that's, that's the problem.↗

5:16:32Speaker 30Well, then a, a third wheel or again, a major pushback of mine would be then at, at that point, the major question that I, I have to push back with is that, who can you really place your trust in fully at all then, whatsoever?↗

5:16:49Speaker 23Well, that's why we need to take our, our country and our government back, and that's, that's a completely different space that has nothing to do with assassination. Again, this is an assassination space, so to not get us too far off, happy to have that space, but that is a completely different question, completely different topic, and it requires a lot of unpacking. So interesting question, not the purpose of this space.↗

5:17:11Speaker 30I still think it plays into assassination space. Well, that's, that's,↗

5:17:14Speaker 23that's, that's great that you think that, but This is an assassination space. We're not, this isn't a theory about how to, you know, run our government better, space. So, okay, so↗

5:17:24Speaker 30Donald Trump, so Donald Trump is a,↗

5:17:27Speaker 23no. Like, some people just can't take a hint. Like, we're not, like, we're at the end of the space, we're trying to wrap it up, we're not trying to open up a theory of, like, a new theory of government, you know what I mean? It's like, what are we doing here?↗

5:17:38Speaker 27Sorry. Just on, on Charlie Kirk really quick. Yeah. is it a, do you think it's a bullet or that, that thing on his chest, the microphone?↗

5:17:48Speaker 23I don't know. the exploding microphone, exploding necklace, bullet, through the ear, bullet through the throat, in my opinion, all of those, all of those different theories and explanations all have strengths and weaknesses. And I don't think we have time to get into all of them, but they all have strengths and weaknesses. There's no, for me, there's no clear-cut,↗

5:18:14Speaker 23one that, is totally obviously,↗

5:18:19Speaker 23you know, obviously more, you know, just takes, just so obvious that it just wipes out all the other options, let's just put it that way. They all have, they all have strengths, they all have problems, every one of them.↗

5:18:30@joann_marieAnd I posted in the, in the thread, your, your thread on, on the assassination of, and it's, I was skimming through it and it's very interesting, so check it out, guys.↗

5:18:43Speaker 23So, yeah, let's, so let's, let's do a little housekeeping. We have up in the jumbotron, up in the nest, we have the, the mega RFK assassination thread. You're gonna wanna read that, bookmark it, I promise you you won't be disappointed, it is mega awesome, I do say so myself, probably one of the best threads I've ever done in the, the history of my Twitter.↗

5:19:03Speaker 23it's gonna summarize a lot of stuff we talked about tonight, you're gonna learn a lot of other things that we didn't talk about tonight. really fascinating stuff, so I really encourage you to look at the RFK assassination thread. Then the next one, so bookmark it, you know, like it, whatever, interact with it if you want so that you can come back to later. Then we've got RFK Junior illegally moving↗

5:19:27Speaker 23I quote, I, I use, I quote tweet, Jake Shields' tweet to start it, but if you keep scrolling down, it turns into a thread. that one's pretty interesting too. then, let's see, what else we got?↗

5:19:41Speaker 23another tweet about Mary Kennedy, that's his wife who's found dead in the barn. and Jeffrey Epstein commenting, "Oops," or "Whoops," when he finds out that she's dead. So that's pretty suggestive now that we know how he uses "Whoops," right? that's up there in the nest. What else we have up there in the nest? We have,↗

5:20:07Speaker 23Oh, then we have the, Jordana Cutler quote, how the Zionists, will ban anybody that says the Zionists will ban people for their speech, basically. If you say that we ban you for your speech, we're gonna ban you for that. and then we have a tweet about, President McKinley's, monetary policy, which, we talked about tonight a couple times, we touched on that with the McKinley assassination.↗

5:20:33Speaker 23Like I said, if you wanna search my timeline, you can find the Buddy Holly post about the Buddy Holly assassination. I've made many, many threads on the Vietnam War and how that was a Jewish plot for the Jewish global empire. several threads on that. I did a massive thread on the Martin Luther King assassination as well. That's not up in the nest, but you can go find that if you poke around on my timeline and search for Martin Luther King or MLK,↗

5:21:04Speaker 23you'll eventually find that.↗

5:21:07Speaker 31But, okay, Sam, Sam, great show tonight, Ian, Joanne, knock it out of the park. Sam, I, I listened last hour, maybe hour, did you cover George Patton at all? We did. We covered Patton. Oh, shit. Okay, I'll, I'll hit the, I'll hit the replay button then or the replay. No, that's okay.↗

5:21:26Speaker 23And, and again, so to end like we started, our intent was not to give you every fact and every angle of every one of these assassinations, we don't have the time for that. What we wanted to do was sort of wet your appetite and give you enough of a glimpse to, to one, give you things to go run down on your own to pique your curiosity, number one. So now you can go do your own research on these things now that you're aware of them. But number two, to present another side to these things, because we live in a time of tremendous propaganda and tremendous lies, and the twentieth century might be the greatest century of lies in the history of mankind, I don't know, you know? And↗

5:22:09Speaker 23we've been grown up with school, media, entertainment, government, you know, what have you, constantly reinforcing narratives a certain way. So our intent tonight was not to give you a balanced perspective of these things. Our intent was to give you a heavily, a, a, a perspective that's heavily weighted in the opposite direction from what you've been given. Basically, trying to fill in all the gaps that you haven't been given. And now you can take in all those filled gaps and all the information that you already had, and go do your research and combine all that together, and maybe you come up with a better idea of history for yourself than what you already had. But we didn't wanna water it down, we wanted to give you a lot of the facts in an unbalanced way, because you've already been getting an unbalanced story. So to counterbalance that, we give you, we give you a lot of the stuff in the other direction. Does that make sense to everybody? So that's what, you know,↗

5:23:05Ian Malcolmthat's Of that, a-and I, I, I'd be really curious for your color commentary on this, right? So on one, one aspect was, was you giving, and, and you're right, we certainly gave a, a heavily, dose of bias in favor of the, the Jewish supremacy angle and, and Jewish involvement in a lot of these assassinations.↗

5:23:27Speaker 23And, and that's because that's the, that's the piece that's left out of everything. So that's the piece we have to give you back. Now that you have the piece back, now you go complete the puzzle, right? But that's the piece that people don't have, right? That's the piece that's always left out.↗

5:23:41Ian MalcolmWell, it is, and, and not only that, but, but, the other piece is, and I, I, I, I'm curious again, Sam, for your thoughts on this, which is that in addition to the Jewish involvement, which you've illustrated in every single one of these scenarios, there's also the world and the way It kind of makes sense, and what I mean by that is, you know, we, we, we take the story that we're given, and we walk through the world, and we're like, "Ah, I guess, yeah, that happened," and then they, they never could figure out who got JFK, and I guess maybe it was the CIA. And there's all these loose ends. And when you go deep enough into the JQ, and you look back at history, and you start re-evaluating all of these events, not only do all the events have a different, perhaps trigger↗

5:24:30Ian MalcolmYou also understand the, the macro level of the why. What, what would have been the purpose of killing all of these politicians, of kill, killing MLK, of killing Rockwell, right? And of killing McKinley. And you get this much more, at least in my, in, in my opinion, I'm sure everybody's here, you get a much more reasonable and, and, you get an understanding of the world that actually makes sense, because otherwise Everything feels a little bit off, and the reason it feels off is because you're living in a system that's built on lies, that's trying to obfuscate the obvious truths that we've uncovered, right? And so you basically, you wove this web discussing all of these individuals that includes the founding of the Federal Reserve, the World War One, World War Two, and their involvement to some extent, the cultural changes that took place, the need to begin all of, you know, essentially what would ultimately become the, the neo- Right? All of this makes complete sense when you illustrate it through the lens of what you just provided, that again, each of the events isn't just exposed, but the entire origin and the intent of, of this whole macro history makes a lot more sense.↗

5:25:44Speaker 23No, to-- No, that's, I, I appreciate that. Yeah, you're very flattering, but, no, i-it's true. Recently, I was talking to somebody about the Vietnam War and about the Jewish angle. And You, like, you could just see the scales fall from his eyes, 'cause he, he was a boomer. And, you know, boomers, if you ask them, "Why'd we fight the Vietnam War?"↗

5:26:09Speaker 23A lot of them will just say, "I don't have no idea, " like that was just dumb. Like, they won't have any idea, they'll see it's pointless or stupid, or they won't ultimately know why, or, you know, they might, maybe they'll say, "Well, we're trying to fight communism, " but then it was just like, but then they wouldn't fight to win, and it just kind of dr- kept dragging on. Like, you'll get a lot of different answers from boomers, but nobody w-will really have a really solid take↗

5:26:38Speaker 23And laid it out to him in detail. It just like, the scales dropped from his eyes, and it just made sense to him for the first time in his life, you know? And, for me, that's how a lot of these things are. I've been saying for a long time that once you're aware of the Jewish question and, a-a-and the Jewish element in history, now you go back and you study your history,↗

5:27:03Speaker 23knowing the names, understanding how they operate. Right? And you go back and read history, and all of a sudden history comes alive in a different way. And, and now things make more sense. Like, you know, like for instance, you know, Jews, basically conspired to assassinate the Tsar in 1881, Tsar Alexander II. And that led to a bunch of Jews fleeing the Russian Empire from the 1880s to the early 1900s.↗

5:27:31Speaker 23And those Jews fled to Germany? And to the United States. And to some other places, too. But then they went to Germany, and they tried to overthrow Germany. Then they came to the United States, and, and founded Communist Party USA, you know? And then, and then, and then they pushed for, you know, the civil rights, agenda, you know? And in Germany, they tried to lead, lead multiple Bolshevik uprisings, and that led to pushback from, the National Socialists and Hitler. You know? And so like, once you understand where↗

5:28:10Speaker 23it's coming from, and you see how these things are connected, like it's literally the same, the same people that Hitler was fighting that were overthrowing America in the '50s and '60s, the same people, from the same place. Right? Same elements, the same radical element. Now that you know that, you can see that it makes sense. Things make sense, they fall into place. You know, it's not just a bunch of disjointed history that's just kind of happening in pieces. Now there's a narrative that, like, makes it make sense. You know, that's not to say that every-- People will say, "Well, you're, you're just looking at, like, you're just blaming everything on the Jews." And I'm like, "No, what I'm doing is I'm giving you the↗

5:28:53Speaker 23You know, the JFK assassination is another great example. People have argued for decades, was it the CIA, was it the mob? You know, you know, organized crime, was it LBJ? You know? And the answer is yes, it was. But what ties them all together? What ties LBJ and the mob and the CIA? What ties all of that together? It's the Jewish element.↗

5:29:21Speaker 23The relationship that LBJ had with the Jews, he's even Jewish himself probably, we didn't mention that, but he was probably Jewish himself, and he certainly was all jewed up. A lot of Jewish benefactors, a lot of, Jewish money behind him, a lot of Jewish power behind him. And then obviously, you know, Jewish mobsters were involved,↗

5:29:43Speaker 23right? Jack Reuben Stein was a Jewish mobster, Meyer Lansky. You know, some others as well. And then you have the CIA, James Angleton, who was the head of the Israel desk for over twenty years at the CIA. The only person in the US intelligence community officially authorized to interface with the Israelis for twenty years, just James Angleton, one guy, unsupervised.↗

5:30:09Speaker 23So that, so the, the thing that ties LBJ, the CIA, and the mob theories of the JFK assassination toget- together is Jewish power. That's what ties them all together. It's like a little cherry on top, the little, little master control switch that just, that ties them all together, puts them in a nice little bow, makes them all make sense.↗

5:30:29Speaker 23And so that's what I- Tried to give people tonight is, here's the piece that's been left out of everything, that you're not supposed to see. In fact, A-Americans are trained not to see this. I was reading a book last summer about the 17th Amendment, about how, you know, the 17th Amendment was instituted. And in that book, the author mentioned,↗

5:30:54Speaker 23a congressman, I forget his name now, he was the first socialist, the first elected socialist congressman in America. And he had a funny little name, and had a little suspicion, and I went and looked him up, and he was a Jew. So the, the first elected socialist in America was a, was a Jew. And that made sense, right? So it, it makes sense, it made sense. But like she didn't call that out, she didn't even draw any attention to it. And, and, and-↗

5:31:26Speaker 23You know, it's interesting, you go look at the Tucker Carlson, Daryl Cooper, Epstein episode from last summer on Tucker's show, it's like a couple hours or whatever it was, and they managed to name, like, I don't know, twenty five or thirty Jews or so without mentioning that any of them were Jews. Yeah? And I don't know if that's intentional or unintentional, but we are trained in America, we've been trained to not notice Jews, to not see their Jewishness,↗

5:31:57Speaker 23right? To not see that. Like, we've been trained that that's antisemitic if you, if you even see that or you even notice it, that's, that's antisemitic. And so people for decades have been trained with that upbringing. You're trained not to see it on TV. You're not, you're not supposed to see that every talking, all the six talking heads on this panel show are all Jews, you know, on this Fox News show or this CNN show, like all the five people on the panel, they're all Jews. You're not supposed to see that. You're trained not to see that, right? And if you do, you're an anti-Semite. And so we have to drop these scales from our eyes and be able to see the Jewish↗

5:32:34Speaker 23But it is an essential element that's involved, and if we don't see it, history doesn't make sense. And if you want history to make sense, if you want to understand the truth, you have to be able to see that piece of the puzzle. If you want to put the puzzle together, you have to have that piece. Otherwise, you won't have a, a puzzle that makes sense.↗

5:32:54Ian MalcolmSam, that is so brilliantly stated, and I, I just wanna bring, two, notes, to people's attention, I put them up into the nest. the first is from Asma, who just shared the space, and quote tweeted it saying, "Once in a while, you'll find gems among the spaces on X. Listen and take notes to this one." And, shared that, Sam, with, with you there. And I mean, this has been an absolute masterclass. It's one of those places I'm so thankful it's recorded. Well, I appreciate↗

5:33:31Speaker 23that's a great quote tweet, by the way, whoever tw-tweeted that, that I appreciate that. That's great feedback, and I really, I really appreciate that.↗

5:33:39Ian MalcolmYeah, and the second, I just wanna bring attention to, and this is just a meme, for Goy Maxing, and, I, I wanted to bring everybody's attention to that. This is a account that has been, in this movement for a long time, had a account that was basically hacked In the hack, the hackers set up two-factor authentication, and so now as a result, when they try to get back into their account, even when X tries to reset it, they're sending the reset to the person that hacked the account. So they're trying to get back off the ground. if you look over the content, you guys might be familiar, might be able to guess who that might be, but wanted to bring a lot of attention to them, as we always do, to try and prop up our friends and those people that are on this journey with us, especially those that are, let's say in parts of the world where free speech is ever being infringed upon more and more and more heavily. so I wanted to bring attention to that, help them kinda get that account back, up and growing. but that being said, I know that we do have a couple hands with Steele, who- Oh, there we go, we got, and Free, Free Johnny↗

5:34:47Speaker 26Deuce, man, Free Johnny Deuce.↗

5:34:51Speaker 28Yeah, hey, Sam, you, this is a↗

5:34:55Speaker 23steal? Am I stealing a steal?↗

5:34:57Speaker 28Yeah, this is, you gave us a great segue into what I wanted to say about the other side, and I think that, I'm, I'm more of a listener for the most part, although Malcolm has been very good with my accounts to get me into, discussions groups which you might wanna get into, but 'cause my, my, mine is with the Jews and going back to the Knights Templars and some research I'm doing there, but the segue is, is that, you know That you do offer the other side of this that people don't listen to, and you, the one thing I liked you said all night is, do your own research and make up your mind. You're just trying to show the other side, and that's why, I guess the segue is, is that's why I follow Malcolm and, Joann and a lot of the, speakers up here, is because that's what he does, and it's, it's just so, like, there's years ago, there was somebody like a mentor to me said, "Your, My needs to like look at everything as, and, and get a matrix of understanding, like not the matrix like that, but there's just a grid work of understanding and, and look at all sides, even the things you don't like, I read↗

5:36:07Speaker 28stuff by liberals, I'll even stuff by the far right and whatever. But Malcolm is a, and is a, sorry, Malcolm Forcing you to, to have an opinion, but anyway, I just appreciate this. This is one of the better spaces I've heard in a long time.↗

5:36:39Speaker 23That's great feedback, I really appreciate it. I don't do a lot of spaces anymore, so, it's nice to know that this one's well received and that people are liking it. I, just as you guys know, this is, this is the culmination of years and years worth of effort and research, and there's always more to know. Like, I just learned that Larry King stuff last week.↗

5:36:58Speaker 28Hey, Sam, by, by the way, I actually, a little bit older than, than, I have an older picture of my other account, Ricardo, but this, this account was banned for a long time. I finally got it back 'cause I had to authenticate, you know, the two-factor thing and all that went on. I finally got it back. I had to work through- ex, which they did do. It took me a couple months, but,↗

5:37:20Speaker 28believe it or not, I do have a relationship or I did, years ago with, Michael Collins Piper, and, I know Ryan kind of, Dawson has, has been kind of a disciple of him. So I'm, I've got a lot of his old tapes, back, going back to the eighties and nineties, or mostly the nineties. and so he was kind of the pioneer on this area,↗

5:37:45Speaker 28if you don't know. No, I totally agree with↗

5:37:47Speaker 23that. Michael Collins Piper is incredible, and the rest of us in, that are in this space, s- like we stand on his shoulders. He's the sh- he's the giant whose shoulders we stand on. When it, when it comes to this stuff, no question. No question. He sets the bar. He's set it high, and, we're still drafting off of his wake, to be honest. I mean, we still are,↗

5:38:06Speaker 28you Just to discuss his books, but anyway, I'll, I'll, I'll, land here, but just thank you for so much because I, I think you know when I mention him that, that I'm, I'm tracking with everything you're talking about.↗

5:38:21Speaker 23Oh, absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. Like, and like we said earlier, we could've, I could've spent four hours on the Martin Luther King assassination, don't have time for that. just wanted to whet your all's whistle, and you can go back and listen to my old Martin Luther King speeches, I No, Michael Collins Piper did some really important work on that one too, especially obviously JFK,↗

5:38:41Speaker 23incredible, incredible work. I do encourage people to go listen to his stuff, where you can find it, bit shoot, wherever it's at, you know, some, some of it's here on Twitter, archive dot org, read his book, Final Judgment. I'd also encourage people, if you, if you're curious about JFK, RFK, and James Forrestal, go read a book by Laurent Goino.↗

5:39:03Speaker 23And, he's a Frenchman. and it's called The Unspeakable Truth, about the Kennedy assassination. And, he's on Twitter here, you can find him, g u y e n o t friend of mine, we've, we've become friends. He wrote a magnificent little book on those three assassinations as well. He draws heavily from Michael Collins Piper, but from many, many other sources as well.↗

5:39:29Speaker 23so I would encourage you guys to follow him and, and go find his book too. but yeah, no, there's always more to know, always more to learn, and certainly, appreciate that feedback and that perspective and, yeah, Michael Collins Piper is a top G, totally top G in the assassination space, for sure. Goy, Goy Maxing. What's↗

5:39:50Speaker 32up? I just wanted to say hi and thank you so much, Ian, for, helping me out here. And Sam, we meet again. Nice to see you. Nice to hear you. I haven't seen you or heard you in a space in ages. So, yeah. Yeah. I just wanted to say thank you for trying to build me up again. Yes, I did get hacked. Yes, the bot or whatever it was called itself Elon Musk and started spamming heaps of Elon shit, and now X won't do anything.↗

5:40:17Speaker 32Hundred K account gone, we'll start again, and, yeah, the name's a bit- Wait, what was your last↗

5:40:21Speaker 23account? What was your last account?↗

5:40:23Speaker 32You're, you, I was your admin for your tele- Yeah, that's↗

5:40:26Speaker 23what I thought. Yeah, okay. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. That's, it's been a while since I've heard from you. I know!↗

5:40:30Speaker 32That's why I was like, "Hey, I got lucky, "and I actually got to speak to you in a space. "But, yeah, thanks so↗

5:40:45Speaker 23much↗

5:40:46Speaker 32And they send you a bunch of links to forms that just don't, they're broken links even, they don't even work. So, yeah. Is this GoyMax? Yeah, we don't have free speech here, but we still have humor, so that's why I decided to make my name GoyMaxing, 'cause if they take away comedy from us, then we're well and truly fucked. For sure. But, thanks for recording this, Ace. It sounds very, very interesting, so I'm probably gonna have to listen back to it. We, to be↗

5:41:13Speaker 23honest, I think it takes us a little while to get going, maybe. I don't know, I, I didn't, wasn't here for the first twenty or thirty minutes, and then when I came in, then we kinda beat around the bush for a little while. But once we got going, I think we really started cooking, didn't we?↗

5:41:25Ian MalcolmNo, we did. And, it's funny that you But, it, it was, I mean, Sam, this is wild, and what we're gonna have to do, and, and two things, one, Joanne sent me a note, I know that Mr. Truth Teller has opened up his, his daily space, so, I'll be bringing this one to a conclusion, but for anybody that wants to continue listening, he's gonna be covering the situation with Iran, as he always does, along with a whole bunch of other kind of, day-to-day pieces of the news, so certainly↗

5:42:06Ian MalcolmSo Ian was also mentioning, so we're gonna do that space on Kurt Cobain, on his killer, with again, somebody that was at the bedside of the person that basically knew all the ins and outs of the case and relayed a whole bunch of information. So should be really interesting. We'll also in that one talk about Chris Cornell, Chester Bennington, a whole bunch of these other folks that were involved in the music industry that, some would say had maybe more mysterious deaths than they should have. And Sam- If I'm not mistaken, is it Chester Bedingfield that's, that's connected to the Podesta's? Is that right?↗

5:42:41Speaker 23I believe so, allegedly. Yes. Like, like he's allegedly John Podesta's son or something maybe. They look, has a very strong resemblance. so I think the allegation is it might be John Podesta's son or bastard son or something along these lines. before we close, I just wanted to remind everybody that I am being sued by the girlfriend of Cash Patel for five million dollars. And while I've got you here,↗

5:43:08Speaker 23I'm raising money for my legal defense fund, and you can find a link to that in my Twitter profile. If you go to my flow page in my Twitter profile, it, it links to all, all my stuff, my GiveSendGo, Venmo, CashApp, PayPal, crypto, all that, all those things, buy me a coffee, multiple ways, you can contribute to my legal defense fund. So if, if you have a few extra dollars and wanna help my battle, against these people trying to steal- My free speech and, and y'all's free speech. I would appreciate any support you could give,↗

5:43:44Speaker 23and, that's, again, that's at the link in my Twitter profile.↗

5:43:48Speaker 28Hey, I'll do that, but one, and I'll shut up. The, the last thing I was gonna say, do you guys like the space is recorded as, I'm sure most of you do, but do you know how to bookmark it so you can go back to it later? If you don't, just click on the purple pill, and then once you do that↗

5:44:07Speaker 28The button all the way to the right.↗

5:44:09Ian MalcolmYep,↗

5:44:10Speaker 29the bookmark button.↗

5:44:11Ian MalcolmNo, that's a great call out, and, and, and Sam, on that, in addition to people, I, I certainly wanna bring attention to that. Again, that's in his bio, so if you click on his profile, you'll see that right up there next to the follower count. but I also just wanted to quickly comment, what we covered here today, Sam mentioned that this is, this is basically the culmination of immense amounts of research that he's done on all All of these individual events to be able to recall them straight off the top of his head, which is, it's, it's truly remarkable the history that you've been able to, to absorb, and this is essentially, it's like a master's class at this point in history, right? I, I, I feel like all of us were able to sit in a lecture room with, with one of the most informed individuals literally on earth on these subjects, and so I just wanna give him, you know, the, the highest of kind of, i- essentially↗

5:45:05Ian Malcolmto, to, Of expertise that you have, the amount of work that you've done, the depth of all of the research that helped you to put together the threads that not only do you recall, but you also had to unearth. and I mean, Sam, there, there's few people that have this amount of, of breadth and depth on all of these subjects, and I, I, I just wanna thank you for not only this space and for all of this information, but for everything that you've been doing in this movement as part of, of kind of this truth-seeking adventure, and you really are a hero↗

5:45:37Speaker 23Well, that's way too kind, but I appreciate it. couldn't have done it without a lot of other people, and honestly, we couldn't have had this space without all of you, right? We got hundreds of people in the space throughout the night, and it took every one of you to do that, and I always appreciate that. I always appreciate any, attention or help or interaction you guys give my account or, or my material, and so, you know, I appreciate you guys spending your night, your evening with me. it's, it's a two way↗

5:46:07Speaker 23I, I do truly do this work, for two reasons. Number one, I'm driven by my own curiosity, but I also have, you know, I just-- I have this compulsion, this need to, like, learn the truth and share it with people. you know, it's just, it's just me. Like, other people have gifts and talents and skills and predilections and urges and whatever. And for whatever reason, one of mine is I just like to learn things and then share it with, share what I learned with people. That's, I love doing that, and, and I appreciate you giving me that outlet here tonight, and I appreciate all of you listening, participating, retweeting the space. And by the way, when we close the space, if you haven't retweeted it, please retweet it because it is recorded, and I've learned, Ian, and you probably learned this too, about↗

5:46:49Speaker 23about fifty to a hundred percent, as many people as listen to the space live will listen to it on the replay. And so, if, you know, if you guys retweet the space even at the end, people will come along, find it, bookmark, and listen to the recording later, and that-- so more people will hear this if you still retweet the space even here at the end, even after we end. Retweeting the space will be very helpful. So I, I would ask you to do that. I'd ask you to retweet the space↗

5:47:17Speaker 23and, Listen to this space, but it will almost double, if you retweet it, you know, 'cause they'll listen to it on the recording. So again, thanks for giving me the time, thanks for spending your evening with me, thanks for appreciating what I do, and, you know, I'm always here, and, and we'll just, we'll just keep pushing, we'll keep fighting, and we'll keep educating, and,↗

5:47:37Speaker 23One person, one person at a time.↗

5:47:40Ian MalcolmAnd Sam, one person at a time. One, one person at a time, one day at a time, one truth at a time. And how wild is it to be in a space with you, Sam, and, and to hear new truths that you're bringing to some of these scenarios that you've uncovered, and the Larry King element here was just That was this wild to me, it's the first time I heard you in a space talking about Frank Mangowitz, and I was so kind of awestruck with what you had uncovered that I, I, I remember I made a, a little montage of the video feed that, that basically backed up all the things that you were saying, 'cause it was-- it's so wild to see all of these threads and to see one guy who's connected with this assassination, and then the movie about it, and the, the movie about the assassination of that person's brother, who then, like we've talked the removal of yet another president, in the case of Nixon, right? So the, these individuals that have just weaved their way through all of this, it's, it's wild to learn. And so, like you said, just another day, another adventure, we're gonna continue doing what we can to expose the truth, to bring it to everybody. And I'm always just so humbled and honored, whether it's with Sam or everybody else that's in these spaces, that's on this journey with us, it's out of curiosity, right? The, the, the urge↗

5:48:57Ian MalcolmWe're in and to help others essentially bring attention to so that they can see awareness of it, right? And so as always, I just, I wanna thank, Sam, I wanna thank you so sincerely much. I wanna thank Joanne for being in here. I know she's gonna go from this space over to Truth to help him run that, and I, I bring attention to that not just so people can prospectively go over there, afterwards and to support his work, but also just to call out how diligent and dedicated she is to this effort, and she's absolutely- Incredible when it comes to co-hosting these spaces, she puts in a ton of time, ton of work, and is always the most positive person on the planet. So I just wanna give a lot of love to her, the incomparable Mr. Sam Parker, who is a researcher, an educator, he's a professor on the JQ, just an absolute hero, and to everybody like he was saying that was listening in, that participated, doesn't matter if you came up and you spoke or you shared something, the Purple Pill, or you just listened to educate yourself so you can try to↗

5:49:58Ian Malcolmand with that being said, as always, good morning, good evening, good afternoon, good night wherever you might be in the world, but certainly God bless for everything that you are, God speed on everything that we are doing, and we will certainly see you all in the next conversation.↗