@genxgirl1994 Explains @gabbylovesusa’s Bombshell Data Drop

3:20Ian MalcolmFor the mission impossible that is trying to understand what is going on with all this nonsense, which I know that you've been doing a ton of work and research on, so very excited for what is gonna be a little bit smaller of a space than we normally would do, but nonetheless diving into an extremely important topic, which is ironically something I find myself in, and I, I say that, because unbeknownst to me, you sent a note, and apparently, I, I've, I've- I apologize, everybody. I didn't know my name was Ahmed, and↗

3:55Ian MalcolmI didn't know that I'm actually, I, I suppose a sixty-year-old, Middle Eastern person, or at least that's what, it seems like the White House is suggesting. And so I'm gonna be very curious, Gen X girl, for your thoughts on what exactly it was that Gabriella, uncovered. The recent data drop, I know that of course her post went viral, but that more recently, all of this- This has come, to light. Apparently, this all went-- I don't know if it was on Dropbox or where you found this, but, but that yours truly has found their way into it. and I'm very curious for both your thoughts on, on all of this as a backdrop, then also what it is that they might be doing, and if, kind of the, one of the pieces I'm gonna be most curious about are your thoughts on whether or not this is incompetence and ignorance by the very people that we would suggest are extremely capable? or if this is some kind of disingenuous misrepresentation that is being intentionally done for some ulterior motive. And so I know that we've got maybe a somewhat condensed clock with you, so I wanna turn things right over to you and, and, and let you begin to unpack what is the impossible mission of trying to understand the both surveillance state, the incompetence of, and perhaps the overwhelming nature thereof.↗

5:16Speaker 1Yeah, no, it's, it's great. yeah, she actually, just so that everybody knows, she posted today, a link to her Substack where she's uploaded the full document, cache. So for anybody that's interested in looking at it, I would definitely, encourage you to look at, Gabrielle, I'm gonna- Butcher her last name. Do you know how to pronounce it?↗

5:50Speaker 1it's C U C C I A.↗

5:52Ian MalcolmOh, you don't know off the top↗

5:53Speaker 1of my head. Yeah. And so, and I, and I reposted it on my page though, if anybody wants to see it. But, definitely very, very interesting. So I know that, you know, her screenshots before, went viral, but this is like the full cache of documents that she, screenshots so you can see the full reports. so I'm going through them. There A lot, in here.↗

6:18Speaker 1And, before I go into what I wrote the other day, the article that I worked with, Mel, whose handle is the Village Crazy Lady, who's also like a fabulous, like, researcher, and I respect her work a lot. So we actually wrote this article together, as we saw the, you know, the viral post, you know, that happened a few days ago, we started digging into the entities that were behind It, who was linked to it, I've certainly written, like a lot, a lot about, Israel foreign influence campaigns, the NGO networks that are in the US that operate, how our government, you know, takes these, you know, reports, puts them into, you know, bills, White House policy papers, executive orders, cite them, and yet what I've noticed is that there is a- Theme that, you know, that I am fairly confident is happening is that, you know, our elected officials are not reading these reports, that are developed by the Israeli lobby and, their quote-unquote NGOs that are, you know, funded and managed, you know, with Israeli operatives at the helm, not just regular citizens, but people who were in the Israeli government who are now operating in the US They're retired from the Israeli government and working here, people like, you know, their Minister of Strategic Affairs, their Chief Censor, their military Chief Censor, I mean, people very, very high up who were, whose previous job in the, you know, Israeli government was to censor information that is negative, about Israel, manipulate information↗

8:11Speaker 1psychological operations, their Hezbollah programs, all of it, right? So the entire like propaganda m-machine is now, you know, as they retire, they start to, you know, move over to the US and start working in these NGOs, you may or may not have heard of one that's called NCRI, they're behind a myriad of reports that, the, Congress and the White House cite all the time, They were behind, reports such as,↗

8:44Speaker 1"Christus King is Antisemitic." they had another one that, focused sp-specifically on the American right, that was called "Synagogue of Satan." they've also written extensively reports targeting the left, who's critical of Israel, things like, you know, "Qatar is brainwashing, you know, university students." that one really took off, you know, early in twenty twenty-four Or as the right at that time was less informed about, you know, Israel propaganda campaigns, so it really gained a lot of steam, if you guys remember the, student protests that were happening on the, campuses. One of the reports that fueled the hearings in early twenty twenty-four in the House of Representatives that went viral, was the NCRI report that claimed that Qatar was behind brainwashing- Millions, nineteen million US students that are registered, in university campuses, that, you know, majority of them are getting brainwashed by Qatar.↗

9:51Speaker 1they also were behind the report that claimed that TikTok was a Chinese spy operation. That was actually a report that was funded by a Zionist, tech millionaire, that they tried to use to ban TikTok initially under the auspices of Chinese spying. That didn't work, so they went to phase two, where the Israel, lobby just went full force, you know, TikTok is, you know, perpetuating antisemitism, and then as you guys all saw, you know, TikTok got banned, and then ultimately sold to the Elsons.↗

10:27Speaker 1so there's like a lot, a lot. Last year, they also re-p, produced a report that said that MAGA was being infiltrated by Iran and Russia. that was the one where they cited Nick Fuentes Perez and his followers, and they claimed in the re-uh, report that, you know, that his followers were all like Iranians and Russians and Pakistanis and blah, blah, blah So what is wrong with their reports? Nobody reads their reports, and it's a really big problem that we have in the, in both, Congress and the executive branch, because they cite these reports, but nobody actually is reading these reports. I have read the reports, and I'm confident that nobody with, you know, you know, any brain cells have read these reports, because if you read them and you look at the data that they're citing, it's bogus. It's complete- Exaggeration, there is, they provide little to no examples of how they come to their conclusions. They'll cite data, I'll give you one that's really like my favorite, in the, a report where they claim that Qatar was brainwashing students, they claimed that, you know, there was,↗

11:42Speaker 1That language that is anti-Semitic, and mind you, they all use the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which conflates criticism of Israel with, you know, antisemitism, right? So they claim that there was surges of anti-Semitic, language online that correlated with surges of protests on university campuses in twenty twenty-two, I believe, as either twenty-two, yeah, twenty-two, and they cite- Two specific dates, and they have this, like, you know, graphic that shows this spike, and they say that there's a direct correlation, and that, you know, foreign adversaries are putting, you know, these anti-Semitic,↗

12:26Speaker 1languages like, you know, free Palestine, Israel's committing genocide, they literally call this anti-Semitic language, right? Israel's committing genocide, Israel's an apartheid state, and they say that, you know, this is fueled By, you know, these like, you know, Qatari backed people and Islamists and foreigners and blah, blah, and it's causing, you know, people read this language online and then they go onto their university campuses and then they're causing riots, right? Well, I looked up those two dates to see what exactly happened of those two dates, right? W- one of the dates was, if, for anybody that, you know, remembers this, but there was a, Christian Palestinian journal Journalist, by the name of Shireen Abu Akleh that was, killed by the Israeli IDF, which caused worldwide condemnation. It was like a huge i-issue, because the Israelis, point blank, blank targeted her and shot her in the head as she was covering the story of what the IDF was doing, and then they lied about it, and then it got even worse because, you know, like they try to beat down like mourners during her, During her funeral, I mean, everything they did just took, you know, bad to worse and, you know, and fueled a lot of attention and a lot of reaction. As a result of that, there were protests all over the West and all over the Middle East over, you know, her, her mur-murder and the government's cover-up, Israeli government's cover-up. That was that day, right? And it was, it was literally two days back to back within a period of like one period, one week That they showed the spikes. That was the event. It was like literally a global event that happened. That was what caused all of those, you know, those, protests. However, in the report, that information is completely absent. They don't talk at all about that. What they claim is that the reason that happened spontaneously, they just make it sound like, you know, people are just walking around, you know, going about their business, and all of a sudden they see this anti-Semitic, anti-Israel stuff online, they lose their minds. Show up to school and start rioting, right? And for, you know, and, for the record, there weren't no riots, there were protests. so that's the kind of, data and, and reporting that NCRI produces. And when you look, like I said, if anybody even looks at it with any amount of scrutiny, they can immediately debunk it and, and realize that, you know, there, there's just straight out lies in these reports, and what they correlate as, as, you know, as Causes or reasons. So fast forward to the recent, data dump that happened with Gabrielle, she cited in, in her, you know, her post and then ultimately in the screenshots and in these reports that these entities work with, you know, it's an entity called, Vine and Fig Tree that was hired, to, you know, to basically-↗

15:39Speaker 1Excuse me, write, you know, propaganda, against, you know, claiming that online, there's an online effort to manipulate, you know, the US population, and the online effort is fueled by entities coming from, right, Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan, and that, you know, it's, it's all game. There's AI, there is a whole apparatus behind it, and they're doing all of this stuff But what they mainly do in these reports is they've compiled a list of influencers, particularly on the American right, who are critical of the Israeli government and ultimately critical of our own government for taking these positions on behalf of Israel that are detrimental to our country, to our government, to our standing in the world, to our economy, to, you know, the, the runaway debt, the spending, the military The wards, all of that, right? So they've accum-accumulated this report and these names that, you know, I'm sure you guys have seen that say, you know, these people are, you know, being paid and/or, getting boosted by foreign bots, foreign, actors, and, you know, and, you know, that they need to-- The ultimate, recommendation in all of these reports is that we need legislation In, in Congress, we need policies in the White House that go after these people. So it's a target, it's literally a plan that says, "Oh, look Here's all this report, here are all these people, and oh, by the way, who, who are the people that are actually developing these reports? It's entities like NCRI who they partner with, they actually recommend using them to go after, you know, and, and identify more of these, quote unquote, trends, right? But in the, in this cache, there's a hodgepodge of various different reports that are, developed by, you know, Vine, Fig, and Figtree. To other operatives, to some are just, you know, don't have any authors, associated with them, so the, you know, the, those are a little bit harder to identify who actually was behind developing this. But they all have the same message, and, you know, they talk about What I find is ironic is, you know, all of the patterns that we've seen happen, if any of you guys been paying attention to, you know, how the pro-Israel lobby, how, you know, pro-Israel influencers, you know, get boosted, get, you know, get, their, their narratives, you know, like, boosted by, either big accounts or a whole bunch of like, you know, bot armies. It's almost like they've taken what they do, like that's, you know, that That phrase that everybody uses, you know, every accusation is a confession. It's almost like they've taken their own, you know, recipe and planning for this stuff and are now attributing it to, "Oh, it's China, it's Russia, it's whatever." I'm not necessarily saying that these countries don't do that, I'm, I'm certain that they do, but from my three, four years online, I have not seen anybody do it the way Israel does, and yet Israel is completely absent from these reports. It's like they're nowhere to be found, nothing. So, you know, it's a clear, campaign to shift the focus to, you know, the,↗

19:18Speaker 1the propaganda is coming from these countries, and that's the problem, not, not Israel, because nobody's talking about that. So what's interesting though, is that, y-you know, what it looks like is a list is being developed, and very recently I saw, Representative and Paulina Luna is, is, you know, highlighting this in her posts. Laura Loomer's highlighting it also,↗

19:46Speaker 1and, they're citing, you know, an entity that's, you know, from this office in, in the White House that were behind these reports with, Sebastian Gorka and, Vine and Fig Tree. That are saying that there is a list, they've seen a list of foreign actors, foreign influencers on the conservative right that are being paid by foreign, operatives, and that, you know, the fara-- now all of a sudden, Pauline and Luna is, you know, interested suddenly in pushing the White House to reopen the foreign, the fara, investigation and oversight office that Pam Bondi closed in twenty twenty-five, but not because of the Israeli problem. We have, but because of Russia, China, Pakistan, and Iran, right? And that these people, you know, people like Ian Carroll, Dan Blazerian, Ian Malcolm, you know, that these people, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, you know, Candace Owens, on and on and on, there's a whole list, that these people are all working for,↗

20:54Speaker 1you know, either Russia, China, Pakistan, or Iran to go against, Trump's policies and the government's policies. So they're spinning it as these people are, being used and paid to attack our, attack our government, and what needs to happen is the, Congress needs to enact legislation and the White House needs to enact, you know, policies that, identify, monitor, detect, and go after these people. That's literally- Really what it comes down to in every one of these reports, when you look at it over and over and over, that's what they ultimately conclude at the end of their reports in each case.↗

21:39Speaker 1and so the-- what we learned was, you know, when Mel and I wrote our article on this, and at that time we only had access to the screenshots, not the full report, but we were able to identify that, you know, who Vine and Fig Tree is, the fact that, you know, they are an entity that, you know, that, states that they-- their whole mission is to fight antisemitism and hate, they're set up With like, you know, they raised something like three million dollars in twenty twenty-four, which is the latest numbers that they have published, coming all from unknown, undisclosed philanthropic donors, so we don't know where the money's coming from. they're set up like in a,↗

22:27Speaker 1sort of in a network, so the, you know, the big entity, Vine and Fig Tree Institute, gets the bulk of the money, and then they start filtering it to their little subsidiaries. you know, through as a subsidiary fund, that's called the Vine and Fig Tree Fund, and then they start funneling a hundred thousand, two hundred thousand to all these different, you know, quote-unquote, anti-uh, antisemitism, you know, organizations that fight on, antisemitism. Again, I wanna emphasize that they all adhere to the IHRA definition, so, you know, they conflate any, you know, criticism of Israel, whether it's, you know, the war in, you know, in the Middle At least to the, you know, Israeli lobby's, influence in the US, it doesn't matter, like that gets conflated into that definition. So,↗

23:19Speaker 1so, you know, this entity that is based out of New York, which I confirmed with Gabrielle that, you know, the entity that, she mentioned in her post, that, that, you know, originally hired her, which is Fine and Fig Tree, that they did tell her that they were based out of New York, so we are fairly certain, almost positive that, you know, the- The, entity that we identified in our report is the same. and so what's interesting is that the main report that they developed is something that's called,↗

23:52Speaker 1the, let's see here, the foreign malign influence targeting the Trump administration's policies and personnel. So that's like the, like the main, document in this like huge cache. The author of this document is a guy named Zach Scapara. Zach Scapara was an executive at X, X's trust and safety through twenty twenty-five. Not some lowly worker in trust and safety, but an executive, right? So this guy had, you know Real power in, in, in X, and he worked through sometime in twenty twenty-five, at which point he, you know, stopped working there and started focusing on Vine and Fig Tree. He also has another, organization that he works for that also Fights, claims to fight antisemitism, anti-Zionism, and anti-Israel bias. So this is the guy who authored this report.↗

24:57Ian MalcolmAnd, and what, what was his tie to, you were saying to X prior to those roles?↗

25:04Speaker 1He was an executive at Access, trust, and safety. You know, the people that ban accounts.↗

25:11Ian MalcolmSo, so the very guy, let me get this straight. So the very guy whose sole job is to scan everything on this app to find individuals that are prospectively of concern to, let's call it, certain interests, leaves X and then goes to an organization whose sole goal is to scan information on behalf of, let's say, those same interests to present it into political reports so they can then persuade All the way up to the White House to make legislative decisions that would negatively, prospectively infringe on the rights and liberties of those very users. Is, is that right?↗

25:46Speaker 1Abs- Absolutely, absolutely. It is that, it is that absolutely, you know? Correct.↗

25:56Ian MalcolmYes. I, I, and here's the, that is, that is un- because we said, you know, we discussed some of the entanglements here, but what you're suggesting is that literally the, the people that have all the access to basically all the data are then leaving that network where they can prospectively use all the data that they might have, let's say, dishonestly or, or unrighteously copied and pasted for their own benefits to then sell it to the government. This is crazy.↗

26:20Speaker 1Yeah, and there appears to be overlap between the time he was at Trust, Trust and Safety and when he actually developed this report, because↗

26:38Speaker 1Oh, I'm sorry. Did I lose you guys?↗

26:40Ian MalcolmYou, you did for a second.↗

26:41Speaker 1Oh, sorry. Somebody, somebody cut me off. I thought↗

26:43Ian Malcolmthe trust and safety guys came in and↗

26:45Speaker 1cut me off. Cut me off, right? So this report that he authored is dated for April 2025. I know that in his interview with Emily Austin, yes, the Israel Pay, you know, self-admitted Israel paid influencer Emily Austin, that he interviewed, he had an interview with her, I think it was either in November of twenty twenty-five. At that time, in her interview, she mentions, "Before you leave X, can you do something, something for me?" So he was working through, at least based on that interview, through some time through November, December of twenty twenty-five. This report was written in April twenty twenty-five. So there appears to be overlap Between when he was still in trust and safety and when he was developing this report for Vine and Fig Tree, which ended up in the White House, with Sebastian Gorka↗

27:42Ian MalcolmHow, how is it, out of curiosity, as, given that his role, talk about, trust and safety, isn't this kind of ironic, right? Given one of the roles of Elon's employees at X is to safeguard the, let's say, the privacy and, and the, personalities that are using this application, how can the very person who's in charge of that then turn around and go to basically sell insights on those users to this- Israeli operation. I don't, I don't understand how that can't be a massive either crime or at least a, a, a, you know, a non-ethical maneuver.↗

28:21Speaker 1Exactly, precisely, which is why I think that, you know, this piece of it has been largely overlooked in Gabrielle's, you know, expose. Like she, she definitely pointed to it and she definitely made, you know, the, the, you know, highlighted and put the screenshots, but I think a lot of people- Missed that this guy, you know, was a huge, huge, you know, player in trust and safety and was developing this report at the same time. So how is that not a breach of, you know, his confidentiality agreement, you know, breach of, you know, user, data privacy? I mean, I don't know. I mean, there's a lot here that's very alarming. And here's the piece that makes it even more alarming. This guy Scapara↗

29:14Speaker 1was previously, a commander in the Israel IDF. So he's not some Joe Schmo Zionist, you know, American sitting here. He was an active participant in the Israel IDF, which likely also indicates that he's a dual Israeli dual citizen and has, you know, clear motivations coming from a foreign country to, you know, manipulate and- And, and work on behalf of, I mean, it's certainly from everything that, you know, his work history, the Israel IDF, the fact that he works for the↗

29:52Speaker 1the Jacques Coalition for Justice, which is the, you know, that, that organization he created that's, you know, combating antisemitism, anti-Zionism, and anti-Israel bias. He writes for the Israel, The Times of Israel. you know, this guy is, is very, very active in this space. He wrote, "When, X rolled out the geolocation feature," He was all over it. He wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post, talking about how this is the greatest thing ever. And mind you, they rolled out the geolocation right around the time that he was leaving, so he was there fully until they rolled that sucker out, right? And wrote an op-ed talking about how now that we know there's geolocations, that the US government can now, create digital borders to segregate, you know, conversa- Conversations so that, you know, conversations that, you know, and opinions and viewpoints that are from different countries no longer infiltrate into the American conversation So putting us literally in a bubble. When I see, when I see all of these reports, you know, like in the last like four years that I've just been digging and digging and reading, whether it's, you know, pro-Israel entities on the right, on the left, it doesn't matter. The alarm that they have is the fact that when it comes to online, you know, discussion, they can't control it. They-- there isn't no borders. It's not like pre-social media, pre-internet, where, you know, they could filter Or everything through the mainstream media, and only a certain narrative would get, you know, to the American public. And that's why for decades and decades and decades, everyone saw only one side of the conversation, right? Only, you know, one narrative. And now they can't do that. So there is this constant effort to try to figure out, how do we do this? How do we segregate, you know, Americans? If you guys, were pay-- you know, were paying attention to, you know, things that were happening to- The left, because it is literally what's happening to the right today is identical to what was happening to the left in twenty twenty-four. They crushed the left in a large way, way like the, the, the left, you know, protests, the, the, you know, the protests that were happening on school campuses, on, you know, cities and blah, blah. They crushed that for the most part. And so now the problem they have on the right is, the right isn't on the streets protesting, they're online. And so what's happening is they're doing, they're trying to use the same tactics. If you guys remember when, you know, they were going after the left, they came out with this report called, Project Esther. And in Project Esther, they said that there is a growing terrorism happening in the US, and this terrorism resides in the left, in the pro-Palestine movement. And the reason this is alarming is that they're increasingly pro-Palestine and pro-Hamas. By default, they're pro-Hamas, and because Hamas is, is a terrorist, entity, according to our government, these people are pro-terrorist And therefore, they're part of what is called the Hamas support network, and they literally say essentially they are terrorists. They literally say this in their report. What I'm seeing here in the VFT report is walking that same line with the right, except they're using the term foreign malign influencers. And they're linking it to acts of terror, to people who are want the worst for our government, who are basically, what I see happening is they're trying to paint people as operatives of a foreign government trying to harm our government. Well, what happens there is then you, by default, end up becoming, you know, falling under the definition of terrorist. So you're seeing this walk happening very similar to what was happening to the left, they're trying to walk it, the right in that way. So, and, and you'll see, I'm that convinced of it 'cause I've, I saw it happen before, and I'm seeing the same, they're using the same tactics, to go after the right. So Anyhow, so this guy is behind a lot of these reports, but there's other people as well. There's a whole-- I mean, you have, you guys will have to look through all of the documents to see. but, you know, they're essentially saying, "Hey, we gotta go after these people, we gotta put up digital porters, we gotta identify who these people are, we gotta, you know, go after who these influences are, we have to either label them, go after them, find where, where their money is coming from, find out if they're doing Things to harm our government, you know, and, those who are breaking the law, arrest them. Yada, yada, yada, yada. That's the, the line that they're going down. And then they link it, okay? So here's where it gets a little bit, you know, as I was researching Where it gets like really,↗

35:10Speaker 1alarming, right? In this whole walk towards terrorism. So one of the things that Gabrielle had mentioned in her initial data, or initial, viral post was that, you know, people need to look at the sixteen-page counterterrorism strategy that the White House, recently published at, under Sebastian Gorka. So I was like, "Oh, that's interesting, " 'cause I've seen the counterterrorism strategies before, and I was looking at it, way back in twenty twenty-two Two, when the Biden administration was going after, you know,↗

35:44Speaker 1predominantly, you know, the right, you know, whether it was people who were questioning the COVID virus, whether they were MAGA, and they were questioning the, the election, things like that, like that. And I remember that was the first time, you know, that I saw that they were making an attempt to define domestic terrorism, and they were, and I was, you know- At that time, I was trying to find out what law are they trying to use to go after people under this definition, like what gives them the, you know, legislative authority to then, you know, de-define people as domestic terrorists. it became a real hodgepodge of definitions, and under the Biden administration, they actually tasked the Department of Justice to come up with recommendations for new legislation in the absence- Of legislation where they could go after people as domestic terrorists, but they didn't quite make it, right? They didn't quite make it. Administration changed, and so now the Trump administration has their own,↗

36:52Speaker 1you know, definition and has their own strategy that they recently published. Here's what's interesting, and I'm gonna read you guys a little portion of my, of my article because it'll help you understand. We did a comparative analysis between the VFT doc- documents and the sixteen page, national, you know, the counterterrorism strategy, right? To see are there overlaps, how much of, you know, these documents from VFT and entities like them are influencing,↗

37:26Speaker 1you know, the national strategy, right, on counterterrorism. And I'll, you know, I'll, I'll just read this real quick 'cause it'll help you guys understand. So, and then you guys can also, if you want, look in my, a- Our, article, I have, we have a table that shows the comparison. so okay, the recently published White House counterterrorism strategy is relatively restrained on domestic issues and focuses on foreign, cartel threats, which align with core America First pri-priorities. However, the VFD documents reveal a shadow effort to expand the definition of foreign malign influence to include legitimate conservative skepticism Of Israeli influence, foreign aid, and endless Middle East entanglements. Zack Scaparra and VFT are attempting to insert pro-Israel narrative policing into the broader counter foreign influence umbrella that the White House strategy endorses, while the strategy warns against politicized domestic surveillance. VFT's leaked materials show using national security language to monitor and counter America First. Voices who challenge pro-Israel policies. This creates a classic public restraint versus private expansion dynamic common in influence operations. VFT's efforts mirror Project Esther, Esther, which outlined a similar agenda to define foreign malign influence to include legitimate criticism within the American left of Israeli influence, foreign aid to Israel, and the Gaza genocide. Project Esther was also, was produced by the Heritage Foundation But it relied heavily on data from Israel and pro-Israel NGOs such as NCRI, ICAP, ADL, and Canaan Mission. Similar to VFT, it claimed the virulently anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, and anti-American groups comprising the so-called pro-Palestine movement inside the United States are exclusively pro-Palestine and more so pro-Hamas. They are part of a highly organized global Hamas support network and therefore effectively a terrorist support network. Network, end quote. So↗

39:41Speaker 1the, there is, you know, injection, and it's very similar again to, you know, I brought up the previous Biden administration's attempts at defining what a domestic terrorist is. there is a similar effort, it appears here, between the national strategy and what these VFT files, you know, show, that while they specifically in the national strategy say we are not We're not focusing on domestic terrorists, or we're not focusing on domestic, you know, Americans. We're not gonna persecute Americans the way the Biden administration did, 'cause they were bad, and we're not bad, we're good. What they do do is they talk about foreign malign actors, and VFT is now saying foreign malign actors are people who criticize the Israeli government's influence in the US.↗

40:33Speaker 1So now you've brought in that definition, and so now you, as an American who is questioning this, can now be defined as a foreign malign actor, which is what these reports are doing. They're identifying the list of names, as foreign malign actors, whether-- and then they kind of throw in, you know, countries, you know, here and there, but again, with no evidence in the documents of how did you- develop this, you know, conclusion. Where's your evidence? How, you know, like, where are you getting this from? You just show screenshots that so-and-so person is this. In the case of Ian Malcolm, you know, it, they literally argue that Ian Malcolm is a Iranian-backed, operative because Ian Malcolm's Persona Online is Ian Malcolm. There is an account that was created, that's inactive today, on Facebook that also has the Persona Ian Malcolm. It was created in twenty twelve. And previous to being called Ian Malcolm, it was called Hamid Terzio, I think that was the name. And therefore, they're the same people. With zero evidence provided as to, hold on, you're basically just saying two accounts on two separate social media, sites that happen to share the same, you know, name are the same person just because they happen to share the same name. That's it, that's literally your evidence.↗

42:15Ian MalcolmThe, the, the profile pictures also both have sunglasses.↗

42:18Speaker 1Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly. I mean, that's literally- Yeah, I mean, he put the screen, he shared the screenshot I shared with him. That's it, that's all they have in the report. And there is no backup data, there is no citations or footnotes of like, you know, go look at this for, you know, how we came up with this or whatever. None of it, none. It doesn't exist. And so this is the type of, you know, reports they come up with, and this is what I'm talking about when I say that these reports are bogus, because if you look at it, you're like↗

42:53Speaker 1and so this is what they're doing, but, you know, what's alarming is they're co- using that to conclude that, you know, this is happening and that we need to now go after these people. So, you know, so that's basically the gist of, you know, what we've discovered so far. I'm still going through all of the documents. There's tons and tons, by the way, of survey data that they have,↗

43:18Speaker 1you know, looking at specific segments of the US population. This morning, I posted one screenshot where they're specifically focused on, evangelical Christians fifty-five and older, and the survey, is- Is literally looking at what motivates them, who they listen to, who influences them, and what you find, of course, in that segment of the population, because they're Christian evangelicals, that, you know, a huge motivator for their support in Israel is what, you know, one of the questions, is, is the Bible. sixty-something percent of them or something like that, it was a majority,↗

44:03Speaker 1cited that They, they, follow dispensationalism, and that, you know, supporting Israel is a biblical motivator. and so what, what you see in all of these surveys is they're looking at who their target audience is, who to develop specific, you know, narratives to, and how to get it to them. And so there's a lot. I mean, the survey data is, I think probably, something like twenty, twenty different, surveys that are in there that specifically, you know, ask repeatedly questions about Israel, you know, what the motives are, you know, how-- They're, they're literally identifying how to manipulate people.↗

44:51Ian MalcolmSo I'm, I'm curious, for your thoughts on this one, because when I-- when you sent me the screenshot, I really did laugh. I was like, "Wait a second, they, they have the same name and they both have sunglasses. This, this can't be-- these people can't be this clueless." And so I'm curious, do you think this is just incompetent? Because I have trouble believing that's what this is. Especially given the fact that the person that helped to author this came from the trust and safety division at X, meaning they've gotta be somewhat competent with data and therefore able to try and connect some of these dots via, I, I would presume that they would use IP addresses or any number of other sources of data to try and, and build this out, right? Instead, they, they go on this just laughable leap, which leads me to conclude, again, they're either completely incompetent in an app Or more likely, at least in my opinion, just looking at this, that this is intentionally done with this degree of ignorance so that they can put it forward, pushing a, a narrative that they know is disingenuous and dishonest for the ability for them to suggest that something is happening that's not, if that makes sense.↗

46:03Speaker 2Is that-↗

46:06Ian MalcolmOh, you, you cut out again.↗

46:08Speaker 1Sorry. Yeah, sorry you got another call, I ended it. it's the latter. I, I believe it's definitely the latter. I don't think that these people who author this stuff are incompetent or, you know, anyway, you know, not smart people. I think they're actually very smart people. The problem is that, you know, as I mentioned earlier, I- Our, our government, our elected officials are literally the incompetent, you know, idiots, buffoons, whatever you wanna call them. They don't read these reports. They take talking points from these people. They do briefings with these people where these people just brief, you know, with the conviction that this is all fact, and they will brief them, but no one is looking through these reports because if they do↗

47:00Speaker 1Then some person would, you know, quite, just few brain cells would be able to, you know, identify that there is no evidence, there is no, you know, evidence to back up any of the claims that they're making. Your example is one of the best ones. I mean, there is no evidence to, you know, how did you make this con-connection? Do you, like you said, you have IP data? Do you... What, what made you leap to this conclusion? Because it's in none of your reports. And you see this in all of these NCRI reports, the ICE GAP reports. I've looked at ADL reports extensively, and I can tell you that, you know, those reports, and I've published it as well, that, you know, they will claim that, you know, anti-Semitism is, you know, exploding in America, and they have these like bar charts, right? Like that show, like, come twenty twenty-three, like everyone lost their minds, and, you know, like,↗

47:59Speaker 1basically like all Jews are Like, you know, at risk of like getting harmed and blah, blah, blah. 'Cause they'll, you know, they'll push it, but when you peel the data and you look at, and they segmented themselves, right? So you can go on their website and look at it yourself, that, you know, at least for the twenty twenty-five report that I looked at,↗

48:18Speaker 1the data showed that, you know, it was I'm sorry, not 2025. I think the one that I did was 2024. The 2024 data, 66%. And this is their own data tell-telling you this. 66% of the entire bar graph that showed there was nine thousand something cases were incidents of anti-Israel Language, anti-Israel, you know, whether it was criticism, they called harassment, whether it was protests, you know, encampments, whatever you wanna call them, there was a whole list that they identified, and it was all-- and sixty-six, that's two thirds of your report is anti-Israel language, and you're calling it antisemitism. So, but the problem is again, that, you know, you hear our lawmakers, you know, any given day you go and search And, go on their, you know, X-pages, and they'll all cite the ADL report, but none of them will say, "Oh, by the way, sixty-six percent is anti-Israel and only one third is anti-Semitism per the ADL's own report." They won't talk about it. They'll just talk about how there's an anti-Semitic explosion because nobody's looking at the data. And the same thing happens here. So what I think is happening is that, you know, these people who develop these reports know that And so they take advantage of that, knowing that no one's actually looking at these reports. And so therefore, no one's there to call them out, you know, at least not in the, you know, in the, in the power circles.↗

49:58Ian MalcolmNo, and, and that's, that's exactly the impression that I got, right? And this whole thing of, "Through deception we shall wage war," it feels like that's exactly this, right? They, they are looking at the battlefield, and to your point around antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiments, right? They're now conflating those things to lie to the politicians, and I can totally see them lying about all the activity on X. Oh, there's, there's foreign influence. We need to quickly lock down everything on social media, just like they did with TikTok. Right? They got rid of the foreign interference by selling it to Larry Ellison, who then resulted in Netanyahu saying, "Yay, we got TikTok." And it's, it's, it's all such a, such a joke, it's such a ruse, it's so disingenuous with just the rampant dishonesty. And all it does, of course, is just further the very thing that they claim they're trying to get rid of, which makes me wonder again, is it just incompetence, and they don't recognize what they're doing, i-is obviously going to beget the The very thing that they cry about, or if it of course is just disingenuous with the explicit purpose of creating the problem so they can offer the solution that they already anticipated, right? And, and that's what it certainly feels like here is yet another example of it.↗

51:12Speaker 1I, I'm confident it's the latter because the, it's, that's exactly what they did to the left. They literally, you know, equated the protests that were happening, they were anti-Israel protests. They convinced, you know- Majority of the, of the, you know, population for a minute, I think people are starting to realize it's different now. Certainly they convinced the right that these were, you know, communists who were brainwashed by Islamists, who were here to, you know, who were,↗

51:46Speaker 1you know, literally like being anti-Semitic and attacking Jews and doing none of that. None of that, I mean, if you look at, I, I, you know, there's, one of the, I think it was the eighth anti-Semitism hearing on the, the, the House. I think they've, they've done either nine or ten or something now, but I watched the eighth one in detail. There is, one,↗

52:11Speaker 1House Rep From Virginia, his name is Bobby, I forget his last name. But anyway, it was the first time I actually heard somebody talk about the actual data. So, you know, there is, you can report, like, if you're a student on campus, you can report, you know, hate crimes, right? So if there's like a hate crime that's being done against you, you can report it. It gets reported to,↗

52:36Speaker 1the Department of Education's, Civil Rights Office, right? because it's under Title Seven of Civil Rights Act that, you know, if you get-- if you're a university and you get federal funding, you have to abide by civil rights laws, and they have an office where people can, you know, report violations. Well, he cites this data, and what he was arguing is this is the eighth anti-Semitism, you know, hearing we have, yet there's twelve thousand, you know,↗

53:05Speaker 1cases that are reported to the Civil Rights Office. Only one hundred and forty-four of those cases is antisemitism, Ian. Twelve thousand cases, one hundred and forty-four. And this hearing was done at the beginning of, I think it was like first quarter of twenty twenty-five. So he was citing from twenty twenty-three, twenty twenty-four into twenty twenty-five, one hundred and forty-four. Okay? That's one percent. Of the reports that were actually filed, and then if you compare it to how many students were actually registered in universities, which is nineteen million, it was zero, literally point zero zero zero zero zero five zeros seven percent of the population, right, is those one hundred and forty-four reports. So where is this rampant antisemitism that we heard about for years and continue to hear about, and ADL posts about? Why doesn't it translate to people? People filing cases with the Civil Rights Office, right? The Trump administration sued and, and threatened to withhold, you know, federal funding from these universities until they adopted their, you know, what I call the ZEi policies of, you know, antisemitism, fighting, combating antisemitism. So they all have adopted it. They all adopted the IHRA, and, you know, virtually no one is allowed to have protests on, on campuses anymore related to Israel.↗

54:35Speaker 1And they did all of this, but yet when you look at the civil rights cases, a hundred and forty-four, that's what we did this for. So when you look at the, like, again, you actually look at the data, which is really hard to find, but this guy actually published it, and I reached out to his office and got him to post it online, and I was able to finally then publish it, you know, and say, "Hey, look, this is fucking ridiculous. What the hell are we even talking about?" But you don't-- it's not on the news About it, so, you know, the whole world continues to just assume that, you know,↗

55:11Speaker 1the nine thousand cases that ADL, you know, reports is what's actually happening versus the hundred and forty-four that's in the Civil Rights Office, or if you look at the FBI report, a much, much smaller case, you know, of actual FBI, law, well, law enforc-enforcement, reports, right? Of actual, like, crimes, that were- Reported, that the FBI actually, gathers, right? And so,↗

55:40Speaker 1those reports, when you compare it to that, it's in the low thousands, I think that, you know, for last year it was something like, you know, some, something like fifteen hundred or something like that across the whole US was, quote unquote, anti-s, you know, anti-Jewish, hate crimes. and so, you know, and by far way less than like anti-black crimes, for example. I don't know how they quantify this stuff, but the number I think was like, you know, crimes that were, against black people was something like in the four or five thousands in one year versus like the anti-Jewish crimes, which was like something like, you know, it was like twelve hundred or something like that. So they're huge disparaging numbers, right? But again, none of them come even close to what the ADL reports, which, you know, majority of which is not actual crime, it's- You know, it's stuff that the ADL just gathers and reports.↗

56:40Ian MalcolmNo, it's, it's wild to hear that, and, and it, it brings me actually to a question. and I, I, I just wanted to, congratulate and thank, Gabriella, who I, I think is down in the listener panel, certainly welcome to come up and, and speak if, if of interest. but I'm, I'm kind of curious, Gen X girl, just the, the way in which some of this data was garnered in the first place↗

57:04Ian MalcolmThat you were synthesizing, where did some of this originate when it comes to the fig and vine, or fig and vine tree? How did, how did that initially leak or, or get in her hands? And I'm just kinda curious about that whole process.↗

57:17Speaker 1I think Gabrielle, Gabrielle would be the best person to talk about this. I can only say based on what I read in her post, which was that, you know, she, she writes for a living and, she was, you know, she was approached to help write, you know, Essentially what I, w-my words, but, you know, pro, narrative and propaganda campaign for this effort. And instead she, she read it and, I'm assuming she was, you know, concerned about it and made the decision, you know, that I'm very certainly grateful for, the, of exposing this rather than, going along with it. But I, I don't wanna speak for her 'cause I don't know, and she, she can certainly explain that.↗

58:06Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely, and it, it is, I, I mean, if you think about it, no differently than some of the other individuals that have stepped forward, and we can certainly look at Snowden and some of these others that have kind of come out as whistleblowers, and, and this is, you know, it's, it's of monumental significance that people are willing to do stuff like this and put their necks out and say, "I came across this, it's very concerning," and this is just another example where we see the unfortunately exact same pattern in terms of who's In this case, how dishonestly they're willing to manipulate data to try and further their ambitions. And, and it's, it's just, again, it's staggering because obviously it's going to beget the exact same sentiments that they claim they're trying to, you know, essentially distill or, or to eliminate. And it's like, well, guys, you know, maybe if you stopped, to, to go back to a little pop culture reference, like Princess Leia said, right? Stop squeezing your fist so tightly because the, the star systems, the idea of control, it's It seems like this group of people is incapable of doing anything but continuing to squeeze at every, every little ounce of sand that they can find in their hands, and as they do, we all just kind of slip through it because we, you know, we see more clearly our side of the story, and then as a result, more people kind of come flocking to it.↗

59:23Speaker 1Yeah, and I, and I think that ultimately the goal for this isn't necessarily that they're going to win. I mean, I, we've certainly, for those of us tracking, what happened with students, and I, I, I've been tracking what happened with, I mean, you know, so I was, somebody who was genuinely concerned for them because it was, I mean, the amount of lies that were, you know, that were,↗

59:47Speaker 1thrown at these students, ultimately, and then, you know, for the students that were here were on student visas, the fact that they were rounded up for being critical of Israel, and, you know, in, and then in other cases, rounded up, there was a case in Michigan where, you know, there were American students who were rounded up by, a very, very Zionist, pro-Israel, attorney general. It was a huge scandal where she worked with the Board of Regents of Michigan University. A University of Michigan, where they literally targeted these students who were just protesting. They weren't breaking the law, they weren't committing any crimes, they were targeted. And what they were trying to do is send a message to scare these students into stop protesting. They didn't have a case because they didn't do anything, but what they did do is they had the FBI like break down their doors, raid their house, scare the shit out of them, you know, five o'clock in the morning, arrest them the case literally got thrown out, and it was, it was crazy because what they found out, and it was actually due to a guardian report, where they exposed that this attorney general in Michigan was in complete cahoots with the board of regents. Out of the eight board of regents Six of them donated to her campaign. She hired one of their law firms to do work for her. I mean, these people were like in bed with each other. I looked at their Instagram, they were going to breakfast, they were in chat groups together. I mean, they were openly talking about this stuff. And so all of this got exposed, and so they started an investigation, you know, on that. And what was, what was revealed was it was in fact a huge collusion to go after these students. So the judge was, the morning of, where the judge was going to,↗

1:01:50Speaker 1remove the attorney general from the, from the case because of, you know, this collusion that she was involved in, and there was going to be a separate case brought against her, that she ended up dropping the case that morning. Leading up to that morning, it was all about, "These are terrorists, they're terrorists, they're terrorists," and then all of a sudden- All of a sudden she drops the case against nine students, like it was incredible, and the reason they did that is because they couldn't afford to go, you know, have the, a separate case against her and then go into discovery, because then they would really, you know, what was really happening would have been, uncovered. So the case just gets dropped. But my point is, is that you see this, whether it's lawsuits or, you know, criminal cases, they lose majority of them because they don't have cases against- These people, what they try to do is, you know, scare people into not, you know,↗

1:02:50Speaker 1not talking about this stuff, not writing, not protesting, not, you know, opposing this stuff, because, you know, as a regular person, you're not gonna have the money to fight a lawsuit in a court case, you know, the way these people have. I mean, just Jonathan Greenblatt a few months ago was bragging about how they have fifty thousand, you know- You know, attorneys on retainer, ready to go after people and sue them. You know, so it's a machine, and I think that they use a lot of these tactics to scare people into silence.↗

1:03:25Ian MalcolmNo, absolutely. And, I've, I've got a couple other questions, but I know Gen X, because you, you have somewhat of a, a, a time restraint, so as a result, I wanna go to some of the other hands, make sure people get a chance to ask questions. If you have one, feel free to, to request a mic or put into the And then Joanne, you can either pick Tom or Best of the Gentiles, 'cause I don't know what the order might be there.↗

1:03:48@joann_marieAnd hey, Jan, and Jan next girl, thank you so much for hosting. This is- It's absolutely wild. I, I saw when, when it was published the first time, when, and also right now when Ian sent it to me, and it's absolutely crazy. Imagine all this, all the Jurassic Park fans in, in the world like being, being stalked by the White House, being like, "Is this the Ian Malcolm? Like, that, this is literally insanity." But I'm, I'm so glad that you guys are doing this space, and I got here late, but I will, I will listen to the Recording. And everyone, thank you so much for being here. And guys, please repost this page, follow Ian and Genex Girl and our amazing, amazing speakers, and thank you so much for being here.↗

1:04:35@joann_marieTom, welcome, go for it.↗

1:04:38Speaker 3Yeah, thanks, Joanne. Thanks, Ian. thanks, Genex, for the presentation. So let me ask you a question. Do you think that, that most of these efforts to find ways to essentially end run our guaranteed rights as US citizens? Or even, you know, in the minds of, of, of those seeking to find disingenuous means through which to essentially rid us of our most critical rights now, especially post-COVID, more today than ever.↗

1:05:01Speaker 3Do you think that, that they're truly meant to stick? Or, I mean, because they sound so silly, that I can't help but ask if you, if you sense that, you know, the excuse-- I, I mean, excuse the expression, but It feels like they're kind of just throwing these ridiculous ideas at the wall in hopes that something sticks, because the justifications for disingenuously labeling people who they wanna target for their speeches, things they aren't, are so absurdly unscientific and unserious that they really do seem, to me at least, like throwaway tactics, you know, that are kind of meant to suffocate the free flow of information, that are meant to intimidate people and chill speech.↗

1:05:42Speaker 3but, you know, there's- They're doing, they're going about this in a way that's so hysterical, you know, in their efforts to limit people's speech, that basically, I'll simplify the question, and I could just ask it this way, which of these changes to the way that online speech is, is, is, is possible, because they're trying to intimidate us away from it, which of these changes do you actually think could lead to, let's say, actual action that would lead to situations that would become an inconvenience to someone like Ian Malcolm who's here sharing information with people, I'm certain the guy has↗

1:06:13Speaker 3Based on contact that I've had with them since I've been speaking in spaces, and a lot of us do this out of a sense of not only being concerned about society, but being concerned about the future of the country that we're from and that we depend on. So I find it really disingenuous in an administration that essentially ended up in office Because people had an understanding that all the nonsense, all the lawfare, all of the chilling of speech and cancel culture that the Biden, administration was associated with, we're gonna come to a stop. And so my, my question is, do you think any of these could actually stick and cause people like Ian, other concerned citizens, myself or many others, any inconveniences IRL, in real life, or is this just nonsense they're throwing at the wall hoping it sticks and nothing probably will?↗

1:06:55Speaker 1I think that, I think that, well, let me s-say this. So,↗

1:07:02Speaker 1do they wanna actually go after specific people and make examples of them, make them suffer? And then use that to scare people into silence, yeah. They definitely, 'cause they, they've done it, they've been doing it, right? I think up until recently, when it was done to the left, they, they specifically would target people who were Either Muslim Americans or, student visa holders. So the right, the American right, largely,↗

1:07:34Speaker 1conflated that with the immigration question, and it was easier to sell. It's going to be much more difficult for them to sell it when they're going after conservatives, Considering that it is a Trump administration, right? An administration that these same people that they're now targeting, elected them into office, so it is going to be a much more difficult conversation.↗

1:08:01Speaker 1but I think what they're doing is they've slightly changed the tactic, whereas before, you know, you can't-- these people that they're targeting now, they're Americans, so they're not gonna be able to just say, you know, "Oh, well, you know, there's this obscure law..." Law that gives the Secretary of State the power to deport people at whim, at, at his whim. I mean, literally that's, that's what they used to deport these student visa holders, right?↗

1:08:31Speaker 1and, you know, and then they moved it into-- I just saw recently that if you are, if you apply to be, to get a green card They just recently passed the thing, I think it was over the weekend or, or, you know, maybe Friday, where, if you're, if you're waiting for a green card, that they're going to deport you, and then wherever you are at, you have to wait for it there or whatever, right? So they've been using these tactics, and if you look at, you know, when the Trump administration first came into office, that spring, right after the inauguration in, you know, March and April, the first group of people they targeted weren't illegal, you know Immigrants, excuse me, you know, into the country, their target, their, their very first target were the student, the students, the student protesters, so who were here legally, and so they were the ones that were rounded up, they were the ones that were deported, and they went after them. And then they moved on now into the question of, you know, the green card holders, right? So again, these are all things that they can easily sell to the right because of the immigration question. They're not gonna be able to sell it as When they're now, you know, targeting a Tucker Carlson or a Candace Owens, which they won't, they won't go after the big fish like that because that'll cause an outrage, but they will go after the little guys, right? The smaller accounts, the smaller people, the people who don't have the means, don't have the money to fight, and they will make examples out of them to then, you know, use that as a scare tactic to get everyone else to shut up, right? And back down and be, you know, and be quiet because nobody's willing to, you know, or, you know, a lot of people don't have hundred thousand dollars laying around, you know, and for, unfortunately for people who are on the, you know What I call, whether it's dissident right or left, the money,↗

1:10:27Speaker 1apparatus that resides within the pro-Israel network doesn't reside in people, with people that question the government, question our relationship, you know, with, with, you know, Israel, the wars, the, you know, military-industrial complex. I mean, you're, you're, you know, you're basically going against, you know, a very well-financed machine, right? And so-↗

1:10:50Speaker 1I, I think that it's definitely used, used as a tactic to scare people into silence. But for anybody that actually has the means, or if you get, you know, an organization to help you fight it, I don't know if you guys have heard of Janine Yunus, she's on, she's on, X, she posts, she, you know, she fights a lot of cases, pro bono for people who are on the receiving end of, you know, the Israel lobby's, tactics And things like that, you know,↗

1:11:22Speaker 1and she's been very successful at doing it because their cases are so bogus and they, you know, they-- it's really hard. But I will tell you this I have, I know Janine, and I know the or-- these organizations, they are so not, you know what I mean? They, they're constantly struggling with funding, because the, the, you know, it's just not a well-oiled machine. I mean, who, who has fifty thousand, you know, lawyers across the US sitting on retainer to go sue anybody that criticizes Israel, right? I mean, we don't have that. So, so they do use it. But I will say one more thing on that issue is that, you know, will it be↗

1:12:02Speaker 1To achieve is what's going on in the UK, and as you guys have seen in the UK, you know, they go after people, they cr- they've criminalized speech in a lot of ways, right? And they do people, they put people in jail for speech. They would like to get us to that point. It's going to be much more difficult for them to do that because our laws are so different, you know, compared to the UK,↗

1:12:27Speaker 1and we do have, you know, laws in place that protect us, and, and protect our speech. However, to be protected, you need money to fight these cases. So I think the route they're going at is literally, you know, what they did on the left is, you know, find people, make them suffer, make it public, so everybody else can just-↗

1:12:49Speaker 3Interesting. Yeah, I think they're gonna fail. I think they're gonna fail miserably because the tradition of values that are instilled in people in the United States are just gonna crash against this. But thank you.↗

1:12:56@joann_marieYeah. That, that was such a great response, Gen X Girl. Thank you. Best of Gentles, welcome, go for it.↗

1:13:09Speaker 4Hey, Ian and Joanne, thanks for having me up. and thanks, Gen X Girl, for taking time out of your day. Everyone, please, retweet the space, so we can get more people listening, in here. That would be great. and, yes, I'm anti-Semitic. And now that we've established that, we can move on to the conversation. it seems like this is Operation Chaos in panic mode. Paid ops, non-paid ops, government assets, non-government assets. We all know the, the meme of, A spider-man, the five spider-mans, in a circle pointing at each other. no, you're, you're at him. No, you're him. No, you're, you're him.↗

1:13:49Speaker 4and so, that's all by design. they're using these government apps, or the government is using these apps and these platforms to, to basically sow, dissent and, and, and discord among, you know, the plebeians such as ourselves to- so that we can't focus on, on what the real problem is. And like Gen X is saying they can filter through like world geographies to like mold us in, into certain things, but I think that, I mean, as we can all see, they're doing it to segregate, segregate us by age, race, states, party affiliation, education level, and then, and they're then using what they call these AI data centers, you know, as like Oh, this is gonna make life so much better, but we're basically funding our own imprisonment with these AI dentists 'cause that's what they're using these for, i-is to compress and compile all this data and then spit out like what needs to be done to enslave us, control us. Fuck with our minds,↗

1:14:59Speaker 4and, you know, just like she said, she's, they're redefining these words to mean whatever they want them to mean. I was in maze in, in, in, Destiny's Space yesterday, and they, I think, Destiny pulled out like a seventy-year-old dictionary. And was just going through words such as, you know, t-what terrorism is, what ground zero, what the word ground zero actually means, and they're completely different. They, they did it with vaccines during COVID to redefine the definition of what a vaccine is. They're doing it in real time to people, and we're going, we're allowing them, and we're going along with it. Have they changed the definition of vaccine back? No. Every step they take one inch closer to putting us in prison. It's, it's a, they're slow walking it, and we're allowing it because we're the, we're the frog in the boiling water, that, that, that's basically allowing it.↗

1:15:58Speaker 4and like, if I could make an appeal to like everyone in this space and everyone that you con- come in contact with It's not right versus left, it's not Democrat versus Republican, it's not liberal versus, conservative. We can worry about those issues after the fact. It's we the people versus the government. And, just like, I-I think it was Tom that was before me that was saying, like,↗

1:16:28Speaker 4we're gonna win this, but we have to come together to win this. Like, it's gonna fail? But we have to come together as a people to do that. It's not gonna happen, by us, you know, sitting around, a-and, and getting angry about it. And just like Gen X says, "Who, for the..." They're gonna go after the, the me and the, the, the, the, the Ian Malcoms. They're gonna go after the people that don't have a hundred thousand dollars of cash lying around to, or even, I mean The average lawyer right now, it charges four hundred dollars an hour. That's not charging for their paralegals, that's not charging for an assistant attorney, that's not, that's not for anything. Like so if you think that you can afford six hundred to a thousand dollars an hour to defend you in, in court It's not happening. And they're gonna get you at the lower levels. They're not gonna get you at the, at the, the higher levels where it's gonna be seen in front of the, the Supreme Court. No, you're gonna get, you're gonna get nailed at the state level. You're gonna get nailed at the county level, and you're gonna get fucked unless we come together as, as a people.↗

1:17:40Speaker 4and With all that, I posted a couple of things a-about the data centers in the purple pill, and I also posted if anyone follows a gentleman named, named as the Fat Electrician on YouTube The Battle of Athens, Georgia, that took place after World War II, or not Athens, Georgia, Athens, Ten-Tennessee, that took place in the United States, the people against government tyranny. I highly recommend you people go watch it and see how the citizenry can come together, rise up, and overthrow a government. and I know Ian, you, you don't, advocate for any overthrowing of any government, but it is written in our constitution, it is a constitutional law, or not, or actually our Declaration of Independence is where it's written. It is in our founding principles of this country, we the people must come together. We have to fight these people. Stop making it a right, left Democrat It is. We must come together and fight these people.↗

1:18:47@joann_marieIntellectual war. I'll land it↗

1:18:49Speaker 4there. Yeah,↗

1:18:50Ian Malcolmthere's a lot, a lot of Fed posting there. Not sure if that's intentional or not, but, disavow all violence and calls for it. I do think that there is a spiritual and intellectual war, and they're looking certainly to physically suppress us, but certainly don't, don't celebrate any suggestions of violence. And for what it's worth, I think they would love it if they could suggest,↗

1:19:11Ian MalcolmIan Malcolm, the Guy whose name is actually Ahmed, he's the sixty-year-old Iranian guy, yeah, Mohammed, you evil Muslim, you, you don't have the right to firearms and he's advocating for violence, and I'm, I'm sure they would love that, right? Then they can just lock down not only our speech, but also our rights to firearms and all the other things they would love to disarm us with intellectually and, literally, for their purposes, right? So I think that's a, we certainly should- Yeah, they're,↗

1:19:38Speaker 4they're, they're allowed to, But, any, any talk of, of us forming and coming together, that, that, that is considered violence. i-i-it's rules, for thee, for, but not for me type shit.↗

1:19:56Ian Malcolmno, that's absolutely correct. and they will continue to push the, powder keg, in some cases, I suppose, literally and figuratively, but, our, our best path forward is exactly what we've been doing, right? And the very fact that we're having this conversation demonstrates the effectiveness of that very course of action, right? The, the reason that the White House is very concerned about the things that I say are not, any weaponry I might have in a theoretical arsenal, but rather because I talk, In a way that I suppose might be somewhat compelling to an audience that is ever-growing about a subject they wish everybody was ignorant to. And, so obviously we're having a major impact on the zeitgeist. And I always find it very, very funny because I endlessly get posts every single day in response to what I'm saying that will claim, "You're not going to have any effect on anything." And it's like, "Well, here you are in my replies. Obviously I am. Thanks for demonstrating the effectiveness of my very efforts." but, Low IQ people will make low IQ claims. but that being said, let's go to Mandy and then check in with, Raed, and, and then we'll go down, to, Panna Giot, I hope I, pronounced that properly, before we wrap up the space, depending on, Gen X girls' availability.↗

1:21:13Speaker 5Hey! so I have a question for Gen X girl, and then I just wanted to note some things that I noticed, but first I wanted her take. So first, has anyone compared the Biden era censorship strategy to the Trump era? Has anybody done that overlap?↗

1:21:32Speaker 1I've looked at, I think the closest I've done is compare the, the counterterrorism, national strategy from the Biden era to, the current one. And, again, there's, Whereas, previously they were going hardcore into, trying to get the Department of Justice under the Biden administration to find a definition and, one, identify, they had to find domestic terrorism, but identify legislation that allows them to go after domestic terrorism, and then if none exists, to make recommendations. For Congress to enact, you know, legislation that would allow them to do that. They took a different strategy, and that didn't really go, you know, very far, right?↗

1:22:29Speaker 1but Under the current administration, what they're doing is they're using redefinition tactics, so not pursuing new legislation, I think that they've learned from, you know, from the Biden administration that that doesn't go over very well, as, was seen with the, you know, backlash and reaction from the American right on being labeled domestic terrorists. but they're redefining, they're pursuing a tactic of, you know, redefining- you know, whether you are somebody that is on the right or the left, as I've noticed that, you know, they're using, you know, as, these VFD documents, show that they are using, you know, language like "foreign malign actors" or "foreign malign influencers," as, you know, as a definition That they've defined, you know, in their documents to fit within the counterterrorism strategy.↗

1:23:28Speaker 1similarly, it was done on the left with the Hamas support network, right? So if you're pro-Palestine, you're by default pro-Hamas and therefore a terrorist. so there's, there's this redefinition tactic happening to get you to qualify under, you know, terrorism laws.↗

1:23:48Speaker 5Okay, yeah, I hadn't been focused on that particular part of it. I'm just, I have a, marketing agency, a content marketing agency, so what I basically am constantly looking at is the minds that are just hidden so that we, you know, we can't let a client say a particular word or we tell them not to say a particular word 'cause we know it's going to get suppressed. And what we noticed, I'll just tell you, this is the short. summary. But what we noticed under Biden is that,↗

1:24:21Speaker 5words like simply mentioning the word Ukraine, just mentioning it in any context, this particular context was just about currency, so not about any war, mentioning the word Ukraine, ment-mentioning the word Bill Clinton, ment-mentioning or showing even a campaign card that said Trump or Kamala or Biden, saying the words trans, saying obviously COVID or coronavirus or anything like that. Would severely suppress any kind of content, and we know what happened now 'cause we've seen like the Twitter files and things like that, so that is out in the open. What happened a couple months before the twenty twenty-four election is that they relaxed,↗

1:25:02Speaker 5all of those terms, and you were able to say almost all of those things without any issue, or with very way lower issue than before. So if there was suppression, it would be far less than before. That happened a few months, I wanna- Say maybe three months before the twenty twenty-four election. now we're seeing heavy suppression around words like Jew, Epstein, conspiracy. You can't say without some form of suppression on most, social media, vaccine, you still can't, COVID, still suppressed, and the word Israel. So I'm trying to figure out whether it's just because obviously Ukraine was, was mainly the focus during Biden, that's what people- We're talking about, and that was suppressed. Now the focus is mostly, mostly on Israel, and that is being suppressed. I'm trying to figure out if this, if there's something deeper than this is just the current thing that the current administration is obviously trying to suppress, or if there's something more going on, like is Israel, 'cause it kinda seems like it, but it's way more in control now than it was.↗

1:26:10Speaker 1I will tell you as somebody who's been writing about Israel way before October 7th, that Israel at that time during, under the Biden administration, was suppressed. Just, people just didn't notice it because it was primarily, you know, anti-war people who were talking about it, and those accounts were suppressed. I actually think that I have, when Elon Bought X, everyone was like, "Yay, finally," blah, blah, blah, and, and they were, you know, they were saying that, I think this was like in twenty twenty-two when I posted this, and I'll dig it up if I can find it, but, you know, saying, you know, "We're the most oppressed people," and I, and I remember writing, you know, "No, the most oppressed people are people who criticize Israel, and no one knows it," you know? and so,↗

1:27:03Speaker 1you know, that was About it, whereas before, so that has definitely been something that's been going on for a long time. It's just what changed was the quantity of people talking about it and then realizing, "Oh, this isn't, you know, this isn't, allowed." so you get severely suppressed.↗

1:27:26Speaker 5That's really fair. I think that That makes a lot of sense, because a lot of more people are talking about Israel now since it is, the Ukraine thing is fading away, but there was two months before the election of very letting up on those suppressed terms, and now, we are seeing At least, I mean, because you can talk about trans, you can talk about a bunch of things that you didn't, you weren't able to before, and now there are just, maybe it's heavier suppression, maybe it's just that everybody's talking about it, but those Israel-linked, Epstein-linked talking points or terms are just heavily suppressed, way more than it seems like before, however that could just be, like you said, because more people are talking about it.↗

1:28:13Speaker 1Yeah, I mean, and, and Epstein is definitely surprised if you ever look at, and I don't know if this is just a glitch, 'cause, you know, I'm convinced like X is like held together with, like, you know, band-aids and bubble gum 'cause it's just, you know, like, rickety. But, you know, I, I've noticed at least on my, you know, Epstein posts that I've posted, you know, last year, when I go back to look at them, it could have been a post↗

1:28:42Speaker 1But had a lot of views and likes. And I don't know if you guys have noticed this, but the views, the likes, the everything is just set zero, like nothing shows. I actually saw one yesterday and I was like, "Whoa, this is weird." I, I made that exact↗

1:28:57Ian Malcolmcomment, Jen, in the space yesterday, 'cause I, I went back to find an old post that Joanne and I had made. It had eighteen thousand views, but every engagement, the comments, the likes, the bookmarks, the re-posts, all of it was set at zero.↗

1:29:10Speaker 1Yeah, yeah, mine too. Just a couple days ago, I noticed it. And so, yeah, and, and I noticed it happens on certain topics. And that, the one that I happened to see was an Epstein one. So I agree with you, there's definitely-- I think somebody recently even posted, you know, there's these accounts that look at, you know, GitHub and pull the, the algorithm and the code and, you know, and there was a list. Do you remember Ian? There was a list of like no-no words, you know, the words that got you↗

1:29:40Speaker 5Well over 5,000. I have, I have lists, and then during the last few years, I tried compiling my own, and I, it got so depressing. It was like every word. I was like, okay, I'm not gonna keep track of this anymore 'cause this is terrible. It was so many words.↗

1:29:58Speaker 1Yeah. And we need to come up with our own redefinition of things, you↗

1:30:02Speaker 5know,↗

1:30:02Speaker 1code words.↗

1:30:05Speaker 5Yeah, exactly.↗

1:30:09Speaker 5Oh, by the way, I just wanted to mention that, Gen X Girl is trying to get to a hundred thousand followers, so anybody in this space who doesn't already follow her, please give Gen X Girl a follow. She is wonderful, and this has been probably the most informative space I've ever been on, but I'm done talking now. Thank you,↗

1:30:28Speaker 1appreciate that. I will say that, just, before we get to the next hand, that, you know, one of the accounts that you guys should push back on is Representative Ana Paulina Luna, who, you know, last year I uncovered the-- and I'm glad to see her talking about it, but, you know, sadly, she's doing it disingenuously, you know?↗

1:30:54Speaker 1I, I had found a memo that Pam Bondi signed on her first day in office, at the DOJ. The memo, disbanded the Foreign Influence Task Force, the, you know, the, the office that, monitored and went after far, fara violators, right? Foreign Agent Registration Act violators. and it's something that, you know, in, in, you know, circles, at least my circle and, and others, you know, people have talked- Talked about it every so often,↗

1:31:26Speaker 1and, and it's gotten some tra-attraction, but recently, she's been talking about it and she's been posting, you know, that the White House needs to, you know, you know, do away with that and, start the far office again, because, you know, foreign influence is running rampant on, you know, social media. What-- but what her target is and the people that she's, you know, she's- She's highlighting, mirrors the, you know, what Gabrielle exposed in these VFT files, right? So she's not talking about Israel, and she's not talking about, you know, that, but she's fo-focusing, you know, on these other countries, which, again, I'm not saying that it doesn't happen, it's just that, you know, the grand scheme of things, the, you know, the, the volume is not quite the way we've seen it with, with the Israel. So why are you ignoring the big, you know, eight hundred pound I've been pushing back on her post, saying, "Okay, that's great, but number one, you take Israel lobby money, and number two, you know, you're not talking about Israel, you're talking about these other countries. and so why are you ignoring that?" Well, I posted-- She has two accounts, and I think one of them is, her personal account, except for it doesn't have a blue checkmark, it has a gray. But when I posted that, she blocked me. So I've been pushing back on her, you know, government account, you know, and she posted again this morning saying, you know, the White House needs to stand up the foreign office. I'm like, all right, cool. But are you gonna, you know, return your Israel lobby money and, also talk about Israel or are you gonna block me again? So I would just encourage people that if you see that, because Laura Loomer's now, you know, pushing her posts, talking about, oh, it's the Qataris and the Iranians and the, All this shit, you know? And, and then when you look at the source, and I'll put it in the things so you guys can see it, the source, the person that they're actually quoting as the person that claimed they have a list of influencers who are getting paid by foreign actors, it literally comes from the White House. This guy that works for the White House or, or is an advisor to Trump. And by the way, he just announced that he's gonna be speaking at the Jerusalem Post alongside The CEO of Israel Bonds. Like, what the fuck? Okay.↗

1:33:55Speaker 1So I posted that as well, like, "Yeah, this is your fucking source. You people have no, you know, intention whatsoever to talk about the Israel influence. What you wanna talk about is this, like, you know, random fucking other shit." So, excuse my language.↗

1:34:12Ian MalcolmNo, the overlap of these interests are just so insane, and, and I, I still can't believe that the head of the trust and safety of X then immediately, while in that role, works as a consultant for another group that's putting together a thing to basically, let's say, expose isn't even the wrong word, but to misrepresent activities on the very platform they're supposed to be monitoring in a trustworthy fashion so that they can sell that to Israel so that they can push to restrict the Rights of the very users that he's supposed to be ensuring the security of. The whole thing is just such a, such a joke. But, Ryan, I'm, I'm curious for your thoughts on all this.↗

1:34:52Speaker 6Yeah, hello. I'm looking for Hamid, the Iranian. Where is Hamid, the Iranian?↗

1:34:59Speaker 6I've been looking all over Asia, Asia for, for Hamid. she's right. These people. Did you↗

1:35:07@joann_mariestill hear the dinosaur?↗

1:35:09Speaker 6These people, I knew these glasses were Iranian. Yeah, man, these people, it's, it's just, they're, they're really pathetic, they're really disgusting in, in their ways. And, and let me, let me start with this. it's good to see you, Ian. and Joanne. And, and I agree with you, Ryan. I don't know where you've been, but you need to stop. I'm not a big fan of this murky ceasefire, no ceasefire while they, they, they kill us. It's just, it's just pissing me off, and, and I'm just waiting for the body to start again, boom, boom, you know? So I'll be back. but let me,↗

1:35:50Speaker 6Wonderful work, you know, regardless of, of w-which side I stand on, whatever, just the quality of the work, the effort you put, put in, the c-courage it takes, and then, you're eloquent when you speak, I can listen for hours. So really beautiful work, and thank you so much. And I just heard today that you were, you, you were aw-awake to the Israeli, you know, how criminal Israel is before, you know, the last couple of years. And this is my question. So I know from, from my mother when, when she studied in, in the US in, in nineteen sixty-eight, sixty-nine, she was in UCLA, and when I was a kid, you know, growing up with the problem of Israel's criminality against us as Lebanese and Palestinians and the rest of us You used to tell me that, forget it, in, in the United States, to just, try to convince, an average American that Israel isn't, hasn't persecuted or prosecuted the 1967 war with moral standards unseen, in, in any army before. So what I'm trying to say is that, you know, they, they, by way of deception, they have lied to you, Americans, for so long that Israel is the good guy, Israel is the most moral army, you know, the, the Jews in Israel, you know, they can't, you know, they can't live in peace, they can't have safety because us, you know, the rest of the, the hordes of the, of the Levantine or Arabs or Muslims, we just wanna kill them, all that, and, And, and if, if I, we go back to a couple of congressmen that I've followed over the years, because I've been looking at American politics be- just wanting to, for the Americans to wake up, right? And I remember James Trappicanti was a, was a congressman who came out hard. I, I know, Cynthia McKinney was also a congresswoman. There's Pat Buchanan. There's a few people, right? And, and you, you, if you compare their days Where they got destroyed with, with not a beep, no one noticed, nothing, there was no traction, you couldn't say anything. And today,↗

1:38:12Speaker 6the difference, the awakening to this problem, the awakening that Washington is occupied, and do you see any, you know, if you look at it as a, as a graph, as a trend, is it, optimistic in your view? And I will just wanna add one more thing. We've been dealing with these people, the Zionist Talmudic Jews in Israel, for a long time. And I can tell you one thing about them is that, yeah, maybe you can say they're smart, debatable how smart they are, right? or into how, how, how high IQ and all that. But what I can tell you about them is that there is no wisdom, like zilch wisdom. So the definition Of wisdom loosely, it's like you gather information from your past experiences and then you navigate better in the future, right? They, they don't have that. It's zero. And, and, and the fact that they went all out for Massey, one vote, one congressman, nationally known, and threw in thirty million, around thirty million dollars to take him out. Any wiser guy amongst them would have said, "You know what? Let him be. Let's not bring attention." That we're running shit. Let's not bring attention to APAC, let's not bring attention to the outside, outsized influence we have. They're not, and they, they-- and, you know, that Sun Tzu says, you know, don't interrupt your enemy when they're making mistakes. And I think the last two or three years, they're, they're all over the place. They're, they're, they're really all over the place. And I, and, and I'll let you answer of, on, on the optimism, but, but I'll just say one↗

1:39:59Speaker 6Deception, but then when you notice, it's fear tactics. And if you don't get scared, they lose, they lose. The Palestinians knew this a long time ago They refuse to get scared. Us Lebanese is the same thing. You won't scare us. It's our freedom, and we're gonna fight for it. We're not scared. And once you're not scared, that's it. So I think the way I see it, with this, there's almost a critical mass that's starting to gather. And the Americans are getting fed up and pissed off, like we, freedom, freedom is supposed to support, like the lands of, of the free and brave. So I think once, you know, people don't get scared Scared from the, these people's tactics, and they call them out. the worst thing for these people is to come into the light. They, they like, they love working in the shadows. When they see that there's, there's a spotlight on them, it's like, you know, the vampire when the sun comes up, and, you know, or they see the, the cross, they shrivel and they shout, "Shut it down, shut it down, right?" So, yeah. So just going back, let's, let's say,↗

1:41:12Speaker 6' Today, how do you see things evolving?↗

1:41:17Speaker 1Thanks. I mean, I will tell you that, you know, I've known about the Israel-Palestine issue since, I would say mid-nineties. I'm aging myself, and when I was in college, and, that's how I first learned about it. you know, I had some good friends who were very knowledgeable, and, I started to learn. It's interesting because post-9/11, things took, you know, a huge, drastic, change towards more pro-Israel, more, you know, more support, more aid, more funding, more programs.↗

1:42:00Speaker 1in fact, as, you know, as I've researched in the last four years After 9/11, so many, you know, new laws and new funding bills were passed to support efforts that supported Israel, that had nothing to do with 9/11, like absolutely nothing. And they conflated it because, you know, if you're old enough to remember 9/11, like I was I was an adult, a young adult, you know, just starting out my career, but, you know, it was, a night and day change, from September 10th to, you know, September 12th. September 11th, people were in shock, and then, you know, 12th and 13th, as people, you know, started to get back into normal life, things weren't the same. It was a very different world.↗

1:42:51Speaker 1and You know, there was a, it was very much, you know, there was fear, there was, you know, there was an enemy identified, and what the Israel lobby was very successful in doing is conflating the Palestine issue with 9/11 and, and getting, you know, tremendous, tremendous, you know, funding and support you know, for their programs, for, you know, but then also,↗

1:43:17Speaker 1infiltration into US government in that way, in particular, you know, through Department of Defense, through our intel agencies, under the guise of shared, you know, a shared common enemy, a shared, you know, common, goal To fight terrorism, and so that's how they were able to infiltrate and get in and have a so much access. I've written an article recently about the,↗

1:43:46Speaker 1the new tactic, I'm sure you guys have been hearing, you know, the Israelis, you know, rumbling about, you know, we don't need US, you know, aid anymore, we're really grateful, but, you know, I think it's time, it's time that, you know, we're, we're gonna create a path where we don't, you know, get, What they don't talk to you about or, you know, advertise is that what's happening is that there's a memorandum of understanding that is being negotiated between the Trump administration and there's certainly two bills, identical bills, one in the House and one in the Senate, that would, excuse me, codified into law,↗

1:44:26Speaker 1where they are now, you know, because the current MOU that gives them the four billion a year, ends in twenty twenty-eight, I believe. and so- So now they're renegotiating a new deal, and the new deal isn't aid to Israel, it's, you know, joint research and development into weapons and weapon systems, into advanced weapons and weapon systems. But what it is, is, you know, under that program, US taxpayers would actually pay more than four billion to Israel, and what it does is it's, it's like ten times worse than what we have right now. Right now, we're giving them money, and then they're, we're saying Use that money to buy weapons from, you know, from, US manufacture-- quote, US manufactured, you know,↗

1:45:16Speaker 1military companies, right? the military industrial complex, some of which is, really coming from, you know, they're purchasing from Israel themselves, but What this new MOU does is it literally in-integrates them into, you know, into our, what is it called, the NTSB, the National Technologies Strategic something or other. It's basically where our advanced technology sits. There's only a handful of countries, you know, the Five Eyes, that have access to this, and it basically removes any sort of trade barriers, right? So there's no,↗

1:45:55Speaker 1barriers In terms of, you know, strategic dual use items, because these people are, seen as very close allies, they have advanced, you know, technologies like us, so we share and we do joint research and development, and we also, you know, there are no barriers to trade and entry, and we're able to also bid on, you know, on contracts in each other's countries, blah, blah. But it's a very small group of countries, like it's literally the UK, Canada Canada,↗

1:46:27Speaker 1I think Australia, and, and I think that's it. I think those three are the ones that have the full access. They wouldn't integrate Israel into that program That happens and it's literally, I mean, that's like the worst thing that could possibly happen because then it's game over. I mean, they've like, will have access to everything 'cause right now, they still have to go through barriers of, you know, things that are like access controlled, but that would remove that, and we would be paying more than four billion a year for them to have access to that, right? So they're pivoting to these type of little sneaky, you know, far worse strategies to get around it. And And there is a panic to get it all done under the Trump administration because they know that they're under like a ticking time. It-- 'cause, you know, the, the perception is changing, the right, the left, center, everyone is now questioning this relationship with Israel. They don't like the money going there, they don't like the military spending, they don't like, you know, the diplomatic, cover that we give and the focus on this, you know, foreign country, and that we need to have a focus more on ourselves and trying to figure things out here. And so they know that they have literally like a two year period, and they're trying to, you know, roll this stuff out. So is it optimistic in the govern- you know, are we, is the perception changing drastically versus twenty years ago? Absolutely. But is our government moving along with the, you know, with the populace? No, they're actually moving into the opposite direction and trying to quickly enact these like laws, you know, so that these things get, you know, put on the books. Before the administration changes, before Congress changes, before a younger group of, you know, lawmakers come into office that don't align with, you know, with these initiatives, because as you guys know, once things are, you know, set into law, it's very difficult to reverse them. So, you know, they try to do this stuff so that, you know We're kind of like locked in. So I think that the bat-- it's very important for us now to be, you know, to get informed about this stuff and to push back as much as possible, because, you know,↗

1:48:44Speaker 1we don't need another ten-- and by the way, this MOU isn't ten years like the current one, it's a twenty-year MOU. I mean, they're literally-- they are very aware that they've gotta get this stuff in place because it's gonna be game over soon.↗

1:48:58Speaker 6Yeah, thanks, Genex. If I, if I may just quickly, Ian, just one more, one minute. Thanks for the answer, Genex. And, and look, the, the way I see it, I don't know if you guys can see it the same way, I see all the cards are stacked in your favor. Meaning, all right, if, if, if, let's say, if these two percent, of your population were, let's call them Rastafarians, right? And they have Rastafarian land that they're smooching off you and they're controlling your politics and they're doing all what they do, which is negative to the American people for the sake of, of that land they have, right? But that land was, you know, adheres to international law. It's really, you know, doesn't commit war crimes, it didn't, you know, ethnically cleanse and steal the land, doesn't, it doesn't, you know, do all that evil stuff that they do. It'll be so much harder For you guys, be-- because you don't have the material, you don't have the, the marketing material to bring attention to that cause, right? Because there's none. But Israel, I mean, they, they churn out material for you guys to say they're bad every day, like that you've got so much material, from their history of how it got created, of what, to what they do every day, to their rapes, to what they did to the Fatah, that every day they can, they supply you with so much material To be able to, to draw pub-- the public opinion, you know, to that topic, right? So imagine if they were really moral, like that, that'd be a problem how to get people's attention to that.↗

1:50:39Ian MalcolmRight, isn't it funny? It's like every day, oh man, it's gonna be difficult tomorrow to show people, and then boom, another genocide, another bombing, another↗

1:50:49Speaker 6murder. Right. Right. It's like a dream, and the rape, the rape of, like- They, they're giving you so much. They did the rape, and then↗

1:50:58Ian Malcolmthey, then they argue in their gaiety about being able to rape people. It's so insane.↗

1:51:05Speaker 6Right? Right? So it's such a gift to bring these people down. It's like, yeah, thank you, thank you. Just, just behave, be yourselves, please. Don't let, let us interrupt you of being yourselves, and then we can wake up the whole globe. And actually, the globe is waking up, man. Eight billion people around the globe are-- the majority of people are waking up. The problem is that when they got hit on October seventh, regardless what you think of that day, they screamed so loud that the whole globe like stood To see, oh, what, what's going on? And then when people started looking, well, what's going on? They went on their rampage, and everybody was shocked, like, "What's wrong with these people?" And they keep doing it. So that's one thing. The other thing, Jen, actually, you were saying, yeah, public opinion is better, you know, waking up to that, but the pressure they're putting on government Is, is like crazy, right? But that's also a good thing, because it, it helps you point out to the fact that the democracy in the US is kinda broken. You know, special interests, money, corporations, Citizen United, all that, you're not represented anymore. And what best case to show that you're not really represented or that the, the system is broken, then these people and the way they behave. They, they, it's very easy. I mean, just tell the story of What happened with Massey, and everyone will tell you, "Shit, man, your democracy is fucking broken." So that's also, you know, I see it as a positive for you guys. I know there's a lot of challenges. I mean, I, I was also yesterday on, on a Maespace, and, and, you know, there's a lot of challenges, but trust me, your enemy is dumb. You know, your opponent is dumb. Stupid, it's helping you, it gives you the marketing, it gives you the tools, it gives you the stories, you just have to churn it out and not be scared, and that's it. Anyway, Ian, I love you, Joanne, Mays, David, Mandy, the rest of you people, keep doing what you're doing. You, you-- The Axis of the Truth, all the power to you. I love you. Thanks.↗

1:53:09@joann_marieThank you so much, brother, and thank you so much for, for coming and I'm sorry about what's going on in Lebanon, but thank you. And we're, we're speaking about it every single day, so thank you so much, right? And we have David here. Hey, David, thank you so much for being here. How are you?↗

1:53:29Speaker 7Hi. I didn't even know you were holding a space. I guess you all just jumped, jumped in with Gen X here.↗

1:53:34@joann_marieYeah, it's so unexpected, but it's, it's, it's awesome. I got here late, w- as well, David. So it's okay.↗

1:53:43Speaker 1We just did an impromptu one because of the, the document drop that Gabrielle did. So we wanted to talk about it. I see Mays is on here. Mays, did you see my screenshot? You're in the report!↗

1:53:56Speaker 8I am just now catching up, I'm about to go through it. Thank you for putting me in there, Gen X girl, you are a legend. And you're on the list. I'm on the list. Hahaha. Another list. No, but I'm, I'm going through it now and catching up on, on what you guys are talking about. But I did hear you say that once infrastructure is rolled out, once things are in place, it's really difficult to undo. I 100% agree with that. And so now is that window of time where people can actually- Activate, mobilize, you know, rage against it, now is definitely the time.↗

1:54:32Speaker 1It is. And it's, and it's difficult because this stuff is so like convoluted. And I was talking to Ian earlier, I was like, you know, my frustration always is that, you know They make this stuff very difficult, very, you know, convoluted and lots of details and layers upon layers of stuff that you have to dissect. So trying to communicate that to like a wider audience always becomes very difficult, especially on like a platform like X, where, you know, like I always get frustrated where, like, you know, I post a meme and I put two words with it and it'll go viral, like I, you know, today, like,↗

1:55:11Speaker 1Trump, posted a picture- Of himself saying "locked in," so I changed the word to "locked in on BB's dick." That shit's going viral, and it pisses me off because then, you know, I put a document, I, you know, all this research into something that is so important and people need to pay, pay attention to, and you get fizzle. You know what I mean? 'Cause it's too much content, and, and it's like, you know, the challenge is always, how do you make it bite-sized? How do you make people understand, you know, like this is really↗

1:55:43Speaker 1Here it is in five bullets, you know? and I think that that's-↗

1:55:47@joann_marieNo, but they are actually pushing Goislup into people. Like if you actually put something really good, they suppress it and the absolute dumbest tweet ever, they like, the algo picks it and like pushes it. We were talking about it yesterday, so it's, it's absolutely horrific. They need to change- Operation↗

1:56:05Speaker 7Slap. Yes.↗

1:56:07@joann_marieI, I love the name of that operation. It's so- You know,↗

1:56:10Speaker 7for everything they're doing, for every- We have to hold on message with three important things. One is the Jewish supremacy is destroying all of Western civilization. The second thing is the Jewish supremacy is destroying all of Western civilization. The third thing, guess what it is? The Jewish supremacy is destroying all of Western civilization. The Matrix can't work if we all know it's a Matrix, and so if we just stay on message and keep this very simple and give examples of how that's so, and like our friend just said a minute ago, they do give a stat themselves, they do play out of turn in card parlance. So let's just stay on message, keep saying those things, make sure whatever you're saying funnels back into, let me see, I forgot, let me look at my notes here. Oh yeah. Jewish supremacy is destroying Western civilization.↗

1:57:04Ian MalcolmI'm gonna have to clip that tomorrow, David. But it is, and it's so funny because this goes back to, you know, essentially the, the entire conversation here, which is trying to do anything and everything to merely prevent us from being able to discuss this, because it really does just get to the point where nothing else matters. Once they see that piece, and then it's the Truman Show, and David, I know you always make this reference, right? Once you know that piece It doesn't matter what they offer you, it's like, "No, I, I know that it's all fake. I, I just wanna, just wanna discuss the truth. Like, you're a liar, obviously. " Right? So they, they can have everything, they can have all the money, all the influencers, all the media, all the celebrity, but doesn't matter 'cause nobody cares, right? It, it's really wild watching it fall apart as they, they crumble. It's like the emperor with no clothes as his new clothes, and he's just trying to scream↗

1:58:01Speaker 7And when Laura Loomer implies or tries to impugn by making people disclose or anything which they shouldn't have, have to have, do that, let's remember this, and this is another point of Western civilization, ideas don't have guilt by association. If we found out that Isaac Newton had risen from the bowels of hell to write the laws of motion, they would still be true. So all your work is ahead of you if you're the opposition to tell us why it isn't so when we postulate that, hold on, checking my notes again. Oh yeah, Jewish supremacists are destroying Western civilization. None of the other stuff matters because these are soft ad hominem attacks, right? Let's not forget that an ad hominem attack isn't just an attack on the person, but their motives, as if to say, "Oh, you're saying this just because you're motivated to do so by some ulterior motive." Motive. No pumpkin, that's you. I'm saying this because it's true. So the next time I say Jewish supremacists are destroying Western civilization, my ulterior motive is that I want to say, oh yeah, checking my notes again, Jewish supremacists are destroying Western civilization.↗

1:59:14@joann_marieI love David so much. I know. Okay. Pan, Panagotti. I don't know how to say this. I'm sorry.↗

1:59:23Speaker 2Yeah, yeah, Panagotti. It's fine.↗

1:59:25@joann_mariePanagotti.↗

1:59:27Speaker 2That's, that's okay. That's all right. I know it's hard to pronounce. I, I liked what the best of Gentiles said. He brought up something very important, and, and Generation X. the, what the best of Gentiles brought up was there is no organization. there was some, which was like APAC Tracker. which hit the Israeli lobby big time. they, they, they, they did a great job, going after the lobby↗

2:00:00Speaker 9and educating people and educating us as voters. you had a guy named Rechtenwald, I think he's going to the hospital, today, he posted- Yeah,↗

2:00:10Ian Malcolmthey just announced that, the surgery went well, which is, is wonderful news.↗

2:00:14Speaker 9Yeah, that's great news. I, I'm, I'm, I'm happy with what he was doing, but there, it's-- there needs to be more to be done. You need not only internet, but you need brick and mortar. You still need the, the, the, the people getting together in their communities. And like Generation, Gen X, are you, are you like a journalist?↗

2:00:39Speaker 10Just the hobbyists? Not just the hobbyists and journalists.↗

2:00:42Speaker 9Well, you know, in that group there could be a journalist. What you said was, about what happened in the nineties. I'm Generation X. you know, I also dealt with the Feds at that time and in the two thousands and before nine eleven and, and after nine eleven, yes, a lot of these things, the Jewish lobby took advantage of, when we were in a, a panic mode, when we were angry, they took advantage of it. I knew about the spying in two thousand and two, the illegal spying, and I brought that up actually to my handler, was really upset about it.↗

2:01:20Speaker 9you know, there was nowhere to turn to. we have nobody to turn to. We're, we're just yelling here on the internet, and that's on borrowed time, because, you see, you even said it, all of you, we're being censored. Little by little, we're being censored. I got kicked out for forty-five days. You know, Elon is no friend to us, okay? He knows that the only reason why we're totally not out of X is because, you know, he, he's worried about his money, his dollars, and he saw what happened,↗

2:01:52Speaker 9years back with when people were setting, some of the cars on fire at his dealership and, and graffiti. But eventually, he's gonna do it. They're all gonna do it. They're all gonna get us out, censor us completely, and then we have nothing. Right now, we have an opportunity to know ourselves. like I said, I got to see a lot of people, see where they stand, but other than that, we have nothing else. We don't have our own lobby, and that's where Recklingwald, I was happy, was starting, but it really got nowhere. I mean, that, that as a PAC should be in every county, in every state across the nation. I wish there was people out here in New Jersey that I can connect with, you know, and connect again with other people in other states. What the Israeli lobby has, it, and they're basically organized crime. They're sitting there, they go to their places where they gather all together, their businesses are connected, their politics is connected they, you know, they put their people inside, you know, offices of our senators. We should be doing that, not them, but we can't because we're not organized. We don't have that brick and mortar. We don't have that lobby. And unless we do that, we're finished, and we're running on borrowed time here. You, you know, this is, you know, I'm glad the, like,↗

2:03:20Speaker 9Wright said, I'm glad the American people have woken up. I'm, I'm American. And I, I've, I've dealt with the Jewish lobby, I've seen their crimes, I've seen how our government is, is, is, is, is in control, by the, the Israeli lobbies in Is-- in Israel. Why do you think we're running on borrowed time? They're not two percent.↗

2:03:42Speaker 11They're not two percent. They're forty percent. Hold↗

2:03:45Speaker 9Be- What do you mean why we're running out of time? They, they're gonna censor, they're already doing that. And, and some's gonna come up where, where, you know, you, you give these people more time, they're gonna figure something out. Maybe another nine eleven. I mean, that was, that was all, all, what was going on Benghazi, whatever it was. All those things could have been avoided.↗

2:04:03Speaker 9But why did they happen? The problem is, the problem is that the- The problem is↗

2:04:08Speaker 11that- The problem is that- The problem is that- The Is if you censor everything, COVID, all these other things, that was more possible back in the day, but now you just have to censor this one thing Right? If you tell everybody to not think about pink elephants, they're gonna think about pink elephants, right? And so to say you can't talk about this one thing right in the middle of the Great Awakening, nothing is going to stop this. Nothing is going to stop this Great Awakening. I am telling you that nothing stops an idea whose time has come, says Victor Hugo, and this idea's time has come. So, and I appreciate your feeling about us getting out there. I think we should. I think you're right I think that is the next step, I think it should happen anyway, and I think that that proves that we're taking another step in the great awakening, so I like that you said that. But do not, do not tremble in the fear that we're going to lose or we won't be able to talk. Nothing's going to stop this, there are no brakes on this train, and they know it.↗

2:05:16Speaker 10I think he, I think he is right though, and, and I, and you're agreeing as well, but that the ground game is the next thing, because even in the case of Massey's, election I know that a lot of people immediately went to, you know, that this, this had to be rigged. and I, I was silent on that because I don't believe that that, and Massey himself, you know, posted that, you know, he wasn't gonna, pursue that because he didn't think that that was the case, and that turnout was definitely the difference, right?↗

2:05:53Speaker 10what I've seen in the since-- and I've been tracking this since twenty twenty-four's elections. Is that what transpires online doesn't reflect elections on the ground. It does, maybe in the future But in twenty twenty-four and in the primary so far this year, it doesn't translate because there is a difference between the,↗

2:06:23Speaker 10the age segment that's online versus those that are voting on the ground. Old people vote, they vote like it's their religion, you know, the boomers that everybody blames, you know, and, and rightfully for Massey's defeat because they came out in droves, right? And voted. And young people Have not taken that turn yet to out-vote them. On the morning of Massey's election, I posted about that, that hey, Gen Z, Millennials, you gotta get out, you can out, you know, you can cancel the Boomer and the Gen X vote. I threw my own generation in there, but you guys have to come out, but you're not, and that's the problem, the young people aren't coming out to vote. They are heavily active online, but they're not, that doesn't translate to them voting, on the ground. Whereas boomers do. In this trove of documents that, you know, that was, released this morning, one of the surveys, there's an eight page survey on here that specifically asks fifty five and older Christian evangelicals what motivates them, who do they listen to, what is their priorities, how is Israel important to them? You know, and it, they're, they do these surveys, you know, for a purpose. They're identifying what triggers these people. So then when they develop their messaging for this segment of the vi-population that's still alive, still voting, still active, you know, that they can then continue to, you know, develop messaging around that to get these people out. So when Trump posts, you know, get out and go vote for Ed Goulian, who's running out there? These old people who have no idea and can't tell the difference between AI-generated ad and a real, and real content. So we have, we have an age discrepancy between what's happening online versus what happens on the ground.↗

2:08:35Speaker 9But it's also that, that brick and mortar, that, that, like, like, look, you have groups like, anti-abortion groups, or you had Black Lives Matter or LGBTQ groups, they actually have a group. It's not only online,↗

2:08:54Speaker 9using, social media to get the message out. They have a group set up, they have a lobby set up. And unless that's done here, you know, it's gonna be very difficult.↗

2:09:07Speaker 10Absolutely, I totally agree with you.↗

2:09:10@joann_marieAnd a lot of them, of those groups are actually getting paid by the Jews to, to go and infiltrate them. Yeah, they infiltrate those groups.↗

2:09:16Speaker 9They, they infiltrated those groups, especially the LGBT group, G-T-Q, group. The, the, they, they in-- they go in there and they got their person that, that starts yapping and, and trying to, I've, I've been to a lot of, Groups, political, a-and you're always gonna have that Jew in there that's gonna try to, suppress somebody, call you stupid, oh, I'm, I'm, I'm taking over, type of deal, and they do. And, and they, they shouldn't let 'em do it. You know, it's just that, but, but we need to get together. People need to get together because that way you share information. And not only that, somebody mentioned lawyers. How expensive are lawyers? So when they come after you, they come after one For, for what we believe in, we have lawyers. We can-- you can have the money, the funding, the lawyers, or, you know, you look at the, the girls that were, you know, molested and, and violated by Epstein, they had nowhere to turn to. These were Americans, and shame on us as Americans that there were Americans out there screaming for help, victimized, and nobody was listening.↗

2:10:28Speaker 9Where's that tell you? Just that case alone, it disgusts me as an American. It's disgusting. So many girls were, were molested, raped, young children, and they were speaking out, speaking out, and for three decades? Come on, the DOJ is that incompetent? No, they were protecting Jews, because every time there's a crime, and I know this, I've seen this with my eyes in there, okay? There's a crime that involves Jews in Israel,↗

2:11:01Speaker 9you know, under the rug. But if there's people there that are willing to listen to these victims, or a place where they can go to and say, "Hey, listen, we're here." To go out on the street and say, "Listen," then they're gonna see an angry crowd. Okay? That's how, s-some of these groups, you know, when, when you, you know, I don't b-believe what some of the times people went out on the street, you know, like, you know, when, when there was, incidents with police officers,↗

2:11:30Speaker 9i-in shootings, but some of them, you know, people had to go out on the street. Some of them, no, the people, you know,↗

2:11:42Speaker 9But they had a place to go to, they had the NAACP to go to, they had, they formed Black Lives Matter, you know?↗

2:11:51Speaker 9And things changed. If, if we don't do that, you know, put our politics aside and say, "Look, this is a national security threat. So it shouldn't matter what, you know, party you're in, what your belief is in, this is a, a national security issue." We're in trouble.↗

2:12:12@joann_marieYeah, thank you so much, Ben. I don't know how to say it. and talking about someone that they came after that is one of us, Jonathan Cagle, is still in jail, guys. So please keep talking about what, what happened to him. And yeah, they are protected, I think. if, I don't know if you guys remember that a couple of months ago or maybe a week, a month ago, I don't know, there was an illegal bio lab in Las Vegas that contained like- HIV and dengue and stuff like that, that was,↗

2:12:43@joann_marieby Odi Salomon, and the same person who freed Alexanderovich, that is the Federal District Attorney of Nevada, Segal Chata A Yu, that is like, she was born in Israel, she freed them, both of them. So yeah, they don't get held to any accountability, so it's pretty crazy.↗

2:13:02Speaker 9And- Yeah, but do we know who the victims are? Or, or do we know if they have any victims? Then there's probably people out there that- I wanna come. Who's gonna, who's gonna listen to them? The, the, the, the, the, the media, the media that they control. I've been through that. You know, I, I know what these girls have been through. You know, they're, they're not gonna listen. That's why there needs to be a place. And, and, and, you know, Reckon World, I told 'em a bunch of times, hey, I'm willing to go out there and talk to you. I'm willing to, to, to do some legwork↗

2:13:37@joann_marieIt is very important. Thank you so much for coming up, and, yeah, I hope, I hope people do meet in person and, and talk about, about all those things and raise awareness. So thank you so much for coming up. Alright, it's Vlad, yeah, go for it, Vlad.↗

2:13:54Speaker 12Yeah, good to see you, me and Genex and Joanne. I'm gonna say, I said this before, that I, I kind of confronted one Israeli and I said, "You guys look like you're losing the PR war, you know? That, this is coming to a boiling point. a lot of them, they're starting to realize, that America is becom-becoming fed up with their country, that you go to Israel, you got free healthcare, you got all this free education, all these- These different free things for their citizens, and they're still taking money out of our country, and we got,↗

2:14:35Speaker 12sixty thousand homeless, homeless veterans who served this country, and they're on the street. They can't get no help. You know, there's a lot of situations like this, and for example, in, I don't know if it was May Space yesterday or Ian Space, but some, some guy named R-RD Krotz or something, he was telling us about humanity, and these people, they reached such a low That they're now trying to convince the world that what they're doing is a self-defense of,↗

2:15:08Speaker 12humanitarian-like, measure, you know? That there's nothing wrong with this, that they're taking just self-defense measures, and they're not really doing anything. And, this isn't gonna fly by people, you know? This isn't gonna fly by Americans who are looking at this like, "Oh, we're about to get sent..." Halfway across the ocean,↗

2:15:34Speaker 12to die for Israel, that's what's gonna happen to us, and you guys are gonna be, then, stepping on our graves, on our American graves, and you guys are gonna be laughing there, you know, like the Israelis that you are, you guys are gonna be spitting at our direction. That's, that's, that's the future that holds for us if we don't step up and do something about it. Yeah. And they also see this as the final opportunity Opportunity to destroy Iran because, they've never encountered such an opportunity where,↗

2:16:09Speaker 12and I hate to admit this, I hate to admit this, that Russia is compromised, i-it's on the Israeli order, America is on the Israeli order, you know, these countries they have to submit to Israel, and so now that they have all their stones in, in their hand, they want to do something. They- They, they, they are desperately, they want to do a final blow to Iran or I don't know what they wanna do, but their hands are itching for war, they're itching for war, and you can see it, yeah, you can see it in their fea-in their faces when they're talking, like, Mrs. Stealthy, who has no medical experience, and she's over there yelling, "Ah, Israelis, do you see how much anti-Semitism we have in this country?" They're getting very fed up, yeah, they're coming to a boiling point. so, but, but the good news is where? That this revolution in this was, pause and hold on a second, we're not gonna help Israel no more. That kind of action, it doesn't come from Russia, it doesn't come from China. Come from United States of America, that's where it starts from. Because I told people that if you don't start it here, if you don't defend the US Constitution, the United States of America, if you don't defend the United States of America, you're gonna get Russia, you're gonna get North Korea here, and you know what that means? That you can't even pick up a piece of paper to protest. That's what that means, guys. You gotta get your head together and you gotta- I gotta tell the Israelis, no more communion. Just like what my American priest, I, I was talking on, I wanted really to touch this on yesterday, Ian, the Anglo, how you had that topic yesterday. Some Catholics say, "Oh, we can, we can be friends with the Israelis." You know what my American Orthodox priest told me? American Eastern Orthodox, Christian priest told me here in California, San Francisco. When I was 18, I got baptized into the church. I got invited, by some Israeli friends. They're like, "Oh, bro, I see you got baptized into a Christian Orthodox church. How 'bout you come to our Jewish synagogue and we'll debate you." Before I did that, before I dis- I wanted to go, I called up my priest and I said, "Hey, Father," 'cause you have to address them by Father, you know, and then their name. "My Father, can I go to the synagogue? Do you think it's a-appropriate for me as a Christian to go there?" and, and you know, debate with them and stuff like this. And he's like, "You know what?↗

2:19:02@joann_marieThere's no communion with the devil."↗

2:19:05Speaker 12There's no communion with the devil. There's no communion what the Father told me. There's no communion with the devil. You can't enter the synagogue and start communion with these people, communi-- debating. There's no debating. There's no arguing. There's no ceasefires with these people. Nothing. They're liars. You can't, argue with them, you can't negotiate with them, you know, there's nothing that they're, we, we, you can't hold on what these people stand, theirs, they can't stand on because the only thing they have is lies, you know?↗

2:19:40Speaker 12So yeah, I don't like those lukewarm Christians. I won't say it, I have to say it, like honey badger, honey badger. You know? She's not a↗

2:19:49@joann_marielukewarm Christian.↗

2:19:51Speaker 12Okay,↗

2:19:51@joann_mariestop. No, she, she's awesome. And thank you so much for coming up. Alright, and Genex Girl needs to step down, but guys, please give her a follow. She makes amazing, amazing, amazing reports on everything. So, and it's always amazing having you here. So thank you so much, Genex Girl, and go for it!↗

2:20:12Speaker 10Yeah, thank you guys. It was great talking to everybody. and, hopefully I'll join again sometime soon. But thank you. And↗

2:20:20Ian MalcolmI just, I wanna thank you sincerely, Jen Axel for all the work that you've been doing, for the reporting on this. the, the moment that, data drop, was released, she sent me a screenshot, and she was like, "Have you seen this? " she is on top of all of this in ways that very few are, so I wanna give her a massive amount of credit.↗

2:20:42Ian MalcolmSo also kind of check your brain, 'cause I don't know why we haven't done that in the past, but, but I also wanted to just, of course, note, as we wind this down, this is kind of an impromptu conversation, we do have another space that's gonna be in about three or four hours, that is gonna be with the one and only Rabbi Malious. He's going to be debating the subject of genetics, with IQ via JQ, which, also n-goes by Amiru on this app. So very excited↗

2:21:12Ian MalcolmEspecially includes you, my friend, as well as David Nitchie and all of the others. I wanna give a big shout out as well to Miss Mays, to Honey Badger, as always, to Joanne, the host co-hostess with the mostess, and I do think, in all sincerity, the best thing that we can do is to not only speak about this issue with anybody and everybody that's willing to discuss it, but with those that are subversive elements intellectually, punch up Do not be ashamed or afraid, whether it's, a small account, if it's Ben Shapiro, if it's ratioing Mark Levin with moldy bread, or in this case, with Ashton Forbes, this little dweeb who walks around in the White House and, put out some nonsense, and I, I, I just had to respond, right? 'Cause there he is shilling, as he always does, for the same usual suspects, and all it takes is replying, or maybe you're just a monumentally dishonest c*k For Jewish supremacy that's sold out to Israel and their lobby, right? Just be bold and be direct. Don't use profanity, don't do anything that will get you kicked off this platform, 'cause we need everybody's voice. Be careful with your verbiage. That's why I used the ones that I did in there, right? Go up to that line, be careful to never cross it, because again, building up those follower accounts, just like we saw yesterday in the space on X and all the trapdoors, they haven't designed so it's very difficult for us to grow. Gen Has been hovering right under a hundred thousand, the same way that Joanne and I talked about how yesterday I had the exact same experience. Ninety-nine point eight thousand, point nine thousand, ninety-nine point six thousand, day after day, week after week, right? They have all of these things in here to discourage us, get us disgruntled, and to ensure that we don't grow. Don't worry about it. Keep pushing forward as best you can, like David said, make it more and more clear to everybody what the obvious, common problem is, which is Which is Jewish supremacy. I've seen that term flying everywhere the last couple weeks. This is the thing that David Neeleman was using and hammering that terminology, right? Doesn't mean hating Jews, doesn't mean blaming Jews, but to say, "I don't wanna be lorded over by Jewish supremacy, which basically wants to steal my rights, to tell me I'm not allowed to notice that it's happening, to criminalize the act of discussing that it is, and to just idly stand by as my nation goes to hell in a handbasket for the benefit of another." That is Supremacy, we are done with it. We, I'm going to continue calling everybody that will bend the knee to that a Jewish supremacy cuck. And I'll continue trying to do everything I can to bring all of these truths to all of you. So do your little parts, right? Just show up, just raise your hand, just raise your voice, just talk with anybody and everybody that you can, and we will win. So I will see all of you in that space in a couple hours with Mr. Malias, and then we have another conversation tomorrow, again on genetics, this time,↗

2:24:09Ian MalcolmFrom the black community to discuss what is going on over there. He's one of the most intelligent individuals from that world that I've seen on this app, so I'm excited for both of those, excited for the ride with you. God bless, Godspeed to everybody wherever you are in the world. Good morning, good evening, good afternoon. Jen, ex-girl, as always, God bless and Godspeed to everything that you do, my friend. We will see you all a little bit later.↗