Held here entire — 1,908 passages across 12 chapters and 4 named voices, set down from the first word to the last.
- 0:00Numbers Don't MatterThe host explains why follower counts are meaningless compared to community and truth.
- 2:58The Truth vs. LiesThe host discusses how media personalities spread misinformation, not out of ignorance, but deliberate deception.
- 6:27X Platform CensorshipThe host details how the platform actively suppresses accounts discussing certain topics, revealing their fear of the truth.
- 10:39Community and Movement GrowthSpeakers celebrate the growing community and the increasing mainstream discussion of previously taboo topics.
- 28:55Jewish Control of InstitutionsA guest challenges the host on Jewish influence in media, banking, and technology, leading to surprising concessions.
- 37:06IQ and Nepotism DebateThe discussion shifts to the role of IQ versus nepotism in Jewish success, with examples from Hollywood and finance.
- 46:12Jewish Role in SlaveryThe host and guests present historical evidence of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, challenging a guest's claims.
- 55:02Holocaust and ReparationsThe conversation delves into the Holocaust narrative, the 6 million figure, and the moral justification for German reparations.
- 1:05:39Jewish Influence on Western DeclineThe host argues that Jewish control of power structures has led to the decline of the Western world across various metrics.
- 1:14:03The 'Good Jew' ChallengeA guest is challenged to name admirable Jewish figures, leading to a contentious discussion about historical and modern examples.
- 1:21:48Loyalty and Dual CitizenshipThe debate intensifies over Jewish loyalty to nations and the implications of dual citizenship, using Jonathan Pollard as an example.
- 1:30:04The Path Forward: Truth and CautionThe host concludes with a message of optimism, emphasizing the importance of truth, community, and navigating censorship carefully.
The Transcript
Speaker 1Congratulations.
Ian MalcolmWell, we'll see. We'll see. We'll rock that in the background here for a second. Try not to trip the little censors here that are going to get very upset because we're playing a little song. And here's the irony. We'll bring up a couple friends here. It's supposed to be a celebration. And the irony... is that we are not in position to celebrate, at least not yet.
Ian MalcolmBut we are. And I say that because these things are but numbers. They're numbers on a screen, numbers on a disingenuous application that is dishonestly and disingenuously presenting the reality of, say, the popularity of our personas. Because were just voices in the void, right? These are messages in the ether. And at any point in time, they can, of course, just be shut down without remorse, without regard.
Ian MalcolmAnd those in charge certainly have absolute authority and power over how they wield the censorship that is their, quote unquote, protection against hate speech. which seems to be defined as anything and everything that's inconvenient for those in control, which is de facto, let's be real. It's intellectual authoritarianism, obviously, overtly.
Ian MalcolmI'd even go as far as to say smugly, because those who are responsible for such not only pretend as if it's not happening, they also pretend that they have no control on the very people that are wielding that authoritarian censorship would say that they have to do it because of animus against their group, which is actually begotten by the very act of the censorship that they're able to wield because they have all of this power and all of this control and all this authority.
Ian MalcolmAnd so the numbers on the screen, they truthfully do not matter. They don't matter to me. They shouldn't necessarily matter to you. They can be used as barometers, I suppose, of either quote unquote celebrity, which would be loosely defined to somebody like Kanye West. But let's be real. The follower counts and all this other nonsense, if that is any way a reflection on the popularity of a persona or their ideas, you would think that Ben Shapiro with his, I think it's now six or seven million followers, that when he posts up a link to his live broadcast, I think it's brought to you via YouTube.
Ian MalcolmYou would think that when he shares that and says, on this day's talking points, we're going to cover, you would think that he would get not just hundreds or thousands, but tens of thousands of likes and wonderful comments and excitement. And yet then this little, this little handle in the ether comes out of right field.
Ian MalcolmIt's tiny by contrast. It's a fraction of the size and it just, just shouts out. You tell us. From way in the distance. And yet we ratio Ben Shapiro with his 7 million followers or six or whatever it is. Now, what does that tell us? Right. If the numbers on this screen are to mean something or to represent anything, Elon Musk has 200 and I think it's now 31 million followers or something like that.
Ian MalcolmHe posts up anything and everything and he gets countless views, of course. But what do those numbers even mean? Because the last time I paid attention to it, it was from Nick Fuentes ratioing Elon Musk. Prior to that, it was Ian Carroll ratioing Elon Musk, the biggest handle on this entire application. So it's not necessarily a barometer of popularity.
Ian MalcolmIt shouldn't be necessarily viewed as an indicator of righteousness. Clearly not, because there's lots of accounts that clearly lie that have huge followings. But what it can be used as is an opportunity for us to all band together. And to recognize that regardless of that number, regardless of the likes or the shares or any of those other things, what we should actually be paying attention to is the, let's say, the shift that we either notice via our noticing or that we are perhaps not just noticing, but maybe that shift that we are constructing, which I think we are.
Ian MalcolmI think we are of paramount importance in the awakening to this set of uncomfortable norms. And we know that that's the case because we continue growing. TruthTeller is up to 130,000 followers now. I remember doing my first space with him when he was about, not just a third that, he was maybe even a quarter that number.
Ian MalcolmI think he had 30 or 20,000 followers some of the early days that we did spaces, right? And simultaneously, I remember just being here with a couple hundred. Some of which, actually, for what it's worth, I still am in touch with. And I really, I value that. And that is the thing. 100,000, 200,000, a million. Does it matter if it's not a community that you are growing with or are a part of?
Ian MalcolmIs Ben Shapiro's six or seven million supposed followers? Is that actually a group that gets behind him, that rallies to him, that supports him? I don't think so. And we know that that's the case because if I could ratio little Ben Shapiro, then what could Nick Fuentes do with his Gripers, right? What could Ian Carroll do?
Ian MalcolmAnd these are all individuals that, you know, regardless if you like everything they say, some of the things they say, whatever, the thing that's important on this application is the, let's say the intensity of the community that you are part of. And I think that's actually the most important thing that we can help to garner and to construct is that intensity, the veracity, if you will, of people who just want to band behind one another.
Ian MalcolmThey want to support one another. And we see that because on this application, and I see that we've got Mr. Jeff Epstein up here, another warrior for truth, right? It doesn't matter if it's his account or we saw this earlier today with Adam Media. who is a friend of, let's just say, this movement. And Alex Jones, with his TV program, with his fame and his books and his, I suppose, millions of dollars, although I think he got sued for what, like a billion dollars for the Sandy Hook shooting.
Ian MalcolmIt is my belief that Alex Jones is completely 1,000% compromised, that he's controlled. And it's reasonable for me to conclude that, given the fact that some of the people on his own show have left the program. and made that assessment of him. Now I bring that up because Alex Jones shared again, Adam media's content, who is a friend of our movement.
Ian MalcolmHe's got a huge fight. He's probably one of the biggest, let's say in this movement, aside from, from perhaps Nick Fuentes, of course, it's probably the biggest person that I've spoken with regularly, who I really believe to be sincere and genuine. He also seems to be fighting for intellectually, of course, the good. He's got a good moral compass, it seems, based on everything I've observed, both publicly and in DMs with the individual.
Ian MalcolmAnd Alex Jones shared his content and essentially mocked him. And I bring that up because I then went into the comment section. I said, who's more sincere, Alex Jones or Adam Median? Last time I checked, it was like 90% for Adam. And what's my point in that is that Alex Jones might have a larger microphone. might be heard by more people, but do people really care?
Ian MalcolmAnd that is the interesting thing about this application. It doesn't matter how big the audience is, how big the numbers are. What matters is how meaningfully people will try to come to your aid, come to support your ideas, come to help expand this message. And the reality is people are starting to recognize that there are those who share the truth.
Ian MalcolmAnd there are those who are clearly lying. And for the most part, it seems that those, and let's give a third bucket. There are those that are ignorant. I assume that they're out there as well. But what's weird is being in these rooms and these conversations and coming to the obvious conclusion that for the most part, the people with the microphones who are, let's say, providing misinformation, it's getting harder and harder and harder for us to presume that that is merely due to ignorance.
Ian MalcolmWe can certainly apply ignorance to the boomers. You can't apply it any longer to the people on television, to the Mark Levins of the world. It's not an accident that he still believes that Israel is America's greatest ally. No, he's Jewish. He's a Zionist. He's a shill. And he clearly pushes Jewish supremacy. How do we know that?
Ian MalcolmBecause he introduces Donald Trump. And what does he say? He doesn't say this is the MAGA president. No, he says this is the first Jewish president of the United States. That's how he introduces him. So is it reasonable to presume that the thing that he values about that man is, I suppose, the fact that he's Jewish? That's weird.
Ian MalcolmIt's not my statement. I can't conclude that. I wasn't there at the synagogue when they brought Donald Trump with his little Cheeto complexion up onto, I don't even know what it would be. The stage, the podium, up next to the individuals doing the metzopay with the little baby penis, right? I wasn't there. But what I do know is that Mark Levin made that statement.
Ian MalcolmHe's nominated twice. So it's probably reasonable to conclude that maybe he's not lying. And just like Levin, all these other media personalities, doesn't matter if you talk to Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, the BBC, New York Times, these people are not ignorant. They are merely lying. The people at Turning Point USA, Israel's our greatest ally.
Ian MalcolmDon't listen to anybody who says that this Charlie Kirk shooting might have had anything else behind it. They're all lying to you. At least that's what they will say. I think it's reasonable to suggest at this point that they're all paid, they're all paid off, or they're all in on it. And so why do I bring this up? Because our goal is to get out not to the dissenters, not to those that push the propaganda.
Ian MalcolmWe need to get out to those that are just honestly ignorant, that are trying to understand why the world is so backwards. Why is it? that the Republican gets into office, nothing changes. The guy promises the great big, beautiful wall. It never happens. Instead, you got deregulation and lowered taxes for the elites of the elites.
Ian MalcolmThat was basically it. Trump comes back into office. He can promise, oh, I don't know that he's going to do mass deportations. Hasn't happened. They've actually obscured those numbers. That's kind of weird. The numbers that the government's putting out clearly go against other numbers that the government puts out. How weird.
Ian MalcolmAnd they certainly are going against those that are being rounded up by some of the private sector and the think tanks. It's almost as if they're lying. And why? Because they don't have any interest in the truth. That's unfortunately the reality of this situation. We are being lied to in every direction by almost everybody with a big megaphone.
Ian MalcolmSo why do I mention this? Well, because here we are trying to be able to create a bigger voice, trying to be able to celebrate that perhaps we're getting there. And lo and behold, We aren't. We have not made it. We were incapable of crossing that little threshold. Now, this could be, you could have people that would be frustrated because they would look at it and the vanity would just kind of get them in the rear end.
Ian MalcolmThey'd be so, they'd be butthurt, as they say. I find this beautiful. It is wonderful. I am ecstatic that I made this post, that I made this space, and that we did not cross the threshold. Do you know why? Because today alone, according to the metrics from X, I've received another 130 new followers. Now what's curious about that is that I've lost 30.
Ian MalcolmWe can do some basic math here, folks. What's 130 minus 30? It's 100. And yet yesterday I was 99.9 thousand followers. Perfectly on the number. So let's presume that I was right there at 99.9, which I probably was. It's probably 99.95 or 15 or whatever. So I've gathered an extra 100 plus followers since I made this post.
Ian MalcolmThat's the net number. And yet we're not at 100,000. So what does it tell us? Obviously, what is the obvious conclusion to arrive at? And let's see, what is the exact number at this very moment? Just so we get 99.9.
Ian Malcolm90. So we're 10 short, but here's the beauty. And I've done the math. So now I know based on just the mathematics for every two, I gain, we lose one right off the bat. That's just how this seems to work. And I say that because in the two week window where I broke down all the numbers gained 15 plus hundred, but only gained 700 in terms of, of on app numbers, let's call them.
Ian MalcolmSo that actually means even more. I need to gain like 2.2 followers to gain one because they will take away at least one every second edition. Now, this is crazy to me. It's bewildering, not necessarily because they're doing it because we know the fact that they're doing these things. What's wild is the degree to which they're doing it, the intensity of it, the overtness of it.
Ian MalcolmAnd that is the thing that is really interesting. Because what does it tell us? What does it tell us about our efforts on this application? Well, certainly that they fear it, otherwise they wouldn't suppress it. But why do they fear it? What does that tell us? Oh, that's right. That they have not won. That they fear that they can lose.
Ian MalcolmAnd that ultimately we should take from that, that we are in the driver's seat. Because we know what they are going to try and do, which is to take the car, off the cliff. They want, at least in my worldview, which is seemingly heavily suppressed, this is global Zionism or global Jewry or communism or whatever you want to call it.
Ian MalcolmJewish supremacy, the JQ, the Jewish question. They want to take the West and drive it off a cliff. And after doing so, lord over the ashes, probably from the greater Israel, although potentially if that doesn't work out as planned. perhaps down in Central America, seems to be maybe the offshoot. Hence this entire war that we've got going on with Venezuela, perhaps.
Ian MalcolmSo why do I bring these things up? Because that's the direction they want to take us in. But they wouldn't care if they had already won. They wouldn't be concerned if we were incapable of doing anything. And so if they are, let them suppress us. Let them embarrass themselves because they make it so overt that they do the suppressing that we can all make a big joke out of it.
Ian MalcolmMaybe it'll get to 100,000 at some point. I don't care. Totally indifferent. Because at this point, I can go into basically any large Zionist account. It doesn't matter at this point if it's a politician, a celebrity, if it's a political commentator, Ben Shapiro. Yes, I cannot ratio Elon Musk. It's not going to happen.
Ian MalcolmThat cat is way out of the bag. But these other accounts, we can. And so do not worry about these numbers. That's the biggest takeaway of this entire celebration is that it doesn't matter. The numbers don't matter. They are meaningless. What matters is the fact that we can open this room. We can have this conversation.
Ian MalcolmA hundred something people come in and it's a little conversation. There's no big planning. There's no big guest. There's nothing other than prospectively celebrating a little silly number. But that little silly number is trivial in comparison. to what it means that in spite of all the suppression and the censorship and the shadow banning and the removal of our spaces from the spaces tab, the fact that a lot of people don't get notified about it, that the audio cuts out for people over and over and over again.
Ian MalcolmAnd I know that that happens because it's mentioned in the purple pill. Every space we do, I get DMS about it all the time. Let them remove the followers. Let them suppress the content. Let them say that follower counts don't matter. The thing that does is whether you have engaging content, which basically means do you suck off the D of Israel and Jewish supremacy?
Ian MalcolmAnd if you don't, you're just not going to get views. Sorry. Well, guess what, Elon? I'm not monetized. I'm not trying to be monetized. I don't care. The shekels don't matter. And as long as more and more and more people come to the recognition that that is the reality of the war, intellectually speaking, that we are in.
Ian MalcolmWe are all doing our best to just emulate whomever is your North Star of righteousness. Pick up your little cross, and it could be literally around your neck. It could be a little splinter that you might have in the bottom of your foot because you stepped funny on a boardwalk when you were a kid. Doesn't matter. Whatever little piece of wood or crucifix you can muster, just carry it with you and recognize that this thing that we're in, you're not going to get the followers.
Ian MalcolmYou're not going to get the monetization. You won't get the shekels. But you'll be able to lay your head down at night enthused, excited, relaxed, content, and joyous. Because again, you can get all the pleasure in the world out of the nonsensical shekels and all of the frivolities that come with it. But those things are all temporary.
Ian MalcolmWhat's not is going to be decades from now. And I know this sounds really abstract and strange. But in some way, in a distant future that I all hope we're able to enjoy. whether it's in a peaceful, beautiful place that we find ourselves tomorrow having removed this toxin from our system, or whether it's in a proverbial gulag, I hope not a literal one, but I'll be able to at least know that like Solzhenitsyn wrote all those decades ago, a Nobel Prize winning author and historian, oh, by the way, he said how much different it could have been if we only had have asked ourselves what could be accomplished by going outside
Ian Malcolmrather than waiting indoors to see if they were going to knock on ours to arrest us. Because that's not what we're doing. Instead, we're being honest. We're trying to bring attention to this power structure. And in doing so, we're ultimately going to help others identify it. We're going to help wake up more of those people that presently are ignorant.
Ian MalcolmAnd in doing so, we do everything that we can realistically be expected to do to make the world a better place. That is Christlike. or again, whatever your North Star is, whether it's Jesus, whether it's Frodo Baggins, Luke Skywalker, Harry Potter, take your pick. We are doing the good fight, the righteous, sincere, and ultimately in a weird way, the holy endeavor, just like all those that came before.
Ian MalcolmAnd so with that, I know it's not the excitement that we're maybe hoping, or at least some might. It's not a silly number. We'll get there eventually. It doesn't matter. But let them give us another day, another demonstration of the absurd suppression. And if we happen to cross that number at some point in the next 40 minutes, which probably won't happen, we'll play a little song.
Ian MalcolmI might play Queen. That was the thing I was thinking about. We are the champions. Because again, it's not about me or I or mine. None of those things matter. What matters is the we. that we are collectively building here online and that we will ultimately become in a not so distant future where we are able to shake off the shackles of this absurdity.
Ian MalcolmAnd so I want to thank everybody for being here. We'll do about a 45, what is it, 40 minute or so more discourse. Let's do a round robin. Let's talk about what's going on in the world. If we hit a little number, I'll play a jingle. If not, I don't care. But what we will do in 40 minutes is we'll take everybody that's in here that wants to participate.
Ian MalcolmAnd you know what we're going to do? We're going to go over to Leonardo Joni's room. He sent me a very nice note earlier today asking if I would come in because she is going to be hosting to try and bring attention to one of the largest political candidates that's currently out there saying we're done with Jewish supremacy.
Ian MalcolmSo think about that for a moment. Two years ago, I was typing away on my little device here trying to spread awareness. And everybody that read it said, look at this crazy lunatic. He's an anti-Semite. And now there's literally politicians that their messaging is we need to get rid of Jewish supremacy. We've got Dr. Michael Rechtenwald and the Azapak movement that is going to bring about sincere change.
Ian MalcolmWe've got people that are talking about these issues. We've got the brother of Tucker Carlton, Buckley, who is out clearly discussing Jewish supremacy. as Tucker Carlson's going up at TPUSA and being labeled by Ben Shapiro an anti-Semite for merely noticing that there's some unusual things going on with Israel and Jews in America.
Ian MalcolmSo think about what that means. Think about what the inevitable result is when the world tells Tucker Carlson you're an anti-Semite for saying things he knows to be true, as his brother, who he apparently talks to every day, is saying, hey, by the way, you might want to look at these handles over here, like Truth Teller and Ian Malcolm.
Ian Malcolmthat Buckley's commented on a bunch of times. Weird. It's almost like we are, again, making monumental waves. So let them suppress and censor as it doesn't matter. If we can sincerely, I said this at the beginning of this year, I said, if we can move the needle forward far enough, this calendar year, we will find the mainstream media talking about
Ian MalcolmJewish supremacy. That inevitably has happened. Maybe not in the way or the degree that we might like, but people are clearly discussing that there's rising antisemitism. Why? Why does the mainstream media have to discuss that? Because people are starting to connect the dots. Now think about this. If in 2026, Tucker Carlson takes a major stage.
Ian MalcolmOh, I don't know what like turning point USA and says Jewish supremacy is a real problem in America. That's a huge win. Again, things that we would have thought just 24 months ago, utterly impossible. So do not be discouraged. Do not care about the numbers. Don't care about the likes, the follows, any of that. It is all meaningless and trivial.
Ian MalcolmWhat does is that just like the guy who died on a cross with literally nothing, no followers, no likes, no retweets. And I mean, frankly, it's unfair because none of this existed back then. But he did have a couple followers. You might say that he had his apostles. And what did they do? They built an entire religion on the cornerstone of Peter that became something that now has influenced billions of people.
Ian MalcolmThe most arguably famous, if not important person in the history of the world was censored, silenced, suppressed, beaten, and literally crucified. And the world has forever been a better place because of him. That doesn't even matter if you're not a Christian, oh, by the way, because inevitably Christian values in the West is largely derivative of those ideals.
Ian MalcolmAnd so if you're enjoying your life and you're fighting for it and you care to defend what is left of that beautiful place, it's largely because of those ideals, because of that man who, again, had no followers outside of those apostles, one of which, oh, by the way, denied him those three times, right? And so we are going to win.
Ian MalcolmWe're going to make the world a beautiful place. 100,000 doesn't matter. Maybe it'll happen tomorrow. Maybe it won't happen for a week. But Joanne, just like I told you, they'll continue just whittling it down. Let them do it. Let them expose the ruse and the game. We've got all the data. They clearly remove them at a rapid rate, and they do it from all of you as well for what it's worth.
Ian MalcolmIt doesn't matter if you have 90,000 or 9,000 or 900, probably even if you have 90.
Ian MalcolmThey're going to sabotage everything you do because the thing that they fear most is us just peacefully getting together. So with that, Joanne, I apologize for the little tirade. I apologize that we didn't hit the quote unquote milestone, but who cares anyway? It's a chance to get everybody together. And like I said, we'll do a 35 minute or so little rotation.
Ian MalcolmAnd then we'll go over to Miss Leonardo Joni's page and her space. And we'll see if this politician can indeed bring some of these challenges and charges to the mainstream. So Joanne, let's jump over to you and then we can kind of go through some hands if people want to comment.
@joann_marieIan, well, I am really happy and congratulations. I know they take them away, but each and every one that you get and also everyone in this movement. And I just celebrate it. I celebrate every day that more people and more people are finding out about this. So you'll get there. I think it's going to take a few more minutes, but I mean...
@joann_marieYou're there. And I'm just so, so grateful that I met you and that I met Truth and that I met all of you guys. And seriously, I'm grateful for this every single day. And I really wish that I could just scream on top of a mountain and everyone could just hear you guys because it's so inspiring and so positive. And it's just...
@joann_marieBeautiful. So I'm just really happy and congratulations for each and every one of the ones that you've gotten. Like, even if it's one or two or 100,000, I'm just really, really proud of you, Ian. So thank you so much for everything you do. for all the inspiration and all the knowledge and like all the ratios. I never know how to say that word, but it's just amazing.
@joann_marieAnd so thank you. Thank you. And each and every one of you, it's a collective movement. So I'm just so grateful for all of you guys. And please repost this space. Follow me and obviously the man of the hour, the one and only. And if you guys go to it, I will also repost that. And thank you. Thank you so much for being here and for everything that you're doing.
@joann_marieShould we go to Jeff Epstein, the one and only greatest blackmailer in the world?
Speaker 2Yes. Hi, guys.
@joann_marieNice to meet you.
Speaker 2Yeah, I'm from Norway, so I don't speak American, but I can speak English. I hope you understand. So hi. Hi, I'm Malcolm. And hi, Jo and Mari, and hi, everybody else. Can you hear me?
@joann_marieDid he cut off?
Speaker 2Can you hear me, guys?
@joann_marieYeah, you're back. I don't know if it's me.
Speaker 2Okay. No, I just was wondering, like, how much power the Jews have left to unleash on keeping the control going on. That's what I was thinking lately. Like, is this everything they can do, or can they actually achieve much more in terms of control and shaping stuff, narratives, and so on? You know, like, I keep thinking that they might have some, like, plan B all the time.
Speaker 2Some, like... last weapons. Yeah, it's the Samson option.
Speaker 3They just nuke everybody.
Speaker 2Yeah, no, but before that, I'm not talking about auto-destruction, but I'm talking about something else that if they have one of their last options to save their face in front of the world, if everybody's going to find out and like... they might be very much at risk in the u.s if they have like a last blackmail option or something even much bigger that's what i'm thinking you know i don't even know if they really unleashed totally their power that's what i'm a little bit scared of so what do you think yeah malcolm yeah i think i think it's entirely possible i mean the the
Ian MalcolmThe challenge that we really face is that this machine is so accustomed to being able to do whatever and whenever it needs to do that, whatever we discussed, right? And so I have a lot of concerns about that. And maybe the biggest piece is that at the end of the day, we recognize that this group is capable, prospectively doing a whole lot of very nefarious things.
Ian MalcolmAnd so knowing that that's the case, I suppose we have to come to acceptance that there will be, let's say, challenges and pain in the process of fixing things, right? It's kind of like when you go to the gym, it's not going to be easy and overnight you're just going to go from unhealthy to healthy. And I think our society, unfortunately, is going to have to go through that same reality.
Ian MalcolmBut the challenges there, they might be some growing pains along the way, but ultimately, I think if we think of it economically, spiritually, or culturally, it's... inevitably worth the investment. Because what we can't do is continue on the path that we're clearly on. Because if we do, then we just go to hell anyway, right?
Ian MalcolmMight as well just go down, I suppose, with some kind of investment in an opposition to the machine rather than just accepting that things are going to be painful, so therefore we should just put up with whatever they're going to throw at us, you know?
Speaker 2Yeah, of course. Yeah, of course. But...
Speaker 2The problem is that we are infested by them everywhere. So even in Norway, they have very big top position everywhere. So it's like even inside the government, they are a little bit everywhere, just that they cannot be so outspoken as they do in the US, in Europe. But they are a little bit everywhere. And yeah. So the change has to come from the U.S. first, because that's the U.S. kind of drives the rest.
Speaker 2I think so.
Ian MalcolmNo, that's exactly correct. And the reality is that free speech in the West is the most difficult to suppress, just because it's codified in the founding documents of the American idealism, right? And so it's ironic because it presents the biggest... obstacle, which for what it's worth is why I think they've gone about this the way that they have, where rather than tackling that head on, what they're trying to do is to both simultaneously pass for more and more stringent hate speech laws as they use the tech companies to advance the ball in advance of that hate speech, quote unquote, legal approach, right?
Speaker 2Yeah. Norway has one of the biggest oil funds. I think it's one of the biggest actually in the world. And it actually is investing billions of dollars in Israel. And since the genocide in Gaza took place, they tried to take it out. But the U.S. has threatened Norway, saying that there will be consequences.
Speaker 4Just like they're doing to the ICC. They will have done that.
Speaker 2That's why I'm saying that Europe cannot do nothing against Israel because the US is kind of threatening us on behalf of Israel.
Speaker 4Donald Trump will be like, oh no, you guys are all wrong. It's fucking crazy. I'm done with them at this point. It's bullshit.
Speaker 2But I still think, Malcolm, that the Vatican is also behind a little bit of everything with Israel. I kind of think they have some kind of agreements, the Vatican.
Ian MalcolmYeah.
Speaker 2I think they are all into this.
Ian MalcolmDefinitely. It's Christianity that is self-sabotaging. It's committing cultural seppuku in the name of itself, or such would be the claim. And look, that doesn't go to say that there aren't – subverted groups within any and every element of all of these power structures, right? But rather, I just find it such a wild suggestion that at the end of the day, all the roads lead back to the Vatican, which is, because the claim is one of two.
Ian MalcolmIt's either that the Vatican is then demonstrably anti-Christian presently, in which case it's been subverted, or that it was anti-Christian from the origin.
Speaker 2The Vatican has been subverted. The Vatican has been subverted. Pedophilia has taken over, for example, and so much corruption and it's crazy. So that's why I'm saying if Israel doesn't have any kind of mercy towards politicians or towards big people when they blackmail them, imagine what they have on priests. big people inside the Vatican in terms of corruption, pedophilia, and so much going on.
Ian MalcolmSo the question would then be who has that subversion on the Vatican? Because you just said they have subversion. They have blackmail.
Speaker 2Who is the they? From the beginning of the times.
Ian MalcolmSo who is the they?
Speaker 2Some people will call the devil. I don't call it the devil because it's very generalized. But I would say... as it's wrote in the bible i'm not a big expert on the bible but that i know there are some verses on the bible where it's wrote that like who is preaching like religion and and whatever in the reality it's corrupted like they have been corrupted
Speaker 2And they live in a wealthy way. They have money. They are just preaching, but they're not really doing it. So in a few words, it's the Vatican. The Vatican is one of the richest states in the world, so to say.
Ian MalcolmBut you said it's the Vatican that was subverted and blackmailed. Who is doing the blackmailing and the subversion?
Speaker 2We don't know that, but a lot of things are coming out.
Ian MalcolmWe don't know.
Speaker 2We don't know exactly who is doing that.
@joann_marieWho owns the Holy See, Jeff? Who holds the Holy See in the Vatican?
Speaker 2I'm not sure. You can tell me. I'm not sure.
@joann_marieIt's the Rothschilds.
Speaker 2All right. Jews. All right. You know more than me, guys.
@joann_marieYeah, I will post it in the purple pill for anyone who is questioning this and also so that you can see it, Jeff.
Speaker 2Yeah.
Ian MalcolmAnd again, it doesn't go to say that it's only the group that I tend to point fingers at that are creating problems. There's obviously people who have been... subverted, they're the Shabbos Goy, or perhaps they're married into, which is the case with Jamie Dimon at the top of JP Morgan, right? People will say, he's not Jewish.
Ian MalcolmWell, take a look at who he's married to. And that's the challenge, right? And look, not all via marriage. You could say there's marriage, there's blackmail. We saw Bill Clinton and how perhaps he got wrangled into this whole thing, whether it was through Monica Lewinsky, also Jewish, or Jeffrey Epstein. of course, Jewish, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd so you see how these things play out. And it's not to say that there are not priests or Mormons, right? But to suggest, and this is, I say this in jest, right? But to suggest, for example, that it's the Mormons who are behind all that is nefarious that then made a Broadway musical mocking every aspect of their religious foundation, which was produced, financed,
Ian Malcolmand starred, oh, by the way, Jews that were mocking the Mormon religion, which included a very famous song that says, literally, F you, God, with a bunch of people parading around on stage. It's kind of weird to look at something like that, which was given every accolade that you could give a Broadway show, and to suggest it's those people that are in charge that are making fun of themselves, and that...
Ian MalcolmWith the exception of Mitt Romney, we can't really point to a single person of power or influence in the political world that comes from that group. But it's very easy to do so with the other group that we point fingers at. So I find it so bizarre. And when I ask that one question, which is if it is the Vatican, if it's the Catholic Church, if it's the Mormons, why is everything clearly anti-Christ?
Ian MalcolmAnd I don't mean the anti-Christ when I say that, but it is probably a decent way to personify it.
Speaker 5Yeah.
Ian MalcolmBut I do understand. And look, I don't know the reason why so many people like to suggest those alternative power structures. They're welcome to do so. And until somebody could give me that answer, then I don't know where else to take that debate or argument. The strangest part is a lot of them will say they wanted to diminish and exhaust Christianity because that actually brings it back.
Ian MalcolmThat's the one that I find the funniest. The proof that something is in charge is its own sabotage and suicide. That's so bizarre.
Speaker 2So I was hearing a new video from one of the biggest rabbi in Norway. And I was very... I was not shocked anymore, but yeah. He was saying in an interview that... Norway has to be more homogeneous, more multicultural, and we need to take more immigrants inside from third world countries as well. And, you know, after being reading a lot and after being studying and, you know, now I know it's like you can connect all the dots.
Speaker 2This is their plan. This is their plan. But you will never see, you will never see they, how can I say, they will do this they will talk like this only about Israel, like that they would need a more homogeneous country. They need more immigrants. Like they tend to like create shitholes everywhere outside Israel. I don't know if you understand what I mean, but they're like, they are behind in Norway.
Speaker 2I've checked behind every big NGO that works with immigration and helps immigrants. there are a lot of Jewish organizations behind. So it's not anymore like a conspiracy. It's crazy. It's crazy.
@joann_marieYeah, they do that in every single country in the world. And they have even written a lot of books about this, how they want to create a melting pot in... in all of the nations, but not in Israel. In Israel, it needs to be just Jews. So it's pretty crazy. But it was really nice to meet you. And we have a couple of hands, and Ian wants to go to the space.
@joann_marieThank you, guys.
Speaker 2I have to go as well.
@joann_marieThank you so much for joining us, Jeff.
Speaker 2I will share the live, guys.
@joann_marieAnd also, please come up more often. I've never heard you. All right, all right.
Speaker 2Yeah, normally I'm busy with Laura Loomer because I like to post about her. So, yeah, whatever.
@joann_marieI love it. I always see your posts and they're hilarious.
Speaker 2Okay, okay.
@joann_marieThank you so much for everything you're doing.
Speaker 2Bye, guys. Bye. Bye.
@joann_marieUncensored, thank you so much for being here. It's been a while. How are you?
Speaker 6Oh, I'm good. I just am very happy to see... I mean, I get it, right? Like we, you know, this whole fall. Oh, can you hear me? Am I bad?
@uncutspeechI can hear you.
Speaker 6Oh, okay. All right. Joanne, might be you. I don't know. But Ian, congrats, I guess, partially, right? Maybe. Oh, Joanne dropped. So I guess it was her. But, you know, it's a joke, right? Are you at 100K? Are you not? I'm sure if you go on some websites, you are. I'm sure if you go on others, you're not. I get how this game works.
Speaker 6It feels like... I go up a couple hundred every day and then the next day I get on and I lost all of those and more, right? So like that's the game here. But either way, congrats. And just for, you know, everyone listening who might be new, when I first got on X, there were two people. Let me get Joanne back up here. There were two people that helped me out right off the bat.
Speaker 6And that was GNN and a guy, a legend that Ian Malcolm knows of, Bullseye. And then after that, it was Ian Malcolm helping me every step of the way. And if you want to know what you should and shouldn't do on X, how to keep your account safe, how to not get banned, how to not lose everything that you've worked for, listen to Ian.
Speaker 6Just do what Ian says. It really is that simple. Just whatever Ian Malcolm suggests, just do that. Just don't dick around because every time that I've been like, eh, I'm sure it's fine. I know Ian said don't do that, but I'm going to do it anyways. I've had six-month bans. I've lost my account for, yeah, I think eight months, actually, is how long I lost my account.
Speaker 6And it was just something that if I would have just listened to Ian, wouldn't have happened, right? So congrats, Ian. Obviously, well worth the work. And love you a long time, my friend. Great to hang out with all y'all again a little bit, you know? Been a minute.
Speaker 7Hey, Ian, can I talk now?
@uncutspeechYeah, in a second, I want to say congratulations to Ian as well, just real quick. You know, Ian, dude, you're the fucking best. You know, I don't want to glaze you too much, but I do want to say thank you for what you did with JQR at the start and everything. Without Ian, like, JQR wouldn't have been shit. I mean, we might have been something, but it wouldn't have been anything special, probably.
@uncutspeechIan, like, turbocharged us at the beginning because Ian was a friend of ours and... you know, he's a good guy and he saw that we were doing a good thing. And with all of him, dude, I mean, shit, I don't know where we would have, we probably wouldn't have done anything close to what we did do. But because of Ian always being there, we had listeners at the beginning all the way to the end, basically.
@uncutspeechAnd, you know, that was, you know, like I said, without Ian, who knows what would have happened. So thanks for that, bro. And also, like Uncensored just said, for all the personal help too, dude, you know, the advice that Ian has given in group chats. And, you know, how to navigate this work or this, you know, how to make this thing work on X, right, without getting banned and without getting too limited.
@uncutspeechAnd even then you can see, right, like, look at his pinned tweet, you know. So even the best still gets, you know, when you're spreading a good message, you know, what is it when you're over the target or whatever. But nonetheless, congratulations on 99K or 100K or whatever.
@joann_marieIt's 6 million.
Speaker 8Ian, Ian, can you hear me?
Ian MalcolmCan you hear me? Don't you have a fucking camera in your way? No, no, no, he's not going to, but that's totally fine. Let's completely pivot.
Speaker 9So I can't talk? So you're too afraid to debate?
Ian MalcolmOh, my God. No, no, no. You know what? You know what's going to be great? I'm going to allow that. I'm probably going to embarrass you just like I did the last time that you came into a space. But before I do, just like Ace Ventura in the second movie, I think it's called When Nature Calls. As he says at the bottom of the staircase after taking his slinky all the way down, let's do everything the way that you want to do it.
Ian MalcolmYou literally came in here as soon as you were given a mic. Can I talk now? The moment somebody stopped for a moment. Can I speak now? And then the moment Colin and Uncensored, the moment they, can I talk? I want to talk. Why is that the case? Why can you not conduct yourself just like an adult? Is this perhaps the schizophrenia, the narcissism, the paranoia that I speak of all the time?
Ian MalcolmCan you not demonstrate it for everybody because all it does is actually further prove my points? And I'm the one that's trying not to just make everybody that comes from a certain collective look bad. You're doing that yourself. But yes, let's go straight to you. You can share whatever you want, and then we can talk about that.
Ian MalcolmWe'll spend all of the time that you would like for a whole three or four minutes, and then we'll move on to the next speaker.
Speaker 10Pinata time!
Speaker 7Okay, thank you. First off, I wanted to mention that... There's no money in attacking Mormons. There's no money in attacking Seventh-day Adventists. So that's why you only focus on us Jews. There's no money in anyone else.
Ian MalcolmHang on. You think you can make money by talking about the JQ?
Speaker 9Are you going to make money talking about the JQ?
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no. You're going to try and answer a direct question. Can you show me an account that is heavily monetized that talks about this subject? Give me an example.
@joann_marieGo ahead, kids.
Speaker 8To the next point, I wanted to get on to... No, not the next point!
Speaker 6No, not the next point! Just shit thrown at the wall here.
Ian MalcolmOh, no, you talk about that because it's monetized so easily. And tell it to Myron Gaines or Nick Fuentes who has kicked off every platform on the sun. Okay, again, can you give me an example of somebody that is heavily monetized that talks about this subject, yes or no?
Speaker 9Well, you know, Dave Smith, all of these people, they make, I mean, they have...
Ian MalcolmWait a second, wait a second, wait a second. Literally the person that you bring up is a Jew? Is that what we just heard? Can you give me a non-Jew who talks about this subject?
Speaker 11I'm crying.
@uncutspeechThe Dave Smith example was crazy. I mean, nothing better than that.
Speaker 6Yeah, like some regular kosher anti-Semitism, right? Like kosher.
Ian MalcolmYes, yes. Are you still, is it like the blue screen of death here from Microsoft or the Xbox? Can you give us an example?
Speaker 9Did you move to me when I mentioned Candace Owens?
Ian MalcolmYou talked about, okay, so you think Candace Owens is heavily monetized in talking about this subject. Was Candace Owens fired from the Daily Wire for talking about this issue?
Speaker 9Yes, yes, he was.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so Candace Owens was fired from the Daily Wire, but is heavily monetized while talking about it. That's right? Is that your point?
Speaker 7She's an independent creative, you could say.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so she was fired. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. So she was fired from her literal news outlet that she was making millions of dollars with. and then went to something where she has to take donations and get a whole new set of investors because she talks about this subject. But that's her example.
Speaker 9She probably makes money hand over fast. She wouldn't pay the bills otherwise.
Ian MalcolmAm I in any way monetized, Yitz?
Speaker 9I have no idea. I don't know. The answer is no.
Ian MalcolmI have not received a single dime for anything I've done here. I'm not sponsored by anybody. I'm not paid by anybody. I could not get monetized if I wanted to. And if I did, I'd have to provide my banking information, at which point I'd only get further interrogated by Mossad. Now, we could talk to Myron Gaines. We could talk to Lucas Gage.
Ian MalcolmWe could talk to Nick Fuentes, who's been thrown off of literally every payment processor that's out there. He's now on Rumble because it's the only thing that will allow him to talk about this issue. You two have even brought him back for a whopping 24 hours before removing him. How can you suggest that this is a subject that you can talk about openly and get monetized while people like David Icke and Alex Jones talk endlessly about the lizard people, the globalists, the technocrats, the Mormons?
Ian Malcolmand other individuals while being monetized across all the platforms that I could never get monetized on.
@uncutspeechYou know, Ian, even for JQR, we had $2,000 worth of donations saved up in the coffee, and that got banned, and all those donations taken away from us. We never got it. And that was just us, little guys, you know, at JQR's time, and all of that money was just gone. So it's not even the guys at the top. It's little fellas like you and me as well.
@uncutspeechIf you try to make some money, they'll strip it from you.
Ian MalcolmSo Yitz, I know that you wanted to just go moving on to the next issue. How do you respond to something like what was just shared?
Speaker 7What about that? I don't even know that organization.
Ian MalcolmTheir radio outlet on Buy Me a Coffee had $2,000, which for some people, hey, that's a pretty significant amount of money. That that was just taken, removed. They never had a chance to get that all because they talk about Jewish supremacy.
Speaker 9Well, that's if you buy his stick, his story. We don't know.
Ian MalcolmYou think you're accusing him of lying. Is that right? I don't know. You just said if you buy his stick, the opposite of quote-unquote buying it is lying.
Speaker 6This argument goes against my narrative, boy. This won't work.
Ian MalcolmDo you understand that if you buy his narrative that you're accusing him indirectly of lying?
Speaker 7Listen, he's lying. He's not lying. I don't know. I don't care. No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmBut you just said if you buy his stick. So I said, okay, then you're accusing him of lying. And then you refuse to address that, which is a yes or no question. The only alternative to he's telling the truth is he's lying. And then when I asked you about lying, well, it depends on how you define lying. Why does this happen?
Speaker 9No, I didn't say that.
@joann_marieStop with that guy's lying.
Ian MalcolmSo, yes, okay. Let's pretend that you made a decent point around monetization, which you didn't. You said moving on to your next point. What's the next one that you wanted to bring to the surface?
Speaker 7Okay, thank you. Okay, so here's the next point I wanted to mention. And that is the little debate that we had on X through the comments, which you never seem to respond to. Maybe you can respond now.
Ian MalcolmAm I responding to you right now, Yitz? How do you think you're doing in this one?
Speaker 7Well, look, just hear the question. So the question is, if Israel, or if we do, if we're so interested in flooding the West, flooding Europe... North America, who has anti-Semitic migrants. How does that help Israel? And you wrote, oh, it weakens the West. It will make it easier. Anti-Semitic migrants.
Ian MalcolmDoes it not weaken the West, Yitz? If you bring in massive amounts of Muslims. Are we going to have a serious conversation? Pause, pause, pause, pause. Yitz, isn't that the very argument that Ben Shapiro and everybody else at The Daily Wire is presently making about the destabilization of the West?
@joann_marieThat won't do it.
Speaker 4This guy's not on your level, Ian. I wouldn't even give him the time of day.
Ian MalcolmNo, he thinks he is, which is the remarkable piece. It's unbridled hubris. It's the chutzpah on full display. So everybody knows exactly what I talk about when I refer to Jewish supremacy.
Speaker 9Look, I have a good idea. I have a good idea, Ian. I don't think you do, but you're welcome to try and share. If your arguments are so good, you don't have to mute me. Don't keep muting me, please. No, but you can't.
Ian MalcolmYou have to address a question. Now, Yitz. No, no, no, not okay so. Yitz. Does Ben Shapiro discuss the damage that's being done by the Muslims in the Western world? Yes or no?
@joann_marieIs he talking?
Ian MalcolmNo, he's not.
@joann_marieNo, it's not. He's not talking. I keep thinking I'm glitching. No, nobody's glitching.
Ian MalcolmAnd as Heidi's speaking, everybody should know that it's not like he's muted or anything. He's just incapable of processing.
Speaker 7No, no, no. No, no, no.
Speaker 9No, no, no. You are loyal. You are an anti-Semitic joke. You muted me. How dare you lie to me?
Speaker 12Anti-Semitic joke? What joke did I make?
Speaker 9You are muting me.
Speaker 12Sorry.
Speaker 9You know what you're doing.
Speaker 12No, I don't know what I'm doing. I'm recording this right now. I'm recording it.
Speaker 8So if you mute me again. If you mute me again.
Ian MalcolmIf I mute you again, what, Yitz? Are you going to go cry about it on a post? Yeah, you'll record a space. It's not recording a mute.
Speaker 7Mines will. So here's the answer to your question. And please, if you mute me again. What are you going to do? What are you going to do?
Ian MalcolmAre you going to try and desperately come back up on stage?
Speaker 7Your followers are actually bots anyway. They're all bots. Oh, they're all bots?
@uncutspeechAll the 219 people in here for the property space are all bots. Hey, Ian, you need to buy like 200 bots and get yourself a bot.
Speaker 7Maybe if I go get some bots in there, I will have a bunch of bigger spaces. To answer your question, Ben Shapiro talks about migrants all the time. Yes, he does.
Ian MalcolmDoes he talk about them being damaging to the West, Yitz?
Speaker 7Yes, and Israel.
Ian MalcolmYes, he does. Okay, so is it fair for Peter to suggest that bringing in migrants is going to undermine the West? Because, oh, I don't know, Ben Shapiro tells you that that's an okay position to hold?
Speaker 7And, and, no, he does not say it's okay. It's also going to undermine Israel.
Ian MalcolmWait, he does not say it's okay? Wait, wait, wait. Does Ben Shapiro say that the massive influx of migrants is detrimental to the West? You just admitted he did.
Speaker 7He says it's bad. He says it's bad.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so if it's bad, if it's bad, is it undermining the West? Yes or no, Yitz?
Speaker 7Yes, and it's also undermining Israel as well.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so if it's undermining the West, why would they bring them in? And then I respond to you by suggesting that it's undermining the West and destabilizing it so it can't oppose Jewish supremacy. You're saying that that's an incorrect statement.
Speaker 7Yes, yes, yes, but I wrote a counter response. Okay, what is the counter response?
Ian MalcolmLet's hear it.
Speaker 9Okay, you never responded to it. How would we hear it right now? I don't think you probably deserve a response, but you're welcome to try.
Speaker 7Here it is. Undermining the West means bringing more jihadists into the West. who hate Israel. So it undermines Israeli security. It is stupid. Why would we?
Ian MalcolmLet me ask you a question. Do you think Bing Bong or the other migrants that come in that destabilize the West, do you think they have any power or authority to reject Jewish supremacy or Israel?
Speaker 9Are you kidding me? Look what happened in Sydney, Australia.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so you're saying violent attacks on Jews, how is that going to destabilize the strength of Israel? Yes, yes, no. Because the last time I looked, Australia was allowing literally Mossad to come in and do their investigation while also authorizing Israeli intelligence to get connected and plugged into all sorts of Australian databases.
Ian MalcolmWhile politicians in Australia suggested that you needed anti-Semitism laws, that prospectively you needed to get rid of gun ownership in Australia. Whose power is that strengthening? Is it bing-bong in the migrants or is it literally Jewish supremacy in Israel?
Speaker 7Okay, let me put it like this. Anti-Semitic jihadists enter Australia. They vote for the recognition of Palestine. So once again, how does that help Israel?
Ian MalcolmYou think that the desired vote is going to do anything to oppose Jewish supremacy and the influences of Israel? That's your position.
Speaker 9Well, we'll see. I hope you like it.
Ian MalcolmNo, I don't think we're going to see because how's that working out in the United States, Yitz?
Speaker 7What do you mean? Explain.
Ian MalcolmHow are individuals voting... Because last I checked, it didn't matter if they voted for Kamala or for Donald Trump. They were going to get ultra-Zionism and Jewish supremacy either way.
Speaker 9So what difference does the vote make? Okay, so I'll tell you.
Speaker 7This is where it gets really interesting.
Ian MalcolmYeah, tell me. Who was the candidate that was going to oppose Jewish supremacy in the United States?
Speaker 7Kamala Harris.
Ian MalcolmYou think Kamala Harris is married to a Jew? Are you retarded?
Speaker 7That doesn't matter. That doesn't matter.
Ian MalcolmDid she almost elect Shapiro as her vice president from Pennsylvania?
Speaker 7No, no, she did not.
Speaker 9No, she didn't. You don't think? Yeah, yeah.
Ian MalcolmBut did she almost pick Shapiro? Yes or no? Yes.
Speaker 9It probably was never going to happen.
Ian MalcolmWas Shapiro on the docket for a hot little minute there? Yes or no?
Speaker 8Answer the question. Okay, so wait a second.
Ian MalcolmThe woman who was married to a Jew who almost picked a vice president who's a Jew, that was the opposition of Jewish supremacy where Jews are 2% of the United States, right?
Speaker 7Look, look, look, look, I don't know if everyone lives under like a rock here or something.
Speaker 9Yeah, who lives under a rock?
Ian MalcolmBut here's the deal. Since it was Kamala Harris and the Democrats, who makes up over 50% of all donations to the DNC? What ethnic group? Do you want to take a guess?
Speaker 9Yeah, listen, I know the Jews, but look. No, it's the Jews.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so we'll go back to the mute mode again. So the options were Trump or Kamala married to a Jew who almost elected a vice president who's a Jew. who runs for the DNC, which gets over 50% of all donations from a group that makes up 2% of the United States. There's the options, folks. Be really concerned because if Bing Bong comes into the United States, he's going to do all kinds of things that are going to undermine American security and undermine the relationship with Israel.
Ian MalcolmWe're not going to get more subservience to, oh, I don't know, Netanyahu, where Lindsey Graham was there yesterday. The day before that, it was Marco Rubio. The day before that, Donald Trump. The day before that, Jared Kushner. The day before that, on and on and on and on. All of the subservience of this group of people where 65% of them vote for literal genocide.
Ian MalcolmThat's what the United States is subservient to. But trust us. Trust us, bro. It was definitely going to be anti-Israel if it was Kamala Harris in office who, oh, I don't know, was the vice president for Joe Biden whose cabinet was 66% Jews.
Speaker 7Okay, okay. So fine, Ian. You got it. Fine. You want to think that your side can't be monetized and that your side is weak? It literally can't be monetized. You just had a person suggest that their $2,000 were taken.
Speaker 9Hey! Hey, have it your way. Hey, I'm happy. My side is winning. My side is winning.
Ian MalcolmFine. It is that way. If you want to believe that, believe it. What do you mean if I want to believe that? He literally just walked through how his $2,000 buy me a coffee because he can't even get monetized through X was stolen from that organization.
Speaker 9If you want to believe that it's helpless and that we are successful.
Ian MalcolmI don't know if it's helpless. Talk about gaslighting. The reason that you're in here is because it's not helpless. You know why? Because you find out about these spaces because we're making a difference. Because we're growing. Because we're building audiences. Because we're building awareness. Which is why Leonardo Joni is going to have a space that's going to open momentarily with a candidate who is openly anti-Jewish supremacy.
Ian MalcolmThat's what you're building. And yet the irony is that you come in here in an attempt to try and undermine the very thing that we talk about in these spaces. And what do you do? You perfectly demonstrate that you have no reasonable arguments, no rational arguments. You wanted to suggest, oh, you got monetized to talk about this subject.
Ian MalcolmAnd a person literally on this panel says, actually, no, we can't. We tried to do that. It doesn't work. You then tried to suggest, oh, Jewish supremacy is going to get voted against if Kamala Harris gets in office after working with Biden, whose entire administration was essentially Jews. All the way up to Tony Blinken, who, oh, I don't know, is family friends with Robert Maxwell.
Ian MalcolmWeird. Mayorkas?
Speaker 6Weird Mayorkas?
Ian MalcolmYeah, Mayorkas. And Yellen. Oh, and Levine, the transgendered secretary of health. Yeah, that's a crazy one. The fat, obese, overweight trans person who 40 years ago would have been in a mental institution. That is the secretary of health. Also a Jew. Weird. But trust us, guys, it's the Mormons. They're the ones that are in charge.
Ian MalcolmIt's the Mormons who literally ban things like caffeine in their religion. Caffeine! I shouldn't say that. I think it's coffee, actually. It's referred to as warm drinks that are caffeinated. So you can have soda, but you can't have coffee or tea. Coffee or tea. Those are the people that are clearly pushing the degeneracy of the Western world.
Ian MalcolmIt's absolutely them. So let's go. Is Yitz still here? Yitz, can you explain how Bing Bong is really making a big dent in Jewish supremacy by coming to the West and further diminishing the ability for people to collectivize together?
Speaker 6Donnie, and he's got to get his Hezbollah.
Ian MalcolmCan you please explain to me how does Bing Bong and the other third world migrants coming into the West, how do they strengthen the ability for the Western world to oppose Jewish supremacy?
Speaker 9Well, they don't strengthen the West. They don't strengthen Israel either.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so by your own statement in that they don't strengthen the West and therefore would make it more difficult to oppose tyranny and totalitarianism, you've actually made my very argument.
Speaker 7I oppose unfettered migration as well.
Ian MalcolmOkay, who opened the borders for unfettered migration under the Biden administration?
Speaker 7Kamala Harris, who you said is an anti-Zionist. And you claim Donald Trump is bought and paid. No, I don't claim that he is.
Ian MalcolmHe is bought and paid by Miriam Adelson, who he said is his biggest, most important donor, who's a Jew.
Speaker 7Now look, I also want to make the point. You went on and on and you said that Biden was a big friend of Israel. Biden was not a friend of Israel. Biden was not a friend of Israel?
Speaker 9You second-guessed every Israeli decision.
Ian MalcolmWho was Biden's Secretary of State? Can you answer the question?
Speaker 9Yeah, yeah. Everything against Israel. It's ridiculous. Can you answer the question? Is Tony Blinken Jewish?
Ian MalcolmYes. Is Tony Blinken family friends through his father, Samuel Pizarro, with Robert Maxwell?
Speaker 8That I don't know.
Ian MalcolmOkay, I want you to go right now. Right now. Stop, Mietz. I'm going to mute you. I want you to go right now onto Wikipedia. Look up Samuel Pizarro. You can easily find him by going to Tony Blinken's Wikipedia page. That is his stepfather. Now, I want you to hit Control-F, and I want you to search for Maxwell. And on Samuel Pizarro, the stepfather of Tony Blinken, I want you to find where it says longtime friend and lawyer to Robert Maxwell, whose daughter ran Epstein Island.
Speaker 6That is his stepfather. Blinken's uncle. I believe it's Blinken's uncle sat on the first Zionist council as well. Maybe it's his uncle.
Ian MalcolmAnd Blinken's wife, Evan Ryans. if I'm not mistaken, grandfather, was the head of the Secret Service when John F. Kennedy was killed. Isn't that weird, Yitz? What a small world.
Speaker 9So, Ian, let me get this straight. Apparently, we control the world.
Speaker 7We control the media, Hollywood, everything.
Ian MalcolmWe're going to go through each one of these, Yitz. Do Jews control the media in the West? Yes or no?
Speaker 7Apparently, we control everything. No, not apparently. Yes or no?
Ian MalcolmNope, nope, nope, nope, nope. Not apparently. Do they? Yes or no?
Speaker 9No, no, we don't control the BBC.
Ian MalcolmNo, they don't. Okay, so Yitz, what percentage of the media would Jews have to control to be safe saying the Jews control the media? Give me a percentage.
Speaker 7It's not enough.
Ian MalcolmIt's not? Okay, pause. It's not enough. Can you give me a percentage, Yitz? Is that too difficult of a question? Can you give me a percent?
Speaker 9Okay, okay. We're so stupid, but we control the world.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, you're dodging again. Yitz, I'm going to ask you one more time like an adult. What percent of the media would Jews have to control for it to be reasonable to say that Jews control the media?
Speaker 8Okay, let's say 50, 70%.
Ian Malcolm50, okay, 50. So Yitz, I want you to do something. I want you to do something right now, Yitz. I want you to go to Grok, and I want you to ask it. Say what percent of the media is controlled by Paramount, Skydance, Warner Brothers, Netflix, Apple TV, Amazon Prime, and let's just... Oh, I don't know. We could maybe add in, who do we, we could add in Sony just for fun.
Ian MalcolmWe could also go through Fox, but we don't even have to do that. You know what? Let's throw in Disney because Disney will knock it up to about 75%. Every one of those organizations that I just mentioned is run by a Jew. Every one.
Speaker 7So according to your volition- And yet Hollywood is very anti-Semitic. Hollywood is very anti-Semitic.
Ian MalcolmHollywood is anti-Semitic? Really? Can you give me an example of that?
Speaker 8On Orthodox. can you give me an example? No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmPause, pause, pause. Do you see what just happened here? I want everybody to note this. I asked what percent would have to be controlled. 50%, he said. I then gave off off the top of my head five or six companies, seven companies that easily make up 50% of all media. Do you know how I know this? Because I've played this game with Croc many times.
Ian MalcolmAnd we could go through each one. We could go to Andy Jassy, who runs Amazon, Bob Iger at Disney, and on and on and on and on and on. It's getting easier to do this because apparently Skydance, run by David Ellison, owns almost 30% of it if it acquires Warner Brothers. It already got Paramount. So I will be able to point to one Jew, David Ellison, who owns prospectively as much as a third of all American media.
Ian MalcolmOne guy. And you're going to sit there and say that they don't control it after you told me. that 50% would be enough to suggest that something is owned by a group. So Yitz, I'm going to ask you, do you feel silly at this point?
Speaker 6That's your forum? I bet no. That's my bet. We'll hedge our bets right now. Come on, Yitz, you can do it. Yitz, you don't have to raise your hand.
Ian MalcolmCome on.
Ian MalcolmThis is so unusual. Yitz, you can do it. Come on. Okay, okay, I was muted. No, you weren't muted.
Speaker 9You weren't muted. Isn't that funny? Oh, I recorded it, Ian. You can record it all you want. I'm looking at it right now. I'll be happy to post it.
Speaker 7Oh, no, no, no. Yeah, you can go post it, Yitz, along with the rest of this conversation. I am screen recording. I am screen recording.
Ian MalcolmOkay, you can screen record it and you can share it with Bing Bong and all the other folks. It doesn't matter, Yitz.
Speaker 7I'm going to expose you as just manipulating.
Ian MalcolmYitz, it's a recorded conversation. Do you see in the top left where it says REC? What do you think that stands for?
Speaker 7Okay, yeah, listen.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, do you think it's as recommended? Do you think X pushes our space out to people?
Speaker 9So what was your question? So what was your question again?
Ian MalcolmWhat was my question? Yes, I asked you what percent of the media would have to be owned by a group of people in order to say that they own it. You responded with 50%. I then walked you through a couple companies that are all run at the highest level by Jews that make up, according to Grok, 75%. Now, would you acknowledge that Jews control the media, given that statement?
Speaker 7Then fine. Let's go with it. Okay, so let's go.
Ian MalcolmAll right, so you said the media. What was the next one you wanted to point to?
Speaker 8What else do we have? I guess we could do the banks. We could do the banks.
Ian MalcolmLet's do the banks. You want to do the banks?
Speaker 6That is like a crazy one.
Ian MalcolmDo you want to go to the banks or do you want to dodge that all together and just pretend you didn't say it? You could skip banks, I think.
Speaker 9I don't care. Hey, do whatever floats your boat.
Ian MalcolmWhatever floats your boat. Okay, so let's go to the biggest of all. I like doing this. I like doing this.
Speaker 9Because you made a space a few days ago saying we were stupid and low IQ. But yeah, this debunks everything.
Ian MalcolmIf we control everything, it debunks your entire argument. So go ahead.
Speaker 7Oh, I think I'm debunking the argument. But go ahead.
Ian MalcolmYou think you're debunking my argument? How'd you do on the media one, Yitz?
Speaker 9How did that go for me?
@uncutspeechYitz, how did that go for you?
Speaker 7So like I said, Ian, we're stupid, but we control everything.
Ian MalcolmYitz, does it take you strength?
Ian MalcolmTo stab somebody in the back in a dark alley, does that take strength?
Speaker 7So it's the old anti-Semitic, everything.
Ian MalcolmThat's anti-Semitic asking you a question about stabbing someone is anti-Semitic?
Speaker 9So what's your argument? No, no, no, not so. What's your argument?
Ian MalcolmJust try to stay on task. Yeah, it's try to stay on task. Does it take strength to stab somebody in the back in a dark alley?
Speaker 7I guess theoretically not. So how do we get control?
Ian MalcolmOkay, so theoretically not. So what does that mean about strength relative to, oh, I don't know, stabbing somebody?
Speaker 9Okay, I get your point.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so you concede my point that there's no demonstration of high IQ merely by controlling things because you can do through... No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 7No, no, no, no, no, no.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so let's do this a different way. Let's discuss IQ.
Speaker 7You want to go to IQ? Let's discuss IQ.
Ian MalcolmYes, we can go to IQ. It's not going to go well for you either, but let's just do it this way. We just talked about David Ellison. He owns almost 30% of all U.S. media if he is able to acquire Warner Brothers. They're going back and forth because it's either going to be him or Netflix, which is, oh, I don't know, also founded by a Jew.
Ian MalcolmWeird. But let's just stick on David Ellison for a moment. Do you think that it is high IQ or perhaps nepotism that has put him in charge of almost 30% of all media, given his father, Larry Ellison, is one of the richest men on the planet? and happens to own Oracle and now also TikTok. How do you think David Ellison got to that position of prestige?
Speaker 9So I can unpack it, but I'm going to have to go through some history.
Ian MalcolmReal quickly. You're going to have to go through some history. Do you think it's reasonable to suggest that it might be nepotism that has gotten David Ellison to that position? No, no, no.
Speaker 9If you let me go through the history, you're on the fence. No, I'm going to mute you.
Ian MalcolmI don't have to go through the history to ask you a basic question. Let's make it easier for you. Do you think that Eric Trump or Donald Trump Jr. are in their positions of prestige and status because of their intellect?
@uncutspeechWhen it comes to Ellison, you can see when Oracle made the investment into Skydance. It was a little indie studio before that. We can clearly see. It's not like a question of if. It is a nepotism thing. They got this Oracle invested into Skydance, and then all of a sudden, they got a bunch of contracts from these big studios, and they started making movie franchises like Mission Impossible.
Speaker 6Actually, I don't know which to point out. The thing I wanted to point out, though, on that, Colin... was that, do y'all remember how Netanyahu had said, oh, we got TikTok. Who's we? Why is there a we in that statement? An American, an American Jewish man buys TikTok and Netanyahu from, you, of course, the Jew can speak to to me.
Speaker 6That's crazy to me. It's always happening. But so just keep that we in mind. That's so strange to me that they would say that. It's a collective that they'll admit like haphazardly, right? But they won't, they won't admit it in any way that matters for these types of arguments, but we can point to it and we can say, okay, that's strange, but we can't do anything with it.
Speaker 6Cause then you'll sit here and say, oh no, well, it's not like that. Well, I mean, do I trust you Yids or do I trust Netanyahu? Which one? Who should I trust here?
Speaker 7Okay. The IQ of Ashkenazim was raised due to evolutionary factors, like isolation.
Speaker 6Like European admiralism.
Speaker 7Actually, that did actually help boost our IQ.
Ian MalcolmWait, you think it boosted IQ? Inbreeding? Yes. Do you know that inbreeding is banned in most societies? And in fact, even in Israel, they now do genetic testing to try and minimize inbreeding.
Speaker 7Okay, okay, okay. I misspoke. Yes, you did misspeak.
Ian MalcolmPretty embarrassingly. You had a large enough population.
Speaker 9You had a large enough population. So let me go through it real quick. So I started about a thousand years ago.
Speaker 6Did we win the banks? Did we win that one? Is that on our calendar? Did you concede the banks after conceding the media?
Speaker 7Yeah, fine, whatever. I conceded the banks.
Ian MalcolmSo instead of going down the Ashkenazi bottleneck, which I've already talked about at large in other spaces. Okay, so we got the media. You conceded the banks. Would you like to go to politics, perhaps? Or maybe Hollywood? Or do you want to go to tech?
Speaker 8Do you want to go to AI? I concede everything. You concede everything? Okay, wonderful. I want to make my point. I want to make my point.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, but you've conceded everything. So I've therefore won the conversation.
Speaker 9It doesn't matter.
Ian MalcolmWhy does it not matter?
Speaker 9Let me explain and you'll see why it doesn't matter. No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmExplain to me why it doesn't matter.
Speaker 9Because it doesn't do what you hope it does. It doesn't actually prove your argument.
Ian MalcolmIt doesn't do what I want it to do. Define that. There's a lot of abstract.
Speaker 9You want to claim that everything is because of nepotism. I claim it's because of high IQ and merit.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so now you're suggesting that it's high IQ and merit that justify the control that you once denied that now you can see.
Speaker 9I'm not saying it justifies. I'm just saying it just happens to be.
Ian MalcolmWait, no, no. It happens to be. So you're saying it's completely random. Or that it's because of high IQ, but either way you've now conceded the very position that your vision is high.
Speaker 9If you want to say that, you know, if you want to say, quote unquote, we're chosen and God made us. I wouldn't ever suggest that.
Ian MalcolmPhysiognomy would suggest otherwise, in my opinion. God also would say otherwise. Jesus Christ would suggest otherwise for what it's worth.
Speaker 9Well, Jesus was Jewish, so was he ugly?
Ian MalcolmYes, what did Jesus say about Judaism there, Yitz?
Speaker 9Well, you tell me since you're the question.
Ian MalcolmI mean, did he flip all the tables and suggest the synagogue of a certain certain that I can't finish the statement of because, oh, I don't know, Jews might control X?
Speaker 9Actually, many people have finished that statement on X and they seem to be doing fine. Are they Jews?
@joann_marieYou can't. I literally got banned.
Ian MalcolmI'm sure you want me to do that and then when I get nuked tomorrow, he'll just be like, oh, that's weird. Doesn't indicate anything, and good thing we don't control everything, even though I acknowledge that we did in the very space Okay, don't say it then.
Speaker 9Whatever, don't say it.
Ian MalcolmI'm not going to say it, but isn't that weird, Yitz? Why do you think you can't say that on Facebook or Instagram or TikTok? No, no, no, not have it my way. Why do you think that's the case, Yitz?
Speaker 7I see it all the time.
Ian MalcolmI mean, you might see it all the time, but I can show you countless accounts that have gotten nuked over that very comment. Why do you think that is?
Speaker 7Okay, so here's what we can do. You can later on, you can send me a list of all of the accounts. I'll be happy to look at it.
Ian MalcolmNo, I'm sure somebody can put it in a purple pill right now. Actually, I don't know if they can put screenshots because they might get nuked for putting up a screenshot with that phrase on it.
Speaker 7Well, whereas another person can cross out that word, Satan, for example. And, you know, fine, I'll concede, whatever.
Ian MalcolmJust for what it's worth, but you do concede that that comment will get you nuked on this platform and various other social media platforms.
Speaker 7Well, I haven't seen it, but if you claim it does, then it does.
Ian MalcolmIt's not that I'm claiming that it does, it's that I know that it does because I've seen multiple screenshots about it.
Speaker 7Okay.
Ian MalcolmSo would you concede that not only this platform, but all of the other major social media platforms are controlled by Jews?
Speaker 9You want to believe it?
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, not if I want to believe it. Can I walk through and demonstrate how Mark Zuckerberg owns some of them? Larry Ellison just bought TikTok. And the only reason Larry Ellison was able to do that is because the U.S. government came in and said it's a national security threat if it's not owned by Americans, only for NetYahu to go out and say, good thing that we got it.
Ian MalcolmAnd he's literally a foreign leader.
Speaker 7Is there a reason why you're trying to avoid my little statement on IQ?
Ian MalcolmNo, we can go back to your statement. Look, I can happily walk you through IQ and how I think it's a bunch of nonsense. But before we do, because you suggested media, you suggested the banks, you're now conceding also social media. Is that right?
Speaker 9Yeah, whatever.
Ian MalcolmFine. Yeah, whatever. Fine. Okay. And AI, would you concede that as well?
Speaker 7Hey, I hope Israel becomes top in AI. I hope it becomes number one.
Ian MalcolmAre Jews not already at the top of all of the AI platforms yet?
Speaker 7I don't know.
Ian MalcolmYou don't know. Should we walk through Google? Should we walk through Grok? What about the Chinese companies? What about the Chinese companies? You want to go into Deep Ocean and all that kind of stuff? You think that's held by white Europeans? Is that right? Who runs Anthropic?
Speaker 7They're not held by Jews.
Ian MalcolmWho's at the top of Anthropic and Amazon?
Speaker 7I have no idea. Anthropic is a Jew.
Ian MalcolmAmazon is Andy Jassy, also a Jew. We can go through literally all of the Western AI companies that all go through the same group of people. All right, so you can see AI. Okay, so we've got tech. We've got AI. We've got the media. We've got banks that you didn't even want to try and unpack because, well, let's be real. We could go through the politicians.
Ian MalcolmI could go through academia and the Ivy League schools. We could go through literally everything. So before we say anything else, Yitz, is it safe to say that essentially most of all of the Western worlds are controlled by Jews, yes or no?
Speaker 7Fine, I concede.
Ian MalcolmOkay, fine. You concede. Okay, so now what we could do is we could go back to the beginning of the conversation where you said that that was a crazy idea, and now fast forward to saying you concede, yes, I'm correct on that. Is that right?
Speaker 9Whatever, Ian. I want to get to IQ. No, it's not whatever.
Ian MalcolmIt's either a yes or no. Do you concede that I'm correct?
Speaker 9Okay, yeah, yeah. Okay, so you now have conceded.
Ian MalcolmYou, Yitz, have said that I'm correct on my worldview. Thank you for acknowledging such. Now we can go to the next little piece.
Speaker 7Okay, thank you. So here's about IQ. So as it turns out, we were thrown into ghettos for about a thousand years. A thousand years we were thrown into ghettos?
Ian MalcolmThat's the suggestion? A thousand years ago. Where were those ghettos that you were thrown into for thousands of years? Or was it a thousand?
Speaker 7No, no, no. I misspoke again. You did misspeak again. About a thousand years ago.
Ian MalcolmA thousand years ago.
Speaker 7When you had the main prosecution. The main persecution, that was a thousand years ago.
Ian MalcolmIt wasn't a thousand years of ghetto. It was a thousand year persecution that began a thousand years ago.
Speaker 7Are we going to do this? No, we're going to be very specific.
Ian MalcolmI'm not going to let you make generalities, especially those that are patently ridiculous.
Speaker 7A thousand years ago? No, no, no. It was more like 1,900 years of exile in total.
Ian Malcolm1,900 years of exile. Okay. Give me a very broad. So at one point 1,900 years ago, so Christ comes down. Did Christ say, hey, you Jews, go away. Never come back. And then 1,900 years later, you returned. Is that the suggestion?
Speaker 7Well, no. What happened is that the Romans kicked us out in about 70 CE.
Ian MalcolmOkay. Why do you think that happened?
Speaker 7Well, the Talmud says it was a baseless hatred.
Ian MalcolmThe Talmud says it was baseless hatred. Okay, you would suggest that it's baseless hatred that brings me to suggest that the entire modern world is controlled by Jews, but you just conceded that it is.
Speaker 9I'm saying hatred between ourselves.
Ian MalcolmHatred between yourselves. Define that.
Speaker 7Oh, you had all kinds of things. You had the Perusim, the Pharisees, you had the Sadducees, the Sadducees, you had all kinds of things.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so Jews hated one another, which resulted in their expulsion by the Romans. Is that what you're now suggesting?
Speaker 7No, no, no, no. We hated one another. Okay, you hated one another.
Ian MalcolmYou hated one another. Be very specific with your verbiage. You hated one another. Are you referring to other Jews?
Speaker 7Yes, yes.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so Jews hated Jews.
Speaker 7Okay, continue. And then we were fighting.
Ian MalcolmSo you were fighting amongst other Jews because you hated one another.
Speaker 7We fought ourselves in Jerusalem. We bought the food. The food storage was completely wiped out. And then the Romans were able to come in with ease. Conquer, conquer Jerusalem. Okay, so hang on.
Ian MalcolmPause. So what I've heard is that 1,900 years ago, the Romans kicked you out because they hated you, but the reason that they hated you is because Jews were all fighting amongst one another, so much so that they destroyed their own security and sanctity, which was then easily conquered by the Romans, and then you were banished because you were all fighting and squabbling amongst one another, which was really obnoxious, I suppose, to the Romans.
Ian MalcolmIs that right?
Speaker 7Well, of course the Romans wanted to keep Judea under their own control. No, but can you go back?
Ian MalcolmI mean, of course they wanted to keep it. Can you go back to why were they able to so easily do that? Is perhaps there's something wrong with Jewish culture or Jewish genetics that would have resulted in all that? You hating one another thing that you talked about.
Speaker 7If you're going to say that, then you might as well.
Ian MalcolmNo, I'm not saying that. That's what you just said.
Speaker 7No, that was one episode in history. It doesn't mean we're all the same today.
Ian MalcolmIt's just one episode in history, but it is what you just said. Why do you keep saying things that are inaccurate? Why do you keep walking back the very things that you say? Why is it that you keep stating things, and then when I press you on them, you're like, well, that's not what I meant at all. You said for a thousand years we were in ghettos, and I was like, oh, really?
Ian MalcolmAnd you were like, wait, wait, wait, no, no, no. Do you see how ridiculous this is?
Speaker 7Okay, look, we've learned the lesson from baseless hatred.
Ian MalcolmWait, no, no, the baseless hatred, you just defined the hatred amongst yourselves. You just said that Jews hated other Jews. Why did those Jews hate one another?
Speaker 9Definitely, It's like any religion, just different mental groups. No, it's not like any. Fundamentalists.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no, no, no, because I don't see a lot of Englishmen saying we're going to banish all of the other Englishmen. I see people fighting from time to time over religion throughout history. I don't see in-group bias resulting in in-group hatred amongst one another in high-trust societies. You know where I do see that is low-trust societies.
Speaker 9Ian, how would you explain the American Civil War, for instance?
Ian MalcolmThe American Civil War? Well, I could point to Judah Benjamin, who funded the Confederacy. You want to take a wild guess what Judah Benjamin's ethnicity was?
Speaker 7It was the Jews.
Ian MalcolmWell, do you know what Judah Benjamin was? No, no, no, not whatever.
Speaker 7Who was Judah Benjamin? He was not the instigator for the American Civil War.
Ian MalcolmWas Judah Benjamin the financier of the Confederacy?
Speaker 9He was Secretary of State, to be exact.
Ian MalcolmYes, was he the financier of the Confederacy?
Speaker 9I don't know if he financed it. You don't know?
Ian MalcolmOkay, curious. Was Judah Benjamin a Jew? Yes. Okay, was Judah Benjamin a massive slave owner?
Speaker 9Perhaps, but there were plenty of Jews who fought for the North as well.
Ian MalcolmOkay, let's see. We could go through the Monsanto family, which is also Jewish. Do you know what their slave ownership capacity was like?
Speaker 7Okay, the Jews who owned slaves in North America was about 1.25%.
Ian MalcolmAh, you want to go down this rabbit hole? Thank you for walking squarely into my trap, Yitz. I appreciate it. Let me ask you, do you know what city in America had the largest percentage of slave ownership?
Speaker 9You're going to say it was Charleston. It was Charleston.
Ian MalcolmDo you want to take a wild guess what city in America had the largest percentage of Jews?
Speaker 7You're going to say Charleston. No, I'm not going to say.
Ian MalcolmI'm going to state that as fact because that is verifiable fact. These aren't thoughts. They're not ideas. So wait a second. So you're now acknowledging that the financier, the funder of the Confederacy tied to Jefferson Davis was Judah Benjamin, a Jew. You're acknowledging that the city with the highest slave ownership was Charleston, which also had to happen to the most Jews there within.
Ian MalcolmWould you also concede that Jews were drastically overrepresented, not only in slave ownership, but also the slave trade? Yes or no?
Speaker 8No, no. No, you're going to deny that. We're going into tangents.
Speaker 7No, we're not going into tangents.
Ian MalcolmYou are the one that came to this tangent.
Speaker 7Because you know you don't have the facts.
Ian MalcolmPause, pause. How did we get to the Civil War? How did we go off on this tangent?
Ian MalcolmYitz, you can do it. How did we get to the Civil War?
Speaker 7I was muted. I don't recollect.
Ian MalcolmHow do you not recollect? You were the one that started the conversation around the Civil War.
@uncutspeechLike, what the fuck?
Ian MalcolmOkay, well, tell me. Yitz, do you remember being the one that instigated the conversation on the Civil War?
Speaker 7I think I mentioned something. I don't recall every detail.
Ian MalcolmYitz, can I ask you a question? How is it that we keep hearing statements from you that you then have to either retract or walk back or restate?
Speaker 7No, no, I honestly don't recollect how we got to that point. You don't recollect?
Ian MalcolmSo Yitz, hang on, pause, pause, pause. Pause, Yitz. So you wanted to talk about high IQ and debate that, which I said we could do. Do you think your inability to recollect or to remember or to maybe, I don't know, intelligently walk through a debate or discourse, one in which, oh, by the way, you've conceded that the very thing, which is my overarching worldview, which you said was incorrect at the beginning, you then have fully acknowledged is in fact accurate.
Ian MalcolmHow do you think you're doing with that IQ presentation, Yitz?
Speaker 7I'm never saying that I believe you're accurate. I'm doing it to move the conversation. No, no, not to move the conversation.
Ian MalcolmYitz, do you think you're demonstrating a high IQ with this conversation or no?
Speaker 7Listen, there's been so many people like, there's always an intellectual or two who forgets momentarily how they got to a topic.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, Yitz, it's actually not. No, actually recall is one of the big pieces of IQ tests, actually. Yitz, do you want to take a wild guess what part of IQ tests Jews, including Ashkenazi Jews, do rather poorly on?
Speaker 7Spatial, I know that.
Ian MalcolmAh, yes, yes, and reasoning. Is it perhaps odd that you seem to be really struggling with some of these things?
Speaker 7I don't know about reasoning, but let's go through the IQ history now real quick, okay?
Ian MalcolmAh, we can go through the IQ. Which of the IQ tests do you want to refer to?
Speaker 7Well, I'm going through the history.
Speaker 13You're letting him off on the slavery question, which he never addressed. Can you also discuss Aaron Lopez as well, Yitz? Are you familiar with who he was?
Speaker 7I've read that name like once in my life.
Speaker 13What did Aaron... Do you know what his real name was, which he changed? I don't know. It seems to be a common trend with what Jews do. No, no, no, no.
Speaker 7There are plenty of non-Jewish. There are plenty of non-Jewish actors in Hollywood who changed their name. What did...
Speaker 13That's great. Let's try to stay on topic. Okay, so you know who Aaron Lopez was. How many ships did he underwrite? How many ships did he own? I don't know, but it's one person. It was 21.
Speaker 7Okay, that's one person.
Speaker 13So he underwrote 21 slave ships. What was he doing with those slave ships?
Speaker 7Hey, did I ever say we Jews are perfect? Did I ever make that claim?
Speaker 13Why are you getting all defensive? I never said what you said. So are you trying to say that not one knowing you with several goals?
@uncutspeechWell, yes, you did say that we were exaggerating the representation in the slave trade. But you're walking back again, it seems like.
Speaker 13We discussed the Monsanto family. We've now discussed Aaron Lopez, two major slave owners. The exposure is insane.
Speaker 7Yeah, yeah, two names. Keep in perspective. Do you want more?
Speaker 13Two names. How about Moses Cohen? How many names would be enough? Okay, three names. many can you answer this why were the slave auctions never held on jewish holidays but in fact the reason for that being is because almost all of the owners of slaves who were selling and all the buyers of slaves who were buying were jewish so of course they wouldn't want to inconvenience the main profiteers and buyers of slaves on jewish holidays and i have by the way an example of one of the advertisements for these slave auctions are you familiar with that
Speaker 7Okay, listen, we're getting a D-Ware.
Speaker 13Just a simple question. Are you familiar with the advertising for the slave? I'm really breaking it down to baby steps because you claim you don't recall. So your argument is... I'm on your side. I'm on your side here. Hey, it's okay.
Speaker 7I avoid fructose, by the way.
Speaker 7We're responsible for everything.
Speaker 13Do you really want to get into who ran the cotton trade as well as the sugar plantations as well in places like Brazil? Do you really want to go there?
Speaker 7Okay, look. You're obsessed about it.
Speaker 14I'm just a simple guy. I'm trying to figure it out from you to see what you know. I'm trying to learn from you.
Speaker 13You're the superior one here.
Speaker 7I'm not an encyclopedia, my friend.
Speaker 13You're not an encyclopedia.
Speaker 7It's hilarious. I think it's going to be very obvious. It's going to be very obvious.
Speaker 7You kept going on tangents. Everyone's going on tangents.
Speaker 13How did I go off tangent? We were discussing the slave trade, which you claimed Jews weren't involved in. Now we're going. Then you're Aaron Lopez. Then we went through Moses Cohen. We're just going back to Aaron Lopez. Do you know what he did with the proceeds of his slavery?
Speaker 7Do you want me to Wikipedia all the famous non-Jews?
Speaker 13Do you know what he did with the proceeds of his slavery? Okay, what did he do? That he gained three ill-gotten gains. What did he do with his money? He was from Rhode Island. What did he do with his money?
Speaker 7Tell me.
Speaker 13Did he build a church?
Speaker 7You know the history, so tell me.
Speaker 13He built a synagogue in Rhode Island. He built the first synagogue in America before it even had its independence. No, no, no, no, no, no. Why do you say no? Do you want me to give you the exact years?
Speaker 7The first synagogue was built in New Amsterdam, which became New York City.
Speaker 13What year was that? What year was that? This is before America actually became a federation.
Speaker 7It was when New York City was far back enough. What year was it?
Speaker 13If you're going to tell me it was before Aaron Lopez, then you should know the year, right?
Speaker 7Let me look up when the first synagogue was built.
Speaker 13Let me look it up so you don't know the year.
Speaker 7I'm not an encyclopedia.
Speaker 13So you're not an encyclopedia, but you're making definitive claims.
Speaker 7I'm making the claim that you're incorrect, that the first one was built in Rhode Island, probably. It was built by Aaron Lopez, that's correct. And he was able to build that.
Speaker 14What else was Aaron Lopez doing for a living other than leasing out his ships for slave labor?
Speaker 13He'd be able to, of course, buy and sell slaves.
Speaker 13and then using the proceeds of his slavery to build a synagogue and also live a very lavish life.
Speaker 7Okay, before we know it, they're going to be claiming Stonewall Jackson to us. Okay, let's get back to IQ. Thank you for your information.
Speaker 13Whoa, why do you want to change the subject now?
Speaker 7I want to go back.
Speaker 13Are you feeling embarrassed on behalf of your people who enslaved black people, many of whom died, by the way, just on the trek over from Africa into the New World? Are you familiar with that?
Speaker 7The majority of enslavers.
Speaker 13Are you familiar with the fact that many blacks, because you stacked them one on top of the other, subjected them to the most horrific conditions. Many of them starved or they just didn't fit. Actually, you have a guilt complex.
Speaker 7You have a guilt complex and you want to project everything you did.
Speaker 13What are you talking about? I don't know. Let's try to stay on topic here. Why is this a controversial topic for you? You have a guilt complex. Okay, let's try this another way. Why did the Jews kill Alexander II, who was the Tsar of Russia, in 1881? Why did he do that?
Speaker 7Okay, so actually, as I recollect from that tale, there was one Jew... It wasn't a tale.
Speaker 13It was three Jews that killed him. Why did they do that?
Speaker 7Alexander II. I don't believe it was all Jews. There were plenty of non-Jews. There were three Jews that did it. I have the names. I have the post.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Let me explain to you. I have the post. I wrote the post. I even named the three Jews that did it. And it's never been community noticed because it's documented historically. I'll ask you again. Why did three Jews kill Alexander II in 1881 when he'd actually liberated all of the serfs, so-called slaves, who never were slaves, in Russia in 1861, two years before, well, Abraham Lincoln did in 1863?
Speaker 13And are you familiar with the fact that Abraham Lincoln was also killed by, of course, Jean-Baptiste Booth, by Jews as well, because he liberated the slaves. And he himself was Jewish, by the way. Notice the coincidence here. The Jews killed Abraham Lincoln, and they killed Alexander II, the two guys that liberated the slaves or the serfs in the case of Alexander II.
Speaker 13Why do you think they would do that?
Speaker 7You had me on mute again this whole time. You haven't been muted.
Speaker 13Nobody's been muted. You're lying right now. I never muted you. Now you've been muted. I didn't do anything.
Speaker 6Just now I did, but only for one specific reason. If you all look at the title, 100K Thanks Celebration, I just looked. Ian hit 100K just now. Congrats, Ian. Anyways, we can continue on.
Speaker 15Well, Yitz, are you going to wish Ian congratulations?
Speaker 16Are you following Ian at least?
Speaker 3Or are you just free-riding off the stage to try to get followers? W. Ian Malcolm.
Speaker 13Yeah, exactly. Yitz, are you just here free-riding so you can try to get more followers?
@uncutspeechSay congratulations, Yitz.
Speaker 13By the way, give me a few more of those Roman salutes.
Speaker 13There you go.
@uncutspeechYour favorite emperor is Hadrian, isn't it? Or is it Titus? Which one?
Speaker 7Please. This is Childish. I keep being muted. This is ridiculous. This is not a serious conversation. I just used AI and the AI said...
Speaker 13I can feel and sense your crocodile tears right now. Your victimhood is just oozing out of you.
Speaker 7Okay, well, I'm recording the space as well. And if it doesn't pick up on your end... Are you going to send it to the ADL?
Speaker 13Are you going to send it to Adam Milstein? Are you going to send it to Leora Rez? She likes to get people doxed and get them fired. Are you one of those guys? Are you a doxer yet?
Speaker 7No, I don't dox people. I just used AI and I was correct.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. Okay, so you're not that guy. So why do you need to record the space if it's already on record?
Speaker 7Because everyone's claiming that they're not muting me, and I want to have evidence that you are muting me when I don't know it.
@joann_marieIt only tells you that we mute you. No, no, no. I told you outright.
Speaker 7See, once again, we're on a tangent. Once again, we're on a tangent. And we're not getting to the point of discussing. Is Ian still here?
Speaker 13The Jews dominated the Atlantic slave trade. No, no, no. The original discussion was about IQ. Which you still haven't yet gone on. Hold on. I also gave you evidence of the advertisement used for the slave auctions that didn't happen on Jewish holidays because most of the buyers and sellers were Jews. Over 78% of the slave owners in America were Jews.
Speaker 13Less than 2% were white men, white American men. And yet you've got Jews that try to deny this because they like to cosplay or shapeshift as white when they commit crimes. And they're white people. They're not Jewish anymore. But in fact, they are Jewish or they're Sephardic Jew. That's ridiculous. They're Sephardic Jew from Spanish or Portuguese descent.
Speaker 13We tried to be identified as white. Is Moses Cohen ridiculous? Is the Monsanto family ridiculous?
Speaker 7We tried to identify as white and we got one sword were killed by the Nazis.
Speaker 13I'm glad you admit it. We never tried to identify as white. If you're an ethnicity, why did you try to identify as white?
Speaker 7Because after 1,900 years of persecution, we wanted to try to assimilate and try to get out of anti-Semitism.
Speaker 13Wait, 1,900 years of probably... There's an old Russian proverb. We had to shapeshift.
Speaker 7One at a time.
Speaker 13There's this old Russian proverb. Maybe you're familiar. Because more than half the Jewish population, unfortunately, comes from... Oh, did you run away? You ran away. But anyway, the old Russian proverb is, the Jews will always tell you what happened. They'll never tell you why. We were prosecuted, persecuted for 1,900 years.
Speaker 13Well, why not just 3,000 years? Why not 4,000 years while you're at it? We're 6 million years. Okay, he's requesting. We'll bring him back. Ladies and gentlemen, that's such a fun thing. For the record, nobody dropped you. And as soon as you requested, I brought you back up. So you're not being persecuted. Just so you know, don't go kvetching.
Speaker 13Oy vey, they dropped me.
Speaker 16They muted me. It's not fair.
Speaker 13So anyway, do you care to answer the question? So repeat it again? Of course. Well, you made a claim that Jews have been persecuted, prosecuted for 1,900 years. Why not 3,000 years? You were getting kicked out of, well, Egypt, Greece, the Roman Empire, even before those 1,900 years. So let's go back even further. See him on your side.
Speaker 13I'm acknowledging all the suffering you guys... I've been subjected to. Now, Yitz, why do you think you were kicked out of 109 countries 1,034 times?
Speaker 7It wasn't 109 countries, number one.
Speaker 13How many countries was it? If you're going to say it wasn't 109 countries, I'll put it in the jumbo. Sure. If you're going to say it wasn't 109 countries, tell me. How many countries was it?
Speaker 7I don't know, but it was probably less than that. It was high, but it was less.
Speaker 7Because you can look at the list and there's a list of 109. There's a list. And some of them, if I can speak.
Speaker 16Okay, so what countries are on this list?
Speaker 8Okay, so some of them, for example.
Speaker 13Okay, so here's one example. So we can agree there were some countries on the list that Jews were kicked out. Can I speak? Yeah, that's fine. Tell me you can when it's your turn. So here's a question for you. We know the UK is on that list in 1290. The Jews were kicked out of the UK in 1290. One of the reasons was coin clipping, your child sacrifice, and your jewsery.
Speaker 13So those are three of the reasons. So is that the Jews' fault they got kicked out of the UK? Or is it the UK's fault for, well, acknowledging the Jewish crimes and wanting to liberate their people of, of course, the tyranny, the illegal occupation, the Jews who are destroying their economy and their social fabric?
Speaker 7Okay, so actually I'm glad you mentioned...
Speaker 13because it goes into my whole iq spill anyway so that's fine we're not talking about iq we know you're low iq so no one's arguing that i'm saying it goes into it it goes we know you're not high iq because you already claim you don't recollect you don't know or you keep meeting me i would recollect and you would know right so once again i'll ask again
Speaker 13Do you acknowledge the fact the UK had every right to kick out the Jews for charging around 50% per annum on their loans? They got busted for coin clipping. And of course, they were doing child sacrifice, especially during their holidays like Purim and Hanukkah.
Speaker 7Okay, okay, wait. Okay, let's just slow down for a moment.
Speaker 13Purim, Passover, Hanukkah, the three major holidays where Jews like to do child sacrifice. Do you acknowledge that?
Speaker 7Okay, you keep muting me and then I can't talk. You're not muted.
Speaker 13Just answer the question, Yitz. You don't answer any questions, though, Yitz.
Speaker 7I'm going to answer if you please stop muting me.
Speaker 13Come on, Yitz, don't be a ditz.
Speaker 7Number one, number one, there was no child sacrifice. That's a blood libel. Never? There's never any child sacrifice?
Speaker 13We did not use... Yitz, do you want me to play you a video of this lady named Rachel from 1989 where she went on Oprah Winfrey and voluntarily admitted nobody put a gun to her head? that her family, who's Jewish, did commit child sacrifice, and that not only did they do it, but Jewish families all across America did child sacrifice, and they've been doing it for centuries because they actually worship Satan.
Speaker 13Do you want me to play that video for everyone?
Speaker 7No, you don't have to. Okay, here's what I want you to see. Are you sure?
Speaker 13Yes, I've got the recording where Rachel, and you know how she was described? A nice Jewish girl from a nice Jewish family that commits child sacrifice. Okay, so clearly you're the small family. Do you acknowledge that video from 1989? And Oprah Winfrey. No, no, of course not. It was also validated in 1990. So do you want me to play it for you so that I can jog your memory?
Speaker 13Because, hey, I'm on your side. I want you to be able to recollect. Oh, you're on my side. Absolutely. So this way they can reach a stage where they might actually want to show some remorse, show some shame. I'm on your side because I want the Jews to be able to show some remorse, show some shame. There's no point in this conversation if it's going to get silly.
Speaker 7If it's going to be silly, I'll just leave. If it's going to be stupid. Okay.
Speaker 13Like, like, like the argument about, you know, now you get to sacrifice everybody with this intellectual prowess.
Speaker 7this is stupid this is silly we don't we don't know you know what you know what you should do you know you know what you should do mr anonymous whatever your name is anonymous anonymous stay in your lane anonymous stay in your lane there's no it's anonymous
Speaker 16I'm trying to see him on your side. I'm helping you pronounce words. I'm going to leave in two seconds.
Speaker 7I'm going to leave in two seconds. This is ridiculous. Now you're doing ad hominem attacks. Look.
Speaker 13Are you insulting the rabbis that do mitzitzibapah and they're proud of it?
Speaker 7That doesn't go on anymore. You know that doesn't go on. Okay, where's Ian? Yes, it does go on. You're an anti-Semitic jerk. You're an anti-Semitic jerk.
@uncutspeechYou're an anti-Semitic jerk. You're an anti-Semitic jerk. There was a study out of New York City in 2011. There was a study from the National Institute of Health out of New York City in 2011 that showed over 4,000 cases from 2001 to 2011 So like this idea that they don't still do it. Why do you, you don't know anything about your own history.
@uncutspeechYou even said, no, no, no, no. You don't even, you don't even know about your own quote unquote persecution. Remember when you were talking about the expulsion of Jews? by the whenever the second temple got destroyed the romans let you live there in jerusalem for like another hundred years and then you retard yeah yeah yeah you're going to say you're going to say no no i know that then you did another revolt and then hadrian kicked your dumb fuck sorry and that was the big exploit you don't even know about your own so-called persecution you don't know about your own you don't even why are you debating this when you clearly don't even know about your own history here like the basics no i'm aware of boca okay
Speaker 15So then why did you say you guys were expelled from the Second Temple?
Speaker 13Wasn't that a Jewish rebellion against the Roman Empire after they still let you stick around in Jerusalem? Yeah.
@uncutspeechAnd then you said about, you said King Edward, during King Edward's England, that everyone was coin clipping at the time. I caught that too. No, they weren't. The reason why King Edward had to kick them back out after letting them back in was because the Christian populace was very angry that the Jews only were allowed to do this kind of stuff in banking.
@uncutspeechThis was like the main reason. So the populace was very, very angry at Edward, and Edward said, you know what, I think we're going to have to deal with this little situation we've got going on here. He didn't want to kick them out. Edward was more than happy to, you know, work with them.
Speaker 7He wanted to confiscate our wealth. That's what he wanted.
@uncutspeechno he was making money hand over fist with the jews he was fine he was financed by them he was having a good time with his jewish financiers but at the end of the day once the entire kingdom he wanted to confiscate jewish wealth
Speaker 13How did the Jews accumulate that wealth? What was the proceeds? Where are these proceeds derived from? Was it from, say, hard work in the field? Hold on. Was it because you guys were doing, like, construction jobs and building buildings? So as it turns out, what do the Jews do to accumulate all of that wealth?
Speaker 7So this is very interesting. As it turns out, you non-Jews
Speaker 16forced us into selective occupations so hold on when you say they forced you do they put a gun to your head do they say it's either you're gonna yes yes yes or you die yes yes and so they're like okay yes sir yes yes we shall lend that you serious race as part of the 198 mitzvah that commands the jews to charge you serious rates so tell me was usury against the jewish religion yes
Speaker 13Well, then why is it in the 198 mitzvah it says the Jews are commanded to charge you serious rates? Then why do they still do it if it's against the Jewish religion?
Speaker 7No, nobody still does it. Nobody still charges you serious rates.
Speaker 13Is that right? Well, do you at least admit your book says that you should?
Speaker 7No, no, no.
Speaker 13You want me to put it up in the nest on the 198 mitzvah, which comes from the Chabad.org website. That's a Jewish website. Are you calling the rabbis liars again? You know, ADL listens to all of Ian's spaces. You know they're listening to you right now. If you call the rabbis liars, there could be a special place in the hell you don't believe in.
Speaker 13I know it's funny, right? Listen, listen, listen. What are you going to come back as? A billy goat? A cow?
Speaker 7What are you going to be?
Speaker 7Are we going to have a serious conversation? That's where you're coming back. Where's Ian? Is he at the other space?
Speaker 13Ian, he misses you. Do you want to say congratulations to Ian at least?
Speaker 7No, I think it's for a box.
Speaker 13He hasn't reached 6 million followers, but he's on the way.
Speaker 6He's only 171,000 away from the Holocaust. Say again? It's 130,000 for the Jewish number.
Speaker 13270 was everybody. That's a good point.
Speaker 13Hey, Yitz, do you still believe in that six million number? You're not that foolish, right?
Speaker 13Okay. Could be five. It's just a simple question. You can say yes or no. Come on. Do you still think this was a movie based on a true story?
Speaker 7The answer is absolutely 100%. It's six million.
Speaker 13It's not four like they said that one time?
Speaker 7No, no, no.
Speaker 13Okay, so you said yes. Do you know who Raul Hilberg is? That's a simple yes or no. The Polish government said four million.
Speaker 7The Polish government did that because they wanted to try to bump up non-Jewish deaths in Hassoa because they thought, you know, that non-Jews...
Speaker 13I just asked you a simple question. Do you know who Raul Hilberg is? It's a yes or no.
Speaker 7Say again?
Speaker 13Do you know who Raoul Hilberg is? Yes or no?
Speaker 7No.
Speaker 13You don't know who he is? So he's a Holocaust historian, a guy who's written volumes about the Holocaust. Are you aware that during the Ernst Dundell trial in the 1980s in the province of Alberta, Canada, that Doug Christie, who was Ernst Dundell's lawyer, cross-examined Raoul Hilberg under oath for two days? And one of the questions he asked him was about the Holocaust number, and he said it was not $6 million.
Speaker 13Do you know what he said?
Speaker 7No, but you know what? Even if it was five million.
Speaker 13Well, aren't you curious what a Jewish scholar would have said? As one historian once said. So he said it was about five million. Wait a minute. So he said it was five. So it wasn't six. So there's already confusion there. So now you need to go do more. Do you know what else he said when he was asked if there's any scientific evidence?
Speaker 13that there were any gas chambers and that any Jews could have been gassed in any one of these labor camps that weren't really concentration camps. We know that, too. Do you know what he answered?
Speaker 7Okay, I'm going to report you for Holocaust now.
Speaker 13He said, no, it's not Holocaust now if it never happened. And I believe it's Israel and the Jews who denied the Armenian Holocaust, the Russian Holocaust, and the German Holocaust they committed between 1945 and 1948. Do you acknowledge the Jews killed 11 million Germans between 1945 and 1948? And you raped two million other women, too?
Speaker 13Do you acknowledge that, or are you a Holocaust denier?
@uncutspeechLet me guess, you don't know about that yet.
Speaker 13I love the Roman salutes, by the way.
Speaker 7The Soviets came in as they were defeating the Nazis.
Speaker 13Wait a minute, who were the Soviets? Who was leading the Soviets at that time?
Speaker 7Oh, Joseph Stalin. He wasn't Jewish.
Speaker 13Oh, really? Yeah, he was. Why did he speak Yiddish then?
Speaker 7Why did he speak Yiddish with his kids?
Speaker 13Why did he also speak Hebrew? I believe his first wife was Jewish. I have the sources. If he wasn't Jewish, then tell me this. Why did he vote in favor of a Jewish state of Israel at the UN and convince five other countries to do that if he wasn't Jewish?
Speaker 7I'll happily tell you.
Speaker 13I'll add one other question. Why did the Jews in Russia personally thank him and pray to him, pray for him, with their Torah and say that, well, he's basically the king of the Jews because of what he did, which was to help us.
Speaker 7I'll tell you why. Because Israel was semi-socialist. He thought he would gain an ally in the region. That's why.
Speaker 13But his plan was to create it. He created a Jewish oblast in 1934. He wanted the Jews to come there. But then the Jews said, well, no. 100,000 of them actually moved there. They didn't like it because... Yeah, yeah, of course. Do you know why they didn't like the Jewish oblast yet?
Speaker 7It's not our ancestral homeland. How about that?
Speaker 13That's not why. Well, 100,000 of them didn't think so because they didn't move there. Do you know why they didn't like it, though? They never believed in any ancestral homeland because Mordecai Noah also bought another piece of land, 45 acres worth, in Rhode Island. Oh, not Rhode Island, the Grand Island off of Buffalo in 1825.
Speaker 13He was the original Zionist. But do you know why Jews didn't want to move there either? Because the land wasn't developed. No, I'll tell you why. It's because the land wasn't developed and Jews are historically lazy. They never built anything. They never even built that.
Speaker 7Oh, go check out Tel Aviv, my friend.
Speaker 13Hold on. Even this third temple you guys really want, well, nobody wants to build it because you're fucking lazy. You know how to destroy shit and blow shit up, but you don't actually build anything. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? We can look. Hey, we can look. Are you kidding me?
Speaker 7Look at Tel Aviv.
Speaker 13Look at Haifa. Hey, we can look at the work. of Israel Finkelstein. Do you know who he is? He's another Israeli Jewish historian who says that there's zero proof that ancient Israel ever existed because, well, you guys didn't build anything. You have no, like, artifacts. There's zero evidence that you had zero roots. There's no evidence of any ancient Jewish homeland that ever existed because Jews never built anything.
Speaker 13Okay, look, I'm going to make you... Do you know what Jews are actually known for when they build states from the states? You live in ghettos. You don't build any fancy high-rises or even three-story buildings. You live like gypsies. By the way, Hitler also put into war camps because they were lazy, too, like you guys.
Speaker 7He only put those who had not assimilated. Those who had not assimilated, he put you through. Now, here's the deal.
Speaker 13So you admit then that Jews didn't assimilate in Germany, and that's why they were put in labor camps.
Speaker 7I'm talking about the Roma, the gypsies. Now, here's the deal.
Speaker 13They were alongside the Jews, whom they have a lot in common with, in these work camps, right? Wait, hold on. So the Roma, they didn't assimilate, so that was the problem.
@uncutspeechBut Jews, they were put in camps just because they were Jewish and everybody hates them, yeah?
Speaker 7Yeah.
@uncutspeechOkay, all right.
Speaker 7I mean, we were a great scapegoat. We were a great scapegoat.
Speaker 13But if that's the case, then why did they agree to a Havara agreement? Do you know why there was a Havara agreement in 1933?
Speaker 7Yeah, what that was about was... Were you just speaking Hebrew there? What was that? That was about us selling property in Germany so that we can move to Israel. That's all that it was.
Speaker 13Hold on. It wasn't because Judea declared war on Germany and Judea declared an international boycott against Germany? It wasn't because of that?
Speaker 13You kind of left that part out, right? Because that happened first. And then the National Socialists, who had just taken power, responded with, look, we'll compromise for 60,000 of the German Jews, not over half a million that were living there, a small fraction, less than 10%. Look, look, if you're so right, if you're so intellectually... And by the way, why did you say Israel?
Speaker 13There was no Israel in 1933. It was occupied Palestine. Yeah, you tried to rewrite history, huh? It was British mandate, Palestine. So you guys moved into someone else's country illegally. Right? Okay.
Speaker 7So this can be very interesting. Do you believe we, Ashkenazim, or not? Do you believe we're not the real Jews, quote-unquote? Do you think we're like fakes?
Speaker 13I think you guys are descendants of a Turkish tribe that came into what's modern-day Ukraine, and you converted a bunch of, well, Phalic worshippers there who were committing all kinds of Kabbalah. So you know what happened there? King Bulan interviewed an imam, he interviewed a priest, and he interviewed a rabbi. And after learning about the three religions, the one that was most similar parallel to their religion, because they were into worshiping phallic symbols, kind of like what Rabbi Shmuley does when he likes to make his kosher dildos and his kosher butt plugs and all that stuff, because he worships those things too, like your people do.
Speaker 13Now you understand it's not history. Hold on, that's why they picked Judaism, because it was most similar to what they were already practicing. Now you understand that. They were also doing child sacrifice, again, worshiping idols. And, of course, committing all kinds of grievous sins, such as, of course, adultery, fucking around, and, again, molesting young children.
Speaker 13So, like, ah, Judaism is a perfect fit. Okay, it's my turn. So that's why they converted right away. They picked Judaism.
Speaker 7Now you understand that Yehuda HaLevi, you understand that Yehuda HaLevi, who was a great poet, that he wrote this book called Kazawe. And, you know, it's probably one of the greatest books. So, now... If I can respond about the Cazao hypothesis, because it's a bunch of baloney. Number one.
Speaker 13I don't care. You want to go down this Cazarian theory. Do you know who wrote the book? The 13th tribe. That was another Jew. Yeah, he was Jewish. So who cares? Arthur Kessler wrote it. Who gives a fuck? Well, he was incorrect. So a Jew is the one who claims 13th tribe anyway. You just want to go down this rabbit hole because it's something you probably learned recently?
Speaker 13I don't care.
Speaker 7No, no, no, no, no. Why don't we stay on topic? I have the facts.
Speaker 13Why don't we stay on topic? You switched to Ashkenazim because that's what you shapeshifters do. You can't stay on topic.
Speaker 7You want to avoid.
Speaker 13No, you want to avoid the fact. First of all, you want to avoid the fact it wasn't... There was no genetic evidence. No history.
Speaker 7No archaeology. No cultural.
Speaker 13No... You had no archaeology because Israel... Israel Finkelstein said so. He wrote a book. Israel Finkelstein, who's an Israeli Jewish historian and scholar, said that you guys had zero archaeological proof of ever having a homeland in Italy. I don't care what he says.
Speaker 7I don't care what he says.
Speaker 13But he's Jewish. Are you insulting another Jew who's a scholar and a historian? I don't care what he says. What's with all this anti-Semitism from you? This is shameful of you. Can you please stop moving me? I don't think you're going to get your ADL checks if you keep messing around with other Jews.
Speaker 7This is ridiculous. I don't know.
Speaker 13You don't acknowledge the scholarly work of Israel Epstein, who's written numerous books. And there's a million other scholars who disagree with him.
Speaker 7There's a million other scholars who literally disagree with him. So let's go through it real quick. We have Silo. We have Silo. We have Betz Lechem. We have Betz Lechem. Only one person's won awards.
Speaker 13for writing about so-called Israeli archaeology that never existed. Because he claims that despite all, listen, despite all of the deep, profound research that he's done into the topic, he could find zero evidence of any archaeology or any proof that Jews built anything in the ancient land of Palestine that always existed.
Speaker 13So he's an authority on the subject matter. Your other guy that you mentioned and invoked, nobody knows.
Speaker 7Okay, so one person. I mean, you know how silly this sounds? Just throw out one name and say it's gospel. I mean, come on. Look, we have over 20 holy sites in Judea and Samaria alone. Over 20.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. Isn't, for instance, the Rebbe in authority on Judaism? Yes or no?
Speaker 7Of course he is.
Speaker 13Then you guys are used to... Hold on. Then you've already set the precedent. The Jews do use one figure of authority when it comes to discussing certain subjects. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Oh, now it's no, no, no, no, no. When it comes to religion, you have one subject matter of authority. I am not above. He is not my...
Speaker 13He's wrong?
Speaker 7He's not my... Listen, listen. Menachem Mendelssohn, you know... Beautiful, wonderful. May his memory be a blessing.
Speaker 13A great rabbi. Is that why the rabbis like to sacrifice young babies in the tunnels, do incisions and rabbinical prayers, Talmudic prayers, to pray to try to revive his spirit in these tunnels so he comes back to life because he's loved, beloved so much and he's considered the lost Messiah? I'm just wondering if you're on the same page as these other rabbis.
Speaker 13Are you going to be anti-Semitic again and say no?
Speaker 9What?
Speaker 13Are you going to be anti-Semitic again and say no? You know, I've got the video where the rabbi states why there were bloodstained mattresses at 770 Chabad at the Chabad Lubavitch headquarters in New York. Do you want me to play that video for you so you can learn more about your history and what the Jews are doing in the tunnels all across America while they're incising little babies, bleeding them to death, because some of them are dead already, and staining those mattresses while praying for the spirit of Menachem Mendel Schneerson to be revived through this dead baby?
Speaker 13Do you want me to play that video?
Speaker 7Okay, here's the thing. You don't really believe this.
Speaker 13Can you acknowledge? Are you calling the rabbi a liar? No, nobody believes it. You don't believe it yourself. You have to adhere to rabbinical authority. Therefore, you have to accept whatever a rabbi says, even if he's wrong. So who am I to say the rabbi's wrong?
Speaker 13We really dug ourselves into a tunnel there, didn't we? I like the Roman salute. You're on a roll.
Speaker 7Please quit muting me.
Speaker 13You're not muted, man. You're talking right now.
Speaker 7Yeah, I'm talking now, yes. Now, can you repeat your statement again? Because Judaism is not Catholicism.
Speaker 13I thought this guy was high IQ. I have to repeat everything to him. I just find it funny.
Ian MalcolmI stepped away, and here we are 10 minutes later, and in the exact same spot, which is him making ridiculous comments while proclaiming himself high IQ, while suggesting that... Jews are at the top of all these power structures that he previously suggested they weren't, but now he's conceded that they are while also demanding that he's high IQ and going through the thousand years of Jewish oppression in the ghettos that he then walked back and said, no, it was actually just a thousand years they've been suppressed.
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm curious because truth, it seems like a thousand years ago, the Jews were so in fighting amongst one another that they deteriorated their society to the point that the Rome 2000, to the point that the Romans all kicked them out. because they were so easily conquered because they all hated each other. According to him, this is not my projection.
Ian MalcolmThis is Yitz's statement. So 1900 years ago, the Jews who hated each other were destroyed by the Romans who were then kicked out that then lived for a thousand years in the ghetto. Or so Yitz then walked back that lunacy too. But my point is he just runs around in circles while saying he's high IQ. We'll ultimately leave the conversation having learned nothing.
Ian MalcolmAnd then he'll go off and type for like three or four people that he's a brilliant individual and the world goes around.
Speaker 13Yeah. No, no. How do you think you're performing so far in the space?
Speaker 7I think it's really unfair. I think you mute me every two seconds.
Speaker 13It's just unfair.
Speaker 7I don't get a chance to speak.
Speaker 13You don't believe you're doing a good job?
Speaker 7No, no. How can I?
Speaker 13Have you been able to persuade people or do you believe you've established yourself as the victim here and it's just been unfair?
Speaker 7I haven't recorded. You're recording it. You're muting me every two seconds. Right now, you're not. One, two. Right now, you're not.
Speaker 13One, two. One, two. When were you muted?
Speaker 7throughout the entire conversation.
Speaker 13Really? It's a good thing it's recorded. Hey, Yitz, should we put up a poll to see if you've been muted every two seconds in this conversation?
Speaker 7Well, of course your audience is going to be biased.
Speaker 13Oh, the audience is biased, I guess.
Ian MalcolmHey, Yitz, can you make the poll on your page?
Speaker 13Go for it. I won't even vote. How about that?
Ian MalcolmWhat about this? Not how about this. I'm asking you a reasonable question. Why don't you make the poll so it's not biased?
Speaker 7If we don't interrupt each other the whole time and you don't moot me, I'll be quiet when you're talking, you be quiet when I'm talking, and I won't complain again about mooting or whatnot.
Ian MalcolmSo, yeah, it's just to suggest. So we started the conversation. You said it's crazy to suggest that Jews are at the top of all these power structures. You have now admitted that, in fact, they are. We then walked through.
Speaker 9I'm saying they could be.
Ian MalcolmNo, you didn't say they could be. You said that they are. You said you conceded that they are. That's very different than could be.
Speaker 7For the sake of argument. Oh, now it's for the sake of argument.
Ian MalcolmSo now we're adding that as a dependent clause onto the comment. Is that right?
Speaker 7That's what I always came back to. That's where you always came.
Ian MalcolmActually, I think when I go back to the recording, that's not going to be the case, but you're welcome to play that game of pill-pull. Now, here's the curiosity. So if we've established that Jews are in fact in charge of all those power structures, how do you think the Western world has done over the last 40 years? Has it gotten better or worse?
Speaker 7Well, it depends on what metrics you're using.
Ian MalcolmCan you list off five metrics that you would use to define? Okay, so you want to do life expectancy. Okay, can we add in To that mix, perhaps things like obesity, cancer rates, other things that you would loosely define as health. Is that reasonable?
Speaker 7Yeah, yeah.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so we'll go through those in a moment. Let's go through four other bullets.
Speaker 7Are Jews in charge of McDonald's now?
Ian MalcolmAre Jews in charge of McDonald's? I mean, we could certainly go through the health and the food and beverage industry.
Speaker 13Did McDonald's give free meals to the IDF?
Speaker 7Say again?
Speaker 13Did McDonald's give free meals to the IDF?
Speaker 7I don't know. Maybe. Maybe.
Speaker 13I hope so. So did they?
Speaker 7I hope so.
Speaker 13So they did. So you acknowledge they did. So why would they do that?
Speaker 7To be kind and redone the conflict with the mosque.
Ian MalcolmAh, it's not supremacy. It's just kindness when it benefits the Jews. Yitz, can you give us four other metrics that we could look at?
Speaker 7Well, let's see. Cultural medicine.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so culture. We'll look at the state of movies and of cinema for culture. Give us another. What's the third barometer there?
Speaker 7I support LGBT. You support LGBT.
Ian MalcolmYitz, are you a homosexual?
Speaker 8No.
Ian MalcolmYou're not a homosexual. Okay. But you support LGBT. I would actually say that LGBT goes against Christianity. Would you agree?
Speaker 7I'm not a Christian, so I don't care.
Ian MalcolmI understand that, but would you concede that it goes against Christianity?
Speaker 7No, it's not if I say so.
Ian MalcolmIt's very strange. Jews keep saying that, if I say so, as if I get to say how the world is. Can we live in fact? Does LGBT go against Christianity?
Speaker 7Okay, let's say yes. Okay, we will say yes.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so there we go. We're going to go the state of the nuclear family as the third bullet point. We've now got health... We've got culture defined as music and movies. We've now got LGBT. Can you give me a fourth bullet?
Speaker 7I would probably put LGBT within cultural, probably.
Ian MalcolmWell, loosely, but we could refer to the LGBT aspect as the state of the nuclear family.
Speaker 7We could also add in curriculum education. Okay, we could do education.
Ian MalcolmEducation's a good one. Truth, we'll get to education for sure. We'll certainly do education. We'll use things like reading levels as a way to maybe look at that. What would be your fifth bullet point for the state of a civilization?
Speaker 7I guess I ran out of ideas.
Ian MalcolmNo, you can't run out of ideas because you're really high IQ, right? Can you give me a fifth bullet?
Speaker 7Well, what would you want to add on?
Ian MalcolmI mean, we could look at things... How about national debt?
Speaker 7National debt?
Speaker 13Truth? That's a really good one. You could go to things like illicit drug use. Is there more national debt now today than there was 40 years ago yet?
Speaker 7Say again?
Speaker 13Is there more national debt today at $30 trillion? Oh, yes. Yeah, but a lot of that debt. Okay, that's great. I'm glad you acknowledge that. So why does one of the richest countries in the world with oil, its own oil, natural gas, its own mining resources, its own, of course, had a thriving tourism rate in various states around the world, forestry, and we can agree lots of natural resources have $38 trillion in debt.
Speaker 13Why would that be?
Speaker 7Because we went away from development. We've allowed China to make everything, essentially. But not all of the debt is owned to China.
Ian MalcolmWho do you think was in charge of a lot of those companies that outsourced all that production to, for example, China?
Speaker 7Oh, come on. Listen, listen. No, not all. Come on. Listen, listen, listen. Who was behind a lot of that outsourcing? It's probably not Jews.
@uncutspeechIt's probably not Jews. Really? That's the suggestion.
Speaker 13What would make you say that, Yitz? Well, you know, we're not exactly the... Let's try this a different way. So you acknowledge that national debt's gone up a lot, $38 trillion. Have Jewish hedge funds, BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, mainly run by Jews, 18 of the 25 biggest hedge funds run by Jews... Well, BlackRock is.
Speaker 13Hold on. Have they all gone up in value to the tune of billions and billions of dollars, over $10, $11 trillion for BlackRock, $36 trillion between BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, and, well, there's over 50% of the billionaires in the last 20 years are, well, Jewish. while the national debt has gone up to $38 trillion.
Speaker 13So would you agree, then, that Jews have profited and benefited handsomely over this 20-year period, while the American economy has suffered greatly because, well, over 20 years, 25 years ago, the debt was less than a trillion dollars.
Speaker 7That was before 2000. Now you just made a generalized statement because, you know. I'm just noticing. I haven't benefited at all.
@uncutspeechBy the way, by the way, Yitz, let's look at the, let's look at who was the Fed chairs in the past 20 years, too. I haven't benefited. You've got Powell. You've got Yellen. Let's not forget Bernanke either, right, in 2008. So it's not just the hedge funds as well. We're talking about the people that make the policy too.
Speaker 13So nobody talked about you just because you haven't benefited from it. Though you're high IQ, somehow you failed to take advantage of all these perks and benefits that Jews get. While they're recognized as a special minority status in America, they get access to billions of dollars in loans and grants. And they're the highest earning ethnic minority, according to their own statistics.
Speaker 13Yet you didn't benefit from it. That's interesting. But as I was saying, since we're noticing patterns of national debt, $38 trillion, $250 trillion in unfunded liabilities. So we can agree the state of the economy has gotten worse. If you're not going to fix it. The financial status of Jews has gotten worse as well.
Speaker 7Let's hope Trump fixes it.
Speaker 13It's not about, well, why would it need fixing if things are great? Actually, actually. So now you acknowledge that things aren't great, Ian, and they need to be fixed. Interesting.
Speaker 7Yeah, of course.
Speaker 13So what needs to be fixed, Yitz?
Speaker 7Well, I'm not an economist, but Elon Musk.
Speaker 13You're a problem solver, right?
Speaker 7Okay, it doesn't mean I'm not an encyclopedia.
Speaker 13Elon Musk said that if we cut everything, you know, giving 3.8 billion or whatever, he said if we cut everything like 4.8 to Israel, around 15 to 20 billion dollars or well over almost 400 billion dollars to Ukraine the last three years. Since we're cutting everything and 40 billion dollars to Argentina, also run by a Jew in Millet, Javier Millet.
Speaker 7He's not Jewish.
Speaker 13He says he is Jewish. What's his real last name, Yitz? It's short for what? He's not Jewish. I'm just asking what his real last name is. You're a smart, high IQ Jew. What's his real last name?
Speaker 8Nazi Jewish last name.
Speaker 13You can just say it's Polish if you want. You can do it, Yitz. Come on. You can do it. I'm on your side, bro.
Speaker 9So Google it.
Speaker 13Google. Well, I don't need to. I already know what it is. It's Milikowski. You know who else has that last name?
Speaker 7Is it spelled with an I or an Y?
Speaker 13I don't think it matters.
Speaker 7Nice try, buddy.
Speaker 13I see, I see. You're going to change the vowel of the last letter and say, but it's different. Well, why did he shorten it then?
Speaker 7You ask him.
Speaker 13Okay, and why did Benjamin Enyahu change his last name from Milikowski to Enyahu?
Speaker 7Because when you enter Knesset, you know, you make it more easy. But he changed his last name before he entered the Knesset.
Speaker 13Hold on, hold on. When he was an ambassador in 1985, he wasn't a member of the Knesset. He already had a different last name. When he was serving in Syrette McCall, he was under an Enyahu.
Speaker 7Yes, yes. Now, here's what's very interesting.
Speaker 13Before he entered the Knesset.
Speaker 7Here's what's very interesting. You're going to try to say that he was Polis. But Bibi looks the most Jewish you could ever look.
Speaker 13I don't disagree that he's Jewish. I don't disagree that he's Jewish. I think we can both agree that Javier Milikowski and Benjamin Milikowski are likely related because they have the same last name. It's a very unique last name. So therefore we can agree that the leader of Argentina is Jewish. And do you know who backed him?
Speaker 13I don't think he is. One step at a time. I'm a simple guy. I'm slow. So who backed Javier Milik in Argentina?
Speaker 7I'm not Argentinian, so tell me.
Speaker 13Well, come on. Give it a guess. Give it a stop. Who's the richest farm owner in Argentina? Do you think it was a Jew, maybe?
Speaker 7Okay, let's say it was.
Speaker 13Eduardo Elchi? Are you familiar with that name? Do you know who he's friends with? He's friends with George Soros or Georgie Schwartz. Oh, thank God.
Speaker 9I thought you were going to say Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 13I mean, they probably don't know each other. They're all one degree of separation at this point, aren't they? I mean, the Jews are just so tightly knit. They're such a tightly knit community, so family-loving. Yes, that's why Mark Twain said we were the best of charity. That's why Mark Twain said we were the best of charity.
Speaker 13The Jews stick together, right, Yitz? So now we know that Javier Millet, who's Jewish based on his own admission, who also went to the wall, kissed the wall, converted to Judaism, so he says, like, full-on Orthodox Judaism, because he might have been maybe a liberal Jew before that.
Speaker 7I can see it's for sake of argument.
Speaker 13Who backed him, Yitz?
Speaker 7Okay, what's your point? Eduardo Elstein.
Speaker 13Does Elstein sound like a, I don't know, a Christian last name to you? Sound like a Muslim last name to you?
@uncutspeechIt's a traditional native indigenous Argentinian name right there.
Speaker 7Okay, so where was he going?
Speaker 13He was the one that backed him. You're going to say that we also control Argentina? I'm just curious. After Millet was elected to power, did he do any favors for his friend Eduardo Elstein after that?
Speaker 13I'm just wondering why Argentina became broke a year after Javier Millet takes power, and then Trump immediately, because he's told to do so by, well, his... treasury secretary, whose buddies with Elstein and others, decides to convince Trump to give Argentina $40 billion because their economy is basically on the verge of bankruptcy for like the 10th time in 200 years?
Speaker 13Yes.
Speaker 7So that proves that we're not to blame for it, by the way. Let's go with your argument. Let's pretend he was Jewish.
Speaker 13Are you going to blame the Argentinians who have no power and no agency?
Speaker 7See, it's amazing how you guys You know, you're the one claiming they have no agency, not me.
Speaker 13I'm claiming ordinary Argentinians don't have agency or power to push back because they're the one who just left and gave up. But the guys at the top, the multi-billionaires like Eduardo Elshin have all the agency and the power because they can install whoever they want in power who can then give back kickbacks, you know, bankrupt the country and then just get, well, these bailouts.
Speaker 7Well, he's fixing the country, so he's actually doing good.
Speaker 13So the country's doing well. It's doing well, but it needed a bailout?
Speaker 7I have a friend who's buying stock.
Speaker 13When you fail, just so we're clear, because I want to understand the Jewish logic here. So your definition of success and doing well is when the country's basically bankrupt and needs a bailout?
Speaker 7Now, wait a minute. No, that's not what I said. You said that the country was failing on 10 separate times, which is true. And he came in, he became president and he started fixing it. Maybe he got some help from Trump.
Speaker 13He started fixing it. And now it's doing well. He was backed by a Jew. He had the full belief and confidence of his Jewish backer who enabled him to win. He fired off like more than two thirds of the government staff. Yeah, and it's doing good. He imposed austerity measures. Well, let's go through. Let's go through. He caused over, you know, there is still inflation in Argentina.
Speaker 13There's inflation everywhere. So he punished all of the citizens collectively. through austerity measures as well, a lot of them just moved left because there's nothing they could do. There's no job opportunity there, and they pay shit. They can't afford to live anymore. And yet they still needed a bailout. So where'd all the money go that he was supposedly saving?
Speaker 13Trump even removed, he was so kind, he even removed the tariffs off of exports of meat from Argentina into America to help the economy, right? Because Argentinians need help. Because for some reason, the Jewish-backed leader, who was also a Jew, fucked over the economy and the citizens again.
Speaker 7Okay, so since you know so much about Israel and Judaism and everything... Tell me.
Speaker 13Why are you changing the subject again? I'm a slow boy.
Speaker 7What's the price on a 20% down payment on an apartment in Jerusalem?
Speaker 13When you get scalloped and change topics, I lose my train of thought. What's the price tag? What's the price tag on a 20% down payment on an apartment in Jerusalem? It's amazing how he talks to the mute. Just a second. You made the comment. You made the comment that Elon Musk said we should cut everything. So I said, okay, cool.
Speaker 13So cut all foreign aid to Israel. Argentina and Ukraine. Are you okay with that?
Speaker 17I guess he's got to consult his massage handler.
Speaker 16Come on, Yitz. I'm on your side. You can do it.
Speaker 13Well, we can take a brief pause, go to some other hands. Congrats to Ian on 100K. Well earned, well deserved. Really, it took too long. And yet, you really should be following Ian. I mean, look how much time he spends on the space. He's probably gotten a few followers out of it.
Speaker 10He's back.
Speaker 17Guess who's back.
Speaker 13I can't hear him. No, no, it's not you.
Speaker 10It's him. It's him. He acts like that. Oh, he dropped. Okay, he wants to come back up. It's fine.
Speaker 13I sent him a mic. He can come back up to finish his very persuasive, well-thought-out argument to persuade a lot of people.
Speaker 17Okay, well, I guess he doesn't want to come back up.
Speaker 13Yitz, since I know you're recording this space, I sent you a mic twice. I don't think you got muted every two seconds either because you've got a lot of words in. I guess you just gave up. You quit. I don't know, man. Is that part of the Jewish faith to just quit? You're high IQ. You're so smart. You're doing so well. You just, well, you ran away.
Speaker 13Oh, well, too bad. So sad. Hope you guys are enjoying the space. If you haven't already, please retweet it. Yeah, shout out to Ian on reaching 100K. Maybe the Jew will come back and make some better arguments. He's got to go consult his Mossad handlers. He will debrief a little, shed some tears, come back.
Speaker 17I don't know who's next. Oh, go ahead, Spirit.
@spirit__saintI just want to say I think you handled him really well, and you had a great dialogue with him. I was really upset when he said that Jews did not benefit, or at least he did not benefit from those policies. And yet we're supposed to sit here and hear how whites benefited from slavery and we should feel bad about it.
Speaker 13You are, you're back.
Speaker 7Okay.
Speaker 13So since you're back on, do you acknowledge I sent you a mic twice?
Speaker 7Yes, yes, you did. For some reason, I had.
Speaker 13So you weren't really treated unfairly, right?
Speaker 7When I lost connection.
Speaker 13You had your Jewish connection Wi-Fi that sucked. And I guess your audio cut out. So we're trying to recycle you. Now you're back. able to make whatever arguments you think are most persuasive. And I guess from your point of view, effective, right? You have that opportunity.
Speaker 7Oh, yes. You've given me some opportunity. Congratulations.
Speaker 13There we have it. The Jews treated fairly with respect. Thank you.
Speaker 7Now you have. So I wanted to, so what was somebody said they were going to ask and ask a question? Go ahead.
Speaker 13So here's the question is very simple. I'll repeat it since though you're high IQ, you seem to forget a lot. No, no, no.
Speaker 7I didn't hear. Somebody said they wanted to ask a question.
Speaker 13You didn't hear, of course. Of course. Selective hearing. Got it. So the question, once again, you said Elon Musk says we should cut everything to fix the economy because it's in a bad state of affairs. You also acknowledged that, well, it was Donald Trump who needs to fix things, though, well, the U.S. economy is supposedly not in bad shape, but yet needs fixing.
Speaker 13So as far as the fixing and cutting goes, should Donald Trump and the U.S. administration cut all foreign aid funding to Israel, Ukraine, and Argentina? Yes or no?
Speaker 7To Israel? Yes.
Speaker 13Why not Ukraine and also Argentina?
Speaker 7I feel like Ukraine needs it in their efforts against Putin.
Speaker 13Ukraine? Why is it the U.S.'s problem what Ukraine needs? It's their problem, isn't it?
Speaker 7Well, they're an ally, and we don't want Putin to gobble up.
Speaker 13Are they a part of NATO?
Speaker 14What kind of ally are they? What do they do for us?
Speaker 7Right now, Zelensky is single-handedly pushing back... Like what? A million men under Putin's command? Single-handedly?
Speaker 13He's doing it single-handedly, right? Wait a minute. Do you really think Russia has done a full flex on Ukraine and it's Ukraine that's just doing a valiant job and pushing back? Or is it because Russia's gone easy and not leveled cities like Kyiv and Lviv and all those Western Ukrainian cities that are still very much up and running?
Speaker 13Let's just call a spade a spade. I mean, Russia is a...
Speaker 9They leveled Mariupol.
Speaker 13And independent rankings of armies say that, well, Russia's got maybe the second or third most powerful army in the world. Do you really think that army can't wipe out Ukraine anytime they want with several of their missiles?
Speaker 7I'll put it like this. They claim it's an existential conflict. So if it was so existential, you'd think they would want to use all of their assets available. Now, it's been over three years, and they can't get air superiority.
Speaker 13Okay, so if you really want to go there... What would be the consequence if they decided to expand the warfare and, say, hit one of those NATO cities that's actively supporting Ukraine, such as, say, Poland or Romania or any one of those Baltic states?
Speaker 7That would ignite World War III.
Speaker 13That would ignite and also cause NATO to invoke Article 5 and then cause basically World War III. Who's trying to avoid World War III?
Speaker 7Well, I mean, this is like a trick question.
Speaker 13If Russia wants, all it has to do is strike Poland or Romania. No, no, no, no, no, no. And by the way, didn't a Polish farmer get killed by a missile that Ukraine tried to blame on Russia when, in fact, it was their own missile? That was back in 2023. Oh, no, no, no. I believe. After Poland itself did its own independent investigation, they concluded it was actually a Ukrainian missile that did that.
Speaker 7I thought it was a Russian missile and that they just they just didn't want to.
Speaker 13But Ukraine lied before an investigation was done to try to get NATO to invoke Article 5. So Russia didn't actually kill that Polish farmer. So now we can agree there's Ukraine trying to cause World War III. No, no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 7If it wasn't Ukraine, it was an accident. It was an accident.
Speaker 13If it was an accident, then why did Ukraine blame Russia?
Speaker 7Maybe because at the beginning, you don't know. That's why you do an investigation.
Speaker 7That's why you investigate.
Speaker 13And why did Ukraine say it was a Russian missile? All the headlines were dominated with that particular heading. Why is that?
Speaker 7Okay, okay. So let's get back to the Israel was foreign aid.
Speaker 13Oh, now you want to change the subject again, Ian.
Ian MalcolmWell, no, no, no. You never finish. So we acknowledge that the deficit has gotten worse. We can easily identify that the waistlines of your average Westerners are getting wider. uh... we can also look at the use of ssr eyes and hardcore drugs which are increasing along with alcoholism which has hit its highest rates post cove it uh... if we compare to the eighties uh... so you want to talk about those we can look at movies and music i think it's pretty easy to determine that when literally cardi b or nikki minaj or the poster children of the republicans at turning point u s a which makes zero sense given that they sing songs about their wet a s s you know what
Ian Malcolmthat that is somehow supposed to be lifted up as highbrow culture. So culture is getting worse. So the deficit's worse. The human bodies are worse. The music is worse. The financials of those people is clearly worse. Yitz, I have to beg you the question. You've admitted in your assertion that, yes, Jews control all these power structures.
Ian MalcolmCan you identify any area in which the world has gotten better since that's taken place over the last, let's say, 30 or 40 years?
Speaker 7So let me put it like this. It's the audience, for example, who want to watch porn on film and TV.
Ian MalcolmWait, pause, pause.
@uncutspeechYou're going to suggest that the audience... I love that you brought up porn, Ian. Those dang fentanyl addicts doing it to themselves.
Ian MalcolmThose dang... Wait, wait, wait. So your suggestion is that the world has gotten better under Jewish supremacy because porn is now more widely available. No, no, no.
Speaker 7That's not what I said. No, that's a misquote. What I said is that you have the masses, for example... Let's say the culture was in the tubes where they like that kind of thing. And so, of course, Hollywood's going to cater to it.
Ian MalcolmYitz, can I ask you a question? Hang on, pause, pause, pause. Yitz, if a group of people are given highbrow culture and they are continuously fed classical music, highbrow education, intelligence, and they are told to revere things like culture, family.
Speaker 7I think most people would reject it.
Ian MalcolmYou think most people would reject it? Yitz, what percentage of the United States was Christian in 1970?
Speaker 7I have no idea.
Ian MalcolmAh, you have no idea. Do you think it's more or less than presently?
Speaker 7It was probably more.
Ian MalcolmIt's probably more. Okay, what do you think has the cultural influence that has deteriorated Christianity in the West?
Speaker 7You think everyone listened to Mozart in the 70s?
Ian MalcolmAh, no, well, certainly more people did than presently. So what do you think it is that caused a cataclysmic drop in Christian values in the West?
Speaker 7I think part of it, you can go back to Vietnam. And you had the whole counter-cultural revolution.
Ian MalcolmInteresting.
Speaker 13Isn't it funny he's walking into these traps? Who's the Secretary of State then that was pushing for that Vietnam War?
Speaker 13Come on, Yates, hurry up and juggle. You can type faster. Why does he raise his hand? He has a microphone.
Speaker 7Because you muted me again. I was muted.
Speaker 13I see. So who is the Secretary of State that pushed for the Vietnam War and also beyond the Vietnam War, expanded the war into Cambodia and Laos and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians? Kissinger. Where was Kissinger from? What's his ethnicity?
Speaker 7Okay, but here's the problem that you all make. You take one...
Speaker 13Yes, I'm sorry. I'm not a high IQ Jew like you. You take one example and you generalize. Is it one example?
Ian MalcolmAnd yet it's true or false. It was you who brought up that period of time and suggested that that war, which would have been pushed by that Secretary of State, was one of the catalysts for that destruction of Christianity.
@uncutspeechI want to point something out to you, by the way. Every time that we say a name, you say, yeah, but that's one example. And now it's been like 10 or 15 examples of different Jewish guys doing crazy stuff. And then you're like, yeah, but that's one example.
Speaker 7But there's been like... Do you want me to name all of the examples? Okay, so look. We have 6 million examples. Here's one thing, if I can talk for a moment, that we did that is a blessing for the whole world for eternity.
Ian MalcolmDo you want to hear about it? Was it requesting for the death of Jesus Christ?
Speaker 6Damn, I was going to say killing God.
Speaker 7So... So the man's name was Fritz Habel. He was Jewish. I thought you were going to say Oppenheimer.
@uncutspeechSorry, go ahead.
Speaker 7And he figured out a way. Yeah, but just laugh off Oppenheimer, right?
@uncutspeechLet's laugh off the guy that created the weapon that can destroy the world, right? And let's talk about the good thing that one random Jew did. Anyway, sorry.
Speaker 7No, no, he did not create Zyklon B. Others created it with his resource.
Speaker 13How about chemotherapy? Goodman and Gilman created chemotherapy to treat cancer. Do you think that was a good thing?
Speaker 7Probably. Many people have been cured. You do think so?
Speaker 13Are you aware there are studies that show that... chemotherapy helps to treat or cure cancer in less than 2% of instances. It has a 98% failure rate. And then most people with cancer don't die from the cancer, but die from the treatment, which is chemotherapy.
Speaker 7If it was that high, nobody would do it.
Speaker 13Hospitals would be sued.
Speaker 7Do you know why people do it? Companies would be sued.
Speaker 13Hold on. It needs to be sued because insurance companies or pharmaceutical companies can be sued. Well, let's see. Has Pfizer ever been sued before?
Speaker 7I don't know. Probably not then.
Speaker 13Yes, they have. They have been sued. How can you say that? I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I don't believe the vaccine. Yeah, you're the high-AQ Jew, so these aren't hard questions. When Pfizer got sued for putting out a drug that killed people, what happened? What was the consequence of that lawsuit? I don't know. Tell me.
Speaker 13They were fined $2 billion. It was a criminal charge, and then it was just business as usual. Do you know how much they made in profits from that drug?
Speaker 7Okay, but they gave up $2 billion.
Speaker 13So there you go. They did a cost-benefit analysis like, well, 300,000 people, it'll cost us $2 billion, but we can make $20 billion. Kind of like how the Sackler family, they put out, of course, oxycodone and Percocet. This is during the 2000s. Yeah, that family was terrible. I'm a simple guy. I can't keep up with your pace.
Speaker 13I'm low IQ. I'm sorry. So anyway, the Sackler family, they're all Jewish, right? You're aware of that. They came up with Purdue Pharma and they lobbied Congress, of course, and the FDA to legalize that right away, which they did. And then they incentivized doctors to over-prescribe it. That killed over 600,000 Americans.
Speaker 13Do you know how much their fine was? They were evil. I agree. I just asked. It was a whole family of Jews. Yeah, one family. Are you familiar with the Hippocratic Oath?
Speaker 7You people think like... What is the Hippocratic Oath?
Speaker 13Wait, they're all evil. I understand that. But they're all doctors. What is the Hippocratic Oath? What is the main objective? What is the main thing that all doctors have to adhere to? What is it?
Speaker 7To try to save the patient.
Speaker 13To do no harm, right? Yes. You agree. Okay. So do you agree the Sacklers, who are all doctors, licensed physicians, did some harm?
Speaker 7Oh, yeah, of course.
Speaker 13Did any of them go to jail?
Speaker 7Well, yeah. I can't work a lot.
Speaker 13...held criminally liable for incentivizing other doctors... I would imagine... ...which disproportionately impacted white Americans, not Jewish Americans, because, well, Jews will never take that shitty drug, just like Jews will also never do chemotherapy because they know it doesn't work and it will likely kill you. Because chemotherapy consists of using a biochemical weapon called mustard gas with nitrogen that literally wipes out all of your cells, not just the tumor cells, but also, say, your liver and kidney cells, so that, well, six months later, when you get some kind of infection, you basically die because you have no more immune system to fight off.
Speaker 7You do the research.
Speaker 13Let's just stay on the Sackler family. Let's stay on the Sackler family. So they got fined $6 billion. Do you know how much the Sackler family made in profits from selling oxycodone? Probably too much.
Speaker 7And they will pay for it. They will pay for it.
Speaker 13I just asked you a simple question. Do you know how much they made overall in profits? Over $20 billion. So they paid $6 billion. They got to keep about $14 billion. Even $20 billion is a soft conservative estimate because even the judge conceded in that case they have overseas shells and accounts that weren't accounted for when they did a full analysis, a full audit of all their accounts.
Speaker 13So that was just on what they could actually decipher. But the judges allow them to keep the bulk of their profits. That's too bad. Hold on. When a Jewish-run pharmacy or a Jewish-run company does a cost-benefit analysis that will involve killing millions of people, do you think they're going to care about a few billion dollars in fines when they can make $20 or $30 billion?
Speaker 7Many companies do this, not just Jews. Really?
Speaker 13Can you name those other companies?
Speaker 7We could look it up. Can you name one? Yes, come on.
Speaker 7Well, I'm sure plenty of them exist. Plenty of them exist.
@spirit__saintFor example, Jewish companies do exist, yes. Well, don't let them know.
Ian MalcolmI know we're not allowed to talk about IQ. I got a funny game for you, because we got lots of speakers that are up here, and I think TruthTeller and I both kind of played, well, we could almost call it tennis with you, volleying ideas, but... It felt kind of like Djokovic and Nadal on one side of the court and then a three-year-old and the other wildly flailing in the air.
Ian MalcolmSo I want to play a game, actually. And what I want to do is I want to go throughout some of the speakers here. And allow them to go back and forth with you about a topic and to see how perhaps some of these ideas that truth that I have suggested to the world might be sticking with some of those that are in here. So you can do a little volley with some of these various individuals.
Ian MalcolmIf anybody, I see Gen Z has his hand up. So here's what we're going to do. Get ready. because now we're going to have you get to go back and forth with Gen Z Patriot for all three minutes, and then we'll go up to maybe Heidi or Dredd or anybody else that wants to maybe play this game. And so, Yitz, here's the question.
Ian MalcolmWe talked about some of these different areas of focus, and you basically conceded that all of them over the last four or five decades have gotten worse. And so I'm curious. If you've conceded, which you have, that this group of people have essentially all of the reins of power, can you please explain to Gen Z Patriot an area where the world has gotten better in the West, in the United States, over the last 30 years?
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm going to see how he would do, let's say, denying your suggestion.
Speaker 7Yeah, we still live in the best country in the world. You can, even the most important...
Speaker 3Yeah, how would you define that?
Speaker 13You were never muted. Thank you for the Roman salute. You weren't muted. Can you answer the question? You said it's still the greatest country in the world. Define that.
Speaker 7Yes, I was just muted. You were not muted.
Speaker 15You're lying right now. No one muted you. I'm going to continue. Yes, you're going to continue.
Speaker 7You're going to ignore the true statement that Truth just made. Can I ask you a question? Go ahead.
Speaker 3So if there was a foreign disease, right, that spread off throughout Israel, and you guys just for whatever reason lacked the capability to cure that, but America had the right cure, right? Like, we had it. And we brought it over to you guys, and we admitted it to everybody, right? Everybody got it. And then so many people started getting sick and dying, and you sued us, and we made about, you know, $6 million worth of profits, but we gave $1 million back.
Speaker 3Would you guys be cool with that? Because we gave $1 million back, right?
Speaker 7No, and I said the Sackler family...
Speaker 3So you said no, but about 35 seconds ago, you just said, well, they gave $2 billion back. So it's actually okay that a bunch of Americans died, right?
@uncutspeechBut those were Gentiles, Gen Z.
Speaker 3That's the difference.
Speaker 7No, no, that's not the difference. The difference is what the family asked for.
Speaker 3The difference is that we're not Jews, correct?
Speaker 7No, no, the difference is what the... By the way, not all of Israel's population are Jews. There's 21% Arabs. No, no, no, I'm talking about the vaccine, right?
Speaker 3Like, they got fined. Right. And then they but you just said, I heard you. We can go back on the recording. You said, well, they gave two billion back. Right. So it makes it OK. So if we came over there to Israel and did it, you'd be OK with that. Right. It's the reciprocated property. Right.
Speaker 7I mean, you're kind of your analogy fails because you're just saying six million to one million. And of course, we're making a Holocaust. Let's say this.
Speaker 3Let's say it's proportionately accurate. It'd be OK if we did it to you. Right.
Speaker 7No, and I've admitted it. I said, fine, then I'll change my views.
Speaker 3We should feel a certain way. That should be a pattern recognition staple, right? We should see that and say, okay, there's the people that are responsible for that. We should look out for those people. Would you agree with that?
Speaker 7I said the Sackler family was incorrect.
Speaker 3No, no, no, I'm saying if we came over to Israel and we did that, you would all look and point for the people responsible and say, okay, those guys did that to us. Would you agree?
Speaker 7Yeah, fine.
Speaker 3Yeah, so that's all we're doing. So you agree?
Speaker 7Yeah, no, no, here's the difference. You should blame the Sackler family alone, not all Jews. That's the difference.
Speaker 3Okay, how about Dr. Drew Wiseman? I appreciate your performance, so I thank you for that. Ian, this is recorded, correct?
Ian MalcolmOh, yeah, it is. Isn't it curious because every time it will be, oh, well, that's just one example. Oh, you should blame them. Oh, don't take any collective aim at anybody. No, don't notice those patterns. But then the same person will say, we've just been collectively hated by all of you all the time. And he will say, you people, over and over again.
Ian MalcolmIt's very curious how the double standards apply.
Speaker 7Then I won't. Then I won't.
Ian MalcolmThen you won't going forward. But you're going to, first and foremost. And I promise you, because it's a recorded space, we'll have a great example of it in a not-so-distant future. But that's the curiosity, because it does seem like at every turn... There is this strange double standard where, first and foremost, there's doublespeak.
Ian MalcolmAnd what I mean by that is you will say something and then say the antithesis of that thing just moments later when the roles are reversed. And instead of being about Jews, it's towards the Jews or of the Jews or from the Jews. And then you will say continuously. that that's just one example and and you've you got caught saying that three minutes ago and then when the sack or feel like a visa well that's just another family like every single time if we go over and over and over again let let me ask you a question yes how many of these patterns do we have to acknowledge that have the same root cause before we could suggest that there's a group of people intentionally destroying things
Speaker 7Let's be honest. You'd have to have 100%.
Ian MalcolmWait, it has to be 100%? So just out of curiosity, yes, yes, yes. So you'd have to have 100% of murders in the United States be committed by black people before you could say that blacks are disproportionately violent. Is that right?
Speaker 7I don't believe blacks are disproportionately violent. You don't believe that they are?
Ian MalcolmDo you know what percentage of murders in the United States are committed by black people?
Speaker 7You're going to say it's a whole lot.
Ian MalcolmWell, no, I'm not going to say that. I'm going to say that the FBI suggests that 54% of them are committed by blacks who make up 13% of the country.
Speaker 7A lot are done by whites.
Ian MalcolmYes, but do you understand the concept of over-representation or of per capita?
Speaker 7Yes.
Ian MalcolmOkay, can you define per capita?
Speaker 7Look, per capita, as a prime example, is like Israel. Israel's... We outrank Japan, Germany per capita in GDP.
Ian MalcolmIn GDP per capita. Okay, so define per capita for anybody that's not following exactly what you're trying to suggest there.
Speaker 7Per capita, it's like you're taking, it's basically taking a representation of something. And it's like, so look, so here's, let me put it like this. You have 6 million Jews who were passed, who died in the Holocaust. and you had about 22 million Russians. Now, per capita, we suffered more because our population overall is smaller.
Speaker 7But if you expand it to fill the same weight, we suffered more as a people overall.
Ian MalcolmOkay, good job. So when a small group of people make up a disproportionate amount of something, you could say that they, per capita, are overrepresented. Is that right?
Speaker 7You could say so if the data that you're quoting is correct.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so if 13% of the country commit 54% of the crime... Is that an over-representation of that group per capita?
Speaker 7Yes, assuming, but however, if it is true, we also have to go to, okay, what is the undercurrent? Why? What is causing this to happen?
Ian MalcolmOkay, what do you think would justify that as an undercurrent that would not then therefore be a reflection on the group of people that are doing that violence?
Speaker 7Well, clearly, for the moment, for sake of argument, because then I'll be accused of having conceded, as is my own personal belief, but for sake of argument, if we say you're correct... Obviously, the FBI is saying I'm correct for what it's worth. Okay, so let's go with that for now. I mean, there's a motivation, a lack of education, for example.
Ian MalcolmDo you think Blacks have less access to education in the Western world than impoverished whites?
Speaker 7Well, many black communities do have less education access.
Ian MalcolmNo, not less education, less access. Do you think that blacks in New York City have less access to education than poor whites in Appalachia, which are commonly referred to as the south, or what would it be? It'd be the southeast along the mountainous countries.
Speaker 7Those people as well have less educational access.
Ian MalcolmOkay, do you think those people, do you think the poorest of whites that are in those communities commit more or less violence than blacks?
Speaker 7They do commit a lot of violence in those communities.
Ian MalcolmThey commit a lot of violence, you suggest. Here's how we're going to do this. What percent more violence do you think the richest blacks in the United States commit compared to the poorest whites?
Speaker 7Well, you Google it.
Ian MalcolmNo, I don't need to Google it. I know this data off the top of my head. Do you want to take a wild guess?
Speaker 7No, just say it.
Ian MalcolmOkay, it's at more than 2x the rate. The richest blacks... terms of violent crime are more than twice as likely to commit it than literally the lowest bracket of income whites in the country so now given that and given that there is far less access in rural communities with poor whites than there are in urban black areas whether it's new york or chicago or baltimore which have plenty more access as well as financing for what it's worth for public education so if blacks have more access to education why do you think it is that blacks even in those communities commit more violence than the most impoverished least educated whites
Speaker 7You could also have biased teachers, for example.
Ian MalcolmHow do you think the biased teachers would construct additional violence?
Speaker 7In Appalachia, this would not be the case because they would be connected by their whiteness.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so hang on. So your suggestion is that white teachers in Appalachian poor, white, impoverished communities are less, let's say, compassionate towards their students than the inner city teachers who receive more financing and are, oh, by the way, disproportionately black. Is that the suggestion?
Speaker 7I don't know if they're all disproportionately black.
Ian MalcolmNo, they are. I'll get you the data on that as well. So your suggestion is that it's the teachers that are constructed. It can't have anything to do with genetics or culture or behavior or single-parent families or any of those.
Speaker 7Well, here's what's interesting, Ian. I can prove that it was an environment that caused our boost in IQ.
Ian MalcolmSo your suggestion is that because of your supposed claim in IQ, which I can actually deny for what it's worth, and we can walk through why that might be, and I can maybe use you as a microcosm of the demonstration of the not-so-high IQ. But just to play that game, because you want to talk about education, who do you think in New York City score better?
Ian MalcolmDo you think it's Hasidic Jewish schools? Do you think it is non-Hasidic but Jewish schools? Or do you think it is private, non-Jewish affiliated schools? Who do you think performs the best in New York City?
Speaker 7I would say all Jewish schools perform probably just as well.
Ian MalcolmWhat if they actually produce at the bottom of that statistic? What would you say to that?
Speaker 7Actually, there was a study once that showed the opposite. It showed that Ashkenazim who are already Hasidic or whatever, whichever, you know, if they're Litmus, if they're Breslov, whatever you want to say, they'll actually IQ scores are just as high as a second old... Oh, well, I don't recall what study is.
Ian MalcolmAh, so you don't know the study. Is it curious that you're going to these IQ tests rather than standardized tests that are put out by the city of New York itself?
Speaker 7We can look through that.
Ian MalcolmWhat would you say is standardized testing if Jewish schools underperformed relative to those of non-Jewish private schools? What would you say to that?
Speaker 7So you're saying if in Yeshiva they underperformed to non-Jewish public schools? I mean, theoretically it's possible because in Yeshiva they don't study.
Ian MalcolmWould that deny, prospectively, the idea of high Jewish IQ?
Speaker 7No, no, here's what I would say, what it would do. It would not deny the high IQ on average, but it would show that those heredium were not properly trained. That's what it would show.
Ian MalcolmIt's that they were not trained. Okay, so just out of curiosity.
Speaker 7Just like a black...
Ian MalcolmJust like the... No, that's actually not like the blacks. I would say that black standardized testing has more to do with genetics than it does a lack of access to education. And that's because I have maybe uncomfortable views when it comes to the ability of the minds of those individuals. And I would say the exact same thing if we were to look at Ashkenazi Jews.
Ian MalcolmIt seems like most of the tests are disingenuous, if not just flat-out dishonest, and seem to over-exaggerate the... mental capacity or acuity of Jews, which, when I debate, seem to really underperform you. It's as you have done in this very space.
Speaker 7So I don't know what to tell you. So here's what's really interesting. Because if I mention Hollywood or the media, then you'll say it was nepotism. But how, you know, if we're so bad... Actually, yes, I would say it's nepotism for what it's worth when it comes to Hollywood. Is Larry Ellison related to...
Speaker 13It's just a simple question. I'm a simple guy. Is Larry Ellison related to David Ellison?
Speaker 7You mean the son, David Ellison?
Speaker 13Correct. Correct.
Speaker 7David Ellison is the son of Larry Ellison, right?
Speaker 13Very interesting. I'm glad you acknowledge that. So do you acknowledge that Larry Ellison helped his son, David Ellison, who runs that something dance company?
Speaker 11Skydance.
Speaker 13Purchase. Skydance company will, of course, purchase both Paramount and a bunch of other media companies such as CNN and CBS News. where they then installed Barry Weiss into power, who had, well, no real experience when it came to running an actual media. He just had like a sub stack called Free Press. It's a smart lady.
Speaker 13So she's a smart lady. So there was no nepotism there. It wasn't because she was Jewish.
Speaker 7So this is why I'm going to mention my argument. For the sake of argument, I will concede. I'll concede for the sake of argument.
Ian MalcolmI appreciate that you're conceding.
Speaker 7And here's why. Here's why. Because that's what gets really interesting. If we are not that smart, if it's just nepotism, and if it has nothing to do with the environment, because I don't, you know, I believe all of this originates from the environment, then we should never have produced anyone like Niels Bohr or Albert Einstein.
Speaker 7It should never have happened.
Ian MalcolmWell, we could go into Einstein, but I don't, yeah.
Speaker 7Did it happen with the armists? Where's the Einstein almost? This argument doesn't even follow.
Ian MalcolmWhere is the Einstein? The curious thing is, if I'm not mistaken, it was the Renaissance that brought almost all of the intellect, the art, the great architecture, and all the wonders to Europe. Do you want to take a wild guess who makes up almost every aspect of that period of time?
Speaker 7Yes, it was.
Ian MalcolmThey made the world beautiful. For what it's worth, up in the nest, I put the academic agent. Let me read it off from him. Hang on, I'm going to mute you now. Here's from the academic agent. Another blow to the high IQ myth. People are focusing on Hasidic element, but look at the middle set of data. Completely unremarkable and below average for private schools.
Ian MalcolmNow, what is that middle data set? The funny part here is the Hasidic boys' schools perform basically below almost all of the public schools, which is pretty curious in and of itself. If you then look at Hasidic girls' schools, they do slightly better. Other Jewish schools, slightly better nonetheless. But it's the other private schools, in particular those that are Catholic...
Ian Malcolmthat do remarkably better. So Yitz, I've got a question for you. Do you think that there's a higher per capita, since you enjoyed that word there a little second ago, do you think per capita that Hasidic schools or other private schools have a larger per capita representation of Jews?
Ian MalcolmCome on, Yitz, you can do it.
Speaker 15He likes giving the Roman salutes.
Ian MalcolmIt's very bizarre. He keeps raising his hand instead of just turning on the mic. He's teasing us right now. He's like baiting us.
Speaker 13Just slow at typing. He types one finger at a time, so it's slow.
Ian MalcolmHe's going to Grok. Grok, please defend how Hasidic... Jews score so much worse than private school Catholic boys, and simultaneously we're so much smarter.
Speaker 7The meeting is always enjoyable. It's always enjoyable to be muted by you. You're not muted! Other people that are...
Ian MalcolmRight now I'm going to mute you for a second to tell you that there were other people who were non-co-hosts who were clearly involved in the conversation talking about how you refused to come off of mute. It's not difficult. Just hit the button.
Speaker 7Well, then you know what? Then maybe the censor is off.
Ian MalcolmWho do you think is in charge of censorship on X, Yitz?
Speaker 7No, I'm saying... Maybe it's my device.
Ian MalcolmYitz, can you tell us again, Jews are more represented per capita at Hasidic schools or the other non-Jewish schools? What do you think?
Speaker 7Per capita? Well, I mean, the Haredim are only about, like, what, 10% of this country? So the majority of Jews actually go to public schools.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no. That's not what we're asking here yet. Of the private schools, do you think per capita there's more Jews at the Hasidic schools, the other Jewish schools, or at the private schools? Which one do you think has the most Jews in it?
Speaker 7Well, what do you mean by other Jewish schools?
Ian MalcolmIt's up in the nest. It's broken down amongst Hasidic schools, other Jewish private schools, and then non-Jewish private schools. And you can take a look at the funny little box. It's the thing. They look like almost fish swimming in the ocean. You can take a look at the images there. If you need, I can try to explain it to you and to tell you what it's exactly trying to present.
Ian MalcolmDo you want to take a wild guess what we can derive from that infographic?
Speaker 7Well, I'm scrolling down. I don't see it at the moment. No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmScroll up. The word up means you go. And this can be tough because to go up, you actually have to scroll with your thumb down. I know it's kind of counterintuitive. But if you do that, you're going to see it at the top.
Speaker 7I have recent comments put on, so you think it would show up?
Ian MalcolmOkay, it's up there at Academic Agent. Again, scroll all the way up. It's kind of weird, but you need to drag your finger across the screen, or if you're on a computer, you might need to use the mouse thing, and you can spin the wheel. Okay, there you go. You got it.
Speaker 7You're figuring it out. Can you post it again?
Ian MalcolmNo, I can't put it up again, because now I'm just shocked at how remarkably incompetent you are with this application.
Speaker 7Well, it's not shown.
Ian MalcolmYitz, Yitz, the first thing that you need to do, Yitz, Yitz, take your eyeballs and open them really wide like you're... Oh, okay, okay, okay, okay. You found it.
Speaker 7Yeah, you need to open your eyes. I thought it was in the comments. No, it was in the nest.
@uncutspeechJust give me a range.
Speaker 7Okay, so this is a list of all the places we were kicked out of.
Ian MalcolmYou were kicked out of the non-Hasidic schools?
Speaker 7No, no, this is a list.
Ian MalcolmI don't know if that was a joke, but if so, that was fantastic. If it wasn't, it's even better.
Speaker 15So right now, he's looking at the third item in the nest. He needs to go two over to the left. You're looking at the expulsion listed.
Speaker 7Okay, so here it is, academic agent.
@uncutspeechWow, yes, there you go. Good job, Yitz. Academic agent, that is the one. There you go. Holy fuck. All right, we got there. I second the question. How old is this kid?
Ian MalcolmYitz, did you go to a Hasidic school? It's tough for me to even pronounce that one. You did not. Did you go to another Jewish school?
Speaker 7I'm Reformed. I grew up Reformed. You Reformed. Okay. Hebrew school.
Ian MalcolmYou went to Hebrew school. Okay. Are the ideas of scrolling or swiping, are those difficult for you?
Speaker 7No, no. Well, I mean, I never really, you know, I'm new to X basis. So, you know.
Speaker 12If you say scroll to him, he's getting ready to unfurl one.
Ian MalcolmYitz, on a scale of 1 to 10, how curly is your hair?
Speaker 7I'm not going to answer that question.
Ian MalcolmThat's a fair response. So, clearly, as we see, the other... Yitz, I can appreciate the humor that you bring to the space. So, just really quickly, per capita, we've established that Hasidic and Jewish schools are going to have more Jews. Given that, why do you think they underperform in standardized testing relative to non-Jews?
Speaker 7Well... I don't think they have more... Like I said, the Haredi population is about 10% in Israel and in America. In Israel, it's a little bit higher, about 15% to 20% if you count all the children. And of course, we're talking about children going to school. The majority of Jews go to public schools, not UC vote.
Ian MalcolmYeah, but do you think the majority of the students who go to Hasidic school or other private Jewish schools, do you think it's safe to say that that's roughly 100% Jewish population?
Speaker 7Oh, yes.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so why then... If there's such a high IQ, why do you think that Jews in those private Jewish institutions underperform relative to other private schools that might be Catholic or Christian?
Speaker 7So here's what's interesting, because what I've read is that it says the opposite.
Ian MalcolmWell, the data is right in front of you, isn't it, Yitz?
Speaker 7Yes, I'm looking at that data.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so looking at that data, what would you suggest about the IQ, prospectively, of those students?
Speaker 7Well, like I also said, they don't study math. They don't study a lot of what we would study in public school.
Ian MalcolmThat is actually fair. So let me ask you a question. Is it weird that institutions like finance and banking, which involve numbers, are not things that you focus on in those schools?
Speaker 7Yeah, I mean, you see what they focus mostly on.
Ian MalcolmSo just out of curiosity, if we could come to the conclusion that perhaps IQ is a myth, and simultaneously that there's not a large focus on mathematics, how do you think it is that this group of people might rise to the ranks of all these banking institutions?
Speaker 7Well, okay, first off, it's not the Hasidic Jews who are wise.
Ian MalcolmNo, but it is likely the other Jews that are in private Jewish schools. Is that fair?
Speaker 7Let's go to the public schools.
Ian MalcolmNo, let's not go to the public schools. Let's focus on the other private Jewish schools.
Speaker 7Actually, Ian, your argument proves my point for me. No, I don't think it does. No, no, no. I don't think you understand. You're saying the Hasidic schools are doing bad because they have lack of education.
@uncutspeechYou say, okay, all right then, fine, we can do that one. The position here, because I don't think you understand what's happening, right? The position is that, okay, you say they don't do math and science and all of these things that are very important to do things that you said they are represented in and they are overrepresented in because of their achievements, like, you know, technology and things like this.
@uncutspeechSo it's like, okay, on one hand, they don't do math. On the other hand, they're computer scientists and invented all this important stuff and medicine and stuff and things, right? That's the problem, right? Don't you get it? No, no, no. Don't you get it? Do you get it?
Speaker 7The non-Horedium are not going to be the next Lehman Brothers at the banks. They're not going to be the next Golden Sacks. What happened to the Lehman Brothers banks? Maybe they weren't so good at math. Are they still around?
Speaker 7Didn't they collapse? It was 2008.
Speaker 14But they're high IQ Jews, German Jews, reformists like you.
Speaker 7What happened? Listen, just because you have a high IQ doesn't mean you're always going to be successful.
Ian MalcolmHe literally used the example that ruined the mortgage crisis and begot all of the disaster. This is unbelievable, man.
Speaker 13Who was running AIG when they needed a bailout? Who was the CEO there?
Speaker 7You tell me.
Speaker 13Maurice Greenberg? Sound Jewish to you?
Speaker 7Greenberg can sometimes be a German name too.
Speaker 13But he wasn't. He was Jewish. But he could have been. Truth, he could have been. It could be German.
Speaker 15It's Polish. I mean, no one's going to deny that Jews do come with the comedy and the humor, right?
Ian MalcolmI mean, it's what we basically concluded is that the supposed high IQ of the Jews does not demonstrate in the private Jewish institutions in New York because they don't focus on mathematics, which you then denied by pointing to Lehman Brothers, which fell apart as a result of the mortgage crisis because they were taking all of the securities and
Ian Malcolmlumping them together and nobody was noticing the obvious fraud in that except, oh, I don't know, the guy who called out the big short for what it's worth. So we've walked through that. We've walked through the opiate crisis and the Sackler family. Where else would you like to point to suggest this supposed high Jewish IQ and that they don't control everything after you've now acknowledged that they do?
Ian MalcolmWould you just maybe concede, Yitz, that you've... perhaps not only demonstrated that they do now own and control all these things, but also might not be all that capable, and as a result might be, I don't know, overseeing the downfall of the Western world, which is kind of my overarching thesis, along with Truth and a lot of the other folks that are up here.
Speaker 7So, Ian, let's go. Can we go through some facts about Israel real quick? No, we can't.
Ian MalcolmWe're going to stick on the Western world, and I want to answer the question from you, Yitz. Has the world gotten better or worse? In the last 30 or 40 years.
Speaker 7You have to give us examples of your success. So let me give you an example of your success.
Speaker 18Oh, boy. I'm sorry. I'm really, really sorry to jump in here. And Israel, congratulations. I'm a big guy up here with a dartboard.
Speaker 10What happened to country?
Speaker 13Is Steve Hoffman also a German guy or is he a Jewish guy? The guy that got busted at Tower Financial for running a $500 million Ponzi scheme. He's also pretty good with numbers too, right Yitz?
Speaker 7Yeah, and he did a Ponzi scheme and he was successful.
Speaker 13Was he the only Jew to get caught doing a Ponzi scheme? Was he just another exception or were there others as well?
Speaker 7Jews, non-Jews, Italians.
Speaker 13How about Michael Milken? Was he Jewish? I mean, look, look, Bernie Madoff. Thank you for bringing up that example. So what do Bernie Madoff, Michael Milken, and Steve Hoffenberg and the Lehman Brothers all have in common?
Speaker 7They did bad things. And what else?
Speaker 13Like the Sackler family, they're the evil ones.
Speaker 7How about the Sassoon family?
Speaker 13Wait, just a sec. How about the Sassoon family, which had the biggest opium empire in the world for over 100 years? Truth, they did bad stuff. They're just evil too, right? Yes.
Speaker 7Listen, this is the difference. I never claimed that we're perfect.
Speaker 13Hey, I'm a slow guy. I can't keep up with your fast, high IQ Jews. Wait a minute. The Sassoon family, were they just evil? Were they just evil too? And the Qaduri family as well, the Ilyas family as well, those Baghdadi Jewish families that run the Opium Empire? They made billions of dollars of profits, which then enabled them to buy banks and insurance companies and also finance opium dens in China.
Speaker 13Were they just evil people for over 100 years?
Speaker 7That was the British Empire. That wasn't you.
Speaker 13Oh, that was the British Empire. Tell me, what was the British Empire in 1834 when David Sassoon moved there with his family and his eight sons to go create that empire out of India, by the way, in Calcutta and in various cities in India where they were exporting opium into China? controlled all the trade routes too, by the way.
Speaker 13But then when they got into trouble and caused an opium war because China pushed back and wanted to liberate their country from these evil Jews, that's when they financed and called upon, not the British Empire, but the British Army to come and help them to defeat the Chinese. So they paid the British Army to come and help them when they couldn't defeat the Chinese themselves because they were killing Chinese people with opium addiction.
Speaker 13And they did it not once but twice. There were two opium wars. If that wasn't enough, then the Jews imported communism as well 100 years later in the 1920s through Israel.
Speaker 8And it backfired on us.
Speaker 13It backfired. How did it backfire on them if they were able to stay in China, also become major landowners in China, and also, well, start up the biggest bank in China called, maybe you've heard of this one, HSBC. That's right. The Sassoon family and Kaduri family launched HSBC. Did you know that?
Speaker 7Okay, so you mentioned communism. Communism backfired.
Speaker 13No, I didn't. We got to communism after. Sorry, I lumped in two topics and you forgot about the first one. So I'll remind you. You were talking about the opiates. Were the Sassoon family just evil people who did 100 years of, well, drug exporting and killing people through opium addiction for over 100 years? Or is it just part of the Jewish customs to go and do that sort of thing to wipe people out?
Speaker 13Because now we've talked about the Sackler family. We can talk about Albert Borla, too, if you want, or Tal Sachs. over at Moderna. But how about also the Sassoon family, which built up the biggest opium empire in the world?
Speaker 7You people are so obsessed with us. Maybe because we all chose them.
@uncutspeechJust call us goy.
Speaker 7I prefer that over you people.
Speaker 13Can I ask him a question? It's jealousy. I didn't realize it all the time. I, too, could be a drug dealer and make billions of dollars killing people. Is that what I'm jealous of, Yitz?
Speaker 7Yeah, well, why do you obsess over all of us? Wait, wait, wait.
Ian MalcolmHang on, hang on, hang on. And we're going to go to Gen Z in a second. So, Yitz, I'm going to play an interesting game with you. Because if a group of people was wonderful, it would be very easy to continuously present additional examples of them being wonderful. So what I want you to do is I want you to give me the name of a Jew who you believe has been a wonderful contributor to society.
Ian MalcolmOkay? And what you should do is just give a name and then a one-sentence explanation on why they're wonderful. That's all I want. Then I'm going to go to Truth Teller. And he's going to provide a Jew who did something disastrous for society with a one-sentence explanation. Then we're going to go back to you, Yitz, and we're going to go back and forth and see who is able to do that for a longer period of time.
Ian MalcolmBecause, Yitz, I'm convinced that you won't be able to get through more than four or five people. before you get to one where truth can say, actually, he did all these terrible things. Maybe I'm wrong, but we're going to see. So Yitz, you get to start off here with the first valley. Can you name a Jew who did some wonderful things for the world?
Ian MalcolmAgain, one name, and then an explanation in a simple sentence.
Speaker 7Easy.
@uncutspeechI think he's about to say Freud.
Ian MalcolmYitz, I don't know if you're double muted, but you're not currently muted.
Ian MalcolmYou don't have to hit the hand thing.
Speaker 7Okay. I was muted again. You know, you want to try to make it look like I'm Googling.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, we're not. We're not doing it. Nobody's doing that.
Speaker 7Here's a name. Here's a great name for all you. Okay. Go for it. And trust me, I don't have to Google that. So anything. Jesus.
Ian MalcolmOkay. Okay. So the very, okay. So, so yes, you can say have fun. No, no, that's fine. That's fine. No, no, yes, yes. You can say that. That's totally fine. So you've got Jesus Christ. Hang on. Pause. So the first person that you name is literally a Christian, which is just fantastic. It's the person that absolutely outright rejected everything that is Judaism.
Speaker 8He was Jewish. He was Jewish.
Ian MalcolmYou can suggest that, but he could not, from a principle standpoint, have more rejected the very thing that you're suggesting. But that's fine.
@uncutspeechEven from a genetic point of view, his genetics wouldn't look at all anything similar to definitely any Ashkenazi Jews, and it's extremely doubtful that he would have any similar genetics to any sort of Jews today, even Sephardic or Mizrahi or anything like that. We're talking about essentially a completely different ethnic group here anyway.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no. Thank you for going for JC. It's the perfect personification because, again, the very first person that you go with is the antithesis of Judaism and is the personification of Christianity, which is, oh, I don't know, named after him. But let's go to Truth. Truth, can you give me one individual of Jewish ethnicity who's been an absolute stain or scourge on the planet?
Speaker 13Sure. Leon Trotsky was absolutely a scourge on the planet because he led the Red Army into Russia through the Judeo-Bolshevik invasion that ended up killing over 100 million primarily Orthodox Russian Christians, destroyed over 49,000 churches, killed over 200,000 pastors, priests, etc., wiped out all of Russia's wealth that had accumulated up until 1917.
Speaker 13And also they stole all the gold. That was part of the deal after, of course, killing the Tsar and his entire family through Jewish ritualistic fashion to then steal the gold to make up for what Jacob Schiff had financed to the tune of $20 million, along with what, of course, Max Warburg and Armand Hammer and other Jewish financiers had spent and invested into this Jewish army to go and invade Russia.
Speaker 13So Leon Trotsky was 100% Jewish. I mean, Vladimir Lenin, early enough, he was only part Jewish, but they, of course, worked together.
Speaker 9He was a quarter.
Speaker 13I know. I know he was a quarter on his mom's grandfather's side. I get it. That's fine. But I said Leon Trotsky. Was Leon Trotsky Jewish?
Speaker 8Yes.
Ian MalcolmAll right. So perfect. Yitz, so we've got your first suggestion of a great Jew who begot Christianity. And then we've got Truth Teller coming back with a Jew who was responsible prospectively for as many as 100 million deaths and the destruction of the Russian Empire. So Yitz, who is your second wonderful Jew?
Speaker 19Wait, wait a second. I want to hear Yitz tell us what was great about Jesus.
Speaker 7Oh, yes, yes. Oh, yeah. Perfect.
Speaker 19I mean, first of all, does what is great about Jesus preclude him from being in hell?
Speaker 7Let's not go there today.
Speaker 19No, no, no. You think that he went there. I don't want to go there. I don't plan on going there.
Ian MalcolmIt's the cleansing place, David.
Speaker 19It's funny that you say, let's not go there, because the person you picked is someone that Christians admire. And the reason why they admire him is mutually exclusive to everything you believe. Now, this is your chance to talk like a snake, which of course is normal. Tell us why he's not in hell. Go.
Speaker 7Okay, because that Jesus is a Yeshu from, he lived a century earlier. He had five disciples. He died by stoning. He had a completely different story.
@uncutspeechNo, I'm going to stop this right now because this fucking, you people don't understand that Christians can just go read your books too. The Yeshu that's described in the Talmud, right? Like why is his mother's name Mary then? Okay. Why was he described as a sorcerer? Why was he described whenever he did all of these miracles as a wizard?
@uncutspeechAnd whenever we talk, whenever we talk about, and when we talk about stoning, uh, it doesn't say that he was stoned. We, it's, it says specifically in the Talmud that they were, that they wanted to stone him, but that they couldn't. And that makes sense because it was, they ended up having, they ended up crucifying. They described his mother, Mary described her as a whore.
@uncutspeechRight. Um, I hate even saying that. Yeah, this depiction that he was stoned, no, the Jews don't even say that he was stoned. They wanted to stone him, but then the Romans crucified him. So you don't even, again, you don't know your own history.
Speaker 7No.
@uncutspeechYou just think, silly, go ahead and read my Talmud.
Speaker 7Look, look, even if it happened, who cares? I care. I care a lot. You just lied.
@uncutspeechYou just came in, you bold-faced lied, when you know for a fact that even your own Jewish scholars, the minority of them, they all agree that Yeshua in the Talmud, that is Jesus. Very few of them even dispute this. No mainstream scholars, that's for sure, and no rabbis.
Speaker 7Rabbi Shmuley Bateach disputes it.
@uncutspeechRabbi Shmuley doesn't believe it.
Ian MalcolmWait, are you going to suggest Rabbi Shmuley is your second good Jew that you want to talk about?
@uncutspeechNo, no. You just said... You're going to say that? Rabbi Shmuley, the dildo salesman, is a representative of Judaism?
Speaker 7Dildo dealer, the dildo dealer.
Ian MalcolmI gave you a name. Let's go to your second chosen chosen. Can you choose a chosen for the chosen exercise?
Speaker 7Here's a second example. Yes, he also has a dark history as well, but what he did was so powerful that it should be remembered as well as a good legacy. So his name is Furch Habel. He invented synthetic fertilizer, which is responsible for half of the world's population alive today.
Speaker 19I feel like you're inventing some of that now.
Speaker 7No, listen, listen. For example, if you have any siblings... That laugh confirmed it. If you have any siblings, pretend they don't exist for a moment because 4 billion people would not exist without his invention. So how many people, just out of curiosity, Yitz, how many people were genocided under communism?
Speaker 7I thought we were talking about... No, we are.
Ian MalcolmI'm just suggesting that hundreds of millions of people, perspectively, if you include Russia and China, have died under that ideology, which, you know, it might... Unfortunately, it won't counterbalance the fertilizer. You're suggesting four billion people on the planet. What's the dark side there, Yitz, you mentioned?
Speaker 7Well, you know that what he did was World War I, inventing the gas.
Ian MalcolmAh, yes, I did. And who invented the mobile gas chamber, for what it's worth?
Speaker 7It was not him.
Ian MalcolmNo, I'm not saying it was, but who was it?
Speaker 7The Nazis.
Ian MalcolmAh, was it the Nazi? Truth teller, do you want to jump in on that one?
Speaker 13All right, sure. It was Davidovich Berg, who was a Soviet Jew, who invented the mobile gas chamber in 1936, and he was using it to kill Russians. while transporting them to the gulag. So what they did is they connected a tube to the exhaust pipe of the truck that they were in, and then the fumes, of course, would go into the chamber that they created to kill off those who were inside.
Speaker 13And if they didn't get killed that way, they'd end up shooting them dead or just enslaving them in the gulag where they were essentially brutalized.
Speaker 7So how did the Nazis get it? How did the Nazis get it?
Speaker 13Well, the Nazis never used gas chambers because they didn't expect it.
Speaker 7Okay, listen. Let's not even go there.
Speaker 13Wait, just a sec. So it's Dr. It was David of H. Berg, a Soviet Jew who invented the mobile gas chamber in 1936. However, what the Russian Jews did, the Soviet Jews did is they will tell them every accusation is a confession. So they white people out through gas chambers. Then they accuse the National Socialists of doing which they never did.
Speaker 7OK, and you're the great.
Speaker 13By the way, do you know which Jew came up with chemical weapons to be able to kill people as well? That was Dr. Mayerovsky. Do you know what his nickname was? He was also a Soviet Jew. He was Dr. Death because he did human experimentation and wiped out a bunch of Russians that he was experimenting with.
Speaker 7Dr. Mengele.
Speaker 13Dr. Mengele never did that. It was Dr. Mayerovsky who was a Soviet Jew who did that. Once again, Soviet Jews just blame the National Socialists for the crimes they commit themselves.
Speaker 7Okay, oh yeah, okay. A bunch of bullshit, basically. All right, hang on.
Ian MalcolmI'm going to mute you, Yitz. But hey, look, I appreciate that you gave both the light and the dark side of your example. Kind of curious that the guy that you came up with invents fertilizer, but also weapons of death. Which brings us to Mr. Truthteller for a chance to perhaps give us some information about another nefarious piece of this little group of people.
Ian MalcolmAnd then we'll go back to Yitz for a positive one.
Speaker 17Sure.
Speaker 18I have a very short question. When the Germans used gas on the Jews, why didn't they use the actual nerve gas that they had thousands of tons of, but used a pesticide?
Speaker 7Because they found Zyklon B to be superior. That was the gas. That's what they used. Eight to ten grams per kilo could kill a human.
Speaker 18no no that's that's that's just because um it basically only gives a rash and you have you have to use such high doses why would you why would you um exchange that for an actual nerve gas that would kill within seconds
Speaker 7Right, Zyklon B was able to do the job. That's what they wanted to use.
Ian MalcolmAll right, well, we'll leave it there just because it's a contentious issue, not denying any events or anything along those lines. But Mr. Truthteller, let's go back to you for another esteemed member of this community and some of the crimes.
Speaker 13Sure. How about Al Goldstein, who was a pioneer in pornography, who stated that the reason why, yes, there's so many Jews in pornography is because they hate Christianity. They hate Jesus Christ. They hate Christian culture, and therefore they use porn as their opportunity to be able to defile Christian women. And based on their own statistics in the 1980s, the majority of the pornography actors who were men were Jewish.
Speaker 13The majority of the women were Roman Catholic females, as the Jews wanted, because they were the ones, of course, who were the mass producers, distributors of pornography. Ruben Sherman, another Jew, of course, was the one who was essentially the godfather of pornography. And then your friend, hold on, your friend Ron Jeremy, of course, who was considered the king of porn.
Speaker 13He, of course, had fantasies as a young boy of, of course, screwing a lot of Roman Catholic women. And that's why he became a porn star, even though he had both a bachelor's and master's degree. And he was a teacher at one time.
Speaker 7Funny that you didn't mention who Hefner was.
Speaker 13people who have their wouldn't exist either with larry flint so i'll just throw that one at you too without room instrument who control the distribution production of all pornography so both if you have their and larry flint had to pay tribute in taxes to ruin sherman without which they would have no porn and and truth how was it even able to be sold because i think it wasn't too long ago that was a band's commodity in the west correct that's a good one so samuel roth another well jew of course
Speaker 13He fought for the right to legalize pornography in 1957 through his landmark lawsuit, which then redefined what an obscenity is. Because back then, before 1957, everybody understood obscenity to be, say, nudity or sexual conduct in public. But Jews redefined that so that, you know, judges or normal layman people wouldn't be able to have that ability to discern that.
Speaker 13Now they put it in the hands, of course, of the viewers. Hang on, hang on, hang on.
Ian MalcolmHere's what we're going to do. We're going to blend this up a little bit. It's going to be your turn to present a good character here from this story. But the way that I'm going to do it to make it a little more interesting in the event that you've been building a list over on your end while Truth's been giving his answers, I'm going to go down and actually you can pick a member of the speaker panel so it doesn't seem like this is orchestrated.
Ian MalcolmYou're going to pick somebody that's up here as a speaker. They're going to give you a letter and then you need to come up with a person from your community whose name begins with that letter that you think is an admirable character to discuss and why you think they're admirable. So pick one of the people here on the panel and they'll give you a letter.
Speaker 7Okay, well, first off, I wanted to say, no orthodox rabbi would ever be an advocate for porn. So, that's number one. So, you know, you could say there's a cycle of people.
Speaker 20Rabbi Shmuley was your fucking example.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. Rabbi Solomon Friedman is an orthodox rabbi, and he's the partner in Equitable Capital Partners, his own porn hub, and 14 other porn websites. So, wait a minute. Do you know what his mandate was? It was to clean up the porn industry. He was such a huge advocate of cleaning up the porn industry that he bought into it.
Speaker 13And besides this, do you know what he does in his spare time as a criminal lawyer? He advises other criminal lawyers on how to get reduced sentences for other pedophiles because so many pedophiles are Jews. So he's an Orthodox rabbi that owns a bunch of porn sites, profits from those porn sites. And you know what's on these porn sites?
Speaker 13Child pornography. That's right. Hundreds of thousands of posts. Well, then he'd be in jail.
Speaker 13That's a minor detail. You just said rabbis would never authorize or condone pornography. I just gave you the example of ordained rabbi Solomon Friedman.
Speaker 7I'm going to look him up.
Ian MalcolmAll right, you can look him up. Now, Yitz, pick a member of the panel here, Yitz, and they'll give you a letter. Pick somebody, anybody.
Speaker 7Okay, well, I wanted to make a statement real quick. Here's Solomon Friedman. But I wanted to make a statement. I was going to pick David, but I also wanted to make a statement real quick for David. David, I think it was two days ago, and I'll debate real quickly. You went on earlier, and I clipped this, by the way. You were saying that you basically said you don't care if all the children in Gaza die as long as you don't pay for it.
Speaker 7I thought that was interesting, and I wanted to mention it last time. But go ahead. Yes, it is true, and I have the evidence. But go ahead.
Speaker 20obviously everybody knows that I have no ideology and that what really, really the worst thing about what the Israelis are doing is killing those kids.
Speaker 19And so if I gave you that impression, I want to tell you right now that I would really look for almost any solution for them to stop murdering kids. So peace and equanimity is right up there with free speech for me, anti-war peace and equanimity. Everybody knows this. So if you've got some impression, otherwise, I want to tell you right now, those two things are the most important.
Speaker 19The idea that genocide is okay. And this othering, we can't not notice this now. We now notice that Jewish supremacists view us as an other group of people that they're happy to exterminate. They just don't care at all. You know, I tell people this about Zelensky. You'll never understand Zelensky until you understand that he views both sides as his enemy.
Speaker 19And when you see every member of our civilization that's important, you see our Attorney General going over there and schmoozing it up with Zelensky, our Secretary of Treasury, our Homeland Defense, all of the people that have no business over there. all just really with grins like the Cheshire Cat, enjoying this mass extermination of the goyim.
Speaker 19And what are we saying? We've had enough. We've had enough of your killing. You know, you're always accused of being money-grubbing and greedy. You know, that's all well and good. But the idea that you won't settle for just washing your money, you have to wash it in the blood of the goyim. That's what we're sick of. The idea that so many of...
Speaker 19So much of the literature, the anti-white literature, is preponderantly written by Jews. You know, clearly you guys hate us. You have a genocidal contempt for us. And by the way, I view us equal across the board. I believe all humans have the divine spark. So I have very little in common with Palestinians. Culturally, everything.
Speaker 19But I don't want little children to be slaughtered. So this is very important to me. Like, I'm really sincere about this. I don't want to... I don't just get off on making you feel bad. I don't want you to kill children. I mean, it's as simple as that. And the idea that you guys just revel in it. You know, a lot of people, if they kill one person, they will, they'll have, you know, shame is the last vestige of virtue and they'll feel bad about it.
Speaker 19And for the rest of their life, the weight of that, they'll carry it with them. But then there's a Ted Bundy type where they get off on it and they like it. And they lose that last message of virtue. And from then on, for them, it becomes a strength that they're so willing to kill people. They're morally flexible so that they can bend in any direction.
Speaker 19And that's what we're accusing you of. And we have the receipts to back it up.
Speaker 7So here's what's interesting, David. If you want to kill non-Jews, the goyim so much, how come the Jewish community in America is such high intermarriage rates that they call it the Solent Holocaust? Can you explain that?
Ian MalcolmActually, do you think it might have anything to do with the physiognomy of Jewish individuals? Do you think perhaps they want to be able to pursue the romantic interests of non-Jews?
Speaker 7Yeah.
Ian MalcolmWait, you do? You just acknowledge that?
Speaker 7If I understood your question correctly, many Jews intermarry with non-Jews.
Ian MalcolmAnd they find them perhaps more romantically appealing than fellow Jews. Is that right?
Speaker 7Oh, I don't know about that. Do you think that could explain it perhaps?
Speaker 7Well, why else? I think people like diversity. People like diversity.
Ian MalcolmBut Yitz, I mean, by your own suggestion that the Jews are quote-unquote silent holocausting themselves by going out and wanting to reproduce with non-Jews, what might that say about the aesthetics of the Jewish people?
Speaker 7Here's what I think it is. If you live in Israel and you're surrounded by Jews as a majority, you're going to marry Jews.
Ian MalcolmThat's not any kind of indication of their aesthetics. That's just the reality of being stuck with a group of people.
Speaker 13Jews don't look at this. That's actually still not true, because if you look at the Haredi community, such as in New York, or with Left Tahor, for instance, do they marry non-Jews?
Speaker 7Let's not even mention Left Tahor. That's a sick community.
Speaker 13But they're Jewish, aren't they? What do they do, Yitz? Do they marry non-Jews?
Speaker 7I don't know what they do. I don't, I don't, I don't know what they do.
Speaker 13I don't want the boss. Pregnancies and human trafficking in the U S by the way. Also, of course, in Mexico and Guatemala.
Speaker 7Hopefully they're all caught.
Speaker 19Okay. I'll give you your letter. You ready for your letter?
Ian MalcolmLet's go to the letter. Here you go. Yes.
Speaker 19I'm actually going to give him a softball here. Yes.
Ian MalcolmAll right. Yes. Come on. King Solomon. King Solomon. Okay, tell us about King Solomon and his greatness. And then Yitz, you get to pick the letter for Mr. Truth Teller.
@uncutspeechTell us what he was doing in his temple. Are we going to count pre-Talmudic Jews? Isn't it wild? He's now gone to Christ and King Solomon. It's like all of these people who didn't believe in any of the second temple traditions. Nobody says you don't, Yitz.
Ian MalcolmWe're all saying that's a reasonable claim. So give us your thoughts on King Solomon. And then you can give truth teller a letter.
Speaker 7He was a wise king. He built the first temple.
Ian MalcolmAll right. He built the first temple. All right. Let's give truth teller your suggestion. He actually built that temple.
Speaker 19Not to help him out, but I was leading him.
@uncutspeechWhat happened? And how wise was Solomon? How wise was Solomon? What exactly happened again? What was the story of King Solomon? Do you know?
Speaker 18He was so wise that he enslaved 30,000 Israelites. No, he did not. No, no, no.
Speaker 7No, no, he did not enslave fellow Jews.
@uncutspeechYeah, I don't care about the enslavement.
Speaker 7Wait, isn't it interesting you said he didn't enslave fellow Jews? How curious was that? He didn't enslave anyone.
Ian MalcolmI didn't enslave, so we're changing it to he didn't enslave anybody.
Speaker 7Say again?
Speaker 18I said he enslaved 30,000 Israelites.
@uncutspeechWe don't care about enslaving the Israelites, really. That's kind of besides the point. The question that I'm asking him here, right? He said Solomon is an example. Like Solomon lost the throne because of his disobedience to God and having all these wives and doing all of this degenerate stuff. This is the point that I'm making here.
@uncutspeechYour great example here is someone that God made an example of being disobedient.
Ian MalcolmBut isn't it interesting that he threw out five versions of degeneracy and the only one you negated is that he didn't lose the throne. Do you want to make any claims on the other pieces?
Speaker 7He had multiple wives. You know what's intellectual.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. Was that like two or three wives? How many wives did he have?
Speaker 7We don't know. The text exaggerates. That's one thing about the Bible.
Speaker 13Okay, well, what's an under-exaggeration? Give us a conservative ballpark.
Speaker 7I have no idea.
@uncutspeechYou could say 10% and it would still be fucking bananas. It would still be like 70.
Speaker 7Is it over 10? It could be under 10.
@uncutspeechwell it could be but it was not a single door says anything close to the under ten like not even close like you can say maybe they were exaggerating a bit and it's not seven hundred it's not three like you can maybe say that but to say that every source says it's hundreds but it's gotta be under ten i've got no sources for no evidence but yet it's gotta be under that doesn't even make sense you're telling me that you're telling me that the most powerful man in the region at the time had under ten wives interesting
@uncutspeechAnd God condemned him for keeping it nice and... I mean, dude, you don't know the story of Solomon, do you?
Speaker 7No, no, no. Here's what's interesting. Do you know the story of King Manasseh?
Ian MalcolmNo, let's stick with Solomon here. Stay focused.
Speaker 7No, no, no. Because here's what's interesting. King Manasseh, he sacrificed his own children to Moloch. His own children. He had all kinds of idols in the temple.
@uncutspeechAnd what happened to him?
Speaker 7No, it was his children. And what happened to him? He was sent in exile to Babylon. And when he was in Babylon, he made tshuva. He prayed to his son. He said, God, forgive me. I'm a terrible person. And I want to be forgiven. Why didn't you take this fellow over Solomon? And what happened? God forgave him for all sins.
Speaker 7Why didn't you take him over Solomon? You told Solomon. I don't know. Now you've got to pivot to another guy. Isn't it interesting? Not one blood sacrifice had to be given on his behalf. God just forgave him just like that. Isn't that interesting?
@uncutspeechActually, it's not. I don't find it. And I don't know what your point even is, actually, if you want me to be honest.
Speaker 13My point is... Solomon, sorry, Yitz, why didn't you answer how many wives Solomon has? Why did you lie?
Speaker 7Because it's irrelevant.
Ian MalcolmHang on, Yitz, since you're talking about Babylon, where did the Talmud come out of, apparently, again?
Speaker 7It came out of Jews who lived in Babylon.
Ian MalcolmAh, isn't that weird?
Speaker 7Actually, there was a Jerusalem Talmud as well.
Ian MalcolmYeah, but kind of crazy. You're talking about Babylon, all the disaster and the degeneracy and the evil, and out of it comes this book, and you people are like, that's the one we subscribe to. Not the guy who came before that.
Speaker 7Actually, you can't have the Talmud without the Torah.
@uncutspeechYou ever find it interesting that your temple got rebuilt and all those new traditions that became oral tradition then got codified into the Talmud later? You ever find that interesting that that was right after Babylonian captivity?
Speaker 7You ever think about that timeline at all? Let me tell you something. It's not as extensive as many Orthodox Jews would like to believe, but there are some mitzvot, some halakha, some rituals from the Talmud that you can find in archaeology. You can go the whole way to the Dead Sea Scrolls. So, for example, we have Tefillin, you know, Orthodox Jews, you know, put on Tefillin, the prayer straps.
Speaker 7We find on the end of Dead Sea Scrolls, long before the Second Temple was destroyed, the exact everything, the boxes, the leather straps.
Speaker 13Even the pros, everything matches the opinion of Rossi.
Speaker 19Let's stay serious. I think in the interest of staying serious, I'm suggesting this to all of you, stick within the last 500 years where the historical record is a lot more clear. Because we're sort of getting into the sort of almost mythological.
Ian MalcolmBut David, over half of the characters that Yitz has had to... bring out here for his examples of the good Jews. I was wondering if he was going to say Gilgamesh.
Speaker 19I mean, how far do you have to go back?
Ian MalcolmSo Yitz, it's your turn to give Truth Teller a letter here. And you don't have to throw him a softball. David gave you a pretty easy one with S. You can go...
Speaker 19I wanted him to say Spinoza, by the way. I was going to back him up on that, but you know.
Speaker 7Spinoza's a great example. With all due respect, everyone, this is kind of a silly game. I mean, because it doesn't add any weight. There's no perspective.
Ian MalcolmWe'll play fastball because you don't like the game in its current rendition. Maybe it's not enough airtime for you. So here's what we're going to do. I want you to name an individual whose name begins with the letter I'm going to give you. Just fire it out. Rapid fire. The good Jew. And at any point, truth or you can jump in and say, wait a second.
Ian MalcolmSo Yitz, give me a good Jew whose name begins with an F. No, that's a silly.
Speaker 7No, no, no. Give me one. I can say Feinstein. I can say Feinstein. Which Feinstein?
Ian MalcolmYou're talking about Diane?
Speaker 7He's an Orthodox. Orthodox. Which Feinstein are you going to? Look, look, look, look, look. This is a silly game. Why wouldn't you say Richard Feynman? Or Bobby Fischer? Well, Richard Feynman's a good... Well, Bobby Fischer was kind of a capo. He was kind of anti-Semitic. But Richard Feynman is a great example.
Speaker 14Why was he anti-Semitic? Why did he say there's anti-Semitic?
@uncutspeechYeah, I mean, here's the thing, too.
Speaker 14Isn't Bobby Fischer high IQ, though? Yeah, he's a great favorite. But he was mentally ill.
@uncutspeechHe was mentally ill. Okay, hold on, hold on. He was mentally ill, okay, but what does that take away from his achievements, right?
Speaker 13Like, you just say, we ask you, like, high-achieving... A mentally ill guy won the World Chess Championship 11 years in a row? How does a mentally ill guy beat some of the smartest guys in the world? It's schizophrenic.
Speaker 7I think he became mentally ill a little bit later on.
Speaker 13Is there a common trend for mental deficiency with Ashkenazi Jews? Truth isn't it interesting?
Ian MalcolmHe was 185 IQ and a global chess champion, one of the smartest people on the planet, and he was like, hey, I think Jews are a problem. Oh, no, mental illness. Forget about all the Jews.
Speaker 7Here's what's interesting, everyone. You know, you point out...
Speaker 13The guy with the 185 IQ stated that Jews are an international criminal organization that are using the U.S. to achieve their own ends.
Speaker 7So first off, at least I am glad. I don't think it was 185, but I'm glad that you're admitting that. How high was the IQ?
Speaker 13Was it above 180?
Speaker 7I have no... I don't know. Was his IQ higher than yours?
Speaker 13Was his IQ higher than yours?
Speaker 7It probably was.
@uncutspeechIf he wasn't anti-Semitic, if he wasn't anti-Semitic, would it have been 185 then?
Speaker 7He wasn't anti-Semitic, he was a capo. Self-loathing, just like Karl Marx.
Ian MalcolmHey, Yitz, here's one. Can you give me a Jew that you revere whose name begins with L?
Speaker 7Listen, we're not going to play this game. Can you give me one that begins with L? It doesn't land anywhere. It doesn't lend any... Larry David! Larry David!
Speaker 15Larry David! Why not Leonid Hrabisky? He's a multi-billionaire.
Speaker 19That's D, buddy. That begins with D. I know you're up there with Bobby Fischer.
Ian MalcolmIt goes to comedy and what some might say is degeneracy or whatnot. But, I mean, look, it's in the media. Isn't it weird that you were like, oh, who can I think of that's in the TV?
Speaker 19His last name begins with D, Ian. His last name begins with D.
Speaker 13David described as neurotic, also with some mental deficiency as well, Yitz? I mean, that's the character of George Costanza, who represented who Larry David was in Seinfeld, wasn't that right?
Speaker 14Yeah, it's a character, you know, it's a sitcom.
Speaker 13So then you agree that the Jew that you think was a good person and had good impact was mentally deficient, who's neurotic, right?
Speaker 7Listen, listen, we get the point.
Ian MalcolmYitz, on a scale of 1 to 10, how attractive is the individual who portrays George Costanza?
Speaker 7Look, look, he's a great comedian. No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmOn a scale of attractiveness, I'm not suggesting that you're LGBT. You said you were not. But how attractive is George Costanza? Would he be a GQ model?
Speaker 7Listen, listen, listen. I think this is like an export.
Ian MalcolmIt's not a difficult question yet. Can you just give a number? One to ten. You don't got to be coy. It's okay.
Speaker 7He's a handsome gentleman. He's a handsome gentleman.
Ian MalcolmAt least it's over five. Hey, he gave an answer. I can respect it. Yitz, I was asking just because of that whole thing about marrying outside of their clique. If I was a woman, I would look at George Costanza. I don't think he'd be at the top of my roster of people I'd be vying to try and get the attention of. Go ahead.
@spirit__saintYou said something earlier that I actually really agree with. Is this Andy? Are you Andy? No, this is Spirit. This is Spirit. Oh, okay. You said something I actually really didn't hear earlier.
Speaker 13Like those spirits that the Bronfman used to make when they ran Seagram's, the biggest liquor distribution company in the world.
Speaker 10Oh, yeah, they're Jewish too, by the way. The cooking spirits. Marina, Marina.
@spirit__saintI actually appreciate the fact that Yitz is able to sit in here and take the heat. I respect that. And you said something, Yitz. You're a good sport. And you said something. And I wish you could bring some of your friends in here. We could talk to them. Maybe we have a group powwow. I was thinking that myself. And so invite your friends.
@spirit__saintSo Yitz, you said something earlier about how the Sackler family should be judged as individuals, not as Jews. You said that. And I think that's a fair point because we shouldn't judge the group for the crimes of the few, right? However, I'm not blaming you for the Sacklers' sins. So why do the Jews hold the German people in the same regard?
@spirit__saintby making them pay reparations for the Holocaust to this day?
Speaker 7I personally do not consider every last German today, for example, to have been involved in Husserl.
@spirit__saintBut the Jews that reap the benefits of those reparations do consider them that way. Yeah, answer his question.
Speaker 7Can you speak on that? That is for the families, people who have lost everything and don't have anything.
Speaker 19Hold on, hold on, hold on. He's asking why do they owe it? Why do they owe it? It's the German government. It's not the German people.
@spirit__saintBut the German people pay for it.
Speaker 19Right. Governments have no money. Every government in the world has exactly zero money that they don't take from their people. So remember... What you're saying is, I can't believe I'm having to explain this to you. What you're saying is the government confiscates that money from people that are living right now in order to pay people in Israel.
Speaker 19Now, he's saying morally, how can they be culpable and therefore required to pay that money unless you're judging them as a group?
Speaker 7Well, here's what's interesting. Menachem Begin was famously opposed to David Ben-Gurion and called it blood money. So he actually opposed it.
Speaker 19I'm not asking what he thought. I'm asking your opinion.
@spirit__saintBut yes, as a Jew, would you then be vocal in support of abolishing those reparations?
Speaker 7I would say once the last victim has passed on, yes, of course.
Speaker 19Hold on. You're losing the strain here, buddy.
@spirit__saintI have a follow-up. Sure. How old is the youngest victim?
Speaker 7That's a good question. Let me say about the sacrifice.
@spirit__saintHow much time do we have left? No, no, no. How old is the youngest victim of the Holocaust? How much time do we have left, honestly? It was 80 years ago.
Speaker 7Well, then it's probably not much time. But you know what?
@spirit__saintThey keep discovering more and more victims.
Speaker 7No, no, no.
Ian MalcolmCan I ask you one question on this subject? I'm not denying that anything happened or didn't happen. I'm not making any claims to that. I am kind of curious. Nope, would never do that in these rooms. But yes, I am kind of curious because sometimes I hear about individuals that survive one, two, three, four, five, six different concentration camps.
Ian MalcolmAnd if they're death camps, when I hear about that, I think like, my goodness, this is somebody that's out of, you know, American gladiators. They somehow scaled the fence and they must have avoided the tennis ball cannon and all of the other things from the gladiator zone. You know, this is straight out of the, what's the...
Ian MalcolmI can't remember what that movie is. The Hunger Games, right? How do you explain that? Do you think they were just incredibly crafty or were the Germans that were operating maybe the five concentration camps prior to them arriving in the sixth, were they just unusually nice or maybe acted differently than all the other camps?
Ian MalcolmI'm just curious for your thoughts on that.
Speaker 7Some of them were walk camps. And also I want to add that even when the last person passes on, you know, May Hassan be, may the blood be of Ant, may the memory never die.
Ian MalcolmYeah, look, and everybody that dies, we of course have empathy for. And that was an interesting answer. Okay, they were work camps, not concentration camps, which that's your words, not mine, yes.
Speaker 7No, that's not what I said. That is what you said.
Ian MalcolmThat's exactly what you just said. You said it on record when I clipped it. Yes, that was what you said. And really quickly, just to point for humor's sake, again, not denying that anything didn't happen, but for humor's sake, In the nest, what did happen is a post, Today I learned George Costanza was 29 years old when Seinfeld started.
Ian MalcolmI always assumed he was like 49 or so at the time. Thank God for not making me age like that man. So Yitz, I'm just kind of curious. Do you think that perhaps that might in any way, shape, or form play into Jewish women wanting to not date Jewish men?
Speaker 7You're just saying all Jews are ugly. That's ridiculous.
Ian MalcolmThat's not what I'm saying. I'm asking about George Costanza, who I think you brought up, if I'm not mistaken.
Speaker 7Okay, let's just move on to the next one.
Ian MalcolmIt's curious. So, Yitz, just out of curiosity, when you look up in the nest and you look at that man, if you had to guess, would you say he's more likely 29 or 49? What would you say?
Speaker 7Let me put it to you like this. If I were a lady, I'd date Ben Stiller. How tall is Ben Stiller, Yitz?
@uncutspeechOkay, he looks like a monkey. What the hell are you talking about? What's his most handsome feature? I mean... His face?
Speaker 7Look, look, look. The point is... What's more shocking, his hairline or his waistline? Now look, here's what's interesting. Here's what gets very interesting. It's about to get very disinteresting.
Speaker 7I myself am not homosexual, so I'm not going to get into that.
Ian MalcolmIf you had to guess, who can do more push-ups, you or a 29-year-old George Costanza?
Speaker 7Actually, probably him, because I'm not that athletic. Hang on.
Ian MalcolmActually, first off, I want to give you a big celebration. That's a very honest thing to say.
Ian MalcolmBut in all sincerity, if you look at George Costanza and you're like, that is a muscular man. I cannot keep up. What does that perhaps say about the Jewish people?
Speaker 7He's not representative of all the Jewish people.
Ian MalcolmWait, no, you're suggesting that he's a muscular Jewish person.
Speaker 7Look at Billy Goldberg, for example. Who? Who the fuck is that? No idea.
Speaker 7What's the law?
Ian MalcolmGoldberg. You're suggesting that Bill Goldberg is Jewish? He's on steroids. He is Jewish. Wait, is Bill Goldberg actually Jewish?
@spirit__saintYeah, he's Jewish.
Ian MalcolmWow, I never would have thought that. Okay, Bill, hey, there's a muscular Jewish guy.
Speaker 7That's a Mazel Tov. That's a Mazel Tov.
Ian MalcolmWould you say Bill Goldberg is an attractive man yet?
Speaker 7We're not talking about attractiveness.
Ian MalcolmIs Bill Goldberg the wrestler more or less attractive than 29-year-old George Costanza? Okay, listen. Let's move on to the topic.
@spirit__saintI have a follow-up question for Yitz if you guys don't mind.
Speaker 7It just feels a lot like exploitation.
@uncutspeechIt's not exploitation! I'm asking a question. You say it's okay to exploit Germany for reparations, okay?
Ian MalcolmI'm almost tempted to make a post just with Bill Goldberg next to George Costanza and ask which Jewish man is more attractive. Run a poll. You got a poll. There's a poll.
@spirit__saintCan you invite some of your friends in here? We'd love to have a little group.
Ian MalcolmI don't know. Be careful. Be careful what you ask for on that one.
Speaker 19Yeah, I wouldn't. I mean, you know, here's the problem. What we've learned, and I've learned this over and over again, is that you'll just say anything. I mean, it's really, again, it's right out of the talmud. Lie to us. The fact that you just, our friend here just asked you in all sincerity, You said that you should just judge these people individually, which, by the way, is what I believe all across the board.
Speaker 19And then he asked you about this reparations thing, which I think is ridiculous in every instance, not just not Jewish, any kind of reparations. Why? Because there is no such thing as transmigration of guilt. This is just moral philosophy talking. Probably don't understand it, but it's obvious. And this obviousity exists because it's consistent with all humans at all times.
Speaker 19It's just like math. It has to work. If two plus two is four, then four minus two equals two. It just has to work in both directions. And when this and hold on, hold on, my friend. And when this guy asked you this and you said, now think about it, you're not paying for the mass extermination that your people overwhelmingly perpetrate on the world.
Speaker 19I mean, basically, you would be living in sackcloth and ashes and exiguous poverty forever because you owe everybody, including everything the truth teller said that you did in. Bolshevik Russia. Hold on. And what's the answer? Hold on. Let me just finish this. What's the answer? What do you say every time people notice 84% of the Bolsheviks were Jewish?
Speaker 19You exterminated all these people. Hold on. Hold on. Time out. Time out. You can talk. 80% of, I'm sorry, the massive number of millions of people that you've killed in the pharmaceutical industry, in Bolshevik Russia, everything else. What is your answer? Your answer is, well, no, no. It's just a happenstance that they were Jewish.
Speaker 19They just happened to be Jewish. The seed of their ability has nothing to do with their ethnicity. But that math doesn't work backwards and forwards with you. You see? I mean, every civilization that you go into, you view your modus operandi as to undermine that civilization. Honestly, if you were just cliquish, that'd be fine.
Speaker 19Lots of races are like that. but you believe that your ultimate means of success and prosperity comes at the expense of the host nation. And yes, I say host nation because it's parasitic. It's obviously parasitic and we all know it. But then when our friend here asks you, you don't even care that you're morally inconsistent.
Speaker 19You said that about that family, but now you say, no, we have a right to steal money from people that you admit are innocent. People that you admit have nothing to do with it. But no, you say because of their race, they have it coming. And buddy, that gives away the game. That says everything about the fact that you believe us versus them.
Speaker 19And that's why we can't tolerate living with you anymore. We can't tolerate it because it's us versus them. We know that we're the them. And we know that you're the very best at othering people. In other words, in every direction possible, We become less, you become more, you live at our expense. If you had a modicum of integrity and you said, no, that doesn't make any sense, you still can't logic it out.
Speaker 19He tried to get that out of you. You still can't logic it out. Wait, why does that kid, why does a butcher's assistant that's 21 years old right now who has that money taken away from him, why morally is that acceptable to you? Why aren't you defending his right? To keep the money that was the product of his effort, of his body.
Speaker 19Why are you enslaving him by confiscating that effort? Explain that.
Speaker 7I'm trying to follow your example. A butchel, you know?
Speaker 19Are you just being like a general? I'm saying a waiter in Iowa is the same thing. Let's say a waiter in Hamburg. A waiter in Hamburg that's 21 years old in the government is taking money. By the way, you're already stealing money from everybody blind. You've got the government of America. I mean, you're using child sex trafficking, blackmail operations to inveigle them to give you money.
Speaker 19But let's put all that aside. Why does a waiter in Hamburg have to give money to people in Israel? Why is that the case? Why does he have to give that money? Tell me morally, justify it morally, why you're going to use a coercive force of government to take money from someone who, by your own admission, has nothing to do, bears no responsibility for the Holocaust.
Speaker 7Okay, okay. So number one, real quick. This is really hilarious coming from the people, the group, who literally... No, no, answer the question. It's hilarious.
Speaker 19I'm going to. But answer the question. No, no, don't need a preamble. Tell me why. I'm just... You believe in original sin. This is Aristotelian lie. Come on.
Speaker 7You believe in original sin.
Speaker 19Okay, it's hilarious. We don't. But tell me why. Here's why. Begin the sentence with this.
Speaker 7This is why that guy owes this money. Tell me. Okay, here's why. Because the people elect the government. They elect who is to represent them. And if they feel a guilty conscience, even though they...
@uncutspeechThis isn't a moral argument, okay? Not at all. Can you actually present a moral argument for why it's okay?
Speaker 7Okay, I was presenting my argument.
@uncutspeechIf you're going to mute me... Yeah, I know you were... Well, that wasn't really an argument, but we're asking you about a moral justification for this being okay.
Speaker 19Okay, my argument is twofold.
@uncutspeechYou elected them as a justification for the moral argument.
@joann_marieWhy does your blackmail the government?
Speaker 19Hold on, hold on, hold on. There is no such thing as a guilty government. If I were to ask you to prove to me... That's not what I was even going to say. Hold on, hold on. If I were to ask you to prove to me the existence of government, showing me the big buildings in any country would no more prove its existence than a church proves the existence of God, right?
Speaker 19I agree. So government is a mechanism of control over people, but it has no moral authority whatsoever. No moral authority. I would say the same about money. The one person you cited, a moral philosopher, Jesus. What political office did he hold? What power did he have? None. His morals and all of our morals ascended from the logicality of his morals.
Speaker 19The thing that's universal within all of us, that's in our souls, that's where it comes from. Now, you think it's wrong to steal. Hopefully, you're going to steal from that person. And now, explain to me, comically, I guess it's going to be, why that kid owes that money. You're going to be the tax man. You're going to go beat him up if he says, I'm not going to give it.
Speaker 19Not going to give this money to Israel. Tell me why. Well, you have to. If you won't use the force of government yourself, then that means that you don't think it's legitimate. If Germany said we were going to quit payments... Germany doesn't say. There's no person called Germany. All the government is the smaller people in charge.
Speaker 7Can I talk now? Sure. The argument is twofold. Number one, as I mentioned earlier, you have victims who are still alive. And if you want to say that the people of Germany shouldn't pay, well, then I guess, like, should Israel pay for them? I guess Israel could foot the bill.
Speaker 19It actually does. Excuse me, but you're describing the landscape. Tell me why that individual... is morally culpable to where he has to give. Remember, money is plasticized human effort. When you take someone's money, this is why John Locke said it's okay to kill somebody if they're stealing from you, because they're essentially stealing your labor, which means they're enslaving you.
Speaker 19So what you're saying is, confiscating that individual, that 21-year-old person's effort, you're saying that you have a right to do this. Why? Explain logically how you have a right to the possessions of this kid. Okay.
Speaker 7irrespective of my views. What if the kids say... I'm asking your views. No, no, no.
Speaker 19Hold on. Hold on. We're not third-personing this. I'm interested in your opinion. You're sitting right in front of me.
Speaker 7My opinion is irreverent.
Speaker 19Well, obviously.
Speaker 7Obviously. This is completely illogical. It's irrelevant.
Speaker 19You're right. What if they want to do it? At least we have arrived at a point of agreement.
@uncutspeechYour opinion is completely irrelevant. He doesn't believe it. He knows his opinion is, he believes his opinion is relevant, but now that you're pressing on him for his moral justifications, all of a sudden his opinion doesn't matter. Okay, so then yes, right? Why are you here? No, no, no.
Speaker 7Don't speak for me. Don't speak for me, please. Well, you're not speaking for you. You're not speaking for you.
@spirit__saintCan I ask Yitz a question that maybe he could better understand? Because I know where you're coming from, David, but I think Yitz needs to see it from our point of view.
Speaker 1Real quick. Ian, I got to drop down, but I just wanted to say congratulations to Ian for 100,000 followers. Big shout out to Ian. I love you guys. Keep fighting the good fight and I'll talk to y'all soon.
@spirit__saintIf you don't mind, Yitz, maybe you could see it from our point of view. If whites in America who were victimized by the opioid crisis decided to hold the government of Israel accountable and Israel had no money to pay us, is it okay for us to confiscate their land as reparations for that war that the Jewish people perpetrated against whites in the United States?
Speaker 7It was the Sackler family, not the Jewish people and not Israel. So who did the Holocaust?
@spirit__saintIt wasn't the German people.
@uncutspeechliving today yeah so by this by this this is exactly the point if the cyclists were from israel you could try to hold on a second yes this is the exact point we're making right like we can just say okay well it was the nsdap and everyone that was part of the nsdap were murdered at nuremberg or they or they're gone now so like again the people that are paying that 21 year old like david has said okay it wasn't these people that you're talking about
@uncutspeechSo it's like this – you, again, aren't justifying your moral claim that they should be able to. And then every time David asks you, you just give a description of what's going on. We know what's going on. Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to bring up the topic. We're asking you why you think it's right. Because you said that clearly you agree with reparations as long as the person is a survivor of the Holocaust.
@uncutspeechOkay, so great. I understand your position there. But why is that okay for that money to be taken out of that 21-year-old's pocket who had nothing to do with the Holocaust, had nothing to do with the plight that was supposedly inflicted on that person?
Speaker 14supposed survivor right like they had absolutely nothing to do with this so can you justify and grind your morals as to why it's okay to take their money like you said earlier it's in very simple terms there's the double standard here on the one hand you're stating that well holocaust survivors should be paid until the bitter end until they're all dead however those who you accuse of committing the holocaust they've already died out
Speaker 14So shouldn't the perpetrators of the crimes be the only ones responsible for making payments? But if they're dead, shouldn't that debt be done?
Speaker 7This is what's interesting. Everyone's asking for my opinion, for what Israel should do, blah, blah, blah. But nobody asked the German people. You know, I believe that the German average German...
Speaker 18I can speak on behalf of the German people because I am a German. The German people would love to fund the Palestinians and stop the Israelis from their genocide. and subverted the german media with jihadist funding and terrorist funding in the middle east and flood our country with mass migration to impose a plutocracy on our people for 80 years, to brainwash our people for 18 years, and completely degenerate our people, right?
Speaker 18We have a quasi-Marxist communist system for 80 years because you told a lie. So who's speaking?
Speaker 19Yeah, and I appreciate... One second, it's... And I appreciate what our friend here is, but it is absolutely... beside the point in terms of the moral question. Because what you're saying is the German people. But you see, there is no such thing as a collective mind any more than there is a collective orgasm. I'm talking about an individual basis because morality only exists as an individual basis.
Speaker 19The standard of my moral system, I can explain it, you can't. is the life of the individual. You should never be able to violate the rights of the individual. That's why I say there is no such thing as a transmigration of guilt. You don't get to murder somebody's dad because his son did something wrong. You don't get to murder someone based on their race.
Speaker 19Now, the virulently bigoted thing that you're saying is, I get to rob the 21-year-old because of something that happened 80 years ago. No. Well, hold on, hold on. Look, I know you're, listen, I know you're a Holocaust denier, and the Holocaust that the Jews perpetrated in Bolshevik Russia, I'm sure you deny that. Like, I'm not going to stop, I can't bring you back from Holocaust denial.
Speaker 19However, all of those people could claim money, could claim a right to your money, because you killed millions and millions of people. And what would your answer be? With Trotsky, I'm sorry, Bernstein, with all these people, what would your answer be? Well, those are just individuals. Those are just individuals. It's incidental that they were Jewish.
Speaker 19And of course, you could say that all the way across the board, but at least, at least you'd be logical in saying, well, you can't come and punish me now. I wasn't even alive during the Bolshevik Revolution. I don't know what 1914, 1915, truth teller can tell you. But the point is, this makes sense, right? Doesn't it make sense that there is no such thing as transmigration of guilt?
Speaker 19I mean, ultimately, you're going to have to physically confiscate that money. If someone resists it, you always have to imagine this. If someone resists having their money confiscated by the government, then they are going to be punished. And what you're saying is they've got it coming. And you can't explain why. That's not what I said.
Speaker 19Nope. Here's what you do. You say, you say, well, what do the Germans think? Notice you're not answering. You say, well, some people say, notice you're not answering. The reason why you're not, and this is why we're done with you people, is the fact that you don't care about truth. You don't care about veracity. You don't care about consistency.
Speaker 19The way people know that I'm sorry, but that you're full of it, is that you're not morally consistent. And this person just revealed this. It was absolutely revelatory when you said, oh, that's just a family over here. And then our friend came up and said, wait a second now. You're punishing a collective group of people that weren't – many of which, most of which weren't even alive then, and then you come up with this, oh, the dog ate my homework.
Speaker 19Oh, if it's this, and gosh, if some people, and if it's the government. But you can't make any moral claim. Don't you understand? Okay, okay, okay. So I want to say two things.
@uncutspeechReal quickly, and I'll let you go just here in a sec. Just because you brought this up a few times, so before you bring it up again, I checked. There's not that much data on this. But Forsa ran a poll in 2025. 82% of Germans rejected Gaza military support. There was a YouGov poll that found that only 36% of Germans were in support of Israel in any sense.
@uncutspeechSo no, this idea that the German people want to pay reparations, like that's bullshit too.
Speaker 7Okay, okay. So my turn to respond. Number one, that's right.
Ian MalcolmBefore you do, I just have to ask, because we're talking about Germany, we're talking about Israel, we're talking about all these places. You've got the Israeli flag in your profile. It says, according to your profile, you're American who initially connected to the app store out of the Dominican Republic. Am I reading this correctly?
Ian MalcolmWhat exactly is going on here?
@uncutspeechWhat were you doing over there in the Dominican Republic? Were you hanging out in the jungle?
@uncutspeechSlave trade.
Speaker 7I took a family. Okay. Okay.
@uncutspeechLeft a whore trafficking ring or money laundering for the card. I don't think we're getting silly.
Ian MalcolmI think we're asking reasonable questions. I mean, you just, you went to the DR and you're just there. You're like, I'm going to get on Twitter.
@spirit__saintHe's doing a button crypto scam.
@uncutspeechWhy are you not back in Israel if that's your chosen land?
Speaker 7Well, I would love to make Aliyah, by the way. Why don't you make Aliyah?
Ian MalcolmWait, why do you want to make it? The option is there, right? You have a right of return, is that correct?
Speaker 13Yes. And it's paid for. You don't even pay for it.
Ian MalcolmSo yes, if Israel is such a wonderful place, you have this burning desire to be there, and you've got your flag, why wouldn't you go?
Speaker 7Here's why, here's why. So let me talk now for a moment. He doesn't want to be around George Costanza.
Speaker 14I don't know who said that. Do you not want to serve in the army? I'm too old for that now.
Speaker 7In terms of Israel, I believe that we need a strong Jewish community in the diaspora. Wait a second.
Ian MalcolmWait a second. This has always been very curious to me. So the Jews are chosen and they're so excited and enthralled about their Jewishness and They want to go on and on about the splendors of Jewish George Costanza and the athleticism of Jewish Bill Goldberg. And yet you're like, I desperately don't want to be around those people.
Ian MalcolmAnd you know what I don't like is the fact that none of the Jews want to get married or have sexual relations with other Jews. They only want to be around the others. And so I got this weird theory, Yitz, that a lot of this... let's say, animus that is held towards the others is actually a result of deep-rooted insecurity and jealousy and envy of perhaps those groups that built those really high-trust, beautiful societies due to things like the Renaissance.
Ian MalcolmI mean, let's be real. If I was an ugly, self-centered, let's say, not-so-talented group of people... And I looked around the room, and it was a bunch of Costanzas and unathletic Bill Goldbergs, the guy who does a great jackhammer. That's his wrestling move, not a sexual position, because apparently people don't want to have sex with the Jews, or at least that's Yitz's suggestion here.
Ian MalcolmSo if I'm looking around the room, and I'm like, I don't want to be around these people, and I look across the sea or across the desert, and I see these beautiful, splendid German people with their blonde hair, their tall stature, their piercing blue eyes, maybe their high intellect. I'd probably be like, I dislike those people too.
Ian MalcolmBecause as I went there, they'd probably look at me and they'd be like, oh, look at this, Costanza. Why don't you go over there, Costanza? We don't like your crew. I can see those things happening. Then I can see that Animus really going deep-rooted. And I can see that group of people looking across the fence really angrily for a long period of time and developing this deep-seated hatred that, oh, I don't know, might be why Netanyahu's carrying around a book about his
Ian Malcolmhis grudge that he's still holding against the Romans that you wanted to talk about. So let me just ask you, is it reasonable to presume that a group of people that maybe aren't all that attractive, maybe they're short, kind of hairy, kind of scruffy, kind of scraggly, maybe they're incapable of just consistent logic and moral frames and maybe treating people with decency and maybe they just thieve from everybody, lie to everybody.
Ian MalcolmYou think that group of people might be desperate to not live around themselves and might suggest that they need to be amongst the diaspora because they actually just don't want to be around a bunch of a-holes that maybe they perceive their fellow people of being. Is that a reasonable conclusion to arrive at?
Speaker 7Okay. I invite you to go to Taube one time if you think it's useful. I mean, I can look at the pictures. It doesn't look like a place I want to be.
@uncutspeechIan, you will not escape Tel Aviv. Ian can't even go near Tel Aviv. Can you imagine?
Speaker 11Ian Malcolm has arrived in Tel Aviv.
Ian MalcolmThe plane immediately blew up, but it was definitely not a Jew. It was definitely Osama Bin Laden. He came back from the dead to get Ian Malcolm.
Speaker 7Come on, Ian. Go to Tel Aviv and tell me there are no Muslim Jews there. Have fun.
@spirit__saintYou know what I figured out? Yitz is a sex tourist. He's in the Dominican. He's too old for military service. He's in the Dominican hiding from Israel. He's going to return once he gets caught in the Dominican fucking kids.
Ian MalcolmYitz, can I just ask you a question? If you had to just make an assessment, and we're going to presume you said you're a heterosexual male, on average, who do you think is more attractive? Jewish women or, let's say, German women?
Speaker 7I'm biased towards Jews.
Ian MalcolmYou actually believe that Jewish women are more attractive than German women? Can you list off three beautiful Jewish women? Just curious.
Speaker 7Gail Goddard, Natalie Portman, for example.
Ian MalcolmThat's another one. Okay. Those are reasonable suggestions. We'll look at them. That was two. Can you name a third?
Ian MalcolmI had plastic surgery. Wait, wait, wait. Can you name a third?
Speaker 7You're talking about millions of people. Who's the lady, who's the lady, the name tip of my tongue is Phantom of the Opera.
@uncutspeechYou know what's funny, Yitz? Literally every time I've had this argument, the Jew has consistently said Natalie Portman and Gal Gadot every single time.
Speaker 14How about Golda Meir, is she attractive? Oh yeah, she's great. Wait, wait, wait, hang on, hang on.
Ian MalcolmI'm really curious. Golda Meir was a Palestinian, right? Yitz, you were able to name two.
Speaker 7Can you get through? Mila Kunis is another one.
Ian MalcolmMila Kunis does not look very Jewish, as far as I can tell.
Speaker 7Hold on. I'm not denying that she is Jewish, but she does not look Jewish. Alona Tau is Israeli. She's blonde, by the way. Blonde hair. So, you know, even blonde and blue-eyed, I know.
Speaker 10She dyed her hair. She dyed it blonde.
Ian MalcolmAll I'm saying is... Hey, Yitz, would it be strange if one of the women that you just listed dyes their hair to look like a different group of people?
Speaker 7Look, there's a rabbi I know who happens to be Orthodox, I'm Reformed, and he's born blonde.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, we're not denying that he is, but this woman is making the accusation that the woman that you just suggested has dyed her hair. Is it strange if a symbol of beauty changes their aesthetics to look like a different group of people?
Speaker 7That's why they intermarry. Blonde-haired Jews do exist.
Ian MalcolmNo, I'm not denying that they do. Just try to focus. The woman that you just suggested as the benchmark of Jewish beauty, according to this other woman who jumped in, has physically tried to alter her appearance to look different, so much so that you were unaware, prospectively, that she has dyed her hair to look different than she'd be born with.
@uncutspeechNow that you bring it up, why did you point out that she has blonde hair as well as this, like, attractive feature that is, like, you know, something that should be covered? It's a non-Jewish feature, that's why.
Speaker 7It's interesting. Natalie Portman is not blonde, so there you go.
@uncutspeechNo, I know, but whenever you brought up... Natalie Portman is also like 4'11 or something. I'm going to lay this out very simply so that you understand. I don't think that you do. The point that we're making here is that the pretty Jewish lady, right? You pointed out a European feature, right? No, no, no. Yes, yes, yes.
@uncutspeechAnd then also, it's not even a real feature. It's like one that she... you know, place pretend, you know, how Jews like to do sometimes where they say they're white when it benefits them. We were talking about this earlier, you know.
Speaker 7We don't do that. I am proudly Jewish. I do not consider myself white. Thank God.
Ian MalcolmHey, I can appreciate it. Yitz, you say things every now and then that I'll give you a pat on the back for. That's certainly one of them. Yitz, out of curiosity...
@spirit__saintWait, so when he gets picked up for fucking kids, what is the crime report going to say?
Ian MalcolmWell, that's a different thing. Yitz, I'm curious. Out of curiosity, of your very proud Jewish friends, what percent of them would suggest that they are white if you asked them if they are white or Jewish?
Speaker 7Probably none. Maybe 1%.
Ian MalcolmJust out of curiosity, because we see this a lot online, and I'm called a bigot for saying that Jews are not white, but you're saying that 100% of your Jewish friends would say that they are not white.
Speaker 7Listen, I don't play games. I don't try to say, oh, we're white. We're not white. We're from the Levant. This is our heritage. I don't consider ourselves to be white. But you're not from the Levant. Yes, we are.
Ian MalcolmThis just got a whole different little strange weirdness. But the good news is, you say that you're not white. We could debate where, in fact, Jews come from. I think Truth might be able to give you some interesting backdrop there in the Levant. That's a curious one. But you are, of your Jewish friends, 100% of them would say that they are not white, definitively.
Speaker 7Oh yeah, because you see, here's how it works.
@joann_marieBut why would they call them, like... fellow white people and then say I'm Jewish.
@uncutspeechMaybe it's better to ask because maybe perhaps Yitz just has super based like ortho fucking Jewish friends that all hate white people and don't want to be associated with them. What percentage of Jews overall, Ashkenazi specifically, do you think would consider themselves white or say that they're white when it's convenient?
Speaker 7I have no idea, but I would put it like this. If you know your heritage and if you're proud of it, you're going to know.
@uncutspeechCan you just make a fucking guess instead of saying you have no idea? Just give a guess. Yes. Like, I don't, like, are you just retarded? Can you ask them that?
Speaker 12And what the fuck is your heritage anyway? It depends on the circumstance. Well, you have to define the word circumstance first.
Speaker 7I would argue that Judaism is more ritual and sophisticated than Christianity.
Ian MalcolmWait a second. More sophisticated?
Speaker 7Especially the Christian Protestantism. What does that mean?
@uncutspeechsophisticated what part is sophisticated is it the genital mutilation is it uh is it is it the all of the you know in the talmud there's these interesting passages right your rabbis they have these arguments about whether or not all gay sex is gay. Like, they talk about whether or not if you're on top, is that really gay?
@uncutspeechIf you're on the bottom, that's definitely gay. But what about, you know, all of this, like, so what is more sophisticated? Is that why it's more sophisticated? Because your sick rabbis went into all of these weird details that, you know, people with common sense and morals don't really need to... you know, consider and argue with God all the time.
Speaker 7No, no, it doesn't discuss that. But look, I will say this. It does discuss that.
@uncutspeechHold on a sec. Why are you just lying? Do I need to go pull it up right now? I was looking at it recently. I think it's Shabbat 54A and Shabbat 53A. If you want the exact tractate, like you keep saying this shit as if people can't just go Google. Let's start very simply.
Speaker 13How many books are in the Talmud? That's a good question. Let's see what the... Let's see, maybe, I wonder if the Gentiles know more. You're telling us what's in it and what's not in it. How many books are in the Talmud?
Speaker 13He's Googling it.
Speaker 20Come on, dude, you should know. He's definitely Googling it.
Speaker 13He's going to come off mute.
@uncutspeechHow come I know? You should know right away. This is the most fundamental, well, you guys would say it's the Torah.
Speaker 7You think they're the same, essentially.
@uncutspeechNo, you definitely weren't muted.
Ian MalcolmAnd then he says, look, everyone, as if we don't notice that he obviously wasn't muted. You've got to stop doing that. It's not working for you.
Speaker 7Just real quick, for everyone to be aware. as a testament of good faith, I stood on for a long time. It is past 1 a.m. where I'm at, and my phone is 17%.
Ian MalcolmWait, so Yitz, just out of curiosity, Yitz, hang on, pause, out of curiosity, in the comments, almost everything I've put onto Twitter since you've last come into the space has been followed with, but you'll never debate me, the Yitz, the all-powerful Yitz. Come to Oz, and I will sit behind my curtain and tell you all about my power.
Ian MalcolmSo, Yitz, is it reasonable that in the future comment section it won't be littered with, Come debate, Yitz! Or do you think that that needs to continue?
Speaker 7Oh, no, I think you proved your point. We had a good debate, and I'm happy to do it again in the future.
Speaker 13Yitz, how do you feel you performed in this debate? Rate your performance on a scale of one to five. Five being very good, the best.
Speaker 7I'd say maybe a four, to be honest.
Speaker 13Four out of five, okay.
Speaker 7But my phone is 15%, so I am going to have to leave soon.
Ian MalcolmHang on, your phone is at 50%? 15, 15.
Speaker 7Oh, 15.
Ian MalcolmOkay, I know paranoia can run rampant, but I was going to tell you, at 50%, you might be okay for a little while longer. But yes, it was a lot of fun. We got to ask not 100,000 questions for Jews, but we definitely got to ask at least 100. I appreciate all of the answers, especially around George Costanza and Bill Goldberg.
Ian MalcolmThat was a lot of fun. And look, you, Yitz. So next time I'm going to tag you when somebody on Twitter says, why do you say Jews aren't white? I'm going to say, ask Yitz and George Costanza. How does that sound?
Speaker 7Yes, tag me 100%.
Ian MalcolmI will tag you if you can come in and go, no, Jews are not white.
Speaker 13You're going to be arguing with a lot of blacks. Yes. And if you're going to go for Gal Gadot, you need to be over six feet tall, and you might need to work out because she plays that Wonder Woman role, so she's kind of in shape.
Speaker 7But she's already married.
@uncutspeechOh, you would have a chance if she wasn't. Yitz, did she marry a Jewish man?
Speaker 16She passed up on you. Yeah, she did.
@uncutspeechShe married a Jewish man? Okay, how about that? Rare. Quick question, Yitz, as well, before you go. When are you moving back to, well, not back, but when are you moving to Israel?
Speaker 7Well, I would love to be a dual citizen. No, no, no, no, none of that.
Speaker 13What are you going back and staying there? Wait, why would you love to be a dual citizen? Aren't you happy he's an American? Why do you need another citizenship?
Speaker 7Because I love Israel. It's my heritage.
Speaker 13What heritage? What heritage?
Speaker 21You're a Goldberg. You're not from the Levant. You're delusional. You're not from the Levant. Let Ray talk. You have this...
@uncutspeechOK, this place is your people, your history. You love it. This place is your ancestral homeland. Yet you want to maintain a dual citizenship. And I mean, that means that if you maintain your American citizenship, even if you live abroad, you have to pay taxes in America. So why do you want to like have this allegiance to America and another foreign land whenever Israel is so great and you're an Israeli through and through?
@uncutspeechLike, I don't understand why.
Speaker 7Because. I'm also a patriot. I'm a proud American as well.
@uncutspeechDo you understand what the three laws of logic are?
Speaker 7Well, go ahead.
@uncutspeechWell, one of them, right, is this law of non-contradiction, okay? And there's also another one. It's called the law of identity. And you touched on both of those just now, but the more important one is the law of identity, right? Do you know what that law of identity describes?
Speaker 7Go ahead.
@uncutspeechSomething can't be something and something else, okay? And or not something at the same time rather. So like if you're Israeli, right, if you're an Israeli through and through, you can't be an American patriot through and through because what an American means as part of the finding stock of America, it's a different category, right?
@uncutspeechGenetically, as far as religion goes, as far as cultural and ethics go, it's different too. So if you claim, right, that you're Israeli because of your genetics and because of your ancestry, then this category must also exist for other people, right? Unless you're saying that these category lines can just be blurred whenever you decide so.
Speaker 7First off, I'm not an Israeli citizen yet.
@uncutspeechAnd if that's the case, why can't Palestinians be Israeli, for example?
Speaker 7Well, there are Israeli Arabs. They make 21% of the country.
Speaker 19If Israel and America were at war with each other, which side would you take? God forbid it never happens. Okay, so try to answer the question again. Give it another try. So first of all, the concept of if implies hypothetical thinking. I'm just not going to answer. Of course you're not. Of course you're not.
Speaker 14So that's, by the way, by the way, by the way, you're not patriotic to America. Right, right. Hold on. If you were, just like if you were patriotic to America, you'd pick America without a second thought.
Speaker 19Right. That is absolutely a fact.
Speaker 14Thank you.
Speaker 13Thank you for coming out. You did a wonderful job.
Speaker 19Yeah, there's no disputing that. You just revealed everything about yourself. And by the way, everything about the problem that we have with you. Everything about the problem we have with your group, you just said it. I want all the advantages of being American, but I will betray you. I will betray you if it's convenient.
Speaker 19That's just what you said.
Speaker 13Are you ready? Yes. Was Jonathan Pollard an American patriot who worked for Naval Intelligence?
Speaker 7He was an Israeli. I mean, he grew up in America.
Speaker 14No, he was in America.
Speaker 13Wait a minute. He was born in America, raised in America, went to school in America. Took an oath. And then worked for Naval Intelligence in America before... He got caught and then, of course, ended up in jail. It was supposed to be a lifetime sentence, but, you know, through your own blackmail operation, he was able to get out of jail early, the Obama administration.
Speaker 13He only renounced his American citizenship after he got caught and he was in jail, and then he got Israeli citizenship when he landed in Israel and was handed over, of course, his passport by Benjamin Netanyahu. So was Jonathan Pollard, who was born and raised in America and worked for U.S. Naval Intelligence, was he American?
Speaker 13No.
Speaker 7He was an American patriot until he felt, his perception, that America was not doing enough to help us. Until. That's it.
Speaker 14Until what? Until America was not doing enough for who?
Speaker 19That's it. He took an oath. To be in the military, you have to take an oath to the Constitution. There's no if. You never, ever betray your country. There's no if. And by the way, but listen, before you go on, thank you. I want everybody to hear this. Thank you for showing who you are. It's if we will betray you, we will betray you under the right conditions.
Speaker 19This is all conditional. Every conversation, just between you and I, every conversation ends in the same way. You live at our expense. It's all conditional. What do we get if we're not getting enough? then we will other you, we will kill you, we will betray you, we'll steal from you, we'll rob to you, lie to you. Even the questions that our friend was asking about Germany.
Speaker 19You said, what do the German people think? Now, you didn't answer the question, well, what does it matter? You didn't answer. You didn't say, well, gosh, the majority of the German people think. Why would you ask that question if, when the answer is the majority of them disagree, you would capitulate? No, no, no. You didn't care.
Speaker 7Logic doesn't matter here. It's all other room. No, no, no. One of you conflated reparations with the war in Gaza. It is very possible. No, no, no. I wasn't asking about that. No, no, no. I never made that. I never had that discussion.
Speaker 19You literally asked the question, how many Germans, what percentage of Germans... think this is okay. And remember, what you're implying in the question is, is that if the majority of people in Germany think it's okay, then you would have thought it was okay. Well, the inverse is true too, right? If you ask the question, you're implying that if the majority of people in Germany disagree with it, then of course it's illegitimate.
Speaker 19And you found out they did, and you didn't say it was illegitimate. What does that mean? That means that truth doesn't matter. Integrity doesn't matter, and this is why I have no interest in talking with anybody representing this point of view.
Speaker 7Because you don't care about truth. David, no, no, no, no. David, this is akin to the argument, if my grandmother had balls, would she be my grandfossil? Like, look, we can talk. Hang on, hang on, hang on.
Ian MalcolmYes, yes, the grandparents cross-dressing, we don't need to go into that. What I am curious about, yes, hang on, what I am curious about is... this this idea of loyalty you can only be loyal to one nation and truth brought up an excellent example in your suggestion was that he was a patriot until he wasn't but then he was still patriotic he just became patriotic to a different country and you can see how that fundamentally does not fly to america until they weren't doing enough for israel so do you think it's that fundamentally
Ian Malcolmit is problematic if there is a group of people who nomadically go from country to country to country benefiting from that country insofar as is of benefit to them and in the moment that it is no longer the most beneficial that they will flip the script entirely on the group of people that they have been let's say utilizing as a battery so that they can then either go back to the host nation that seems to just suck endlessly off of any and every battery it can
Ian Malcolmor they go to another location that they think might be a more viable battery because they don't want to go back to Israel because, as you've suggested, you prefer to be out in the diaspora. Do you see how the rest of the world that is witnessing that would grow very, very tired of that behavioral pattern?
Speaker 7Okay, so here's what's interesting. So Jonathan Pollard is one extreme. The other extreme is Zelensky. He could have fled to Israel during the conflict with Putin.
Speaker 14He will. He will. Zelensky's got his Israeli passport. He did not. If you go away, stop, stop. If you're going to bring up Zelensky, we've got to go through the facts. So if Zelensky moves over to Israel, then he can no longer be leader, of course, of Ukraine. And then he can no longer be the recipient of American... foreign aid, where he's stealing hundreds of millions of dollars.
Speaker 14He's now a billionaire, by the way. So how is he going to get access to all of that cash if he moves to Israel? By the way, he's already got Israeli citizenship. He owns a property in Israel. His parents own a property in Israel. They're Israeli, actually. So he is a dual national himself.
Speaker 13And again, he's got homes also in, of all places, Miami, Florida.
Speaker 14In Florida, the same place where Yair Netanyahu is living. The son of Benjamin Netanyahu has all avoided conscription. During supposedly, because you Jews don't claim genocide, you say, well, it's a war. Well, during time of war, the son of the prime minister isn't serving.
Speaker 13Interesting how that works. Well, you know.
Speaker 14Which is a very bad example, by the way.
Speaker 13He's already a dual national.
Speaker 14He's Israeli. And he said that Ukraine is a part of the greater Israel project. So you still want to stick with that example?
Speaker 7Ukraine has nothing to do with greater Israel, but you know, whatever. Wait, wait, wait.
Ian MalcolmZelensky said that on some of the Ukrainian fighters' patches and insignia is the iconography of the greater Israel. Would you acknowledge that?
Speaker 7Well, it's incorrect. It's not incorrect. We've seen it. Okay, well, then maybe it's true. Listen, I really do got to get going. No, you don't.
Ian MalcolmYou don't get to discuss. Maybe it's true.
Speaker 7Go on to the next thing. It's 1.15 a.m.
Ian MalcolmSo... Hey, Yitz, just out of curiosity, as a final question, then we'll let you go. I know you got to go to sleep, and look, it's a good thing to do. But, Yitz, I got to ask.
Speaker 14Do you watch pornography before you go to bed, Yitz?
Ian MalcolmYitz, if... Well, here you go. Yitz, if I said, Yitz watches gay pornography... And you said, no, no, no, no, that's not true. And I said, yes, it is true. And then you said, no, no, no, it's not true. And then I quickly said, all right, moving right on to the next thing. And I never acknowledged that the thing that I originally said about you watching gay pornography was incorrect.
Ian MalcolmWould you find it annoying if that was a behavioral pattern that I just exhibited over and over and over again?
Speaker 7Well, it wasn't behavioral because I spent like multiple hours tonight. But thank you for having me on, everyone. No, no, you're doing exactly the very thing I'm suggesting.
Speaker 13Yes, by the way, before you go, do you know by subscribing to OnlyFansGirls, you're helping Leonid Ravinsky contribute more towards APAC? All right, all right. I got to go, everyone. Thank you for having me on. Thank you for having me on.
@uncutspeechYeah, get out of the United States. No, no, no, no, no Kabbalah magic. I don't want to hear any Hebrew on your way out. If you're going to leave, just leave, all right? Nobody cares about... You casting spells before you leave. All right. Nobody wants to hear. And by the way, you're not Israel high or whatever the fuck while you live in the United States.
@uncutspeechAll right. Like that's just LARPing. You know, you're sitting there in America talking about I'm Israel. Fuck off, bro. If you're go, go to Israel then.
Speaker 7Uh, just one last point. One last point.
Speaker 13Are you too scared to raise your kids in Israel? Cause there's so many pedophiles there.
Speaker 7No, no, no. There's no pedophiles in this world. Not a single one, dude. Don't put them.
Ian MalcolmOut of curiosity, one more question for you.
Speaker 13Tom Alexandrovich was not a pedophile. The one who tried to lure a 15-year-old in Nevada but then escaped back to Israel of all places.
Speaker 14And you don't think he's got a pedophilia problem? It was just like a one-off and he's never done that before? That was a Gentile girl. Google...
Speaker 7Google Marko Leifel. Now, Naftali Bennett's own son, by the way.
Speaker 14I don't need to juggle her because I actually know who she is. She's a headmistress. Naftali Bennett's own son. He's in the IDF. You mentioned her. How many people did she rape as a headmistress? A lot. Good night.
Speaker 14Was it a 74? Wait, wait, wait.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, no. Before you go, really quickly, I have to ask you. So if I was a salesman for AIL, which was the Automotive Industries Limited, the Israeli attempt at kind of cross-pollinating for a car company, and I was going around saying, trust me, the Israeli cars are definitely the best you've ever had. You should definitely invest in them.
Ian MalcolmAll of them are the best. They get the best fuel economy and the best, and they look the best. They look better than George Costanza. And you were like, oh, okay. And then you watched me walk out of the car dealership, and I got into a Mercedes-Benz. Would you be like, that's kind of weird?
Speaker 8Okay, that's cute.
Ian MalcolmNo, no, it's not cute. Is it weird that you would suggest that Israel is this wonderful country, and yet you're like, I'm definitely going to live in the United States? Zelensky bought him I said dual citizenship I know a dual citizenship because perhaps you'd want to continue driving the Mercedes Benz because you know that Israel is not all that it's chalked up to be but if you suggest that in fact Israel is not that then you can't continue on with your supremacist view of the world the Israeli economy is just a powerhouse just so you know your Israeli because we're talking about reparations your Israeli economy in like 56 was
@uncutspeech80% reparations from Germany.
@uncutspeechAnd now it's propped up by the West giving it funds. Stop it. Just stop the madness, okay?
Speaker 7That's all false. Thank you for having me on.
@uncutspeechIt's just everything we say, false.
Speaker 13I've got no actual argument.
Speaker 10If I don't steal it, somebody else will.
Speaker 13How many bankruptcies are you running away? I wonder how many bankruptcies there were with this powerhouse economy in Israel. Wasn't it over 50,000 businesses that went under? Including the Haifa port? But yeah, it's a powerhouse economy. Okay.
Speaker 18Yeah, and it's not like we didn't even build up the infrastructure in Palestine before the war, right? Yeah, I wanted to ask him a couple of questions. Unluckily he's gone now. My first question would have been regarding the blood libels of child sacrifice. Why in like 1,000 years of history, the past 1,000 years, all over the world there are these six stories of...
Speaker 18child sacrifice ingrained in all these fairy tales all over the world, right? Even in Japan. That's very, very, very curious. They murder all the same sentiments, right? And what's the common denominator? Yeah, the trade routes. Funnily enough. And the other thing was, why are they always taking Natalie Portman as a prime example?
Speaker 18Is it because she has a body of a 12-year-old girl. Very curious. The other thing is I wanted to quickly cite a Jewish author from American Pravda. combine them together with the relative tiny size of worldwide Jewry around 60 million prior to World War II and the inescapable conclusion is that in per capita terms Jews were the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century holding that unfortunate distinction by an enormous margin and with no other nationality coming even remotely close and yes by the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood
Speaker 18the greatest killers of the last 100 years have somehow been transmuted into being seen as the greatest victims. Yes. Very, very curious. At least there are some honest ones, right? And addressing the German sentiment against the Jews. I mean, they have robbed our country. since World War I, right? The Jewish takeover of the Weimar Republic during the Versailles treaties where they completely sold out Germany, then used the downfall of the German economy to come in like a swarm of locusts, completely draining all the money, buying all the companies, draining all the fortune.
Speaker 18and then crashing the german economy and the german weissmark up to a point that people were starving no sentiments even until they declared a boycott war in 1933 even then no sentiments
Speaker 18Five years later, after thousands and thousands of communist Bolsheviks killing Germans in the streets and Bolshevik Polish people killing Germans in Poland and finalizing the killing of a German politician in the French embassy, then for the first time in 1983, there was some sentiments, right? So we kept up for over 200 years of their shenanigans, subverting our culture, bringing degeneracy and communism into the country, and we still didn't fight against their subversion.
Speaker 18Yeah, and funnily enough, he was talking about the labor camps. Yeah, it was very, very curious that all these labor camps were in Germany and the death camps were in Poland and Russia. Funny how that goes, right?
Ian MalcolmYeah, look, and not denying any historical events, but that was kind of curious. And it was funny because he, not I, it was he when I asked him that question about... individuals that have been at multiple camps he said because a lot of them were work camps that i said oh really it is a god i don't know so we we see a lot of the backtracking and uh... and look i think that was actually a unexpected
Ian Malcolmuh... but the kind of funny turn for this conversation i say that because the the point the intent of this one was to be light-hearted uh... only intended to go for about an hour and then we're gonna recommend folks uh... can venture into leonardo space because i know that she's hosting a a politician certainly want to bring attention to that and so uh... i i i don't know mister trudeau are you gonna be holding uh... space after this or uh... or or not my friend i was planning to but i know you and leonardo did so i came to support
Speaker 13I mean, you only hit 100K, you know, once in a lifetime. Hopefully, you know, you get to a million. Sooner than later, we'll be able to celebrate that. And six million, well, I mean, even the Jews would have to celebrate that. In time, hopefully we get there.
Ian MalcolmThe fun, my friend, will be to log in tomorrow, be back down to 99.9, and we'll go back and forth and fluctuate. And look, the sentiments that I led off the conversation with absolutely remain. And what I mean by that is... All of these numbers in this little thing are meaningless in the grand scheme of things. It's all trivial.
Ian MalcolmIt's largely vanity. And the thing that actually matters is the community that we're building, the truth that we're uncovering, the realities that we are kind of at times bizarrely seeing firsthand. And I say that because I think a lot of the responses and the answers that we saw from Yitz here perhaps demonstrated the very worldviews that we push out.
Ian MalcolmThe inability to just address basic questions. The illogical nature of the answers that they provide. What seems like either doublespeak or just a completely different set of standards that are applied between certain sets of people. Even the very idea that you can be somehow a patriot to a country while at the same time being uncertain which side you would fight on in the event that they went to war with each other.
Ian MalcolmIt's pretty wild that those things continuously seem to recur where we over and over and over again experience what looks like just illogical behavior. And so we see that, but the thing that is certainly logical is for us to continue doing... what we're doing in these rooms, in these spaces, trying to bring these truths to the masses, trying to understand this bizarre set of power structures that we continuously see at every turn.
Ian MalcolmI believe that Leonardo may have closed out her room. If that's the case, I know, like I said, we went way longer than expected, but we could certainly go around the room. We've got some other folks that have their hands up, and I'm not sure if Joanne... Truth, it looks like you're... Okay, you're still a co-host, but it's got a blue dot next to you.
Ian MalcolmLet's go through some of these hands and make sure everybody gets a chance to speak if they want to. And with that being said, we could go to Mr. Raid to start that off.
Speaker 21Yeah, thanks, guys. I woke up at 5 in the morning, and I usually do not go on X on 5 in the morning, but I decided to start my day, and thank God I went... into into x and i've been here for like three hours uh it's beautiful uh you know at the end of the day first of all congratulations uh ian on the 100k and good to see you all uh yeah the guy was a sport like really but but but i think what what i take from from it all is that these people are only tribal
Speaker 21That's it. And the tribe is built on mythologies and falsified history. And nothing proves... Like the guy ended up saying, other than he destroys all the alphabet when he speaks. I don't want to speak bad about him. He's not here. But it is just tribalism based on nothing but... just a sense of tribalism that they're willing to defy logic, truth, reality, and everything else just because of this sense of tribalism that is sick.
Speaker 21There is not, you know, it is pathological, that sense of tribalism. But anyway, I loved it. I enjoyed it. Thanks a lot for that. And it is fascinating, me sitting, you know, in the Levant, where these people came in with their idea 100 years ago, and we've been, you know, struggling and suffering ever since. that, you know, on the other side of the globe now, we've got, you know, beautiful American people waking up to that reality of these beings and pushing back.
Speaker 21And I see a battle. We do a battle here that is more kinetic, but you guys are doing the most important battle because before you free Washington, D.C. from them, we're going to keep... doing this maybe for another seven decades. I don't know. So I'm hopeful with people like you guys, you know, the tribe of, I call it the tribe of the truth against, you know, that Talmudic tribe.
Speaker 21And again, like I said this before, You know, you've got the tribal elders, you know, not in age, but in wisdom. And some of the elders are Ian and Truth, definitely, and the rest of you guys. So, so much love to you. And I really, really enjoyed it. It was fascinating, this show and tell, because these people need to be, you know, called out for their...
Speaker 21and their evil deeds and ways that have been going on for ages. And they were able to, for a long time, for decades, they were able to make it a taboo to discuss them. They were able to make it like you feel a sense of shame if you even mention the word Jew. And now that's all gone.
Ian Malcolmyou know and and everyone is discussing finally the elephant in the room and uh yeah it gives me a lot of hope so much love to you guys thanks ian yeah absolutely right and and and look the the wildest part is that uh and i really do think that there's something beautiful about it which is everybody collectively coming together to that conclusion
Ian MalcolmAnd it's so funny because the very thing that was the diversity project was largely used, in my belief structure anyway, to weaponize against homogenous societies so that they would ultimately break down and then be easier to lord over. And so ironically... In doing that, what they have actually created is a group of people that even though we have our differences, whether it's religion or race or creed, we've all at least kind of learned to just put up with one another.
Ian MalcolmAnd we shouldn't really even have to use that term put up with, but you can envision that there are lots of people that otherwise wouldn't find common ground because of all these different tribal things. And I mean, we even see communities where there's infighting, even if they're the same race, the same hair color, the same religion, but they cheer for a different sports team.
Ian MalcolmBut we've seen so much of the mashing together of all cultures that people are finally able to look around, and diversity in a lot of ways might backfire on them. Because even in spite of all the differences, the disagreements, we're able to just say, let's put it aside, guys, and make the world better. And so it's a beautiful thing to see everybody coming to that conclusion, not out of hate, but rather out of protection against the thing that they seemingly do hate.
Ian MalcolmAnd that's the unfortunate part about this whole thing is that I don't think anybody in here wants the animus. And I don't want to speak on anybody else's behalf, but I don't think Truth Teller wakes up and is thinking to myself, oh man, we need to find another thing to rail against Jews about. And instead, you just wake up and it's, they did another thing.
Ian MalcolmHere's another thing. Here's another thing. And I don't find any joy in that. Obviously not. But you wake up one day, it's Epstein. You wake up the next day, David Ellison's buying another thing. You wake up another day, just on and on and on. And so until people get comfortable discussing these things, we're not going to be able to resolve them because you can't fix a fire that you can't even point to.
Ian MalcolmAnd so we're going to continue having these conversations, not out of hate for anybody, but just out of love for the good so that we can get rid of, like TruthTeller would say, we need either fuel or poison. Those are your two options for food, for spirituality, for infotainment, for entertainment, and for information.
Ian MalcolmAnd so the more... The more fuel that we can give for people to positively improve their lives, the better. And the only way we can do that is by being able to point to the fuel and the poison and to let people know which is which. And so that's what we're going to keep trying to do as best we can. So, Raid, so much love to you, my friend.
Ian MalcolmLet's check in. I know Mr. Manco Smash has been in here a long time. Don't know if he's there. If not, we'll go up to Joanne. But, Mancos, are you with us?
Ian MalcolmPerhaps not. Let's check in with Joanne and then we'll go to Dr. Strange.
@joann_marieNo, I loved it. I think this is my favorite piñata ever. I can't believe that he just kept digging a deeper and deeper hole. He was like, OK, fine, fine, fine, fine. I'll concede that they just control the media. Now let's talk about the banks. And Colin was like, no, no, no, you don't want to go into the banks. This is the most hilarious piñata ever.
@joann_marieIt's just amazing because he's really honest. So I like that. It's just they tell you what they think of you. And it's just... immoral and the double standards are insane. And I don't know, I loved it. I hope he comes back and I hope more people listen to this because this is who these people are. And I'm so proud of you, Ian.
@joann_marieCongratulations on 100K. And I do celebrate it. I am really grateful for all the people that listen to you and Truth and Colin and everyone here because you guys are absolutely brilliant. So I do celebrate it. It's not numbers to me. It's like, more people waking up, you know, it's not out of vanity. It's out of like, I'm, I'm so proud of you guys.
@joann_marieAnd, and I have hope for, for humanity. And, and you guys are a really important part of that. So I'm so proud. I'm so thankful. We are so blessed to have you guys. And it's, it's just amazing. So love you all. And then that's it. Thank you.
Ian MalcolmYou're the absolute best. And, and, and look, if, uh, I always joke because Joanne is the ultimate co-host with the most, and with a lot of Truth Teller, the spaces that he's running, that I've been running, Joanne's been unbelievably valuable as part of this endeavor. And so I always joke that she's Batgirl to Truth Teller's Batman.
Ian MalcolmI'm over here in Robin, and I just hope that I can have the Robin. costume from the Chris O'Donnell Batman. I don't want the old one with the green and the red. Yeah, I don't think the spandex will look good.
Speaker 14Superman, Batman, you're not a Robin.
Ian MalcolmAlright, I'll take Superman. That'll work. Which makes Joanne Wonder Woman, but definitely not the Gal Gadot rendition. Yes, not that one. But no, no, no. Joanne, you're just such a blessing. And look, that's the irony, is that a lot of people would want to push back on giving this individual Yitz a microphone. Why would you do that?
Ian MalcolmWell, in a lot of ways, he demonstrated all the things that we would talk about, right? Demonstrated perhaps the sense of superiority, the belief in dual citizenship, that you can kind of have the best of both worlds and that logic need only apply when it's of benefit to this collective set of interests. And so I think in a lot of ways, Joy, and you're exactly right, bring that guy back.
Ian MalcolmRight? Let him say the things that we get called anti-Semitic for suggesting they would say. Let him suggest, yes, Jews are not white. That's a crazy thing to suggest. Well, why did Jews call me a bigot for saying that? Why does Simon Dixon say that I'm a crazy person for saying that? Simon's a pretty reasonable person.
Ian MalcolmWhy does Ryan Dawson, for what it's worth, why does he say that that's a ridiculous claim? And we can look at the genetics, we can look at the culture, we can look at the religion. There's lots of reasons to justify it, but I apparently don't need to do it because Yitz just did it for us. And so real quick, before we go down, I know we got lots of other hands in here.
Speaker 13Yeah, just real quick. Do you remember when he said that a rabbi would never approve of pornography? Okay, just exclude them. Of course, Rabbi Solomon Friedman, owner of Equitable Capital Partners, and Rabbi Shmuley, who owns a sex shop.
Speaker 14Rabbi Shmuley!
Speaker 13Then he just went quiet and changed the subject again. But he's never heard of Rabbi Solomon. He's got to look that one up.
Ian MalcolmYeah, there were lots of got to look that up moments, which is very, very strange. Maybe almost disingenuous with the suggestion he was unaware.
Speaker 13And all those times he got muted when he didn't. Or couldn't type fast enough to Google search it without being so obvious.
Ian MalcolmI was waiting for him to accidentally be heard in the background being like, Alexa, tell me about... Just asking AI.
Speaker 16Siri, help me. Siri.
Ian MalcolmBut no, it was ridiculous. I also just want to give a quick little shout out before we go to the next hand with Dr. Strange. I just want to give a lot of love to Mr. Colin for being up here. We had Colin, Uncensored, and Wolf was in here for a little while. And maybe I'm crazy, but it felt kind of like JQ Radio Energy was back in this space with the degree of ridiculousness of it.
Ian MalcolmAnd I quite loved that. It's been a while since we had such a wild conversation. I mean, it meandered very positively, right? But it was fun. It was not the traditional argumentative posture that we have to take. And again, that individual did us a lot of favors. He actually agreed with more things than to Joanne's comment.
Ian MalcolmWe went through and he was like, okay, fine, the media. Let's not talk about the banks. Okay, fine, the tech companies. Okay, fine, social media. Okay, fine, AI. It's indicative of how we are winning. People cannot, in good faith, and actually, Yitz, wherever you are in the ether, I'll commend you. Because a lot of people would just disingenuously say, no, that's still not the case.
Ian MalcolmAt least he was willing to say, yes, okay, they do control all these things. And then we talked about whether or not the world's getting better, and he was like, okay, fine, they're getting worse. And so credit to him for being able to at least suggest that. And maybe I actually should question if he's even Jewish, because if so, he's one of the few that's been willing to just call it like it is.
Ian MalcolmBut I wanted to give a quick little shout-out there of some love. both to Colin, to Wolf, to Uncensored, to JQ Radio, to the energy that this was. And in a lot of ways, for what it's worth, these conversations are still powered and fueled by the network that those guys begot with some of the work that they did, the massive amount of time and energy and love that they put into it.
Ian MalcolmAnd I've actually seen in the purple pill of the 330 comments, there's at least two in there that are talking about how JQ Radio needs to come back. Not putting that on your back there, Colin. But just calling out the love that's out there for it.
@uncutspeechWell, I will say thank you, as always, for co-hosting. It feels like, you know, you always said you had a home in JQ Radio. I also feel like I have a home at a bunch of your guys' faces, too. You know, whether or not that's yours, Truth Teller's, Joanne's, there's a bunch of the guys and women that have made this thing possible.
@uncutspeechYou know, what made JQ Radio possible, too, back in the day. And that network, like you said, still definitely exists. I will say that... all three of us have, what should I say here? We have some ideas and stuff, put it to you that way. I don't want to make any timelines or commitments or anything for anybody. But all of us, the thing we were doing, you know, like it was important and probably won't be the same shape again if we get back into it.
@uncutspeechBut we have some content ideas and some projects that we're thinking about maybe doing. So GQR, there might be some GQR projects projects coming down the pipeline here shortly. Who knows?
Ian MalcolmJQ Radio adjacent. Colin, I'll have to connect you on the back end with Mr. Vilek, who's been doing traditionally some of those AI videos for me, and I think he's got a curious little project in the background that might be... Right up your guy's alley.
@uncutspeechI love his stuff. Perfect. I'll talk to him. I follow him. But you know what? I've got to talk to him more. I really like what Volek does. But yeah, connect us, and maybe we can get started on something. I remember a while back he was talking about maybe doing something, and we never got around to it. But I really do like his stuff.
Ian MalcolmYeah, he's phenomenal, and he's got some tech, let's say, dabblings that I think might make things very, very interesting. Yeah, could be curious. For what it's worth, another little quick shout-out. Speaking of JQ Radio and the inception of that and how these things have all blossomed, just going to throw out there, it's late December.
Ian MalcolmEarly January, right around the corner, a new year, a new page, a lot of opportunity for these things to continue going viral. And I just want to give us a little early Christmas present to everybody that's in here. I think come January, and I've kind of tipped my hat, Mr. Trudeau, I'm not going to let too many secrets out of the bag here.
Ian MalcolmI think we'll be hosting at least two very interesting spaces that I've got commitment to from some pretty large voices. And I hope everybody in here will be able to be part of that. And Colin, I say that because it might end up being some good material for that project that Mr. Volek is looking to launch. So it's crazy to think.
Ian MalcolmThat JQ Radio, going back a little over a year at this point, if I'm not mistaken, seeing that go from zero to 30 or 40,000, whatever it was, and all of us in our little ways, our little accounts, all came together to become like the Voltron or whatever it would be, right, the transformer thing. Now we look around the room and we still have the ability to merge all of our and unify our efforts, but all of us individually keep getting stronger and stronger and stronger with each other.
Ian MalcolmI almost feel like in this weird way, we're out, not to reference Bill Goldberg, but we're like wrestlers in the gym continuously getting stronger and stronger because we all support one another. And I learned so much from Truth Tower. He's over there doing every workout known to man. I'm like, oh, I can maybe incorporate some of that into my routine.
Ian MalcolmAnd so we're all doing that.
Speaker 22Ian, how ironic was it that Gunther ended Goldberg's career? Wait, say this again? I said, how funny was it that Gunther, the German, ended Goldberg's career?
Ian MalcolmWait, you're going to have to explain that. I know of Bill Goldberg. He looked like Stone Cold Steve Austin. But tell me about Gunther. I don't know anything about this person.
@joann_marieGunther is the biggest... Oh no, he has... His internet sucks. Joey!
@joann_marieWell, while he comes back, guys, please repost this space. Follow Ian and Truth and Colin and the amazing speakers. And also, if you guys go to it, I will also repost it. And thank you, everybody, so much for being here.
Speaker 21Guys, may I jump in? I think I was next. Go ahead, Dr. Strange.
Speaker 13All right.
Speaker 21just want to quickly say something before it moves to another topic what ian was saying because this is what i always think on by myself is is that x is very end spaces are very individualistic and people do not organize and come together i think you guys can create a powerhouse like proper something that would make you know the your ancestors proud and so many people came before you
Speaker 21and spoke about this issue, but they were one here and one there over the decades. And I think organizing together and working together and coming out with full force. And I would also add, I always worry about losing X and worry about where I'm gonna fucking find you after X. Like, how do I go about it? So also, a part of the organization is just to make sure that even if they shed down eggs,
Speaker 21you guys will still go because this momentum is once in a, I don't know, the last time maybe in the 20s, there was that kind of momentum in America and a little bit in the early 60s, I think maybe. So this momentum is once in 100 years or 200 years. And I think, yeah, you guys have a huge responsibility on your shoulders and you're doing fascinating.
Speaker 21So, yeah, all the powers to you. Thank you.
Ian MalcolmYeah, right. I'm curious, and maybe we can ask this question either to Raid or Andy, if you want to jump in, or Dr. Strange. I'm kind of curious on that, because it does feel like the momentum is certainly in our corner, right? We got the wind at our back. At some point, I do believe that there's going to be the opportunity to remove the anonymous avatars without potentially the fear of the economic backlash, because at some point,
Ian Malcolmif you get enough people to say, hey, I think there's a problem with Jewish supremacy, well, if you say that on social media, your employer can't just say, well, you've lost your job, because at some point, if enough people notice that if you say that you can't work in a professional setting, well, then doesn't it just affirm the suggestion that maybe Jews have too much power?
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm kind of curious, either Andy or Dr. Strange, if either of you guys want to jump in, do you think is 2026 the year where people will be able, to make that statement and suggest that maybe not the Jews, but perhaps Zionism is a problem in the West while still being able to work at a Fortune 5000 company, let's say.
Speaker 5Thanks, Ian. First and foremost, congratulations on hitting 100K. Just a few days ago, I was saying to myself, we need to get this guy to hit 100K. It's just not right that being stuck in the 90s for such a long time. So mad props, and you deserve it. I came in at the tail end of the space, so I missed much, much of it.
Speaker 5Unfortunately, it looks like I missed a good one. I've seen Yetz. I'm not sure how to pronounce his name. He's a recent comer, and I've seen him in another space. And part of the reason why I came up is because I wanted to ask him a question. Essentially, he was in another space with a bunch of fellow Americans, and he was trying to make the case on how...
Speaker 5America needs to go to war with Iran and pursue a military intervention. And the Americans were like, look, hey, you know, they're not bothering us. We really don't want to be involved. And he kept trying every which way. And then he said, someone said to him that, look, these Iranians are happy, have seen videos. They're, you know, they're living their lives.
Speaker 5Why do we want to go bother them? And then he pulled the 80% poll out of his ass. interestingly enough, I've looked into this poll, so I wanted to come up here and actually opine on that. So he basically said, oh, look, 80% of the Iranians wants regime change. There was an internal poll, and look, it's a moral right that we need to go give these people freedom and bring back the old monarch.
Speaker 5He didn't say that, but obviously that's the Israeli plan. So I had spoken into Mario's space a while back ago on this poll because this is how they fool people. And mind you, I'm not like a diehard Iranian fan or Iranian regime fan. I've actually criticized them at times. But, you know, you have to tell the truth where the truth is.
Speaker 5So I've looked into the poll. Oddly enough, There's a dissident group outside of Iran that had conducted this poll, and they have this TV channel as well. And these are all like monarchists who wants to bring back the old monarch. And it was an online poll. It wasn't like you going around and doing a real poll. It was an online poll, which can easily be manipulated.
Speaker 5And lastly, the poll said, do you like your government? That's it. They didn't say, do you want regime change? They didn't say anything of that sort, but they've conflated, twisted, manipulated to say that, oh, these Iranians, 80% of them on this fictitious online poll, which was probably a bunch of their friends who live in Iran, have stated that they don't like their regime.
Speaker 5Therefore, that means they want regime change or they don't like their government. I'm like, shit. if we were to survey Americans or British or many of the other governments, many people would say, yeah, I don't like my government, but that doesn't mean they want a foreign country to come in and conduct a regime change and install a monarch for them.
Speaker 5I mean, the way they manipulate the masses by leveraging these kind of information is just sickening because at the end of the day, Americans are going to end up paying for this shit, and we're going to end up having to clean up their mess if that gets into it. Now, the main reason why I came up here is because essentially I wanted to break apart his nonsense that he was pushing for such a long time, but he ran away, so I didn't get a chance.
Speaker 5But nevertheless, I thought it would be important to share it with the rest of the group. As far as your question, Ian, Ian, now, you know, I love you guys and I understand the frustration and all. I have a different perspective. I look at the ideology at hand, not necessarily the religion or ethnicity of an individual.
Speaker 5Just because from a religious, spiritual perspective, I take a different understanding. But I do agree with a lot of the stuff that you've pointed out, which is based on receipts and facts. but I just take a different position in that regard. My worry is the following. My worry is that the Zionists have basically used the GOP like toilet paper, and they've hijacked the GOP essentially, and they're pushing the Israeli agenda, prioritizing the Israeli agenda over real American issues.
Speaker 5And what this will do is that the GOP will be, so catastrophically, when I say GOP, I mean the conservative movement, because I am conservative by values, and I prefer conservative values. My concern is that they're going to create such a catastrophic election cycle in the midterms and the next election that you're going to have the Democrats come back in power.
Speaker 5And then they will turn around and basically pursue the censorship. And then the same group, the same Zionists, are going to go back with the Democrats and push for all those censorship laws. So that's my worry. And sadly enough, a lot of people in the conservative movement, GOP, does not realize that the Zionists are basically using the GOP like toilet paper.
Speaker 5And they're going to throw it away in the gutter. And then they're going to turn around and join. the Democratic Party to push the same censorship against free speech once they come into power. And sadly enough, a lot of the people who are completely sold on, they don't, what Trump is doing is that he's basically treating some of the symptoms, but not bringing any change.
Speaker 5And people just don't realize that he's not really tackling the systematic issues. And I'm referring to a lot of the people in the Republican Party. He's not been able to tackle. He won't tackle. And he's only putting lipstick on a pig. And there's no real change that you're going to have long term. So although I do, I am kind of happy with some of the immigration things that are happening.
Speaker 5I do think it was completely out of control and it was a disaster. But I still think the H-1B visas are not where it should be. I'll end with that. I'm not sure if that answered your question. I think it will get worse before it gets better. I'm normally an optimist, but that's just my take. I hope I'm wrong. I pray I'm wrong.
Speaker 5I hope that we can find an easy path. My concern is my solution is simple. It's simple, yet not easily accomplished if you're able to remove money from politics from election cycle then you have a chance of putting people in who are not sold because otherwise you're going to have prostitutes in government and and these prostitutes do not work for you they work for their pimps they work for the paymaster um and sadly enough and it's
Speaker 5It's giving the name of prostitution a bad name because these people are worse than prostitutes. So that's the sad reality of it. And if anybody's heard the recent Tucker Carlson interview with Matt Gaetz, I highly urge you to go listen to that interview. You may not agree with everything, but it gives you a glimpse of the depths people go or I guess some elements go to
Ian Malcolmtrying compromise the elected officials who won't be it won't be able to be bought all of the day thank you so much and and thank you for that that strange and uh... well stated and look i i do think the censorship is is certainly gonna get worse before it gets better and i i say that because unfortunately the more censorship is required for more people to start to notice that it's happening in the first place, which is one of the curious things about what we are facing at the moment.
Ian MalcolmAnd the unfortunate reality that the group in charge are so thin-skinned that any and every piece of finger pointing in their direction, almost no matter how softly you do it, is met with shrieks and... pearl clutching and all sorts of other claims of being targeted or fearful or any of this other nonsense, even as we, of course, only advocate for peaceful solutions and conversations around these subjects.
Ian MalcolmBut paranoid people are incapable of perceiving threats in a reasonable fashion. I see we've got Andy in here, so let's go to Mr. Andy and check in with him.
Speaker 23Ian, good night. One interesting thing about the censorship is Trump did... one good thing he did um actually make zuckerberg um really get rid of some of the guard rails on instagram like i have been seeing like way more stuff like again, the thing about the Jews pushing the communism in the Soviet Union, a bunch of Fuentes stuff has been circulating on Instagram.
Speaker 23Like, that would have never been happening in 2024. Like, I remember posting benign political comments on my Instagram, and it got removed. Like, just basic normie critiques of Democrats. And so, like, 2024, you couldn't post shit on Instagram. So that is one good thing. But yeah, I'm afraid it's going to come really crashing down, because when Democrats take power, all of these just normie mega influencers that kind of
Speaker 23We're calling this out. The Democrats are going to wipe them clean. We're going to all get wiped for speaking out against this stuff. And you're just going to have a mix of leftist ideology getting their own free, pushing their trans crap. And then you're going to have the Zionist crap. And then all of the MAGA people that weren't talking about this and were just saying, yeah, Trump's great.
Speaker 23He's deporting a few people with a TikTok at it when they get their account wiped. And the excuse used to put... wipe them is going to be, oh, they pushed anti-Muslim stuff. That's hate speech. Then they're going to be like, what happened? What happened? I thought we were on the right side of things. And they're not going to see it coming.
Speaker 23And there is some political solutions to this. There are some America First candidates running. Like right now, you have Casey Push running for Ohio governor against Vivek. And he's actually ratioed Laura Loomer a few times in the past couple of days, despite only having 22,000 followers. So there are candidates running in these midterm elections in states across the country that we can all use our platforms to try to support.
Speaker 23Like, yeah, I studied political science, so I'm more on the political side of things. But again, if we can all use our platforms to support candidates that aren't trying to flood our countries with foreign workers, I think that would be great. Hold on, I'm just going to read you one of his recent posts eight hours ago.
Speaker 23Here's my great uncle on the ladder of his F4 Phantom in Vietnam. He's showing the family hairline, which is good for an extra 10 knots of top speed. Heritage Americans are very real, and we are very proud, and we are very pissed about something. Vivek Ramaswamy says and stands for, our families didn't narrowly avoid getting their asses shot off to let Ohio be flooded with H-1B visa Indians and have data centers shoved down their throats by a billionaire Indian tech bro.
Speaker 23Reject Vivek's vote push. I mean, this sounds like our type of candidate, and we should be commenting under his posts. to try to promote him because I mean, if Laura Loomer is against him and he's actually addressing the real issues, we have to try to get a few decent candidates elected instead of saying, oh, it's no difference, everyone's controlled because there are a few good candidates out there fighting against this.
Speaker 23And if we can get a few decent governors in place, then that gives us a chance in the 2028 primaries of maybe actually having a chance to challenge Vance with someone. Because if it's just a bunch of
Ian Malcolmgovernors that are controlled and we have no chance but we get a few america first governors then maybe we can actually put a dent in this thing and for what it's worth on that one andy i i i i do think look uh... we need in terms of making a dent i think it's a a great comment there because we we have to figure out how to make real change
Ian MalcolmLittle by little, advances where we can, and that's why I think things like ASAPAC with what Dr. Michael Recknenwald is doing is incredibly valuable. And similarly, so are these spaces. If you can get out and you can either run for a small office or you can fund somebody who's trying to do that or you can support them or you can share their content or you can speak in these spaces, whatever we can do.
Ian Malcolmto just try and create a larger and larger voice and awareness to this challenge and then ultimately to try and respectively start moving some of the pieces in the opposite direction politically, in terms of the media, in terms of technology, etc. But, you know, at the end of the day, folks, the onus is then on us, just like TruthTeller will always say, there's lots of poison, right?
Ian MalcolmBut we can choose to grab the fuel. We can choose to do the little things, whether it's grounding, like you talked about yesterday, in that incredibly interesting space, whether it's avoiding some of the pharmaceutical side of things, that's not medical advice, but just being careful of what's being pushed out there, or treating your body right with the right food, the right, like we were saying earlier, entertainment, right, spiritual opportunities, et cetera.
Ian MalcolmSo, Andy, really well stated. I'm curious if, I know we got William, Helene, and Aaron. I don't see any hands, though. Curious if either of you guys want to jump in. Feel free to certainly do so.
Speaker 12Well, oh, hey, and I want to congratulate you on 100,000. Another 174,000 to go. And you'll hit the magic number of 274, so hang in there. But, yeah, I'm not going to round it up to 6 million. And I did really enjoy tonight's show and tell session. Perhaps... This Fitz guy, whatever his name was, he saw that Max the Jew cartoon you put together and said, hmm, I can't go there.
Speaker 12I don't know. Maybe that was of assistance to him. Who knows? It may be quite difficult to do it on this guy, but if so, I look forward to it. And that's it. So congrats. Great space. I really enjoyed it. All the best. God bless everyone.
Ian MalcolmYeah, very, very kind of you to share that. And William's certainly going to continue doing what we can, my friend, just to bring these uncomfortable truths to everybody and to do it in a way that ultimately is, like we were saying, advancing the cause. Now, here's something that's curious, because it has to do with this idea of censorship.
Ian MalcolmAnd I say that because an individual had a post that they put up that... I commented on and it got ratioed very very very badly for the original poster. The person then responded to me saying why didn't I block you again? And I just responded to that politely with do you enjoy being ratioed? I thought it was kind of a funny remark which of course that also ratioed her very very heavily.
Ian MalcolmShe then responded to that saying I enjoy peace of mind. At which point I said you can cope it's going to get worse and it did now i i say all these things because that person since quote we did my response they said that i mean idiot and all these other negative little slurs they then made the comment that i'm pulling them which is why i'm not even respond and i tell you the story all of you
Ian MalcolmBecause my assumption is at this point this person's hoping that I respond so that they can then make an appeal to X and say that I'm using a bigger account and I'm responding to them and it's really hurting their feelings. And so that's one of the weird pieces that we're probably going to notice in the coming future is that those that are in control of the censorship and the suppression regime are probably going to gaslight a lot.
Ian Malcolmthey're probably going to throw around a lot of mean slurs, hoping that you respond in a way that ultimately allows them to report you as being the bully or as being the aggressor. And isn't it curious that the very people that are prospectively going to take those steps are the ones that are throwing out all the nasty language, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd so on this note, it's kind of a nice way to come full circle because on this space... I think one of the things that perhaps, I don't like to ever pat myself on the back, one of the things that Truth Tower, myself, and some of the others that are up here have done maybe a decent job of is growing our account while talking about these subjects.
Ian MalcolmAnd to do that requires a little bit of finesse, not suggesting that I possess it, but perhaps have gotten lucky. And it's real... Well, I hope. And it's really critical, I think, right? As we continue forward and as we bring more and more attention to this, they will get more desperate. They will play all these games.
Ian MalcolmAnd if we do not step into their, let's say, current traps and paradigm, which includes things like, oh, I don't know, use the term Jew, right? If that's not going to be enough, then they're going to do other things to try and antagonize us to the point that we say something that they can use against us. So I just use that as a call.
Ian Malcolmto caution. We should be optimistic about lots of things. We are winning. But be cautious that these people are going to use, and I say these people, who are they? Those that want to get us kicked off of this app. Some of them might be Jews, maybe even a lot of them. But they, the people trying to get us kicked off of here, are going to get more and more desperate.
Ian MalcolmSo just be aware. And just recognize those booby traps and maybe don't step into them. And even if somebody does something as outlandish as suggesting that you are the bully while they are throwing around all the slurs, it's probably best just to not engage at all, right? Because let's think about it this way. If you're Bill Goldberg, because we talked about him earlier, and you're the big strong guy, which I think all of us that are in this room are, right?
Ian MalcolmWe've been able to rise because of our courage and our strength above the lies. But if Bill Goldberg is walking through a bar, a guy can come up, he can probably jab him in the side. He can probably trip him. Oh, sorry, it was an accident. The moment Bill Goldberg gets up and pushes that little twerpy guy who maybe intentionally tripped him, Bill Goldberg is the one that's going to have to deal with the police officers.
Ian MalcolmBecause he's the big strong person. So we need to recognize that that is us. There are little twerps that are out there trying to trip us up. trying to annoy us, hoping that we use our strength in a way that they can then go and cry to mommy and daddy. And unfortunately, Nikita Pierre is still the head of Product of X until I see otherwise.
Ian MalcolmAnd he's probably going to use that authority in favor of that group of people from which I think he might have that bias. So let's be really cautious. Let's be really careful. Let's walk through this little jungle together with our torches of truth. Let's always keep one eye in front of our feet. while the other is looking for new people that we can maybe introduce these truths to.
Ian MalcolmLet's watch out for those booby traps, those tripwires. We've got to be like Indiana Jones as we venture out there. Indiana Jones, unfortunately, Harrison Ford, also Jewish. Oh, man. So is Spielberg. Weird. So many of these great heroes. You know who's not Jewish? Is the creator of Indiana Jones, which was not Steven Spielberg, for what it's worth.
Ian MalcolmIt was George Lucas. What a cool guy he is, for what it's worth. A lot of storytelling in Star Wars, and I owe that space to Rabbi Malleus about the perspective morality that's built into that movie, that cinema. But let's be like Indiana through the end of the last crusade. We've got the three tests. I'll try if I can be creative here.
Ian MalcolmThe first is designed to chop off your head, digitally speaking, let's say. They need to suppress, and they need to censor us. So they've got those spinning blades, just like in Indiana Jones. They are going to throw them from every direction. It's cowardly. It's weak, right? But we know the secret. And what is it? I think he says the penitent man.
Ian MalcolmHe talks about the penitent man over and over again. Who is the penitent man? It's he who kneels before God. That's Indiana. That's what goes through his head, right? As he takes a kneel, it allows him to dodge the little blade, dives through. What is the next little challenge? It's the leap of faith from the lion's mouth.
Ian MalcolmWhat a curious little piece of iconography, right? He's got the invisible bridge. It looks impossible. He doesn't know it's invisible. He's got the chasm. How is he going to cross it? He's got to put his faith in something. Put it in God. Put it in truth. Know that it will catch you as long as you just honestly put one foot
Ian Malcolmin front of the other each and every day. It'll get us to the last little challenge in this strange little metaphor, which is what? It's to identify the cup of Christ and the cup, the chalice that we are all going to drink from. It's not the one with the gold and the rubies and the diamonds, right? It's the modest one.
Ian MalcolmThat is the path that we are walking. It is the penitent path. It is the path of confidence and conviction in that higher power that it will catch us and it's the knowledge that we're not going to get that glorious rich what would you even say you might call it obnoxious chalice we don't need it we just need the truth and if we do it we will find ourselves with eternal life or at least that's the story of indiana jones but perhaps it's the one that we will find right he was talking earlier
Ian Malcolmabout this idea that this is something that comes maybe once a century that we are part of. We're in the early innings of this thing. We're at the beginning of the movie. But if we keep putting one foot in front of the other, think of how far we've come in a year, in two, think of where we will be this time next year as we get ready to celebrate once again the birth of Christ.
Ian MalcolmPerhaps we will be like Dr. Jones, a little bit further down the path, Maybe with the strange little golden monkey from the first movie, Raiders of the Lost Ark. But either way, we will certainly be closer to God. We will be closer to that better tomorrow. And along the way, seriously, I don't think we'll be punching any of the Nazis, although that was Indiana Jones' villains.
Ian MalcolmBut perhaps, you know what we might find ourselves in? Is maybe a metaphorical book burning of those ideas and ideals that are poisoning our people. It's curiously a scene in that movie. I don't think it was in there necessarily to throw in any JQ tidbits, but Lucas did write that little piece where Indiana came across that certain Austrian painter.
Ian MalcolmWhat a weird connection. So look, in the event that I do not hold any spaces between now and that special time of year that's just a few short, not even days, almost hours at this point, less than 72 hours away, I want to wish everybody in here this continued journey, this continued path, we are moving towards something spectacular.
Ian MalcolmThe same way that we are towards the birth of that figure. So whether you think it's fiction, whether you think it's fact, that individual came down 2,000 years ago, or so the story goes, and the world was made much, much better for centuries by people who looked to that individual for motivation and for inspiration, and just like the Indiana Jones analogy, the end of that film, that cup, that everlasting chalice, it was that very modest piece of, what would you even call it, kitchenware?
Ian MalcolmI don't think it's fair to say that. Something righteous, right? We are all going to drink from that thing in a not-so-distant future. We just got to keep walking this little path each and every day. We will get there. I can almost promise you that. And I believe that because of all the things that we've done yesterday, today, and that we will do tomorrow.
Ian MalcolmRight? We hit 100,000. Yay, we did it. Maybe tomorrow will be 99. I hope that's the case. We'll all get a good laugh if so. But either way, we've made it here. I want to thank all of you for being part of this journey. I certainly want to thank the co-hosts. I want to thank Mr. Truthteller. I want to thank Colin. I want to thank Joanne.
Ian MalcolmI want to thank everybody that came up here. I even want to thank Yeats for what it's worth. Talk about the humor. For anybody that did not listen, feel free to go back to the beginning of the space. Feel free to fast forward to the middle. We had a Q&A with a Jewish individual. I was very, very curious. I hope everybody found it a lot of fun, and not only fun, but also in some way, shape, or form, invigorating, intellectually stimulating.
Ian Malcolmand ultimately uplifting because we will win. I can almost promise all of you that, if nothing else. And so to the best of your abilities, go out tomorrow, try to wake up a person or two, try to share something that is of value for this cause. And if nothing else, don't hate anybody because truth be told, we don't have to to win.
Ian MalcolmWe just have to continue pointing at the fact that if we keep walking, This insanity will end.
Ian MalcolmThe day is always darkest before the dawn. But then what occurs? The beautiful sunrise. And as it does, just know that as we approach that, the world will get better. We will get healthier. And listen to Mr. Truthteller for what it's worth. Not just on the JQ, but listen to him on health, on wellness. He's been doing spaces every day focused on this subject.
Ian MalcolmIt has been mind-blowing, some of the things that he's been sharing. There's been people that have come in, they've come up to the space, they've said that he has changed their life with some of the truths that he's speaking. And he changed mine a thousand percent. The things that I've learned from him are unbelievably valuable, so I just want to give a lot of love to him.
Ian MalcolmI want to give a love to everybody that's down in the listener panel, again, for being here, for being part of this journey, for being part of this space, this adventure, whatever it is. But I promise you all that we will win. I can't wait for that day. And in the interim, all these digital handshakes, all these digital hugs, they mean the world to me.
Ian MalcolmAnd so I just want to thank all of you for being part of this. 100,000 wonderful friends. Please, Nikita Pierre, please knock me down to 99 tomorrow. It'll make for a great, great, great laugh. I look forward to it when it happens. I look forward to all the conversations with everybody going forward. Like I promised, we're going to have some really good ones lined up for January.
Ian MalcolmAnd I say that not just because they're going to be fun, but because some of the guests that we're going to have, I sincerely believe 2026 is the year that this goes not mainstream because they will never allow that. But this will get to the point where everybody will have to start asking these questions. And as we do.
Ian MalcolmThey will start noticing these patterns. They will start asking, who is truth teller? They'll go to his page. They will be like, my mind is blown, right? We've got Neo. We've got Morpheus. We've got Trinity. It's not any of the accounts up here. It is all of us collectively. That's the biggest takeaway, right? 100,000, a million, 6 million.
Ian MalcolmNone of it matters if you don't have all of the little drops that make up that tidal wave that make up all of us, that make up all of our accounts. So I apologize for the rant. I apologize for this being long-winded, but I just want to thank all of you sincerely because this is a journey that at the end of the day is with all of us.
Ian MalcolmIt's not about any I's. It's not about any me's. It's about the collective we, and we will do this. We will find a better tomorrow, and I love all of you for everything that we are becoming. So lots of love. Again, I apologize for that long-winded rant, but as I always say, Good morning, good evening, good afternoon, wherever you are in the world.
Ian MalcolmI know for Raid, it's a beautiful morning, right? God bless for all that you all are. God bless us on this journey ahead. And just know that we are going to win. Merry, Merry Christmas. Happy holidays to those that don't support it. But to those that do, Merry Christmas. And I challenge you, it's one little thing. As you go out tomorrow, like I said, try to wake up people to this reality as best you can.
Ian MalcolmBut also hold a door for somebody. Here's your challenge for everybody. Hold one door for somebody that's older than you. Try to look at somebody's name tag if you go into a department store to maybe go shopping, to get a coffee, to get a Christmas gift. Look at the person's name and just say their name when you say thank you.
Ian MalcolmThank you, Tim. Thank you, Jane. Thank you, whatever. And say Merry Christmas as much as you can, as often as you can. And if anybody gives you a strange look or a second glance, Just say it again. Because a lot of people are going to be caught off guard by it, not because they're offended, but because they are so unaccustomed to it in this society.
Ian MalcolmWatch all of those old Christmas Carol movies. Look at all the Ebeneezer Scrooges of the world. The story at the end is always them saying Merry Christmas as loudly and proudly as you possibly can. So go out and do it. Do it for everybody because it'll make their day a little bit better. You know what they might turn around and do?
Ian MalcolmThey might say it to somebody else. So let's hold those doors, let's say thank yous, buy people's names as best we can, and let's say Merry Christmas to anybody and everybody to make their world better. You cannot fathom the power that all of us have to make the world a better place by just making a little bit of a difference.
Ian MalcolmSo, so much love to all of you. I'm sure I will speak with so many of you again, but in the event that I don't, Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good, good night.