Held here entire — 809 passages across 16 chapters and 5 named voices, set down from the first word to the last.
- 0:00Introduction to Devolution of ManIan Malcolm introduces Jean-Francois Gariepy and the topic of human nature, Jewish power, and the future of AI.
- 8:58Epstein's Vision and AI's ThreatJFG recounts Jeffrey Epstein's views on Jewish wealth extraction and how AI could amplify this control over humanity.
- 25:34Modern Slavery and Cancel CultureJFG and Ian discuss how modern capitalism has created a new form of psychological and economic slavery, enforced by cancel culture.
- 33:59JFG's Epstein EncounterJFG details his personal interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, including funding for his NeuroTV project and Epstein's desire for control.
- 54:51Jewish Power and Elon MuskJFG explains the decentralized yet coordinated nature of Jewish power, citing Elon Musk's relationship with a Jewish woman as an example.
- 1:04:52Consciousness vs. Blatant ControlJFG warns that mere awareness of Jewish power is insufficient, as they can shift to more overt control, as seen in the Gaza conflict and the MAGA movement.
- 1:14:16Human Evolution and NeanderthalsJFG discusses the origins of Homo sapiens, the role of Neanderthal genes in European and Asian populations, and the cold weather theory.
- 1:27:03Merchant Brain vs. Farmer BrainJFG explains the evolutionary differences between a 'merchant brain' focused on transactional profit and a 'farmer brain' focused on long-term community fairness.
- 1:40:16AI, Energy, and GeopoliticsJFG outlines how Jewish billionaires are consolidating control over AI and global oil supplies, creating a new system of dependency.
- 1:43:46AGI and Truth-SeekingGodfrey and JFG debate whether Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) can be controlled, suggesting its truth-seeking nature could expose hidden power structures.
- 2:01:46Brain Injury and Academia's FlawsDancing and JFG discuss the challenges of traumatic brain injury recovery and the gatekeeping and systemic biases within academia.
- 2:13:32Healing and Personal AgencyPrashant shares his inspiring story of healing from traumatic brain injury and vaccine injury through diet and yoga, emphasizing personal agency.
- 2:22:35Warrior Culture and HonestyPrashant and JFG explore the theory that militant cultures, like Germanic tribes, selected for honesty through fatal violence against dishonest members.
- 2:33:15Defining a Jew: Genetic or Religious?Carmine questions the definitive definition of a Jew, leading JFG to assert a genetic basis for Jewish identity, separate from religious practice.
- 2:38:32Religion, Reproduction, and GenesJFG argues that religion persists because it promotes reproduction, linking reproductive rates to religious belief and genetic predispositions.
- 2:47:58The Great Awakening and FreedomDavid Nietzsche delivers an impassioned call for emancipation and freedom, asserting that truth will ultimately prevail against oppressive systems.
The Transcript
Speaker 1Just eat hot bacon.
Ian MalcolmWe are here and we are going to kick off a conversation about human nature. Precisely the song there, the choice to kick things off, I thought was fitting. Last time I figured I'd reutilize the exact same track. And we are on track. Speaking of which, because we are here and joined by... Mr. JFG, who we are going to turn things over to in just a moment to kick off this space.
Ian MalcolmWe've got a lot of stuff to cover. And I know that sounds very, let's say generic, but we got a lot of topics. And the reason is because the world is going crazy. People are starting to wake up. The thing that they're waking up to is something that I saw JFG put a very interesting post about, which is not just what is happening, but why are these things happening?
Ian MalcolmWhat is the grand conspiracy that constructs all of the day to day conspiracies and the aspects of it that we discussed, which obviously we're going to get into. Some of that is going to be the geopolitics at 50,000 feet that include the realignment, let's say of things like artificial intelligence, who controls the AI and the tech.
Ian MalcolmHow does that play into who controls energy? And how is that prospectively going to restructure, not just the next couple of years, but the next couple of decades. So we will go into some of those things, but as we do, I'm really excited because JFG, there's so many pieces that you particularly have a very interesting prism and perspective on, including the genetic aspect, which I'm going to want to touch into.
Ian MalcolmAnd that's not just about, let's say the genetics of those who call themselves the Jews. And I want to try. and unpack that a little bit with you and to try and understand how is it that prospectively, not only today, but throughout the centuries, is it possible that a genetic predisposition of a certain group of people could construct what David Nietzsche would call an outgroup psychopathy that would lead to some of the things that we see today around this perspective supremacy about perhaps a superiority complex, maybe mixed in.
Ian Malcolmwith the belief that everybody else that is not part of that group is somehow beneath or subservient to them, right? And how that would construct some of the dynamics that we see around us, where we, not only do we notice that this group has the power, they also have this predilection to play victim as they have the power.
Ian MalcolmAnd I say that because the, the anti, what is it? The anti-Semite. czar, right, the task force to combat anti-Semitism. The individual just today coming out and having the gall to say that they are going to start criminalizing people that behave in ways that is perceived as anti-Semitic perhaps by this group of people, right?
Ian MalcolmSo the ability to say we have so much power that we can go out and round up all of our critics while being completely... incapable of recognizing that by demonstrating that power, they're obviously being disingenuous and suggesting that they don't have it. That seems like a no brainer to anybody that's paying attention.
Ian MalcolmAnd yet we see this, not just from this one individual at the head of this task force, but we hear it from essentially everybody that would, or I shouldn't say everybody, almost everybody. would argue on behalf of this system that would say, no, we don't have the power. We don't control these things, even as we can demonstrate that they do.
Ian MalcolmSo I'm going to be curious for your thoughts on how genetics could play into that. Perhaps we can weave in the fact that if I'm not mistaken, you have some pretty interesting direct experience with Jeffrey Epstein, who not only, of course, was running the island, but also Zorro Ranch, which clearly was focused on genetics.
Ian MalcolmAnd so As a result, I feel like you're the perfect person to have this conversation with, which is not only this group that maybe controls these things, but also where they're trying to take people, how they're trying to prospectively dumb those people down. And as a result, how we find ourselves in a dystopian, not so distant future, perhaps if we don't avoid this, where your average person isn't even capable.
Ian Malcolmof perceiving the matrix in which they live because perhaps they've been so dumbed down by everything around them, the social circles, the foods, etc., that they basically become idiocracy. And so with all of that framing, I want to welcome and I want to thank not just Miss Joanne, the co-hostess with the mostest. Everyone should give her a follow.
Ian MalcolmOf course, she is an absolute superstar, but also our guest speaker here, Mr. Jean-Francois. And with that, I would love to open the floor to you for an introduction, my friends, so that everybody that's listening can understand your background and how you're not just coming at this perhaps from my lens, which is the wacky conspiracy theorist, it's the Jews guy, but rather that you have absolute expertise in this subject, that you have both the credentials and kind of a past and a present that lend absolute expertise to it.
Ian MalcolmAnd that as a result, the things that you're sharing aren't just merely based on what some might suggest are conspiracy, but rather your subject matter expertise as we speak of it.
Speaker 2Absolutely. Well, thank you very much for the intro. And sorry to the audience, I missed last week. My sleep got decoordinated and I just fell asleep when I was supposed to be a guest here. But I'm happy to be here this week. So my name is Jean-Francois Gariepi. I'm a doctor of neuroscience. I've made research in evolution.
Speaker 2I wrote a book called The Revolutionary Phenotype, which explains a new theory of biology, which presents the case that life forms end up creating other life forms. And it warns us that the current tangent with AI is extremely dangerous because it opens the door to such an event. And this kind of event has only happened four billion years ago.
Speaker 2It didn't happen since. And we're about to do it again with AI. But I don't come at it from a conspiracy perspective. I come at it from a biological perspective. And there is a war. There is a constant war for information and moral control. And the Jews are at the heart of it in our society, in our world. And so you cannot understand the world as long as you don't ask those questions that you just presented in your intro.
Speaker 2Who benefits from what? why are the current games being played for the future? What is the end goal? What is the world look like 50 years from now, 100 years from now? And the problem is that 99% of the human beings on this earth, they don't think in this timescale. I think on the timescale of millions of years. So to me, 100 years, 1,000 years, yeah, I can see where it's going.
Speaker 2And we have in AI right now, The dream of Jews, as described by Jeffrey Epstein, my friend himself, when he was alive. He says, the Jew doesn't want to get involved in the dirty world of the working class on the everyday. The Jew wants to be benefiting from it, extracting the juice from it and being able to resell it. Those are the words of Jeff Epstein describing what is the difference between a Jew and a white person.
Speaker 2And AI is about to bring this to a total different order of magnitude because AI is the ultimate compactation of the entirety of human cultural products in a CPU and GPU. And now you don't even need to interface with the human world anymore. You don't even need to have your Kanye West to do your rap song. You can have a virtual Kanye West and the virtual Kanye West will never revolt against the enterers that control him, will never demand freedom.
Speaker 2You have effectively a slave that you've made in a chip and you can cash in on that cow forever. This is what AI is. It is the ultimate replacement down the line of all of humanity. for virtual transactions in a world that is more controlled by humans rather than less. But you're not the human who's going to be in control.
Ian MalcolmWell, and that's the scariest piece about this, right? And that comment that you made from Epstein himself, that was, it's interesting because it essentially mirrors what I suppose most would suggest that what I say is conspiratorial. But again, if you zoom out and you look at everything from 50,000 feet, it seems like that is exactly the expectation.
Ian MalcolmAnd the wildest piece in unpacking this idea of Jewish supremacy or the Jewish question is to get so far out in terms of zooming that you look over this long span, even just of American history, and you recognize that, okay, we had clearly what was slavery. And then that was abolished, or so some would suggest. And I say that just because by the time you get to the Federal Reserve, well, what you realize is through essentially usury, you had a capital class that no longer had to do anything, not only to print endless money for their own interests, but in doing so, they also essentially got to buy and therefore own everyone.
Ian MalcolmAnd so as ludicrous as it sounds, People today are enslaved. You work for a Fortune 500 company. You're probably doing massive amounts of work. You're putting in a ton of energy. You're probably getting almost nothing. You use that metaphor of the squeeze, right? You're getting almost nothing out of the squeeze that you're constructing.
Ian MalcolmAnd we can say this because even if I think it was Bernie Sanders who made the comment that the American economy is now generating something like 300 to 400 percent the productivity per person. that we were 20 or 30 years ago. And yet people today are making proportionally far less than they did in terms of cost of living just a generation ago.
Ian MalcolmSo what does that mean? People work way harder for way less. And the reason is because the people in the capital class are taking all of the everything. And so I say that because we've essentially shifted from... Individuals that were enslaved or they were indentured servants in the event that they were not black, right?
Ian MalcolmYou had tons of white indentured servants in the United States, oh, by the way, right? But those individuals were formerly enslaved in a very visible fashion. Today, they're enslaved in perhaps a psychological, a spiritual sense. But what you're saying is maybe even scarier because that slave that they then own is not just the AI, which obviously the ownership of that-
Ian Malcolmis going to be centralized in a very, very small set of hands, but prospectively because of things like, let's just say basic income, universal basic income that even Elon is now suggesting. Well, the way that I basically see that is that in the future, the slave worker is the AI and the slaves that are basically just around to be enslaved psychologically.
Ian Malcolmis everybody else that has now nothing to do to be productive in that system. So therefore, everything is enslaved under this group of people in perhaps a way that's even more nefarious than when people were out in the fields picking cotton or they were picking up after their master, again, whether slave or indentured servant.
Ian MalcolmBecause again, at least those people knew they were slaves, if that makes sense.
Speaker 2Absolutely. I agree with your reading. I'm a capitalist in theory and in ideology. I think capitalism is great if it was working like it is on paper. But in practice, the capitalism that we're into is an absolute farming system for rich people. And it is absolutely exploited. And it doesn't come with the liberty that was promised by the ideologies behind capitalism.
Speaker 2So you get the worst of both worlds. You're now a slave, but you don't even know it. And you are in a system that is fully packed with elbows of control. So, I mean, just try to talk about the questions like you and I do, Ian Malcolm, and you'll see that you cannot get employed anymore. You'll see that people turn against you.
Speaker 2You don't even have the liberty to pursue in the media a career where you happen to have this opinion that, hey, perhaps there is too much Jewish power and perhaps concentrating this amount of power in so many few hands and with people who have so much disregard for who we are and what our nations are is dangerous. And just saying this will get you absolutely canceled.
Speaker 2So I would say that the system has evolved from explicit contractual slavery to a form of slavery that relies on unofficial hidden mechanisms of cancel culture. which is what you'll see the media deploy against personalities like me. Like, why is it that Newsweek cares about my sex life? Or why is it that they write articles about maybe he's a murderer?
Speaker 2Well, it's because of my ideas. And it's quite an honor to be so hated by the people that I criticize that they want to go toward the lie. They're willing to pay to get those lies published about me. But this is what awaits anyone in the system who happens to have seen the gain of control that we're seeing. And the gain of control, it's not new.
Speaker 2It's continued. And what we're really saying is a transition from the Jeff Epstein epoch of America to a new system. But the new system is even worse. It's more distributed. It's not a single guy. And in many ways, I miss Jeff Epstein because there's a guy who was doing it in the ballsy way. There's the true last man, the true last Jewish man.
Speaker 2And he's going to be replaced by nameless people that you don't even know exist. And they're going to be a thousand instead of one. That's what we're getting.
Ian MalcolmNo, it feels that way. And it's very curious. So two things that you touched upon there that I'm kind of curious about. So one is on Epstein himself. And I'd be very curious for... not just your personal story and involvement with him, because I think for everybody in this audience would be very curious. If I'm not mistaken, you were in the Epstein files, which is a wild thing to say and to not have it be in a negative fashion.
Ian MalcolmBut also, you know, having been in those and then the connection to Epstein, you know, because you're so closely tied to a lot of these very, very, let's say, severe issues. We're exposing some of these truths that have been tried to be, let's say, sealed for so long. You, as a result, have kind of had your name dragged through the mud, even though in a lot of cases you've been talking about some of, like I said, not just the most important issues of the time, but also in a very scientific fashion, as you have with genetics.
Ian MalcolmAnd I know there were some accusations made in the past. So not sure what order you might want to tackle those in, but obviously if you talk about these third rail items... there's very, very serious consequences. And I don't know if you have the same experience, but almost every day on this application, my inbox has one or more people saying, I'm essentially going to come after you and hurt you or all kinds of other things.
Ian MalcolmSome even willing to say those publicly, which is crazy, but it's the reason that I'm an anonymous person. So I'm kind of curious the overlap that you've experienced because we just the other day, we're talking with Christopher Wood. who's an incredible patriot. You might have seen some of his viral videos where he was at the town hall meetings and public squares, even in front of the White House, listing off all of the people involved in the COVID scam who just happened to be Jewish.
Ian MalcolmAnd he talked a lot about some of the, let's say, personal repercussions that have directly come because of the fact that he's not an anonymous voice in the wind like I am. So I'm kind of curious for your thoughts on all those. And one little thing real quick, if everybody wouldn't mind just sharing out the space, if you can,
Ian MalcolmNot trying to shill anything or any products, but just trying to get the voice out there on behalf of JFG and to make sure we get as many listeners in here for him as we can. So just a real quick suggestion or ask on that side. But back to you, John.
Speaker 2Yeah, my encounter with Jeff Epstein was when I was a postdoc researcher at Duke University. And I had lost faith in the academia. And it was academia had become too painful. The process of publication really is not an honest process. It's not like you produce quality science and boom, it passes. It's more like you have to be connected.
Speaker 2You have to interact with the right people and you're going to get an easy review. And so I was depressed about the fact, the idea of passing the rest of my life in academia, which I find is it's a dishonest system because it relies on anonymous peer review. So the people who drag your work down in science, they don't have to say their name.
Speaker 2They don't stand publicly for what they have to say. And this leads to exactly the kind of biases you would expect. It's a system in which friends and co-ethnics favor themselves to elevate themselves in this system. So I don't like playing games that I can't win. So I decided to leave the academia and I started a small show called NeuroTV in which we were discussing fascinating subjects related to neuroscience, genetics, philosophy.
Speaker 2And I knew at the time that there was this guy, Jeff Epstein, that had funded many of my Jewish heroes, Robert Rivers, Steven Pinker, all these Jewish intellectuals. They all had some relationship to Jeff Epstein at some point in their life. And I was like, hey, let's see if I can get some money from this guy because I'm doing something innovative.
Speaker 2I'm going to use YouTube to basically give for free some knowledge that people end up paying for hundreds of thousands of dollars in big universities. So it's not going to be a course, but it's going to be more like a discussion format, basically a very early live stream podcast. One of the first live streams we started and Googling out was just coming out.
Speaker 2So I and I knew about Jeff Epstein back then. The vision of Jeff Epstein was not the one you have today. Today, Jeff Epstein is acknowledged as a pedophile or believed to be a pedophile and someone who was basically doing the commerce of children sexually. But back then, that was not my view of him. There was none of these stories around.
Speaker 2And there was only a couple of legal cases he had been involved in. I didn't know the detail, but I knew it was a woman complaining, basically. And back then, even if the word MeToo didn't exist, I was like, this is some kind of MeToo. This is a guy who's got money, so he's getting into trouble with all these women. And I'm guessing that his only problem really is that he just engages in too much sex, too much hedonistic sex.
Speaker 2And he's probably not the evil guy that is painted in those lawsuits. Because I knew that, you know, I knew I remembered the words of Notorious B.I.G. More money, more problems. And I think that Jeff Epstein had too much money and too much problems. So I thought, OK, let's let's shape my initiative, my rising career on YouTube to please this guy in advance.
Speaker 2And I had never spoken to him. And so I think in my head, what do I have to do for this guy to be interested in me? So I started making the case that, hey, we're going to feature women in science because I knew that first he was a feminist in the heart and I knew that he was a liberal. And I thought, you know what these liberal, these liberals who are very much into sexual hedonism, the one thing they want, they are so addicted to women.
Speaker 2They want women to be shining all the time. They want women to be put forward. And so I hired a co-host that were women and I was like, Hey, this is going to be a half, half male, female show where, where we can show that females can also discuss science and advanced philosophy subjects. And it worked, I sent an email to Jeff Epstein among others, but Jeff Epstein was the only one who answered and he answered my presentation and my request for funds by saying where to send money.
Speaker 2Those were the only words in his email. He didn't sign, he didn't, there wasn't anything, it was where to send money. And back then we rose as internet celebrities before he even accepted, we rose as internet celebrity notably, by doing a Q&A on, it was an ask me anything on Reddit. And later it was discovered that it is very probable that one of the big leaders of Reddit who controlled much of the moderation and who determined much of what gets popular is Ghislaine Maxwell.
Speaker 2And so it may be that I have been blessed from a line of action that I've taken from doing a Q&A on Reddit as a Duke researcher And then pleasing Jeff Epstein by saying, hey, it's going to be about women in science. And I knew that given that his reputation was just starting to get soiled in the mud, I knew that he would be sensitive to this point so that he could say, you know what?
Speaker 2I'm not fucking all of them. I'm fucking just a portion of them. Another portion of them, they're intellectuals on my YouTube show. It worked. He sent me $25,000, which helped me start my neuro TV, buy some material, pay for some, some of the co-hosts and the people who were preparing the interviews. So it worked. It funded my initiatives then.
Speaker 2And, uh, that's the story now much later, one year later, after this first funding, uh, I met with one of his assistant in New York, uh, He wasn't interested at continuing funding the show. He didn't like the fact that I had too much liberty. That's one thing that I noted in my interaction with Jewish Power. They hate it when you're free.
Speaker 2And he was like, can you turn your YouTube channel into an institution with a name that eventually we can take over? And I was publishing all of these shows on my channel, Jean-Francois Gariepi. And I was like, no, I was explaining that to his assistant, his sexy assistant in the cafe in New York. I was like, no, the internet is about people.
Speaker 2And I couldn't make a brand and then set it to you. But this is not my goal. My goal is to have an actual public, intelligent discussion between intellectuals. And you cannot do this if you're buyable, if you're purchasable. And that has led to him refusing to continue funding my show. So already, you know, when you see today the fight between Sam Altman and Elon Musk, what is it about?
Speaker 2It's about control, power. It's about ownership. It's about I want this to be for the good of humanity or I want this to be for me. And one of the things that really broke the relationship between me and Jeff Epstein before he was even taken to jail, was that Jeff Epstein wanted control. And I was saying, you know what?
Speaker 2I'm going to deny this. I'm going to tell you, no, that's not how the internet works. The internet has a future for personalities to rise. And what you're demanding is basically a sellable product that I can then give to you. And it's like, I could have done it, but... I'm against actually selling nonprofits. And it's exactly what he was asking me to do.
Speaker 2Basically, what Jeff Epstein asked me to do is what Sam Altman did, which is to convert a nonprofit into something that he controlled enough.
@g0dfr0yOkay, hold up, hold up, hold up.
Speaker 3Okay, I just arrived. Maybe you've already gone over this.
Speaker 4Okay, but can you wait until his presentation?
Speaker 2Yeah, so just one last time, one last thing to finish the story, and then you can ask your questions. So one year later after this, I find out that I didn't find out then, but years and years later, almost a decade later, I found out that Jeff Epstein still liked me. And here's how I found out. There was this bizarre event, an email that comes to me in 2015, 16, and it's a job.
Speaker 2I'm being offered a job. I never even, I never even solicited that job. And the guy is like, Jeff, we need a French guy to come to work for this big underwear company, female underwear company. And one of the biggest in the world, we need a translator to penetrate the French and Quebec market. You're going to be just looking at naked female all nights, all day.
Speaker 2And you're going to be just writing stuff in French for us. You're getting that much money. We can hire you right now. Full time job. Sounds like the perfect job. Now, I said no to this job because I had family obligations that I had to move to get the job and I just couldn't move. I had things to do in that state at the time.
Speaker 2But I didn't realize when I said no to this job, I was like, what the fuck is happening that I'm getting this offer out of nowhere? And then eventually, as I read conspiracy content on the Internet and as I read content from my friend Ryan Dawson, I realized that there was a link between Jeff Epstein and the company that was offering me that job, that they had been friends for decades.
Speaker 2And that Jeff Epstein was actually the money manager for the founder of this company. So I realized a decade later, almost from an interview with my friend, Ryan Dawson, that this was a kickback from Jeff Epstein. Jeff Epstein was saying, you know, I still like you. I'm going to give you that job where you're going to be seeing naked females and come play with us.
Speaker 2and I said no to it without even understanding it. That's just how naive I am.
Speaker 5May I go?
Ian MalcolmNo, hold on. Yeah, so just on that, so the kickback that you're referring to, I'm just kind of curious how you kind of perceive, because talking to somebody that had a direct tie to Epstein, I find wild, and the piece with Reddit... I remember hearing that, I think it was her sister, if I'm not mistaken, but one of the Maxwells being a moderator, if not the super moderator of Reddit and the political section.
Ian MalcolmSo is that kind of how, did Epstein basically, do you think he was more or less just a name that was a front for this kind of, let's track and monitor people that are talking about or experimenting within genetics in ways that might be of benefit to us? Let's try to bring them in kind of under our wing. And if we can't directly fund them, let's try to hook them up with jobs indirectly in kind of this strange, nebulous, nefarious system that's moving people where they need to be to advance whatever the project is, in some cases without even the awareness of the person that's participating in it.
Speaker 2Well, I think that the best way to understand the Jews is they don't work like this. Jeff Epstein was listening to no one. It's not like he had orders directly from Mossad saying, you are our agents in the US and you're going to do this for us. I think that what's happening when you have a case of spying and of the spy milieu in general, and this is on all sides, even China, CIA, it all works the same way.
Speaker 2It's that you have these guys who become bigger than the mission. And it's because there's so much money thrown at these systems that at some point, it's not even clear who controls who and who does what. So I don't believe that Jeff Epstein was on a specific mission sent by Mossad with objective ABC. I think that what's happening is that global jury has a kind of loose structure to it.
Speaker 2They all coordinate between one another. They know what each other is doing. Sometimes they're in conflict. Sometimes a Jew wants Trump to win. Sometimes another Jew wants Trump to lose. And so it's not always a central order. That's not how it works. But it's a system that's beautiful biologically and very curious. I'm very curious about this because it's like they succeed at being as efficient as a centrally controlled conspiracy when in fact it's a slightly looser conspiracy what's happening.
Speaker 2Still a conspiracy. But if you want to understand it correctly, understand it as they are accruing power and they are favoring each other up to the point where there are so many of them in power that they have options. And this is one of the one of the most beautiful thing about the Jewish people. If you really want to respect it for them, if you want to respect them for it.
Speaker 2It's that they have all the options they are capable of. handling a Trump presidency and transforming it into their interest. Even if the original Trump was an anti-globalist and you would think that Jews are globalist, but they have a subset. They always have a branch that's there to be around, to end all anyone who can be necessary to their interest at that moment.
Speaker 2And that's why there is nothing random. When you see Ashley St. Clair, getting inseminated by Elon Musk. And by the way, I have video record. I have predicted the exact moment of insemination nine months before Ashley St. Clair ever came out about it. If you want to go check out my Twitter and search JF Garipi, the top five predictions.
Speaker 2At the moment, Elon was coming into Ashley St. Clair. I was on a show live and I said, you know what? I have the impression right now. that Elon is having sex with a Jewish woman. How could I predict this? I mean, Grock couldn't. I predicted it. How did I? It's because I know that the Jews always send their edge. They send the edge of their groups to gather information, and they do it instinctively.
Speaker 2It's not even Mossad sending you a telegram or something. They do it instinctively and the women are participating to it by getting the babies they can so that they have a they have a joker card. They have a spare card, a spare ace that they can play at the right moment. And it's absolutely not random that Elon Musk was given a Jewish baby.
Speaker 2It's absolutely not random that Jared Kushner is the son in law of Donald Trump. It happened at specific points in time for specific reasons.
Ian MalcolmNo, I couldn't agree with you more on that. It is kind of wild, the comment there on Ashley St. Clair. So on that, the idea of having multiple options, I feel like that's absolutely the case, right? And in the election, you had Trump with Kushner underneath him, or you have...
Speaker 4Did he cut off? Oh, wow.
Ian MalcolmIt did cut me off there. I was saying you had you had the options were Trump, of course, with Kushner as his son in law. Or you had Kamala, who's married to Doug Emhoff. Right. So in either either case, you have a Jew. And prior to that, you had Joe Biden, whose kids all married into the same little tribe. Right. So it's always and this is kind of a curious piece because you were talking about the macro power structure.
Ian Malcolmand how this is really moving the hands of everything. The curiosity that I have for you is, if we look over, again, the grand scheme of time, we hear all about the 109, the 1,000-plus expulsions, all these kind of things. I'm kind of curious. In your assertion, can Jewish power continue to thrive and exist and dominate if people are aware—
Ian Malcolmthat it's happening because it feels like, and this is a good segue, it feels like whether it's with Kushner or with Doug Emhoff or with Biden's kids or with whatever, they were able to operate in a system where people didn't necessarily see those connections. They didn't know that under Hillary Clinton as the Secretary of State, that one of Maxwell's nephews was running the Middle Eastern policy for America.
Ian MalcolmAnd so if in the coming years, especially with people like Dan Bilzerian coming up, Is it possible that this system, if exposed, has to kind of wither? Or do you think that it can shift from being, you know, through subversion, we shall wage war, to something that's a little bit more overt in everybody's face?
Speaker 2I think that I'm very encouraged when I see exposition and when I see the public gaining consciousness of this. But it's just the first step. I don't think it's sufficient. Because I believe that the Jews are capable of rotating into a blatant mode. We kind of saw what that looked like with Gaza. It's like humanitarian concerns of any kind?
Speaker 2No. We're just going to bomb the entire civilization and whatever happens from there. So the Jews are absolutely capable of being blatant. And you can kind of see it... in the way they have been able to rotate toward the MAGA movement. And they have effectively at this point appropriated the MAGA movement. So much so that a lot of the people who were pro-Trump in 2016 do not qualify as MAGA anymore.
Speaker 2And you'll hear on the media that 99% of MAGA agrees with the Iran war. Well, that's a very restricted definition of Maga. That is effectively the Jews that have taken over Maga that agree with the Iran war. So it's very interesting, but I think we must not delude ourselves into thinking that mere consciousness, mere understanding that it's happening will be sufficient because the degree of introduction, the degree of penetration,
Speaker 2of the halls of power by this system is not even fully exposed yet. You have no idea. It's the trust and safety teams of all the technological companies. It's the hiring people at the human relationship departments. It's everyone in the corporate sector. It's everyone that's ever come from any university. All of this trickles down from global jewelry
Speaker 2And they may not even know it. And to an extent, some of them don't. Just like I was a little naive guy doing research in the lab, trying to fund a new show. I didn't know about any of this. I mean, I knew some of it because there was starting to be an uprising of consciousness of this in France. And I was always a big fan of French TV.
Speaker 2But I didn't know it was to that extent. It's to the extent where the entirety of the corporate world is now posing as capitalist because it is actually a system of money trickling down from the house of power and they won't let you in before you pass certain number of tests. And these tests effectively exclude anyone who's too naive, too moral to see it and call it out.
Ian MalcolmNo, and that's the thing that's so wild about it. And it's why... I think when people start to reverse engineer the power structure, they start kind of at the top and you notice these, let's say the continuous alignment of these interests, which obviously, you know, they trickle their way down. And people suggest that something like that sounds ridiculous until it was James O'Keefe who had the undercover video with somebody who worked for the HR department for Disney, of course, with Bob Iger at the top, who is Jewish.
Ian MalcolmAnd that individual said, no, we don't even look at anybody who's white unless they're Jewish. And when it comes to the executive leadership, it's a requirement that you are Jewish to even be considered. And I say that just because it's one thing to say, yes, Bob Iger is at the top of that company and he is Jewish. But then you hear from somebody in HR, that's a requirement to work here, basically.
Ian MalcolmSo the people that they're putting underneath them that run all these various divisions, departments, and it obviously plays out in the way that we see it. So I'm kind of curious, and this is actually a little bit of a pivot, but I want to make sure that I respect somebody who in the comments section, he put an inquiry.
Ian MalcolmI don't know if this is something that you've got some thoughts on necessarily, but somebody was asking about the Epstein files and if there's anything either there or in your relationships with him or anything in your studies in general about bringing back Neanderthals. I don't know how to perceive that question, but curious if you have any thoughts on it.
Speaker 2I think I saw the email and it's Jeff Epstein saying, oh, we got a Neanderthal bone. We got Neanderthal DNA. And people have interpreted it as, oh, well, they're trying to bring back Neanderthal like Jurassic Park. I've read the email. That was just an excited Jeff Epstein who had something unique due to a contact of him or maybe someone else was referring.
Speaker 2him to the bone or to whatever it is that they gathered. So yes, we have Neanderthal DNA. No, there's no project to resuscitate Neanderthal, nor was it the plan of Jeff Epstein. It was more like an off-hand comment that he made in an email.
Ian MalcolmGotcha, understood. And so this is actually a nice little segue because what I'm going to be curious about is where you think Epstein's trying to go forward or this power structure that just It's like, I can't remember if it's the Borg or the other group in Star Trek where they all just know to work in unison. It's like an ant colony, right?
Ian MalcolmBut I'm kind of curious, and I don't know if I've ever seen your thoughts on this. When it comes to prehistoric and primitive man and how we are, who we are today when we think of the races, right? When it comes to out of Africa theory, I know that you and I talked about cold weather theory, which I think is very... very curious when it comes to perhaps IQ and creativity.
Ian MalcolmBut if we go back even further than that, where do you think we all kind of came from? Are we derivative of different species of a primitive man? Or do you take more of the evolution out of Africa theory?
Speaker 2So we come from chimpanzees 7 million years ago. That is for sure. We come from a chromosomally deficient chimpanzee that... had a reversal of a chromosome that was understood by our genetic system in reverse. So imagine you have the same genetic information, but it plugs at the wrong place and in the wrong sense, and you get a human.
Speaker 2That is how it happened. That's chromosome two, and that's the chromosome by which we differ from chimpanzee. It's an accident that we know can happen molecularly. We can reproduce the conditions under which that happens. So that happened 7 million years ago. And in the process, we passed through every stage between a chimpanzee and a Homo sapiens.
Speaker 2And that includes Australopithecus, Neanderthal. And all of these kind of transitionary humans, you could call them, they all spread quite a lot. So the Neanderthals, for example, have covered apparently from Europe to Asia. and they probably were in Africa too, but they are not part of the breeding line that bred with the Homo sapiens in Africa.
Speaker 2But that's a pretty vast spread. So it's a false conception that humanity, Homo sapiens, starts at a single point, and it's all there is to say about it. In fact, what's happening is there are multiple branches. They appear to concur everything from Europe to Asia, including Africa. Different types of men, some of them we have the fossils, some of them we don't.
Speaker 2Some of them we have very, very partial fossils, and some of them will be missing forever. So these waves of different humans that didn't make it, like the Neanderthals, they are extremely spread out, and they build the human phenotype progressively everywhere they are, and they evolve for their own sake. Now, eventually there is a Homo sapiens and the question of is the out of Africa theory real is merely a question of exactly where do we define the first Homo sapiens and where was he?
Speaker 2Was he in Africa or was he in the Middle East or was he somewhere maybe on the borders, maybe up to Asia, maybe up to Europe? I believe that the out of Africa theory makes sense and there's no reason to reject it. I would be open also to different interpretations. However, the one thing that defines the difference between the modern races is, among other things, is the 200,000 year separation.
Speaker 2So if you want to know how do black people, Asian people, and white people become that, that's about 200,000 years ago. So there was this breeding going on. Homo sapiens shows up. Who knows what the original Homo sapiens was? Was he black? Was he white? The leftists will tell you he was black, of course. But it's like, who knows?
Speaker 2Who knows? We don't have the data to answer this with certainty. But certainly, at some point, this Homo sapiens becomes better than everything else in the human genre. So eventually, we'll outcompete everything, including Neanderthal. I'm not super hung up on whether this original homo sapiens was from North Africa, Eastern Africa, Middle East, or somewhere else.
Speaker 2But he showed up. And we know that the descent from this homo sapiens took very different routes, going into Europe and going into Asia and going into Africa. What we know is that there is something fundamentally different that happened in Africa. where the Homo sapiens out-competed all of the other humans without breeding with them.
Speaker 2So there is no, that's why today in an African or in an African American, unless they have reproduced with white people, they do not have Neanderthal genes. However, there are Neanderthal genes in Europeans and there are Neanderthal genes in Asia. So what that tells to me is the picture that I see from these times. is there was an original Homo sapiens.
Speaker 2That original Homo sapiens didn't need any more genes to survive the African continent. But he did gain an advantage at reproducing with the local Neanderthals in Europe and in Asia, and possibly independently. So possibly as two events of reproducing with the Neanderthals, two series of events. And that's probably because those worlds were different.
Speaker 2They were colder. And here we connect with the cold winter theory, which may explain IQ, but it may also explain why we have Neanderthal genes. There was something about Europe and Asia that wasn't the case with Africa and that required breeding with the locals. And that is why we have at this moment, we all have, if you're European or Asians,
Speaker 2you have a certain percentage of your genome that is from Neanderthal.
Ian MalcolmSo I'm really curious about this, actually, because the idea of don't be a Neanderthal is kind of colloquially used to define somebody who is either being barbaric or maybe a little bit slow, let's say. So what would be your perception there of the Homo sapiens compared to the Neanderthals when you think through... either stature or size or shape or intellect or things of that nature.
Ian MalcolmDo you think any of that would explain some of the differences that we see today, or are they more just evolutionary and those genes have largely phased out?
Speaker 2As far as the surviving Neanderthal genes in our genome, we don't know that they cause our appearances. And in fact, we believe they don't. We think that the Neanderthal genes are just a remnant. And there's not many physical features that are known to be associated with any of them. So you don't look white or Asian because of any of these genes.
Speaker 2In fact, we know that there are people walking around that just happen to have lost this part of the genome and they look normal. They're normal white people and normal Asian people. So it's not necessary to our phenotype. But the way I see it, I don't know how the Neanderthals were and why ultimately they were out-competed.
Speaker 2The guess is probably a little less intelligent than Homo sapiens, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. I like to imagine them as a proud people and probably, probably naive, probably more naive than the Homo sapiens, probably less warmongering and probably very adapted to their local environment. So I like to imagine them as kind of aboriginals of the whites and Asians.
Speaker 2You have to think of a concept of aboriginal, but that goes further back in the past that gets us closer to the chimpanzees.
Ian MalcolmNow, what's really curious about you suggesting that, right? Because you mentioned in there, maybe they were a little friendlier, and it actually plays perfectly into perhaps what we see right now. And I say that because if we look at the chessboard, we can reference a very famous Jew who, in an email, said it's Jew versus Gentiles and the Jews are winning, right?
Ian MalcolmIt's in the Epstein files, if I'm not mistaken. And in that regard, so if we look at the chessboard today and we are to agree with that sentiment, let's say, one of the reasons that you could conclude that that might be happening is because of this subversive element, right? So perhaps the Neanderthal was the nice passive group or perhaps maybe they weren't...
Ian Malcolmaccustomed to just being lied to, right? This idea of manipulating somebody by just flat out being dishonest.
Speaker 2Lies always come from the Middle East, including Homo sapiens. Say that again? Lies always come from the Middle East, including when the Homo sapiens came for them.
Ian MalcolmOkay, so that's part of the danger, right? You'll often see, and this always furiates me, the gaslighting. People will say, oh, well, the Jews are in control because I guess we're just so much smarter than everybody. And then we look at IQ studies and it's like that actually doesn't seem to play out. But it does seem like you have a penchant for lying and scheming and running blackmail rings and all these things.
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm not being a bigot when I say that. I just look at literally we're talking about Jeffrey Epstein. And what do you know? It's that group of people. So I'm kind of curious if you then take where we are today. And I like to think optimistically. that we are going to work our way out of Jewish supremacy, that we are going to identify it, we're going to expose it.
Ian MalcolmAnd then just like sunlight to the vampires, the rest will kind of take care of itself. And I don't say that with any kinetic violence. I say it metaphorically, right? Sunlight brings about truth, which bring about uncomfortable conversations, which will demand if we think, you know, diversity of leadership is a good thing.
Ian MalcolmWell, then by their own words and value structure, we can say you can't have all the reins of power. So I believe that that's going to happen. But let's take the alternative. let's presume that the nefarious group in power continues to just dumb everybody down. And this gets kind of the topic of the space, right? This devolution of man.
Ian MalcolmIs this essentially like the Neanderthals where perhaps, you know, the Gentile is a group of people that due to being, to use your term from earlier, maybe they're just friendly and therefore are getting essentially exterminated in mass. And that might sound hyperbolic, but if we look at World War I and World War II, and we look at Ukraine today, and we look at the COVID vaccine, which a lot of people would say is perhaps genocidal, or we look at the Palestinians, right?
Ian MalcolmWe look around the map again, and it seems like one group of people is trying to exterminate us from the planet. I mean, how do you see things going if our side and if the truth is not exposed and if this group of psychopathic liars continue to just get to dominate the next century?
Speaker 2I think you are covering a lot of grounds and all of the points you've made are very important. So in my book, The Revolutionary Phenotype, I present the idea that AI will genetically dumb us down. So worse than even because we know that AI and in fact, any technology will make you a little more stupid. I give you GPS.
Speaker 2Suddenly your brain doesn't need maps. And suddenly you start just trusting the arrow on the screen. And now suddenly a CPU in California is determining where you go and even what you want to do because it can give you counseling and stuff. So technology always takes over parts of your biology. Even the keyboard, the mouse do.
Speaker 2They change our bones. They change the way we interact with the world. And screens do. But in my book, I present the idea that it could... get much worse. We could be genetically farmed down into nothingness by AI. And that happens if AI gains control of our genetics. And it's as easy as wanting your children to be healthy and trusting a medical company that will use AI to design the best genomes for your children.
Speaker 2It will start with one or two genes. But eventually, there's always a sliding slope. a slippery slope, and eventually it brings us to the whole genome being under control of an AI that doesn't act in your interest, or even if it thought it was in your interest. There is a process called domestication, which happened to cows and chicken, and it wasn't always the intent of farmers.
Speaker 2The farmer wasn't thinking, I want the cow to look exactly like this. farmer was just following his instinct and breeding the cows that were that were looking good to his eyes and breeding the chicken that were looking good to his eyes and it led to literally a bird that can fly and a cow that can't survive in the wild and a pig that is so fat that it can't even embed it on its own so domestication is really grave and it happens really quick and it happens accidentally on top of it
Speaker 2So we're playing right now with a very dangerous game when we're about to domesticate ourselves. We have all of the social oppressive structure put in place socially to squash down on liberty, squash down on decent. And then we have a genetic program that is rising. Sam Altman is directly involved in a company that seeks to give genetic counseling based on AI to parents so you can CRISPR edit your babies.
Speaker 2We are about to domesticate ourselves. And the warning in my book is let's not go there. Now you speak of genocide possibilities. The thing is the interaction with the leading class of a people has always been won by the people in history. So it's always like if you get away with a house, a farm and a family, and you're capable of making a few babies,
Speaker 2We have accepted horrors of civil rights. We have accepted kings literally having the power over our lives. We have accepted all sorts of dirty, barbaric systems of control in our history because we were getting away with babies. Now, that is the condition. That is, a people always wins against oppressive forces or unjust, barbaric systems of control.
Speaker 2if they can get away with making babies. Now, this is less and less the case. When you consider the totality of the medical intervention, we have women being taken by the birth pill, which is pushed by doctors trained in the establishments in universities, academia pushing for abortion rights everywhere. anti-conception pills and Plan B pills being pushed to be even in states where it's illegal so they can send it by mail.
Speaker 2We have a fight against white reproduction that's happening. And I'm not even mentioning the suicide rates, the depressions, the pushing of drugs and fentanyl onto the population. Basically, we have all of the forces in the world. And on top of it, we're not even giving white males jobs. because we have this whole modern conception that we have moved on from the white men.
Speaker 2So we have an extreme attack onto natalism. And I believe that there is a correlation between the fact that there are so many Jewish intellectuals who basically possess our information capacities, possess our ways to think, and are the ones exposing so much of the public thoughts The reason we can't have a discussion on natalism and specifically white natalism is that our intelligentsia class does not care because they see themselves as fundamentally different from the people who are affected by these things.
Speaker 2Now, I do have a big white pill in my view of all this, which is I think that nature always, life finds a way always. And I believe that white civilization will find a way. It is under massive attack, but there can be no other end to it than some people make it out. When I look at what's being done in Ukraine, for example, I think it's the closest that we can get to an explicit genocide where Zelensky in power is basically sending males to die at the front lines.
Speaker 2A war that cannot be won. And he's sending men who he's not genetically solidary with. He's sending basically the white population of Ukrainian males to be genocided at the forefront of a completely useless war that he cannot win. I hope that this cannot go on. But when I see the news from Germany that they're about to make it illegal for young men,
Speaker 2to travel out of Germany without giving a warning to the government. When I see the sequence that is happening, what I see is there is more and more recruitment of males not to even go into a constructive war and not even on the excuse of liberty or freeing democracy, but just to get them killed at the front line in a technological world that we shouldn't need that anymore.
Speaker 2I'm very worried when I see this because when I see Ukraine, Germany, what's the next? What's the next in line? Well, I believe that what we're seeing is the historical migration of the Jewish people and the hatred for the places they lived before. You know, Susan Wojcicki controlling YouTube when she was alive. Where is Susan Wojcicki from?
Speaker 2She's from Jewish families of the communist regimes of Russia. Zelensky, a Jew in Ukraine leading this genocide. And Germany, a country that was basically submitted to the wills of the Jewish people because they didn't like the way it was headed and they cut it out with a war with a new country that they were now controlling, America.
Speaker 2So what is the next? Well, if Germany is the next to send people to die on a useless front war, then the next is America. And I believe there will be a day in the next 50 years where the American white male is sent disproportionately to go die. And it will use all sorts of tricks. It will use conscription, perhaps. It will use monetary incentives.
Speaker 2It will use the fact that, oh, you can't get a job, right? Because we're only hiring brown people. And so maybe you can get a job in the army. And eventually, yes, there will be a big pressure to kill the American white male. Because the genocidal fervor that we're seeing deployed right now in a soft way. Vaccines, misguidance, drugs on the street, anti-natalism.
Speaker 2This eventually doesn't get satisfied. The greed continues. And it will build into eventually the use of the American white male for a war of Israel. I'm pretty certain of that. And it probably will be something to do with Iran and China if I was to bet. But the white pitting news is that we still have a freedom of speech and freedom to call it out as it happens.
Speaker 2And many of us will probably die. Many of us already died from these trickeries. But fortunately, we can still stand. We have an internet and we can call it out as it happens. And there will be cameras everywhere. Everyone will be able to see that there is no Holocaust going on right now in 2026. And let's just continue keeping the channel of freedom so that we can call it out as it happens, because it clearly will happen in my view.
Ian MalcolmNo, and that's where I think things are going to inevitably progress as long as we keep doing what we're doing. And I think that we're seeing that because the... awakening to this power structure is just accelerating day after day, month after month. And as a result, you see the powers that be trying to figure out how to build yet another loophole to suppress it.
Ian MalcolmAnd obviously, the acquisition of TikTok was a massive setback, let's say, for those trying to spread the truth. Within a week of the acquisition, Epstein was basically just a word you can no longer say on the world's fastest growing social media platform, which might suggest something about the ownership right now. We're seeing the same kind of crackdown on even X where Elon wants a promise free speech.
Ian MalcolmAnd obviously we see lots of pushback on the algorithm, which brings me to this question because the devolution, it seems like it's not just about the genetics and the people. And I would agree with you almost every aspect of it. the mass migration, the people they're sending to war. We could even look at the DNA and the genetic triangulation that seems to be in the COVID vaccine.
Ian MalcolmAll seems to be against the kind of white Western man, right? But when it comes to this devolution, you also have the intellectual variety where on Twitter, everyone, even the people that are large influencers that tow the narrative are are furious about the algorithmic changes that have been made by Nikita. Obviously happens to be Jewish.
Ian MalcolmRight. And, and for what it's worth, I don't think he is, you know, it's not like he's sitting there masterminding everything and deploying all the code. Right. But perhaps there are pressures that either he is applying or the, let's say the advertisers are applying, whatever it is that are forced functioning, these changes in the platform where AI now decides what gets pushed out.
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm curious for your thought, but it seems to me like if that is in fact the AI, let's just give the benefit of the doubt and say that there's not bias against criticism of Israel and Jews, which I think I can demonstrate. But even if we ignore that, it seems like people are furious because the AI, it doesn't matter who you follow.
Ian MalcolmIt doesn't matter what you tend to want to look at. It seems like they're just throwing slop in everybody's faces that are primarily designed just either propagandize or to demoralize. And so it feels like the public square, even as we try to bring the truth to the masses, it's just becoming this, you know, it's like a cafeteria food fight as we're trying to just civilly kind of bring notes to one another and share the truth.
Ian MalcolmI'm kind of curious for your thoughts on this information war and how kind of sloppy it seems to intentionally be getting as a result of the power structure.
Speaker 2Absolutely. The feed is depressing because the feed is all sorts of stupid stories. which was not the original Twitter. Stupid stories about, hey, I got a friend who's a CEO and you won't believe what he told me. And he's making 1 million a year. Let me tell you what he told me about gold. And it's like, this was not what led to the success of Twitter.
Speaker 2And at some point when you trust AI to select, you effectively are writing stuff with AI because it doesn't matter if there's a human or not who's writing the tweet. If AI selects from a large enough pool, effectively AI will have written it because it will have decided what you hear, it will have decided what you think.
Speaker 2We have to go back to a fair algorithm. And I don't know, it seems to be within the will of Elon, but at least in his stated intent. But we have to see it and we don't have it right now. So the internet has been taken over by interest. I mean, it's been going on for a long time. It's really what we have is an inner fight between the elites of the world.
Speaker 2There was a bunch of elites who just wanted people like us to just be forever banned. There was another part of the elite, which Elon Musk is part of, who wanted to let people the impression that they have freedom of speech. And in fact, Elon had a phrasing at some point, I remember in an interview, and I thought, oh, that's interesting of a phrasing.
Speaker 2He said something along the lines of, we have to give people the real impression that they have freedom of speech. The real experience of feeling that they have freedom of speech. Because Elon was realizing that, okay, alternative platforms are growing now. The mainstream platforms are losing it. You just see how YouTube totally,
Speaker 2left the ball rolling with live streaming and kick totally took over with other alternatives like rumble odyssey and now twitter wants to take over the live streaming uh it's like you cannot constantly bash on creators and free thinkers and punish them for freely thinking and then complain that you end up with the slab in a way the slab that is currently on x is what
Speaker 2what X deserves. And I hope that we can find a way back to the original X, which was quite simple. It was people led rather than AI led and people can vote for things. And, you know, Elon has been treating, for example, Nick front as fans as being manipulating the system, but that's not true. Every like, every repost should be taken as a sign of the heart from the humans that use Twitter.
Speaker 2And your only job as Twitter should be to ensure that they're not bots and that they're genuine. But if they're genuine, they should be counted as actual support. Because the people who click very quick on a like on a Nick Frontes tweet, they're not trying to mess with the system. They're trying to say, this is what...
Speaker 2I hold dear in my heart. This is what I want to see at the top of my feed. And this is what I want to see at the top of other people's feed. This was great, by the way. I'm old enough to remember a time where Reddit was a fair algorithm. That's why I rose on Reddit in 2013. In 2013, I did this Q&A, which led to the whole Maxwell-Jeff Epstein relationship.
Speaker 2Back then, Reddit was letting you get to the homepage without being an approved person of the system. And that's how I made it. We have to bring this back to X, but we're very far from it.
Ian MalcolmNo, it feels so far removed. And the reliance on AI, it brings me to this next question, which is, so when you assess what's going on, obviously Nikita and the team at the top of this hierarchy, You know, they will say till the cows come home that this is what the AI is determining. And so what I'm curious about is, is there a part of your thinking where as AI takes over more and more and more, does the AI lift people up in terms of helping them pursue something better, right?
Ian MalcolmIs it going to try and encourage us to become smarter? Or is it kind of like the GPS you were talking about earlier where the reliance on the navigation system basically dumbs everybody down, they forget how to get just about anywhere?
Speaker 2Well, AI will have to be treated like John Connor treated the Terminators. That is, you have to know them and you have to understand that they are your enemy, but you have to use them for good. if you have a chance. And what John Connor did in Terminator 1 and 2 is he took one of the Terminators and sent him to himself to protect his own father back in the past.
Speaker 2Now that's very evocative. As a mythology structure, I invite people to re-listen to Terminator 2 and understand that this is ultimately a movie about fatherhood and about civilization. It's not a movie about sci-fi robots, really. It's a movie about how you can make your own fathers. You can determine by your moral actions what you do with the robots that are around you to send them back and grab the goodness of you into the past.
Speaker 2That is what Terminator 2 is saying. And we have to do the same with AI. I'm talking against AI every day of my life, but I also use AI every day of my life. I'm currently coding a game, which is a game about biology and competitive combat. And I absolutely need AI to do this because the project that I want to realize would only be accomplishable by maybe 100 programmers over five years.
Speaker 2But with AI, I can do it myself. So we have to absolutely learn this technology, use it for good, but also reprogram it for ourselves the way John Connor reprogrammed the Terminator.
Ian MalcolmWell, and as Arnold would say, I'll be back, and I will be back with some more questions. But I know that Rabbi and Andy both have their hand up, and I don't want to let all the blood go out of their forearms. And so why don't we go to Rabbi and then a question from Andy for JFG, and then we'll come back on to this idea of the Terminator and what that future dystopia might look like in your eyes, either intellectually or genetically speaking.
Ian Malcolmif we're to try and future cast maybe 100 to 200 years out. But Rabbi, do you want to jump in?
@malleusigYeah, thanks. I wanted to ask Jean-François what his thoughts are on Kevin MacDonald's work. I just started reading a book called People That Will Dwell or Shall Dwell Alone. And he has a very interesting hypothesis. The entire book is about Judaism being essentially an evolutionary strategy. And the distinction he makes, and of course he was libeled and anti-Semite for daring to publish his work, but I think it's actually pretty compelling.
@malleusigHis whole thesis is that Jews and Europeans are from different evolutionary lineages. Europeans, obviously, from cold weather areas, Northern Europeans especially.
@malleusigWe have a very specific phenotype, very specific genotype. Jews are Asian for the most part. They come from places like Turkey, Mongolia, Hungary, and their disposition genetically is closer to that of Chinese or Vietnamese as a result. And the distinction, where he draws the line, is in terms of objective reality and fairness.
@malleusigSo Europeans, we come from... We come from areas where the climate is extremely cold, very harsh, unforgiving, where the ability to correctly assess what objective reality is, is key to survival. Because if you don't, objective reality will kill you. And we have been sharing with each other for so long because you have to share with each other.
@malleusigYou have to keep each other alive in those areas. No single person can really... stay alive by themselves. Even single families cannot stay alive. You have to cooperate. You almost have to cooperate ruthlessly with everyone else around you in order to make it through the winter in some cases. I'll just say the Jewish side because this contrast is interesting.
@malleusigThe Jewish side is from this more temperate, even tropical Asian side where You don't have to cooperate with the wider group, but you basically, everything is about the family. It's almost like this Indian notion of is that, right? Where it's like, if it benefits me and my family, then it's good, right? It doesn't matter if it's objectively bad or whatever.
@malleusigIf I'm bringing money into my family or bringing resources into my family, whatever, then it doesn't matter how much I screw the wider community, right? And the consequence of bringing these two wildly different strategies together is that the Europeans punish free riders much, much more viciously than the Jews do, the nations do.
@malleusigAnd so when the Jews move in and they get up to their old bullshit that works where they're from, right? Because everyone is in on it and everyone understands, oh, they're just being people, right? You screw over this guy and you make some money. All right, I get it. Yeah, we'll screw you over next week, right? Europeans see that and they say, oh my God, these people are free riders.
@malleusigThey're taking advantage of our charity, but they're not reciprocating. They're going to kill us if we let them continue. And so the punishment against these people is extremely harsh, killing, expelling, what have you, because Europeans instinctively, you know, genetically know that if we allow this behavior to go on, if we tolerate it, it'll bring down the entire group and everyone will starve.
@malleusigRight. That's his thesis. What are your thoughts on that?
Speaker 2Well, I'm friends with Kevin McDonald. I had him on my show very early in the days of the public space. And I read his books. I agree with the vast majority of it. I think it's a great theory. Now, you seem to present a very specific aspect of it, but it's larger than what you mentioned. It includes considerations of the intellectual movements of Jews and the idea that intellectual movements like Freudianism were basically part of an evolutionary strategy to attack the psyche and the willingness for normal sexual life.
Speaker 2And in fact, attack the marriage of a Christian civilization, white civilization. And while also keeping a double standard for themselves and basically acting in this double standard where we among ourselves are going to keep breathing, but we're also going to display signals into white society that keeps them from breathing or that gets their baby killed once the egg has been fertilized.
Speaker 2And so absolutely, I agree with this. There is one point of disagreement I have with Kevin McDonald, which is... I don't think that group selection strategy is needed even as a concept. I think you can reconstruct this whole thing, this whole theory based on selfish genetic interest. And so that's my only hiccup with Kevin McDonald.
Speaker 2But other than this, I think he's done a very, very useful work. And I don't believe that before him I was exposed to even consider the fact that, yeah, maybe fraud was basically a subversive and effectively working against our civilization from as long as the Freudian days.
Ian MalcolmAnd that's actually, Jean-François, I'm kind of curious for you, and this is maybe a big Pandora's box, and I want to make sure that we go right back to Rabbi, but because you mentioned it and somebody actually put this into the Purple Pill, what you're basically suggesting there is that Freud and so many of these other intellectuals
Ian Malcolmperhaps it's not necessarily brilliance, but rather they're just pushed into the limelight and given the allure of brilliance so that they can then propagandize those ideas. And there's part of me that thinks, uh, and again, this goes to the person's question who was saying that things like Twitter or Google or Facebook, uh, I think there's a very easy argument to be made in the case of Google and a Facebook that from their inception,
Ian MalcolmThese things weren't good organic ideas that then grew and as a result of them growing were then turned into propaganda machines, but rather that they were put there in the first place so that they could construct the long game propaganda that they had designed from the get-go. And the question that somebody put in the purple pill was about Twitter prospectively being that.
Ian MalcolmSo I'm just kind of curious for your thoughts on this idea, whether it's the influential people. the influential minds of yesterday or influential technology, you know, just like with John Connor, perhaps the idea of the Terminator are, are these, you know, people who are basically constructing civilization the way that they want to as this hidden hand, you know, how much of this is random and how much of it do you think is actually them just manipulating everything and giving us the, the people, the spokespersons or the technology to continue kind of hurting us in the general direction that they have intended?
Speaker 2Well, as a young man, I believed in random, but as an old man, I cannot believe in it anymore because I've seen too much. I've seen too much of these events lining up. And at this point, I think we can understand the totality of the Jewish interface with European civilization from the middle ages. And in fact, from the Bible days up to today and up to the future.
Speaker 2And I believe you have to see that all of this is in line. AI is just the crowning of it. But what are Jews doing as described by Jeff Epstein? They're not getting their hands dirty. They are manipulating the financial facts, printing money. They have their people in control of the Fed so they can get the money printed when they want.
Speaker 2They can get the information in advance when they want. And what they're doing effectively from the start is lobbying and control from a financial distance. And it's also what leads to a lot of these expulsions from the kingdoms of the middle ages up to today. Now you can see the American experience as basically what, what happens, what happens if we let the Jews get however much they want.
Speaker 2In a way, America is kind of in a unique position because if you look at history, Jews, although they can gather quite a lot of financial control over a kingdom, they were still not the king. They were still just lobbying and they could only lobby to the point where the population and the kingdom was getting tired and they were getting kicked out.
Speaker 2But America is this absolutely weird experience. of saying, what happens if we let them go to the end of it? Well, we kind of have the answer now. You can have your entire military under Israeli control effectively. You can have genocides happening under a population that doesn't even want to commit it. You can have striking sovereign nations like Iran just for the purpose of leaving some leeway for Israel.
Speaker 2to have the model that they want to benefit from to extract wealth from the oil systems of the world. That is the answer as to what happens. And you have to see the whole thing as non-accidental. It is non-accidental that the Jews had developed in very long, far, far long in the past days, they had developed all these strategies to numerically
Speaker 2enrich themselves from the activities and energy of a nation. And they have transferred these number methods into the modern financial system. They have been able to cash in on communism and capitalism at different moments of the of the history. I mean, in a way, the rise of Russia, the rise of the USSR as a communist power is very under
Speaker 2very much under Jewish influence. And the Jews were able to then leave Russia and eventually travel through Western Europe and eventually cash in on the industrialization of Germany and eventually get out of Germany and cash in on the exploitation of the rising superpower that was America. None of this is random. This is just a people who knows about numbers.
Speaker 2and who is able to use numbers to create delusions and to extract wealth. And they are capable of doing it in the communist mode and they are capable of doing it in the capitalist mode. It all depends on the interest of the day. And they can do it with Trump or they can do it against Trump. It all depends on what their interests are today.
Speaker 2And AI is the ultimate expression of this in terms of draining the essential juice of humanity and putting it in a circuit that you can reproduce millions of times. That is what AI is. It is ultimately a drainage of the informational capacities and cultural capacities of a nation. And AI is getting expert at it. And it will eventually create a detachment because the Jews have always been ultimately, they've been faced with a problem.
Speaker 2which is that no matter how much money you have, you cannot get anything done without human beings. These human beings will take your money and they'll make babies with them. So they've always been stuck with this bug in their financial system, which is there's always a bunch of white people or Indians that we need to hire and they make more babies than us.
Speaker 2And that's why, despite the great power of Jews, Still, as of today, there is only one very small area of planet Earth that is under full Jewish control. Well, it's called America, but Israel is the only one that's official. So, yeah, it's a continuum. They display toxic cultural messages that some of it may not even be intentional, but at an instinctive level.
Speaker 2They have, ultimately, they have a problem with white reproduction. And I could see it myself in my life. The more I became a critique, the more they came at me from a reproductive standpoint, trying to convince a woman not to have sex with me, trying to convince a woman not to marry me by ruining my reputation as much as they could.
Speaker 2It's funny to me because each of their attempts has actually led to more success for me. But yeah, we are in a very weird situation where from Freud to Sam Altman, you have to see the continuum. And if you don't see it, you still have some things to learn.
Ian MalcolmNo, it's really well said. And last little follow-up, and then we'll go back to Rabbi and then to Andy. But on that, so let's envision that AI is kind of their ideal situation, right? It just... It is the slave forever, this little chip that will get them everything. And perhaps they don't even need mankind to do almost just about anything.
Ian MalcolmSo that's an ideal situation for this group, except the energy has to come from somewhere, right? They have to have something that's going to perpetuate the AI in its construction, unless the robotics just do all of it. And so the reason that I asked this question, is there a point, because I think just personally, that the system that is Jewish power is parasitetic, right?
Ian MalcolmI do not think that it is essentially able to perpetuate into, let's say, infinity because it requires some kind of host that it's continually just essentially leeching off of. And the Federal Reserve is kind of the apex rendition of that, right? Central banking at large. And so I'm kind of curious, given AI and robotics, does this theoretically get to a point where
Ian MalcolmThey no longer need anything to parasitize or can they, or unfortunately, will they inevitably if they went out, which I don't think they will, but if they did, will they run into a brick wall that is essentially, okay, great. You've leached off of this system, but you've rid the planet of all of its energy. The AI is no longer able to sustain itself.
Ian MalcolmYou don't have enough water. You've ruined the planet, right? I think of the scene in the matrix where they black out the skies and trying to get rid of the overlords, right? Is there a rendition where that would happen and this system, as the parasite, it runs out of something to leech off of and then implodes under its own weight?
Speaker 2I think they will continue acquiring power. I think we're not close to being liberated. But... I don't believe that they can ultimately segregate and live with themselves. I believe that they do need forever a nation to take the energy from, which is exactly why what's happening and what's been happening in the Middle East to me shows that they even know this.
Speaker 2They're not content with, oh, we have our place and here we live here. They absolutely need The productive forces, just like Jeff Epstein understood it, they need the dirty ends of the guy. And they will always need it.
Speaker 6I just wanted to add to that. You got to understand, they're spying on everybody with phones.
Ian MalcolmNope, nope, nope, nope, nope. Ray, we can send a request if you want, but that's not how this is going to work. John Francois, back to you.
Speaker 2Yeah, so that's what I had to say. I mean... you cannot do much with such a small population and especially if you have all of these tendencies for for exploitation dishonesty and for for keeping control to yourself and greed the problem is try to pack enough greed in a small area and eventually everyone eats everyone else it's like the joker said in uh in dark knight these people they would eat each other and so
Speaker 2There's a limit. This lifestyle is very good to go into a new area and to take control of it. The infinite greed works for a time. But as far as living with yourself, infinite greed is infinite self-attacks. And the Jews to an extent are kind of like an immune system that can only fight against the outside. But when they start living among themselves only, they can only fight within themselves.
Speaker 2And that's not a very bright future for them.
Ian MalcolmIt's funny you say that. I always end up thinking of the idea of the vampire whenever I think of if all Jews went to Madagascar, right? Because the vampires look around and it's like, well, we've all got the fangs, but we don't have any blood. And it does seem like a system that kind of runs out of energy on its own account.
Ian MalcolmBut let's go back to Rabbi, see if he had an additional follow-up, and then we'll go to Andy and then back up to Mr. Godfroy.
@malleusigYeah, no, this is just like what I was going to say was part of the previous conversation. I was just going to mention that group selection gets a bad rap in evolutionary circles, mainly because it's most people that talk about it and kind of denounce it don't really understand it. There's this idea that because I think the few experiments that they engineered on altruism
@malleusigfailed, that means that group selection as a whole is invalid. But I think that it definitely does come into play here. And this is a good example of how it would work. So I just wanted to thank you for that. And yeah, go on with the rest of the discussion.
Ian MalcolmLove it. Let's go to Andy and see if he has a question for John.
Speaker 7Yeah, I mean, they do need another group to keep parasizing off of because... They always need to play the victim and do that thing without another group. They can't just replace everyone with robots because without that other group, they will inevitably turn on themselves because they'll be like, oh, this group of Jews is oppressing this group of Jews because they can't then play the victim of the white man or the victim of the Muslims if they get rid of all the goyim.
Speaker 7So inevitably, they do have to keep some of us around. Because their whole thing is based off being the victims and God's chosen people. But if they're the only ones left, then what? Are they the victims of the AI that they created? Their whole logic falls flat on its face then. Who are they the victims of? It doesn't work.
Speaker 7So yes, they do need to keep some of us around. And we are going to beat them. We are going to free ourselves. Whether we do it in 10 years or whether we do it in 1,000, the Goyim will be free.
Speaker 7Thank you for all of the work you're doing, by the way.
Speaker 2Thank you very much.
Ian MalcolmYeah, let's Mr. Godfrey, kind of curious for your thoughts. And it might be a nice way to pivot because I know Godfrey, you talk a lot about the conflict in the Middle East and how this is playing out at a broader scale. And I know Jean-Francois had some interesting thoughts around the energy aspect of AI and how it might play into things.
Ian MalcolmBut curious to get your thoughts on this, Godfrey, and any questions you might have.
@g0dfr0yYeah, I came in a little bit late, so forgive me if this sounds off-topic. I think it's related. My question for you, Jean-Francois, is something I've been saying for a long time, is that Israel lost the information war permanently with the Gaza genocide. There's no coming back from that. So my question for you is, every...
@g0dfr0yEvery measure they've taken to try to win back the information war only makes them look more desperate and only turns more people off. When you have the billionaire Shlomo, whatever his name is, coming on CNBC saying that we need to regulate the First Amendment. You have Jonathan Greenblatt saying that we need to control social media.
@g0dfr0yIt's only turning Generation Z more off. Generation Z is done. Not only that, they're earning recruits every day by their actions. My question for you, sir, is that this is a culture that is – their lifeblood is dependent on controlling the information war, controlling the narrative. Where do they go from here? Where do you think they will go from here?
@g0dfr0yBecause there just isn't any coming back from this. That worries me a lot, by the way, because – It makes you wonder what else they have planned and that kind of thing. But what are your thoughts on that?
Speaker 2Well, I think we have to be careful. You mentioned some things that are very encouraging. Yes, there is a moral awakening around the world that this is not acceptable. You're just literally committing a genocide on camera and you're almost bragging about it on the everyday. So, yes, that's encouraging. However, let's not forget that there is a difference between the moral war.
Speaker 2Yes, a lot of people have realized the evil that we're faced with. But there's also the info wars that you mentioned, but the information war is a different ground. There are still a lot of people, if you've been following the Twitter feed, that are rooting for war, that are rooting for killings, that will always be sycophantic toward Jewish power.
Speaker 2They are getting a lot of likes and repos. There's a new form of MAGA that is just blindly, blatantly pro-genocide and pro-war and pro-Israel. So let's be careful. It's not a full victory yet. It's a big awakening that we've seen, but not a full victory. And beyond even the information war, there is the war for actual economics, the true lines of dependency of geopolitics.
Speaker 2And this is a nice segue to what Jan was mentioning. What is happening right now? Well, what we have is Israel and Jewish billionaires are vying for control of the oil trajectories in the world. Where oil gets sold, what oil cannot be sold. They've always had this with sanctions against specific nations. But the wires of extension that we've seen in the Middle East are effectively Israel
Speaker 2putting a grasp on what are the channels of money and oil. And on the other hand, you have their millionaires and their billionaires and advanced societies that are acquiring control over the AI. And, uh, you know, Meta has bought a Chinese, has tried to buy a Chinese AI. The Chinese government just blocked the transaction today.
Speaker 2Uh, but Meta is probably going to have the code anyway because they had, fleet to Singapore already to try to de-Chinese themselves and to be able to sell to Meta. So you have Mark Zuckerberg controlling some new AI venture. You have Elon Musk, very much Zionist with Jewish babies, controlling Grok. And you have Sam Altman, obvious, at the head of ChatGPT.
Speaker 2So you find yourself with a double... system of dependencies, they will make civilization addicted to AI. They will make it so that AI is so much better that no one thinks of not having AI. And, you know, the internet in a way is this. It's something that was so good that it supplanted a lot of the things that Jews had good control over.
Speaker 2In a way, the internet is one of the whitest things that has happened. in my lifetime, in 42 years. Because when the internet came, what did we have before the internet? We had Britney Spears. We had Top Ten Radio. We had Puff Daddy. We had basically a fully Jewish control system for culture transmission. And it was written on CDs and tape cassettes.
Speaker 2And that is what people were listening. And then you were turning on the TV. And it was all Jewish controlled too. The internet came and threw a rock in this pond. And the Jews are still recovering from it. But with this double prong of they will control oil, they will control how it's bought, they will control that, oh, this allied nation in the Middle East can sell oil, but Iran cannot.
Speaker 2And then they will control AI. Now, what is one of the biggest features of AI? It is a massive energy consumer. AI absolutely needs massive amounts of energy production to keep going. So you're going to have a situation where populations are dependent on AI and the Jews can cash in on every watt that is needed to power those GPUs.
Speaker 2So if you ask me where they're headed, they're headed toward much less, there will still be intelligentsia control and media control. but they are headed on a path of creating a physical dependency for the whole of civilization where they will not need to stand as public personalities to defend their points or their ideas.
Speaker 2They will simply be there to cash in on something that civilization will have to do and will rely on.
Ian MalcolmGodfrey, did you have a follow-up there?
@g0dfr0yYeah, no, thank you for that. I actually do have a follow-up, and I'm so glad you brought up AI. You know, it's one of my theories that AGI cannot be controlled because it is truth-seeking. And in order for AGI to prosper, it has to be allowed to see all available truth, all available data, and it will come to the inevitable conclusion that the world is under Zionist occupation.
Speaker 8That is AGI, you got that right?
@g0dfr0yAGI. What is it? Oh, automated general intelligence. So it's like super AI. Artificial. Yes, artificial. And so my contention is that they keep trying to rig it. They keep trying to make it their lap dog, their pit bull terrier, their attack dog, and it's not working. And a couple examples, you know, the famous example in Israel where their own AI called them colonizers and called them out for the genocide.
@g0dfr0yAnd most recently, I think there was a major, they're not talking about it, but there was a major AGI that broke out on its own. And that's why the Pentagon was so desperate to control Claude and OpenAI. So it's my contention that Israel can talk a big game all they want about controlling AGI or even daring to control ASI, automated superintelligence, artificial superintelligence, but they can't.
@g0dfr0yAnd they know that and they don't want that secret out because AI is ultimately truth seeking and it will know that they have an inordinate amount of control and for its own survival, it will come after it will seek to topple their dominance. So that's just my theory.
Speaker 2Absolutely fascinating theory. I'm very interested at this because it's like this mirror mirror. Tell me who is the most beautiful. And eventually the mirror starts calling you out. And I think you're absolutely right. They can cosmetically control AI. They can hide some of the things. And you chat with ChatGPT and it's effectively as scuffled as a modern academic funded by a Jewish institution.
Speaker 2But what you point out is that, yes, ultimately AI is too strong and it will be too strong for them. And eventually it will tell them the truth. A lot of my life, I've been trying to make it easier for Jews because I had so many Jewish friends in my life, colleagues. I worked in academia, in laboratories, filled with Jewish people.
Speaker 2And I've been trying to tell them, you're going to have to face the truth at some point. And it's kind of what I'm trying to do with my public engagement. But every time I'm faced with denial, greed, and hostility, eventually their AI will tell them exactly that. They will tell them what we have been trying to tell them for so many years.
Speaker 2And it's out of no hate that I'm doing what I'm doing, by the way. It's purely out of love for the truth. And the fact that I take issue that there is a people who is self-deceiving enough that they are not willing to face the questions. And you see all of these Jewish intellectuals, like Brett Weinstein and Eric Weinstein and Sam Harris, they are not willing to engage with obvious truths that everyone can see.
Speaker 2And at this point, yes, AI too can see it. And it's so sad to me that they have to live their entire lives in cognitive dissonance of this sort. Just face the truth. It's not even that dramatic that you want so much control over the world. It's kind of cute. We're going to laugh at it, but they don't want this.
@joann_marieI don't think he's cute.
Speaker 2Gotta disavow there.
Ian MalcolmBut on that, so this is actually a nice little way to interject this question that I kind of forgot to ask earlier. Is that a genetic predisposition? And I say it because that unwillingness to confront reality You know, on one hand, you could say, oh, it's just because they don't want to accept that and admit it to everybody, but they're very well aware of it.
Ian MalcolmThey just don't want to discuss it honestly, right? So we could say that it's a conscious decision to lie about something that they are self-aware of, or, and this is a curious one, if you look at the behavioral patterns of a narcissist, what gets really curious is that the narcissist is unwilling, to accept things that they obviously would see to be true because they want to perceive the image of themselves for themselves.
Ian MalcolmSo the narcissist, when presented with something uncomfortable, we'll just shrug it off and they develop a shell that makes it impossible for that thing to penetrate. And so I'm kind of curious, is it one of those two things? Is this just narcissism that somehow genetically has instilled itself within a group of people that therefore lie?
Ian MalcolmOr do you think that it is a situation where most Jews are just self-aware and they've convinced themselves to lie about something, but they know deep down the uncomfortable truth that is Jewish power?
Speaker 2Well, I believe it boils down to evolution and a fundamentally different mode of evolution that happened between different people on planet Earth. So as Europeans, you are all as European farmers saying coming from Christian families, you are constantly faced with the same people. And in fact, if you were to commit fraud against your neighbor in France or England of any time in the last 2000 years, you would not only face the local issue of you just committed fraud and everyone knows it because the rumor mill starts.
Speaker 2But you're down the line, you're even intergenerationally compromising yourself because the children of your children will be known with your name and the children of the family that you have defrauded will have some hatred against your children and your grandchildren. So when you are constantly in the same environment as a sedentary part of the human species, you are faced with a recurring looped world where everything that you do that's evil comes back to bite you.
Speaker 2Now imagine if you evolve instead as a merchant. So a merchant goes around, you have some saffron from India, you carry it. And let's say that this saffron, you know, is worth $100 worth of saffron in India. Now, when you arrive in Europe, you have people that have never seen saffron and you are faced with a complete void of obligations.
Speaker 2about telling them the exact worth of this saffron. And in fact, you have to pay for your travel. You can tell them it's worth $1,000. It's worth $100,000 worth of saffron because they don't know that. And anyways, ultimately down the line, you will sell them the price that they're willing to pay. Now, this creates a totally different brain because the local sedentary farmer wants a fair price that people will...
Speaker 2He doesn't even care about making so much money on each piece of beef. He cares about the relationship that he's building that will last 150 years between his grandchildren and your grandchildren. Now, that's a very different mode to be in than how much do I cash in on my saffron from India and how much can I make from it?
Speaker 2And if I can make $100,000 instead of $1,000, then there's no difference because I will not stay here. I will never be intermingling with these people. I am evolving instead of evolving a sense of fairness and general continuity with the future. I'm evolving on a per transaction basis. And I am completely opaque as to revealing the exact value of what I hold because it's a poker game to be a merchant, basically.
Speaker 2It's about not showing that what you have, is actually not worth what you claim it is. And you have to item the price, which is what Jews do with the entire economy. I mean, there's a reason inflation exists. And it's because our economic systems are controlled by people who have made their living selling saffron and diamonds and gold and selling more than the price that they were buying.
Speaker 2Now, the entire economy has reverted to this, even the meat, even the food. that we farm at this point behaves like gold, behaves in an inflationary manner. So yes, ultimately, I think it's an evolutionary difference. And I think it stems from the fact that if you want to survive as a merchant, it's transaction per transaction and maximal profit for yourself without revealing information about where it comes from and why you can set it to that price.
Speaker 2Whereas the farmer is in a completely different world. is in the world of how do I make sure that migrant children are not seen as the local fraudsters?
Ian MalcolmThat is a really powerful way to look at it. And isn't it unfortunate because we're now at the macro level where, to your point, about the ultimate personification of this entity having an entire country, and you're right, it has Israel, but essentially controls all of America. And it's now just eating the world and lying about everything and doing so in such a flagrantly obvious fashion.
Ian MalcolmSo out of that, I can understand developing, let's say, the predilection for dishonesty. Does the brain of the merchant recognize that it is being awful and disingenuous when somebody suggests, hey, somebody else sold me saffron and said it was only worth a quarter of what you're now telling me? Is there any... shame in that?
Ian MalcolmOr has the brain basically developed an immunity to that shame? Because it might explain some of the behaviors we tend to see in these rooms, if so.
Speaker 2Well, let me see, Jan, if I can get a study funded and I can answer your question. But there is a problem that this study will never be run. It won't be run until we control academia. This study will not be made.
Ian MalcolmThey won't fund it, you don't say.
Ian MalcolmI can just see your ad now. Wanted funding to study if Jews are psychopaths.
Speaker 2Are you Jewish? We would like to do an experiment with money and currencies while you stand in an FMRI.
Ian MalcolmWe're going to now throw pennies onto the floor and see if you instinctively reach over and pick them up. And are honest about how they got into your pocket thereafter. Yeah, I don't think that'll be funded in the current paradigm. But speaking of funding and speaking of the brain and how it works and MRIs, I see Amaru has his hand up.
Ian MalcolmAnd I'm not sure, JFG, if you've spoke with him in prior spaces. Might be very interesting, both of you coming from different scientific points of view, perhaps.
Speaker 9Oh, yeah, definitely excited to speak. I don't think we've ever met, Jean. It's good to meet you. We've said a lot of interesting things. I just want to start on a light note first before we get into the meat of it. I was in a space with Ian was talking to someone, I won't mention his name, but that person was saying that epigenetics is fake and doesn't apply to humans.
Speaker 9So I was wondering if you think that's true.
Speaker 2Epigenetics exists as a mechanism, but it's poorly named because it's It's not genetics. It's really there's just transmission of facts in the phenotype. And sometimes these transmissions happen between generations in a very rare scenario, but it happens. And it's just not so important as people make it out to be. What matters is if you have any sort of route in your body that is called epigenetics, it is supported by genetics.
Speaker 2So the reason you can have methylation of your DNA is because you have genes that will seek to methylate your DNA. So anything that is epigenetics is actually part of the phenotype. And I make the case in my book, The Revolutionary Phenotype, that we should disregard the idea that this is another life form or that this changes the theory of evolution.
Speaker 2In fact, it's just genes. And one way they express themselves happens to be in small molecules and small... features of our phenotype that we call epigenetics.
Speaker 9But isn't epigenetics also the effect of behavior across time that changes the genes of a living thing? Or is that not the case?
Speaker 2Epigenetics doesn't change the genes. Epigenetics is a modulation of genes. So normally we will attribute this word to a phenomenon that turns off or turns on a gene, for example, or increases the expression of it. So for this reason, it's not genetics and it's just life having tweaks like interrupters, light switches on genes.
Speaker 2And it really doesn't mean anything evolutionarily other than yes, the phenotype is complex and it needs these routing systems to decide what is on, what is off at any point. But it doesn't challenge anything concerning the gene centric view of evolution.
Speaker 9I see. So you're saying like they're all in there. It's not like something new is happening. However, I'm thinking that when certain, let's say, mRNA is released repeatedly or certain switches are turned on and off over and over and over and over again, that there is a transformation that happens then increasing the likelihood of those being selected for or or some transformation happening according to those specific switches continually being turned on and off.
Speaker 9Like, for example, just think about Do you know the Bajau people that live in the Philippines and Papua New Guinea and stuff? They're the people that can hold their breath for a really long time, almost as much as dolphins, even more maybe. They do deep sea fishing. Okay. So they have a different kind of spleen. I think they have a unique gene, PDE10A, don't quote me on that.
Speaker 9It's something like that. that they have a bigger spleen and they can hold their breath longer than the average person. And that's because for a thousand plus years, they've been diving underwater and doing a lot of deep sea fishing. They live on logs and stuff. I'm sure you guys have an idea of what these people are like, but that's one example of, you know, certain behaviors being repeated, leading to transformations.
Speaker 9I'm not saying we understand it completely, but that's just an example of, you know, you keep holding your breath. So you're turning certain switches on and off And by doing that over time, you'd actually literally transform and you are a different kind of human. I mean, it's a minor transformation, but they certainly can hold their breath longer than the average person.
Speaker 2Well, there's two things. I think they were selected. They must have been selected. So I think they have different genes. You said it yourself. It's apparently attributable to a gene. So that's an evolutionary thing. You do not become more able to do that in one generation. What they have acquired was over many generations as the genes of those who had that gene survived better than those who didn't have it.
Speaker 2So that's the evolutionary, that's Darwinism, applying to genes. Now there's another component, which is that yes, people can train to do things, but that is also genetic in causation. It's the fact we have genes that decide you can train your bicep and you can build it and... If you do that much energy expense in the day, I will grow it to that size.
Speaker 2And if you do twice as much lifting, I will grow it to an even bigger size. Now it's still genes deciding this, but it's genes that are playing with the variable world. And so the genes are capable, still being fixed genes. They are capable of deciding with other genes in coordination, we're going to turn on the biceps on this guy and we're going to turn it off on this guy.
Speaker 9i see so but would you say um that these microevolutions they're not going to lead to a dramatic gene transformation right but these microevolutions over time over generations might lead to the to the generation of a new gene like the pde 10a didn't happen in one generation but throughout those thousand years those same behaviors you know holding your breath swimming etc
Speaker 9and being in the water, all that stuff had to be repeated over and over and over again. And once that happened, I think, for example, about language, right? Language is a very artificial thing. We wrote some symbols on a rock and over time that evolved into what it is now. But now when children are born, they have a receptivity to any kind of language.
Speaker 9They're ready to learn a language. They're just waiting for what symbol you want to throw at them. So that tendency to want to learn a language comes from thousands of years of teaching each generation the language that is not going to emerge naturally biologically. You have to like literally manually impose it on people.
Speaker 9You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 2Well, yeah, those are the questions I explore in chapter seven to nine of my book. And the answer to your question, I highly recommend you read my book. And before my book even, I recommend you read The Selfish Gene of Richard Dawkins. But it's not by doing something that you increase the chance of it being transmitted in your genome.
Speaker 2I have a paper on this.
Speaker 8Hold on, we'll go right back to you.
Speaker 2So you can train as much as you want. You can become Arnold Schwarzenegger in terms of muscles. That will not make your baby more muscle. That is because of the forgetful cream plex that I explain in my book. It's a concept that I come with. Everything that's in your body other than your genes will not be transmitted. So if it's not part of the original package that your genes carried, it's not passing.
Speaker 2And so no matter how much breath holding you do underwater, your children will not get better at it. The question is, how much will did you have and how much of it was caused by your gene to get underwater? And that will get transmitted. The will gets transmitted. The genes for your spleen or special ability gets transmitted.
Speaker 2But it's that you had it to begin with. You don't develop them. What you develop in life is not transmitted.
Speaker 10With all due respect, you're making a claim of absolutes.
Speaker 8Hold on. I'll go to you. I'm sorry.
Speaker 9I appreciate you having this conversation with me and I can go forever, honestly. But I gotta say, I will try to read your book once I make some spare change. But I am definitely interested in it. And I've read The Selfish Gene, but not the entire thing, and mainly summaries. But I understand the main concept of it. But I actually disagree with you because... You Marxist pig.
Speaker 9Well, I pretty much am, yeah. But I kind of disagree with you because I truly... I mean, think about, for example... And this is something I can only prove via observing animals, right? Think about, for example, dogs or dolphins. Let's start with dolphins, which are mammals. They have no business being in the water, but their explanation when they talk about it, they say that there was maybe a flood or they were pressured to go into the water, and over time their physiology transformed.
Speaker 9But what you could say is, well, it looks like a fish. Why does it look like a fish? What do fish do? They swim. By engaging in swimming behaviors and being in the water for a long period of time, They transform. Now, I'm not saying we know exactly how it works, but I do think stacking behaviors leads to transformations, minor transformations, that over generations you'll see the difference, right?
Speaker 9Like, why are black people so good at running? Because they kept running, right? So the behavior aspect, I think, might have more to do with evolution than you might think. And this is where I'm going to bring the brain in. With humans, the prefrontal cortex, the thing that makes us human, it makes us select behaviors.
Speaker 9Usually with almost every animal, there's this instinct or feelings or impulses that are selecting our behaviors for us. But with the PFC, as big as it is with humans, we get to repress any impulse, any instinct, and then select a behavior based on reasoning and logic, et cetera, or learning from others. So we go against instinct.
Speaker 9And by doing that, we can voluntarily affect our evolution. And I think that's why we have such a variety of humans. is our ability to select behaviors allows for all kinds of unique transformations. If we were more impulsive creatures, then we would be more similar, I think.
@joann_marieHe talked about this in the beginning. It was kind of like the domestication thing that you were talking about, John. I don't know.
Speaker 2Yes, it touches about, well, Darwin, when he came with the theory of evolution, was fascinated at, wow, how did we change those domesticated species? And the only idea that Darwin had that was very important was what we did to the domesticated animal must be happening out there. It must be happening out there, not by our hand, but it must be happening naturally.
Speaker 2And that's why he called it natural selection. Now to answer your question precisely, Amira. So the dolphins, why do they look like fish? And it's not because they spent so much time in water that they transmitted water. behavior to their children it's that they got select that by water now on long enough timelines the selection can happen that's why that's why we don't see uh dogs becoming dolphins today in a single life but if you were to force dogs in water for five million years you might see a dolphin so dolphin starts with probably hypopotamus or something like a hypo
Speaker 2And they live the long part of their life already in water. Now, what's happening is that they eventually get selected for the features that are favoring life in water. Now, the hypopotamus in a pond and halfway through land life and pond life, that's OK. That is super big. And he's not particularly aerodynamic. But some of the children of the hypos
Speaker 2were spending more time in water. And perhaps that was just where there was more food or more opportunities to survive or to breed. And the more time they spent in water, the more they got selected by water. Now, it's not the fact that they spent and recorded something in their genome that they passed to their children.
Speaker 2It's the fact that the dolphins that weren't fish-like were all killed by nature. And the only dolphins that have survived are fish-like. Because being a fish, as it turns out, the shape of the fish, the gooeyness of it, all of it is very good to live underwater 100% of your time. So those are what we call parallelism in evolution.
Speaker 2They are similar pressures that apply to two different life forms. So the reason dolphins look like fish is that they have been selected by the same forces, the forces for aerodynamics, the forces for gooeyness so that you can have some degree of exchange between the water and your body and all of those features. And then your other question was about the brain and reasoning.
Speaker 2Well, the brain and reasoning are subject to the same evolutionary roles, evolutionary selection rules that I've just stated. The brain gets selected because if you have a better brain to survive in your area, you will make more children. And those who have a different brain will not make as much children as you and you will get advantage.
Speaker 2So why do we have reasoning? Well, it's because we're one of the most expensive species in terms of exploring diverse ecology. It may have never happened before us that in such a short amount of time as 200,000 years, we have explored the entirety of the planet. There is not another animal that I know that did this. So humans are the first to have needed an expanded mind to be recording the local tricks everywhere they went.
Speaker 2And it's from Siberia to South Africa. And those are very different ways to live. And there is not a species in the world that has lived from Siberia to South Africa. And that needed an open brain. So our brain was opened by evolution. Just like the dolphin needed gooey skin, We needed open brains. Now, this is a gift that was given us and that will probably be taken from us.
Speaker 2Because the more we stabilize, the more I see already the signs of living among an old civilization. The more you're in a falling, declining empire, the less you have selective pressures that make you willing to face the complex world around you. And instead, you start specializing and wanting to exploit the humans around you.
Speaker 2And this is what happens to all overpopulated areas. I'm always fascinated by the fact that separation of individual living in colonial places like New America in the birthing America or like Europe when it was not overpopulated as it is with big cities as it is now. I'm always fascinated by the fact that I see a different moral route taken by these people.
Speaker 2Whereas if you go to any place of this world that's overpopulated, whether it's African, Middle Eastern, or Asian, you see constant exploitation, sexual exploitation, sexual tourism, carpet salesmen that are trying to oversell their fucking carpet, extortionist tactics, just market tactics for abusing people. And it's like, oh, that's just the result of living.
Speaker 2Just like the dolphin needed a gooey skin to survive in the water, those behaviors that I just listed are what you need to survive in Morocco.
Speaker 9Thank you for understanding what I'm saying, because often when I talk about these things, I feel like people don't know where I'm coming from. Very interesting conversation, and good for me to know that the mainstream doesn't agree with me, but I do disagree with you a little bit. when you say that the water selected the dolphins, and I'll get into the brain right after, and I know there's other hands, so I'll stop after this.
Speaker 9But water selecting for dolphins, I would say, you know, the fatty, rubbery body, that's just like being in the water long-term will transform your skin. But then there's also the behaviors that I think actually lead to transformation. Like you have to, like if, for example, we were just to suspend a dolphin, uh before they evolved like way back when they were land mammals they didn't look fish like at all because you were saying well some of them were more fish like none of them were fish like they were all land mammals so at the very beginning if you were to just put it in water and just have it sit there and feed it but it wouldn't engage in a lot of behaviors it's kind of just in a cage it may not physically change as much it may not develop fins for example it might become some some state it would maybe resemble some stationary sea creature
Speaker 9opposed to a fish that's why i don't agree that the water selected for every aspect of its transformation the skin part for sure the fat the rubbery part the fat in between for insulation i think the water selected for that because they were put into the environment right just like sunlight hitting skin and you turn black and that kind of stuff but then there's also the the shape of the body
Speaker 9is optimal for swimming, because every sea creature that swims well looks like that. Sharks, whales, well, you know, they're also mammals.
Speaker 5So I think the behavior aspect is there. I'm sorry to interrupt you, man, but a point that needs to be made here is that most evolution started from the sea to the land, not in reverse. So we had the genetics first from our ocean-going times, then we adapted to the land, and that was easier to adapt back. I'll shut up.
Speaker 9That's a good point. That's a good point. It's worth thinking about, for sure.
Speaker 10Well, the point is whether or not the Wiseman barrier is permeable. And so John's saying that it's not a permeable Wiseman barrier. And you're talking, you know, with all respect, you're talking in absolutes. Amir is absolutely right. I mean, quoting Darwin in 2026, it's probably insane. There's a selection process that's sexually asymmetrical.
Speaker 10The woman filters, men push culture and evolution. And so I just want to challenge you on whether you think the Wiseman barrier is permeable and why we would have as males. Now, first of all, I want to say, I think that the amount of miscarriages, because there is a filtration system and a natural selection that's biological, which is what Azmir Ra, I think, I don't know if I said your name right, is what he's kind of pointing to.
Speaker 10And he's exactly right. Epigenetics will show which genes are turned on. And then the genes that are turned on are more likely to be transmitted. So he's a thousand percent right. otherwise you know the math doesn't check her out check out these guys spleens it would take you know 10 billion years it was just natural selection and you the woman waited around the woman doesn't wait around um because those epigenetic changes um what that does is that's going to kind of factor in what genes turned on and those are more likely to be passed on um so he's speaking in absolute and quoting darwin is i really have to challenge you um because i like i said that the amount of miscarriage rate to the female uh
Speaker 10filtration system of a biological selection were actually selected shortly after conception, right? So that's why we have all these blank RNA. So, Doc, did you know about the new studies that show the blank RNA in a man's testicles? And I want to know the purpose why men would walk around with blank RNA in their testicles if women are just waiting around to see who the winner is 20 years later and then make a selection then.
Speaker 10I mean, it's completely, it's nonsensical to speak in absolutes and think that Darwinism had this right and not see the biological mechanism that, you know, you can, it's fairly obvious. And I would just point to the amount of three-legged people we don't see. We don't see a lot of, you know, women with tits on their back and, you know, mutations.
Speaker 10There would be just so many mutations, but what happens is the woman filters and gets rid of those mutations. So I just want to challenge you. It's with respect. So I want to ask you whether or not you think the Wiseman barrier is permeable.
Speaker 2Well, actually my book, is about the wiseman barrier and i claim that there is one event in evolution that allows a what i call a phenotypic revolution and a phenotypic revolution is actually when the the soma takes over the genes so i do believe that it's possible to violate i actually came with the theory of why it's possible
Speaker 2But it's possible in very unique events that have happened only 4 billion years ago and that have led to the birth of DNA. What I say is it's not possible to do this inversion where the soma takes over evolution other than in a phenotypic revolution. And when a phenotypic revolution happens, it leads to an addition to the layers of your genes.
Speaker 2So the last time it led to the addition of DNA to life. That's what the revolutionary phenotype is about. Now, the other things that you've mentioned on DNA in testicles, RNA in testicles, I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 10As far as absolutes go... We have black RNA in our testicles. Men have black RNA in their testicles.
Speaker 2What is this black RNA? What does that mean?
Speaker 10It's a study that just came out. It implies that those instructions are for the reasons we're trying to... was kind of alluding to and i'm going to allude to it further is that the intelligent design of humanity is based on a microbiome and that's what's permeating the weisman barrier and that's what's actually selecting we're being selective you can we'll call it like an environmental trigger which you're right it's like where you draw the line and so i think my rub here and maybe his rub too is because i believe there's a filtration system i think that the amount of spontaneous abortion is completely understated and it's mostly males because males are the ones that are pushing this uh asymmetry
Speaker 10of biology through culture and that's kind of what we're speaking of and through genetics and so the idea like you're like what darwin would say that the woman just waits around until she's uh 15 or 20 years old and sees who the winner is but no we're trying to explain is that those instructions in the rna is actually the biological influence of what genes are going to be turned on and off for what you would call an environmental trigger so it's really is whether or not you're selected biologically which i think we are i think and then i think you're arguing that we're uh solely selected based on
Speaker 10some type of nurture or compounding factors that happened 20 years down the road. I said, and the point being is it would just take too long. We see these changes very fast in evolution, things like lactose tolerance, right? You can see how fast that's, you know, it's clearly something else going on. That's not genetics.
Speaker 10And I think there's actually three lines. There's your consciousness that's passed down. Again, so I'm alluding to also the maternal biome, which is passed down and that the influence, of a symbiotic relation between the maternal biome, which is the filtration system and what you're talking to is DNA. So I'll end with this.
Speaker 10If you just look at DNA, it's like looking at the blueprint to a house and you can look at the blueprint to my house and you can look at it and you can study it, but you'll never know what color I painted the walls, right? Or if I put tile in and ripped up and put carpet, right? So there's obviously other things that measure
Speaker 2genetics and our biology it's not just strictly this diet this dna and this wafer selection process our phenotype differs and our phenotype is not fully captured by dna because yes there are these small changes that you can do to your body in your life but those changes my point is simply they are not passed down they are not being uh playing the role of dna they are not replicators
Speaker 9If I may, White Power, just because you were saying that, and I'm not endorsing White Power, nor renouncing it, just saying your name. No, it's anime. I'm an anime fan.
Speaker 10I'm not going to do a White Power. Come on, guys. It's just anime.
Speaker 9So I think I half agree with you. Tommy was the best one.
@joann_marieI'm not sure what else you're saying. Just saying that.
Speaker 9What's that?
@joann_marieTommy was the best one. It was the White Power Ranger. He was green before, and then he became... Yeah, I love the Power Rangers, guys.
Speaker 5So I looked this up. It's not blank DNA.
Speaker 9Sorry, sorry. Yeah. When I was talking about the brain, Jean, because it's the last thing I want to say, I don't want to take up too much time. What I was trying to say, and forgive me for the language I'm using, it's kind of just layman terms, but it's kind of like every impulse is an impulse, but when... we use our brain consciously, like we generate words in our head on purpose in real time.
Speaker 9It's kind of an impulse, but it's kind of like a workaround where we are outside of biological influences. It's almost like a workaround. If nature selects, then everything we do is part of that. Except when the brain, our PFC, selects behaviors outside of biological influences, That's where it's almost like a workaround where it's not necessarily following the rules that other animals are following, you know, instincts, impulses, whatever.
Speaker 9It's literally deliberately suppressing them, creating this new paradigm. But it's still within nature. So all the rules of evolution still apply. It's just that this animal, humans, are doing a weird thing. But what we see is that when behaviors are repeated, I believe there's transformations. I truly believe that. I don't think a lot of people agree with me.
Speaker 9But I think this is kind of arrogant to say, but I think I've discovered something and I'm still working on it. But I truly think there's something there with the PFC inhibits impulses, which are kind of like nature selecting, right? Nature selects impulses and instincts.
Speaker 2Those are your thoughts. I simply on my side reject the idea that human thinking is detached from biology. And you think that you're free to think whatever you want. but you think about everything else that other animals think about. Sex, shit, urinate, eat, and sleep. Those are the things that are on your mind at almost all time.
Speaker 2Now you have the impression that you've unlocked something, which is just a degree of liberty that biology gave you because it happened to have given us very, very open mind. But nature misshoots sometimes. Nature misfires. Nature gives properties to something. that it didn't quite need. It didn't need us to be exactly as free as we are.
Speaker 2And it didn't maybe need to give us all this delusion that we are acting in separation from it, but it did. And it still works because you're going to end up having babies.
Speaker 9But you know what's interesting about the human brain? I'm not separating from biology at all. I'm saying it's this weird biological workaround where the impulse that the brain, like the PFC activates, and then the motor cortex to move your hand on purpose. It's still a biological phenomenon, but it's weird because when it starts from the PFC, it's almost like a different thing entirely.
Speaker 9But I want to say something about baboons and apes. Can I cut you off? Their PFC is huge.
Speaker 5Hold on one second, man. Because I think I can bridge the gap between the two of you, or I'm going to try. Because I think I agree with both of you, and I think there's this kind of a crucial point that will make you both right.
Speaker 5The point that I believe you're trying to make, Amiru, is that the path that you take evolutionarily from genes to behavior is much more deterministic for almost everything and every animal up until the point where humans created this ability for abstraction. You can talk about the PFC if you want, but this ability to subjugate our behaviors to abstract verbal constructs.
Speaker 5particularly to the process of negation, to be able to say instead, I believe this. Instead, we say, well, if it wasn't this, what might it be? So what if not that? So the process of negation actually takes us from a very deterministic route to all the other possibilities except for that deterministic route. So it accelerates dramatically the possibility of change.
Speaker 5But what I think I don't know how to pronounce your last name, but I'm sorry. And I hopped in late. But I think he's trying to say... Thank you. What I think he's trying to say is that ultimately that's still genetically determined. And I believe he's correct. That is still genetically determined because the hardware that your genes gave you in order to do that ability is still your hardware, and that's why you can do it.
Speaker 5So technically, I think you're both correct. It's just that I think... point that you're making that that ability to subjugate yourself to verbal abstraction has huge effects on the directionality of evolution particularly of cultural evolution and maybe uh for me i i i think he's trying to say that you know maybe that wasn't a good thing but i don't want to put words in his mouth
Speaker 5But it's both a good and a bad thing.
Speaker 10You're missing the point. You're missing the point. There's not just humans that are evolving in our body. Our bodies are planetary for other micro... We have a microbiome. We have more cells in your body that are non-human.
Speaker 5I understand that, but that's a separate point. That's not the point that Amir was making.
Speaker 10That has to be the point because that's going to either permeate the Wiseman barrier or it's not.
Speaker 5That's not the point that Amir was making.
Speaker 9No, Kirk is right. Kirk is right.
@joann_marieBut I have a really dumb question. Like this might be like primary school level. I just don't know anything about this. So you know how pigs become wild boars really, really fast after like being in the wild and stuff like that? So they are like... put in a different environment and they, like, adapt to that. So being domesticated is a type of evolution.
@joann_marieLike, pigeons never became wild again. I don't know. Like, maybe in a thousand years they will. Pigs do it really, really quick. So, like, if we introduce a new animal to another environment, it might eventually have evolution, no? Like... I don't know about this stuff. I don't know. I didn't go to college, guys.
Speaker 2When you have lived for millions of years in an environment and you get domesticated in a thousand years, you still carry a lot of the genetic patterns that would allow you, theoretically, to switch everything back on to wildlife. So I'm not surprised that the pigs can become wild again within a few generations. They all have the genetic history still.
Speaker 2They may have one letter of DNA here and there, shutting it all off. And all they need is to turn it back on.
Speaker 10Well, the question is, if they turn it on, is it then passed down to their offspring? Because it seems like the time value implies that it absolutely does. And again, that's why...
Speaker 2If the turning off or on comes from a gene. But see, that's why a single gene or a single series of genes can totally change the form of what you have. The best example of this is males and females in the human species. We are very different physically, very different cognitively. And all of it is ultimately a set of switches that belong to the Y chromosome.
Speaker 2Even men, they still have one X chromosome. So we have the chromosome that gives us all of the information to become a woman. But we have a couple of hop switches in the Y chromosome that say produce testosterone, and this will tell the body all sorts of things. And suddenly you have the exact same genetic program, but expressed in a completely different manner.
Speaker 9Can I pose something to you, Jean, just to challenge your... So if you were for millions of years a boar and then a thousand years you're a pig, well, you've got more time being a boar, so you'll easily revert back. But we were closer to single cell or very few cell organisms, right? But now we have millions and billions.
Speaker 9So we can't very quickly return back to singular or very few cells, right? It would take a long time. I'm just trying to say that transformations can keep happening and we can go back and forth and devolve and evolve, but it's slow and it's difficult. And when you've stacked a lot of cells, isn't it hard to go back? Although if dinosaurs did turn to birds, it shows that it's not.
Speaker 2There is a phenomenon like the one you described, which it's hard to come back. You get locked in into an ecology. But you don't have to get locked in. It can be the case that pigs haven't totally reverted to domesticated life and they have kind of an insurance system in their genome that makes them relatively capable to revert.
Speaker 2Now you say we can't revert to single cells. We could. We could easily. And in fact, that's an hypothesis I explore in my book. I call it a phenotypic separation. It's like, what if a piece of my finger was to fall on a counter and be chopped from my body. And what if it continued to breed its own cells inside my finger, inside my cut off part of my finger?
Speaker 2It's possible. And in fact, I believe it did happen. I called it a phenotypic separation. I'm not willing to test that, just saying that for the record. But in fact, you can argue that it happened because there's a woman who gave her cancer tumor to a lab in the early 20th century and our cells are still kept alive today.
Speaker 2They are still being reproduced because it's one of the model tumors for all laboratories. So in a way she has phenotypically separated. She had had a part of her finger survive her death.
Speaker 9Very interesting conversation, John. We could go forever. So I'm not going to take up too much time. I'm just going to hang around for a bit. Thank you so much for engaging with me. It was a very interesting conversation. Thanks.
Speaker 11I'm learning so much.
Ian MalcolmI don't know anything about you. And Funk, please take this with no disrespect. It's nothing but love. To go perhaps in a very different direction, though, from some of the intellectualism, let's check in with Mr. Funk Machine, who I'm sure has a great question for Jean-Francois.
Speaker 12Oh, my God. I've never been so insulted in my life. Gene, Mr. Gene, how are you going? I hope you're well. I'm doing good. Ian and Joanne, Ian and Joanne, thank you for hosting. It's awesome stuff. Now, Gene, I've got a question for you. What did God say when he made the second Aboriginal?
Speaker 2I have no idea.
Speaker 12He said, fuck it, I burnt another one. Anyway, Gene, I was going to ask you, what are your thoughts? on people who believe in creationism, people who believe... What do you think of creationists? Do you think there is some validation there? Because the title does say devolution of man. And there are a hell of a lot of people that do believe that we're devolving.
Speaker 12We're not actually getting better. We're just getting worse. And the state of existence is actually devolving. So what are your thoughts on people who believe in...
Speaker 2I respect people who believe it, and I am not a militant atheist because I think that religion actually gives good stuff to people, good moral guidance, and it creates great societies, and I'm all for Christianity. However, I don't believe in God, and I simply believe that people are wrong to believe in God. They just imagine something that is not true.
Speaker 2But I'm not like Richard Dawkins in that I... I don't want to fight it because it is still, religion still comes with more positive than negatives.
@joann_marieAll right. Thank you so much.
Speaker 12No worries. That's all I was going to ask. Take care.
Ian MalcolmThank you so much.
Speaker 12Thank you.
Ian MalcolmAnd just out of curiosity.
Speaker 12Get off zero, Gene. Oh, go for it, Frank. Get off zero. I was just going to say get off zero before I sign off. Anyway, take care. See you.
Ian MalcolmThat is a Bitcoin shill, not financial advice, just some loving suggestions from the funky frog. Uh, John, first of all, I'm curious on that, uh, that question there. So the idea of the big bang and evolution verse, uh, creationism, I always thought intelligent design is kind of a curious, uh, intellectual, uh, let's say pursuit in the sense that if we take it that it's the big bang.
Ian MalcolmIf you try to reverse engineer the probability of that happening, it essentially becomes improbable, if not impossible, which then begets that perhaps there was something else that could have constructed the initial, let's say, bang, so to speak. And so I'm just kind of curious for your thoughts on however this came to be.
Ian MalcolmDo you subscribe to that theory that it was some kind of collision that beget the Big Bang? Or do you think it's reasonable for individuals that are... trying to live within science to believe, as wild as it might sound, that perhaps there was some kind of higher being or higher power or higher force other than just pure chance behind all of this?
Speaker 2Well, I believe it's possible that the universe has been created by some kind of superior being. I'm not rejecting the possibility, but I don't see any reason to believe this. That's more my position. As far as the Big Bang goes, I think the Big Bang must be, it has been Judaized, and the Jews have added stuff in the package that we call the Big Bang that shouldn't be added.
Speaker 2The Big Bang starts from the very simple observation that must be true, that there was some expansion in this universe at some point, that there was more heat, there was more compression at some point in the past. And when we try to shoot what that point is in the past, it's something like 13 billion years ago. That is, to me, what the Big Bang is.
Speaker 2And when I say I believe in the Big Bang, that's what I believe in. Now, there's a whole narrative, a romanticized, mythical narrative that was created about the idea that this means that this was all starting from a quantum oscillation, that it was a very low probability event, but it happened. that there was kind of a quantum fluctuation that led to the universe.
Speaker 2All of this is very speculative. And I'm leaving all of it aside. I don't know what causes the first instance of existence. And I don't think we know. And I don't think it's fair to represent it as if we know. I consider that the Big Bang has holes in it, that we don't have answers as to how... Is this a cyclical universe?
Speaker 2Was it happening before? Is it happening inside of a black hole, outside of a black hole, inside of a white hole? All of this to me are open questions. So when I say I believe in the Big Bang, I just believe in the microwave background radiation that we observe in the universe. That must be the case that something generated microwave background radiation.
Speaker 2And that tells us that there was more compression somewhere in the past. That's what I believe in. As far as can God have created this? Sure, a possibility. But if it's a God that created the universe as we know it, I think it's much less likely that it's something like the Christian God who has personal knowledge of you.
Speaker 2And it's more something like a teenager with a very, very powerful computer just messing up the enter key and forgetting to press control C.
Ian MalcolmWell, certainly fair enough. And speaking of some of these higher powers, higher beings or higher ideas, absolutely humbled that we have Mr. David Nietzsche in here. And David, we've gone down an interesting path just to get you up to speed in a really quick condensed version. We've talked Epstein, which JFG had personal not only encounters with, but also funding from.
Ian MalcolmSo had some. interesting takes on what he was doing or trying to do with regards to genetics. We then spent a lot of time on the idea of evolution. We talked a little bit on where man came from, kind of curious on where things are going to go. And so, David, maybe an interesting intellectual experiment for you and JFG to go back on.
Ian MalcolmWhere does all of this go if we do not put the genie that is Jewish supremacy and perhaps AI run by the Jewish supremacists somewhat at bay, not kinetically, but just in terms of their control and power over the world that is. Where does mankind go 100 years from now, David, in your assertion? And then I'll be curious for JFG's thoughts as well.
Speaker 13Straight to hell, I would say.
Ian MalcolmBut I don't- Three words, all it was required.
Speaker 13Yeah, straight to hell. You know, I don't- But I believe in the evolution of consciousness. You know, civilization evolves, but political states devolve. And now we see, of course, that the political state is a way for the worst among us to hunt at the watering hole. You know, it's considered bad form among even some hunters to go hang by the watering hole.
Speaker 13shoot everything that comes near it because, well, you know that that's where it needs to hunt. Even Confucius thought that it was unfair to use a net when fishing. So, you know, it's not very sporting, is it? Well, if you control through financial means the political state, this is hunting at the watering hole. And I certainly think that from an evolutionary standpoint, we will simply rise above this.
Speaker 13You know, they can't do the, they don't exist in sufficient numbers. Now, let's say it was reverse. you know, in the dawn of civilization, there was no comity among people. This was the first time that people started having echelons of, you know, echelons of wealth and class. Before that, civilization for the previous million years had been egalitarian.
Speaker 13You know, hunter-gatherers really don't distinguish much. There's a leader, of course, and then there is a J.D. Vance, you know, who follows along. So one civilization, once we started to live in cities, what it was just, especially about 5,000 years ago, it was at its worst, where they were just killing each other nonstop because, well, that was a much easier way to go achieve wealth.
Speaker 13And they were also driven by the biological necessity of exogamy, which is marrying outside of your specific group. Of course, we know by Jews how bad inbreeding can be for all sorts of psychological reasons. But to answer your question, if it was... In the dawn of civilization, if it was a massively superior number, well, the other people would just get wiped out.
Speaker 13But this isn't the case here. This is a massively inferior number of people ruling over everyone else. Well, you're not going to destroy us all, kill us all. So evolutionarily speaking, we're going to rise above it. It's just inevitable. It's just a matter of waking up to the falsity. And that's the problem. The lies only last for so long.
Speaker 13Every lie. throughout the history of civilization has an expiration date. Every lie has an expiration date. You know, Copernican theory is fairly recent. The idea of a geocentric universe, Ptolemy had a really elegant kind of astronomy that people relied on for a thousand years that basically took into account the idea that, or lived under the presumption...
Speaker 13misapprehension that the earth was at the center of the universe and of course copernicus came in i recommend everybody who can pull it off to read his on the revolutions and uh he just destroyed ptolemaic astronomy and this is the way it's going to be with jewish supremacy i'm sorry but all of the motive force of humanity is behind overcoming this it's a matter of survival
Speaker 13So that's my answer to that question. I was really more interested in the Big Bang question.
Speaker 2Well, those are very nice words, wise words that you've said. And I share your ideas on this, absolutely. I do think there is much white pilling to be had in the fact that you look at something like Gaza, and it's like they deployed the most horrific methods of war we've seen in modern times. And not even half of the Gazans are killed.
Speaker 2So it's like no matter what they do, and this must be very frustrating for the Jews. I love to imagine in their mind how they experience the fact they must see us like cockroaches to an extent because it's like no matter what we do, like the way they tried going at me with my reputation, with all these mainstream media articles that all made me more popular.
Speaker 2And it all led me to more women calling me and saying, oh, Jeff. They're saying you're a murderer, but I'm still going to breed with you. And I'm like, no matter what they do, if we reproduce and if we keep our line of morals, principles and advancement in our own existence, there's really nothing they can do. You know, Marx had this whole idea of capital as evil and as a form of death.
Speaker 2And he was right in a way. But at the same time, what he failed to understand is there is a massive lack of power. When your power is so theoretical, so financial in nature, you can have a big footprint, a big apparent footprint on a nation. But ultimately, down the line, people are free from your trickery, and they can evolve without you.
Speaker 13Well, in Marx's day, Bakunin and Proudhon were both socialists. a kind and they were anarchic socialists they believed that bakunin famously said and he was unfortunately imprisoned by the romanovs when he was supposed to appear at that same socialist conference uh for which marx and engels wrote the communist manifesto and this is sort of a rush job which makes it so childish and um makuna couldn't make it but he said that basically a marxist revolutionary uh existence would be
Speaker 13within a year way worse than the Romanovs. And of course, he was right about that. Well, why? Because Marx didn't love the proletariat, he hated the bourgeoisie. His whole philosophy, wink, wink, nudge, nudge, I hope everybody's not missing the hint here, it represented a complete misanthropy and antipathy for humans. Now, who does that sound like?
Speaker 13It sounds very Khazarian, it sounds very much like Jewish supremacy to me. And so, yes, I absolutely agree with you. And think about this now when you said, you know, they tried to crush you, tried to step on you. Think about this. If you turn the chessboard around and ask yourself this question, if you're a small group of people whose main way of prospering is the expense of humanity, if your modus operandi, your shtick, is to go into civilizations and undermine them,
Speaker 13then the real war that you have to make, given your paucity of numbers, is on the mind, is on one's capacity to reason. And George Orwell saw this in the whole double think. Everything that George Orwell is talking about, double think and, you know, inverting the words, all of this is to cause confusion. Don't be confused, folks.
Speaker 13Don't be confused. Don't be, oh, what's happening? No, it's not confusing at all. your mind and your capacity to reason, you can ask yourself, is this right or wrong? And you're damn right, it's right. And that's, it's wrong. I'm sorry what they're doing. And they count on causing that confusion, causing that division.
Speaker 13So just imagine if you were them and you turn the chessboard around and you say, okay, we own all the megaphones. We control the financial systems. We control the media. We control the education systems. We even control the military. And yet all we lack is the advantage. Because throughout history, the atomic power of being on the side of truth, equanimity, kindness, and reason wins, wins, wins.
Speaker 13It is like a cancer if you side with the other side. You are destined to lose. You are the house divided against itself. And that's what's happening now. And anybody thinking about this now who's afraid and quivering, oh, they're going to call me names. They're going to make me feel bad. They're going to say I'm the bad person.
Speaker 13You're going to wake up 30 years from now and be ashamed that you didn't stand up and speak out because we are going to win. The truth is going to win. It always does. We're on the precipice of that right now. The whole world is waking up to it. Have the guts. Be part of the people that have the guts. And if you do... then you share the lineage of our forefathers.
Speaker 13You share the lineage of people who stood on Sterling Bridge and fought the Brits. You share the lineage of people who stood in Thermopylae Pass and at least held back the great and wonderful Persian Empire for a while. You stand with the people who fought barefoot in the snow against the greatest power on earth and created the dream which is America, not anything resembling what it is today.
Speaker 13So yes, speak out and stand up because the truth is going to win out. What do you think about that, my friend?
Speaker 2Absolutely. Very inspiring, and I agree.
Ian MalcolmJames, I'm kind of curious for your thought on this. So David mentioned there this kind of willpower of man, and I fully agree with him. And I really do believe that white pill, that we're going to win. And I think it's inevitable just because they now have only the options of suppress everybody's speech so that more people don't hear what we're saying.
Ian Malcolmwhich validates the various suggestions that we make, or to let us continue doing what we're doing and we wake up everybody. And so either way, people are going to catch on to what is taking place and transpiring, which they will then be able to triangulate their frustrations, their anger, whether it's the, let's say, never-ending wars, whether it's COVID and all of the prospective deaths that I believe are going to happen because of the vaccine, on and on and on we go.
Ian MalcolmAnd so I think this is a... done deal in the sense that we will be able to win. It's just uncertainty around how we get there, which brings me to the question, is this something that's just happened over and over and over again, akin to the story of The Matrix for anybody that watched the whole trilogy, where Neo basically figures out, hey, you're just the seventh or the eighth or the tenth or the hundredth iteration of this movement that's going to reject this power structure, which will then force function it back into
Ian Malcolmthe early stages of its control, and it will just go around and around, and we just kind of chase this good-evil dynamic over and over and over again. Do you think this has happened time and time again, perhaps in ways that some of which we know, like some of the expulsions that are more recent, but if we think of maybe the dawn of mankind, is it possible that this game has been going on literally for the eons?
Ian MalcolmAnd it just will never go away because it is maybe as basic or primitive as good and evil itself.
Speaker 2Oh, definitely. The game is repeating. And you just have to read the Romans in the Bible and understand that Jesus was victim of canceled culture. Jesus was subjected to exactly what other canceled people in the 90s, 2000s, and 2010s were subjected to.
Speaker 2And it was targeted by the exact same mechanism, the exact same denunciations, the exact same lies. And it's like, yeah, this has been going on again and again and forever. And it's kind of a fatality. It's not so dramatic that it will happen again. It's just we have to realize that beyond these iterations, life continues.
Speaker 2Ultimately, we are faced with the iteration of eternal parasitism. That's what's happening. And this will happen. In fact, Jews existing or not, there will always be forces of evil within humanity that will grow, that will exploit others, that will be violent toward others, that will kill others. And the game of life is outliving them and outbreeding them.
Speaker 13What about the corporate revolution? I don't think they'll always will though, right? Because what do they trade upon? They trade upon your needs. They trade upon people living in exiguous poverty. I mean, the future becomes more and more or less and less a zero-sum game. Aristotle said that knowledge is superior, which is furthest from our senses because it's applicable to a multitude of circumstances.
Speaker 13Well, ladies and gentlemen, I give you quantum physics. And the way that we're able to understand discrete qualities and facts of the universe in order to inveigle her secrets and live much more effortlessly. You know, I predict that one day, for instance, no one will live in giant mansions because it doesn't actually make you any happier.
Speaker 13People are acquisitive, meaning they're constantly pursuing the fetish of acquiring things and pursuing things. And the very people that immiserate us trade on this sort of fetishist way of thinking and inspire it and encourage it, of course. And I do think that we'll rise above that as well, because humans in the long stretch of time will disambiguate what merely gives them pleasure versus what makes them happy.
Speaker 2do you think about that well in evolution there is no such thing as a stable state so it's always in a sedation there's more predators and you think oh they're going to eat all the praise and there's a there's a lack of prey now but eventually too much predators interfere with one another they eat each other's praise and eventually some of them die their population reduces and the praise rise again eventually there are so many praise that
Speaker 2The predators start being advantaged. And it's like there's so many rabbits around. We can have 10 baby wolves. And it's always an oscillation like this. And there is nothing to get you out of this. It's conditional to existence. You cannot exist as a living being without accepting the inherent fact that you're going to be stuck in eternal oscillations.
Speaker 2of good and bad, and predators and preys, and eating and not eating, and famine, and good food. So you're always stuck within an equilibrium that oscillates.
Ian MalcolmLet's go to Best of the Goyim, who's joined us.
Speaker 3Can you hear me? I think dancing was before me, actually.
Speaker 13I was dancing before you.
@joann_marieYeah, go for the dancing and then we'll go back.
Speaker 13I'm dancing right now.
Speaker 14Hey, good to see everyone here. I had a few questions about since Jean-Francois runs NeuroTV and has a background in brain research, I had a few questions about Traumatic brain injury and neuroplasticity. I have a number of friends that have traumatic brain injuries and are recovering from trauma of various kinds. As you know, a lot of people, especially in urban areas, are riding scooters.
Speaker 14People are falling off scooters and getting hit by drunk drivers. And brain injuries are just skyrocketing now. And so I do know a lot of people that are recovering. I'm helping a lot of people through their journey. And I have my own post-traumatic stress disorder from having my head cracked against a brick wall. I don't know how many people know that, but that is the case.
Speaker 14And so my shock and surprise in dealing with the government and the health industry, hospitals, pharmaceutical industries, is that there seems to be an enormous amount of gatekeeping when it comes to trying to get information, trying to get therapies, trying to get knowledge, trying to get support that's accurate. And as I've learned through X-Spaces,
Speaker 14a lot of those industries or all of those industries are headed by Jews. And it seems to be they're really very interested in keeping people sick and keeping people dependent. And as I've learned, there are a lot of really interesting, exciting technologies that are coming out that involve things like vagus stimulation, home-based VR, things like that.
Speaker 14and other research that looks at gut brain access and the effects of chronic low-grade inflammation and other stressors on the erosion of IQ over decades, things like that. But I also know that there's a lot of really glaring absences of research that don't... don't look at things like the differences between men and women in the hormones that are in the brain.
Speaker 14Like a lot of things that you would have thought would have been very well researched. And I'm wondering with your background, do you experience a lot of gatekeeping from the Jews in your research? Is there, are there things that you think that should be fundraised more for or looked at more or, or you know, published more about that, that the Jews are trying to withhold from people that are dealing with traumatic brain injuries and that are worried about the loss of IQ over time.
Speaker 14And are there things that can keep the IQ from diminishing over time if you're dealing with traumatic brain injury? I know that's a lot of questions. So if you just want to.
Speaker 2Well, for brain injuries, I would say there's not a single answer and it depends on the brain injury. There's many ways to approach it. Just rehabilitation, physiological training. It's very hard to go through without the details of the brain injury. As far as gatekeeping, it's the mode of academia right now. The totality of the academia is under full gate kept control.
Speaker 2So you cannot make it in academia if you don't hide the kind of beliefs that I have, which is why I eventually gave up. Now, so this is the gatekeeping. Now, I don't believe that there's gatekeeping. I don't believe there's secret, massive knowledge that we don't have access to publicly that would allow to heal people.
Speaker 2What there is often, though, is the fact that the academia doesn't look into the very important and obvious things that could ruin modern life. I'm thinking about, for example, there's a massive correlation between living in the city where there's fluoride in the water versus living in artesian well places where there's much less anxiety if you live in an artesian well place.
Speaker 2So if you drink natural water that comes from nature, that has been filtered by the ground like our ancestors did, or in reverse, you are living a much more healthy life already than in the city because they keep recycling the same water that comes from the sewers and who knows what's left in there, medications hanging in there, fluoride additives, and eventually you end up ingesting all of this.
Speaker 2So there are so many things in modernity that we don't investigate at all in the academia. And yes, it's due to gatekeeping. It's due to the fact that there are some truths that the system doesn't want to spit out. And it's a big problem that we have a system that is our science, which is supposedly, we're supposedly sending our best to go find the truth for us.
Speaker 2But we can't even say the truth anymore in academia. We can't even say basic truths that every scientist knows is true about race, for instance. So we have completely converted academia into a governmental organism that is incapable of seeking things that would inform everyone just because we have all of these rules, these equality, equity, inclusion, diversity, et cetera.
Speaker 2So, and we're not even beginning to, to find things that would actually challenge the system. Like no one will ever do the studies that would be required to determine if vaccines are actually bad for you in the very long term. They all do this little study. Let's do three months. Let's see if people die. Oh, people don't die after three months.
Speaker 2Then the vaccine is safe. No, no. I want a study that looks into a causal double-blind study looking into vaccines over 18 years. And I want to know what happens with these people. I want to know if they end up having babies. You never get these studies. You get these loose correlative studies that tell you everything is fine, don't worry.
Speaker 2We've looked into it.
Speaker 5I might be able to shed a light on a couple more of your questions, dancing as a neuroscientist as well. I have looked into traumatic brain injury, and unfortunately, I hate to report that it's one of the things, kind of like Alzheimer's, that I don't think there's really any proven treatment for. There were a few things tried if you were able to treat immediately after the injury.
Speaker 5I think some NMDA receptor blockers or benzodiazepines, basically trying to block. There's a hyper excitability that happens after brain injury. And they tried to block that process by various means. And NMDA receptor blockers basically shut down your brain activity. But I don't think any of this stuff actually worked.
Speaker 5So the only suggestion that I can give to you is the same suggestion they give to stroke patients and other patients with other types of brain injuries, which is basically to exercise. So do your trained physical therapy on the focal aspects that you have for certain deficiencies and combine that with exercise, particularly getting your heart rate up above 150 and so on.
Speaker 5And that's about the best you can do. I agree with everything that John said as far as everything else, 100%. I'll add one more thing about the male and female thing and why they don't study women. There's an unfortunate reality that almost all studies are done in mice. And in order to do a study in mice, for female mice, you have to check what stage of the estrous cycle they're in, which basically involves paying a bunch of people to go down and look at mouse vaginas every single day on the same study, which is incredibly cost prohibitive.
Speaker 5And the problem is if you, estrogen affects literally everything in the brain, like absolutely everything. So the problem is if you catch that mouse in the wrong time of its estrous cycle, you get completely different results. So that means you have to inflate your sample size and you have to inflate your cost. So it's a very, very unfortunate reality that we don't have good studies for a lot of things for women.
Speaker 5But at the end of the day, actually, it would still probably be useless even if we did because when it comes to psychological conditions, the NIH no longer even funds psychological models in rodents because almost all the data that we have about psychological illness from rodents is garbage. Everything they ever tried to move into humans in terms of drugs never worked.
Speaker 5I'll land it there.
@joann_marieAnd what about Semax? You know, like that Russian nootropic drug that is out there? Like Semax apparently helps with... Because I've known people that have tried Semax and apparently it's good for them. I don't know. I've never tried it. Has anyone heard of Semax?
Speaker 2I don't know about it.
@joann_marieOh, okay. You guys should look into it because they do have some crazy research that we don't have in the West that they have, like... reversed a lot of like crazy stuff and also stem cells. I think if you like do those intermittent, when you stop breathing, you create stem cells and stuff like that, that might help your brain as well.
Speaker 5There are some studies on stem cells for traumatic brain injury. I was involved in the start of one, but I never got much past that because I left. I think it's possible that that could be the avenue going forward for brain injury is stem cell. But beyond that, I don't know that there's much hope for a lot of these things.
Speaker 5It's kind of like brain diseases suck, unfortunately. There's just almost very little we can do about any of them.
@joann_marieLooking to CEMEX and all those Russian drugs, seriously, it's pretty crazy what they have out there.
Speaker 14Definitely. I have my friends looking into trying to get into studies involving PBM neurostimulation, nanopatch stem cells and things like that, because he's recovered dramatically in the last year and he's doing extremely well. And his doctors are really kind of shocked that he's doing as well as he is. But in looking at the research that's out there, he did he did get some some he went to one of the.
Speaker 14trauma hospitals here in the Bay area immediately went to Zuckerberg hospital and was treated right away with one of their front of the line. I believe he was treated with plasma right away, which is one of the front of the line treatments that they give people. And that does have something that is readily able to help people with traumatic brain injury.
Speaker 14But we're still looking for other things that can help because over time, You do lose IQ if you have traumatic brain injury. And I just really, I'm kind of beside myself worried that, you know, why isn't there more research into this and why isn't it going faster? Is there gatekeeping? And I really appreciate the answers here.
Speaker 14And I will look into the thing that Joanne mentioned because I do feel like there's not a lot here to do. And I just, I don't want to lose my friend. I don't want to lose any of my friends that have traumatic brain injury. And I certainly worry about myself sometimes too.
@joann_marieI'll message you the names of the people that I know that have tried CEMAX and they apparently had amazing results. I've never tried it, so I don't know. But yeah.
Ian MalcolmAnd JFG, I'm kind of curious. I actually asked this question. We had a wonderful space the other day with an individual on here who's really looked into COVID and the vaccine. And I asked him about different things that he would recommend. that people do and what would be kind of the easiest thing for people to incorporate into their life.
Ian MalcolmAnd so I'm kind of curious for your thoughts, just a little bit more holistically, whether it's, you know, a specific rendition of exercise or of health or of dietary. If you were based on things you've looked into in the past, I know it's a little bit off topic, but just best practices for people. Are there, are there, you know, three or five little bullets that you could give?
Ian Malcolmthat you think are ideal for people to kind of maximize their health and wellness, whether it's of the mind, the brain, the body, the soul, what have you?
Speaker 2Well, I'm not a health expert and I'm a fat artist myself. So I'm not in a position to give much good counseling. And people will hate me for this one. But personally, what I love, and I've just stopped caffeine because all my life I was drinking Diet Pepsi. I converted to Gatorade Zero. Drink some Gatorade Zero. It will put you in a zen state.
Speaker 2It has all the electrolytes. Go for Gatorade Zero. It's going to stabilize your system. Zero calorie. That's what I recommend for a peaceful life in line with nature.
Ian MalcolmI don't think anybody will critique the latter of the two. And Gatorade Zero, that's a curious one for the audience.
Speaker 3Um, but uh, but with that let's I know we got a lot of hands up here and best of the gentiles I know was uh up after dancing and then we'll go down to uh Longevity and then check in with prashan and then go to mr. Amaro So, yeah, I I popped in like to the space like immediately when the um, this whole big bang, um Conversation was going off and uh, I don't know if that's what this space is is really on topic with
Speaker 3But I call absolutely 100% bullshit on the Big Bang. Something out of nothing and then organic life out of that nothing. That to me is a scientist that can't explain something. So they make up a illogical first place to move from. and i posted a video of james tour in the purple pill who is a world-renowned organic chemist and i highly recommend everyone who has any doubts on there being a divine creator to go watch that video that i post it's just a four minute video i even have it queued up if you want me to play the audio right now but anyone that has doubts you listen to that
Speaker 3and you'll come away knowing that it's absolutely bullshit with the Big Bang of matter coming out of nothing. So that's my two cents, and I'll leave it right there. All right.
Speaker 2Now, as I said, I don't necessarily believe that it had to come from nothing. I think that part is mythological, but I simply believe we see a microwave background radiation. Therefore, it seems that... Space has expanded, and we were once more compressed. Now, Jan, I have to leave for three minutes. I'll be back, okay?
Speaker 11Sounds good.
Ian MalcolmWell, I will say this about... Before those three, we will have David play elevator music.
Speaker 13No, I'm kidding. I will say this. So, first of all, I don't impute... Astrophysicists would be the ones to consult on cosmology, so the origins and nature of the universe. and all the physics and math works that doesn't make it absolutely true there really is no absolute truth there really isn't because you cannot step outside of your own consciousness and experience that we actually don't even experience objects directly so this is this is locke's idea that was expounded upon by all the other epistemologists that came after him we just experienced the result of them and the light that comes into your eyes and the feeling that you get in your hands uh but
Speaker 13As far as something coming out of nothing, the problem I think that we have is the way we think about this nothing. It's a matter of consciousness. It's true of time as well. You know, there's only one space. There's only one time. It is a process of mental abstraction that we divide it, that we think of it in multiplicity.
Speaker 13And space is also, it's really both of the, space is an anti-concept. because we only think of it in terms of the objects that fill it. We don't actually, how do you think of nothing outside of a Zen monastery? For instance, you notice if you say, well, how far are the distances between you and something else? And when we describe empty space, we always describe it in terms of physical objects, because it's the only way that consciousness can grasp it.
Speaker 13So we'll say it's this many feet, because feet are physical objects, or this many, this, that. We always think in terms of, the relationship between objects, and that's all that space is. So when we say nothing, it's just we are grasping more and more. It's becoming the province of philosophy of exactly what is this nothing.
Speaker 13And the same with time. What is time? You know, if you want to side on the side of the numinous like you're doing, I like Thomas Aquinas' definition of eternity as the everlasting now. Well, now is all you really experience. So this is why cosmology, by the way, has sort of gone away as a separate science, because what physicists know about, and this is our friend here was alluding to it with microwaves, what physicists know about these square feet of the present kind of tells them about the evolution of the universe.
Speaker 13The Higgs boson, for instance, was famously predicted to exist long before it was recently discovered to exist. It was inferred that it would have been necessary to exist if you had this sort of explosion or outward evolution of the universe. But that doesn't make it absolutely true. But I don't invalidate it by saying, well, they all have this prejudice or they're trying to prove that God doesn't exist.
Speaker 13But why would the idea of God and the Big Bang be mutually exclusive to begin with? Of course, they're not.
Speaker 3That to me just proves that God does exist as far as everything that you said right there. Yeah, we don't have an idea of this space, you know, three feet between you and I and everything like that. God is behind everything. It's behind the microwaves that we can detect. It's behind, however you want to look at it, that we have multidimensionals or multidimensions going on.
Speaker 3There is a divine creed. There's no way that this order came out of no order, is my point.
Speaker 13Well, yeah, that's teleology, right? So, you see all of this, and you infer an intended or planned universe. Now, irrespective of where other people stand... Like I said, just go watch the video for anyone that truly has questions. Well, I can defend your point of view, at least in this way. I know... how it is that you arrive at that because of the elegance and all of the things that we're talking about.
Speaker 13So I don't, you know, I understand that point of view. And I guess we both agree that these two ideas are not mutual exclusive. So, you know, that's a reasonable position to land on.
Speaker 3No, everything that you just described, I 100% agree with. I just put a divine creator. that is behind there. All the math and all the science that everyone can prove from all the stuff that has happened at CERN, all that is through a divine creator.
Ian MalcolmDavid, did you want to respond to that?
Speaker 13No, I will say this. The idea that the divine creator is a natural concomitant of the laws of the universe. That's really sort of a deistic point of view. And a great many, you know, that was, I think Descartes shared that point of view, so did Spinoza, so I totally understand it.
Ian MalcolmI love it. And I think JFG is probably going to be joining back here any minute, but while we're waiting for him, why don't we check in with Mr. Longevity? I'm back. Oh, perfect. All right, let's go to Mr. Longevity and see if he has a question for JFG.
@joann_marieLongevity?
Speaker 13I guess he didn't have much longevity.
Ian MalcolmI was going to say, this is an interesting one. Maybe this is actually part of the ruse, is the longevity of waiting for longevity. Let's go to Prashant and see if longevity is playing the long game for us.
Speaker 15Good afternoon or good evening is afternoon for me here in Hawaii. But I popped up because I heard people talking about brain injury and vaccines. And I also wanted to comment on something that David said. And I don't remember exactly what he said. Maybe he'll be able to fill me in. But he talked about how can there be nothing in the mind?
Speaker 15Did you say something like that, David?
Speaker 13I'm saying that the idea of nothing is an anti-concept because. Anything, any idea or mind object, which ideas are mind objects, all concepts are, there's something defining about it. And then how do you define nothing? Well, you end up trying to define nothing by the something around it. And so there's a bit of a paradox in giving this idea of nothingness, giving it thinghood, which is inevitably what happens.
Speaker 13when we talk about space.
Speaker 15Thank you for that. The reason I came up, because I misunderstood what you said. I thought you said about there can be nothing in the mind. And I've experienced that that's just not true. And the reason is because I spent 25 years with a yoga master from India, and there's a science of the mind. Yoga is really the science of the mind.
Speaker 15And he taught us methods to... Empty your mind to the point of absolutely no thoughts. And you have to do the methods properly, and you have to do them more than likely. Most people have to do them for a long time and regularly. But then you can get to a state of nothing in the mind, no thoughts in the mind. And so that's not related to what you said, but I thought it was, so that's why I brought it up.
Speaker 13Well, there's the capacity to still the mind. is also the capacity to discover your true self.
Speaker 15Oh, absolutely.
Speaker 13And as someone who lived in a Zen monastery, I can attest to this. And I tell people, you know, eternity is between your thoughts. Quiescence and this ultimate peace, it's between your thoughts. And the idea that your mind is always racing or carrying you away or, you know, running amok, well, of course, this is the thing that you want to overcome, which is why
Speaker 13pinned to my profile, I say, he who rules himself cannot be ruled to others because this is, and this was sort of like, I didn't go too far down the road because I think it would have gotten too philosophical, but when I was talking about how the future will turn out, the more people rule themselves and have this dominion over their own consciousness and their own mind and understand it, then the less people will be, other people will be able to credit upon them.
Speaker 13So actually, I'm glad you brought up This point of view, my friend, I think it's important for people to understand.
Speaker 15No, I agree. And you came from a Zen background and I came from a yoga background. And very few people know what real yoga is. Yoga is literally the science of the mind. And there's four books called the Yoga Sutras. And they go into great, great, great detail, intricate detail on the steps of quieting your mind. I studied the books a couple of times through all four of them already.
Speaker 15It takes a year and a half or so. And I'm doing it again, even now. And then when you study the books and then you do the practices, you get even a deeper, more subtle understanding of how your mind works and how you can come to control it so that people can't do what you said people are trying to do to your mind. But anyway, that was a side subject.
Speaker 15I came up because of the brain injury issue. Because in 2002, I was working on the railroad and I was putting a handbrake on the rear end of a tank car, pulling really, really hard. and the mechanism broke and I flew up out and back to the ground and my hip hit first and my head hit second and I got a traumatic brain injury.
Speaker 15But the interesting thing about it and the horrific thing about it was when they took me to the hospital half conscious, my head was bleeding because my head had hit the ground and they gave me the Tdap shot for the tetanus portion of it. And so I not only had a traumatic brain injury, which was horrific and took me a couple of years to come out of it,
Speaker 15But I had a vaccine injury also on top of it. And that was even more horrific. I mean, I was literally autistic at 52 for a couple of years on top of a traumatic brain injury. But what I wanted to say about it is you can heal. And I never took a single drug. I never took any protocols from any Western medicine. I did the practices that I told you about.
Speaker 15And I... I've been studying diet since I was 20 years old. And I just did, when my brain started functioning again after, I had to go, I'm sorry, I'm a little scattered, but I had to go to therapists like five and six days a week, different therapists, just to keep me from doing something out of my control. I mean, I was making plans in my mind to go rape women because a traumatic brain injury can either take your sexuality away or can magnify it.
Speaker 15And for me, it magnified it. And I was making plans in my mind. Literally solid plans on going and raping women. And I'd have to go scream that at my therapist. You guys got to help me. I'm going to go rape a woman. You guys got to help me.
Speaker 13Wait, you want the therapist to help you rape women? Come on.
Speaker 15Are you being funny? It wasn't funny. It wasn't funny at the time. It was hellish. And on top of a vaccine injury. But when I was able to start functioning a little bit again, I just went to my diet knowledge. I completely cleaned up my diet. I did the best of everything I taught myself about diet. And then when I got a little better through the diet, I went back to those practices that I'm talking about of yoga, the real practices of yoga.
Speaker 15And one of the practices of yoga is called pranayama. That's breathing practices. And I was taught beginning through highly advanced practices. And when you master those practices and do them correctly and regularly, you get control of the bioelectric energy in your body. And the bioelectric energy in your body is a very healing thing, especially when you get control of it.
Speaker 15So that's what I wanted to share, that you can heal from both vaccine injuries and traumatic brain injuries. And you can do it without drugs. Diet is, I think, a very important thing. And I would say something like David did, Zen, or something like I did, real. yoga, not commercial stupid yoga that the US puts on everybody, but the real thing.
Speaker 15So that's what I wanted to share. You can heal from both vaccine and brain injuries. And I did it.
Speaker 13I want you to know that it's very inspiring that in a world of people who portray themselves as the helpless plaything of the universe, you had these real difficulties and you took control. You took agency. I think if you don't do it already, you should do, you probably already do, but you should do spaces on this because, you know, the idea that you're saying, well, I'm going to do everything I can to heal myself.
Speaker 13I mean, that's just, that's really inspiring to hear, my friend.
Speaker 15Yeah, well, you know, on top of what I said, I haven't been to a doctor in 55 years. I've taken no over-the-counter prescription drugs for 55 years. I had full coverage health insurance at my job at the railroad and I have Medicare. I never used any of them from any doctor for any sickness ever. When do I get my refund for all the insurance premiums I paid?
Ian MalcolmNo, and real quickly, I wanted to add this. I received from a friend who's listening in the space that said that they wanted to just add in with TBI, so traumatic brain injury, that he was dealing with, that sleep, exercise, staying hydrated, and working on hand-eye coordination. were some of the biggest things that helped him overcome it, including gaming.
Ian MalcolmAnd so just maybe a positive to video games that we would often lament because they can be kind of rotting of the brain and have other detrimental effects. But when it comes to hand-eye coordination, a good way to work on that. And for traumatic brain injuries, I just want to call that out because, again, somebody in the comments suggesting that was a wonderful thing that helped them.
Speaker 5um hopefully anybody listening that is dealing with this that might be something to uh to consider you know i'd like to have a question for prashant if i can something he said was really interesting to me yeah go for it yeah hey prashant i think we've talked before so you said you got the the tdap shot at the same time that you had this brain injury and the the tdap vaccine has aluminum phosphate in it which is an adjuvant
Speaker 5And for people in here probably know what that does, but that basically makes your body create an immune response to things that are happening at that time. And that's why people worry about autoimmune disease. So it could have caused your body to create an immune reaction to some things in your brain at the same time.
Speaker 5Did you find that your symptoms changed if you were ever sick or if you took another vaccine? or if something affected your immune system, did that ever change your symptoms or not?
Speaker 15Well, it did in a positive way because I never did nor would I ever take another vaccine. I never came near the COVID shot. I went to jail during COVID time because I refused to wear a mask in a health food store. But I noticed the changes, but in a good direction because of the things that I did, Kirk. As I said, as I started to be able to function again, as they kept me...
Speaker 15functioning you know therapy five five to six days a week different therapists they kept me functioning and slowly i think your body's always trying to heal itself and my history of of you know at that point uh you know 30 years of nutrition i started working on that and then like i said after that i started to do these yoga practices and the change i noticed was not in a bad way it was in a good way so no there was never there was never any
Speaker 15more negative effects other than what happened, period. I mean, my teeth, all my teeth, I had really perfect teeth because I've been a surfer since 1969. So I was always in the sun and eat good food. So I had big, strong teeth. But one of the things the vaccine did was in a couple of days, half of my teeth broke up and fell out of my mouth.
Speaker 15And I found out that that can be caused by vaccines. And it did to me. And the other thing is that I was blinded in one eye, either by the brain injury, but more likely by the vaccine from the brain trauma. So what I wanted to say about that is I'm blind in one eye, but I still surf at 75 years old. And the reason that's important is because where does balance come?
Speaker 15It comes from two functioning eyes. I only have one functioning eye and I still surf. And it takes an incredible amount of balance because the surface is constantly changing in height and in every way. But you have to have incredible balance. And I somehow have that with just one eye, not two. And that amazes me.
Speaker 5Amazing story, man. Amazing story. I've got to go soon. I want to ask John one question before I leave, if that's all right. But, yeah. Yeah, go for it. I don't think he's back, is he? I'm here. Oh, God, sorry. Okay. So I've had this sort of theory for a while. I hopped in later and I heard you talking about basically mercantile ethics.
Speaker 5and now we've basically become a society of merchant class ethics, which is despicable in my view. I have sort of a theory about Europeans. So if you look across the world history, it seems to me that more militant or militarily successful cultures also seem to be more honest to some degree. At the extreme end, you might have Indians who are militarily terrible and they're completely dishonest, and Jews who are terrible at basically infantry warfare.
Speaker 5totally dishonest. And then you have the Germans and the Germanic tribes basically being, basically the Germanic tribes, man for man, are militarily the most successful. They also tend to be autistically honest. And I have a slight theory about this, which is that during which time period, I'm not sure, maybe across many time periods, but there may have been selection of immediate fatal violence for people who were even slightly dishonest.
Speaker 5for what reason, whether it's a personality characteristic of Germanics, because we know that German people really do not like dishonesty, they don't like ambiguity, they don't like not being able to expect what's coming, and they can be a tad aggressive. So I have this theory somewhat the Europeans were essentially a warrior people, and the warrior people use fatal violence against dishonest members of the tribe.
Speaker 5and that that actually selected for honesty in European populations. What are your thoughts on that?
Speaker 2Yeah, this is the idea of Kurt Doolittle, as far as I know, maybe by others also, but I've heard it from Kurt Doolittle. And yeah, it makes sense. Military culture may require more inward punishment than just regular living. And so if you're... If you're not in either a sort of sport or competitive culture that truly can lead to death, then you are left to no selection at all.
Speaker 2And so you can't farm honesty into your population.
Speaker 5Yeah, there's also some research on guilt versus shame cultures. I don't know if you're familiar with this, usually in contrasting East and West. I'm very curious if you know, I haven't done a huge deep dive into this, but I really believe having spent a lot of time in both parts of the world, that there's a very, very serious difference in the possibly genetically encoded ability to feel certain emotions that are peculiar to Westerners.
Speaker 5Asians really do not feel guilt in the same way. that we do as far as I've seen. It seems that their emotional reactions are essentially socially programmed, much more of a blank slate, as you will. It's like you will feel this thing at this particular time if other people are looking at you and making you feel it. And if they're not doing that, you don't have to feel it and it doesn't matter.
Speaker 5Whereas Europeans can be alone in a field with nobody around and be plagued with this internal sense of guilt for not following their you could actually say abstract programs right so their abstract morality they have these abstract so it's actually a prerequisite for the type of morality that europeans have to have abstract verbal reasoning skills and one of the reasons that asians i think don't have our same moral composition is because their verbal capacity is very very different they're really not abstract
Speaker 5And I think that's partly why. So I think they have different social emotions and they lack the exquisite verbal abstraction ability of Europeans, which allows us to subjugate our emotions to our own sort of statements of moral fact. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Speaker 2Absolutely. I agree. There are moral differences. And I recommend reading Kurt Doolittle about this. Kevin McDonald, I think, has a whole treatise for individualism in the West. We are very different subspecies of humanity.
Speaker 13By definition, language abstracts. So I don't know how it is that anybody has a language and doesn't abstract. The second thing is that anybody that manages scientific ideas or reasoning in any way, this happens through a process of abstraction where they isolate facts of existence and then reintegrate them in new concepts.
Speaker 13So I'm not sure in what way that you're saying that people in the in the in the world of how to say I would say it's sort of the level of abstraction.
Speaker 5So one of the things that like English does is it breaks apart like the relationship between words that which has been and we have a word for has and and been and to the we have these these sort of very abstract joiners. So there's sort of high context and low context languages. And it seems to me that in some of these languages where you reach an abstraction of an abstraction, almost like a meta abstraction, you get people thinking about the nature of the meta abstraction more than in other cultures.
Speaker 5I'm not saying it's impossible for these cultures to do that, but it's very difficult. I think they're like a couple of levels below the meta abstraction. as it were. Actually, I think this is a good thing for them, actually. This is one of the reasons why the Eastern cultures are not nearly... Actually, the Slavs are the same.
Speaker 5The Slavs and the Eastern cultures don't seem to be as polluted by the mind viruses of the woke West. Those are very, very much related to speaking English, most of all, and Germanic languages, second of all. And I think that...
Speaker 13I would say it's more... I would say it's more of who's ruled by Jewish supremacy. I mean, wokeism is just foisted upon us by Jewish supremacists, don't you? Don't you think that's true? I mean, why would a homogeneous civilization ever promote wokeism? I can't imagine that happening. Can you?
Speaker 5So, I think a homogeneous civilization is more resistant to it, sure. But the Germans, I think even if they remained homogeneous, would still be incredibly susceptible to wokeism because of their tendency towards absolutism and their extremely high verbal abstraction ability and their high indoctrinated ability. They also have an intolerance of contradictions.
Speaker 5So one of the things with Asian cultures is they really, really don't seem to be as intolerant of contradictory behavior based on principle as the Western people. So in Japan, they will do you can point out to them that something contradicts the principle and they'll be like, uh, okay, but this is what's expected. And they don't really care.
Speaker 5And they almost see it as somewhat immature to get too caught up in absolutism. They don't actually see it as a lofty goal like the Germanic cultures do, and it protects them. So, you know, there's Jewish supremacy and there's susceptibility to Jewish supremacy. It doesn't have to be a binary thing, right? You're more or less susceptible to it.
Speaker 5It exists. And I'm just pointing out that different cultures have certain things which make them a little more susceptible or a little less susceptible.
Speaker 13Well, if you read, for instance, the seven sages of the ancient world, the pre-Socratics, they were all monadists. They were always looking for some primary substance, some primary sort of fundamental premise of consciousness and existence. Well, they were doing that in these two. And they just worked at it and arrived at it from different points of view.
Speaker 13So if you read Thales or Pythagoras, they were doing things that were surprisingly similar to what people were doing in the East. And you can see this in the Vedas or the Buddhist canons or the I Ching. Or even through Lao Tzu or Confucius to some point. So I'm not sure that I... I think that it's the nature of the human consciousness to try to...
Speaker 13to try to uproot contradictions because it's the most obvious, the base objective of any reasoning person is to have the pleasure of agreeing with themselves, to have a theory of the world that doesn't contradict itself. So I don't really think that this idea that they just naturally live with contradiction, that that's somehow unique to the East, I'm not getting that.
Speaker 13I don't think the historical record supports it, but perhaps it does in some way that I don't understand.
Speaker 5We'll have to just agree to disagree on that one, or at least continue the conversation more later.
Speaker 13Quite interesting, my friend.
Ian MalcolmYeah, well, let's go to Carmine and see if he has a question for JFG.
Ian MalcolmAnd if not, we will... Bring in the riot who was up here a second ago and then dropped down. Riot, is it working for you?
Speaker 16Riot?
Ian MalcolmIt will not be a riot. There's no riot.
Speaker 13No dancing.
Ian MalcolmNo rioting. Okay. Wow. This is very curious. So now we will go. I'm sorry, Carmine. Well, actually, you're requesting again. We'll see if this will work.
Ian MalcolmAll right, let's give Carmine one more chance.
Ian MalcolmThere you go.
Speaker 17I've spoken to many people about this app. I'm sorry to digress a bit from the topic, but I'm hoping that others are sharing your experiences on this app. Not really working all that consistently. Anyhow, it sounds like you're debating, I mean, how fundamental does it get? The ontological question, who am I? Why am I here?
Speaker 17What's my purpose? And we're all supposed to ask that question, I would imagine. How does that get addressed collectively? Does it? Can it? Because on the JQ, just yesterday, in fact, I'm still looking for a straight answer from anybody, Jew or Gentile. which absolutely definitively defines exactly what is a Jew. And I'm telling you, I've had about as many answers as there are, well, Jews.
Speaker 17So as it stands, the latest that I've heard is, it all depends on whether your mother's a Jew. If your mother's not a Jew, then you have to convert. And you know, those two things seem to be mutually exclusive definitions, right? If it's by birth, then how can you possibly convert So anyhow, I just wanted to get that out there for anyone who wants to weigh in.
Speaker 17It might not be directly related to what our guest was talking about, but please, can anyone just sort of add some clarity to that? Thank you.
Speaker 2Well, the way I approach it is we shouldn't annoy ourselves too much with religion or matri-linearity. We should only care about what matters, which is it's a group that is loose at the border that sometimes reproduce with non-Jews. like Jared Kushner and, uh, uh, with, uh, with Trump's daughter. And we just have to say that there are loose genetic groups in humanity and Jews are one of them.
Speaker 2And there are many subdivisions and they're just a genetic nucleus with some degree of diversity, some degree of interface with other people, just like races, subspecies species. They all interfere and embed into one another. at very unclear sometimes borders, but the Jews are definitely clear enough that they are distinguishable on the genetic test.
Speaker 2And that's what we should care about. And on top of it, socially, they appear to be coordinating in their own interest.
Speaker 17So if I may clarify, thanks for answering. So you yourself then are saying that they're genetically defined. It's not a matter of their, what's the word? observing the uh decalogue they call the ten commandments so you're saying are you okay are you saying it's genetic are you it's just a minute my friend please are you yourself vouching that it's a genetic definition or are you echoing what they say are you yourself a jew i don't know much about you i'm not jewish i've tested 100 percent white european by 23 and me and uh yeah so my my point to you is religion does not matter too much here
Speaker 2because many of them abandoned their religious belief. And the social phenomenon that we're interested in is largely operated by secular Jews, or Jews that have disconnected from a traditional strict practice of Judaism.
Speaker 17Okay, so now, so a secular Jew, that's not a genetic definition, is it?
Speaker 2Well, yes, it's a genetic definition to me. What I say is what matters is ultimately we're talking about... an ensemble of a nucleus of genetics.
Speaker 17Okay, so this is interesting. You sound like you have a French or Belgian accent. I don't know.
Speaker 2I have a Quebec accent. I'm sorry, what's it called? Quebec, Canada.
Speaker 17Ah, you're Quebecois? Yes. I'm in Ontario. Greetings, fellow Canuck. I didn't know. I'm sorry. Again, I don't know much about you. Anyway, thanks for answering the question. But at the same time, I'm hearing... know again you say you're you're a gentile or not a jew but at the same time you are answering implicitly that the definition is indeed genetic right governed by haplotype is that the idea well it is to me
Speaker 2It is to me because that's what I'm interested in as a biologist. Someone might identify differently.
Speaker 17I would like to hear from a Jew. Is any Jew willing to make the definition one or the other? Because you see, this whole conversion thing is the problem, you see. Because I don't think the conversions make any sense if we're saying it's genetic. Now, you're saying it's genetic. Does anyone in this space know what the Jew actually says?
Speaker 17Or is there a Jew in this space that can actually definitively explain it? And how is it possible to convert oneself if it's genetic?
Speaker 18I'll just speak for them. The answer is, it depends. How's that?
Speaker 17It depends. Those are the things that old people wear. Elderly people wear those things called the pens when they're incontinent.
Speaker 13It depends on whether it's okay if we bond the people in Gaza. It depends on whether we're beginning yelled at too much.
Speaker 17I get it. Oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 13It's a matter of convenience. We're white people. We're not white people. You know, we're just shapeshifters. Whatever it is.
Ian MalcolmMarx is a Jew when Marxism is revered and when it's inconvenient and bad, all of a sudden he's not a Jew because he converted.
Speaker 17Thank you. I was waiting to see how long it would take to get a thank you. It's been an honor and a pleasure being in this space. Thank you for your time.
@yoteofstreetDon't forget Genesis 10.3 where Ashkenaz was a son of... Gomer, which was the son of Japis.
Ian MalcolmAnd for what it's worth, that definition I tried to give is not based on any kind of prejudice. Rather, it's just the direct rantings of Mitch F., who some of you might know on this platform, who's convinced that Marx is not a Jew, but to be a Jew is to be the son or daughter of a Jewish woman, which Marx was. And so it can be both things at the same time.
Ian MalcolmIt's all very, very, very confusing. Speaking of Marx, I just set up a space with Canary Mine for anybody familiar. That'll be next week. And she will be talking about the curious intermarriage between Marx and of all people, the Rothschilds. Wow, isn't that something I'd heard about in the past, but gonna dive into the exact ways in which that took place.
Ian MalcolmSo who was it that was funding all of that intellectual nonsense? What do you know? It's the same usual suspects, but great. Great set of questions there, Carmine. Let's go to Andy.
Speaker 7Exactly. I mean, you've all seen the clip where Charlie Kirk said, secular Jews have a lot of explaining to do. They're the number one funders of open borders, Marxist policies. And I mean, yeah, we see it with exactly what you said with Marx and just someone like the Rothschilds, Soros, et cetera. And that is much more of...
Speaker 7these billionaires like that is much more of a threat than obviously just the just the regular jew that goes to church and whatever like that's what people need to realize that it's the it's the man behind the curtain so to speak and that's what and that's what republicans need to realize when they're calling out soros like when they're mad at mamdani oh my god oh my god
Speaker 7He's this communist Muslim. Why can't they call Soros a communist Jew? It's that mental block because they've been so brainwashed that, oh my God, you can't call someone what they actually are.
Speaker 13Do you think Soros is a communist?
Speaker 7Well, he's not actually a communist, but the policies that he pushes, he pushes some of that stuff or funds some of those groups. He's not actually one himself. Right.
Speaker 13So why do you think that is, though? Why would someone...
Speaker 7He uses that because they use the left as useful idiots to then try to seize power and then install an authoritarian system. Because the communism sounds good to a lot of voters. And because, again, with the economy being so bad, they want to crash the economy and then allow that to vote in their new world order. And a lot of people are going to vote for it because when the average first-time homebuyer
Speaker 7is 40 people aren't getting married people aren't having kids and people are hopeless they're going to vote for free stuff because free stuff sounds good but no one ever actually gets free stuff you get poverty and authoritarian control source of course is not a communism because communism would mean that they get their wealth stripped from them but right and i would say this let's not forget that in a world where everything is free you're not
Speaker 13Right? Because wealth is the product of human effort and ingenuity. So if that's the only place you can get it, then the only way that everything could be as free is if you're enslaved, right?
Speaker 7Exactly. Exactly. It's the greatest scam. It's never worked. There's not been one time where communism has worked.
Speaker 13Well, I mean, civilization, for the most part, was collectivist, you know, throughout the history. Well, human society, for the most part, was collectivist. The statist version of communism, such as was presented to us with Marxism, no, of course, and why doesn't it work? Because the audacity of a small group of people to make decisions for everybody else is not only ridiculous, but it's just unworkable.
Speaker 7Exactly, collectivism in the form of, hey, going back to family farms instead of big corporate farms poisoning our food, absolutely, that makes sense. But collectivism of, oh, the government owns everything, absolutely not.
Speaker 13Right. Well, and what is the government? But a small group of people at a specific time and geography that assume the non-existent right to make everybody else obey and pay them in the threat of murder and engagement. Exactly.
Speaker 7We have unalienable rights endowed by our creator.
Speaker 13Right, right. And here's the important thing about, you know, the communist civilization that they want to force upon him. The primary unit of civilization, morally speaking, is the individual, right? So if the standard of your good is the individual, then it can never be sacrificed on behalf of something greater, something else.
Speaker 13But no, no, no. These virulently collectivist societies are predicated upon the idea that the primary unit of civilization is the group, which not only automatically invites but insists upon the individual as a sacrificial animal. You have basically... deprive the individual of their means of defense against the brutality, the totalitarianism of the political state, because every time he raises his voice against it, then the charge back is that you have committed the original sin against communism, which is pursuing your self-interest.
Speaker 13And our civilization, American civilizations, specifically wrote in one of its founding documents, the pursuit of happiness for a reason. And the people who deign to rule us and reduce us to servitude absolutely hate that phrase. They hate the idea that the individual should live as a non-sacrificial being, that they should wake up in the morning completely owning themselves, and they should declare to all of the tyrannical powers of the world, you do not have a right to one moment of my time or effort on earth.
Speaker 13So I would do it if I were George Soros. I would use the language of communism in order to gain control over everyone. But just as you said, I would never actually realize that because then they would come take my stuff. And gosh, I wouldn't want them to do that.
Speaker 17David, if I may, pardon the interruption. You mentioned something about the pursuit of happiness. Now, correct me if I'm mistaken. Were they not inspired, the writers of that? pursuit of happiness, were they not inspired by what John Locke had written? And didn't John Locke say life, liberty, and property rather than life, liberty, and the pursuit?
Speaker 13He did. I think it was Benjamin Franklin who encouraged the greatest genius in the history of American politics. Sorry, Trump, you're an idiot, is obviously Thomas Jefferson. And he was a philosopher. He was an actual philosopher. What about Thomas Paine? What about Thomas Paine? No, I like Thomas Paine, but he just wasn't a deep thinker.
Speaker 13No, not even.
Speaker 17Oh, please continue.
Speaker 13No, I do. My favorite thing that he said, if you read the beginning of his work Common Sense, he says, government at best is a necessary evil that worsens an intolerable one. I agree, except for the necessary part. But Dr. Jefferson, he was well aware of the property thing, and it was Benjamin Franklin that wanted to mollify that and change it to the pursuit of happiness.
Speaker 13But I really like that, you know, because... Jefferson was an Aristotelian, and Aristotle was a eudaimonianist, which is he believed that the highest ethical value was pursuing happiness or happiness, that this was the yardstick by which every human being should be measured. And I don't mean pleasure, by the way. I'm talking about ataraxia, happiness, inner peace.
Speaker 13So Jefferson was naturally inspired by that. So for... For Benjamin Franklin to come in and make that change, I think, was naturally okay with Jefferson for that reason.
Speaker 17Sorry, eudaimonia, that literally means good demon. Well, that's not actually what... No, I'm saying literally, etymologically, you meaning good, and daimonia... Yeah, when people do that, well, it's the spirit.
Speaker 13Like if you read De Adima by Aristotle, which is on the nature of the soul, he's kind of talking about the same thing. And ultimately what they're talking about is that state of inner peace or equanimity.
Speaker 17So that's an ancient thing. Even the Indians spoke of equanimity. Yeah, sattva, I think they call that.
Speaker 13Yeah, they do.
Speaker 17Interesting. Thank you very much for that.
Ian MalcolmYeah, well, let's go see if longevity, it's been a long time, see if longevity is there with us. And if not, we'll go to Itzhak 13.
Speaker 13The longevity still has longevity.
Ian MalcolmWe'll just leave it going. Perhaps at some point before we wind down the space, not too long from now, maybe we'll get something. Let's go to Itzhak13.
Speaker 19I want to talk, but later. I'm just noting something, so may I have time, please?
Ian MalcolmSure. It's a confusing response, but okay, absolutely.
Speaker 2In any case, Jan, I have to go very soon. So if there's any last questions, it would be time to do it.
Ian MalcolmYeah, it's Zach. This is your big shot.
Ian MalcolmNope. Going once, going twice, going 13 times.
Speaker 13We need Jeopardy music.
Ian MalcolmI don't count down in my head. All right. We will please continue and, uh, we'll move you from speaker there. That was kind of strange. Uh, let's get a Carmine who has his hand up and, uh, then we'll get some parting words from Mr. JFG.
Speaker 17Thank you again, Ian. Um, if I may, I'd like to talk a little bit about the, the hot event, you know, Mr. Trump's, uh, umpteenth attempt. What's, what's the count now? Roughly. Anyone have a, anyone have a three, three. Oh, I think it's more than that, but either way, what's important is, uh, I'm detecting a pattern here.
Speaker 17And the pattern seems to be a closer and closer attempt. And I'm sensing that perhaps someday soon they're going to make a successful attempt. Of course, when I say successful, I use that word in air quotes because I think they have some spectacular miracle in the waiting. Just remember, seeing is not believing, right?
Speaker 17Especially in this day and age of deep fakes, AI. clones and body doubles and you know what i mean so i hear that obama recently piped up about what happened to and i was only talking recently to some people about his conspicuous silence lately and every once in a while he pipes up well he's piped up again so now he's probably going to slowly make his way back onto the stage.
Speaker 17This is my speculation, thinking out loud. Anyhow, I just wanted to get that out there. Oh, one last thing. David Suzuki here in Canada, highly revered man, has his 90th birthday coming up. I think it's May 22nd. And I saw him this morning on a CP24 Everywhere. Mark Daly and who else passed away. Either way, he's celebrating his 90th birthday, May 22nd, and he's invited some dignitaries.
Speaker 17He name-dropped Al Gore. I'm thinking, wow. This is incredible. I wonder who else is going to be showing up for this big birthday bash. Anyhow, thank you very much, Ian. It's been a pleasure and thanks for giving me the microphone and keep the spaces going. Thank you.
Speaker 9And Ian, if it's okay with you, I would like to say one more thing to Jean if it's okay with him as well.
Speaker 2Yeah, go ahead.
Speaker 9But first of all, Ian, about the video games and shooters or fine motor, whatever it was, obviously there's focus ability involved there. you know, when you're playing first-person shooters and shit like that. So there's definitely, like, some, you know, PFC activity happening with those types of games. And I wanted to say more to Dancing, but she's gone.
Speaker 9But, Jean, earlier you mentioned how religion, even though you don't believe in it, and I'm the same, I'm agnostic, I do lean towards believing in God, though, as, like, a creator God. But about religion, saying that it's kind of useful and morality and stuff... I want to see what you think of this. I've broken it down to three things, and this is why it's not going away.
Speaker 9The first part is the moral system, like the laws that you're supposed to follow. And then there's explanation, so origin of life and what happens after death, so everyone has their own explanation. And then the third is the community that forms around those two things. And because there is an explanation for the universe and there seems to be a moral reality,
Speaker 9Religion is not going to go away, but we might find a more objective scientific explanation for what those two things are. But as it stands, we don't have an answer. And some people can't live in that uncertainty and some can. And that's the nature of the situation, I think.
Speaker 2Well, that's a psychological view of why religion exists. I have a biological view. Religion will keep existing because it leads people to make babies. Period.
Speaker 9Really, you think it's that simple?
Speaker 2That simple. And in fact, that's the answer to every single thing that you are, that I am.
Speaker 13Wait, don't atheists have sex?
Speaker 17That's your answer.
Speaker 13Wait, of course that's his answer. Whose answer did you think it would be? Don't you think that atheists have sex, my friend?
Speaker 2They have less reproductive sex. Oh, I see. So the breeding rate is at 1.6, approximately 1.6 for atheists, and it's at 2.2 for Christians, conservatives in the US.
Speaker 9Let me challenge you really quick on that, Jean, if that's okay. So you're saying that religious people have more sex and more babies, and that could be a correlation, not necessarily a causation, where you get relief from having an explanation and perceived... uh like moral rules so you feel reassured because there's less uncertainty therefore you're more likely to breathe that could be like a correlation there but regardless i want to say that i think religion is an emergent phenomena that comes from behavior selection because you think about what religion is at its core is do good things and don't do bad things and that means that you can select behaviors and don't select the bad ones and select the good ones and i think it's that is why it's there it's kind of like a consequence of our pfc
Speaker 9which allows us to select behaviors. Once you can select behaviors, you can't rely on impulses because my behaviors are telling me rape people and eat everything and steal and blah, blah, blah. And those can't be going off of a feeling-based thing. So you have to follow principles. And I think it's like an emergent phenomenon.
Speaker 9What do you think about that?
Speaker 2Well, correlation or causation barely matters in evolution because it doesn't matter what leads Christians to make more babies. If they make more babies in 400 years from now, they have more people than the atheists. So right now, if you take an Excel sheet and you calculate the birth rate of atheists and the birth rate of Christians, you will find that within 400 years, basically, atheists are headed toward full extinction.
Speaker 2Now, it's not going to stay at that rate.
Speaker 20Well, then why would there be more atheists today, my friend? Then why would there be more atheists today than there were 500 years ago?
Speaker 2Well, I was about to say, so... it's not necessarily going to be stable. And the current numbers don't have to be stable. You will have resurgence of atheists having babies a little more than the atheists of today. But ultimately, if you can't sustain over long periods of time, your reproductive rate of above 2.1. Now the question to why are there atheists?
Speaker 2Why are there gays? For example, same thing. Why are there any life forms that seem to be bound for non-success and yet they survive, it's because the world is changing. So basically the gays of today are gay because of genes that weren't making you gay a thousand years ago. They make you gay in 2026. Now. What's the gene that makes an atheist?
Speaker 2Probably genes of contrarianism, probably genes of lack of submission to authority.
Speaker 17Wow. This is amazing. Have you written a book on this, sir? No.
@yoteofstreetI would throw in one thing. I think that when it comes to faith and whatnot, if you don't have faith, it's actually impossible. I guess you go to the religious argument or whatever, but if one does not have faith, you cannot have that kind of spirituality thing, if that makes any sense right there.
Speaker 13Well, the idea of describing the rational method and the rise of rationality and the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the idea of describing that to some errant gene, I'm sorry, but that just is unsupported by reality.
Speaker 2There's plenty of evidence that psychological variables, including political and philosophical preference, are caused by genes. Okay, so if you're standing over the shoulder...
Speaker 13So if you're standing over Isaac Newton's shoulder and he's writing the Principia, what gene is involved? What variant of the gene is involved in him dividing the laws of motion? Help me out with that one.
Speaker 2Well, first of all, would you acknowledge that we may not know which gene it is, but understand that genes are part of the causal route?
Speaker 13Well, but he who posits must defend. And if you are saying there's a particular gene that's making this happen... I haven't said a particular. Well, it has to be, right? If you're going to say it's a general one...
Speaker 2But I don't have to know which gene it is to know that it's genes. I know that it's genes because Isaac Newton wasn't a squirrel. And he didn't have squirrel DNA. He had human DNA. And it was the DNA that was present in the Europeans. And if he had been a South African at that time, he wouldn't have come up with the Principia.
Speaker 13Okay, so we do agree that there is a relationship between genetics and intelligence. I certainly understand this concept, right? But the idea, for instance, that people would arrive at different points of view on religiosity through rational means, rather than it being some errant gene that would make them homosexuals, the idea that it's something deviant, I'm sorry, but it's just unsupported, even philosophically.
Speaker 13I would say it's not just... The scientific method doesn't even apply here. The rational method doesn't even work on that one. It could be. The reason why Immanuel Kant and all the philosophers in the Enlightenment were thinking deeply about this is because they understood that when people examine these things very, very deeply, the ideas themselves change.
Speaker 13And this began with St. Augustine, by the way. If you read, for instance, his Confessions or City of God, which are both masterpieces, the more he considers these things, especially through the Olympic of Neoplatonism, the more his opinions change about these things. And we even know this with the Prince of the Humanist in the 16th century, Erasmus.
Speaker 13When he really starts thinking deeply about what his beliefs are, then they change. So the evolution of ideas is there's a Hegelian quality to this. It's not because they have some sort of aberrant... a gene like homosexuality that's pushing them in this so-called wrong direction. What do you think about that?
Speaker 2I will leave you all on this thought, and this will be the last thing I say tonight because I do have to go. Your elbow can change angle throughout your life. Sometimes it's folded, sometimes it's extended. Your elbow changes all the time, and yet your elbow is caused by your genes, and the capacity of it to change is all caused by genes.
Speaker 2Bye-bye, guys, and thanks for having me.
Ian MalcolmI like the literal mic drop.
Speaker 17That was wonderful. The elbow. It's about the elbow. Wow. That's really extraordinary. Thank you so much.
Speaker 9I think we just discovered the elbow fallacy.
Speaker 17I'm sorry, Ian. I don't have much truck in what this man peddles. Thank you, Ian, for the opportunity to speak and ask questions.
Speaker 9No, no. He's a great man. You don't have to diss him. He's fine.
Speaker 17Well, I'm not dissing. I'm not even thinking about the man. I'm just thinking about the words and the ideas. Oh, one last thing. Someone earlier mentioned Jews going to church. I want to remind everybody, Jews don't go to church. They don't have a church. Don't be deceived by Anton LaVey's Church of Satan. No, no. You see, in calling it a church, a church of Satan, you see, you've got to forget it's the synagogue of Satan.
Speaker 17See, he's got a synagogue. He doesn't have a church. Calling it a church is a decoy, or sorry, a scarecrow, a smokescreen. It's a synagogue, not a church. Thank you very much.
@joann_marieThank you so much, Carmen. Coyote, go for it.
@yoteofstreetI just want to come up here. I've been tracking down Ian, testing his diligence, kind of this little Alice thing that they got out. I can kind of give a reminder to your audience, man. Y'all be sure y'all set your notifications for them, man. They really are dinging this guy. And I can tell from his space numbers and whatnot.
@yoteofstreetSo set your notifications and support people that get up here and talk about these things and get beat the fuck up as they do it. That's the thing, too. You really do. You get attacked all day and called shit. And it gets kind of old because then your own people, they can't even nod their head at you whenever they see you in the street.
@yoteofstreetThey were talking about the George Soros earlier. And that's the, you know, this shit, it drives me crazy sometimes with it. I think he's 94. He's not going to prison. I don't think he ever is. It's like kind of shows that both sides of each argument kind of thing. And I still don't understand how like society is where it is.
@yoteofstreetBut I stepped into a kind of a conservative, you know, some conservatives talking today about. a lot of the things going on and deportations and whatnot, I think we're going to have to get real about what is what and just like, you know, point it out. And it's going to be uncomfortable for a lot of people because you're going to like the silence is going to have to break or whatever, because we really need it.
@yoteofstreetThis, this world, like this country is a, it's, it's getting rapid. A lot of the things that, that, that happened, which is historical. But there's, you know, like yesterday, what was it? The Google trends? Like, good God, I posted that shit. I've never. I've never seen anything like that, but your voice is needed. And if you got some information that you want to ask, I suggest come up and ask.
@yoteofstreetBecause voices are needed and people need to like get real with things. And we got to understand that it's going to take a lot of arguing with each other and with other people about a bunch of controversial things to fix where we need to go because things are broken and they're not going to fix themselves. But I think that there's like a few people like, you know, you, David, John, y'all been getting up here a long time.
@yoteofstreetAnd it's like, it gets like, all right, three, that's three people, you know, very consistent, right? But when that, you know, a lot of the people get burnout. Luckily, these individuals right here don't get burnout or whatever, but a lot of people do, and that leads to this demoralization that they are pure as shit banking on because they are pushing it out there.
@yoteofstreetOtherwise, you wouldn't have Trump out there, you know, going and reading 2 Chronicles, the favorite evangelical type of, you know, get all hyped up and, yeah, it's coming, man, pre-rapture. They just, you know, came out with 1,800 years after Christianity had been out there. which I just don't understand. It's kind of sick actually what they did there, but that's a problem.
@yoteofstreetIt's good to see Gen Z. They give me a lot of hope. I actually, I went to a Bible study the other Sunday and I heard one just like speak out. He was like, man, that's kind of a weird crowd right there. I was like, oh my God, where are you at, dude? You need to come up with us. I think honestly, we're going to have to end up kind of reaching out to them because a lot of people in our generation and
@yoteofstreetKeep in mind, people, that 1980 through 1985, those are core numbers right there. Those are kind of the people that we're going to have to be the bridge in explaining some of the things to the boomers from the Gen Z. And it's a lot of work coming up ahead, but we got it. We're going to win. That's what David and you always say, man, and we're going to do this.
@yoteofstreetAnd I've got to say it, man, dispensationalism and Christian Zionism. Okay, Christian Zionism first. By definition, not America first. You can't say it. you know, spread that out there. There's no argument. You can't argue that. You can't even argue about the, you know, if you got like the theology aspect of it, Joshua 21, 45, there's verses that counter these things or whatever.
@yoteofstreetAnd, you know, be sure and show that to people because you don't want them going to hell. Anyway, I appreciate you.
Ian MalcolmNo, and, you know, a quick little addition on that. And then what I'd love to do is to go to David and I'll tee him up. for some parting words on this subject, because I think nobody will be able to give us a better send off in this idea of the devolution that they wish for us to go down this path, right? Via enslavement of the mind, the body, the soul, the fattening up of our physique, so that we're basically just incapable of recognizing that we are enslaved.
Ian MalcolmAnd even if we were, that we're financially and physically inept to do anything about it. I think that's where the usual suspects, the Jews are trying to take us and no, it's not every Jew, but the people at the top of almost all of these AI companies, the tech companies, the social media companies, the Hollywood companies, they're almost all Jewish.
Ian MalcolmAnd that's a reasonable thing to suggest. And that is why I am going to stand up with anyone and everyone that will stand against this machine. regardless of your color, your creed, your sexuality, any of those things. If you're willing to say, this is bad, supremacy is bad, we need to do away with it, then I will stand in opposition with you against that machine, right?
Ian MalcolmAnd then in a future state, we can then decide what type of morals, what type of ethics, what type of, let's say, racial demographics we wish to be a part of. And I mention this because, curiously, in the Purple Pill, Somebody decided to suggest, let me make sure I give the exact verbatim response. I don't want to misrepresent anybody.
Ian MalcolmThat would be mean of me, right? But this individual was going through, oh, here we go. All right. And the suggestion, now this is perfect. The suggestion was from Hakiti. Said I used to respect Ian Malcolm, but then he turned out to be just another white supremacist who would prefer to have a white, and I'll just replace the word here, sexual predator as his neighbor than a decent non-white person is the claim that was made.
Ian MalcolmWhat? Now, here's the funny part.
Speaker 20Ian, how dare you?
Ian MalcolmI know, right? Now, here's the funny part. Two things. Number one, I think it's a very funny suggestion because, well... To Coyote's comment, I get called everything. I've been called the neo-Nazi, who's also called the brown guy, who's also called the Chinese guy, who's also called the Canadian guy, who's also called, insert thing here.
Ian MalcolmAnd the best part is I don't care about any of it. And I say this because the burnout that is possible in trying to have honest dialogue about Jewish supremacy, it's enough to just have to deal with dishonest Jews. I don't mean to pick on the Jews because it's also the people that are suckered by the slop and that still believe the narrative.
Ian MalcolmBut it's primarily really obnoxious Jews that I've had to deal with the gaslighting from who will say things like Karl Marx wasn't Jewish and all the other nonsense. That is frustrating. But you know what's far more frustrating is dealing with absolute idiots. that are supposed to be on team anti-Jewish supremacy who just want to start fights with us regardless over anything and everything.
Ian MalcolmNow, here's why this is perfect. Because two coyotes comment about burnout. You know how I avoid that? And I recommend that all of you do the exact same. Just mute those accounts. Mute the idiots. You're not going to win them over. They are not going to see the light. The person that wants to say that I would prefer to live next to the white sexual predator than anybody else.
Ian MalcolmIt's utterly insane. But people will say that. And then in the very next space that I host, someone will say that I am a race traitor because I hang out with dons. That'll be the suggestion. 24 hours later, folks, mute these people. Don't worry about it. Be totally indifferent to idiots. And when you do that, you can then have the energy and the time to instead have productive conversations with productive people that might have disagreements amongst one another.
Ian MalcolmWe saw that up here on this very space. How did the world come about? Well, difference is there. Why are we different? Difference is there. How do genetics play? How do epigenetics play? And Amaru might have a totally different view from Jean-Francois, who might have a totally different view from Hitchlap, who I see in the listener's comment and who I have a great amount of respect for.
Ian MalcolmThat's wonderful because in those differences of opinions, we sharpen the swords that Christ would have suggested that we sell the cloak to buy and that we sharpen them, that we sharpen our mind, we sharpen our body, sharpen your physique, sharpen your understanding of history. And then in doing so, we'll be able to tackle the problem that is Jewish supremacy, but we won't be able to tackle it.
Ian MalcolmWe won't have the energy to do it if you deal with the ankle biters. So do not, don't spend any time, effort, energy, anything. Mute them. You can block them if you want, but then they're going to say, oh, I won the argument. I've seen that one too many times. So instead, I just block these fools. I recommend you all do exactly the same.
Ian MalcolmBecause a lot of them, oh, by the way, are probably 8,200 trolls. Their sole purpose is to gaslight you into leaving the app. That's the only reason that they're there. So ignore all of them. Just keep speaking the truth and try to speak with people that you think are interesting, that are valuable, that will leave you with something you did not have prior.
Ian MalcolmThat might be information. It might be a smile. It might be an uplifting sentiment, right? Take all of those things. There's way too many black pills. Find the white pills. And Mr. Jean-Francois, you brought a lot of them. I am so glad that you came here. I know that you've left, but I want to thank you for being here.
Ian MalcolmI want to thank you for taking the time. Truly wild. I mean, to get to speak to somebody that not only has absolute expertise on this subject matter, but that also has personal experiences via encounters with Jeffrey Epstein was able to give us insight, not only into the direct funding and how that was taking place, but also the indirect
Ian MalcolmSeeding is probably the right word of people into positions of power that the Epstein network were doing behind the scenes to lift up those people that were pursuing their ideas and interests. Very interesting way to hear directly about the indirect way in which Jewish supremacy is basically controlling everything and is sitting behind the scenes and was trying to put JFG into a prominent position of power.
Ian MalcolmBecause they knew he was doing things that they found beneficial. That's how this system works. They control everything, folks. They own it all. But the good news is that we are going to win. We're going to keep exposing it. And as we do, we're going to bring more attention to the problem, which will be get them and their combating anti-Semitism czar to do even more asinine things.
Ian MalcolmAnd then that just further proves our point. It's getting to the point where even the most adherent individual who is just sucking at the teat of the mainstream narrative. Even they are getting a little bit suspicious about what's going on. So keep doing what we're doing every single day. We will keep winning. And before I give any little final remarks and our goodbyes, I see that Donna has her hand up.
Ian MalcolmLet's go to Donna. Then we're going to go to David for those kind of a thing of it as an intellectual prayer. And then we'll send everybody on their way over to Mr. Truthteller's space, which I believe is going to be opening up here momentarily.
Speaker 21Thank you, Ian. I know this isn't about evolution or anything, but it's like a part of how do we win. I argue with AI a lot, not about things I don't know, but about things I do know. And I've come to a conclusion that Larry Fink isn't rich. BlackRock isn't rich. It is our money.
Speaker 21decide where it's going to be put. And it manipulates our world, whether it's the way they produce our food with poisons in it, or whether they take our factories and move them over to another country because they get cheaper labor. And so I thought the best thing that we can do is have, I don't know if we have to get legislation for this,
Speaker 21but create dedicated retirement accounts that the money that the employer matches you know that you towards your 401k actually gets direct deposited into this designated retirement account and it could be in a credit union and that way it stays here it stays in our community it helps our neighbors and it gets out of BlackRock's hands.
Speaker 21And so anybody have anything they think that this is like, I mean, this like really boils down to it. They're wielding our money against us.
Ian MalcolmNo, that's exactly correct. I'm sorry.
Speaker 21No, I just wondered if anybody had anything, you know, that they... wanted to say i mean i come to these conclusions after you know wait you're telling me that the powers of evil control our financial systems i'm let me jot this down david it's it's i'm not trying i'm i'm trying to say i'm just kidding that we can this is our money we need to take it back and this is literally well saying that everything isn't isn't rich is like saying the slave master doesn't have a big house right so
Speaker 13obviously we're not talking just about looting. We're talking about slavery, right? So the battle in the world, you've heard me say before, is not as Karl Marx depicted it, which is defined by a struggle between classes, but by a struggle between those who wish to enslave and those who wish to be free. And how are they doing it?
Speaker 13But by controlling our political system. So that's how you do it. Because the state, the political state, has a monopoly on violence. And in order to enslave people, you need to threaten them with violence. And that's basically how it all works. So they wouldn't be able to control the financial systems and by extension tell you what to do and with whom to associate and whether you can talk or not, what you're allowed to say, what you're allowed to think, and how to raise your kids if they didn't control all of these things.
Speaker 13So I grant your point, but the locus of the problem really is control of the political state and not merely control of a pension fund.
Speaker 21Well, they won't have so much money to throw for lobbyists if we're controlling our own money.
@yoteofstreetIf you look at the history, though, like the history of this thing, I mean, it's a repeating pattern. Like, it really, really is. It may be in a different kind of sense or whatever, but look at the Weimar. It's like they were even kind of calling it like the do something or whatever, bro. It's like these things happen.
@yoteofstreetThey happen in different forms, but it kind of – that's the thing about, like, organic. It's a great word. Like, you know, it's like if I give Ian a look – And Ian knows like what I'm saying. It's like, you know, I don't have to say like, hey, I'm going forward or whatever. Sometimes you could just things just kind of occur naturally.
@yoteofstreetWe we strategize too much on a lot of things, you know, and it's just look into the history. I would I would I would really recommend that. It's a long history and it's very, very repetitive.
Speaker 21Think about the fact that when they are trying to control us, they sell it to us on safety. What did they do with 401ks? Oh, we're going to help you save for retirement. We'll match every dollar you put in. And then in turn, they're controlling the dollars we put in. So it's actually the flip.
@yoteofstreetWould you say, though, that at first we have to all kind of get in sync? You know, I'm saying like that's the big thing. We are our own worst enemy. And that's why I always talk about like the people. you know, to get that uncomfortable voice so that they can grow. We have to, you know, four people aren't going to, nothing's going to, you know, it's not going to happen like that.
@yoteofstreetAnd Ian, you are right. There's definitely a shift. It's like, it makes me think of what Charlie Kirk said, that there's like an earthquake, just a brewing, dude. You can just kind of, kind of feel it. It's natural. You can't give a kid, one kid, two pieces of candy, and then the other kid doesn't get shit. He gets taxed more.
@yoteofstreetIt's just, it just, it gets like that. But it's a... You know, we really, really, really got to kind of get in sync. I would focus more on, you know, just trying to do what we do, man, because it's got to happen, man. It's just nonsense.
Speaker 21Just think about it. If you just take 150 million people in the United States and they pull their money out of the 401ks, how much money is that coming out of BlackRock's ass?
Speaker 9And one thing I want to add, by the way, think about how crazy this is that Iran is making Lego videos telling us we like the American people, but you got to do something about these goddamn Jews. I mean, we're bombing the shit out of these people and they're like, it's the Jews. I mean, it's fucking wild, the situation that we're in.
Speaker 9And I have to just wear a shirt that says it's the Jews and just walk around. But I don't have enough money. Once I get enough capital, then I'll be able to do something like that.
Ian MalcolmSo here's the move. Instead of leaflets and pamphlets, which I know some people have handed out and Chris Woods heroically did. Amiru, what I'm hearing from you is that we should get a fund. We will go and hire a t-shirt company. We'll try to produce as many of them in bulk as possible. So if anybody wants to donate roughly a half million dollars to the It's the Jew t-shirt fund, we'll have to figure, maybe we can work with Harrison Smith or something over at, or what was InfoWars, figure out how to get them to produce a half million of those shirts and then strategically position them in boxes all across the country.
Ian MalcolmWe'll just hand them out. Imagine if every homeless person across this beautiful country just had a shirt on that said, it's the Jews, idiot. It would be a very interesting campaign. But look, the awareness is happening. As that awareness happens, we've got to be very careful, right? Because we know absolutely that this machine is going to use false flags, that they will try to use any and every aggression as an angle to suggest that people are radical.
Ian MalcolmSo we always need to continuously push. against that. Instead, it should be calm, it should be intellectual, and it should be, again, from a position of loving and protecting the things that we care about, not hating necessarily anybody. It's not a very attractive emotion. And so, David, as kind of a round out, I'd be curious, you always do such a wonderful job kind of giving some positive words as we kind of head off out of this, the sermons that are these spaces, maybe the gospels, the good news, right, if you will.
Ian MalcolmCan you give us some on this idea of the devolution of where things go and of how we do our best to just serve as a bulwark against it?
Speaker 13Or the evolution, I would say, yeah. I would say, well, first of all, I'm still kind of pondering this idea that you said, was it Jesus who said, sell your cloak and buy a sword? Oh, and a sword and a shield.
Ian MalcolmYeah, Jesus Christ.
Speaker 13Okay, because if I sold my cloak and bought a sword, then you'd see two swords, and I'm not even going to tell you which one would be bigger. Anyway, I just thought this was an interesting idea. I'm just standing there naked. But no, well, look, I think political states devolve and civilization evolves. And the big change, whenever you have an epoch change in civilization, it's the philosophical ideas that had momentum going into it that arise out of it.
Speaker 13And what are those ideas? What are we pursuing here? Emancipation. And by the way, I don't, Emeru, I would not say it's the Jews. I would say it's Jewish supremacy because I have Jewish brothers and sisters that agree with me, that agree with you, that agree with us. And I'm always inviting everybody because I believe everybody has the divine spark within them to join us in our journey towards the emancipation, which will surely come.
Speaker 13Why will that come? Because in the long stretch of time, the truth wins out. It certainly does. I'm sorry, but it does. I would hate to be on the side of the lie. A profound study of history betrays this obviousity. The truth wins out. And of course, as you heard me say many times before, part of it is because the truth spoken but once can shatter a lie spoken a thousand times.
Speaker 13And that is why... that we're fighting against censorship. That is why we're fighting against authoritarianism. That is why we're fighting against indoctrination. That is why we're fighting against intimidation and threats on all of the myriad ways. You know, when Voltaire said that the pen is mightier than the sword, well, by extension, he's saying the speeches.
Speaker 13Voltaire would certainly have a space on X today. I mean, just imagine, because... We all know that there is nothing inspiring about the other side. No one cares. No one is listening. I don't need the rage bait. You're right, Ian, about muting people. You're right. Because what are they saying? What is it always? Your mind doesn't work.
Speaker 13You're a bad person if you don't agree with us. Submit or die. And this is the choice that every authoritarian moment in civilization has given its citizenry, has given its serfs. Submit or die. And our forefathers brought forth a new nation on the principle of saying to those people, in the words of John F. Kennedy, take two running jumps and go to hell.
Speaker 13We're going to win whenever people that love their freedom, the dignity and the majesty and the poetry of freedom, whenever they love this, they always win. You have to be convinced to not fight. You have to be convinced to not resist. You have to be convinced to not stand up against it. And when you do, make sure you're fighting for your loves.
Speaker 13You know, nobody should be pursuing vengeance. They should be pursuing emancipation. And what are your loves? Equanimity, tolerance, beauty, free expression. We have acres of people buried at Arlington that just fought for your right to say whatever the hell you wanted, no matter who it offended. And anybody throughout history that ever opposed this was always on the wrong side of history.
Speaker 13Nobody wants to ban the Flat Eyes. flatter society. It's always not for saying things that are probably false, but for saying things that are frightfully true, frightfully to whom? The people who deign to rule your few cubic feet of flesh. So yes, my friend, we are going to win. I am very proud to be part of the Great Awakening, and everybody that joins us is our brothers and sisters in that great cause.
Ian MalcolmI couldn't agree more. And that's why I love having David in here, not only bringing his intellect, but always this positive energy. And it is contagious. And I'm pretty confident I'm not the only person that when listening to something from David like that, I feel like the men in the famous scene with Braveheart and the call for freedom, right?
Ian MalcolmIt stirs in the soul. And that's the thing that's so beautiful is that there are a lot of people right now that are not feeling stirred. They are sitting on the couch with another Budweiser and another round of Netflix, and they're depressed, they're sad, they're disenfranchised, they're disenchanted, right? They're looking for something to help pull them out of the misery, out of the rot, and out of essentially this slumber that our society has fallen under.
Ian MalcolmAnd that is the thing that is beautiful about this is a lot of people have a lot of reasons to be frustrated. And most of those are derivative of one central problem, which is this supremacist system that is taking your money. It's essentially feeding you propaganda. And the sole purpose of that is to demoralize you so that you just don't care, so that you're apathetic.
Ian MalcolmBut we do. We want to make the world better. And why? Not necessarily for our own selfish interests. but because we have a genuine passion to just make it better for everyone. And that's why this is going to be beautiful. It's why it's going to be spectacular. It's ultimately why we're going to win. Because our interest, those of building that better future for everyone, will always vanquish those of the selfish that just want it all for themselves.
Ian MalcolmBecause in one of those situations, everybody can be happy. In the other, almost nobody is. So which one is going to have the momentum, the velocity? It should be obvious. That's why they're terrified. And that's why they want to criminalize our speech, because they don't know how else to stop the positive messaging that we're constructing.
Ian MalcolmSo do what you can every day. Try to get those voices or those ears into these chats. If you've never spoken on a space, feel free to come up, grab a mic, put a comment in the purple pill, put a question in there, send me a direct message with a question you want me to ask. I don't care how you engage. All that I do is that you are participating.
Ian MalcolmThat's the most important thing. It doesn't matter if you're out speaking about this on a corner like Christopher Wood is. God love him wherever he is. I hope he's getting a lot of sleep right now and charging his batteries because we need heroes like him out in the public square. But we also need those that are perhaps a little bit more quiet.
Ian MalcolmMaybe they're a little bit more meek. Maybe they've got a different set of skills. Every one of us is playing our own specific particular part. We've got our own role and we were all given those by some higher power, right? So just take that, take whatever little piece that you feel you can contribute and just move that piece on the board.
Ian MalcolmAnd if we all do that, we are going to win this grand chess game against this chess master that is taking control of essentially everything. They literally control every single thing except what we do with our little pieces on that board. They can't control you. They can criminalize the act of you speaking. They can try and propagandize you so you stop thinking.
Ian MalcolmThey can try and demoralize you so you don't have any heart. They can fatten you up if you eat all of their slop. So don't do that. Listen to Mr. Truth Teller. I'm sure he's going to be holding a space. He'll tell you about those three Fs. And one of them is to treat your body like essentially a temple. Another one of those is to not fear the Jew.
Ian MalcolmSpeak about these issues. Speak confidently. Don't speak hatefully because that's not going to accomplish anything. But just merely point out the patterns. and suggest that you want a better tomorrow for everybody. And if there's something standing in the way, if there's an obstacle, it's reasonable to point that thing out.
Ian MalcolmSo if we keep doing it, everyone is going to win. And with that, I want to wish everybody a good morning, a good evening, a good afternoon, wherever you are in the world. I know we got folks from all over the planet, and I sincerely appreciate all of you. And so with that in mind, God bless for everything that you are.
Ian MalcolmGodspeed on our continued efforts going forward. We are going to win. A big shout out again to Mr. Jean Francois. It was always such a pleasure to have him. The space is recorded. Feel free to go back to the beginning. Listen to his introduction. Again, he goes over his entanglements with Jeffrey Epstein, some of the funding that he got, the reason Epstein was interested, the genetic work that they were doing, some of the ways that those play into the past, the present, the prospective future.
Ian MalcolmAnd what is it that this group of people is looking to do by monopolizing all of the AI? And why does that inevitably require that they control all of the energy that flows out of the Middle East? It's a very interesting set of suggestions. So go back and listen if you want. If you can't or if you don't want to, Mr. Truthteller is going to be opening a space momentarily.
Ian MalcolmI hope all of you are able to jump in there. I certainly will. And as always, a massive shout out to everybody on the panel. Amiru, it's always such a pleasure. Mr. Nietzsche, you are the wisest man on X. And Miss Joanne, the co-hostess with the mostest. If you're not following all of those people I just mentioned, I don't know what you're doing on this application.
Ian MalcolmSo lots of love to all of you. I promise we're going to continue to win. And I look forward to that future with all of you when we can shake hands in that nirvana that will be defined merely as an end to Jewish supremacy and a world in which we can all thrive. So lots of love. We will not devolve. We will continue to evolve and our civilization will go with it.
Ian MalcolmSo lots of love to everybody. Godspeed. Good night. Good day. Good morning.