DispatchJanuary 16, 2026·7.6 hours

The Destruction of Logic & Science

Ian Malcolm introduces the topic of the destruction of logic and science, fueled by ad hominem attacks and critiques of his ideas.

Held here entire — 929 passages across 12 chapters and 3 named voices, set down from the first word to the last.

Now playing · Introduction to Logic's Demise
0:00 / 7:36:51
Chapters — 12
  1. 0:00Introduction to Logic's DemiseIan Malcolm introduces the topic of the destruction of logic and science, fueled by ad hominem attacks and critiques of his ideas.
  2. 2:00IQ, Race Realism & GlobalismThe discussion delves into IQ, race realism, and the globalist agenda to homogenize societies and dismantle traditional norms.
  3. 10:43Propaganda & Societal EngineeringThe conversation explores how propaganda normalizes the abnormal and engineers societal changes, including gender identity and family structures.
  4. 24:51Genetics, IQ, and Social HierarchyThe host defends the reality of genetic differences and IQ, arguing against the notion that all people are equal in all regards.
  5. 39:36Globalist Agenda & Western DeclineThe discussion connects societal breakdown to a globalist agenda, aiming to create a uniform world ruled by a select few.
  6. 1:01:02The Dumbing Down of SocietyEskenor and others discuss the systematic dumbing down of society, where emotions now govern reason, leading to a decline in critical thinking.
  7. 1:55:12The Cult of Nick FuentesSpeakers dissect the cult-like following of Nick Fuentes, questioning his sincerity and the manipulative tactics used to control his audience.
  8. 3:00:36The ICE Debate & Southern WhitesA heated exchange erupts over the demographics of ICE officers and the role of Southern white men, exposing biases and ignorance.
  9. 5:01:31Propaganda's Impact on YouthDr. Roshanak explains how propaganda and social media exploit the biological vulnerabilities of children and adolescents, shaping their identities and beliefs.
  10. 6:17:02The Rise of Satanism & DemoralizationThe discussion touches upon the rise of Satanism as a control layer and the demoralization of society, leading to a crisis of meaning.
  11. 6:55:00Hollywood's Role in Social EngineeringSpeakers analyze how Hollywood has been used as an instrument for social engineering, promoting race-mixing and vilifying traditional masculinity.
  12. 7:32:30The Future of Film & CultureThe conversation concludes with a look at the future of film and culture, with AI offering a potential antidote to Hollywood's controlled narratives.

The Transcript

Ian MalcolmWell, all right. What a wild, strange world we find ourselves in. And as a result, it's very strange. I'll sometimes get messages from people asking if I could open a space because I suppose it's a rainy Friday for them wherever they might be in the world. And... had roughly maybe an hour or so and figured, you know what, it's been a long time since I've done something completely impromptu. And with all the things going on in the world, might as well take that time, try to be productive and try to share some thoughts with the ether. And so this will certainly be a collaborative conversation. Anybody and everybody that wants to come up is certainly welcome to. And the thing that I thought would be interesting to discuss, because in addition to

Ian Malcolmreceiving messages about spaces or opening one, or if I was doing one at some point next week, I've also gotten messaged by a number of individuals about other spaces in which my ideas are being either slurred or slandered or critiqued. Nothing is new there. And the thing that is particularly familiar is it's not that they are attacking or addressing or debating.

Ian Malcolmthe ideas. Instead, it is largely drive-by ad hominems. And it's so funny because it seems like this is now a regular thing, which I don't know how to describe or define that. But I can tell you that when I started doing these spaces, I don't know if it was maybe two years ago, the last thing that I ever thought would happen would that there would be spaces held about my handle. It's just strange because

Ian Malcolmyou know, as the individual that I suppose just has a small organic following, uh, that is trying to put out just truth about kind of uncomfortable topics. I never thought I would get a whole bunch of traction, certainly never thought I would make any kind of splash. And I absolutely would never have envisioned that some of the thoughts or words that I would share, uh, would be, and it's, uh, it's incredibly humbling that people like the lack will take those and then turn them into

Ian Malcolmlittle video clips, uh, some of which fly around this platform with, you know, tens or maybe even hundreds of thousands of views or impressions. Uh, but the craziest piece is to then find those clips and those segments, uh, whether it's on Jimmy door or Elijah Schaefer or other right wing alternative media outlets, uh, across YouTube, rumble, et cetera. Uh, and the, the reality I must've had

Ian MalcolmAt this point, 100 different screenshots sent to me where people would find my pinned tweet on other social networks with not just thousands or tens of thousands, but in some cases, millions and millions of impressions, which is what we are after, is just trying to spread the truth, to try to bring attention to our worldview, to try and notice the patterns and help others do so. And in doing that, to make the world a better place. It's the only thing I seek. And so when we started down that path, I...

Ian MalcolmAgain, I never had the assumption or the impression that not just my ideas, but that my handle would be a topic of conversation. And just yesterday, I was updated that there was a space running that had my handle in the name of it, which I found very strange because the people that were hosting it, I was not really familiar with. There was one, I guess, profile that I had seen at some point in the past.

Ian MalcolmBut otherwise, it was all novel to me. I didn't know any of these people. And yet there they are talking at length about my handle, my ideas. Not so much what was curious about it, not so much talking about the Jewish question, which is the thing that I primarily, I would suppose, focus on. But really going at my ideas around race, race realism, and the data that I use to arrive at my conclusions around.

Ian Malcolmthe races. They found that extremely offensive and upsetting. And so the next thing I knew, I joined the room, was talking with slash maybe debating, although I think to call it a debate would be like saying that LeBron James playing basketball against the kindergartner is a basketball game or match. It's not. That's a talented athlete fooling around with a child. And that's kind of what it felt like yesterday because the people that I was engaging with

Ian Malcolmit was just insufferable. And unfortunately, and I've got a new rule to myself because I get tagged in spaces often. Please come talk to us, which I find very, very, very strange because I try to always keep humility high, confidence high, arrogance low. And when you start seeing things like that on the app, it's kind of curious. Why would people want my ideas? Because for a long time, for...

Ian Malcolm10, 20 years trying to throw them out onto social media. They have been, let's say, they've been not only criticized, but they've been loathed by lots, in particular by liberals traditionally, but more recently by essentially anybody and everybody that doesn't want to just live in reality. And so what is it that they were upset about? Well, in particular, the big one is IQ. That's the big critique that gets people really upset.

Ian MalcolmAnd the notion that perhaps IQ in a fashion, or let's say that a majority, if not almost an entirety of the idea of IQ is something that is genetically inherited. Now, that is not just my worldview. It's actually the worldview of Jordan Peterson, for what it's worth, which is very curious because I don't agree with him about a lot of things, especially dealing with Israel and Jewish supremacy.

Ian MalcolmBut even Jordan Peterson, I've got a very famous, well, it's not famous. I've got a very useful clip, I should say, of Jordan Peterson on a podcast talking with somebody there on video and talking about how race realism is something that nobody wants to talk about because inherent in it is the reality that not all the races are the same, which leads us to the headline of this space, the destruction of logic and science.

Ian MalcolmNow, if you think about it, if you are the JQ, it is required that you essentially break down all peoples, all societies, all cultures and all norms so that they are effectively uniform. And you have to do that because otherwise, how are you going to run a one world government? How can you lord over an endless sea of nations and people?

Ian Malcolmthat have totally different customs that view one another, perhaps across borders, across oceans as either beneficial or detrimental, but certainly not one in the same. It doesn't work. And so when you start to look at things like the clergy plan, which we talk about, obviously, and this idea of constructing his words, not mine, Richard von clergy, who is married to a Jew, his ideas of a mongrelized society.

Ian Malcolmto basically mix everybody up so that you could not only remove their past, their traditions, their religion, their culture, the heritage, but that you could also deroute or deracinate all the things that would keep them unified as a homogenous people. It's one of the things that, for what it's worth, made the Americans willing to push back against the British, against the empire, because they were...

Ian MalcolmIt doesn't mean that they were all the same. There were people with blonde hair, brown hair, black hair. But they all looked and they said, we don't want to be ruled by the British crown because they viewed themselves as a unified body. And you can provide endless examples of that based on grounds of religion, which you could certainly go back and you can find endless examples. Go and just read through the history of Scotland.

Ian MalcolmIreland, and England. You will find all kinds of conflict amongst individuals that for the most part looked, thought, felt rather similar over literally what God or what rendition of the Christian God that they were going to worship. So people fight amongst all these types of different things, even when they're nearly identical, if they view something as an other. And so if you're going to have the one world order,

Ian Malcolmwhich I think is very simplistic to say is not only an aspiration of Zionism, but is clearly the motivations of the Trump administration, of the technocrats that are funding him, of the technocrats that Trump is authorizing to roll out, let's say, databases like Palantir. This all seems very, very straightforward, as does the obvious influx of mass migration and not only of the people that are different, but of the pushing of a message.

Ian Malcolmthrough Netflix, through Disney, through every aspect of pop culture. That interracial everything is where it's at. That you are, of course, a bigot and a racist if you don't support it. And that perhaps you're a bigot and a racist if you don't participate in it. Wouldn't that be the next obvious conclusion or step of this system? And why? Because they want everybody in the Western world to look essentially, and this is why I think they revel in

Ian Malcolmat the altar of Zendaya. That's what they want everybody to look like. Either her or perhaps Derek Jeter, some rendition of that. I'm not saying that that's good or bad. I don't think Zendaya is a particularly attractive woman, even though the media insists on telling us that she is. But either way, even if that's your cup of tea, that's totally fine. People should be free to love, in my opinion anyway, whomever they want. That could be

Ian MalcolmIrregardless of things like race, religion, or even gender. I really do believe that. We had a debate about this the other day. And I was saying, look, there's probably a small subset. I do think it's a very small subset, but there's probably a small subset of people that genetically or biologically are predisposed to insert thing here. That could be either that they find people of the same sex attractive, or maybe people of other races attractive, or maybe they find aliens attractive.

Ian MalcolmOr even animals. Don't ever do things with animals. That is illegal. I think in most parts of the world anyway. Right? But if you have an inclination to something, you do you, boo, as they would say. If that's in your genetic makeup, I don't have to appreciate it. I don't have to support it. I certainly don't have to define it as marriage, which is a term that has a religious foundation, not a government-sponsored one.

Ian MalcolmAnd so my religion has no business being infringed by some kind of political or social norms. That's perfectly reasonable. So I can oppose it. I don't have to like it. But what I can certainly object to is the propagandizing of it, the normalizing of what I believe to be the abnormal. You don't over a single generation go from one or 2% of the general population viewing themselves as something other than straight.

Ian Malcolmto that number going to 5% a generation later, to 25% a generation after that. That does not just happen because you stop, let's say, frowning upon something. That happens because you propagandize that something. And if you need any better examples of this, just look at the number of youth who have not only gone through, I don't know what kind of, let's say, sexual experiences and come out the other end and realize, wow, maybe I...

Ian MalcolmI don't believe in that. But let's take it to the extreme and look at the trans community where you actually have not only extremely high rates of suicide amongst pre-operation trans people, those that think themselves a different gender. Yes, they are extremely high in suicide. I'm not advocating or celebrating that or anything. I'm just giving you the data. But you know who has even higher degrees of suicide? Post-op transgendered people. Isn't that weird?

Ian MalcolmIt's almost as if the operation is not the pathway to any better tomorrow for these people. Perhaps they just feel really uncomfortable in their own shoes for any number of 6 million different reasons. But they convince themselves because the TV helps them in this, that if they just, well, if I whack off this part of my body, I'm going to feel better in my shoes tomorrow. Well, the data would suggest that they don't. Again, that's not me being hateful or bigot. That's just the data. And so what are these things? They're the pushing,

Ian Malcolmnorms, the reconstruction of new norms, and all to essentially bring about, again, that mongrelized tomorrow, where you've destroyed all of the races, all of the religions, all of the traditional norms, the nuclear family. They don't want any of that. They essentially want, and we even saw this term, birthing people. What an insane set of terminology the quote-unquote woke people utilized just a couple years ago.

Ian MalcolmI'll never forget the first time I heard that one. Oh, okay, we can't call women women anymore. We can't call men men anymore. Those terms have to go out the window. Now, I want to continue having, let's say, some kind of traditional nuclear relationship between a woman and a man. We're going to not refer to them as women. No, we'll refer to them as birthing people. That's how absurd all of this got.

Ian MalcolmSo they want that basically to be the tomorrow. Are you a birther or not? Either way, you could be a man or a woman. And either way, you can be in a relationship with a man or a woman. And guess what you also probably won't do in this future dystopian state is to have a child and to raise a child a traditional way. They probably want that to go out the window as well. And there's actually in the way back of my mind, there's a perhaps not so crazy theory.

Ian Malcolmthat maybe that's what the COVID virus was actually about, or the vaccine was about destroying or being detrimental to the reproductive functionality of certain people. There's data, again, that would provide this or suggest this, that maybe in the long run will make it really difficult for people to do that. And then what do you get? You get a future society in which men and women are no longer things. Sexuality is just free to whatever you want. And you mail order your baby from some test tube company after, of course, getting approved.

Ian Malcolmby whatever the government body would be that will provide that. And I know that these things sound crazy, but so too does the idea of a birthing person. So too does the idea that genetics are completely meaningless. They have no, let's say, impact on your world, on who you are, on what you look like, on how you think, on how capable you might be of thinking. Apparently that's offensive to suggest.

Ian MalcolmAnd so on this conversation about genetics, I asked these people that we were discussing this. I said, well, let me ask you, is your average person in Mexico taller or shorter than your average Scandinavian? Now, the funny part is the first response was that they didn't know. That's what they suggested. Now, I don't know if that was them being ignorant or obtuse. Maybe they were just lying because they didn't want to be honest about the situation. Obviously, if you don't believe me, just go to Google.

Ian MalcolmObviously, your average person in Mexico is not just going to be shorter. They're going to be way shorter. Some data points might suggest as much as a foot on average that they are going to be shorter. Think about that for a moment. Let's just presume the averages are six foot two versus five foot two. That is essentially, it's not quite 20. Well, it's a 20% increase above the Mexican. If you look at your average Mexican, how much taller is your average Scandinavian person? 20%.

Ian MalcolmSo then when you go and you suggest, oh, I don't know, maybe in addition to things like height, perhaps you could have other genetic predispositions, whether it's around weight, whether it's around your skin color, your hair color, your eye color, all of these things, some of which are dominant, some are recessive traits. This is very, very basic. These are things that most people learn in grade school, perhaps in high school.

Ian MalcolmBut genetics are very real. They're very obvious. You can throw them out the window and say, oh, no, we live in a computer simulation. That's just that's fake science. And I suppose the same person that might say that might also say that everything around, let's say, the solar system or understanding of how that works, all that is also fake science. All of it is fake. And I guess you can take that. You could take that position if you want to. But if you're going to take that, you have to live in the reality that you're basically saying the entire world is fake. Everything is fake. Nothing is real. Nothing can be defined.

Ian MalcolmBut a person that thinks that way cannot be in an adult conversation about these subjects. That's unreasonable. If that's the case, I might as well enter any kind of, I might as well go sign up for a poker tournament and say, actually, the things that are on these cards don't matter. I win. Give me all the chips. But why would I even do that? Because if everything is fake, well, then so too are the chips. So too is the money. So too is the things that I would buy with the money. It's all fake.

Ian MalcolmIt's a ridiculous way to look at the world. We have to understand, even if we're in a matrix, digitally speaking, let's understand how that matrix works so that we can better exist within it. And as far as I can tell, it's very self-evident that there are certain groups of people that, again, taller, that maybe are more athletic, that have faster twitch muscle movements. And I brought up this very thing. And for what it's worth, I know that it's very offensive to talk about genetics for some reason.

Ian MalcolmBecause apparently it means to be a supremacist. And yet I, as the guy who focuses on things like science, like genetics, am happy to say that blacks on average have a higher fast twitch muscle density. What does that mean? That for things like jumping, sprinting, and other physical activities loosely attributed to sports like basketball, they are going to be genetically superior. Doesn't mean all.

Ian MalcolmIt doesn't mean that anybody with that genetic predisposition is going to be LeBron James. Obviously, you have to work with what you got. You've got to harness your skills. The person with the highest IQ that never does anything with it is just a high IQ couch potato. And similarly, you could be a low IQ individual who puts whatever motor you've got to the best of your abilities forward. And maybe you can accomplish a lot. A car with a little bit of horsepower can go a long way.

Ian MalcolmIt's just going to have to work harder, perhaps strain a little bit more than a high horsepower motor. The high horsepower one might be able to generate more torque, more power, go faster. Okay. But if you're not putting your foot on the gas pedal, it doesn't matter. It doesn't mean that one group of people is better or worse than another. Is a Ford Mustang a better car than a Ford F-150? Well, how do you define better? They both have their applications.

Ian Malcolmdifferent ways in which they might be better than another. But those are across demonstrable metrics. Which of those two cars can go faster 0 to 60? The Mustang. Which can tow more things? The Ford F-150, obviously. But those are the outputs of the inherent, let's say, capabilities of those proverbial vehicles. We as human beings are vehicles. You have innate abilities.

Ian MalcolmNow, you can either maximize them or you can do nothing with them. LeBron James is a person that you could have never heard the name of. Could have decided a long time ago, wanted to eat lots of Cheetos, do nothing, let's say, to better his athleticism, not harness any of those skills, and he could be working at a cashier at a gas station. That 1,000% could have happened. And similarly, a person without his genetic abilities.

Ian MalcolmInstead of being at the gas station, might be on the NBA court. Perhaps somebody like Steph Curry. Now, what's curious about Steph Curry? A, he's small. Genetically speaking, he shouldn't necessarily be on the basketball court. It's not to his advantage. There's lots of other guys that could play his position that are taller, perhaps are faster. But what did Steph Curry have going for him? Oh, that's right. If I'm not mistaken, his father was a professional basketball player.

Ian MalcolmI wonder if the genetics in his father that made him such a wonderful athlete might have been passed down to Steph Curry. And if so, I wonder if his father being a professional athlete meant that he was going to focus his son on putting those genetic predispositions to use. You can do the exact same thing with the Manning family. Is it remotely surprising that an incredible athlete had three boys and that two of them

Ian Malcolmwent to the NFL, if I'm not mistaken, I think the third got injured, which prohibited him from having a similar career. What are the odds that three people from a single family could be professional caliber athletes? Well, when you have the genetics of a person that was incredibly good at that game, that skill, that sport, whatever you want to call it, it makes perfect sense. But people don't want to accept these things. People don't want to deal with the fact because it's already difficult enough as it is.

Ian MalcolmThere's many things that I feel very, let's say, proud is the wrong word. I feel fortunate or blessed because there were certain genetic gifts that I was perhaps given that I'm very comfortable with. Maybe there's other people who don't. It must be really, really difficult to be. And I just saw a video about this. There was a comedian. I'll try to tell their joke loosely because it was a tall, thin comedian. And he was saying that his short, let's say colleague,

Ian MalcolmTold him once, oh, it might gotta be so much easier to be as tall as you are. If I was that tall, I'd run this company. And the comedian looked at him and said, well, if I was as short as you, I'd probably off myself. That's a joke. But there is something to be said. The whole idea of being a quote unquote short king. Why is that kind of sarcasm in the Western world? Well, because if you're a shorter guy, life can be a little bit more difficult. And I can give you all kinds of data points around that.

Ian MalcolmYou can look at the CEOs of the companies. You can look at the presidents of the United States. Do you know that statistically of the two candidates, whether it's Republican or the Democrat, the one that is taller has a significantly higher chance of being elected? Now, why is that? That's because of psychology. You look at the two men. One of them's way taller than the other. He's got to be more dominant. He's probably better suited for insert thing here. There's also, of course, the reality that women like taller men. So if I was a short, short, short, short, short man,

Ian MalcolmI would probably look up at tall men and I would be a little bit upset. Not only would I probably resent them for it, I would feel insecure about who I was, perspectively. I think I've actually been able to do a decent job taking insecurity and throwing it out the window. And I think I demonstrate that with my activities on this application where people come in and they critique all kinds of things. I don't care. It doesn't ruffle my feathers. I'm very confident in what I am, who I am, and what I believe. But if I was an insecure person,

Ian MalcolmPerhaps because I was unattractive, because I was short, because I was unintelligent. I would probably hate those other things that I was not. The short guy probably resents the tall guy. The dumb person probably resents the smart person. Now, the problem with intellect in particular is Dunning-Kruger, which basically suggests that an individual who is not intelligent is unfortunately not intelligent enough to recognize that they are not intelligent.

Ian MalcolmA child is not capable of recognizing how to conduct themselves out in an adult situation. You can't take a five-year-old and put him in the middle of a formal gala or a ballroom or a boardroom. They don't know how to behave. They don't know how to act. They don't know how to conduct themselves. And how could they? And similarly, the fool doesn't know that he's a fool in many cases. There's going to be examples here and there. But the wildest part is recognizing that smart people,

Ian Malcolmare largely intelligent enough not only to recognize that perhaps they are a little bit smarter than your average person, but they're also able to recognize their blind spots. They're able to look at the world and to say, that person's clearly smarter than me. And most intelligent people are very, very capable of that. That's why they have a respect for intellect. Fools aren't able to do it. So it's almost as if you're getting to the racetrack and you've got your Ford Mustang and you look next to you and there's a Lamborghini.

Ian MalcolmAnd the guy in the Ford is like, this is going to go poorly. And you know what's next to the Ford is the guy who's in the 1990 minivan. And he's looking at the two cars next to him. He's like, I got this. Don't worry, guys. I'm going to crush these two cars because he's a fool. And it's the same thing with intellect. And as a result, foolish people can't make, or it's very difficult for them to make, intelligent conclusions. And so what are we seeing? And why do I bring up the idea of the fool?

Ian MalcolmIt's because we live in a society today where the people in charge lie about everything. They lie about the state of the world. They lie about the genocide of the Palestinians. They lie about the idea that all people are always equal in all regards. No, they're not. People are equal in the sense that they should be equal under the law. Men should have an equal opportunity with women in terms of the law. If they want to pursue education, I can support that stuff. But in the case of modernity,

Ian MalcolmIs a woman who wants to be a traditional housewife who wants to raise a nuclear family, is she treated as equal to the woman that's got the high paying job at the office? No. Society frowns on her. So why is it that we need to demand that men and women are equal in all these different ways, but that even women with other women aren't equal if they want to pursue traditional norms? And that's when you start to realize the patterns. None of this is about progressing society.

Ian MalcolmThey are not trying to convince you that everybody is equally capable because they want you to be equally productive and successful and all those other things. They want to deroute the idea that there are differences between people. Because if the goal is to mix up society and to execute the clergy plan, you certainly can't do that. If people recognize, well, this group's probably more intelligent than that group.

Ian MalcolmMaybe they're going to behave differently. Maybe they're going to commit less crime. Maybe they're better suited to raise a child. Maybe they're dot, dot, dot, dot, dot, dot, dot. They want to get rid of that. And that's why I bring up statistics. And that's why I would say, and there's reason to it, that there are better choices that you can make when it comes to your partners, your employees, your bosses, your next door neighbors, based on things like race and other demographic factors.

Ian Malcolmlet's say, characteristics. And do you know how we know this is true? Because even amongst that group that many might be thinking right now, I'm automatically implying you wouldn't want to be neighbors with. Well, who do wealthy black people want to be neighbors around? Be real. Be honest with yourself. Do the rap stars of the world, does Puff Daddy live in the inner cities of New York or Los Angeles before he went to jail for being a pervert? No, he didn't. He lived in a gated community.

Ian MalcolmAnd he probably lived around a lot of white people. Now, you could make the statement, and it is true, that that might be because there are more, quote unquote, white people, which especially in L.A., we should look at if they're actually white. Right. But there are lower levels of crime. In fact, you want to know what the whitest state in America is? It's Maine. Do you know what state has the lowest levels of crime in the country? It's Maine. Is that racist to say? Is it bigoted?

Ian MalcolmIs it reasonable for a white person to want to live around other white people if it's going to result in lower crime? I'm not making this necessarily about whites and blacks in crime, although I do have lots of data points to go off on that. But rather to suggest that the machine, in its attempt to destroy logic and science, wants to say everyone is the same. We are all one in the same. Don't worry when we put you in the blender and mix everything up.

Ian MalcolmEverything is the same. Everything is fine. But we know that that's not the case because we can literally look at the most diverse parts of the country or those in particular that have the highest representation of one demographic of people, and you're going to find the most crime. The idea of the other side of the tracks, that old little proverb, that's where things get bad, the other side of the track. Do you know why that is? Because the intersection of wealth and poverty is where you get the most crime.

Ian MalcolmThat is the reality. And why is that? Because people that are poor, that live around other people that are poor, but aren't trying to keep up with anybody else, well, they might be just fine amongst themselves. How do we know that this is the case? If you look at the poorest people in the Appalachians, poorest whites in the country, you have low crime. Now, they have access to technology and all these other things, but they look around and their neighbors are just like them.

Ian MalcolmThey can all get together and they can be just as disenfranchised, just as frustrated, just as impoverished. But they're not robbing from one another. They're not having all the drugs and all the other things that you see in the inner cities. Now, that doesn't mean that you don't get some crime and you get more crime in very poor white areas than you do in very high wealth white areas. That is true. That is irrefutably true. With poverty comes more crime. Absolutely.

Ian MalcolmBut where you get the intersection of the violence, of the criminality, the hotbeds are always those areas where the two are slammed together. Look at any major metropolitan area. New York being a wonderful example. Chicago, a wonderful example. You could kind of say Baltimore. Wonderful example. Where you get the intersection of people driving around in their Rolls Royce along the street with a whole bunch of homeless people next to them. You're going to get a lot of crime.

Ian Malcolmbecause you're going to get envy and anger. Things do not work when you just blend them all up. And you could loosely use this exact same set of logic, talking about New York City as a micro, and you could expand it to the macro. You're going to get crime when you import people from the third world who come from a different set of cultures, different set of ideals, a different degree of poverty, and you put them amongst wealthy, intelligent people. Things are going to go poorly.

Ian MalcolmBut you can't know that. You're not supposed to know that. You're supposed to ignore it, even as things get worse. You're supposed to pretend it's not happening, even as you watch it take place. And at the end of all of it, you're told by the television that these people are going to become just like you, their kids, just like yours, equally capable, equally competent, even if the output of it is just more degeneracy, more poverty, more discohesion.

Ian MalcolmAnd that's what we are seeing all across the Western world because they have broken down logic and science. And they've done so largely because from a cultural Marxist perspective, that's what they have to do to break you down so that you're perfectly fine watching as your country and every other country slowly become one in the same, which brings us back to Zionism. Because the people that are doing this, that is their end game. It is to basically have the entire world.

Ian Malcolmruled by a certain group of people largely controlled out of essentially Tel Aviv, if not the greater Israel, loosely speaking. That's why they're taking out Maduro. That's why they want to take down Iran. It's all to build out this next iteration of what's going to be the future state of the modern world. Because for the last couple decades, it's been largely run out of the United States. It's then slowly been exported over to China because that was beneficial for them.

Ian MalcolmBut now they're taking all of the jobs, all of the funding, all of the opportunity. What do you think USAID was, folks? It was just another way that they could take your, if you're an American, hard-earned money and to send it elsewhere for projects of reconstruction, rebuilding, and financing to build those things up. So then you look back at the very ideas of Karl Marx, and you read through his writing, and what do you recognize?

Ian MalcolmBut that whether it was Marx, whether it was Herzl, whether it was Moses Hess, all of them talked about the need for society to become uniform. And ironically, it was in one of those writings that the letter to Karl Marx said the only way to get there was a revolutionary Holocaust. That was their term. And that's what they were using to describe the societies that would not be sophisticated enough to accept global communism and the common term.

Ian MalcolmThey would just get rid of all those people and purge them. So what do you notice today? Well, they can't purge everybody, although you could make the argument that perhaps they tried to with the COVID vaccine, I suppose. But if they can't do that, what are they going to do? They will have to lift up the third world. How do you do that? You export its poverty and its crime to the first world. And then what do you get? You get a global second tier planet that is going to be ruled over.

Ian Malcolmby the first tier that is going to be the greater Israel. That's why all of your money is going there. That's why all of the rest of it is going anywhere else but you, if you're an American or a Westerner. And that's why your nation is being intentionally destroyed. And so once you recognize that and you see those patterns, everything else that otherwise would make zero sense makes perfect sense with crystal clarity. And so they're going to further deteriorate all these things. They're going to get rid of all

Ian Malcolmtrue science, true genetics, true emphasis on things like IQ. Because after all, if they're going to try and get the, let's say very sophisticated high tier girl from the, uh, what is it? The Billy Joel song, the uptown girl, the uptown girl and her refined world. How is she going to ever be interested in slumming it with Billy Joel as he comes up the subway with all his degeneracy? Oh, that's right.

Ian MalcolmWe'll just program her with the television to believe that she's a bigot if she doesn't. And to convince her that in spite of all the other indicators, that they're one in the same. And that that guy who might not be able to pronounce his own name, might not be able to spell his address, might not be able to pull up his pants because he doesn't own a belt. And might have been programmed to believe that having them hang down below his bottom is somehow cool. Even though the origins of that is literally from prison systems.

Ian Malcolmfrom men that wanted to basically make themselves open to that kind of activity from other men. What a wild world that they were able to actually convince black community that that's a cool thing to do. Yeah, have your pants, have them hang low, signal to all the other bros that you're in for that kind of stuff. That's really masculine. That is our society in a nutshell. People have been perverted and programmed to believe that which is...

Ian MalcolmNot only ridiculous, but it's antithetical to the truth. Human beings are not all one in the same. Not even close. And I'm perfectly willing to concede blacks are going to be better suited for the basketball court. Asians are going to be better suited to do mathematics. I think they're also loosely better at replicating things over and over and over again until they get them into a really perfected state. I think that's probably one of their fortes.

Ian MalcolmBut we could also look at German engineering, which for the longest time was revered for everything from instruments, whether it was musical to the instrument you might wear around your wrist, AKA a watch. The Germans were known for unbelievable engineering and intellect and creativity. That's why even to this very day, people will say that often German engineered cars, they're gonna be the most cutting edge. But if you want something that's reliable,

Ian Malcolmand that's been tested over and over and over again, well, then get a Japanese car because they're really good at perfecting that. But the Germans might have an edge when it comes to creating the next generation of things. These tropes, they have a basis in reality. But the weird part is that everybody's totally fine saying that the Asians are great at math or might have a high IQ. Blacks are better at basketball.

Ian MalcolmEverybody's totally fine saying that. They can even make a movie entitled White Men Can't Jump. Nobody flinches an eye. But you dare suggest that there's anything about white culture, perhaps about white genetics, that might give an advantage in anything. And the entire world freaks out. And why? Because the same people that have programmed that knee-jerk reaction are the same ones that are propagandizing the destruction of logic, science,

Ian Malcolmreason and the destruction of everything that you might hold dear in the modern world. And so I wanted to kind of get that off of my chest, thought it might be an interesting little conversation with that happy and interested in all of your thoughts. Tell me I'm crazy. Tell me I'm a fool. But either way, I promise you, tell me with data, come up with logic, science and reason. And if you don't, I will probably embarrass you with just that.

Speaker 1And so with that being said, Joanne, I'm happy to bring up anybody if they want to speak. And if not, at least rant completed for anybody that might have found it remotely interesting. Ian, amazing space. Thank you so much for holding it. And it reminded me of Tikkun Olam, that thing that they believe that they are healing the world and by destroying culture, by making everyone beige, by...

Speaker 1making people not have genders and the surveillance state and also for people to be enslaved to them. And they give them like a little bit of money so that they can like control them and all of those things. And they can only get away with it by the destruction of logic and science, right? So thank you so much for holding it. And it's such an important topic to have. And I'm just really happy to be here. Also...

Speaker 1Twitter is super glitchy. So guys, please repost this space because we don't have purple peel right now. And it's in the Jumbotron. You can just click on Ian's thing and you guys can repost it. So thank you so much, Ian. Amazing topic. Veritas, go ahead, sir. Welcome. How are you?

Ian MalcolmI'm good. Thank you, Joanne. And thank you, Ian, for holding the space. But I have to say, I think you're just a white supremacist there, Ian, right? No, I'm just kidding. And yeah, isn't it interesting? Because it basically feels like white supremacy is the... And somebody actually had the outlandishness of posting this. They said, what's the difference between Jewish supremacy and white supremacy? And my response was,

Ian MalcolmOne seeks to enslave the world and the other seeks to simply oppose that from happening. And that's really, I feel like it's that simple. It's like they think that they can destroy your entire society. And if you do anything to reject it or suggest that it should be protected, you're a bigot. It's really unbelievable. And when the person said that, I think I ratioed them pretty handily. But either way, I think the masses, it's one of those things where what I just suggested should make perfect sense. It's just that most people

Speaker 2won't even be willing to speak it because they don't want to offend people's sensibilities. Yeah, absolutely. And I think the biggest difference is that they love to destroy, we love to build, right? All those innovations and inventions that doesn't come from nowhere, right? a couple of pushbacks birthing people yeah that's men as well nowadays they can make men give birth to children now that's weird also they can make robots give birth to babies which is even weirder I've been in that space for like an hour after you left

Speaker 2and of course there was a lot of discussion and i've i've been censored a couple of times every time i brought up my point i was cut out and basically like you called a white supremacist right because i wanted to explain uh why these iq tests have been taken in all those countries so you can basically evaluate how you can average the world right why the sub-saharan's go to uh europe right and not not the asians so it's it's it was so such a bigotry and in that space and then the the um false fallacy came up uh that

Speaker 2In China, you will find the tallest and the smallest person. No, that's actually absolute bonkers, right? The tallest man was an American who is 8 foot 11, which is 2 meter and 72. And the tallest living person is 8 foot 2, which is 2 meter and 51, who is living right now in Turkey. It's just so sad to see that people just can't grasp the fact of what average means.

Speaker 2per capita means, what statistical outliers mean, how the bell curve functions, how you have to read that. I mean, it's just sad to say. But yeah, 140 IQ might be not enough, it seems, like the host claimed to have.

Ian MalcolmYeah, it's just wild. And real quick, to add some more fuel to your fire here, the very statement, right, I mentioned Dunning-Kruger, the very individual that would shamelessly suggest that they have 140 IQ, I use the term shamelessly because they were incapable of recognizing how preposterous what they were saying actually was. It would be like a Mexican person saying, I'm seven feet tall on a space, and I can sit there and I can just say, you know, which I did.

Ian MalcolmI said, I think you're lying. And then they tried to scramble and they were like, well, no, and I'm not going to share it because I bought it. No. And so then I did the statistics. And again, this goes back to what you're saying, Veritas, right? About looking at data and probabilities. And she said that she was Pakistani. So this isn't to pick on anybody from Pakistan. There's probably plenty of smart people. But 140 IQ is an extreme outlier. So I just ran the data. And apparently there's three every 100,000.

Ian MalcolmPakistanis. That's the probability, right? So think about, like, to try and illustrate, okay, that would mean that in some of the biggest athletic stadiums in the world, where maybe you can fit 100,000 people, there's three of them inside that thing that would be at that level of IQ if you're in Pakistan when you do this study. And that woman who could barely complete a sentence wanted to proclaim that she was at that degree of intellect, which not only, A, am I almost completely certain was a complete lie,

Ian MalcolmBut B, she's so low IQ that she doesn't know enough about IQ to know how ridiculous it is. It would be like a little kid saying, I'm going to grow up to be nine feet tall. And you're like, no, no, I'm sorry, four-year-old. You're probably not, right? But the four-year-old's not smart enough. And if so, you will die by the age of 25, right? Because you have some genetic disease that gives you some giantism.

Ian MalcolmUm, I was, I was still waiting. It's also, ironically, we heard another individual say the exact same thing, except when they did it, it was a Jewish person who said that they tested at a one fort. It was Israel. He was a black Jewish. Uh, what is a black Jew in Israel? And he said that at age four or five, he tested at 140 IQ. Where are people coming up with this number?

Ian MalcolmGuys, if you want to say that you're intelligent, aim for something between maybe 105, 110, 115. You want to get pretty bold, 120. To suggest that you're 140 is like saying I'm 6'11". The statistics are just not there. But people that are not intelligent, not only do they not know that, but they're also not intelligent enough to recognize that an intelligent person is going to call them out on it because they sound ridiculous. Sorry, Veritas.

Speaker 2you know all good um can you can you um tell me the average iq of the last 100 posts i have yeah that's that's where you get these high numbers uh maybe you copy and paste it or you use some ai and the ai saying that that is it's smart himself right um i was so waiting for you to ask her uh when she said that she took the iq test at her psychologist

Ian MalcolmI was so waiting for you to ask her what she was in therapy for. But you missed that chance, right? Shame on you. Yeah, no, and I did. And it was funny because I asked her what the test was like. Well, I did things with numbers and words. And then they told me what it's like. All right, whatever you say there, kiddo. But that would have been very funny. Yes. So what precisely are you in therapy for?

Speaker 2If it's schizophrenia, then I'm going to have to ask other questions about your ethnicity. But that's, we joke. But very, very well. Bipolar was my bet there. But yeah, maybe I'll ask her next time. She didn't get to speak soon enough, and I didn't want to bring up the joke. yeah it's it's just wild and people are so delusional and i i i don't get it um why they are so offended right even if if they are smart really smart um when they are the outlier why why feel offended uh about people of your um own group to not be in average that high right so it's it's just um it's just wild and and that's why you see

Speaker 2this tribalism that i've been talking about i'm not sure if you uh were in that in that space um when i talked about it but um it's the tribalism that is completely bred out of us and and basically beaten out of us right by social engineering and the media and everything that comes with it right 100 years of blaming the white man for everything that bad that has happened and

Speaker 2they show this tribalism. It's so bigotry to not allow us to have the same rights, basically. And then to speak of white supremacy is just so laughable. I think that there is some sort of supremacy, but that supremacy is the supremacy of usefulness. How useful are you to the system, to the people in power? Yeah, you can assert your supremacy. You can actually feel it, right? You mentioned white crimes are higher in low-income areas. That might be true, but I would say the severeness of the crimes in high-income areas is way higher, right? Tax evasion and

Speaker 2drug usage, whatever, right? So the severity is basically higher, but it's not as recorded. So there comes supremacy of usefulness in play. And that's across the board, right? It doesn't matter if you're black, if you're white, if you're Jewish, if you're Asian, when you have a certain level of socio-economical standing, you get away with basically everything, right?

Speaker 2The normal John Smith or the normal maybe Shlomo Finkelstein gets one. But the normal Joe doesn't get a plea deal for major crimes, right? No, that's very true. And yes, especially when it comes to criminality, I wouldn't be remotely surprised if there is all sorts of nefarious stuff that take place even in very –

Ian Malcolmhigh net worth parts of the country that are predominantly white. But yes, especially when it comes to violent crimes, those are on the lower end of the financial totem pole. They tend to happen more and more and more. Now, what's curious is you can also find very rich people committing very violent crimes. And if you need any examples of that, just look at professional athletes who have been involved in murders in the not so distant past, along with, if I'm not mistaken, some of the rappers.

Ian Malcolmof the world. And they do tend to have a, let's say, a certain racial demographic that that tends to exist within. But that's not an all everything or everything, but it's just a data point that is curious. And for what it's worth, according to the FBI, violent crimes in the richest bracket of black Americans are 2x that of the poorest whites in America.

Ian MalcolmAgain, that's not an all, everything is everything, but it should give us some kind of data off which we can start to make some kind of analysis of the world around us. But very nicely stated, Veritas. And again, none of these things, whether it's on IQ, whether it's on crime, whether it's on anything, are meant with any animosity towards anybody, right? This is just the reality of the world. And it's the reason that I suppose my worldviews are contentious.

Ian MalcolmBecause it does not go along with the idea that we are all the same, that diversity is the best thing ever. But everybody's been so programmed to just nod their heads, as that's stated by the television, that what I'm saying, even if based in reason and logic and statistics and data, is deemed extremely offensive and inflammatory. But very well stated. Let's go to Machiavelli and check in with him. Well, I wanted to add something. And hello, everyone. Good afternoon.

Speaker 3The thing is with psychology and the testing of IQ, it depends on what type of test. I was thrown in imposter center at 14 years old. So they made and they told me in court that if I said nothing, I would get out after two months. But after six weeks, they kind of told me, well, you're not saying anything. They tried to bully me. They tried to do a lot of psychological.

Speaker 3warfare to a 14 years old which i found at that time very funny but they did a psychological about regulation at or because they they said well if you're really dangerous we're gonna have to put you into a like closed center so i will okay go ahead do your tests it took them an afternoon and it started with very easy tests of associations with um

Speaker 3you know, like forms and stuff like that. After that, it went to associations with, example, she gave me a picture of a boy looking into a window and a small girl sleeping in the room. And I'm like, what are you guys trying to make me tell? Like, what the fuck? And then it went to the Rorschach test where she asked me to tell her,

Speaker 3what type of forms that I saw. After that, I had like, it was 699 questions and I had 399 of them that I needed to respond. The first one was, did you ever have a sexual interest into a squirrel? I looked at her and I was like, yes, I always had that intention towards squirrels. since I was a small little mopo I did the test and at the end they said that I had a IQ over 140 and they sadly gave me some medicine and threw me into a foster family that abused me beat me and fucked with me and they pretty much scared my mother into

Speaker 3even trying to have me back at her place because they told her, well, your son's very smart. So if he becomes a criminal. Did he drop? Oh, okay. I'm going to send him a mic. Don't let you guys.

Speaker 3I'm sorry, everyone. Oh, go ahead. To be depressive, like what they did to me is that they conditioned me into depression, into self-harm and self-hatred to the point that I wanted to commit suicide for like 20 years to the point that I. totally went into self-destruction and denial because I promised my mother I would never kill myself, and I'm Christian, so I can't do that. But they did everything like they still do. They won't admit that they are the cause for the majority of my issues because I never took amphetamines before 14 years old. But they gave me so many drugs at a young age.

Speaker 3age that I was addicted to amphetamines without even knowing. So I went towards the wrong crowds and all of that, but I'm good today. Well, for my condition, but I'm able to speak about it. This is what they do. So that person that you were speaking to in that space was about like, I'd say 90 to 100 max. but not more. Having an IQ is not something fun. It's something very fucking boring. Because everything around you is fucking bullshit. You look at people, the way they speak, when someone speaks, I know if they're being truthful or not. The majority of the time, if I see them, especially like now,

Speaker 3That guy has never said the truth once. You know, there's something, but it's not something fun to have. And it's about the frontal lobe. Because if you look at everyone that's aggressive and very violent, TBI is a symptom from someone getting hit in the front of the head, the frontal lobe. The person becomes irritable. You know, sometimes when I interrupt, that's a symptom, narcissism.

Speaker 3racism, you know, it really kind of looks at a certain type of society. So I don't know. People should maybe start to look at the way the brain is made as well. Maybe being a Black person gives you more athletic and more resistant perspectives in a certain aspect. That means in your environment. But being white... in the Nordic part, adding a frontal lobe to be able to visualize that there are seasons and I need to prepare to survive. If not, I'm going to freeze my ass. That's the point. IQ is just association. The fastest you associate things together and the way you're able to do it.

Ian MalcolmYeah, there's a lot to, and look, there's, of course, within any IQ test, there's, well, I shouldn't say any, but most, there's going to be different types of intelligence, right? And they try to average or weigh those dependents. So you've got fluid reasoning, you've got essentially ideas like data recall, spatial awareness, all of these are essentially factored into it, right? And so an example might-

Speaker 3I went to foster center because I was making adults uneasy. They were scared because I was telling them the truth constantly. Like I, I was, I went through shock at a young age. So my reaction was being honest, 100%. It doesn't work. So they did a very specific on that, but yeah, you're very right on that. Yeah. And these are just there again, there are things that that are reasonable to examine and it's,

Ian MalcolmIt is. It's challenging because I almost feel like, and I'll be curious for Sir Eskenor's thoughts on this, because I feel like he has always very curious takes on both the present, but then also how it ties into the past and some of these larger objectives. And it feels like if you just examine the last 20 or 30 or 40 years, and if you then perhaps compare today to 60 years ago, whether you're just looking at...

Ian Malcolmany of the, let's say the art that came out of it, that could be movies, that could be literature. We're obviously living in an era today that has been substantially dumbed down. Everything is being dumbed down. And then you look around and you recognize that at some point, the dumbing down of everything means the dumbing down of not only the norms, but also the lived experience of the people that are growing up in that world, right? So if you think about it today, a person who's born into modernity

Ian Malcolm10 years from now, 20 years from now, they're only going to know this, which is the dumbed down rendition of just 20 or 30 years ago. And if you compare that back to the writings, let's say some of the speeches that were given by leaders of just the United States, whether it's at its founding or even up until 20 or 30 years ago, think of how sophisticated and intelligent most of those people were. And now compare it to Donald Trump, who goes up there and

Ian Malcolmmumbles like a fool. So Eskenor, I'm kind of curious for your thoughts on the dumbing down of society as a result of, prospectively, the elimination of things like logic, science, reason, which is largely, of course, driven by this woke ideology that everybody and anything is exactly the same as one another. Yeah. Hey, man. How are you? I'm just enthused that you're here, my friend. Yeah, I saw the fucking title and I'm like, oh, I have some shit to say about that.

Speaker 4Yeah, you said his name three times, so you summoned him. Like Candyman, right? Look, I'm going to try to say this condensed because there's a lot of information I need to convey for it to make any kind of fucking sense, right? So, look, when we look around today, this is how I'll personify the problem, right? When you look at things like BLM, feminism, LGBTQ, it's blatant that emotions,

Speaker 4are governing reason logic and not the other way around. This is the obvious switch that happened where these emotional inclinations are giving people, are compelling people to govern their reason under them rather than have their emotions being governed by their fucking reason. This is a huge problem in society, right? So how the fuck did this happen? And when did it happen? As far as I can tell, there's two main, there's two main,

Speaker 4hurdles that made this happen. And I'll go back in time first. I'll go to the Renaissance. Actually, I'll go back in time to the ancient Greeks. Because everything that we're fighting for today as truthers is based on reason, justice, and these ideals, right? This is what the fuck is in our hearts today that was in theirs then that caused them to create things like democracy to liberate themselves from tyrants. The whole fucking purpose of democracy was to liberate themselves from tyrants. Freedom first.

Speaker 4Death is, you know, death is merited. Freedom is first. This is what we're fighting for today. So what the fuck happened? What the fuck happened? Two things happened. And, you know, the first one, people are not going to like it, but it's fucking true. The Holy Roman Empire, mostly through the Western wing and not so much the Byzantine wing, but both of them nonetheless. Look, in the ancient pagan mind that created democracy, the hierarchy is not a single godhead.

Speaker 4So how does this play out in the mind of people? Okay, I'm going to try to make this quick. I'm sorry, I know I'm talking a lot, but there's a lot of information. No, no, Eskenor, feel free, man. I'm very curious for the background on where you think this originates from. And so take all the time you need. Okay. All right, cool. Okay. So in the pagan, let's say the ancient Greek pantheon, you know, it's full of gods, demigods, titans, but...

Speaker 4Zeus is obviously the fucking godhead. He's the supreme. However, even though he's the supreme deity, he's still subject to the fates and to justice and to nemesis. Even though he's number one, all powerful, he's subject to certain ideals that should be thought of first, which is justice, nemesis, which nemesis is basically she's the...

Speaker 4She goes after those with high tubris. She brings everybody back down to reality when your tubris is high. So how does this stay out in the minds of people? Well, they believe that justice should come first and freedom comes first. In the mind of a Christian through the Holy Roman Empire, they switched this. They put a faith-based aspect to this. Whereas, oh, I don't need to.

Speaker 4apply justice myself because God has a plan where it will be taken care of or they're going to hell. It's always offshoring the accountability to make sure that justice is served today with your own fucking hands. So this is one huge problem with us governing reason. I'm sorry, governing our emotions through the lens of reason and not the other way around. And how this happened...

Speaker 4double down on this again, is the Renaissance era, there was the Romantic era, which was started by, what's his name? Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the first Romantic era philosopher. His philosophies, he was basically, to make a long story short, he used the inclinations of the heart, like love, as a gateway for people to accept and put their reason down for reasons of love. And how this is transmitted today is in the LGBTQ community.

Speaker 4And in feminism, it's through love and all this unity that we're doing all of these horrendous things and putting our reason to the side in order to achieve them. So again, reason has been fucked by two things. The Holy Roman Empire, their version of Christianity where it's a faith-based, it's a faith-based hierarchy and the Godhead, like, you know, everything's in the hands of God. God is not subservient to justice or to the faith. God is God.

Speaker 4So that's a huge mindfuck in the psyche of people. And then again, with Jean-Jacques Rousseau, which made everybody's heart to be their, you know, it made everybody basically wear their hearts on their sleeves and allow their hearts to govern their actions and not their reason. So the stoicism completely got destroyed out of society. There's no more stoicism. Everybody's just letting their emotions govern their every action and thought. And that's where we are today. So I don't know if I made sense, but that's where I'm at.

Ian MalcolmNo, very much so. And then it's reinforced. And it's interesting because that's one of the fundamental underpinnings of any of the efforts that I feel like we try to take on this application and in this intellectual battle, Eskenor, which is just let's unroot the truth and let's discuss it, right? And there's a lot of things that are trying to diminish what that means or even the definition of truth. And what was so crazy, and it's funny that you bring this idea up because

Ian Malcolmin one of those little, uh, little spats on things like genetics or IQ or data that we can look at, the person said, that might be your truth. And it's like, no, these, these are the facts. This is the truth. You don't, but we live in this world where that has even become a, a, a pop culture terminology that people would like to suggest, right? That if you're liberally minded and you believe in all the LGBT isms, that it is your truth.

Speaker 4that you can be a man who is a woman. That the idea of the truth has been completely destroyed. It no longer has any relevance to the conversation. I'm curious if you have any thoughts on that piece there, Eskenor. Yeah, well, look, you literally said it yourself. If reason is governing your mind, you'll never be confused about genders. There's two genders. It's not more complicated than fucking that. But if you listen to their crying, their emotional rug pulling, and you start getting gaslit emotionally...

Speaker 4you will circumvent your reason to align your heart with fucking bullshit, right? So that's really what it comes down to, and you're doing that with everything. So imagine trying to pull this kind of shit off in an ancient Greek state where reason comes first. It's not going to happen. Nobody's going to put their feelings ahead of what must be done for justice. Imagine saying that to Spartans, going to Spartans. Right. Imagine going to Sparta and saying,

Speaker 3this guy hurt my feelings, so I could have many genders. Like, that shit's not going to work. They're going to hang you on the fucking spot, dude. Kill you right there. The good old days, I guess. Well, yeah, but it solved issues. Because enabling... The idea is that everything is based on fear and denial. You have fear that enables denial. Denial becomes a type of narcissism that...

Speaker 3kind of bubbles you into a oh no it's me or you try to it's like psychologically fighting yourself and then slowly that becomes an obsession that morally and spiritually kills you and makes you addicted to any little thing around you this is the idea is that they got us addicted to small things my background in And religion is not the same as you said. It was more of a humbling thing. It wasn't to God. Okay, in the end, we win is a sentence that we said, but it's not what we taught. Like, my grandmother used to teach me the old version of religion. And it had a part that said that we must eat evil and destroy it. And this is something that...

Speaker 3you can't see in any church first of all i don't go to any church and anything like that so i understand what you said that they manipulated and used the potpourri and everything to change it to the lgbtq church and judo christianity and all of the little divisions that they created the fundamental idea that wasn't the same well not for my family at least

Speaker 4Very well stated there, Machiavelli. And let's go back to Escanor and then we'll go down to that Goy. Yeah, Alisha had another perspective. This is how I govern myself, guys. Take it or leave it, make with it what you will, right? Everything I just mentioned, I think of all the time. I think about justice and freedom above everything, above my faith, above what I want to happen, what I don't want to happen, none of that. And the second lens that I always...

Speaker 4And it's kind of pertinent to the subject, right? So Socrates is known as the greatest philosopher of all time. And the reason is, you know, there's one primary reason. And I read it reading Michel de Montaigne, who he started the Renaissance philosophies, right? So I'll try to explain it in a way that's, you know, layman. When I'm to do an action, you know, you think of these two things. Is what you're doing, saying, or thinking,

Speaker 4Are you doing it for the right reasons in the right way to the right person in a way that they're going to understand it? Always. I govern that. And number two, you know, don't get lost in a philosophical mess. Just ask yourself, is what I'm about to do or say, is it good? Are my intentions good? And if they are, you do it.

Speaker 4You don't start thinking of the repercussions, the consequences. Is it going to hurt people? Is it going to love people? What's it going to do to the other guy? When you start thinking of all these fucking things, you'll never take a positive step forward because you can philosophize yourself into everything being good or bad when you take a couple steps too far in. So keep shit simple. Is what I'm doing good? Are my intentions good? Am I doing it for the right reasons? If the answer is yes, you do it, even if the consequences are detrimental to you, to your family, to all of that. You keep reason first.

Ian MalcolmIs it good? Yes. End of conversation. So that's how I like to think. Yeah, no, so well stated. And Esquire, one of the curious pieces about it, and I'd be curious for your thoughts here, and then again, we'll go to that Goy, but that idea of ruling yourself based on truth, at times it's going to have, like you said, detrimental consequences to yourself, right? If you live in truth and you admit or confess to something that is, let's say, embarrassing or awkward, it might bring about all kinds of negative consequences, but that in the long run,

Ian Malcolmif you play by that, I say, northern star, ultimately it's going to put not only you, but society and everybody at large into the best position, whereas this society that we have today, which is largely just trying to live in what feels good or what is beneficial for the individual, you see all the negative consequences that come out of it. Yeah, and look, to express how this could fuck or make a society, right? Look, if everybody was thinking...

Speaker 4like the ancient Greeks were today. And everybody took that first step and did that one little small good thing today. But now, you know, today they're not actually doing it because they're manipulating their own mind into how this could eventually be a bad thing. So they're not taking that initial step. So people are not taking those good, direct, small actions, daily baby steps ever. They're offshoring that whole responsibility to some greater faith, some greater story, where they don't have to do fuck all and they can just continue to...

Speaker 4you know, stay on the bleachers and just eat popcorn and watch the fucking whole show go by. So that's a huge problem too, right? Inaction, sloth, right? It's a huge fucking problem. And it's usually, I don't want to say this, but it's the fucking truth. People are much bigger cowards than they are dumb and blind. Don't fall for it. They're not that dumb. They're not that blind, but they are big enough pussies to not do anything. And that's the honest, disgusting truth.

Speaker 4What do you do in Greece to people like that? You remember, Eskenor, what they used to do to traders and people that were just lazy of every kind of faith? Yeah, it didn't work out too well. But that's how it should be, man. Like, not for anything, the lowest IQ fucking, the parasites of society today are having kids in record numbers.

Speaker 4And the people of reason and mind and all that are not. This is not going to work out strictly based on how it's making us reproduce. It's making our fucking garbage reproduce, and it's making our best diminish. And the whole idea of Plato's Utopia or Aristotle's or whoever was to build the magnanimous man, which means society is built in a way to create those fucking all-star heroes of good pure heart that can govern society.

Ian MalcolmThat shit is gone today. We're creating fucking big parasites instead. It's the inversion that's going on. And that's it. What the fuck else do you want me to say? No, ask it. And I know I said I was going to go to that guy. I got to ask you one more question about this one, because it's very interesting. I feel like when you live in truth and righteousness and justice, there might be some negative consequences here and there. But.

Ian MalcolmYou get negative consequences when you lift weights at the gym. It can hurt in the moment. It's not actually hurt, but you feel the intensity in the moment, but you build for something better tomorrow. And I feel like what you're suggesting is almost at a societal level, instead of dealing in the truth and lifting those, let's say, spiritual weights and becoming a bigger and better and more productive society, we're essentially couch potatoes that just have a cancer because it feels better in the moment.

Ian Malcolmto sit on the couch than it does to go down to the gym. And to add as a supplemental question to it, it feels like, and I apologize to the women in the room, basing your decisions on feelings over facts feels to me like a more effeminate, innate way to go about the world. Again, I'm not attacking any women. There's plenty of logical women, but, but it feels like that is a more feminine or effeminate approach. And the one that is being pushed out

Ian Malcolmon all of society, which is essentially, in my belief structure anyway, it's why they are so antagonistic towards traditional masculinity, which they define as toxic masculinity. And they're so hell bent on everybody essentially becoming either metrosexual, if not homosexual, because in those maybe footsteps, men might approach a more effeminate approach to the world as well. I'd be curious for your thoughts. Yeah, I'd like to say something that,

Speaker 4I don't know if it answers your question, but it brings another perspective, right? Because everything's fucking bullshit that they're telling us today, obviously. You know, the ancient Greek societies looked at like, you know, they're fucking, you know, they're not exactly known as the most feminist society, but nothing the fuck could be further from the fucking truth. They lie about that shit too, right? And I come from a Greek home and it's represented today. So yeah, okay, women couldn't vote in the ancient Greek world. That's true. But you know who else couldn't vote?

Speaker 4People that are bums, people that are living off the state, people that don't go to the social endeavors, that have no idea what the fuck's happening in politics, they weren't allowed to vote either. However, women were in charge of the household, the money, the finances of the fucking household. And when the man was going to vote, who the fuck's vote do you think he was casting? He was casting the wife's fucking vote, guys. So who was really in power at the time? And I come from a Greek family today.

Speaker 4You know, when we go out in public, my dad is the patriarch, but at home, my mom is my mom. And anybody that comes from a European family knows what the fuck that means. It's your mom that beats the shit out of you. It's your mom, you know, the mom is the mom. She's behind the scenes, but she's in full fucking control of what's happening. So the ancients understood this, and instead of putting sexes against each other, work together. They knew, for example, that men were better orators.

Speaker 4But they also knew that women could write better speeches. So they had the women. Like, Pericles' speeches was from his wife because he knew that she could write better than he could. Did he cut off? What did you mean? No, I had a phone call. I had to cut. Sorry. So, yeah. So the ancient society, look, men and women are different. We're not the same. Obviously, I'm stronger than a fucking woman. Obviously. Does it mean that I'm better? No. But we shouldn't be...

Speaker 4You know, you shouldn't fight against me in the fucking boxing ring. Hello? But maybe you could, you know, train me and see some tactics. There's something we can do together that are better for both of us. But that's not how society is today. They put us all against each other and we're fighting instead of complimenting each other. And Eskenor, I have to ask you this one. This was in the Purple Pill from St. Fury talking about male-male relationships between older men and adolescent boys.

Speaker 4in ancient Greek culture? I'd be curious for your thoughts on that because coming off of Google, we know how that's trying to... Yeah, yeah, the pedigree question, right? Yeah, sure. So this whole, look, obviously I'm biased, I'm Greek, but I have facts to what I'm telling you as well. You have to think for yourself, right? And the idea to destroy that concept of idea of ideals is part of modern society's control system. So always remember that they have to shun

Speaker 4this type of society in order for you not to be governed by reason to begin with this whole idea of chemistry only started materializing in books and whatever since i think it was 1960 or 70. it was a certain author that's like he made a book based on two vases that he found one in crete and one in i want to say athens so that whole idea was fashioned from those two vases the reality is that

Speaker 4Yes, obviously there was sex trafficking, human trafficking. That's been going on, guys, in every society since the dawn of time. However, Socrates, when he was, how can I say, flirted by, what's his name, Alcibiades, which was the most beautiful boy in Greece, he turned him away. And he said, these acts are degenerate. So...

Speaker 4It wasn't part of society as we're being told it is today. I think that's being used as a weapon to diminish the culture as a whole so that we don't see how they viewed society and the reason and all of that. I don't know if that answers you, but the whole concept of the pedestry is only something that has flourished in the last hundred years. Before that...

Speaker 3It was just a small evolution, like maturity of a people. When we started as the Greek fundamentals, starting asking questions and being able to put them into thoughts and concepts and everything, society grew up. They tried to see things. They stopped it. One of the ones that broke the back of the Spartans was a group...

Speaker 3made by an older man and a younger man. They were said that they were homosexuals. It's not said that they were kept after because they disappeared. There's a normal process to being humans. We matured into what we are. We didn't become intelligent from, you know, we observed nature. We observed ourselves, compared, made logical assessments.

Ian Malcolmand corrected the ones that perverted and deranged our societies. Well, and Machiavelli and Reskinor, obviously we're talking about a society that had lasted a long period of time. And so to try and compare, for example, it wouldn't be all that much different, I suppose, from somewhere way down the timeline, somebody looking back on America and saying, yeah, but America was filled with, insert thing here, transgenderism, homosexuality, et cetera, et cetera.

Ian MalcolmAnd that hadn't existed for 200 plus years until very, very recently, right? So I guess what, Eskenor, you're talking about is perhaps a smaller piece of maybe a smaller aspect of the timeline. But because I always like to honor kind of free speech ideologies and St. Fury, I know you put a lot into the pill. And because you're up here on the speaker panel, curious if you want to have any thoughts or...

Speaker 5push back on anything that was shared, and maybe you guys can have a little bit of a discourse. Of course, respectfully, as I always advocate for. Yeah, certainly. Thanks, Ian. Appreciate your work, by the way, truly. And yeah, just to be clear, I'm not trying to trash Greek culture here. There was a ton, obviously, it's brought towards civilization. Moreover, just on the concept, since we are talking about IQ, and then it kind of ventured into morality, I just wanted to point out that

Speaker 5Essentially, the concept that you guys were kind of discussing here and almost championing, I would say, is the moral relativism. And I'd just like to point out that if you really give any deep thought into this or look at historical context for how moral relativism plays out in a society, it's essentially, you know, do what you think is right. And the problem with that, and the problem I often see here on a lot of spaces, is that people...

Speaker 5The issue with that is that most people don't have good morality, or even if they are well-intentioned, it doesn't always mean that it's going to be the right choice for everyone and or even themselves in some cases, right? And we see examples of this every single day. So again, I'm not trying to be contradictory by any means. I'm just saying as someone who's looked into this before, I think there's a lot of mis...

Speaker 5characterizations that goes along with Christianity in general. Ian, you might find this interesting, but out of all those countries who kicked out some of the people we're fighting against today, I'd like to argue that it was the church who did a lot of that work. It's also the church who did a lot of fighting over thousands of years of history to prevent Islam from conquering Europe.

Speaker 5and a lot of these evil forces that were at play here. So while I would argue to you most Christians are not great people, and I would even further argue that the Reformation brought a lot of horrible things like the Anglican Church, which has all the LGBT stuff, which I would argue are not Christians. Likewise, the lukewarmness and meandering of Protestantism, which really hasn't brought any fruits to it, in my opinion, not to be disrespectful to people.

Speaker 5Um, but I want to make the argument that God's morality is the only one that humanity can really rely on because man has proven himself time and time again to make the wrong decision constantly. Um, so I just want to kind of put that out there again, no disrespect to Escanor, Escanor or, um, Ian, but you know, the Greeks did a lot of great things, but they, they also had some messed up stuff and that doesn't negate that they were a great culture that brought us like concepts like freedom and democracy, um,

Speaker 5But if you read somebody like, I don't know if you've ever heard of Diogenes, who was a Greek philosopher. This guy used to live out in the streets, right? Like in his own filth. He's quite hilarious with Alexander. Yeah, yeah. He's like the original conundrum, or comradion, if you will. But anyway, so just putting that out there. Me personally, you know, this decision is always up to all of you, but the Catholic Church, despite what you might think, has been around for thousands of years and is the number one enemy of the people we are fighting today.

Speaker 5They always have been. And if you look at any of the writings of the old saints or many of the popes, they have been nothing but trying to literally save humanity from these people since the dawn of time and are their greatest adversary. So that's all I wanted to say. Thank you very much. Do you agree that Pope Marie was... Can I say something really funny about phylogenies? Go ahead. Go for it, Asgore. Yeah, look, it's a really short story, but it's just pretty funny to put you in the mind of a fucking cynic madman, right?

Speaker 4So this guy is a philosopher. He was basically living out of a fucking wine barrel. Like, when I mean, like, monk status, like, this guy had nothing. Like, one pair of underwear maybe type of dude, right? And it's funny because when Alexander was dying, he asked him, if you were to be born again, who would you want to come back as? And he said, as Diogenes. And the reason why is because when he visited, when Alexander visited Athens after whatever conquest,

Speaker 4He wanted to go see Diogenes, right? So he found him, and he stands in front of him. He's like, I've heard so much good about you that I'm willing to offer you any gift you ask for right now. Just tell me what you want, and I will grant it. You know what the fuck he told him? He told him, get the fuck out of the way. You're blocking the sun. That's what he told him. Oh, my God. It's like, this guy's really funny.

Speaker 3Yeah, he is wonderful to read, by the way. I feel like this is the original Escanor in its own way. That's funny. I just wanted to ask St. Fury, do you think that the potpourri got corrupted in the 1900s and it's become a shadow of what it was? Yeah, Vatican II and all that kind of stuff. Yeah, in a sense, but I also think if you want to have true faith in God...

Speaker 5you understand that God sometimes does things that we may not agree with, understand, and or like, but your faith and your discipline and your subservience to God is really what you need to do. And if you look at the track line, the timeline of the church, I think they're batting, they're doing pretty well compared to the rest of humanity personally, despite some of the things that you see, which you will find in literally any other context, culture, group, or people.

Speaker 3Yeah, well, it's all like any group that was white-based and had good morality. If you look at the Greeks and the Christianity, if you look at the maturity that it gave to the white people as a collective, together it's good, but when it's divided in all the dem issues, because they divided us in so many ways and so many times by very, very...

Speaker 3specific attacks on our beliefs morals and it caused a lot of degeneracy degeneracy but i agree with you like i'm a catalytic i was baptized in croatia my ancestors fought the muslims for i don't know how long to not let them invade europe basically because it was one of the only pathways so

Speaker 4If I had to choose, I would go with Christianity too. Well, the first version of Christianity was Greek Orthodox. Catholicism was the second. This is why I said earlier that it was more prevalent in the Western Roman Empire as opposed to the Byzantines, because it's not exactly the same Christianity that was spread at first. But yeah, that's another topic altogether.

Ian MalcolmAnd Eskenor, we're going to have to do a space and get a couple minds together to go into the Byzantine Empire. And I say that because what's wild for anybody that doesn't believe these statistics, if you just ask the longest standing empire of the modern era, and it's the Byzantines, and then you ask what was the role of Jews in the Byzantine Empire, they were essentially completely banished and forbid from holding any and all positions of significance, including, and it specifically called this out, which I thought was very curious,

Ian Malcolmin particular those of politics and academia, so completely removed from any educational role. And it did have an—and everybody can go run this if they don't believe what I'm saying. It said it did have a carve-out, which is very curious, for essentially the treasurer, which it said that they could sometimes hold or would be in charge of selecting the non-Jew to hold that position, which I thought was very curious. So the most successful and prominent—

Ian Malcolmlet's say, empire that for whatever reason is also largely obscured from a lot of traditional history books and academia in the Western world, also happens to be one that was like, and if I'm not mistaken, for over a thousand years was like, nope, no Jews. We're not cool with that. It's pretty wild to think about. It's the modern Greek empire. The Byzantine empire is the modern reflection of a Christian Athenian society. Basically, it's the same wing going forward.

Speaker 4And then there's the left wing, which was the Holy Roman Empire on the left. But, you know, it's the two-headed eagle, right, that has one body. So they're both under one crown, if you look at the symbolism. But they're kind of opposed to each other. So one's anti-Jew, one's fucking sucking Israel dick. Are they both involved in the same deception? Another question, right? Yeah, no, very well.

Ian MalcolmAnd very Eskenor-like in the delivery there. So very well stated. But with that being said, I know a lot of other hands. I know that Goy wanted to jump in. Yes, sorry about that. I'll shut up. No, no. And Eskenor, let me send you a co-host invite. Feel free at any point to jump in on any of the comments made, my friend. Always a pleasure to have you here. Let's go to that Goy and see what he's got going on. Ian, thank you. I've been waiting for a while. I know I messaged you as well.

Speaker 6Look, your opening statement, right? I, as a Muslim and a brown guy, should be offended by it. I'm not, to be honest with you. You know, you have every fucking right to protect and defend your race, right? So I am not offended by it. I landed in New York City August 18th, 1996. 30 fucking years ago, right? And New York is not the same as it used to be. This unplanned immigration that Biden did, he should be in fucking jail, to be honest with you. Like my kids, school became hotel. This is exactly what happened here in New York, right? And I was jobless maybe nine days, first nine days when I landed here, right? I have been working since.

Speaker 6paying my taxes, doing everything by the book. So go ahead, defend your color, your race. There's nothing wrong with that. The last thing I want to share, Ian, with you is, have you listened to, what's that guy's name? The ADL head. Jonathan Greenblatt and his recent comments on the FBI, which is just, it's everything that we've been saying for a long time and we're crazy for. Exactly. So we have bigger fish to fucking, you know, fry. Keith is sitting down there. Ian, you hold awesome spaces. Keith holds awesome spaces. We have to come together. The fight is against these motherfucking Jews. You know what he's saying?

Speaker 6He's saying that anybody who criticizes Jews and Israel, we have FBI tracking them. FBI, our own agency, is tracking them, right? And they're not even hiding it anymore. So get the fuck out of here, man. Like, come together, defend each other, and we'll have these fights maybe later on, but... The fucking people that are after us, after humanity, is these Jews. And we're going to have to hold hands. Even if you don't like it, if you don't like my brown hand, we're going to have to hold hands and fight this fight. I'm telling you. Over to you. Yeah, no, I'll tell you. It's something I've been saying for a long time, and it's very curious because the...

Ian MalcolmThe same people that are very upset by that type of rhetoric, in spite of the fact that I genuinely believe it's very easy to demonstrate that that is the right approach of the moment, which is to just deal with the primary problem, right? The very people that hold a lot of angst towards me saying that are the ones that then devolved into spaces where instead of race, let's say, I don't want to call it hatred, but let's say racial animus,

Ian MalcolmInstead, all of a sudden, it was Christian animus. Jesus Christ is a LARP. Don't believe it. Don't get in line with it. Don't support it. Don't do any of those things. Hate on anybody that's a Christian. What does that sound like to you? It sounds like somebody that's perpetuating division, distraction, and the devolution of the movement that we're trying to create, which is bringing attention to the primary issue. And so, go ahead. That was weird. That was weird. It was totally predictable.

Speaker 3It was predictable. I knew it was coming. But Indy tried to manipulate Christians into saying, oh, no, no, you have to say race first before Christianity. And I was like, that's the same thing. To me, it has nothing to do. My grandfather, when he joined the National Socialists in Croatia during World War II, was not, what's your beliefs? It was like, are you Croatian? Do you want to fight communism?

Speaker 3good you're a national socialist now it all these divisions and ideologies and little squabbles about it becomes narcissistic egos that are trying to fish for an audience it's not someone that's trying to to help anyone but themselves and it's annoying because they get a lot more views

Ian MalcolmWell, I'd challenge that because the thing that's so curious, and I say this as kind of, I guess, a backhanded remark, which is those very people that said to me not all that long ago, you'll never be able to build any kind of audience or coalition just talking about this central problem. And here we are with some of the more relevant spaces on this application and holding some of the biggest panels and audiences on X.

Ian MalcolmAnd the people that are doing that same stuff, they are, again, devolving into teeny tiny echo chambers that nobody cares about and that make no real impact on the overarching zeitgeist, arguably with the exception of getting certain states to pass laws that make it even more difficult to have these conversations. You might almost say that they are very antagonistic towards our very goals and efforts, which would, again, make you question kind of their intentions. Well, I don't know. I don't know.

Speaker 3I don't like any guys that suck telling me what to do or what's the benchmark or how to divide people or what I should be labeled at. Like, you suck. You're the team. Shut the fuck up and sit down. Let me do what I'm doing and just get the fuck out of the way. Who are these people? It's weird. It's weird. They label. They try to. They're trying to fight a common goal, but they want to be label and label people. It doesn't work when you're trying to unite people together, in my opinion.

Ian MalcolmWell, and again, it's why I would ask or question the intentions there. And I just, anybody who suggests that something is their North Star, in this case, it was race for those individuals. And then the very next day is willing to say, actually, I don't care about that at all. Instead, I care about being antagonistic towards this other thing. And I'm willing to do that with anybody of any race. It's like, wait, what just happened? How sincere were you yesterday? And how sincere are you today? Because I can't presume you're sincere for 100% of those days.

Speaker 4It's all about intentions, dude. Because everybody could lie saying the truth. And the best lies are usually presented with 100% truth. It's your intentions behind them that matter. That's why when I think somebody is a deceiver, I don't give a fuck what he says. I don't care if he says exactly the same thing that I'm thinking right now. He's a deceiver. I discard him altogether. Garbage. Yeah, no, absolutely. And that's why what I would say is the most important thing on this application to look for, I think, is just the consistency.

Ian Malcolmof people's message. Because if it shifts with the winds, and this doesn't matter if it's a small handle or all the way up to Fuentes, who seemingly was very concerned about Trump, then he wasn't. Now he's celebrating the idea of the Insurrection Act, which we're going to have to come back to and get Eskenor's thoughts on. Because I find that just to be a wildly obvious booby trap for all of us that are trying to get to the truth. But maybe that's just my perspective on it.

Speaker 3And Eskenor, I'm not sure if you want to add a couple words on that, or if not, we'll go down to Truthseeker. Can I say just diminishing the thing about the pedophilia and the Epstein files by Nick Fuentes needs to be discussed, at least to a certain extent, because that was weird. Look, Fuentes, I called this motherfucker out like a year ago. At least everybody was up my ass saying I'm crazy. It's interesting.

Speaker 4No, I know the patterns, right? But it's always these beta virgin faggot homos in the closet that are pushing for these draconian manly measures. Like, oh, boots on the ground that tick their ass. Well, you're a pussy. Stay the fuck seated. You're 100 pounds wet. Shut the fuck up. They have the most beta effeminate loser toxic males repping our image, dude.

Speaker 4Because he fucking talked shit about Israel. What the fuck about none of that? He fed Ali Alexander children. He's part of the fucking networks. He's part of the whole thing. He was lying to you from when he said hello. The first hello he ever said online was a lie. The whole thing has been seeded. He's been controlled from every second. He didn't turn on anybody. He was doing exactly what he was supposed to do from the beginning. All of them. They're all gay. They're all homo.

Speaker 4They're all gay. They're all homo. They're all compromised. They're bred this way. They were compromised, you know, from youth being part of circles that they were the ritual abuse victim. And now they're just a talking head. They just evolved in the hierarchy of mind control. Yeah. All garbage. Yeah, and they all started at the same fucking time on YouTube. Lauren Sutton, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, Ben Shapiro, Ethan Ralph, who was there. There was a...

Speaker 3a bunch of other, how was he? Bacon Alaska. All of them, Milo was, and Larry Loomer, because that's a goddamn dude. There's pictures of him. Like, this is just a theater. What did you have in Rome to occupy the people from the shit that was going on behind their backs? Theater and games. Same ideology. It works.

Speaker 7Yeah, no, very well stated, Machiavelli. Let's go down to Truthseeker, and then we're going to check in with Tom. Hey, what's going on, Ian? Long time no talk, brother. Eskenar, man, how you doing, brother, man? As always, you know, man, you're my dude. You always be speaking the truth. You always be coming locked and loaded with the truth. It's always a bigger pill to swallow when you talk, man. But, yeah, what's going on, everybody, man? And I've been enjoying this space. It's pretty fire. I see my boy Keef down there, too, man. Hopefully, y'all can bring him up at some point if he wants to talk.

Speaker 7But anyways, what I wanted to talk about was, you know, pretty much the same talking points like what you all have been talking about, man. They want everybody divided, you know. That's what it boils down to. That's why they use political theater. That's why they use this. stuff with the Jews and everything else. They want everybody divided because it's all about their goal, which is order out of chaos to establish their New World Order. And this is why you even have the Canadian dude coming out now talking about New World Order. This is why you even had somebody talking on behalf of Trump just the other day talking about the New World Order. This is why you have Trump...

Speaker 7giving keynotes at davos i mean they are telling you without telling you what's coming i mean trump has multiple times been at davos and there's a reason because he is part of the club they could say oh he's going there to you know talk against the you know system no he's not he's part of it he's literally one on record and said klaus

Speaker 7Schwab is doing a good job. And then it even boils down to all of these talking heads like you was talking about, Nick Fuentes, Alex Jones, and all these people. They're nothing but a bunch of puppets designed to be put in the place, and Candace Owens included. I mean, looking into who she's married with. I mean, all of these people are all the same, man. They are just playing different sides of the field. They're a bunch of sheep put in the place. And if one of us were to talk about certain groups the way these people do...

Speaker 7We get shadow banned, we get blacklisted, or we get banned entirely off of these platforms. But these people can freely talk about certain things that we can't because they are agents of chaos. And that's where I want to land the plane. I'll let other people talk. I might come back and say some more stuff later. If I have some more stuff on my mind, I appreciate you for letting me come up. But yeah, man, it's just bullcrap, man. This stuff is so divisive. And one more thing.

Speaker 7It's like what the Bible says. They are the synagogue of Satan. They are the fake ones, you know, the fake ones. So this is why Christianity is so heavily attacked. And this is why they're saying, oh, we're going to come after anybody and everybody who speaks out against, you know, our group because this all boils down to the persecution of the church that's coming that Christ has talked about. And this is where we are at. This is going to be leading to the beheadings and everything else. And it's going to be in the name of anti-Semitism. Guarantee it.

Ian MalcolmYeah, and it sounds so crazy. And again, this is one of those things why they want to pervert history and destroy the truth. Because when you say that, your average person will think that sounds crazy. And then you look into the past and you realize these exact same playbooks have been rolled out over and over again. And you could compare Q to Operation Trust. We could compare the calls from Jonathan Greenblatt to those pushed by the Bolsheviks, right? So it's the same thing. And it really is wild when you start to recognize those patterns.

Ian MalcolmAnd it's even more concerning when you start to look at where those patterns led, right, with the mass execution and genocide of tons and tons of people by that very political apparatus. So really well stated there, Truthseeker. And with that, let's go. I think we said that we would go to Tom next, if I'm not mistaken. And then we will check in with Mr. Mattywack. Hey, how's everyone doing? I hope everyone's finding themselves well today. About a couple of things that I heard that I want to chime in on just briefly.

Speaker 8about what Ian said regarding a selfish society a little while ago. A society in which nobody or few are selfless is really nothing more than a fragile house of cards waiting to fall apart from the slightest breeze. And what worries me about that in particular is that we all know that the wondrous people running the West right now are working tirelessly to engineer a collapse of multiple critical systems in our society. So if you guys can just use your imagination and think about

Speaker 8what a catastrophic collapse would result in, in a selfless society versus a selfish one, in my opinion, one is kind of free to be taken over by the weakest malign actor that want to fill the void after the chaos. The other one, who's that? Player one. Right, bud? Yeah, but please don't interrupt her. Thank you. My bad, my bad. I thought he was messing around. My bad. So,

Speaker 8cool bro if you could mute your mic i'd appreciate it because i'm reading off notes and it's hard to make it sound extemporaneous bro thanks bro i got you anyway um thanks so about what about what eskimos in the other one look and in the other case a society that that is that is uh what's the term i was using selfless when things collapse a self society especially if it's somewhat homogeneous or if there's some compatible values among different members of the society will automatically

Speaker 8reinvent itself, find a way to recover from the damage done, and flourish again. And they're rigging things on every critical level imaginable to make that result impossible. I see this as a very deliberate effort to collapse the West, and I think that's what we're... looking at potentially happening if we don't manage to awaken enough people to the fact that they need to turn back to morality they need to turn back to decency and just reject all the trash look you're not talking to a saint here by the way guys it's just that you know the past few years you know really woke me up to how important it was to just do everything on the up and up and i was always someone that did everything on the up and up when it came to interpersonal relationships and you know not screwing people over and things like that but i had a lot of problems that i recognized as being things that i had to kind of

Speaker 8flush out of the system so to speak and covet really was a major wake-up call uh it really caused me to realize holy cow everyone walking the face of the earth right now is a victim of this absolutely horrible situation i have to look at them as victims instead of an annoyance i'm walking in the streets and i get in my way you know i used to be like that but kovid made me realize to be much more patient

Speaker 8Because as hard as COVID was for me, it didn't wreck me and it ruined a hell of a lot of people psychologically. The mandates were meant to really screw people up. But anyway, let me continue with the other two points I wanted to touch on about what Eskenor said regarding creating big parasites deliberately, that the system, that society is deliberately creating parasites 100%. But I think it's worse than that. They're literally engineering a society of predators that display sociopathic behaviors.

Speaker 8etc. play video games that are extremely violent and are often taught no morality, just trust the science. So that's not going to lead to anything good. And really quickly about what Machiavelli said. I really enjoyed his testimony. I thought it was excellent. But there's no question that there are very sophisticated systems in place in Europe and more so, I think, in the United States meant to identify extremely high IQ future troublemakers to the machine and get them on ADHD medications, which at least in many cases are just methamphetamines. Even more

Speaker 8damaging them the meth i believe is the process of waging irregular warfare via psychology on the same kids they want on ritalin by subjecting them to endless exposure to systems that are that actually rewire the subconscious mind and rig things to the point that they question their own genius or greatness for the rest of their lives yeah go ahead brother it was in quebec so if you look at canada at the moment there's made

Speaker 3It's a system that you can apply if you're depressed and you can get killed. And out of 20 people that I grew up with, 10 of them committed suicide. It's like people don't understand. People are like, oh, yeah, 51%. It's like if 51% good, it's the trans and black. No, no, no, no, no. It's the normal guys that commit suicide that are pushed into.

Speaker 3depression because they said that they're bad. Everything about what they tried to do to help me was to actually make me want to kill myself. It's exactly that. Machiavelli, you're from Quebec, aren't you? I can tell by your accent. Yep. Machiavelli, do you know how many people they killed last year with MAID? 400, I think, more than that. 16,500.

Ian MalcolmYeah, Keith, and I never made a post on this one, but I was shocked. If you look at the totality of deaths that are either government-assisted suicide or non-government-assisted suicide or are a result of drug overdoses, either through alcohol or drugs, hard drugs themselves, it goes up to almost one in every 10 Americans. I'm sorry, Canadians. I was dying as a result of those things.

Speaker 4So listen, I had a death in the family, a couple actually, but let's say last month I had one. And listen, it's so prevalent, this problem, that a friend of the family was dying and he wanted assisted suicide because he was going through a lot of pain. And the waiting list was three weeks, which outpaced his death. There were so many people that the government is, you know, euthanizing, let's say, less than kosher. Let's just say that.

Speaker 9So the lineup is so big that people that are actually requesting it are not getting it. So they're giving it to people that shouldn't be getting it. And the people that are requesting it are not getting it because they've got to go wait and die before it happens. So it's really fucked. Yeah, it just threw something in the pill because Ronan the other day was like, so, I mean, if you have cancer and you're about to die, I get it. And I don't blame him for thinking that. But I'm like, no, they put people down. Like, again, I just put in the pill six days ago. State-sanctioned murder in Canada. Healthy 26-year-old euthanized for depression.

Speaker 3Just dead. Yep. And I tried to my French Canadian mother. Okay. I'm trying to tell her this. She doesn't even know about it. It's nowhere on the news. I'm like, mom, I could apply with my issues, with my mental issues that they gave me. That's why they made this for me to apply mom. And she's like, no, it's impossible. I don't believe it. So you understand what type of society they created. It's, it's fundamentally living.

Ian MalcolmIf you're aware like me, like in a place where it's all zombies and they don't know anything about anything, it's very freaky indeed. And it's just the disregard for life at this point. And that's why, you know, I kind of zoom out and I look at things and try to understand why would any society revel in normalizing these realities? And then the only conclusion you can ultimately arrive at is that they're essentially being destroyed.

Speaker 4if not effectively. Sorry to cut you off, but again, it's exactly like the subject of this piece is. They're using emotionally driven thoughts to push death and fucking destruction, brother. They're using all of these ideals that sound good philosophically on paper, and then when they actually roll it out, they're just fucking killing everybody, and people that are requesting it don't get it. The exact fucking opposite of all the bullshit you roll down to coerce people

Speaker 4emotionally to accept this. It was all a lie. It was all bait. It's like everything always is. They always push it through ways that they strain your heart in a way that you're like, yeah, I have to. It's to save the kids. It's to do this, to do that. No, it's for the opposite of all that. The exact opposite of what the fuck you think is going to happen is going to happen as a result of this.

Speaker 4when they declare the insurrection act, it's not going to be to save us and remove the illegals. Yeah, bro. Exactly. Like what? Like I just threw in the nest. Elon's calling for it. Like, you know, I feel like I took a time machine and I'm back in fucking 2016 where China, China, like what the, like what, what the fuck? The last 10 years, this one down the tubes in two seconds. Cause the IDF train ice agents going around people sharing at them. And I'm like, dude, they're going to just come pick you next.

Speaker 7Like you said with the ICE agents, too, how they're saying they're going to go door-to-door. Let's not forget that, man. That's all tying together. That's why they're calling for the insurrection act and everything, man. If people can't see what is coming next, what more can we really say at this point? I mean, it's quite obvious where this is heading, and it's actually really scary where all of this is about to be heading. I mean, think about it, man. Your freedom that you've known for all your life,

Speaker 7It's about to become less free than ever before because we are slowly, actually not even slowly, rapidly becoming a police state. And this is why you see ICE doing what they're doing, Trump deploying national guards in certain cities, and now they're talking about ICE going door to door in the name of illegal immigration. Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure. Keep telling yourself that.

Speaker 9I'll shut up, but it's just Escanor nailed it, as always, months ago. The biggest problem is with these influencers like Fuentes. Number one, he has a legit cult following. Like, literally, a cult following. And they fuck you at the most important times, like Escanor has said. He's literally, in the last three days, said that 14, 15-year-olds, not pedophilia. He doubled down on it last night and said, we need to destroy...

Speaker 9Anyone on the left can do whatever they want. I set no conditions for them. Calling for the insurrection act on Alex Jones like Ian was talking about last night. And literally saying, Mr. Christian, that Renee Goode deserved it and he's happy that she got murdered because she's a blue-haired liberal and she wouldn't put a piss on you if you were on fire or something like that. But these cult-like followings, man, it's...

Speaker 4Once you see it now, it's crazy to understand what it really means. It's so fucking dangerous. He's just like Trump. He could murder somebody. He made people pledge to rape in his name, bro. I have a really fucked up twisted sense of humor. Really fucked. This is fucking retarded. Who does that? To rape in my name? If somebody does that, I'll fucking kill you first. It's not happening. Nobody should talk like that, bro.

Speaker 4To push it further, look how... I can't believe people are following. And they're still sticking their fucking heels in the ground, which is crazy. They're literally... It's like the Q guys. They're all putting their... Everything. They're putting it on these ideals, this plan, that they can't even articulate. They have no idea what the fucking plan is. What's the plan? How sincere do you feel that that following is? And what I mean by that is...

Ian MalcolmWe obviously know that there's lots of bots on this application. I think there's lots of AI nonsense that's thrown to either critique people like us or to celebrate people like Ben Shapiro. I'm curious how sincere, authentic, and organic of the roughly 100% of the potential pie you think the audience is that is going to just swallow everything and anything that comes out of that quote-unquote cult.

Ian MalcolmRight, so you're talking about Fuentes, that's a great question. Specifically, yeah, that whole movement. And I say it only because there's so many accounts that just seem like all they do is just repost, repost, repost, repost, repost. And I know that he has a fan base, but some of it just looks...

Speaker 7as astroturfed as some of the Zionist shills that we would otherwise point fingers at often. Hey, Ian, sorry to interrupt. Hey, man, that cult, I think it's as deep as it looks because even the Trump cult is so deep, dude. There have been people that still support Trump. I've tried to wake them up, and they refuse... to criticize trump no matter what they're like oh no that's just an ai video that's out there of trump you know saying that or whatever like i even showed somebody the uh thing at mar-a-lago with the uh masks they were wearing and they're like oh that's probably just an ai video so i mean i think the cult mentality runs deep it really does man it's it's the freemason ideology of like when you go to a certain step you're it's like a pyramid where you go

Speaker 3One step over the other step. And when you get to a certain level, you have to do things to stay at that level and go to the next one. But then it's not little steps. It's big steps. Like you have to sacrifice things. You have to do things. You have to, you know, get blackmail on yourself. That's how they work. You know, nothing is free. The ideology of staying free, no.

Speaker 4It's everything has a cost. And for them, it's exponential. So I'll say something on this. So, you know, Q, Fuentes, Trump cycle fans, there's more continuity between them than you'd think. And it's from small things like the frog cult of Keck. You know, there's, when you look at them from a higher perspective, you're like, huh, it's interesting that they're aligning the way the fuck they're aligning, right? So,

Speaker 4The Q fucking psychopaths, they don't know what the fucking plan that they're betting their family on is. They have no idea what the fucking plan is. But I could tell you the blueprint to the plan and you could figure it out for yourself. It's very simple, guys. If the parasitic controller's plan is to completely control us, boots on the ground, door to door, take people's weapons, if that's the idea, then the plan of Q

Speaker 4is to make all these fucking retards endorse every pillar necessary and every step necessary to bring this to fruition. They're going to endorse National Guard going into the fucking states. They're going to start endorsing people going door to door. They're going to start endorsing the very things needed to take your freedoms away. That's the fucking plan. It's as simple as that. It's not complicated. Do you think this is a humiliation ritual, Escanor? I just put it in the pill. So he doubled down last night. Fuentes said, Nick...

Speaker 9Fuentes says Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile, stating that Epstein's victims were between 14 and 17 years old, and that, in his view, this does not qualify as pedophilia. He says that after age 14, individuals are biologically past sexual maturity. Fuentes also says the cops' concept of an age of consent is relatively new, claiming it's been pushed by feminists about 30 years ago. He's been 100% faggot in all the shit that you've talked about, but this week, it seems like it's some type of ritual to get to another level, but...

Speaker 4either way. It's all of that and more, but they're also, they're gauging responses and how people are reacting to what he's saying. You know, is this time-laced clutching to his balls or are they starting to fucking pull back? And they're studying this metric. That's what the fuck they're doing with all of these fucking retards. And they're putting everybody in classes. They're like, look, we need influencers for these IQ classes for these types of people. And then they start seeding them to capture,

Speaker 4individual groups within the frequency of all these tie-offs. I know it's hard to visualize that, but that's what the fuck they're doing.

Speaker 7Yeah, it's also about dumbing down the masses. I didn't mean to interrupt. It's also about dumbing down the masses, man. And like seeing, oh, who's going to go along with the plan still? We could say the most off the wall thing, you know, like pedophilia, but then we're going to say, oh, you know, this is, you know, true or that's true. You know, it's just the blurring of lines and the fact that Fuentes claims he's a Christian on top of that. And then saying the stuff that he says is truly, truly mockery. And, you know, it gives true Christians a bad name because that dude is the furthest thing from a Christian

Speaker 7Same goes for alex jones all these people are telling you without telling you exactly who they are They they literally do these things Behind the scenes closed doors and they're just you know, quote unquote joking about it because there's always truth And these jokes that these people say but believe them when they tell you because they are telling you up front It's more than just a humiliation ritual. It is a ritual

Speaker 7But they're telling you exactly who they are, Trump included, because there have been multiple clips out there of Trump, you know, talking weird about his daughter or younger people. I mean, they are telling you without telling you what they're about. They are a bunch of fetters. He's got a nice rack. Yep. And Eskenor is spot on again. I don't mean to always gag him as shit, but, like, Lindsay clipped it the other day, talking about how he says Christian nationalism needs to be at its highest for the Jews and times prophecy. And then you get people like Peter Thiel, a quote-unquote Christian, like you said.

Speaker 9Alex Jones, Tucker, all these people and stuff, and Fuentes pushing this thing. It's very obvious to see, to be honest, once you see it. And I agree with what Esnort said. Did you see how far can we push these people? Like, Roy was literally defending this. They're literally saying it's okay. He's saying a 15-year-old. Keep it simple. Watch the video that I put in the purple pill. If at the end of the video you're like, oh, there's nothing gay about that, then you should question your fucking sexual orientation immediately.

Speaker 3Watch the video and shut the fuck up. Little joke, okay? Catboy Cammy was the guy that Nick Fuentes got caught being all nice and sweet and gay with him. It was his first kiss. Catboy Cammy said Nick was his first kiss. Yes, but listen. Catboy Cammy got married and has children. He used the money out of that to make a family and now he's just living a normal life.

Speaker 3But Nick Fuentes is never going to get married. He was made in a vial. He's a test tube, baby. I'm always a fan of conspiracy theories, but that's one of the ones I'm going to have to ask for some kind of substantiation. I can't tell if it was hyperbole or not. He means Nick Fuentes was conceived on Epstein Island. I'm sure if you measure his asshole diameter now, it's much larger than earlier. No, no, but you can't have artificial insemination when you have pregnancy issues and stuff like that. So he was kind of made in a tube. Wait, wait, but hang on. We got to be very specific because there's always going to be people looking to discredit the conversations that we have because they're kind of far out there. And so we got to be really careful when we say people are lizard people like David Icke or that they were...

Ian Malcolmyou know, created in a laboratory. It's just a pretty outlandish statement. Yeah, but you can't say that. You can say that he's a closet, tiger, virgin, homo. That's true. Escanor, I don't know where you just subjected me to, but good lord, I just watched it. Like, Escanor, that seems like something you could substantiate with some reason and some proofs behind it, which is why I won't challenge that one, but...

Speaker 3But he's a test tube baby he's created in a lab on Epstein Island. No, not on Epstein Island, but in a medical fucking lab. How did you know, though? What is your evidence? I'm going to find it, but it's been following Nick Fuentes for 10 years.

Speaker 9fucking years. If you say it's a gay lab, then I'll believe it a little bit more. I think it's one of the things that matters, but it doesn't matter. I mean, literally, this shit in the nest, like, again, before Esmer said, the motto is rape, kill, die for Nick J. Fuentes. Like, that is a fucking cult. Regardless, he is a homo. Regardless, he is a homo.

Speaker 9I mean, regardless, it's unbelievable. But he's going to turn just like someone said at the beginning of my space. I forget who it was. They nailed it. Or their prediction, I think, is right. They said that he's going to go with Bannon because he's linked up with him recently. And when Bannon runs or whatever, Bannon's going to drop out. And then Fuentes is going to endorse J.D. Vance. And I can see that coming because Fuentes has laid the groundwork for it. He says, if J.D. Vance comes out as anti-Israel, then I might tell the Gropers to vote for him.

Ian MalcolmOkay, so he's not owned by Palantir? He's going to vote for J.D. Vance and support Peter Thiel's technocracy. And he's going to support Trump and the Insurrection Act. And it's like, come on, man. Palantir? If we even have any more elections. If we even have any more elections. But he calls out Israel. except when it's Charlie Kirk or when it really fucking matters. I'm curious because you always talk about the light and the dark and not in the Star Wars rendition, but I'm curious how much they are setting him up to be the cult leader that all the youth gets behind so they can then rug pull him and basically demoralize all of his followers into, you know, accepting whatever is to come from the machine because they're, you know, they're...

Speaker 3And it's the same thing in a way as when, speaking of Star Wars, anyone went and saw the new films and watched Luke Skywalker just be a giant pansy and watched Han Solo get murdered, right? You're watching your heroes get sacrificed in front of you. That's an emotional ramping up. That's exactly what shock and awe is. Shock and awe is that you use emotional ramping up of a society and you deceive them in a way that they all stay shocked.

Speaker 3But you do that one after the other until you have a kind of stunt or stunted society. Then you come with a big false flag like 9-11. So look what happened before 9-11. There was a bunch of things that happened before 9-11 that was demoralizing for the people. But I remember a little bit, but I know that it's far away, but it's still the same shock and awe.

Speaker 3I'm scared that what happened in Iran is just a ramping up. So they did the same thing. They ramp people up, third world war, nothing. So everyone's like, oh, so when the real war is going to start, people are going to be like just disarmed, totally emotionally drained to react. That's why we need to keep together and reminding each other.

Speaker 10When you say shit like this, like IVF baby and all that, it discredits the whole conversation that we had. You have to understand that he had a college newspaper and when these newspapers, they get plucked out of university, these types of people like Nick Fuentes. Let's not forget he was also Laura Loomer's friend. They made him in a way, they radicalized him in a way. So we have to remember this. We have to know that all the past three years...

Speaker 10We walked into it. So everything has been laid out and we're walking into it. So let's not say shit like this that discredits the whole combo that we have. That's all. And I would like to say something. If anybody's going to discredit this conversation, it's me, okay?

Speaker 9Yeah, yeah, don't be too hard on yourself. The Greek curmudgeons over there are like, if anybody's bringing the ship down, I'm doing it in glory. Dude, I'm still laughing at the face you guys did together. I wasn't bringing it down. I'm saying at least... No, no, he knows. With that guy, Adam, with Adam Eni, who's the best, and Eskenor's way of complimenting him is like, you're not a total dickhead, or something, I forget what it was. But I think you're right, Ian, except the only thing, I guess I would...

Speaker 9I don't even know if it's a disagreement on the rug pull, like you're saying with the Fuentes thing is there. I don't think these people will turn on him. And it, to that degree, I think it is like, how far can we push this? Like these people there, I saw it on the timeline all last night, all of his loyal followers, all of them literally defending. And then saying, you're out, you're clipping this out of context, blah, blah, blah. When he's saying 14 years old is totally fine. Like that ice, he's going to tell people to vote for Vance. Like it.

Speaker 3Dude, it's just wild. It's wild. How many of them are DIDF? We just had someone say not long ago that there was like, I don't know how much of IDF bots on this app. Well, imagine if... Nick has been compromised since the start. He has been. He has been. Listen, let me finish. He had his own... We also have a lot of fans and you kind of like jump in a little too much. Yeah, but just let me finish my point, okay? Since he started, it's always been the same thing. He was kicked out of YouTube, then he had his own little thing on the side.

Speaker 2he started to do the same thing, patterns all the time. That's all I'm saying. Let me add to that real quick. I put out a post about nine months to ten months ago about how to build a code. And they are...

Speaker 2directly following the schematic of how to prop up a cult as a psyop, right? And you see that with most of these influencers, right? Charlie Kirk is a very good example. I'm not sure why he's portrayed as a right-winger. He had like half of his talking points were super liberal and super leftist, right? Race is a social construct, stuff like that. So they prop up someone and portray him as based for their individual audience that he's tailored to. And then they will...

Speaker 2sprinkle in some ideologies that they want their audience to shift to. Right. And that's the same with Nick Fuentes. He has been kind of based this Catholic right winger bashing on Israel. But when it comes to the real critical points, he backs completely down. Right. So it's all a psyop. all of them every single one was propped up in a way you don't get to this kind of standing if you don't have any jewish backup right always keep that in mind there is no one out there that that is organically grown like that right not you're talking my language

Speaker 11Thank you so much, Emeritas. Godfrey is here. Hey, Godfrey, jump in. Go ahead. Hey, thank you. Thanks for hosting the space. Yeah, look, I'm just going to say something that needs to be said. The Groypers are fucking creepy. They'll defend Nick Fuentes to levels that are beyond cult-like, like defending the Tyler Robinson narrative and the Charlie Kirk shooting narrative.

Speaker 11And saying, because Nick says so, I agree with him. Like, never even using their own logic and reason. It's just, because Nick says so, equals true. It is an absolute cult. And I honestly think it's more culty than Q, when you look at it. Like, if you are following Nick Fuentes... after he's pushing the Tyler Robinson narrative, after he is defending pedophilia, I don't know what to tell you. This is Q-level insanity. And that's really where it's at. I'd like to add on to that. I love that language. You fucking retards. By the way, I still have no idea what the fuck a groiper is. What the fuck is that? I have no idea. It sounds like a grabbler.

Speaker 4or a fucking groiper, like you're groping women. This whole thing bothers me on every angle that I'm thinking of it, right? And I don't want to be the guy that says, I told you so, but I told you so. Nick Fuentes, I literally wrote, he's going to fuck you when it matters. That's exactly what the fuck I said, and that's what he's doing. On the biggest playoffs, he's just as useful as any Zionist chill tagger account. Like, Misfit Patriot...

Speaker 4And Nick Fuentes, when a tie-up happens, is the same shit. They're both saying the same shit all of a sudden. Like, what the fuck is going on, guys? So the cult-like following, yeah, to answer Keith, they're not going to rug-pull it, because why would you rug-pull a good fucking thing, right? These people will rape and pillage for you. You're going to use them to fucking shepherd the sheep into compliance with all of these draconian steps they apparently need to take to take us over, right? Like, I don't know if I believe in that narrative altogether, but...

Speaker 4Assuming that's the path forward. So yeah, Nick Fuentes, gay as fuck. They're all gay weirdos, guys. I don't know if you guys noticed that, but they're always like that. It's a pattern. It's because they've been ritually abused when young. And they're all fucked in the head. And you could tell the mannerisms. Just pay attention. All of them are super the fuck weirdos. There's no exception. Especially the most manly of them, like the Tates. Like Tate and Nick Fuentes...

Speaker 4Are the only two people? I could put them in a room full of chicks with fucking tits and they still look gay. That's not normal. That's not normal that that could happen. So, you know, take it as you will. And it's a problem, bro. You got probably 10 to 15, 20 million young people under the age of 25.

Speaker 9specifically in their teenage years, that listen to him like he is God. And I agree with God for you. It's worse than QAnon. Obviously, I had Patriot on the space at the end the other day. It was the first time I talked to him. I know Eskenor DM'd me after he was so upset. He said, damn, I miss him. I want to say hi to him. He's my guy. But I'll have him on another time for you, Eskenor. But either way, jokes aside, he like...

Speaker 9did admit, like, he gave some concessions. He's like, I can understand where you guys are coming from with your worries about Trump and this and that. And, like, he eventually at first, he said, no, the vaccines didn't kill anyone. They saved people, blah, blah, blah. But then he eventually opened up and he said, yeah, they have killed people and it's bad. So, like, even he's admitting, and he's fucking paid, but even he'll admit it a little bit. These grippers, man, there's nothing. There's absolutely nothing at all. Keith, I stand by my prediction that that that that

Speaker 10Yeah, real quick. I stand by my prediction that if we do have elections, that Nick Fuentes is going to be shilling for J.D. Vance as base J.D. Vance. Yep. To Justin's point about the Tates, guys, the same thing happened. It's the same playbook where he admitted recently, he said, you attack the Zog until the Zog gives you what you want. That's the new playbook, guys. They created an incel society, a group of young men

Speaker 10who are incels. It is the reality. Most goipers are incels. And it's not in their hands. It's something imposed on them. So they took all this pent-up anger and they created people like the Taits. This is the Tait blueprint, where you attack the Zog and you harness this youth to your advantage. And it's very dangerous. It is very dangerous. And when I was seeing it unfold, I was like, this is dangerous.

Speaker 10Either way, we're not going to win like people online. We are using their platform. Like Tate, he actually lied to you and said, oh, I did this multiple accounts thing and I defeated the platforms. No, they pushed you. They pushed you. You can't defeat them on their own platform. So let's not fall for this.

Speaker 1Did he cut off what it's made? Yeah, I think he does. It's so glitchy, guys. Well, in the meantime, guys, please post this space. It's in the, it's, I will post it again in the purple pill because we don't have, I mean, in the Jumbo Drum because we don't have purple pill because of how glitchy it is. Really? Follow Ian and Suresh and all the amazing speakers and thank you so much for being here. Okay, I think he's not coming back.

Speaker 7Hopefully he requests again. I had one more thing to add because I got to bounce too. I don't mean to interrupt. One more thing, man. What's up, Godfroy? If you're there, I don't know if that's you that bounced or not, Keith and everybody. One more thing I want to add. Nick Fuentes is a modern-day Jim Jones. That's what it all boils down to. Everyone's drinking the Kool-Aid. It doesn't matter what he says, what he does, or what he doesn't do. It's just a modern-day Jim Jones, and everybody's lining up like the good little sheep they are to drink the Kool-Aid.

Speaker 7I mean, it's just scary where we are at, man. But at the same time, it's also a, you know, wonderful time because we know that Christ is coming back. You know, Christ is king. So at the end of the day, man, just don't get too, you know, caught up in all this darkness, bullcrap going on, man. At the end of the day, we all just got to come together as the truthers that we are and to continue to do what we do for as long as we have left, man. But I do appreciate you all for letting me come up. Appreciate you, Ian, Firespace, and good stuff, Escanor. We're going to have to get together and do another episode

Speaker 9space sometime this week, Keith. Yeah, bro, I appreciate y'all, man. Y'all take care. God bless y'all. Eskenor, do you think anyone's legit? Obviously, the people that are high. The only one I think is possible is Owen Schroer. What do you think? I said no before you finished your fucking thing. There. I'll still hold out hope for Owen a little bit. Listen to me. It's not complicated. The only difference between me and most people is that I've accepted

Speaker 4After seeing fucking countless of my heroes turn to villains over and over. Fuck over again. And fuck me in the beginning. Fuck me at the end. Fuck me when it matters. Fuck me when it doesn't matter. Fuck me here. Fuck me there. You know, at some point, you know, after getting fucked over and over and over, I accepted it, man. Nah, I agree 100%. The only difference. And then I'm like, fuck. Okay. Maybe. Maybe. The next guy's going to fuck me. Maybe.

Speaker 4after every other person has, consistently, every single one, no exception. Like, guys, hello? It's all of them. If they're on TV, if you could take their picture or their name and say it to, like, 100 people random in the street, and, like, fucking 20 of them know their name, it's over. The shoe fits. Compromiser will be. It's over. Just bullshit. And the story, it's not complicated. There's no magic wand.

Speaker 4There's no fucking secret database I have. I'm not using any OSINT software, none of that. It's just all of them. You just don't mind being a dickhead. No, time proves me right consistently forever. That's why me and Ian are cool now because he saw like, I call that a lot of people that, you know, I want to say he's friends with, but like he was obviously much more friendly than I was with. And over time, he's like, yeah, you know what? You're fucking right. And that's what it is. Time proves it. They're all assholes every single time. No exception.

Speaker 10I think Vic is back. Go ahead, Vic, and then we'll go to Richie. Sorry, guys. I don't know what's happening today with that. Yeah, I dropped you because you went completely quiet, but I sent you a link. Thank you. Where did I stop, if you remember by any chance? Sorry. Yeah, harnessing. You were saying the 1979 regime change was 100% organic. Just kidding.

Speaker 10Some people disagree, man. They don't like this point. We had that conversation again today. It was another heated one. Whether you like it or not. You're either an employee or you're made to be an employee because you are reactionary. If we're being reactionary, we're always going to lose. They're going to find a way to harness our reaction. This is what's happening with Nick too. What I'm afraid of is when we see these young men

Speaker 10grow up with this uh person and take arms that's what's really gonna be uh scary because i knew someone who worked at honeywell who worked at raytheon uh 15 years back and he was talking about these drones that are going to be utilized in a civil war imagine 15 years back he was talking about this and yeah so it's going to be it's sketchy it's very sketchy because this base like they're young but they're growing up and it's it's going to be scary thank you guys

Speaker 1Thank you so much, Vic. And it is scary, but I think we're going to win because of people like Ian, and it's going to run amazing speakers. So I do have hope. Ciao, soundboards. Bye-bye. Good Lord. Okay. Richie, welcome. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you. I think there's a lot of people here before me, but obviously I'm jumping the line, but I appreciate that.

Speaker 12I didn't hear the beginning of the conversation, but I just wanted to just give you my point of view in regards to who Nick Fuentes is and his personality. Obviously, this young man is very erudite. He's very educated. He's a great speaker. He's a very influential person. That's beyond reproach. He has a lot of interesting things to say.

Speaker 12A lot of very interesting analysis of current affairs. However, however, I think he has to be obviously taken with a degree of caution. His background is... Sorry, go ahead. No, I just said you think. Oh, yeah, of course, of course. I just think what was very interesting... What is very interesting in his recent generational run, as he likes to describe it as, is his now connection with Alex Jones. I'm probably older than most of you in my late 40s. I've been sort of aware of what's been taking place probably for maybe the last 20 years. A lot of people have just came to terms with this.

Speaker 12I'm not saying that I know more, but I know longer than most people have. Now, most people, especially Ian Malcolm, the host here, has definitely done a lot of great work. I especially like his work, picking down about David Zee and Gemma Yagoda, because he was fucking up our Irish spaces for a long time. So hats off to yourself in that regard.

Speaker 12But just the fact that Nick Fuentes is now, he's part of the InfoWars alignment in which everyone who is, maybe Alex Jones was a gateway, but most people realize that Alex Jones is actually a distraction. And he's literally pushing people in different directions with talking to chatons. Everyone knows this at this stage, but now when Nick gets a...

Speaker 12an invite to the InfoWars platform. Obviously, he embraces it because it promotes him. It gives him an audience that he didn't once get. So, yeah. He's not. Richie, he offered his daughter's hand in marriage. Forget the platform, man. Alex Jones is now saying to Nick, marry my daughter. That's what he's saying. Forget the platform. Well, I haven't saw that. I'm not up to date with the current event, essentially. But I just am aware that he's now part of the team. And as someone said, Owen Schreier is now out of the team.

Speaker 12So maybe Owen Troyer is somebody that could potentially be one of our guys that is prepared to go all the way and focus on the true cause of the problem. I think Nick in himself is now obviously talking about, you know, Jewish power and Jewish influence, which is essentially a good thing in itself. but whether or not he is prepared to, you know, is he literally going to try and divert people in a different direction? Okay, let me push back. What has noticing done to you, if it's a good thing? We're noticed. We notice now. What has it done for us?

Speaker 12I think Richie missed the last couple days, the pedophilia stuff. Oh, I understand. I saw somebody saying something about the pedophilia stuff with Epstein. Is he now saying this is like... He said 14-year-old girls aren't... It's not pedophilia to have sex with 14-year-old girls, amongst other things. He said something in the past about how he would like to have a young girl or something. Yeah.

Speaker 12Also, there was a couple of, I think it was triplets, that Jean-Luc Brunel flew from France, that they were 12-year-olds. I don't know why everybody's memory holding this. No, I think he, again, another suicide, quote-unquote, Jean-Luc Brunel. Like all of these, again, part of this Jewish-Israeli network, current models. I think Ryan Dawson's done a lot of great work on this. As much as Ryan Dawson's a bit...

Speaker 12Sometimes I'm not 100% sure of him, but he definitely has done a lot of great work, especially on the Epstein case and on 9-11. And some parts of 9-11 I'm not so sure about. Again, that's just my personal opinion. Obviously, he's done much more than me. And obviously, the Scumac documentary is fantastic and it's a great part. It contributes to all of our knowledge about these people.

Speaker 12But I just wanted to say that what really threw me, and this is particularly pertains to Keith Woods or Keith O'Brien, his real name, but he's not the fucking guy that, yeah, Keith Woods has obviously got a history in philosophy and he's very intellectually based and he's a very, you know, In many ways, he's one of our guys. However, he is, in some ways, and he's got a lot of connections, especially with Jared Taylor. And Jared Taylor, again, you know...

Speaker 12talking about all of the same things that we talk about, however, never wants to dip his toe into Jewish power. That's literally controlled opposition. Never, never, never wants to talk about Jewish power, even though it's staring in the face. He always just sort of said, oh, I don't know what this, or this is not something I've ever looked into. It's like, fuck me, man, come on.

Speaker 12You know, it's staring in the face and you're not speaking about it. You know, who are you and what are you talking about? So that makes me question him as a person and, you know, our renaissance and everything he goes by. But what is important, I suppose, recently, which was primarily the reason I put the hand up, is that Keith Woods and Nick Fuentes,

Speaker 12what they're not talking about, which I think is the most important thing in the moment now, especially if you consider white safety and white security and white, you know, just white people in general, which, you know, I am and I presume most of us are, is what's going on in Australia and what's happened to Joe Davis and what Thomas Thiel is talking about. And I would say that Thomas Thiel is arguably one of the most important

Speaker 12figures in white nationalism in the world today. And Nick Fuentes does what he talked about. Keith Woods does what he talked about. And for me, that is a big red flag that none of these people want to actually address something which is seriously wrong in the white hemisphere, i.e. what's taking place in Australia. So I think unless people are starting to

Speaker 12acknowledge this. Now, I see today that they've raised over 100,000 Australian dollars in the last two days, which is fantastic to see because they're going to have to go through legal battles and different things. It's obviously not enough, but it's great to see that a lot of people are chipping in. But it's the fact that these quote unquote influencers are not speaking about this

Speaker 12raises for me a lot of red flags so uh yeah that's uh that's primarily what i want to say australia is the uh australia right now is the tip of the spear this is what's taking place and follow that closely because what is taking place there will obviously be translated across the western hemisphere and uh i think they are uh i think tom stool is one of the most uh

Speaker 12forward thinking and uh and and hard-hitting uh people in our our our our uh i suppose our people that is doing the best work but anyway listen i'll leave it there and uh if there's something comes up later i might chip in but that's really what i say so yeah don't trust nick pointers obviously i think we all agree with that but they uh they he's definitely influential

Speaker 12And he is essentially a gateway because for many people in their 30s and 40s, Alex Jones was a gateway. And he brought people from there to here. So just let him do his own thing. And he will eventually, if he says the wrong thing...

Speaker 1or it goes the wrong direction. The same way Alex Jones did. Eventually that he has said so many wrong things. And that's why we're like pointing it out. That's what control of position does. But thank you so much, Richie. And yeah, I mean, Australia is like the Petri dish of the West. And they always do those things, right? They did it with COVID, also with the fires, and now with the free speech. They always do experiments over there. And thank you so much, Richie. All right, Tom.

Speaker 8Go for it. Tom? Yeah, sorry about the delay. A little bit preoccupied over here. So, you know, about something that was said earlier, I think it was Truth that said it. And, you know, I know it looks like this ICE Gestapo knocking on door scenario is inevitable. But much like the push to chill and censor speech during the COVID years fell apart, if enough people were listening to these spaces, I'm 100% certain that the door-knocking phase of this IDF-trained oppression force normalizing treating U.S. citizens like Palestinians would end before they even get any traction with it at all. And to be honest with you,

Speaker 8think they're nervous about doing something like this because they know this could backfire on them like a gen z protest in nepal i mean this is not a smart idea they're talking about they're calling for censoring people in a country where everyone's taught from a very early age that the greatness of the country lies in the fact that certain freedoms are afforded to their citizens

Speaker 8So this is a very poorly thought out situation, and I don't think it's going to work. I think they're going to fail. I think that the insistence on behalf of the more radical voices among the organized Jewish community are going to be met with opposition from more pragmatic thinkers. I hope I'm right. I could be wrong. But either way, it's really important to get as many people in these spaces as possible.

Speaker 8I'd really love to try to devise a strategy that would make it feasible for these spaces to be assisted by more people that are kind of adjacent to the subject matter that we oftentimes talk about, helping out and getting the situation to the point where we can have a larger audience. And I think it's very important because waking up the public to these things with a very broad understanding of what's going on is the only way, because most people see one aspect of what's going on or another aspect of what's going on, but if they understood it from a holistic perspective,

Speaker 8with everything we understand is taking place and that they're trying to force on us, it would be rejected en masse in a way that would make it impossible for them to enact any of these ridiculous changes that they want to force on society. And so, you know, I've been hearing things. I don't know if you guys follow. There's a great, great YouTube program. It's called the Judge Napolitano Program or Show. And he has a regular guest that I've been extremely impressed by.

Speaker 8since she's been speaking on a show. She's called Karen Kwiatkowski with a K, obviously. And, you know, the things she says are very interesting. Yesterday I heard her... Sometimes he cuts off and comes back. No, and today is extra glitchy. I don't know what happened today. My shit got rugged. I think the whole, like, all of the...

Speaker 8Twitter got rugged. Oh, you're back. I was about to drop you. Tom, are you back? Yeah, it looks like it. At what point did it cut out? A few seconds ago or a long time ago? A few seconds ago. Karen, what else? Yeah, I was listening to her talk and I was really impressed with her take. She said, and it's interesting, the Judge Napolitano show sounds way more radical than any of our spaces tend to. These guys are talking about the government being illegitimate.

Speaker 8that she now sees this administration as an enemy of the people and was saying things that i wouldn't even feel comfortable saying in the next space because i've been advised not to by someone that knows a lot but anyway i don't know it's it's a weird environment i don't personally know what the best way to navigate this is but getting as many people into these spaces is critical because even though she's more daring in many ways she won't touch on the sub she won't

Speaker 8say the word Jewish power structure. She dances, but I think it's probably just not to get Judge Napolitano's show nuked. He probably has a conversation with her. Please, don't get into it. You know what I mean, Keith? I just don't see any other way. But yeah, a couple of other things to contribute with, but I forgot what the heck they were, so we'll let this keep continuing. We've got a bunch of hands up here. Thanks, guys. I'll play Eskimer's role for a second, because I do slightly disagree, because I think whatever this PSYOP is, I think it's

Speaker 9Whatever we want to define the goal is for them, I think they're going to achieve it with, like Godfrey said, as the National Guard's rolling out soon to all 50 states, as Hexeth has said, and just the fact that they need it. They need the order out of chaos. They need people consenting to the system, and they need... It's just, again, it's the problem, reaction, solution. Open up the border. Like, what are we supposed to do? We want the legals out. But I threw in the nest, and I want to get definitely Ian and Eskimo and everybody's thoughts on this, because it's fucking terrifying. This is why Fuentes endorsing shit like this gets overlooked and is very important to call out. And I 100% agree, Tom. That's why I hope...

Speaker 2AG has a space every week because he's such a badass and he does such good research. That space last night was fantastic. That was an awesome space, brother. It was unique. Wasn't that uniquely educational and entertaining? I loved it. I thought it was awesome. I hope he does do it weekly or monthly. I'm already begging him to have a weekly show scheduled. We're definitely working on that.

Speaker 9So yeah, it would be amazing at one point. And it's literally the most pressing issue. Like it's, it's, they are about to, they are actively taking away our freedoms. And again, in the nest, I definitely want to hear Ian and this one or thoughts on this. Like peso Palantir is working on a tool for immigration customs ice that populates a map with potential deportation targets, brings up a dossier on each person and provides a quote confidence score on the person's current address.

Speaker 9So do we think that that quote-unquote confidence score sounds like a social credit score? It'll eventually be turned into an anti-Semitism score, just like with the Palestinians, where they have a fucking kill score, basically, of 0 to 100? Like, that is the shit right there, that when Fuentes endorses all this stuff, and millions of people that listen to him now endorse it, that they completely overlook. I mean, that is the beginning of...

Speaker 9That's the beginning of whatever you want to call it, the Chinese Agenda 2030 social credit score system, where it's obviously never going to start out. Like I always say, the boot is never going to come right down your neck. It's going to start in the back and slowly slide up once people manufacture consent. When it comes from the right, that's when you have a problem. I don't want to even call Fuentes right, whatever, but technically I guess he is. When it comes from the right, you have a problem. You have so many people, the usual suspects I always name, Nick Sorter, Benny Johnson, all these people pushing this.

Speaker 9that were quote unquote against this, like that right there scares the fuck out of me because soon enough, it'll be an anti-Semitism score as we see these Jews calling for censorship all over the place and stuff. And then it will be, you're thrown in a camp. I don't know what it'll be, but it's not going to end well. They're using immigrants or like these, you know, these illegal bad motherfuckers in the same sense that they were using the transgender to take your guns away. You know, these...

Speaker 4transgender lunatics, you know, Robinson, all of these fly-offs are there to make you give your guns away. They're using, like, you know, as a conservative right wing, I guess, you're like, oh, but I don't want that fucking transgender faggot to have on and shoot up a school. So you're willing to, you know, you're willing to make ways with that. So they're chipping away, guys, on both sides. They're giving you the perfect victim. Dude, lesbian Trudeau, I shoot certain

Speaker 4Like, you couldn't write a better fucking story, guys. Like, it's lesbian Justin Trudeau. Lesbian Trudeau. You know, she got shot on 333 Portland Avenue, corner 33rd. She got shot three times in the face. Lesbian Trudeau. It's a lot of psyop, guys. Minnesota's the 33rd state. It's a lot of psyop. This is all organic. Don't worry about it. Just something I want to bring up before I forget. We have hands. We have hands. I'm so sorry.

Speaker 13All right. Page 57. I'm sorry. Go ahead, sir. Good morning, folks. Or good afternoon or whatever. So I have no idea how I requested, but I did. So I've been sitting here thinking about it. And I follow all you folks, and I agree probably 99% with everything that's being said, as most people do that are sitting in this space right now.

Speaker 13But like Keith said, problem, action, solution. That is what's taking place. Everything that we see and we hear, it's, oh, I don't know how to put it. But for me, trying to get my head around what's going on in this country is just unbelievable. I'm just an old school country guy. Grew up early in life. And I've watched a lot of things go through, you know, with Vietnam and everything else within our country. But what's happening now and with this Palantir thing and the data collection and the location and all these things that's going on, the digital currency, Bitcoin, everything is leading to one direction. And that is to, you know, you control the finance. You control the food. You control movement.

Speaker 13You have control of the people. And that, to me, that's what's going on, is they want to control every aspect of our lives. Hopefully, we can fight it. Having these conversations, like I've said to Keith in the past, we have to keep continuing having these conversations. And whether you listen to Stealth or anybody else, right, you listen to them.

Speaker 13You take that information and you use, hopefully, correct discernment in trying to put it all together. But trying to get your head around this is fucking unbelievable. And Sir Escobar and Ian and everybody else, I listen to the spaces that contradict everything that we talk about, basically, right here in this space. And then I come into you guys' space and I'm going, yeah, OK. So I have to agree more on this side of it because I see

Speaker 13The Greater Israel Project, everything else that's being put together on the planet today, basically, right? How all this is working, the Saudis, the Israelis, the Qataris. Something's going on, and it's going to be interesting now with this Iran thing. And, oh, well, they didn't hang the people, so we're not going to go in. I mean, what the fuck? Hey, Patriot, I'm kind of curious. What's going on?

Ian MalcolmI couldn't stand to bear being in one of those spaces for even a couple of moments. I'm sure my digital head would explode. And so I say that because I'm kind of curious, you know, one of the best ways to understand your arguments is to understand the opposition's. And I don't really understand how they would look at the world and not say that we're on to something with the way that we see it. So I'm kind of curious what their what their takes are. Are they still claiming Trump is not owned by

Speaker 13israeli or jewish interests and if so how do they explain or justify any of the things that we see going on around us so i was just as you said that it's crazy i was just thinking right i have this meme and we've all seen it right where we're out in a big pasture and there's a hole and everybody keeps jumping into it right i mean one right after it's like the lemurs you know piling off the cliff at the edge you know

Speaker 13of the sea it's the lemons yeah it's like because they believe yeah they believe right i mean they for some reason they believe that their government is here to benefit them they you know i go back to reagan's old speech right is you know if the government knocks at your front door what do you do you turn and run out the freaking back as fast as you can i mean

Speaker 13that's where i see it that's how i see how i see life and that's you know i only have one other person in my life that actually believes that that's my brother but uh yeah no i i i find it interesting how they justify uh everything that that's being done right whether it's the genocide if that's terminology you wish to use i don't

Speaker 13argue or agree one way or the other i'm just gonna see it for what it is uh they actually just believe that all these government officials all these people are here to benefit them and they're gonna make life better but they're only here to benefit themselves this is you know it's follow the money right and that's what it is it's

Speaker 13It's conquer and control, basically. And that's the only way I can see it. That's what it is. They'll take your money. They'll take everything. Look at the taxes now. Look what they want to do. But I don't know if that answers your question or not. But I just sit and I listen to it and I look at it and I see it and I follow their news feeds or whatever and see what they're talking about and see how that's going on. And then I listen to other people like Goldie and I see, you know, as far as the Iran thing and see that side.

Speaker 13I just try to look at the really, really 50,000-foot picture, you know? Like, you know, we talk about Alex Jones, right? It's like, what the hell happened to Alex? You know, and I watch Harrison, and I listen to some of his stuff, and he's not bad. He's kind of got an objective viewpoint on his stuff, and he's pretty down with everything that's going on. But it's just amazing, and I hope everybody in this space realizes that.

Speaker 13The spider web is so huge of what's going on and what they're trying to do with, I'm going to say humanity in general. You know, I have a pinned post. It's like, what happened with the bioweapon? What happened with all these people? Nobody's held accountable anymore. So follow it from there. And I'm going to step down. I'm going to go back to work and continue listening. And thank you so much for the mic. I appreciate it.

Ian MalcolmYeah, of course. And, and, uh, appreciate if anybody ever has Intel, they want to come in and, uh, share the opposing argument. I'm always curious, uh, for it. Cause at this point I, I, I don't really, it's so funny because even, even the largest of handles that I've been in spaces with in the past that two years ago, I was the crazy guy for suggesting even they're now saying, yeah, the Zios is the term that they would use. Uh, and so I just say it because

Ian MalcolmYou know, obviously, the arguments that we've been making have continuously stuck and kind of proven out. And so at some point, you know, when you've got two neighbors and one of them keeps telling you, hey, it's going to rain today. And the other says, hey, it's going to be sunny. And every day you walk outside listening to the sunny guy and you keep getting soaked. You're like, well, now my shirts are all ruined. My car is wet. My day is in the dumps. Eventually, you're probably going to stop listening to that person, or at least I hope people would.

Ian MalcolmAnd unfortunately, the reality is we've just got an endless slew. We've got a trillion dollar propaganda machine saying that it's sunny while everybody's lives are getting worse and worse and worse. And they just unfortunately can't hear the things that we're saying because we're so suppressed and censored and all that other stuff. But it's because of people like Patriot and kudos to him. You know, I don't want an echo chamber. I don't want people like we were just talking about Fuentes and the cult of personality. I don't want people ever to say.

Ian MalcolmWell, Ian Malcolm said this, so therefore it's got to be true. I want to be in rooms with people that if I say something, just like when Machiavelli stated that Nick Fuentes was a test tube baby, I was like, wait a second, bro. I have the proof now of that. I have the proof. He's an IVF baby made in a lab. You look at his sister, it's the male side.

Speaker 3Nick Fuentes, when he started his political type of work, he got summoned by a Frenchman to go to France to get a lot of money. Eton Ralph got a lot of money. Ask him that. He changes the story 20 times. These people, Erica Kirk, they are created. She just got caught even worse, like she was making a movie about what happened.

Speaker 3before so what the hell to a certain extent these people are when they made the movie the matrix it was really to mock us because when you follow all the little clues in it it explains that you are caught in a web of lies and there's so many levels to it that we can't fathom the reality of it but it it's really when you

Speaker 3become aware you can't turn away from that and the difference between like explaining that to someone and trying to convey all these opinions and not having them look at you when you say stuff in machiavelli when you say stuff like he was made in a lab i know the term ivf that's what it means but the shock of it

Speaker 10it discredits what you're about to say. We can understand what you're saying, but the terminology that we use may, if someone is radicalized and they're super with Nick Fuentes, these points that Nick told you about using this terminology would repulse these cultish personalities. So you have to keep this in mind. That was my whole argument. Oh, yeah. I agree. After dealing with, like, because when Gamergate happened, I knew that our freedom of speech was fucked.

Speaker 3I knew that they were starting, and not only me, a lot of people started to talk about free speech was going to go. And it was all based on an emotional reaction from the portway feminism. Oh, well, we want to be revandicated. We want female characters when they already had female characters. It was nonsense. And they started to attack us. And Nick Fuentes was created just after that.

Speaker 14That's just funny. It sounds like they spawned him. I agree with this.

Speaker 9I don't use buzzwords a lot. I've never fed jacket or drew jacket people because I think it brings people's credibility down when they do it all the time and stuff. There's no way to prove he was made. I would just say, like you said, Erica and stuff, all these people, in my opinion, are sick. Wait, everyone, hold on. Hold on. I looked it up. He is. He admitted it. Here, I'll play the clip right now, okay? This is Nick Fuentes. I like this. I'm talking about pressure testing our ideas. Thank you, Megan. Yeah.

Speaker 15Yeah, here. Like I said, I'm full disclosure. I am an IVF baby. Everybody makes fun of me for that and says I'm a hypocrite for that. But this is just the Catholic position. I'm against IVF as a test tube baby. That's why I'm so fucked up. You want a case against IVF? You're looking at it. All right. Could you guys hear that? Amen. Amen. I can't tell if he's trolling or not.

Ian MalcolmNo, he's not. Well, and Keith, that's actually one of the big challenges and one of the things I find frustrating, at least in the superficial experiences that I have with the Gropers, which is just that anything that becomes awkward and unpopular is often turned into, oh, it's just a joke, bro. And then there's jokes that are made that if they end up maybe having validity are then used as predictions of future political events. It kind of reminds me and

Ian MalcolmUm, what's his name used to do this, uh, a ton man. Cause you, you probably know, uh, John Stewart, right. And Tucker Carlson even critiqued him for it and basically said, well, you said all these, these radical things. And John Stewart's retort when they were on a show called crossfire where Tucker Carlson was trying to grill him. John Stewart joked. It was pretty funny, but he said, my show literally follows puppets making prank phone calls, which is a funny comment, but it's also, it's a.

Ian MalcolmIt's an unreasonable deflection because what they do is they used Jon Stewart's programming to push a lot of liberal agendas, a lot of ideology, a lot of propaganda. And then when they would get pushback on it, oh, it's just a joke. Oh, this is just for entertainment. It's like, no, it's not. You're clearly propagandizing the, it's probably like an 18 to 30 year old audience that primarily watched his show. And that was just another avenue. Yeah, there's a name for it. It's called clown nose on, clown nose off.

Speaker 16John Stewart's show, The Daily Show, 100% liberal propaganda that was specifically meant to not look like that so that it would fool people and reach a wider audience and do as much damage as possible. And when you actually look at the content of the show, they would say, oh, we attack Democrats and we attack Republicans. Sure, they attack Democrats, but every time they attack Democrats, they're attacking them from the left.

Speaker 16Every time they attack Republicans, they're cherry picking the biggest retards they can find in order to make everyone on the right look like an idiot. So it was very carefully managed propaganda with a little bit of like funny lines thrown in. John Oliver, who worked on The Daily Show for a long time, left and he has his own show now. John Oliver is incredibly unfunny. He's just funny looking. Yeah, he's not funny at all.

Speaker 16So when you watch John Oliver's show, which I have because I kind of keep up to date on what the liberal like sort of propaganda and talking points are, it is 100 percent with a very thin veneer of like bad jokes. It is 100 percent just like act blue talking points. So that's basically what The Daily Show was. But The Daily Show did it in a much more effective, which made it a much more dangerous way. But it's a joke.

Speaker 16I was going to say, I agree with Ian. And it seems like it's like Ian was saying, it's a win. No matter what, the Gripers win. If he's right, they win. If he's wrong, then it's just a joke. And that's how it works. I mean, I don't think Nick Fuentes, and I don't think anyone really thinks that he is like a serious political policy guy. He's just, he's basically a comedian who's good at making fun of people. And his political positions are not very consistent.

@based__francisHe just is kind of like a vibes guy. Yeah, but... Real quick, real quick. On that Nick Fuentes topic, right? Like, hang on, man. I've been waiting here. You now getting into... I want to just say, real quick sub, and I got to get back to work. And hi, Ian. How you doing, brother? It's good to see you. And Joanne, and sir asking what's going on. Keith, how you doing, brother? Manco, Scott, Freud, Tom. My Cavalian, all my brothers and sisters up here. Good to see you. So, dude, like, fucking Nick, right?

@based__francisI've been dealing with the Kroipas now for a minute. I lost, and doctor, yeah, doctor, I see you. Good to see you as well. Yeah, well, I was going to say, if anybody got to heat and flack, it was you. Did Fuentes even retweet you, or am I misremembering? No, I mean, listen, he talked about Stu on the show, and then he talked about exactly what happened when he plucked me on his show the other night, because he said...

@based__franciswent into so this is what they do so this is what they do and i and i've been really watching them because you know i have a good friends they're young guys they're young boys and and i want to save them because this reminds me of the 2016 megatards that are still in 2025 uh 2026 jesus we in 2026. are completely bullish on Trump. And there's this distinction between these guys now, where we have the Q-tards that are now kind of being brushed under the table and we're making fun of them, where we had the mega-tards and now we have the Kruipers, right? That literally Nick Fuentes can go and talk about Epstein and talk about pedophilia and talk about, is it really pedophilia? And the way he said it with that tone, right? That, that, that.

@based__francisThat joking behavior. And then, not just that. So this is what they do. And I'm going to explain it real quick from a psychological point of view, right? Is he will say something like that. Let's go track back on that day. When he speaks about Epstein. When he speaks about pedophilia. When he speaks about these kids. And, oh, are they really underage? And is 12 or 14 really? And the way he says it.

@based__francisBut why did she even bring it up? Why do you now go there? Right now, why are you going there? Why are we even at that topic? Why are you even talking about that? You could have simply not done that. So nobody would have even, you know, acted the way we be acting now. It's like he did the Stalin remark, right? Oh, I'm with winners. I like winners. So he, you know, he was talking about the commies. He was standing behind Stalin.

@based__francisinstead of Uncle H. Then he makes fun of the people who did do Hitler speeches and said, well, now you're with Venezuela, now you're against ICE. He uses everything the way he wants to, and he makes the Kruipers go flip-flop constantly, because anything that he says, the next day when he gets flagged for it, he says, well, I say dumb shit, I say bullshit all the time. I've been doing this for 10 years, et cetera, et cetera, and he backtracks, and then the Kruipers go...

@based__francisOh, you don't get it. That's why we're getting rid of low IQ people like you. That's why we get rid of low. That's why we're seeding out the retards. That's what they use them when they backtrack their talking points. When they're fucked up one day, that's how they're backtracked and make people look like they're idiots. And they claim they're seeding out people and they claim there is a strategy behind it. To add to that, and I want your thoughts on this, because the...

Ian MalcolmSo I shared his talk with Alex Jones yesterday, and I said, anybody cheering on the Insurrection Act might as well put on handcuffs and just walk into the ADL lobby and be like, here I am, because that's where I see it going. And the wild part is the response from the Groypers has largely been that you're weak, that the weak men make hard times, that you're not on board with our strongman approach. And

Ian MalcolmI mean, it just seems like such a ruse that anybody with an ounce of intellect would see through and that they're just using that as a tactic, perhaps, to get anybody that's starting to critique that perspective. And look, this isn't a Nick Fuentes bashing thing, but rather I'm attacking the ideology. But I'm curious for your thoughts on that. But Ian, Ian, real quick, real quick, Ian, and that point is exactly where I wanted to get to. Let's now look at what era we're in. What did just happen? Wait, what week is it now? I think it was last week, right?

@based__francisI see news that Israel is now pushing more money into social media to push for Trump's propaganda, Trump, specifically Trump, that they're trying to talk more good things about Trump. Well, how does this comment? So let's go to Epstein and the comment of Nick Fuentes. How does this comment benefit Trump? How has he actually been talking about Trump lately?

@based__francisHe's making him his president. He's talking, I'm standing 100% behind Trump. Just a couple weeks ago, he was just shitting for months on Trump, right? You guys, I mean, that's the thing with him. I don't know if he's following it himself, if he's even understanding what he's doing for months at a time. But it's interesting that when I saw the news that they're actually now pushing more money into social media to promote Trump himself with the Israeli lobby. The Israeli lobby is actually helping Trump

@based__francisto get more promotion on social media, and getting more social media influencers to speak good about him. Right then and then, the next week, Nick Fuentes comes out and says, is it really Patafia? No, it's a... And then what got me, too, is like, he talked about Epstein the entire time, and he always said he's a Jewish spy, he's a Jewish spy. He talked shit about Epstein the entire time. He's always been talking about him. But yes, but on Tuesday, he said, he is, and that's the word,

@based__francisProbably. He used the word very carefully. Probably a Jewish spy. You see what I'm saying? And then he promoted Trump. And then he's been talking good about Trump. And then what is going on with Trump in the country? Epstein. The Epstein Files. Everybody's looking at Trump now as a pedo. And then you have the Kruipers now like, it's okay. You're just low IQ. You're just weak, like Ian just mentioned. You're just this and this and this. It's literally Q-tarts, mega-tarts. Now it's Kruiper-tarts.

@based__francisAnd it's a psyop. And these boys are getting misguided. They're getting misled by a man who's literally not understanding who he is himself yet. Because all of a sudden, he's going into like, now you're finally waking up to be an alpha. Now you want to be doing the gym. Now you're promoting for marriage. Now you're promoting for getting fit, getting active. While you were laughing at it, while you said on your stream, and anyone that's listening, you said it many times, you're gay if you go to the gym. Yep.

Speaker 3So anyways, I'm going to leave it at that. I don't buy this shit anymore, bro. Go ahead. I'm done. Go ahead. Look at the picture. It's a picture of Nick Fuentes. I put it in the bubble. It's a picture of Nick Fuentes when he was 16 years old. But look at the context of what he's in the picture. And he was starting then to advocate as a white male. That's like more than 10 years ago.

@based__francisI just make my own conclusions on this. I mean, at this point, you've got to be retarded. That's why I feel bad for my Kruipa friends. You've got to have some pattern recognition. At some point, you've got to draw a line. Like, what is this here? Like, you flip-flopping your... Your stance. What are you? Stand your ground. You're standing with this group. You're standing behind this. This is your world. That's what you're backing. But he's not. He's been flip-flopping. The Stalin comment. The gay for the gym. The anti-marriage. The anti-this. This whole constant bashing the fucking marriage and females and women and all this. It's just super Jewish. It's super gay. It's super beta. It's not alpha male.

@based__francisAnd here we are now talking about pedophilia. And here we are now talking about Trump being this fucking great president all of a sudden, dude. While you were shitting on him, shitting on Epstein, shitting on... Unbelievable. And then you have Candid Zones talking about time traveling. I just think it's a humiliation ritual, dude, at this point. It's like, are they humiliating themselves on purpose? Or what's going on here, you know? So, anyways. Well, if you call them, too, they say, vote for Newsom. Vote for Newsom, guys. That's the new thing. Oh, bro, that's what I forgot. What about the Newsom...

@based__francisKeith, thank you. What about... Don't get me started. The Chad. He is a Chad. He has a wide family. He's a Chad. He's a pro-America. Look at his family. Bro, that guy. And I live in California. Are you kidding me? Oh, my God. Jake, what's his name? That guy we had. Ian, remember that kid that was running for governor in California? You were in the space with me. We were hosting him on JQR. Jake something.

@based__francisI forgot his name. He was running for governor of California. He was a kind of dorky kid. Yeah. Kind of dorky kid. Ian was there. And we kind of pushed him into a corner. He now is running as a Democrat. And he is still promoting Gavin Newsom. Ian was there. Colin was there. And I was there. And we pushed him hard. We pushed him to the point where he didn't know what to say anymore. And this is a sigh up, my friends. I don't trust any of these guys.

@based__francisLike, we need to be always on our toes and never just fucking follow blindly a cold just because everyone loves this fucking guy. No, you're a fucking retard for falling for it. But it was a joke. Yeah, and we low IQ, right? Very. Did you cut off, Wolf? No, I'm done. I'm done. That's all I wanted to say, Joanne. I'm really happy you came up to talk to us. I really wanted to hear what Ian had to say to this kid that we interviewed from California. But whenever he gets back, God bless you, Joanne. I know. God bless you too, Wolf. And I'm really happy you finally came up to talk to us. And yeah, I'm pretty sure Ian is away from his phone for a few minutes, but he'll be back in a second.

Speaker 11All right. Glitching. Go for it. Thank you. Sorry, I'm by a busy road. I'm stepping off the street here. Give me one second. I wanted to say something that's a white pill, and it's really important. They tried several times to get past Epstein, didn't they? They thought they could ride it out with the mega cult and the Q cult. They thought people would just move on.

Speaker 11They had Mark Levin saying you were an Epsteinian kook if you believed that Epstein was involved in sex trafficking. You had Dinesh D'Souza making one of the sickest, impassioned pleas I've ever seen to move on from Epstein. And the whole time, it didn't work. And then you even had people like Michael Tracy sickeningly attacking Epstein victims.

Speaker 11So they tried everything to get past this. Nothing was working. They tried to shut down Thomas Massey. They tried to smear him. I know some people in here think he's a not, but I will disagree with you till the day I die, until I find out otherwise. And what they're trying now is their last resolve. This is their last safety valve. They're pulling out their asset, Nick Fuentes, who is supposed to be, quote, deep cover.

Speaker 11End quote. And he wasn't supposed to reveal himself like this. But they're trotting him out to defend Epstein because that's how desperate they are. This is their absolute last play to get past this. And everybody should look at this as a white pill. What did he say? I'm being forced to say this. Remember? Oh, he said that. I didn't even know that. Oh, shit. And now he's defending the police state. And 15 minutes ago, I just tossed him in the nest, and the comments scared the fuck out of me.

Speaker 9Christine Ohm has said, U.S. citizens should be prepared to show proof of citizenship. U.S. citizens show proof of citizenship. And people in the fucking comments, good. If you're not illegally, you have nothing to worry about. I want checkpoints with military personnel everywhere. All these people literally celebrating that Americans might have to show citizenship. Yeah, count me as one of them. Yeah.

Speaker 11If they're calling out Nick Fuentes to also defend the police state, that's how desperate they are. Everybody should think about that. Mancos, do you agree with that? You think Americans should have to show citizenship? 110%. Do you want the illegals out or not? Which team are you guys on? They're not going to be deported, brother. Who brought all the illegals in?

Speaker 9Who brought all the illegals in? Was it the Jews? So you guys are on the side of Jewish power now then, right? Not at all. That's a straw man and a half. No, it's not a straw man. It's a correct characterization of the back of the side that you're taking.

Speaker 16I'm not taking any side except I don't want to give up my rights because they brought in illegals. You don't have the right to not respond to police checking for things like ID in most states. What? Yeah, you do. That's called the Fourth Amendment. If you haven't committed a crime, you don't have to do anything. No, I guess you're not familiar with the law on this subject, but you can absolutely be stopped and asked to show ID in most states.

Speaker 16You can be asked. Yeah, you can be asked. Yes, and you can be arrested if you refuse. That's what the law means. Absolutely not. Absolutely not. Again, you just don't know what you're talking about. So you're saying a cop can just come up to you and just say, give me your ID, and if you don't, you can get arrested? Yeah, in most states, yes.

Speaker 17So can I just say that the point of all of this, show your ID, is you prove that you belong here, but plenty of people who do belong here were also being removed, arrested, etc.? Who that belongs here has been removed from the United States? People were actually showing digital ID and still were being detained for days. Yeah, that's not happening at any kind of scale.

Speaker 16a rare rare situation where it's happening on a lower scale until it's anytime you have listen anytime you have something like you have over 600 000 deportations like we've had there's going to be

Speaker 17situations where there's very rare mistakes that are made. And you just have to accept that no system, hold on, you have to accept that no system is perfect. You have to accept that you cannot demand perfection. Perfection doesn't exist anywhere in criminal law. This is not an argument about perfection. If you show a U.S. passport and they detain you anyway, is that about perfection or is that something that's intentionally done? Yeah, prove that that happened and that the person wasn't breaking any other law. But that's what it

Speaker 17digital id is for when you have a national digital identification it's the same as having a passport which many americans don't have by the way so how are they going to prove they're americans i happen to have one because i've been traveling since i was a baby but a lot of americans don't have a password how are they going to even prove they're americans and this digital id was supposed to be the proof and that didn't even work so come on

Speaker 8Yeah, I don't know what you're talking about, digital ID, because whenever I have to go to the airport, I have to actually show a real ID and it's even called real ID. Right. I'm sorry. That's what I meant. A real ID. Yes. I apologize. Yes. Go for it, Tom. Yeah, thanks. You know, I just wanted to chime in with the following thought. The main problem with these checkpoints is that they're not going to be used only to filter out illegal migrants.

Speaker 3They're going to be repurposed to normalize the harassment of U.S. citizens with IDF tactics that were perfected in Palestine. So, brother, bad idea. Look like China, like the social score system in China where you fart and you get a bad social score and then you can't even buy something. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Comparing them is where you go wrong, because at least in China.

Speaker 10It's based off like merit. It's coming to the USA via chaos. That's how they're bringing it. In China, it came about gradually in peacetime. It's coming to you in a chaos sense. So it's way more dangerous. This is where tyranny happens. This is where Keith mentioned the Fourth Amendment and everything's going to be like crushed because they're using that. You're not actually fighting the people doing the damage. You're always fighting the damage. Like Biden let in some fucking illegals.

Speaker 10Now Trump is a Republican, left wing, right wing. It's the same fucking bird. It's the same shit. You guys are arguing the points that don't matter. What Tom said is the most important point is they're using this to enforce something that is unlawful. It is. It's insane that people are normalizing this shit. PJ Foxy, go for it. Hi, guys. Thanks.

Speaker 18I always love to hear the space and everyone's different things and what's going on. It's all wacky to me. On the ID thing, let me just address that because I recall when they did the 9-11 act and I was so against it and they put in those centers and all that shit. Still against that 100% by the way. But I actually got stopped by a cop like right after that walking down the road to go to the store just walking because I felt like walking that day.

Speaker 18He claims he gets a call from an old grandma, stranger walking through the, no, it's like a white guy walking through a white neighborhood, not likely to happen, right? So he says, if I don't have my ID and I didn't bring it with me because, well, you know, that's like, I don't know if you guys understand the difference between before and after. Like you didn't have to bring your ID with you anywhere if you didn't want to, unless you were driving.

Speaker 18But now all of a sudden, he could arrest me or detain me, he said. He could detain me. I was like, what are you talking about? That was my introduction to the new 9-11 laws, guys. Now, they selectively enforced that. And pretty much in the state I was in, there's no way that they would let that stand at that point. But technically, yeah.

Speaker 18Since the 9-11 laws were passed by both Republicans and Democrats at the time, they all went with it. They can do that. They can detain you. You don't get a lawyer if they decide. All that good stuff's in that. I mean, read that. It's crazy. And they never got rid of it. They never did. Also, on the Nick Fuentes thing, yeah, man. I watched a video.

Speaker 18He did say that he was, quote, unquote, being forced to say this. And it's just something, like, I never was a fan of his. I'm not that young, and I just don't really like the way he talks. But it's kind of clear, man, he either sold out or he's a fucking informant, one of those two. So I'm just going to say what I think about it. That's my opinion. The other thing I was going to say about, I noticed that Scott Ritter,

Speaker 18had gotten debanked. And then I went ahead and watched one of the things he had done. He put a video out right before they debanked him. And literally, he's telling you what was going on in his opinion in Iran, what kind of op he thought it was, his opinion, because he doesn't really know. And then he started on Trump. So if anything...

Speaker 18If you can put two to two together, I know causation, all that crap, but come on, guys. He puts out a video talking bad about Trump, and then he gets debunked. I mean, the rest they probably wouldn't even have worried about. Just pointing that out. Just pointing it out.

Speaker 14And this is coming for everyone, though. That's the scariest thing. If you say anything that they are like, oh, no, this is anti-Semitic. Oh, no, you are not allowed to talk about the government. Oh, no, you're not allowed to tell people what's going on. Depends. That's crazy. If you don't have an ID. Were you in New York at the time, PJ, you were talking about? Or were you somewhere else? No, I was literally in Tennessee at the time. Tennessee. And it was just a cop, a young cop.

Speaker 18You know, some of these guys, they had started training. This is even weirder because at the time, it wasn't long before that, I remember an older cop, he was retiring, and he was telling me that they had started training the cops differently. They had started picking them differently too. Like they used to have a sort of quality that they would try to retain in someone that could actually kind of determine whether something was good or bad.

Speaker 18right? Or how to like determine, is this a moment where I should do anything? So in other words, the old mentality was protect and serve. It kind of used to be, I mean, minus the racism aspects, but yeah, they went from that to, no, it's about protecting yourself. So he mentioned that to me and I was like, okay, but it's real.

Speaker 18And they just started training them, picking different kinds of psychological aspects to people they would hire. Literally, they went from hiring stand-up people to thugs, is what I'm trying to say. That's what he was telling me. I mean, honestly, maybe he was right. You know, he mentioned something about it, you know. And I liked the old cop. I mean, I'd known him most of my life. He was a really good guy.

Speaker 18not a racist at all none of that and in any case he was trying to sell me his property because he was retired and he wanted to move but i was walking down the road through my neighborhood not even far like a block because it was a nice day i figured i'd walk to the little gas station instead of driving and then this was like right after the 9 11 laws got passed yeah they i noticed they started doing more of that where

Speaker 18They don't have to read your rights, all that other stuff. It's crazy to me. It's like night and day. It was from night and day on the amount of rights we lost right then. And I don't know if everyone here understands that. Yeah, and I just looked it up. You cannot be arrested in America. I mean, I already knew it. You cannot be arrested in America for not providing. And Mike's down there. They can detain you, yeah. I mean, if you were not suspected of a crime, oh, Manco's left because I wanted to ask him. No, they can't arrest you, but the way the 9-11 law was worded, they can detain you indefinitely without your rights being read to you and without providing you a lawyer if they so deem you.

Speaker 18Well, then you can sue their ass. But either way, I mean, the fact that she's saying this, and I just want to make sure that, like I said, that I'm clear. Yeah, I mean, generally speaking, like I said. They can't walk up to you and say, you have to give me your ID or you're getting arrested. No, it's not state laws. The state laws are still the way they always were. Well, that's what I'm saying. That's why I disagree with Banco's. They've started slowly changing those, too, to be more in line with doing more. But what I was trying to say is basically,

Speaker 18As far as I know, there was only one instance of them detaining an American citizen under those 9-11 laws without giving them a lawyer for years. Years, guys. They finally released them. So, that's all I know. I don't know much more about it than that, but the fact that they're saying it is because they actually can detain you.

Speaker 18They're normalizing it. If people are going to go along with it to show proof of citizenship, it's fucking insane. What was weirder about the 9-11 laws is it encompassed all police forces, not just federal, all police forces. So, yeah, they could. They could do that. Now, whether or not the local police... But again, they technically cannot. They cannot, by the Constitution, they cannot just come up to you and do that.

Speaker 18I mean, I think Mike knows about this, so should we go to him? Yeah, I'll be done in a minute. Yeah, I'll be done. I just want to say that I agree with you. By the Constitution, they can't. But they passed those laws back then, and the shadier part is because they say they're technically not going against your rights. That's how they get around that. Anyways, guys, I'm done. All right, thank you so much for coming up, BJ.

Speaker 19Mike, go for it. Good afternoon, beautiful people. Yeah, I just wanted to touch on that. I threw up in the nest. Hope you guys don't mind. It's very important, especially on this topic. It's the Supremacy Clause. Article 6, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution declares that the Constitution and the laws in the Bill of Rights are the supreme law of the land. And anything that...

Speaker 19diverts from that is unconstitutional and is null and void. Now, we have to ask ourselves, well, they made the law, they tell us. So this comes down to your individual knowledge, one, of the topic and your rights. Two, just so everyone's clear, the reason that we're here today, right now, especially if you're in America, is because some guy said,

Speaker 19fuck you harder. And they said, no, you don't get to do this. And then shot them in the face, literally. So we are approaching times that are eerily similar to the founding of our country. This is our 250th anniversary. But the tools that we were given in the Constitution are for us to use. OK, so if you just hand them over and you tell the feds or any person for that matter, then you just roll over on your back like a simp. Then that's it. That's just who you are and whatever. I don't know. But please adopt the spirit of our framers a little bit more. Understand your rights just because they say it's the law does not make it constitutional and does not mean that you have to comply.

Speaker 19You don't. Law enforcement is not allowed to just come up to you and ask you for your ID. It's illegal. Under Title 18, U.S. Law Code Title 18, subsection 241, conspiring to infringe on constitutional rights. OK, so just from the jump, they're a felon. Authoritative figures from the government must have reasonable, articulable suspicion.

Speaker 19They refer to this as RAS. If you're ever approached, you ask the officer, what is your reasonable, articulable suspicion of stopping me? If they stutter, then they do not have reasonable, articulable suspicion. At that point, you say, we're done here. And then it comes up to whether or not you have the balls to fucking defend yourself. That's why you have the Second Amendment. There is case law that literally, if you're in a stand-your-ground state,

Speaker 19which is anywhere in America, just because they make laws so that you can't, you get to defend yourself, okay? So now that comes to the point where you have to be able and capable to stand your ground. One is knowledge and knowing your rights and the limitations of the authority, and for you to physically be able to defend those rights and back it up. Using it...

Speaker 19Using the tools handed to us in the Constitution. So that's why I always emphasis on training a little bit. I could be doing more. We could all be doing more. But please take it seriously. Please learn your rights because this is not going away. It's only going to keep escalating from here. I mean, they sent feds. They sent the National Guard to D.C. in August. They were supposed to have 30 days before congressional.

Speaker 19Congress had to get involved, and they left them there. And then they just killed two National Guardsmen three months later. So they were two months out of the window of them legally operating on the streets. So know your rights, understand what the Constitution is there for. They're trying to strip it from us on purpose. It's our greatest tool that we could possibly use to save this country.

Speaker 3The world, I guess. Because it's made on the God-given right to own land and to be able to defend yourself. And that's really what they're attacking. The Constitution is an insult to the Jews in kind of a way. Because when our ancestors moved to America, there were... clearly running away from the usury system. And they made the Constitution in the U.S. specifically on the God-given rights to kind of, you know, make it hard for them to fuck with it. And also, everything Mike said is right, and another easy one is literally just say, am I being detained? And then there's your answer right there. But this Kristi Noem shit, again, second back of the nest, Kristi Noem says, U.S. citizens should be prepared to show proof of citizenship.

Speaker 9Literally, I mean, again, Mike laid it out. That violates the concept. The only thing I will slightly disagree with you on, Mike, and I'm joking kind of, but you said we're getting eerily similar to where the founding fathers were when they, you know, what? But those motherfuckers would have shot us in the face by now with the shit that we're letting go on. Never mind, I mean, over 2% taxes and shit. And we got people, again, I don't know Mancos that well, but...

Speaker 9I could not disagree more if he is all for people having to show their citizenship just to get rid of the illegals. Like you said last week, you nailed it in my space. Yeah, we want to get rid of them, but not at the expense of all of our rights being taken away and being handed to fucking Donald Trump and Palantir. They're definitely going to take care of it. Dr. Roshanak, go ahead. So great conversation. I'm really loving this and I love how this is why I came into your space, Ian.

Speaker 17And hi, Joanne. Hi, everybody. Thank you so much for being here. Thank you for having me here. I love the space because even though sometimes we talk a little bit over each other and I did it, I usually don't. It's a respectful space and there are opinions here as opposed to people being completely out of control. And I love that. So I appreciate you guys hosting and co-hosting this so well. So let me just say that. And I appreciate all the speakers who've come up and shared. So I don't know if you guys have noticed, and I'm sure you have.

Speaker 17There is the law and there is who is going to enforce the law. And that's, I think, a big problem that we've been facing is we have constitutional rights. We have state rights. We have all kinds of rights. And what she just said, Noam, is be prepared. So it's like testing the temperature of how are we going to react? And we just scream into the wind, which I posted somewhere in the purple pill or the nest or something. You know, it's great that we have these spaces and we get informed, but then what? Then you've really, so I'm going to talk as a neuroscientist. Then you relieve yourself of something. You feel that you've taken action, but you, I mean, there's some action. This is important, but as we say in science, it's necessary, but not sufficient. It is important for us to be able to.

Speaker 17pay attention to what's going on to, to learn things and to share that. Awesome. But then what? And this idea of individually fighting an officer of the law, I don't think that's a great idea. People were unarmed to getting shot in the face. Okay. And the law, there is a, I forget what it's called right now, but there is a, an arm of the government that is set up that is meant to investigate these sorts of things. And they literally said, we're not going to investigate it. So,

Speaker 17Legally, they're supposed to do that. And we see over and over again that there are rights that are being trampled. And if we try to fight everything individually, we lose. They're organized. We're not. We need to. And even if it's a small, we need to. Look, you want to have your voice heard. You could either decide to do it in a way that puts you absolutely at risk and takes you out of the equation, or you can all go in and wreak havoc in a way that makes sense

Speaker 17legally, politically. Do you see what I'm saying? There are so many more of us, as everybody is saying, than there are of them. But if you're not organized, it doesn't matter how many people there are. Five organized people can outdo five million disorganized people. Thank you. Amen. Amen. It's a good amount of people that have been arrested by ICE and DHS this year illegally.

Speaker 9And it might not be 10,000 plus, but it doesn't matter. That's where, again, I just couldn't disagree more. It's wild. It really is. And children getting strip searched, by the way. Yeah, exactly. And how is that protecting us? And when did we become a nation that allows children to be strip searched? Help me out here. It happened daily. Well, there was a split.

Speaker 3In the 19, like between when I was born in 82 and there was a mental switch after 9-11 because even the stuff that happened in the U.S. affected Quebec, Montreal. Like it went from a shock and awe, like I keep...

Ian Malcolmtalking about, but it affected and it's exponential. And we see it again today with all of that. Hey, Escanor, a quick question for you on the shock and awe piece. I'm kind of curious for your thoughts on, because I know you talk a lot about the psychology of this stuff at a macro level. I'm curious for your thoughts on COVID being a precursor to all the things that people are going through now, because that was used perhaps as a psychological nuclear bomb on everybody in terms of normalizing this idea that the government can tell you what you have to do.

Speaker 4Yeah, it's actually funny you say that because while Mike was talking about, look, I'm not, look, I'm going to be a contrarian, right? I'd like to be just a perspective, but the whole sovereign idea, you know, sovereign citizen, the constitution, my problem with these ideas is that the constitution is only as powerful, I guess, as the balls of those that are holding it up. That's my fucking problem at all times, that people are pussy. That's the fucking problem.

Speaker 4And COVID proved that. Because law, no law, this, no that, they complied with fucking bullshit. I don't give a fuck what the law tells me or doesn't tell me. I know that everybody complied with bullshit. And they all came. Everybody the fuck came around you. Friends you thought were tough. All these people, faggots, came. All of them. And I saw that all around me. Sickened the living fuck out of me.

Speaker 4And I'm sure it happened to all of you. That's why we're fucking here in angry, right? So I don't know how to answer your question, but yeah, dude, and it's not helping because I'm not going to, how about this, the vehicle that's going to liberate us, it better not be fucking standing on the pillars of the cowardice of our fucking fellow friends and neighbors. That's not going to work out for nobody. Unfortunately, I don't trust courage in people anymore. COVID proved all that shit.

Speaker 4And I'll say it this way, right? You know the law. In Canada, the role of a prime minister is not even written into our act, into our constitution. It's a role that's ritualized into us by the queen. And its only actual powers is to appoint other people's positions. So when Trudeau was shutting down fuck in the whole country, he was doing so on what powers that didn't exist. Nobody mentioned that.

Speaker 4Not a single fucking lawyer. Nobody fucking nothing. None of that. So it's not going to get better, guys. Not with AI. Not with them measuring, managing, monetizing the metrics of our reactions added on to all of this with more infrastructure, with 6G, with Palantir. I don't want to be like, sorry, man, but I don't see how it's going to get better in this direction. So people need to really

Speaker 4Something drastic needs to happen, and the worst part is that I know that's going to happen, and they're going to cede and control the drastic action as the vehicle to take us in the exact control that we're trying to avoid. So that's why I think the Kansas City shuffle three-card monthly psyops is happening, right? That's going to mean Project Stargate's not here to save us? Weren't you the one that has the receipt on where Trump got that money?

Speaker 4Yeah, bro, I called it, too. I called it. Yeah, you did. Motherfucker, he always does the same shit. Escanor strikes again. Every time Trump says anything, look, like right now, I'll tell you this week what he did, right, with the whole BlackRock thing. Yeah, motherfucker, he's promoting some BlackRock executive into the cabinet, as he's saying we're attacking Blackstone for their single-family home purchases, which is...

Speaker 4Beyond the fact because they've already bought everything. So it doesn't fucking matter anymore. They already own it all, okay? They're not going to own everything plus one. Thank you, bro. So with the Palantir, the Stargate, that involves all of them, right? Ellison, Altman, Musk, fucking all of them. He took that money from the Paris Agreement. He's like, yeah, we're going to save one trillion dollars from the Paris Agreement over the next five years. And with the same breath, he's like, we're injecting it into fucking Project Stargate. So on one hand, you're like, yeah.

Speaker 4You know, I guess it's better to take that money and burn it in the Paris agreement than to put it in the fucking Poggett's target, which is crazy. That's the predicament word. And it's all bullshit, as usual. He does the opposite of exactly what he's about to say he's going to do. We're going after Raytheon. Just last week, he started talking about Raytheon. First of all... This last week, he gets rid of Jerome Powell and he puts in a BlackRock guy. Raytheon is not even called Raytheon anymore, by the way. It's called RTS.

Speaker 4So the fact that he's using the terminology Raytheon, it makes me instantly know that he's using that to fucking gaslight everybody. Everybody that knows Raytheon's an enemy is going to get fucking triggered by that shit, right? So he uses Raytheon, he talks shit about them, and at the same breath, he adds $1.5 trillion into the military-industrial fucking complex. It is the opposite of what the fuck you think he's doing. As always, the grand magician.

Speaker 9It's so much sleight of hand. It's unbelievable. It really is. Oh, we need to take the Panama Canal back from China, blah, blah, blah. Oh, we gave it to BlackRock. Oh, we're going to get rid of Jerome Powell. Oh, we put a BlackRock executive in there. And it came out this week, too. Trump said they got rid of gender surgery funding shit, but they've sneakily snuck it in in the back door, and nobody knows about it. It's just, it is. It's magician sleight of hand shit. I fucking hate it, and people fall for it. I get it, but people need to stop falling for it.

Speaker 4it's because they're pussies again. I don't want to keep backtracking to the same shit, but they keep having to offer responsibility and accountability by putting it into some grand scheme to save the fucking world when you don't have the balls to save yourself and your own fucking household, right? You have to make it something, you know, you have to make it something beyond stealth to make it hypnotize you. Oh, it's a selfless act. No, you're a pussy. That's the, you're honestly, you're a pussy. That's what it boils down to. You're not some,

Speaker 4ascending 5D mahjong faggot. If you're not willing to drop the hammer, I don't want to hear about how you're going to meditate your way out of this shit. So that's where I stand. Oh, man. I sent you a beautiful picture, Escanor. You got to be tough like Dan Bongino, right, Escanor? Exactly, like his karate, like that other fucking faggot on Fox. What's his name? That fucking asshole's name.

Speaker 20The CIA asshole. Henry. Yeah. He said some weird things. All right. Let me, Frank, go for it. Hey, good morning. Good to see everyone. Yeah, I was just kind of looking up the Patriot Act, which was enacted after 9-11, which we all know. And I didn't realize it. It's actually USA PATRIOT, all caps. Acronyms, sorry. Can you hear me? I don't know if it's me. I'm glitching it. No, no, it's Frank. Oh, okay. Yeah, I was getting a phone call. So, yeah, and it stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing...

Speaker 20appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act. It was U.S. legislation passed after 9-11 significantly expanding government surveillance and investigative powers for law enforcement and intelligence agencies, allowing for easier data sharing. That's all that's playing in my mind while you read this. Problem, reaction, solution. Sneak and peek searches, whatever that is. Never heard of sneak and peek.

Speaker 20And greater scrutiny of financial transactions to combat terrorism. So it sparked major privacy debates, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And yes, the Constitution is supposed to supersede all of the other laws. However, they constantly do unconstitutional stuff all the time. That Trevor case versus Montana. was overruled or Supreme Court, they voted nine to zero on it. So, and that is the, I guess, I don't know if you guys heard about that, but that just happened. That addressed warrantless home entries under the fourth amendment ruling that police can enter a home without a warrant if they have an objectively reasonable basis, quote unquote.

Speaker 20to believe someone inside needs emergency assistance even without probable cause, affirming the conviction of William Trevor Case for assaulting an officer who entered his home during a welfare check. Court found officers believe Case needed help due to threats of suicide and observations like a handgun holster and potential suicide note, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So yeah, and even if that situation actually did happen,

Speaker 20where he actually did have threats of suicide or whatnot. They can always fabricate that crap. I was actually stopped. I was stopped by border patrol when I was driving. I was in Mexico, Tijuana, bought some stuff. And I was driving from California. I went back into California and I was driving to Arizona. And, you know, I, yeah, I guess I had a cell phone, but I think, when was this? I doubt they were like, you know, surveilling people that heavily then.

Speaker 20but I got stopped at a border patrol checkpoint at the state line, or maybe just before it, into Arizona. And, you know, I've got some tattoos on my arms and stuff, so obviously I was profiled. And they sent me into secondary to pull over, and, you know, all bets are off at that point. And a guy comes out with a dog, and I worked in law enforcement in the military, but I did...

Speaker 20Maritime law enforcement, so I didn't I didn't know I was trained differently on there's a lot of stuff I didn't have to know but um, but I knew I knew enough and the guy walked around with the dog and then he goes Sir, you gotta exit the vehicle. I said why he goes. Oh our dog made a hit No, he didn't I said I said your dog your dogs are trained to sit when they make a hit And so obviously that pissed him off because I called him on his shit and

Speaker 20So I pulled out my phone because I knew that would make him more angry. And he goes, what are you doing? And I said, I'm calling my wife. I'm, you know, my ex-wife. I'm, you know, 500 miles away. She's expecting me at a certain time. I'm out in the middle of nowhere. I don't want her worried. You know, I'm going to see my daughter. And he's like, you know, if you make that phone call, I'm going to pull you out and arrest you. And by this time, three other agents are walking over to my car. So I'm like, okay, whatever. All right. So I get out of the car. It's a rental.

Speaker 20too. And I told him, I said, hey, it's a rental. So, you know, if you find, I said, what happens if you find a roach in the ashtray? Is that, you know, like, what, am I going to be arrested? He goes, well, we'll see, you know. And of course, they didn't find anything. And they're like, okay. I said, am I free to go? They said, yeah, have a nice day. And I said, yeah, I'm not the guy you're looking for, you know. So they, when you're around people, you know, with a badge and a gun, you see that it gets their head. The morals of

Speaker 20policing aren't the same it's not that it's not the guy walking down the street with just a billy club anymore you know we're in a very different world so um so yeah this whole thing um with the basically uh searching and and seizing without any uh probable cause is getting weirder and weirder but it's it's to be expected i guess so i'll land it there though thanks

Speaker 9The case law you brought up is important because people need to make sure if they go to the doctors and stuff, don't tell the doctor that you're depressed or highly depressed or anything amongst those means because then they can do what the case law Frank just brought up and say, oh, somebody said that this doctor said or somebody said this person's depressed. So we got to go in and check on them or whatever. And then if you're a quote unquote anti-Semite, they accidentally murder you. And here in California, when you go to the doctor, a lot of times they'll ask if you're a gun owner.

Speaker 9Yes, it was that damn fishing boat action. Lost him. Sorry, Newsome. Who's that? Oh, we got Vic there. Vic, you up there, brother man? Thank you, man. Answering about COVID, it was an exercise of power and Shinzo Abe, God bless his soul, he died because of it. We should remember that.

Speaker 20That's what happens when you want to give your people ivermectin, not vaccines. They shoot you in the back. It's just crazy. Real quick, COVID was, I like to say it was one big Milgram experiment. And if you've never heard of the Milgram experiment, look it up. It's pretty interesting. It correlates perfectly to COVID. Is it like an exercise of power? That's what I was saying.

Speaker 9Yeah, it's people. It was like 20 people, and it's a guy in a trench coat, in a lab coat, a.k.a. Fauci. And there's a guy on the other side of the wall that they can't see. And this person in the lab coat tells everybody to keep turning the voltage up in the person, but they can hear him screaming. And I'm 99% sure 100% of them went past the point of when he...

Speaker 9I think they told him what the lethal amount was, and they went to that, and over 60% to 70% went even farther to the point when he wasn't talking anymore. And the doctor kept saying, yep, keep zapping him. And then they still kept fucking zapping him. That's people with social security numbers, like real people. He has gain-of-function research labs all over the world.

Speaker 10Let's not start with that. The lab in Wuhan is a dual citizen, American and Chinese lady who ran the lab for him. Let's not get into that. I just need to get back to this point. Did you know if you're sleeping in the car, they can legally break your window if you're not responding? They can legally break your window and just come into your car. 60 years back, this wouldn't happen. People wouldn't, the police or...

Speaker 10You wouldn't expect if you're sleeping in your car, like in the wilderness, someone's going to break your window, you know? So that's how they try to appeal to the masses. If the masses realize, oh, there's a doggy in the car, that makes sense. We should break the window, you know? So they ruined the constitution that was built to be followed in all ages.

Speaker 10by psyoping you into thinking, yeah, this makes sense. Because the masses are dumb. They're so fucking dumb. And we shouldn't outsource all the decisions to them. They are fucking dumb. Because even the loud minority is cosplaying as the masses. The loud minority say shit, outlandish shit, and the masses go like, yeah, that makes sense. Doggy is in the car. We should break the window. No, you can't do that.

Speaker 10You know, once you cross all these, like, they look like they're thin lines, but they're very important lines. You can't just cross them. And they pile up. And the more they pile up, the more you lose your rights. And you guys should be stopping at everything and going like, no, no. The totalitarian tiptoe. Exactly. It's a slow rug pull, if you think about it. It's a very slow rug pull. They're just slowly rug pulling you.

Speaker 10Until you think that you notice now. A doctor said something very important, like your dopamine and serotonin spikes when you notice. They've stopped you from noticing so long. The same platform, Instagram, in 2021 was telling you, this information is not true. Make sure why this is true. Double check information. Fact check. They were censoring you, and now Instagram is the most anti-Semitic app. That doesn't make sense. That doesn't make sense. They want it out there, yep. They want you to think...

Speaker 10Yeah, they want you to think you can't notice. No, no, it's not good. Then you notice en masse, like I'm getting into an Uber, guys. This happened more than one time. And the Uber is being anti-Semitic. Like it doesn't, this is not normal. This shouldn't be happening. I am anti-Semitic. I am Semitic. I'm anti-Jewish. So I'm not anti-Semitic. They even hijack the word. Like what I'm saying is these people, these people are slowly rug pulling us.

Speaker 10And we need a vehicle, like Escanor said, like the organized few beat the disorganized many. So we need like a vehicle, an NGO or an MPO where all this noticing is going somewhere because right now it's not going anywhere. It's going where they want, where you're pent up and then they steer you into a, like if you're a mentally deranged kid, they can use MPO. They own everything. Yeah. If you don't have a proper vehicle,

Speaker 10that is not built on reaction, then they can hijack any reaction that happens. They can use a mentally deranged kid that was in a BlackRock video to shoot at your president because MKUltra even talked about this. So I wish to hear solutions. Like, what are we going to do? Guys, if you fall, the whole world falls. I'm not being, like, I'm not fucking here. This is real shit. Yeah, the whole world falls. You guys think...

Speaker 10You actually guys think China and Russia, these are all like they were propelled by Israel. I talked about the blueprints for the YF-23 jet. They were leaked by Israel. Israel outsourced hundreds of your biggest companies to China. The board members were all Jewish. This is reality. Please, guys. China and Russia are fake threats. They've always been fake threats. Yep. Eskenor, did you want to say something? You're shown as a listener for me.

Speaker 4I want to say something about the Milgram experiment. I just wanted to squeeze a little bit of opium out of that one too. Listen to this shit. Stanley Milgram, he found that I think 80% of the population doesn't have the moral or psychological capacity to defy authority or an authoritative order, meaning that only 20% of the population have the critical thinking to go beyond

Speaker 4an order from an authority. The bad thing is that this experiment was also conducted again in Poland in 2015, and that number was cut in half. So only 10% of those subjects were able to have critical thinking. So it's gotten worse, apparently, if you want to follow the data of the Milgrim's experiment, because it was done again in 2015, and people don't know that, and it's even worse.

Speaker 3So there's lots. Look at the Ash experiment in the bubble. It's another experiment that they made. It's about conformity. So if one person is saying the right thing, but the five others are saying the contrary and it's not the right thing, it's just bullshit. Slowly the person in the, they start to say the same shit and they fall into the pattern. And if you combine that with the mouse experiment,

Speaker 3Putting us in cities. You see where they're going with this. Oh yeah bro. That mouse one is wild. I saw that recently. They literally put them in those things. And they go fucking crazy. Like we do in cities. Yeah they get homosexuals. Mouse become homosexual. And they stop having mice. Little mices. And then they all die. This is exactly what they're doing.

Speaker 9And they're fucking luring us onto this app because 20 minutes ago, breaking news from RozAlerts, X has just announced that creators on this platform will receive significantly higher payouts. I mean, Elon said that he wants to make this the everything app. So it says, here's a list of X changes. Yeah, exactly. And then you'll get the Ian special where your pinned tweet is just up for years and then all of a sudden just poof, goes away. And you're not allowed to, yeah.

Ian MalcolmAnd the other one, the wild one, yesterday or two days ago, so I did one that's the pinned tweet. I also did one that was on what I called the JP, and I referred to Jewish privilege, and I walked through how white privilege was a thing for the entirety of my life. I've been told about white privilege, and then I walked through how, what's the definition of the word? How would we define it? How would we demonstrate it? And then I...

Ian MalcolmI showcase how it is the exact inverse. It's Jewish supremacy. So that had been previously listed as hateful conduct and was also unable to be shared and all those other things that we've seen, like my pinned tweet. What was weird, that happened about a year ago. Just two or three days ago, that post was now removed from visibility in all of Europe, which I think this is the first time I've seen it. I don't even think they did it to my pinned tweet.

Ian MalcolmAnd they've removed all visibility as it's been, I guess, deemed criminal by some court or some other higher body. And as a result, X is complying with the requirements and removing it from view. And so they're taking it to the next level. They're now just not even making things that you can't engage with them. They're just hiding them all together in the name of, quote unquote, the law. And just laws they make up in the EU and just say, you've got to enforce. See, people, see where, like Vic said, I mean, where we are.

Ian Malcolmthe only country that stands a fucking chance, to be honest. All these other countries are so overrun with immigrants, and there's so much... Well, I mean, we're cucked as well, this country, but either way, at least... So, Keith, I just got it for you. So here you go. The post... Again, this is a changed thing. It was already marked as visibility limited, but this is in addition to that. In accordance with applicable law, X is now permanently withholding reported content across the EU.

Ian Malcolmspecifically for the following legal grounds, illegal and or harmful speech, and then goes on and on and on to define those things. The irony, and this is the only reason that I knew that it was the one that was previously visibility limited, is because when I clicked the appeal button, it said, you've already had your appeal, and it was denied. So basically, if you say the Mormons, you'll get censored. Obviously, kidding. And the other thing, Keith, that's curious about it, so...

Ian MalcolmI don't find it at all unusual that this comes on the heels of, I've been doing this little series of historical quotes about the Jays, and many of them, so the Tacitus ones at 162,000, this other one on Napoleon, 500,000, this other one from John Quincy Adams, 400,000, and from Thomas Jefferson, 300,000. That was all last week. I never get those kind of views on anything that I put out because I'm so suppressed.

Ian MalcolmAnd so I'm convinced that somewhere along the algorithm, maybe a label fell off or something else happened that allowed some of those to get a little bit more viral than they'd like. And as a result, they probably went through my content and just said, all right, we'll just slap a label on this one and nuke them back down to the latest one that I did on Ulysses S. Grant, a whopping 11,000. So they've nerfed 30 or 40 or 50x the visibility of my handle, it seems, based on those metrics.

Ian MalcolmThat explains why you're number one in the threat level of anti-Semitism rating. Yeah, there you go. And I do think, so when I ran the numbers, apparently 1984 is actually a 9.2. So he's got me beat. The Austrian painter, I think, was a 9.4. Jesus Christ was a 9.6. I think it was Colin or Uncensored who asked. Yeah, I think it was Uncensored who he asked for the fictitious X scores.

Ian MalcolmOn the OHI metrics of the Austrian painter and of Jesus Christ, and I think he did maybe Bobby Fischer or something like that, and they were all very, very, very high. But no, I don't doubt that the fact that those posts had gone way more viral than most of mine ever would, I think that probably played into that scoring. And speaking of experiments, I tossed them in front of the nest because I found the clip the other day. If people don't put tape over the front of your phones...

Speaker 9then you can see in the front of the nest what happens to you. You get flashed a hundred times a minute with UV blue lights that also map your face for when they need to identify you out in public, if you're at a rally, whatever, anything like that. Obviously they can identify you by how you walk through your gate, as it's called. But again, please put it, like I said, my eye strains has gone down immensely the last seven, eight months since I put it on. It's just a little piece of black tape on the front of the camera. Otherwise,

Speaker 9You can see what happens to you in the front of the nest. And they don't show you that for a reason. And that's, they do to Machiavelli, remind me to mice as well, to get them to turn off their fight or flight receptors where sometimes they'll blast them with blue light and they'll attack a cat. Sometimes they won't. And then there'll be docile just like what they did during the pandemic when all those 5g towers went up. And to be honest with, they're doing to me as I look at this blue light phone right now, but what choice do we have?

Speaker 3It's frequencies as well. They're playing on the frequencies, all those towers. They're putting a pressure on the psyche of people, if you want. That's my opinion with all the frequency jamming and things that they put up, the wave shit. Hold on, I gotta make room for this Jack Posobiec guy. I love Jack Posobiec. Mr. Stacey's here! He's still connecting.

Speaker 20Oh, and I'd like to quickly point out that there was another experiment, which they would never do again today because it was too crazy. It was called the prison experiment done at Stanford. They've also done a few films about it. I think there might be... Isn't that when they murdered each other? No, it's one day... Yeah, go for it. No, it got bad. They terminated it after six days because of the extreme psychological distress and abuse. Yeah, there was abuse, but I don't think anyone died.

Speaker 20In the movie, they may have taken the, you know, they may have taken a little Hollywood. Yeah. But yeah, it was. Yeah, it's it's it's really interesting looking. It's basically the Milgram experiment, too. So.

Speaker 9After six days, they shut it? I didn't know that. That must have been seriously fucked up, because they gave, during MKUltra, they gave black people in the South, like, acid for, like, fucking 80 days in a row at one time, and, like, other people, they gave, like, four times the legal dose of acid, or lethal, or normal dose, whatever, of acid for, like, 30 days, and put headphones on their head, like, blasting that your mother hates you, and all this shit. All these fucking insane experiments. Luckily, we know everything from MKUltra, because Congress said, during, I think, the Church Commission or whatever, that

Speaker 9You guys, CAA, you guys cannot destroy the MKUltra files. You need to hand them all over to us. So they went and they handed them over to them. Oh, no, actually, no, they went and they destroyed 80% of them and burned them and left 20% behind, what we know. God knows what they do. There was a director that did that to their actors.

Speaker 1But it was kind of different. I can't remember which movie, but I will look into it again. He gave really nice folders to the ones who were the good guys or something like that and then gave really bad ones to the other ones and kept treating them completely different so that the people... But it was like, oh no, this is for acting, right? And everyone was like, yes, we love it. But I mean, it's like literally a psychological experiment. I will look into it again because I haven't, I forgot, but it's like 15 years. But yeah, let's go with Mr. Stacy. Thank you so much for coming up. How are you? I'm good, Joanne. I think what Keith was thinking of was the Belko experiment where they basically locked workers together and

Speaker 21given them an ultimatum that they had to kill each other, otherwise they'd all be killed. So it creates, you know, a much more lethal version of what Joker in the dark night at the end with the criminals and the innocent New Yorkers or Gotham citizens on the boat. Oh, yeah, that's a great comparison. Basically killed them.

Speaker 21Yeah, and what they found in the Belko experiment is that most people would fall victim to the bystander effect. They would all expect or wait on someone else to act first. And something that we have to be cognizant of in our situation that has allowed our enemy to advance the ball so far down the field is that there's been...

Speaker 21layered underneath all of these psychological operations, you know, to run out the clock, if you will, is the contingent, I guess, reliance on the citizenry's mass bystander effect kicking in, and when it becomes apparent that all avenues of peaceful and judicial means of recourse have been exhausted that other constitutionally not only bribed but also obligated means of recourse never take place because everybody just waits on someone else to, you know, take the first step. You know, it's easy to be courageous once you're the second or you're the third or the hundredth person standing up. That's why

Speaker 21you know, in informational warfare, even using the appropriate verbiage and even being willing to stand alone on using the appropriate verbiage when everybody else is, you know, ostracizing you and trying to label you as some kind of racist or anti-Semite or bigot or whatever is so imperative because once, you know, that first person, so to speak, walks the plank and they continue to be validated and revalidated by, you know, continuously providing and having evidenced overwhelming proof of everything that they're saying is consistent with what's being realized in the real world. It's easy for another person to say, okay, well,

Speaker 21I think he's right. So I'm going to start saying, and then the next part, and then you get this cascade. And now here we are, I would say probably three and a half years later from when the first few sprinkles of people started disseminating this idea that, yeah, there is this very tribalistic ethnic element behind what seems to be the overwhelming majority of problems in America and the crimes that we keep seeing committed, especially the most heinous crimes being committed. And okay, who's behind it? What consistencies do we see? And then once you identify that, it's a matter of winning that psychological programming operation and someone or somebody's being willing to walk that plank, even if it's by themselves, even if it means everybody that they care about, you know,

Speaker 21thinks they're a lunatic or they just went crazy or they just, and all of these repressed, inherent hatreds, irrational hatreds of others just because of their skin color or their ethnic differences. And once you understand that that's what's going on and that is the duct tape that kind of holds this entire illegitimate deep state, so to speak, apparatus together, and it's eroding, it's so important that you internalize that mentally when you think about, okay, what can we do? Because everybody in this space should operate going forward with the understanding that the administration, law enforcement, intelligence, Congress,

Speaker 21you know, and our state and local supposed so-called elected leaders are not coming to save us, like operate with the we're on our own mentality and prepare and strategize with that mentality and anything positive that we get from them with regards to support of saving our country is a bonus, but we should be actively coalescing and strategizing and

Speaker 21and preparing and making preparations for how do we save ourselves if and when it becomes clear that we have zero representation from our government or our taxpayer funded agencies that are supposed to be tasked with oversight of doing all these things that would be necessary to save America. And once you operate with that mentality,

Speaker 21Baked within that, you also have to psychologically prepare yourself to be willing to be the first to step out on the, you know, walk that plank, so to speak, because it's easy, again, to be the second or third or hundredth person to take a stand, but it's really fucking hard to be courageous enough to be the first person to break that glass ceiling. And that's...

Speaker 21I'm so glad that somebody brought that analogy to the forefront because that is, like I said, the duct tape that is holding the deep states, you know, locus of control over not only the American people but really worldwide at scale. And America just happens to be the last bastion where the citizenry is armed with, you know, free speech.

Speaker 21the ability, the right to keep and bear arms, the God-given right that's constitutionally protected. And remember, the rights that we have are inherently God-given. The constitution is what protects, not allows those rights. It's a key distinction that everybody needs to make. Not everybody else in the world has, you know, documentation, you know, founding documentation that says these rights are God-given.

Speaker 21These documents restrain the government, right? Instead of these rights are given to us by our government. That's why when a slow-mo Kramer, you know, a 9-11 co-conspirator goes on Fox News and starts talking about we need to restrict the First Amendment to... in order to protect it. I, being an American with God-given rights that are protected by founding documents that were established by my ancestors who fought and died and framed those documents, can confidently look that guy in the face and say, go fuck yourself. And if you want to make something of it,

Speaker 21feel free, you will get the enemy's foreign and domestic treatment because you are an Israeli who works for Israeli special forces. You have literally nothing to do, no oversight, no jurisdiction, and no right whatsoever to dictate to the American people at all what rights they do and don't have and the scope of where those rights extend and end.

Speaker 21And that also applies to Jonathan Greenblatt and all of his B'nai Barith operatives that are trying to tell us they're surveilling us with the FBI. Any FBI operatives who are working with the B'nai Barith, everything I'm saying applies to you as well. You do not matter. And if you want to make something of it, then that will be the mistake that you make because the American people do not pay attention, do not give a fuck about what foreign interests think or say.

Speaker 21And thankfully, we fought two wars, the War of 1776 and 1812, to tell the Rothschilds to go fuck off and make sure that they understood perfectly to fuck off. That's all. Thank you. God bless, Andrew Jackson. I fully agree. People have to embrace being uncomfortable and going against the grain, especially nowadays. Everyone just...

Ian Malcolmlike backup said, just puts their head down and goes along to get along at the end of the day. And Keith, isn't it wild? So you would think after everything that has been taken by this group of people that have basically outsourced all the wealth, all the value, all the everything, all the military might, all the goodwill, you would think that they would be in a position, and Benjamin Netanyahu even said this the other day, he's...

Ian MalcolmYou know, Israel is now in a position to not need any more money from the United States. And then two things happen. Number one, Trump says, no, no, no, you must take the money, which is just the most bizarre reaction that anybody could possibly have. But it's also indicative of the fact, and I'd be curious for backup's thoughts on this, this is a machine that in spite of everything, it has had basically an unlimited credit card in military for 25 plus years.

Ian MalcolmAnd it still is essentially an existential threat if America says, we're not giving you anything else. They are literally incompetent and incapable of doing anything to fend for themselves, to work for themselves, to build something for themselves. It seems like all they can do is just leech off the American and Western economy and the rest of this global financial disease that they sit at the very top of. And I find it so unbelievable.

Ian MalcolmI mean, imagine if you had, and back up, I'll throw this one at you. Imagine if you had 25 years to build whatever you wanted with as much money as you could possibly steal on an island. At the end of the 25 years, you'd probably be kicking back and, you know, laying out in the sun with your fishing pole and you'd be watching the beach and all this stuff. This system still is in a position after two and a half decades, and that's just being generous, right? It realistically goes back to JFK, and they're still incapable of doing anything for themselves.

Speaker 21And so I'm just curious, back up, if the United States tomorrow said, you don't get another thing, what do you think would be the outcome for Israel and this set of interests? What they're trying to do right now with this move to end foreign aid and make it look like America is trying to keep it going on, they're trying to codify Israel as a long-term strategic partner with the United States to psychologically put

Speaker 21Israel on the same superpower framework as the United States and lock it in for the next 20 years. This was all very much by design. And Danny Dannen, who is the Israeli ambassador to the UN now, is the former, I say former, anytime I say former is loosely in quotes, former world chairman of Likud and the... the world head of the Batar movement, which just got shut down in New York City and is actively going after white American men in their own country to remove them from positions of influence in this country. And that will be sorted out as well. Hopefully it's peacefully, but it's going to be sorted out one way or the other because Batar shares its headquarters with Likud. It is an operation of the Kahanist

Speaker 21terrorists in the ideology of Edomar Ben-Gavir and Otzma Yehudit and Rabbi Meir Kahan and Ziav Jabotinsky. And so to your point, Ian, if you gave, I wouldn't say this blanket for all people that live in America, but if you gave founding stock Americans 25 years and unlimited resources to go to some obscure island and, you know, start their own thing, within 25 years,

Speaker 21all the Jews and their golems would be trying to come move into the country because it would be just as nice, if not nicer, as all of the so-called Roman civilizations that white European heritage has blessed the world with. America is the only nation in the world that drew from the white European heritage lineages across the globe formed its own country and its own race and told the East India Company to fuck off and beat it in a war twice. The American people are the only people who have ever told the Crown and the Jewish bankers behind the Crown, go fuck yourselves. And so what they decided to do is they said,

Speaker 21We can't win a war against the American people. You know why they decided that? Because they tried it twice and lost. So in 1843, the Rothschilds said, okay, well, we have to go long game and play the subversion route. So they created this organization called B'nai B'rith, which would later go on to create the KKK and the ADL and the Aryan Brotherhood and the Muslim Brotherhood and all of these so-called LARPing organizations that are nothing more than Jew and terror factions

Speaker 21that want to play the passive, aggressive, let's subvert from within over a long game, and then whenever we need some terror or whatever to justify giving Jews more power and more protection and more assets and more resources and stripping away the rights of white European founding stock Americans, we can do that too. And so that's why they've gone that route. And that's what Jonathan Greenblatt is. I find it funny that

Speaker 21the motivating factor for the urgent creation of the B'nai B'rith, or of the ADL rather, was the Chicago Jewish Mafia saw their Atlanta president of B'nai B'rith get righteously lynched after raping Mary Fagan and killing her and trying to blame it on the black guy at the pencil factory he worked at. They just couldn't have that.

Speaker 21It calls back to today when we can watch Tom Alexandrovich get caught right in a sting by FBI and then Seagal Chittah and Miriam Adelson and all of these illegitimate criminal Jews who have infiltrated Las Vegas and Nevada at large coordinate with the Trump administration to make sure that that guy not only doesn't get arrested, but he gets a seared flight right back to Israel before we even know the...

Speaker 21that the sting has happened. And so it's absolutely fast backwards, to be honest. And when you look at history, I know we talk a lot about culture and IQ. I know you're a big purveyor of the collective IQs of certain nations. And when you look at all of the facts on paper, I used to think that it was just out of pure hatred that the collectivist world jury, if you will, berates pure hatred of the white European race. Now I think it's a hatred that spurs out of resentment and jealousy, which is a very burning hatred because

Speaker 21They've never built a nation. They've never fought a major war that has ever mattered. They've always developed or they've always depended on already developed nations. The predominant overwhelming majority of First World nations in the world were developed by white Europeans. The predominant overwhelming majority of the major wars that were fought in the world were fought by our ancestors.

Speaker 21They can only ever gain power by subverting those nations and then using the brainpower and the military might of those white European nations to wage their wars and develop their countries for them. And I think their hatred of us comes from that realization. It's funny that you say that because I was starting the beginning of the space and I was talking about

Ian Malcolmthis very subject. And look, there are other individuals, and look, IQ is complicated, first and foremost. It's dealing with the law of essentially averages. It's dealing with bell curves. This doesn't imply that all anything is anything. There's always going to be exceptions to what I'm about to say. But IQ was one of the most heavily studied at a macro level kind of pieces of human biology over the course of literally decades.

Ian MalcolmAnd it has since, essentially, the early, let's say, turn of the century, it has been swept under the rug in this attempt to, of course, claim that anybody and everybody are all the same, right? And you obviously can't have things like IQ being drastically different between certain societies if you're going to not only make that claim that we're all one and the same, but also if you're going to try and blend everybody up together and to push what loosely we would think of as the clergy plan, because after all,

Ian MalcolmYou're probably not going to have a lot of, let's think of them loosely as just white Christian Western European individuals that are going to be excited to go and have the propagandized interracial dynamics, whatever they might be, if everybody recognizes that there are as significant of genetic predispositions in intelligence as there are in things like height. And that doesn't mean that anybody is better or worse than anybody else, but...

Ian MalcolmIt's so baffling to me that people would presume, despite all the obvious differences, and we can all in our minds, we can think of differences that clearly society tries to normalize as if they are good things. White men can't jump. White men can't dance. Well, okay. So then why is it reasonable to say that if you're going to base it on observable norms or tropes, but it's not reasonable to suggest that there is also going to be not just perspective,

Ian Malcolmperspectively, athletic differences, but also intellectual differences between groups of people. And so I talked about the idea that we can look at Mexico and compare it to, for example, the Nordic countries, and you have almost a one-foot difference in the average height of men, which is about a 20% difference. And we also know that a lot of IQ studies would suggest that, depending on how you want to talk about it, either percentage or standard deviations, but there are equally large gaps between certain groups of people. And as a last little comment,

Ian MalcolmThat doesn't mean that white Europeans are at the top of the list. And I'm happy to recognize that according to many of the studies, some of the Asian countries certainly have higher average IQs than Western whites. And I can go into how I think it demonstrates itself, how I think the creativity of some groups are different than others. But somehow it's white supremacy to talk about things like IQ, even when whites aren't at the top of the agenda. It's almost as if there's lots of people who are totally happy.

Ian Malcolmto basically say that any and everything that you point to in a category where whites might do reasonably well, well, that's white supremacy. You're not allowed to discuss that. And it's very curious because in addition to whites not being able to take some kind of pride in the fact that Western European, in particular, Western European countries do fare very, very well in the IQ category, that apparently is supremacy. But for Ashkenazi Jews to suggest that they're at the very top of the totem pole,

Ian MalcolmWell, that's just them taking pride in their people and their heritage. But the thing that's very curious about that statistic, and we did dive into it, is that, A, it's based on very few studies. Now, keep in mind, I talked about how IQ, especially at a global level, one of the most heavily studied pieces of basic biology at a macro level. But when it comes to the Ashkenazis in particular, it's basically the studies that you probably see flying around. They're usually based on one set of data that was done.

Ian Malcolmwhich was very limited in scope, which was also manipulated because it placed a heavier weight on the verbal IQ aspect, which Ashkenazis do very well. But even if you didn't want to dive into those details, what you could do is go and look at the average IQ in Israel. And you're going to find that most studies will say that it's around a 93, 94, 95. But Ashkenazi Jews are 40, well, 30 to, let's say 35 to 40% of Israel, depending on what study you're looking at.

Ian MalcolmSo that would mean that the only way that the Ashkenazi Jews could have 120 IQ is if everybody else there has basically a 60 IQ. And I would agree that perhaps Sephardic Jews and other types of Jews and other people that might be in Israel perhaps are lower than what they're saying for the Ashkenazi. But I find it really difficult to believe that half of the people in Israel are not just at a level that would be legally defined as retarded, but are...

Ian Malcolmat a level at which they would be legally incompetent if in a courtroom. And that's the only way that you can try and justify that Ashkenazi IQ, is to say that the other half of everybody in Israel is lower in intelligence than essentially a chimpanzee. So in other words, I find the idea of the Ashkenazi probably very misleading. But for some reason, it's perfectly reasonable for them to say, we're just smarter than everybody and to take pride in it.

Speaker 21But for whites to even talk about IQ in general, something, again, they're not at the top of the totem pole at, according to most data, that's somehow supremacist. And so with that backup, I throw it back to you. Yeah, I can't remember who it was that said it in the best way that I think I've heard it. It was in a space probably two months ago, my dog's barking, sorry. But they said, there are more, to give you an idea,

Speaker 21how little we actually need this, you know, cybersecurity and intelligence partner in the middle East, which Israel pretends to be. There are more 130 plus IQ white Europeans on the planet than there are Jews that exist. We literally, that one, that one, I can actually, I can get you the data. I can get you the data for that one. Cause there'll be a slight manipulation on the data I did, which is that there's,

Ian Malcolm13, almost 14 times the number of white geniuses in the world, six to seven times in the United States alone. And so then if we extrapolate that totality against the total population of Jews, I'll be curious to pull that data. That's a very interesting data point. Gee, I wonder why they want to genocide the white race through immigration.

Ian Malcolmhuh, there must be something along those lines. To add to that, at the beginning of the space, I was saying that short people tend to resent tall people. Ugly people certainly resent beautiful people, not to mention mirrors. And so if you did have a group of people that are dependent on another, perhaps are envious of either aesthetics or their work ethic, and or imagine this one. Imagine you've got a really successful, strong, attractive group of people. They're very capable.

Ian MalcolmAnd they're also very high trust. They're very warm and receptive. They're very moral. They're principled. And along comes a mangy little group of individuals that maybe aren't as productive and certainly aren't perhaps of the same type of morality or, let's say, ethical compass. It might be very easy and advantageous for that group to try and live amongst the other. And when you start to think of it through that lens, maybe everything makes a whole lot of sense. Not saying that's what's happening, but certainly a curious suggestion.

Speaker 9And to your point, too, about like literally they made a movie called White Men Can't Jump. Like imagine if they made a movie called Black Men Can't Think. Well, I don't know if that was a movie, sir. I think that was a song. No, it was. White Men Can't Jump is definitely a movie with Woody Harrelson. Oh, yes. Oh, you're right. You're right. I thought that was a song. You're right. Classic. It's a classic.

Speaker 9So what do you think? Hold on. You just hopped up here. I want to add something to what Ian was saying and what Backup was saying as well. I think they're both spot on especially with I've talked about it with the Venezuela thing. As an American, I don't want it to happen but at the end of the day as a 34 year old who likes military power we're the only white European stock American men are the only ones that can go into a fucking country

Speaker 9and within an hour snatch a leader up, rappelling down from fucking ropes, flying helicopters 100 feet above the ground. You would never see Jews do that, obviously, because they can't do that. All they can do is just genocide children and drop bombs on them. But to Backup's point, I do think there's 100% legitimacy to it, that they're like, shit, we can't do that, so they're jealous, and then that jealousy turns into anger and stuff, which we saw in...

@based__francisNational Socialist Germany 100 years ago, when nine years ago... I don't even think it's jealousy, Keith. I think it's a hate that has been going forward with generation after generation. Remember, we talked about this a lot back in our spaces. It is 3,000 years of fucking hate against European Romans, Christians, and all these tribes and all these people that treated them a certain way. That's been brought to...

@based__francisEvery family, from every family, every child, every parent taught their children this. Then why are they killing all the Muslims? Right. Well, it's a win-win for them. Yeah, pretty much. But continue, sir. I just wanted to say that. No, I mean, you're spot on. It's just, again, they saw National Socialist Germany.

Ian Malcolmand they saw white people for nine years. Hang on, real quick on that one, Keith. I think the reason that they're killing the Muslims as well is because they need supremacy over the Middle East in general in order to build out the Greater Israel Project, right? Absolutely. This isn't just a... Hang on, hang on, hang on. Doctor, we're going to go right back to you. Actually, we'll go to Wolf, and then we'll go back to Doctor. But this isn't just a...

Ian Malcolmthe Christians are in the crosshairs due to the animus. I agree with Wolf. I do think that's actually a very large part of it. But this is also, that is just one of the benefits of their, let's say, alignment and triangulation towards global domination, right? They are weaponizing the Christians against the Muslims, which injures essentially both of those groups. And as they do it, they are neutering both of them. I like my, my point I was about to make.

Ian MalcolmMy sincere belief is that what they are doing with the United States right now is the very tail end of the intentional malicious implosion of the United States as an economic and military engine because they basically recognize the gig is up. The ruse is up. They've known that this was probably coming for quite some time. The United States is effectively bankrupt. And so now what they're doing is to try and not only build their next empire, which is going to be over in this greater Israel project, if not.

Ian Malcolmprospectively Venezuela and South or Central America. But what they're also going to do is to sow, neuter, and hamstring the United States so that when people start looking around and they say, how did we go from the most powerful economic and military engine on the planet to absolute poverty in 40 years? That they're not able to look across and to realize who was responsible and then to do something about it when it comes to the empire that was built literally enslaving their people.

@based__francisHold your diet real quick on that one, because I want to add something, because you're already a little ahead of where I wanted to go, right? Let's look at it from a religion standpoint, and let's look at the Middle East, Ian, and you're making the point where we add modern days. Let's look at the Middle East. What did they do with the Muslims? Let's look at the Middle East and look at the Christian nations. They were majority Christian nations literally before the 1940s.

@based__francisWe're talking about nations like Syria, Lebanon, and all these countries that were 90%, 90 plus percent Christian. So they sucked and used up the Muslims, right, to do all the damage to the Middle East, to create all this problem when it comes down to the Christian population and then to the mass immigration problem into the Christian nations in Europe. So they used that already. They used that up.

@based__francisAnd now they're doing what you're now explaining to America. If you really look at it, they're pretty much just using people, humans, as weapons for their own fucking benefit. But what they're also doing is destroying our faith, our religion as well, which is Christianity. So I think it's...

Speaker 22Literally, that's just what I look at it. Is there anybody at all that can recognize if you see ICE officers, if you see this lineup of ICE officers, is there anybody that gives a shit about the fact of where these ICE officers are from? Most of them are white, predominantly white. Does anybody actually care? Does anybody actually care and recognize that these ICE officers are probably...

Ian MalcolmI mean, I'm going to go out on a limb and say from some southern states. Or from IDF in Israel. I really don't give a shit about that. So you don't think they're from some southern states? Hold on. Wait a second. Wait a second. Wait a second. Oh, Truman, this one's going to be wonderful. I don't know where you came from or why you're here or what your intent is. I'm going to be curious. I want you to take a wild guess. According to Grok, what percent of ICE officers do you think are white?

Ian MalcolmI would guess a majority, but... No, no, okay, define the word majority. Give me a number. 65%. Okay, so we're going to go off your metrics. I'm not even going to look on Grok. What percent of the United States is white, Truman? Well, that's not what I'm saying. No, no, but that is what I'm asking you. Can you answer my question?

Speaker 22Oh, I don't know. You go ahead and figure it out. No, no, no. Not you go ahead and figure it out. I'm not a stat whore here. I'm not a stat whore here. Truman, can you answer my question? Just answer my question. No, I'm not going to. You just said 65%. Answer my question. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Why? No, I'm going to mute you. This is going to be a fun game. It's going to make for an excellent video. You just said. Go ahead. You search it up then. How are you going through the mute button? He's got the cheat code. Yeah, that's wild.

Ian MalcolmSo, Truman, in your words, in your histrionics, you just cried out, ICE is so white. And then you said on your guesstimation that it was a majority. So I asked for a number. You said 65%. I then asked what percent of the country is white. And you're flailing around rather than answering the question. I might have an idea why that might be. So I'm going to ask you again in good faith. I'm going to presume you might be capable of such. What percent of the United States do you think is white? Don't presume anything about me.

Ian MalcolmI'm not here to be your stat puppet. Go fuck yourself. Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope. You're dodging the question. We all know why. I'm going to ask you again. What percent of the United States do you think is white? The reason I'm making this comment... Nope, I'm going to mute you again. I'm going to ask you another question. What percent of the United States do you think is white? I don't give a fuck. Nope, that is not the correct answer. I'm going to ask you another time. What percent of the United States do you think is white?

Ian MalcolmMight be double muted or thinking. You can't say you don't give a fuck. Is this a weird thing that you do to prevent white guys from actually knowing that they're being used right now? Oh, okay. We will ask another time. I don't know if this is four or five. Take a guess. What percent of the United States is white? Truman, go for it. Give me a number. The number is still go fuck yourself.

Ian MalcolmOkay, so I'm going to ask you, I think this might be attempt six. What percent of the United States is white? I can do that a hundred times, sir. Yes, and I can ask you the question a hundred times. This is going to make for a wonderful video that will be viewed by hundreds of people. What percent of the United States is white? You're not listening to what I said. You're not listening to my truth. You're not whining with me.

Ian MalcolmI can mute you multiple times. I don't know how you're getting through it. I will just remove you if you continue screaming and crying. Now, Truman, I've asked you a question. It's a pretty reasonable one. What percent of ICE do you think is white? The answer that I'm getting here, according to Grok, is a lower percentage of ICE is white than is the United States populace in terms of a percentage. What does that mean? That means that whites are actually underrepresented when it comes to their...

Ian Malcolmracial demographics in the ice makeup. That is the opposite of what you're suggesting. Now, the other thing that you threw in is, are they southern whites? Because I suppose you have a bias against southern, perhaps conservative whites. That must drive you mad. And if you're sincerely in here and you're not perhaps just a Mossad asset or agent or shill for Israel and Jews, then perhaps you are a blue-haired liberal, as they would lightly refer to you in conservative circles, if that's the case.

Ian MalcolmI'm sure that you would love blue haired men who perhaps are not straight as your ICE officers. Maybe you think they'd be very effective, which will bring me to the next question that I would throw at your direction, Truman. What percent of the military aged men who have been fighting wars on behalf of the United States, who have been lifting weights, carrying guns and putting their lives at risk? What percent of those individuals do you think of the whites are Southern white men?

Speaker 22I just want to say you've assumed so many things that are very untrue. Can you answer a single question? I'm incredibly conservative. You're assuming so many weird things, and I don't even know why you're coming back. Ian, Ian, Ian, Ian, Ian, Ian. She's blocked on my account. She's been blocked. She is not someone who's just on the road. I'm very conservative, so I don't even know what you're talking about. Why would you be blocked if you're conservative? Who's blocked? Who's saying that he's blocked?

Ian MalcolmI don't know. I don't know who has me. Geez. I don't know why you are insisting on just railroading the conversation in such an embarrassing fashion. But because I do think that this will make for a comedic clip that I will have Volek turn into a funny video with you as the perhaps butt end of the conversation. You're suggesting now that because you're conservative, that these are unreasonable critiques of you. And yet a conservative individual that is in the United States is probably going to look around and try to conserve the country.

Ian Malcolmwhich once upon a time was white and largely Christian, perhaps as much as about 90% of both of those just a couple decades ago. So the question that I would have for you as a conservative, why is it then, Miss Conservative, that you have so much conservative animus towards the conservatives that are trying to conserve the once largely white Christian Southern United States Bible Belt that I suppose you seem to have this animus against? So what is it that you take offense to of the

Ian Malcolmconservative white Christians, perhaps, in southern United States states? I can tell you. Look in the Gemrotron. Praise be to Israel. Might be double muted. So, Truman, is the thing that Uncensored has found, are you so loyal to Israel that you just hate white people? Is that what's going on here?

Speaker 22I'm not loyal to Israel. What are you talking about? You said that you are a conservative. Well, you're not loyal to Israel. Your post is praise being to Israel. The reason, sir, that I brought up ICE and Southern conservatives or Southern men is because I think, I personally think that there's this weird dichotomy that goes on whereby there's like these... Can you spell the word dichotomy, Truman? Like half men...

Ian MalcolmHalf men and trainees and stuff. Truman, I'm going to ask you a question. We're now going to play a spelling game. Can you spell the word dichotomy? Go ahead, Truman. You're not mute. How many mutes is that? It's a double mute. Can you spell the word dichotomy, Truman? I'm not your puppet. Oh, okay. In other words, you don't know how to. That's fine. Continue on. I can spell it. I'm not your puppet. Ian. You literally took something that I said. Ian. Phrase of. I asked you to spell a word that I don't. Dude, I was praising. Hey, Truman, Truman, Truman. We'll make it a little easier for you. Can you define. I was praising Southern men. How are you getting through the mute? This is unbelievable. Truman, can you define the word dichotomy for us? I was praising Southern men. Can you please. And you take.

Ian MalcolmCan you please define the word dichotomy? I'm not your puppet, sir. Okay. I'm going to presume that you can't spell, nor that you can even define the words that you're trying to use. But you've taken literally what I've said. How do you keep speaking through the mute? This is remarkable. I think that you're so bothered. And you're still doing it. I appreciate. I got the individual mute. Keith, am I missing? I mean, everyone is muted and she just keeps railroading through it. It's remarkable. Listen, Truman, I think you've done a sufficient job embarrassing yourself. I do have an ounce of pity for people, especially those that are emotionally irregulated, which I believe you might be. I'm going to ask you again. This will be the final attempt. You're saying now that you're praising

Ian Malcolmconservative men, and yet at the beginning of this interjection that you had, you were furious because it was white men, you said, that were dominant in ICE and were perhaps throwing around, I suppose, their white interests, despite the fact that, according to Grok... there's a lower percentage of whites in ICE than there are in the general population, which not only disproves the very comment that you're making, but perhaps showcases that you're ignorant on the very issues that you're discussing. So with that being said, please explain to me how you blend these two ideas together where you're simultaneously praising whites while suggesting that they're using perhaps bigotry or bias in the enforcement of ICE. Probably double muted again.

Speaker 22But yeah, please explain because I'm confused as well. If he'll let me speak, I know that every time I speak for more than three seconds, he mutes me. That was never the suggestion. I was trying to make a point. And my point is that in my humble opinion, there's a couple of things that I've noticed. I've noticed that there are a significant amount of white Southern men that are taking on this like fucking...

Ian MalcolmWhy are they Southern? Why are they Southern? How do you know they're Southern because they're white? I do not think that white Southern men should take on this fucking task. Fucking retarded. Wait a second, wait a second, wait a second. Okay, so the suggestion is that white Southern men are not fit to quote unquote take on the task that is ICE. So Truman, I'm going to ask you a different question since you could not spell nor define the word dichotomy.

Ian MalcolmCan you spell the word or define the word racism? Double, double, double, double. Three, two, one. No, no. Oh, sorry. Was it my turn? Sorry. I was sending a DM. No, my point is I don't. Wait a second. You're going to be obnoxious, rude. You're not going to follow essentially a single instruction. I don't think that white Southern men.

Ian MalcolmI don't think that white Southern men. So you're going to be obnoxious. You're going to be self-indulgent. You're going to be a narcissist. You're going to seemingly be clueless and talk about things that you don't have any idea about. You're going to claim that there's a huge bias and over-representation of a group of people that's actually underrepresented. And then when I put up with it, nonetheless, because I'm a patient man, you're going to say, oh, sorry, I'm indifferent. I'm in my DMs.

Ian MalcolmI'm going to ask you again. I'm going to ask you again because maybe racism is too difficult a word for you to spell or define just like dichotomy. So, Truman, can you define and spell the word bigotry? Double mute. Three, two, one. Dude, you literally won't even let me talk. You just keep muting me. So I will keep muting you. And if you whine and complain, I will beat you. No, define the word. Jeez. Define. This is remarkable. You're in my space. I do not need you here by any stretch of the imagination. I'm actually indulging you by even allowing you to continue speaking. I'm going to ask you again. Can you spell the word bigotry for everybody?

Speaker 22dance monkey. Don't worry. I have lots of reposts of your space for a lot of people. That's wonderful. Truman, can you spell the word bigotry? You're retarded. And Keith, I don't even know why you're in this dude's space as a co-host.

Ian MalcolmI'm going to ask you again. Pete, I know you. I don't even know why you're here as a co-host in this random douchebag talking space. I don't even know what you're doing. Truman, thank you for humoring us and coming into our little random space that you don't know how you're in, but somehow are in, which perhaps speaks more about me than it does about you. But I'm going to ask you one more time, because I'm a nice guy. Can you spell and define the word bigotry?

Ian MalcolmSorry, I was reposting your space for all of the 1488 folks. This is unbelievable. I couldn't hear you. What did you say? I'm going to ask one more time. And Truman, here's how this game is going to work. This is going to be a fun game. I'm going to ask you a question. It's going to be a very simple question that anybody with probably a fifth or sixth grade education would be able to pass. So this is going to be, are you smarter than a fifth grader like the Jeff Foxworthy show? I'll tell you what, I'll even try to do my best Jeff Foxworthy voice.

Ian MalcolmNow, the question is going to be, how do you spell and how do you define the word bigotry? And if you get it wrong, I am just going to remove you from the space. Is that your impression of Southern? I'm sorry, Truman. You are not smarter than a fifth grader. And in addition to not being smarter than a fifth grader, you also cannot follow directions seemingly as well as the fifth grader could. And so you are being removed from the room. You are also being blocked. And I will make sure that this becomes a rather funny, prospectively viral video. So that being said, we can unmute people because now we can have a civil discourse. I warned you about her. I warned you about her. Oh, no, no. But that was great. That was Wolf. That was great. It was great entertainment. Here's the best part. So here's the wild piece. That woman...

@based__franciswanted to suggest that it's the white Southerners with their bigotry while simultaneously suggesting that white Southern men shouldn't have any role of authority or power. How hypocritical can you be? Well, my question, because if she would have let us talk, my question was, hey, how do you, well, first of all, categorizing a white man to be just Southern, I was just like, Sidney, okay, so wait a minute. So because he's white-

Speaker 21He's a southern white man. White men are everywhere. So how do you say that they're southern? That's how retarded that chick is. Hey, guys. White southern man here who'd like to fucking say something. No, you can't, okay? You're not allowed to. God damn it. I was literally trying to say we've identified who she is and we were going to share this shit. She's a fucking Zionist spy.

Ian MalcolmWe're going to post her fucking name and address on here. No, no, no, no, no, no. Sincerely, white Southern man who's smarter than that fucking bitch. I want to know. We do not support any doxing. We do not support harassment. What I do find funny is that the backup was able to retrieve that kind of information. That kind of scares me. That's why she's been plucked. That's why she's a Jew, bro. It's good. It's good fun.

Ian MalcolmIt's very good fun. And you know what's so crazy is how persistent that behavior is. And look, I feel really humbled because we do have the good doctor in here with us who I think knows a good amount about psychology. I want to ask you something, Ian, though. I've been dealing with this woman, dude. We could have saved her as a headache with this freaking idiot. So I have one question for the room, right? I've been in here listening and I was just working. I was really busy, but I was listening. Dr. Rorschach, this is for you, whatever Wolf's about to ask.

@based__francisOh, shit. Really? Okay. Well, all right. Me too. Oh, shit. What? It's like, wait a minute. Wolf and I are good. Like, we cool. It's actually like to the room. Oh, it's a general question. Let's do general and then you can just take it if you want. Because, okay. It's just coming because, listen, let's spice it up a bit, right? It's been really liberal in certain talking points in here. Not pointing it to anybody particular or anything. Not judging my friends and my real friends on X, right? It's been really liberal when it comes down to the ice talk, which there's a lot of things I can't agree with, obviously. I know...

@based__francisI know all the talking points you guys are talking about. I get it. I get it. But what is the solution for the mass immigration, for the deportations, and what will be the solution for these illegals to go back? And how do you see this working? And how do you see this going forward? Because they are here. And we all know, and that's my opinion, and that doesn't mean I'm right, that Biden came in to create the problem.

@based__francisto allow mass immigration, to then have the Republicans to come in and then act like they're going to be the solution to create this complete, this entire system of left, right, and not only that, what do you call this? This is now division. The division in the nation is unbelievable. Let's just be honest about it. And it's dividing subversion, dividing the country even further, and the subversion that's happening even on social media.

@based__francisIt's insane, right? It's really obvious to everybody in here. And to then bring forward what? To have this crazy shit going on, to then say nobody's safe, to then get the military off, to then tell the citizens, like, hey, you see these people, they're acting crazy, to point the finger, to then say we need talent, to then say we need social credit score, to then say we need digital ID, et cetera, et cetera. But what is the solution to your point? What will be the way to get rid of these...

@based__francisthese illegal immigrants? What would be the way to make our country safe again and create and all these things? Not saying, not advocating for mega, but what is the solution, right? What is the way? Because all I hear is a bunch of like, oh, this and this and ICE is bad and all this stuff. But what will be the way? What is your guys' opinion on that? So anyways, I'm going to stop there. So there you go.

Speaker 17I say one thing that is definitely not the way that I believe Ian or somebody was saying, maybe it was even you that was saying earlier, and I think it's a great question. That is the question to ask, by the way, that we should be focusing on. But sometimes as I work with like neuropathological patients, and so we can understand healthy brains from the pathologic ones, you know, what's wrong so that we can see what's right in the way that we should not and cannot sustainably go forward.

Speaker 17is one in which due process and civil rights are trampled. That is a recipe for disaster. It's a slippery slope and it can cause all kinds of policy changes that none of us ultimately, that doesn't serve us as a nation, individually, collectively, et cetera. So I think that that's one of the things that is super important to think about as we're doing this. And then the question is, where are the pressure valves?

Speaker 17You know, and so I just want to throw that in. Everybody can say whatever they want, but I think that's something to sort of start with as, you know, the line in the sand that we can't cross. Anyone else wants to kind of, you know, well, you know, while I'm at the end, you know, I feel, I mean, to me, you know, they're illegal, they're brown. I don't really give a fuck. So I just want to hear more, you know, construct.

Speaker 21about it. I mean, don't ask me about it because if you ask me, you know how I will say it and I will talk about it. I'm not nice about it. I'm not nice. It's easy. You choke out the taxpayer-incentivized benefits that they get for staying here and you make it untenable for them to engage in civic life. Many of them, most of them, will self-deport. And whether that starts by reclaiming

Speaker 21control over where our tax dollars are spent or just withholding our tax dollars. If that happens, then you will see the end of the government subsidized programs that keep these illegal immigrants here. And then you go after the employers that hire them. You go after the H-1B, basically small cities that they created by

Speaker 21the Verizons and the Cognizant and to deliberately exploit like his name, Ravi Kumar from Cognizant and Arvind from IBM and the H1. the exploiting groups known as IT Serve Alliance and the US-India Strategic Partnership. So wait a minute, you think they're going to self-deport, bro? Because if they don't get any more money, come on, bro. If you remove their ability to have money and access to benefits like SNAP and WIC and things like that, Wolf, they will self-deport within three months. If you remove their ability to be employed because you arrested or indicted the employers who were hiring illegals...

Speaker 21then they're not gonna get hired anymore. What are they gonna do? Are they gonna build teepees and live off the land suddenly with no access to technology and running water and shit like that? No, they're not gonna do that. Israel literally does this to the people that, what in Israel? Their whole approach is make it absolutely untenable. Give them no government assistance, no access to socioeconomic life, no access to food and water or government benefits.

Speaker 21they end up leaving themselves. And then you use the resources, which you'd be very, very fortunate to have a bunch of, you know, Southern white men from North Alabama, where the per capita highest population of engineer density in the entire country exists, be running these, you know, re-migration operations. In fact,

Speaker 21We are so good at doing those kinds of things, they even trusted us to fucking run the space program and build the missiles that actually defend those poor little Israelis, thanks to Redstone Arsenal and NASA, which we have right fucking here. So these people, like, anytime I see somebody coming in that says... You know, I see this Southern, you know, what? Okay, Jew, shut the fuck up. You don't even live here. You're in Canada. You're five eyes. What little view you have of white people, and especially Southern white men, is framed from your 110 IQ, goyslop fucking Jew view of the world.

Speaker 21And it's all been a lie to you. So get the fuck out of my fucking face and go learn something that wasn't Schindler's List. You know what would be a good question, backup? What's there more of? More Southern white men in ICE or more IDF agents, officers, whatever you want to call it in ICE? There are hardly any white non-Jews in ICE whatsoever.

Speaker 21There are hardly any white non-Jews in positions of influence in our government whatsoever. Anybody who's saying otherwise is either misinformed or is lying. I'm happy to go line by line in the departments. It's funny, Ian, because this happens today while last night, you know, somebody just happened to chime in. mouth off to us about, you know, Jews are going to be taking care of all the white Nazis in this country. And so we're no longer playing this game like, how dare you? And let's have a whole chain where we spend, you know, the next 20 posts going back and forth with your Anon account. Let's just find out who you are. And we find out who that person is. Turns out that person's father is one of the key, you know,

Speaker 21Defense Logistics Agency executives and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Department of War. And one of the biggest COVID terrorists from the military and our entire government that literally helped Palantir kill a bunch of white people during the COVID pandemic. And oh yeah, they've already admitted that whites were overrepresented in needless deaths and hospitalization during the pandemic.

Speaker 21underrepresented in government, underrepresented in government grants, underrepresented in socioeconomic and educational opportunities in the United States, but overrepresented in deaths during the pandemic. Imagine that. And suddenly that conversation ended very quickly.

@based__francisThey're not Jews. They're browns and minorities. There's a reason why the deputy director and the director of the FBI were both brown. They're mostly brown. Some of them are brown, too. Non-white. No, I got you. I got you, brother. I got you. I'm listening to you. So they're not all IDF. No, they're not. There's about probably 25,000 IDF in the United States. You think there's 25,000 IDF in ISTA?

@based__francisNo, in the United States. See, there you go, bro. 15,000 are in Silicon Valley. I was arguing with people, dog. And that's the problem I had with these people, right? It's like we had a space, and it has nothing to do with this space at all. We had a space where people came in, they were bitching about me, saying, you know, listen, something has to happen. At this point, I don't give a shit. I faced Antifa. I faced these people. I was there. I seen their eyes. I seen who they are.

@based__francisThere might be American citizens, but these people, guys, and backup will know, Maddie understands, these people hate the fucking shit out of guys like me and guys like Maddie. They wouldn't even think twice if my child would get murdered today. They didn't give a fuck. They hate the fucking living shit out of me just for me to be proud of being in this country or being American. Just for that. Just for that. They hate the fuck out of me. So...

@based__francisDo I think it's okay to kill people? Absolutely not. Shit happened. Absolutely not. Shit happened. But I am for them using the force. Not the way that happened there, obviously. But I am for fucking... Dude, we have to go crazy against Antifa. Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization created by the Jew. It's two Jewish sides fighting each other. But what are we doing here? What are we going to do? We have to get this laptop mind virus out of this country. We have to hold these people accountable. These people have been running free and psycho for fucking ever, dude. Like, dude, I've been... Dude, they've been going after...

@based__francisgood old ladies, good old people, fucking grandpa and grandma walking through their cars, beating the shit out of them, stabbing their tires, beating their windshields in, beating their fucking windows in, breaking their cars. I've seen it, dude. If you sit here and you cry about ICE, not any of you, but if you do, and you cry about ICE, but then you don't cry about Antifa and fucking BLM and how they're treating American citizens, then you're a hypocrite.

@based__francisOkay, because there's two sides. They're the same people. Pretty much. They're the same people, Wolf. Pretty much. I get that. I get that. But what are we doing? What is going to happen? We can't let these fucking cycles run free any longer either, bro. We can't. Hold on. Can I just ask a question, Wolf? Go ahead, guys. I'm just trying to vent because it pisses me off, these motherfucking antifas. Pisses me off. So...

Speaker 21What we're advocating here is for the federal ZOG to label people within the United States, which is a Jewish PSYOP, domestic terrorists. Is that what we're advocating here? We have to go after them? The ZOG has to go after ZOG? Okay, bro. Yeah, I want zero IDF involved in anything to do with federal agencies in our country. Well, absolutely. No one here wants that. Nobody wants that. Antifa. Antifa. Jewish-created fucking PSYOP, bro. I get what Antifa is, bro. I'm going to tell you exactly what it is. They've been forever around, dude.

Speaker 21It's a consortium called American Iron Front that consists of Antifa, ADL, ACLU, SPLC, Unicorn, Riot, and CAIR. That's why they're so fucking organized and have so much money, doggy. I know. It's a composition of CIA, Israeli, British intelligence, and U.S. naval intelligence. They are Bolshevik, Soviet Jew terrorists that engage in anarchy.

Speaker 21Like they're the fucking Red Army. Exactly. Fucking 1913 all over again. Antifa need to get the fuck out of the country. They are enemies foreign and domestic. On the same side of the coin, that doesn't mean that I want fucking...

@based__francisNo, I get it. So the fucking IDF who just went and killed a bunch of Palestinians being ICE agents. You see the division in the country now. It's not division. It's subversion. I mean, the subversion in the country now where we have the problem there, then we create the solution, which is still, there's a lot of these guys that's still the problem, but then there's also patriots in there, bro. We forget that a lot of these... We identify them. That's step one. Some of the ICE agents are still patriots, right? We know that.

Speaker 19They still think they're doing the right thing, by the way. Hold on. Stop, stop, stop. We can't have this here. This is ridiculous. This is uneducated and retarded. Dude, you didn't answer the question. I asked you if you're advocating for the Zog to label United States citizens, whether they're fucking operatives or whatever, right? We're just talking the perception of what it is, because as far as the public knows, Antifa is just a wild group of liberals. So what you're advocating is for Zog, the people who are orchestrating this.

@based__francisto be labeled as domestic terrorists. Can you clear that up for me, please? Wait a minute. Okay, so see, that's the problem with guys like you. Answer the question. No, no, no, Mike. Listen, the problem is, bro, that's the subversion right here. That's the fighting we're doing now. See, that's the problem right here, dude. This is the problem. I think his point is, if they are labeling Antifa right now domestic terrorists, what is going to stop them from labeling you domestic terrorists? Yeah, listen.

@based__francisAm I the one out standing against federal agents and fighting federal agents? No, because I fought Antifa, dude. Did you fight Antifa? What do you do on Keyboard Warrior? Bro, you are Antifa. I am Antifa? Do you know what fascist is? Bro, please, Mike, stop it with me, dude. Do you understand what fascism is? Do you support dictatorship? Wolf, he's saying they're going to label all of us Antifa to justify killing us. No, what I'm saying is Wolf is in here advocating for that. That's what I'm saying. I don't think I'm going to get anywhere in here. Let's just put it that way. Yeah, go ahead, buddy. Yeah, because you can't even answer a question. No, I'm not even going to fucking answer your stupid fucking question, dude. Well, let me just say this. First of all,

Speaker 23Shut your fucking mouth, Mike, you fucking faggot. The whole word terrorist is a psyop. It shouldn't even be used. It's a label to trigger everybody into hating another group of people by the government. That being said, yes, I would be totally happy with Antifa and Zog ice agents killing each other if that's what it comes down to. Go ahead and wipe each other out. You're both my enemy. Go ahead.

Speaker 23I don't want anybody to be labeled a terrorist. It's a fucking psyop word to use against anybody that Zog wants to use it against just so they have an excuse to come after us. ICE and Antifa and BLM can all kill each other as far as I'm concerned. So that's my take on it. I'm with that. I'm with that. Maybe domestic, whatever word choosing. Well, that's my thing. This is where Mike is 100% correct.

Speaker 23We don't want to get involved in labeling anybody a terrorist. That word shouldn't even be used. But Zog uses that word on purpose to get the general public to eventually hate groups like me. They've already labeled me that. I've gotten death threats constantly for years. This is during COVID. Because my militia group were on the streets defending businesses from BLM and Antifa, doing security details.

@based__francisThey, Antifa were against us, giving us death threats. So fuck Antifa. I hope- They're calling me, they're calling all of us the same thing. I get it. I get it. I get it. Right. So I just want to say- No, I just don't like him putting me like, oh, like I'm advocating for, no, I mean, obviously nobody should be labeled, but these people are psychopaths. You literally just said that. Psychotic. Because I hate the fucking shit out of these people, bro. That's why. I have like pretty much no fucking logic left when it comes down to Antifa, dude.

@based__francisLike, these people are scumbags, the dirtiest scum off the fucking earth, bro. And I guess don't label people. I guess, whatever, if it means that we are going to be labeled, it's the same shit, all this fucking psychological bullshit. You would agree that offering Trump, who's clearly subservient to this supremacist system, offering him the Insurrection Act is a terrible idea. You'd agree, right? Dude, we are literally being pushed against each other. That's what's happening.

@based__francisThat's not a healthy thing that's going on right now. It's just not healthy. It's like, what side are we going to pick though? What side are we on? We have to be on the side of the people, but then the people that we think we are on the same side of will not agree with people like us. So we are literally a dirt party of the system that's going on right now.

Speaker 24That's the big. See, I'm kind of I get that because at the end of the day, right, like there there comes this problem where it's like, oh, well, we should all team up against Zog. And it's like, well, I'm not teaming up with all these people who support trannies and LGBT and infinite. But you'd agree you'd agree on censored. Those are just as much my enemy. You'd agree, though, that that's a I don't want to say a small, but it's a smaller contingent of the left wing traditional Democrats. Right. OK.

Speaker 24I don't—I mean, I think that we could look at some—before I answer that, I would want to go look at, like, how polling was for the left in the past, like, 10 years. Because I would argue that, no, I think most people on the left at this point support even things as far as transgenderism. Like, even if they're just giving lip service to it. But that's no different than just giving lip service to Israel like most Christians that don't know shit about it in America do.

Speaker 24Like, so both of these people are committing equal wrongs. I mean, and this is where we have to do this shit. So, right. So we, we, there's a, there's a big thing that happens, right? This, this dichotomy for a callback, right? Where you'll have people on the left and people on the right, and then you'll have people that are like JQ. But the problem that I see a lot is that when you're right wing and JQ, you tend to focus more on like global jewelry, which is what happened in Germany, right? Like these are a much farther right wing.

Speaker 24focused on global jewelry which involves one supporting authoritarianism which i do i mean i'm hitler speeches guys support hitler i support authoritarianism i support i would support a monarchy like i don't believe in like democracy or any of that i think it's all fake and gay republics are fake and gay if you look throughout history empires monarchies work way better last way longer than any form of republic and all that but then so right you have this issue where the people on the left that

Speaker 24you know, our JQ people, they kind of only focus on Israel. And they don't really care about all these secondary things that global Jewry does, like LGBT, like importing infinite browns. Like, they don't care about any of that shit. So, at the end of the day, I think the people that are more right-wing than JQ, they focus on the entirety of the JQ. They don't just focus on...

Ian Malcolmlike Israel, they focus also on the rest of the shit. So, and I, I'd agree, I'd agree with a good amount of that, but what percent of, so, so here's how I'm going to throw this out there. This might be an interesting one. Can you give me a breakdown of what percent of both Democrats and of Republicans, not, not cumulatively, but each of those two categorically, do you think would be relevant target audiences?

Ian MalcolmFor this idea of cutting ties not only to Israel, but also to this financial enslavement and also putting an end to loosely thinking of it as the absurdity of the modern version of woke. And what I mean by that is, you know, what percent of each of those two buckets? Yeah, what percent of Democrats and what percent of Republicans?

Speaker 24do you think would support essentially cutting all ties to Israel and going back to a cultural landscape that looked like the 80s or 90s? If I was to guess, right? So you come into a couple problems. I'll try to keep it as short as I can. But I think you're going to come into a couple things where like the demographics of this like quote unquote poll are going to be different. And that's going to be a few things like age is the number one. So for the left.

Speaker 24people that would support cutting ties with like, you know, financial systems and Israel and all that, there may be from like 35 and up, you may have a pretty high percentage. But once you get 35 and down, all of a sudden you have all, I would presume it's a really high percentage of left-wing people that are under 35 that do support immigration, that do support transgenderism or LGBT in general, that do support things like that.

Speaker 24So, I mean, I would say maybe you could get like 65% of the left that are 35 and up. And these are spitball numbers. I'm spitballing here, right? So like, don't hold me to this. I'm happy to change my mind. No, I think it's a really good intellectual argument, not argument, but an intellectual exercise. So I think it's probably something like 65%, maybe 70% of people on the left that are above 35 would support generally JQ stuff, right? Like generally.

Speaker 24But when you go below that, I think it's a lot smaller. So then it's probably something like 15. I would I would in my lived experience. I don't know any people that are on the left that are under 35 that don't support because there's a lot of older people like my my grandfather would call himself a Democrat. Right. But he's thinking like Kennedy Democrat. He's not thinking like.

Ian Malcolmmodern democrats well and this is why i'm asking the question because i think what you're going to find prospectively rather curious is when you go to the republican side you're almost going to find the inverse of these dynamics and what you're what you might find is that there might be more democrats that are actually open-minded to these concepts republicans well see i don't think so though because i think once you go to the lower end

Speaker 24then you have a lot more people on the right. So let's say it's 20%. I'll bump it up a little bit for the left. Let's say it's 20% of people under 35. Now, if you go to the right to get people to not support Israel, right? Like I remember seeing some polls recently that it's something like 45% of even right-wingers don't really support Israel anymore of people that are under 30, right? So if you get into this lower demographic, that's really the only thing the right has that is an actual JQ issue, which is Israel.

Speaker 24because this theological bent. There may be some smaller factors, but nothing comparing to LGBT. I put that really high up. I mean, what was the first thing that they did when they took power in Germany? I mean, they went to the sex, the transvestite hospitals and burned all their stuff. So it's a very huge part of the problem. So I don't think there's anything else.

Speaker 24Outside of really Israel, that is really the problem. And if something like 45% of younger people on the right don't support Israel, you're already bumping that number up a lot. And why does this also matter, right? So there's this secondary issue. What do we care more about? Do we care more about the older generations that are going to slowly lose power anyways? Or do we care more about the younger generations that are coming into power?

Speaker 24I keep getting a phone call. But so I think that the focus needs to be towards the right wing for the right like that. That's my opinion on it. Now, there are things that overlap, right? Like me being, you know, I'm authoritarian. I like to I'm at least relatively national socialist. I mean, I think there are things that could change in an American system like that. Like I would support nationalized health care, which is a generally left wing thing. I would support national.

Ian MalcolmRight. For like all all kids should be able to go to college if they want to. Now, what is accomplishable if we drop all four and eight? Now, uncensored, the question that I would then have is, do you think that there are well over 50 percent of the general population? If you look at both of those two parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, that if you took a hard line stance that said we're cutting all ties to Israel, we are ending every.

Ian Malcolmencroachment of lgbtism past let's say live and let live like again think 90s morality or cultural norms right you so you take that piece off the table you say we are because of our end of foreign aid we're going to be able to provide more uh in terms of support for those that are at the lower ends of the economic spectrum on and on and on i i imagine that you could win a massive country with that kind of platform yeah yeah i think you i think you definitely could um especially

Speaker 24And this is kind of where we come into this problem of, like, how long do we have left? And, you know, I don't know. I don't like spitballing where it's like, oh, we got a year left, right? Like, I don't like spitballing that type of thing. I think that in reality, they want to keep their system as long as they can. But with this rise of AI and Palantir and stuff, there's no real telling, right? Like, things could drastically change very fast. That's possible. But I think that we have an absolute victory.

Speaker 24next 10 years like i think that just demographically we will have that when you see the boomers especially when the boomers on the right all these extreme evangelicals i think as soon as they're gone the right wing will will immediately sway against israel and the right wing will basically be jq proof just about and all that has to happen on the left is a little bit more force against the transgenderism

Speaker 24because in reality you can have like gay people ish right like but i think i think the slippery slope fallacy uh isn't a fallacy on lgbt so i do think that you will slide back into it i don't i don't i think that's been proven already people were you know everyone had that uncle right like 15 years ago they're like all the gay people are getting married they're gonna animals and you know his cats and each other right like everyone that and everyone was like oh that's silly and then you fast forward and it's like you got 14 year olds getting their

Ian MalcolmExactly. But I think like what you said, Ian, about it going back to like an 80s, 90s perspective of where like, OK, if you're gay, you don't know you're gay. I think that is almost where it has to be. Uncensored, I'd be curious for your thoughts as a person that takes pretty hard lines to answer this, because I essentially have a position of you do you behind your closed doors, but you don't have to parade it down the street. You don't have to demand that I support it or accept it.

Ian MalcolmAnd the trans stuff is just a hard no, of course. But I think a lot of people would get behind that message, especially if it is accompanied by an absolute end to anything and everything that propagandizes sexuality, in particular, above and beyond, to anything that is in the realm of children. It has to go back to what Uncensored is saying. Uncensored, 80s and 90s, do what you do. Keep it behind closed doors.

Speaker 24Don't run around like a queer and promote it to everybody and make it mainstream. That's it. It's as simple as that. No, I know. I'm totally with that. This is the way. Look at the percentage of people that identified as LGBT before all the propaganda. I mean, 30% percent. And then you skip 15 years into being propaganda. Not only being normalized, but pushed.

Ian MalcolmNow it's like, what was the number like a couple years ago in 2020? I think it was something like 20 or 22% of Gen Z. Yeah, it was uncensored. It basically, and at a very high level, it essentially went from about 1% to 5% to north of 25% generation over generation over generation into the most recent data, which is essentially one in three that identifies as non-binary, whatever they want to call it.

Speaker 24define that as which is pretty because you get insane like you get a social push from doing that and that's i agree with you right if we took that you know where oh you just being gay doesn't get you a spot in hollywood you just being gay doesn't get you an ad in you know abercrombie and like i think we would i think all of that would fade away as well um because i i don't know and that's why i said earlier like

Speaker 24it may be the same for people who just vocalize on the left that they support the LGBT, the same way that people on the right just vocalize that they support Israel, not because they know shit about it, not because they themselves actually support it, but kind of just because they're towing the party line and they don't really know any better. Most people, and this is kind of, we always bash the masses and stuff, but there's a lot of people that are just...

Speaker 24they're not having a good life and they're just kind of working and they don't really have time to deal with this. Like, think about it. At the end of the day, that's the majority. That is the vast majority. Like how many people actually have time to get in the next space and talk about this or even get on social media and especially find, you know, our corner of social media or history and deal with it in a way that matters. It's not like easy. It doesn't, it's not,

Ian Malcolmall that intuitive because everything you're taught your whole life is the opposite. Well, no, I couldn't agree with you more on that. And for what it's worth, that's why it's like being on the hamster wheel. And the more they can force you to be on the hamster wheel for more hours of the day, the less time you have to look around, realize how detrimental things have become, and then to even consider not only doing something about it, but even thinking about what you would do if you knew what to do.

Ian MalcolmRight. And so that that perpetual hamster wheel is something they want us on, which it brings me. And I hate to jump the line. I normally like to make sure we go through orders. And I know Joanne has the hands, but I saw Tony down in the request panel. I wanted to bring him up because obviously differences here, perhaps in lived experiences or race or creeds or any of those kind of things.

Ian MalcolmAnd some of the commentary that I think Wolf or Uncensored were just sharing there might feel like it's somewhat ethnocentric, but I really don't think it is. I think it's like I have this kind of 90s, 80s centric view of where the world could go, that it might be better if it did. And I'd be curious for Tony's thoughts on some of those social issues. One more thing, one more thing. Since I listened to you guys talk about the percentage of the non-binaries, listen to this, my friends. In public high schools and schools in California-

@based__francisThey literally sign you up for transgender studies. For transgender... They give you a class. It's a transgender class, bro. Oh, yeah. Do you fail if you walk in and you say, I think you're all lying and wrong? I'm just saying, right? We're talking about percentages. You guys made such awesome points. I mean, I just, you guys. Do they teach the fact in that class that as of the 70s that people were put into mental institutions? Exactly. Is that left off? No, this is California for you. And we had to literally tell. So I went to school. That's my daughter's school, by the way, because she went from private school. She wanted to be in public. It's a really good school, but I had to walk in there with the wife and we had to tell him she's not.

@based__francistaken transgender studies and the way they looked at me and i was fucking dude i could ian imagine this as a parent in 2025 that you have to walk into school and they sign them up automatically so if you just a parent that just lets the kids go to school and whatever and they you know they're not going to tell the parent or whatever your kid is learning about studies

@based__francisIf you're not involved. I'll be back in like five minutes. Copy. This is how crazy things are. And this is a really... It's a good topic to have. Anyways, I'm going to shut up. I just think it's insane. I couldn't... It happened to me now in my life, in my own life, that I had to actually... I cannot even believe how far we are off track in this country. We have not just these problems with ICE and with the SOC and...

@based__francisBoth sides are the same. And like Mike and I, I apologize, Mike, for calling your names, by the way. I got a little heated because this Antifa topic is a little personal and they do piss me off. But God bless you, brother. I'm sorry. But this whole thing, it is so deeply rooted now into our society, into our system, Ian. And go help with Hans and do your thing. But it's really an important topic. And...

@based__francisWhen people say we need acceleration, how much more acceleration do we need when we already live in Weimar 2.0? That's why I disagree with the Kruipers. They're like, well, we want Newsom to be president. What else do you need? Our schools are teaching transgender fucking studies. So anyways...

Ian MalcolmThank you so much, Wolf. And did you want Ian to go to Tony for his opinions that are, I don't know? Yeah, yeah, Tony would have been next. I'd be very curious for just some of his thoughts. And I say this because, look, I'm always open arms to anybody and everybody. And, you know, when we were talking through with Uncensored, some of those demographic breakdowns, left, right, Democrat, Republican, and who would ultimately stand for essentially what... And the wildest part is it's not like it's a hyper-traditional...

Ian MalcolmWestern norm. It's just what the world looked like 20 or 30 years ago, which shows what a stark cry today is versus the, let's say, 80s or 90s when the world wasn't under assault by this insane barrage. And so I'd just be kind of curious for Tony's thoughts, his perspective, and if a group of people did step forward and started advocating for some of these cultural norms, what would be the communal response outside of the group of ideologues that perhaps Uncensored and Colin and Wolf and I would be looped into?

Speaker 25Yeah, thanks, Ian. Thanks for the space. Thanks, Joanne Key. So the question is kind of what would the ethnocentric reaction be from the perspective of minorities and things like that? Yeah, almost like you can almost think of it because ethnocentric is always going to involve kind of the ethnic aspect, but it's almost like America-centric, right? Prior to mass migration, prior to the push for all the...

Speaker 25woke LGBT ism and everything else that's in between. And maybe a return to what felt like a, a much more normal society not too long ago. Yeah. Well, yeah, even back in like the two thousands, uh, what felt a little bit more normal, but even then that was just a barrage of, of, uh, you know, trying to, uh, tear at the seams, trying to even get closer to the seam. So you can just kind of rip at them. Um, now, uh, I think that, uh,

Speaker 25the return to it is probably ultimately more white and or mixed than it is, you know, as far as the vanity of a wide range of classes and culture and Leninism and all these different proletariat values. I think that it's probably... more just based on, you know, what we were founded on. And I think that that's the way that the country should head anyway. From a moral standpoint, I think that's the only way out of this. You know, it's the way that you get out of gentrification. How do you un-gentrify usually? And a lot of those crowds will attack you for, you know, crossing the racial lines. And then, you know, maybe you join the military, maybe you join ICE or something like that.

Speaker 25which is something that a lot of those guys are against. That's probably the only way out of it. Rarely will you see, because what goes on behind closed doors, things like you share your opinion, especially in spousalhood, you have to agree with one person or the other to keep the house together. And often that's why houses separate is because of differing opinions and values. And then what happens after that separation is it's just more extreme. The woman has to be more strong in black and the black male has to be more strong in black in that same merit. So either there's going to have to be some radical change, which will probably, I mean,

Speaker 25How do you even go about that these days anyway? It's a really interesting concept. You would have to really usher them into the entire economy and something that is just an on-starter, which would be something like reparations. And that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard because that's exactly... um how california gives five million dollars if you can prove that you were a slave your family was a slave yeah yeah and they don't even fund it either and it's uh you know it's again it's a non-starter you know um there is no the only way that you're going to do this is integration assimilation uh there is there is no other other way uh to even uh start to you know uh enlighten yourself in in in a merit such that would be

Speaker 25inclusive in such a divine society. There's no other way. Especially, I mean, even if we go, let's go down the road of per se reparations and $5 million or whatever. So what we're going to, now we're going to reward you for your misaligned behavior. What's that going to do? I mean, that's basically what's happened in, I mean, and I hate to say this, is what's happening in the Middle East. You start funding

Speaker 25and providing aid to these people. And what are they going to do? They're going to just build behind closed doors, make more uprisings, and it's eventually just going to, again, tear at the seams. So while that is probably what would seem the most fast or the fastest and most viable option, it's probably, you know, as you go down that road, there is...

Speaker 25I mean, the only real way, and this is where you drive reparations, would be something like an intrinsic education system where you force these guys into some sort of programming, reprogramming. I mean, and this is what the Democrats want, right? You strip them of their guns, you strip them of their most delicate and sacred values, and you kind of just turn them to,

Speaker 25what it means to be an American. Um, and that's, I mean, it's, it's an ugly thing to talk about, but, uh, it's probably, that's probably the best way to really, uh, go about it. Um, because there is no, there is no other way, uh, to, to, to drive that sort of change. Um, I think that it's gone too far, um, you know, back in, back from, uh, you know, 2012 and 2013 and all of those, what we did was we just, we, uh, just put a bunch of weapons in their hands and, and, uh,

Speaker 25That was what, per se, we would call Obama's old militia is these Blacks in South Side of Chicago. That's why you have the memes or had the memes back then of South Side Chicago. That's where they get all the guns coming across the border, all the different gang culture and gang violence and all these people that have absolutely no idea what's going on outside of their own little specter.

Speaker 25You know, it's all because and even once you get into that specter, all they talk about is liberalism. And if you try to if you try to leave the liberalism, then you essentially, you know, get the old guillotine. So these are the things that go on behind closed doors. There's no there's no other way other than reprogramming and saying, hey, you know, you don't have to be alone in this in this race. There's you know, there's plenty of as you guys were mentioning, white southerners.

Speaker 25that also believe that people should have guns, that you should be able to provide for your family and defend your land, defend your space. And you don't have to go out about it alone. And that there is some sort of subservient behavior that should be had behind closed doors where the basis of merit should be matched. But

Speaker 25but you don't have to necessarily have explosions because of it. You can love this person while still disagreeing with them. I think that's something that is obviously missing in those kind of sectors. And then even all the way down that line where they do finally integrate and assimilate into some sort of non-identity society or whatever that they're looking for on the left, right? You know, where maybe you do have these sort of thoughts or whatever you call them, these multipolar, multicultural, all of these different, you know, crazy...

Speaker 25schemes where i can be an airplane and fly in the sky and then come back down and be a flower or whatever but on the merits of of your relationship you know and that's where um you know you can have your fantasies you could have all of your all your different things uh uh in your normal life but you don't have to go outside the bounds and try to influence these onto um other americans who don't

Speaker 25who don't want these values amongst their children, amongst their people, amongst their peers, let alone the workplace or, you know, just out in the public eye. And, you know, it's just this rag-polletariat, this bottom-scraping, bottom-feeding, you know, pay me to be... Pay me to be... oh, what's the word that we use here? Like divisive, pay me to be subservient and noncompliant. It's that kind of attitude that kind of got us here in the first place. And that's kind of where, and then let's backtrack it here. That's where this merit-based relationships would eventually intertwine. Because if you can go into the house and say, hey, I like these things, but we have to keep this within our own,

Speaker 25a relationship within our own household. And then you guys go outside and, you know, everything's kind of fine. You know, you don't have to necessarily go out there in your freaking rainbow skirt and freaking flowery eyeglasses. You can go out in your normal clothes and no one will know the difference between you and another person. And this is kind of where those social class lines start, you know.

Speaker 25This is where normal society begins to reap its benefits. Now you can go to work. You can actually have a profitable event there. You don't have to go in there and say, hey, I'm black, I'm gay, I'm this, I'm that, I'm the other thing, and all this bullshit. You can go in there and you can say, hey, I'm here to work. I want to provide the most value and effort I can, and I want to be a benefit to the company.

Speaker 25And then the employer can then look at you and say, thank you for your work. They don't have to say, well, this guy is black, he's gay, he's this, he's that, he's the other thing. And this is why we hired him. Which makes absolutely no sense because it's not based on any merits. It's based on how much can we say we're diversifying and keeping...

Speaker 25the culture open to all these different groups of people. That's probably where a lot of the economic downfalls are. And that's probably why we're still sitting here on Twitter freaking 20 years later and wondering why this platform still sucks. And that's a whole different story. I mean, man, you can rip this thing to absolute shreds. It's kind of ugly on the other side of it. Say one more time.

Speaker 25Say what? Um... Um? Yeah, I'm just messing with you, brother. Continue, continue. Sorry, yeah, I'm trying to... But also, please, please lend it to him. Thank you so much, Tony. I'd love to. Yeah, I'm just trying to, you know, keep it all together and share my immediate thoughts, you know, because there's a lot of them. And, you know, it's not like...

Speaker 25I have all these things just written up and queued up for you. I have to, you know, kind of go into the, into the piggy bank of, of, you know, what I've came from and what I've seen from, from, from the standpoint of being black or whatever, you know? So back to the topic, the destruction of logic and science. I think that

Speaker 25what you guys are talking about here kind of drives the whole thing. You're, you're, you're talking about, uh, gay people and, and, and, and mumping it all in with, with all these different ideals and, and, and, you know, you're talking about Jews and, uh, how, uh, uh, Z's are all, all this and all of these guys are all the same people. It is destruction. Tony to pull that apart. So, uh, would you agree? So, well, let me ask it this way.

Ian MalcolmOut of a thousand people, how many do you think would be homosexual? And then how many would be of the belief that they are in the wrong gender of body? Again, out of a thousand, what would you think? Just without any programming, any propaganda, any anything. What do you think would be the breakdown? Zero. You think zero? I don't think that anyone would be. Okay. Yeah, absolutely. There's no reason in the perfect world where, especially,

Speaker 25with the numbers being two to one female to male. There's absolutely no way in the world. I think that in that perfect world, each male would end up with multiple wives, which is how it used to be. Interesting. I'm surprised there's not a base coming from Wolf or something along those lines because it's a pretty traditional view. I would actually, of a thousand just on an island by themselves, I presume there'd probably be a couple.

Ian Malcolmthat would be homosexual. I think there'd probably be zero, if not, out of 10,000 or 100,000, perhaps one that would identify as trans. No, but I mean, look, people will debate that one. And the reason that I caveat it is because my objection is not to, I suppose, anything that is within natural order, right? As a chaotician, I suppose. That which is...

Ian Malcolmfrom mother nature, I think is the way that things should be. And I do, I have a bias to believe that there's probably some very small subset of individuals that would just naturally be inclined to be homosexual, but that the thing that I take offense with is the society programming and socially engineering the world to look a certain way, which is clearly resulting in all sorts of kind of dystopian cultural norms that we find ourselves in today. And those are the things that I find

Speaker 25not just egregious, but I suppose offensive. But curious for your thoughts, John. Yeah, I think in the absolute sense, I think in the absolute sense that there would have to be some, there would be one large tree that's broadside of the ground, per se, and then the rest are just grass, and they're all equal. I think that's how Mother Nature would derive it anyways. But the...

Ian Malcolmthe intuition still lies. I think that in this, in this perfect world, in this perfect context, I don't think anyone, uh, would, would be forced to, uh, uh, become homosexual or anything like that. Yeah. And that's, that's the thing. I mean, we look around and that's why I bring up the 1%. And, uh, you know, if we go back to even the eighties and nineties, there was certainly a subset of, uh, that lifestyle and to each their own. It was just, it was something that was, uh, I suppose, socially not, it's not just not accepted.

Ian MalcolmToday, it's revered. It's essentially thrown into the spotlight. It's romanticized. That's the right term. I think you're talking about the 60s, brother. Like, more like, let's say... It's all dividing. Let's say 60s, maybe 65, 70, where a gay man would have still had to be married to even live. You know what I'm saying? And that's my point, Wolf, is that even in the...

Ian Malcolmthe 60s, there was certainly some subset of people even living in that society that would have very much so frowned on that lifestyle that still would have pursued it, which would, it leads me to think that there's some small subset, again, it's probably less than 1% or so that just naturally will be inclined for such. And if that's the case, then so be it. The programming and engineering is the thing I take, again, massive offense to. And we see that in modernity, not just when it comes to sexuality, but of course, lifestyles, degeneracy,

Ian Malcolmbinge drinking, all these things. And to give another example, I mean, you can look at the United States where binge drinking was a cultural norm. Going back about 20 or 30 years, it became a huge problem. And prior to that, in Europe, was virtually unheard of, right? You had lots of kids that would drink, Italian kids that were drinking wine, you know, before they could learn to maybe understand the drink that they were imbibing, right?

Ian MalcolmAnd they were able to do so somewhat respectfully. And now you fast forward to today where American norms are now largely the norms of Europe. And now you have binge drinking all across there as well. So these things, you know, it's very clear to me. And I think this sincerely has been just an orchestrated plan decade after decade, generation after generation. And whether it's Animal House all the way up to whatever is the newest slop fest that pushes the same.

@based__francisdegeneracy aimed at the younger generation. Don't you also think, and that's a good question for you, because I love the way you think. I understand where you're from. But isn't it also our fault or the people's fault for allowing it? Isn't there a standard of it might be there in your face, but isn't it also something like nobody made you do it, nobody forced you to do it. We kind of just accepted it and we went with it and then we allowed it to happen. That's why, and I'll be curious for doctors' thoughts on this as well, because

Ian MalcolmMy belief is basically what they've done is generation after generation, they taught the younger generation that the one prior was old, it was square, right? Like, you could almost go generation by generation and find the word that they aim to weaponize against the prior generation as they normalize the new thing. And it wasn't that long ago that, I mean, Elvis Presley, they said, we're only going to film you from the waist up.

Ian Malcolmfor sure, performance because we're afraid of what might happen if we don't, right? That was not that long ago. But what they did was they taught the younger generation that Elvis is cool and anybody that thinks it's not is square. And then fast forward generation after generation after generation. And I mean, it wasn't that long ago that Britney Spears and Madonna kissing at one of the video awards or whatever it was, the music awards, that that was extremely controversial.

Ian MalcolmAnd yet not even a decade later, well, maybe it was a decade later, you had the two rap women, I can't remember who they are, literally grinding on stage as if they're strippers. And that's the new degree of debauchery, right? Like a kiss between two women, that was earth shattering. And now just women grinding up against each other, practically nude. That's just another day in Hollywood, right? So you can see how generation after generation after generation, they just keep dropping the bar.

Ian MalcolmThey keep romanticizing it to the younger generation that is obviously very impressionable. And it's the last thing, and again, doctor, I'm going to be very curious for your thoughts on this, because it was Orwell himself who said it was the women and the children that were the mouthpieces and the spies of the machine. And I really do believe that if you think about it, women can be, I think, more manipulated by emotion than men. That's not an all women are anything statement. It's just a...

Ian Malcolmin general. And then, and then if you think of it, so women can be pulsed with heartstrings and children can be misled by what they perceive to be hip or cool. Right. And so earlier in the space, I was talking about how the black community was largely instructed that it's cool to have your pants down around your, you know, whatever. And yet that came out of literally the prison system.

Ian Malcolmwhich was a thing that men would do to signal that they were open to other men doing all kinds of bad, let's say gross things, right? And so the pop culture is able to take even something that those men that were now imitating that form of presenting themselves, right? The exact inverse of what they thought. They thought they were being masculine by literally doing that, which was...

@based__francisErotic amongst homosexuals, right? It's crazy. I think it's even deeper rooted, Ian. When you look at the fundamentals of a family household, let's go to the 50s and 60s, where dad would work a little bit, but mom was at home the whole time. They had standards where they were not able to brainwash their brains as much as we have today. Through the century, like through the years, what happened? Inflation went up, right? It's like the system did a perfect job. Inflation went up.

@based__francismore and more people had to work longer hours. The man couldn't afford it anymore on its own to just keep working alone. And the woman had to start leaving the household as well to work as well. And what happened then? When they push feminism, you need to get a job, woman. That's where I kind of see...

Speaker 25where the infiltration, where the subversion, where the psychological manipulation happens. If I may finish up real quick, the concept that we're describing isn't necessarily socialism. It's more of a federalist. It's a government by the people, for the people, all full of people. We haven't really had the structure to do something like this up to this point. I'm not going to boast technocracy or anything like that, but I think that...

Speaker 25Technology is the structure that was required for such a thing. You're not going to oppose? You like technocracy? Excuse me? You're not going to oppose technocracy? I said I'm not going to boast. I was going to say, I thought he said boast, yeah. Oh. So he's not going to brag and push technocracy. Yeah, I'm not going to shill for technocracy.

Speaker 25Sorry, I understood a pose and I was like, why? No, never mind, go ahead. I mean, in the literal case of technocracy isn't necessarily a bad thing. It does inherit some sort of federalist values where everyone can be included without the need of representatives or schemes or shields from the inside. Everyone would know what was going on. Thanks for allowing me to speak, guys.

Ian MalcolmWell, thank you, Tony. All right, Matty, go for it. Yeah, go ahead and skip me because I can't even remember now what I wanted to say. I am sorry. Thank you so much for your patience, Matty. And just really quickly, and we'll go to Rayid right after. I'm kind of curious for Dr. Roshang's thoughts on this idea of propaganda and in particular.

Ian Malcolmuh women with emotions and and children perhaps because they they want to blend in with pop culture or however you want to define that but the the ability to manipulate the minds i'd be curious for your thoughts and that's that's i think the most important one that's the most important one go ahead doctor i cannot wait to hear what you think about it because that's how they conquered us good absolutely

Speaker 17I think one of the most important things is that we truly underestimate how strongly we are driven biologically. I mean, people think about mind control as like this big thing that's happening, and it's just a lot simpler than that. In particular, children and adolescents, what you were saying, Ian, they are really vulnerable to propaganda. Okay, so the first thing is that propaganda becomes more effective on people as they lose their economic status, which we are seeing happening.

Speaker 17least in the us and so and people that would have been more resistant to it all people grown men uh become more subjected to it more they are more receptive to it sorry and then when you talk about children and adolescents then they're actually much more vulnerable to propaganda and to what is known as the you know wanting to fit in so the norm so norm manipulation is really important because kids brains are still wiring the systems that are responsible for things like belonging and identity right so up until the age of seven what's really important is what your family

Speaker 17is teaching you what your parents are saying and then you get above that and it's about peer group identity and belonging and that connects to the importance of risk assessment socially right so when when kids are young um they're not thinking about like is this true or is this good like we might as adults but what they're thinking is is this going to help me fit in right

Speaker 17Am I going to be accepted by my peer group? And we know how important that is at those ages. So, and like you're saying, as soon as all the kids come in, I forget who was saying that earlier, just a little while ago, that in their daughter's school, that as soon as the kids go in, they're in this transgender course and you have to actually know about it. And it was me. Yeah, it was me. Right. So you have to go in and you have to...

Speaker 17you know, say, I don't want my kid in this. And then then your kid has to face the other kids that are like, why are you not in there and what's wrong? Because my parents were very strict and, you know, they were always watching over me, although they kind of let me do what I did at school. But, you know, they were very they were very present to what I was learning and what I was going to be, you know, how I was going to be behaving in the world. And but a lot of parents just assume that schools are going to do the right thing and they're taking care of the kids and so on and so forth. And they don't see it as a an institution for indoctrination.

Speaker 17So if you shift that one thought alone, then you put together the biology of developing brains and the bio psychology of children, then you see that the blending in is something that can easily be capitalized upon because it's not something that is a weakness, it's a survival strategy and we all have it, but especially kids at that time.

Speaker 17so mostly throughout human history we know that social rejection meant real danger if you were isolated you had a greater chance of dying right so this is why we have tribalism so but our systems now are very much exploiting that and the propaganda that kids are are looking at is you know despite being overt right um it's also operating through culture

Speaker 17You know, this is how we do it. Like you said, this is cool. These are, this is funny. You know, there's this whole signaling that's happening very aesthetically, very subtly. So that our attitudes, kids' attitudes, even more so, but our behaviors, our attitudes, our identities are what? Are being shaped by music, by Hollywood. Ian, you've got the stats on all of how that's being run. So I'm just going to stop about the influencers there. But, you know, memes, advertising.

Speaker 17And of course, social media. So what's normal and cool and expected is what kids are going to learn like that. Right. So their beliefs and their behaviors are going to be very much connected to what's being approved and who's doing the approving. So I think that's something that's really important. And then, of course, you know, the flip side of that is.

Speaker 17Will I be isolated or will I be ridiculed? Okay, we're adults. How good does it feel as adults when we're being ridiculed or isolated, right? So your brain, it's job number one is your survival. And as you're developing, even more so are you susceptible. So just put it all together and you see that what once was a norm before now gets changed as a slippery slope.

Speaker 17by social enforcement, starting with kids, which is why now there's a lot of focus on the younger generation, because they're the ones who are going to be running the world. And so everything feels now no longer imposed, but chosen because it's being subtly brought in. And this propaganda in particular is so egregious. Why? Because it is bypassing our conscious reasoning and appealing to us at a much more

Speaker 17fundamental level, which is our need to survive. And especially as kids are socially evolving, which also is very important for their survival. And I can talk about play and all this stuff and testosterone. They're very much connected. But you bring all that in and you've got this perfect storm. And last but not least, I will say that do not underestimate repetition. In particular,

Speaker 17For us, because we're like, we're adults. You know, we can decide. But basically, if the brain can process something, it takes it to be true. If it's repeated and becomes familiar, that familiarity not only creates acceptance, but creeps in as belief. And belief is what drives our behaviors. I said a lot. I can say more, but I'll stop there. I would say repetition is the father of learning. I love what Dr. said. I mean, this goes social media.

@based__francisplus the school, plus the social pressure, plus having that one friend in your circle that is accepting of the degeneracy of the gay guy, of the gay girl, of the transgender girl.

Speaker 17That gets redirected as you're just being compassionate and accepting. Because we're taught as children to be loving, to be kind. Be nice to your sister. Be nice to the neighbor's kid. So if you're excluding them, you see exactly what you're saying. You see how it can be easily manipulated, especially for kids. That's why I think Facebook and some of those social medias are so bad. The grass is always greener on the other side with young kids and stuff. And that's why you get kids that will be...

Speaker 915 that'll drink half a bottle of whiskey and then get blackout drunk because, like the doctor was saying, they want to fit in, obviously, and be accepted. Like she said, it's the primal instinct. It's called moral inversion, basically. Yep. Parents just need to be better in this country, to be honest. That's the thing. They have to be much better at being strict or whatever you want to call it with their kids.

Ian Malcolmand making sure they don't get on the wrong path, especially nowadays with social media. Yeah, but Keith, that's the thing, right? And that's what religion used to do. It used to be the bulwark against the parents that weren't able, for whatever reason, to put those guidelines, right? Instead, now, the parents have to basically protect against an endless onslaught of the insanity to try and provide some degree of reason.

Speaker 9Hey, Ian, you know what's interesting is that in a population that is no longer reproducing and is feeling isolated and lonely, guess who's having kids and who's thriving? Those people who are of religion. Statistics. Amen. That's why I'd always say what's uncensored, then back at JQ, like whether, you know, I obviously don't believe Adam Green, but you can take his argument, you know, whatever, say it's right. But Jesus, all that shit, whatever. But just the morals of religion.

Speaker 24And I talk to Colin about it a lot all the time. That alone, in my opinion, is such a massive W and outweighs anything else, especially atheism. It's not even close. Well, that's why you have seen, right? I mean, if you, I don't know how into, you know, religious dialogue everyone was and, you know, about 2008 through 2019, 2017 with the new atheism movement, right? You had all these guys. Dawkins and all those guys. You guys remember? Yeah, yeah. Dawkins, Sam Harris, all them.

Speaker 24they would come through and be like okay look religion's just evil we have to get rid of it and then on the other side of that we'll have this you know humanitarian um you know agnostic utopia right that's that's what's waiting on the other side and what happened nothing they they they they swamped religion in a lot of europe there's a lot of a lot of people that were you know progressing in that age period that wound up agreeing with that

Speaker 24And then now we have what in a lot of philosophical circles is called the crisis of meaning. There's so many people now that have no idea. They don't know what they're doing. They have no idea for meaning. And now you have Dawkins even in the modern time recently saying things along the lines of like, well, I'm a cultural Christian, and I think Christianity does have good things to it. I just don't think it's true. And it's like, well, at the end of the day –

Speaker 24if it is producing good results, I think, you know, and, and the opposite is producing bad results. I think maybe just drop it and allow the good results to prosper, but whatever, you know, all that may be, you know, I think it's bought on and center as well with the meaning thing. Cause in terms of universal basic income, now they call it high basic income, like an AI taking over a lot of jobs, like

Speaker 17Yeah, you could get paid whatever you want, but if you don't have a job meaning in life and you just sit around all day, that in and of itself is going to make a lot of people, unfortunately, kill themselves. Well, we have right now 1 billion people who are sick with mental health, according to the World Health Organization. And it's actually now one of the leading causes, if not the leading cause, it is in fact actually, as I remember, the leading cause of death among young people.

@based__franciskids and this is and this comes right back this comes right back actually well fuck the vaccines let's look at what we just spoke about with ian and doctor and what we talked about when it comes down to the you know progressive woke mind virus the uh the gay stuff the the transgender isms all the isms of the world and allowing man to be woman and want to be man and that is actually a mental health crisis because these people actually need help

@based__francisThese people have actually been let down by not just their families, their mother and their dad, but by society. And we allowed this to happen.

Ian MalcolmThis should have never happened. We'll take it a step further because think about it. It's the parents who can't provide adequate support because they got to work two jobs just to be able to afford the small home that they're able to put over their heads. They can't afford healthy food. So the kids get essentially poisoned their entire life from the inside out. Then they not only get the culture, the music, the TVs, but they go to a school that just like you were saying now in California normalizes this stuff.

Ian MalcolmThen if the parents speak out against it, the parents are bigots, so the kids have to be taken from them. And then if the kid does go in for a mental health evaluation. The parents are going to be told, well, your kid is dealing with depression because they're the wrong gender. We need to fix them. And if you don't, then we're going to take them away for that purpose. And then so the parents are left to basically sit around and either be the bigoted, conservative, anti-semitic, whatever the slur is, or to watch their kid go down a path that in many cases, like we talked about at the beginning of this space, that one of the few groups that has more suicide per capita than pre-op transgendered people or post-op transgendered people.

Ian MalcolmSo you're going to take a group of people that are already in this depressed mindset that perhaps have all these confusions because of the social signals that they've been getting, and now you're actually going to offer them prospectively a surgery that's going to make them even more confused in the aftermath. So every turn of the system is designed to turn the things on its head while minimizing, harassing, heckling anybody that has a religious frame because obviously anybody that's a person of God is going to look at modernity and say, what the hell is going on? This is not...

Speaker 17heaven on earth, we're being ruled by Luciferians or demons or whatever you want to call them. So I like what you're saying, but I'm going to, may I gently expand that out a little bit in two ways. One, you're assuming that the parents, and you're right, keeping the parents busy and disconnected from their kids is really important. But let's just take that out into the bigger picture. Two things. One,

Speaker 17The family unit has been systematically broken up. It went from extended family to nuclear family to divorced and blended families to every man for himself. Right. You know, this this systematic breakdown. I was just going to say that this systematic breakdown is not incidental. This hyper individuation narrative that the U.S. has been pushing.

Speaker 17has led us and has gone even further to sort of like this self-definition. You know, what am I? You know, I choose to be whatever I want to be. And this is like liberating and courageous and modern. And, you know, but the problem is if you tear down a structure and you don't replace it with another infrastructure. then the brain just goes wild. That's why we're breaking down. So this rise of self-definition is really an assault on the brain and the body because we fail to function in this. And parents can't teach what they don't know. If the parents themselves are the adults that are the victims, if I may say, not that we're victims, but if they're the ones who have subscribed to all of this, how are they passing anything down to their kids? They can't.

Speaker 17And in fact, it gets even bigger because now every coach and yoga teacher and I heard somebody saying, you're not going to mindfulness your way out of this. And that was absolutely true. This is what's going on. And then we throw in psychology, which, by the way, didn't exist in like ancient Greek, Roman or Persian culture, any of this. And and that they promote the individual and they're the ones who are there to co-regulate you and tell you what's OK. And all they're doing is sitting there listening to you.

@based__francisfocusing on everything you're confused about doctor on psychology just go we don't have to go back far 50s 60s i know but i wanted to say that the root of human civilization right remember how it was looked at doctor back then like in the 50s when you said when you were married and you said my wife has seen a psychologist it was almost like you're saying my my wife is a

Speaker 17going to a mental health institution or mental health hospital or something, right? But moderation, and this has also led us to this modernity, you know, balance is a really important thing. Moderation makes sense. You go to almost any scripture and extremism is frowned upon. But then that has been taken and manipulated to pull us away from religion. By the way, I'm not pro or against religion, although personally, I think what has happened is religion has become something that serves the purposes of man because it's a power play and not the messages that have been coming to us from those who are the real deal. But modernity...

Speaker 17and this is the key, has taken the place of that religion. So the infrastructure that's been torn down is now being replaced. Who's the new priestly class, right? The psychologist, the influencer, the whatever, the coach, the blah, blah, blah. So we actually haven't really let go of religion as it were, just the one that really helped to support us and have us...

Speaker 17get to better, be better, and evolve rather than devolve. Now you've got the Andrew Tate's and the Jordan Peterson's as your new priests, as it were. That is so well stated. I don't come up with this stuff. Great role models. I just keep upgrading my education and I pass on whatever I learned. But this is what we are now saying is the good and the true and the beautiful, whereas the good and the true and the beautiful has been basically erased.

Speaker 17So you have a charismatic leader who's now your new cult leader, who's now your new priest, and this is your new religion. And your new religion, as opposed to real religion, is leading you, as you said, Ian, straight to hell. And we see that in mental health. So we have real markers for this. We see that in the rise in mental health. We see that in the rise of people taking their lives, you know, self-ending.

Speaker 17We see that in the, what's it called, the age of, I talked about this a few years ago, the age of average, where everything that you look at, from movie posters to the design of your cool cafe that you like, to the logos that cars are using, they're all... coming to be the same and the ways that we were able to connect. And that's what we need to thrive. We need to feel connected. But everything that allowed us- Architecture too is huge. Sorry? Oh, I was just saying architecture too is huge. I think that losing that beauty of older architecture really did a number for people. Absolutely. If you look at everything that was beautiful, and beauty is not extra, we are wired.

Speaker 17I'm telling you this as a neuroscientist. We are wired for beauty as babies. We recognize symmetry as beauty. So beauty is something that is hardwired in our brains. And then so we go from beauty to ugly and from somewhere to nowhere. Where are we? We're nowhere. We're just floating around. It's OK. So we are gaslit so badly that that our own existence is making us unhappy. And that's one of the.

@malleusigdoctor one of the things that i always i always notice i talk about is that how the the forces that mold our culture seem to be hell-bent on dragging a certain portion of us back to the stone age if you look at if you look at like the the morality that's been taken away from us like the like the whole greed is good thing in the 80s and how

@malleusigmarriage and devoted relationships have been turned into this kind of hookup culture. Yeah, they look down upon like, what's wrong with you, right? Yeah, everything is being dragged back to like 200,000 years ago. And the best example that I can give of this is the black beauty ideal that's being pushed is literally the Venus of Willendorf. If you go back and they found this in Vienna, they found this totem

@malleusigof this this fertility totem and uh she's basically she's basically lizzo she's this hugely overweight woman with like the one with like a hundred yeah and it's like it's like basically she has like a vagina and breasts and she's basically in no face and it's basically prehistoric porn right and but like back then that was the beauty standard because you needed a fat woman so you have a lot of babies and she was you know fertile and able to survive

@malleusigAnd we're being dragged back to that. So whatever is controlling our media and molding it is trying to prompt us to find that attractive again. I think what's happening is we are our gods. Let's just talk about God for a second. So the Stone Age, what did we worship?

Speaker 17And then we sort of evolved and we found a God. And then the age of enlightenment, which was quite the contrary of what it was, was not us being enlightened, but us understanding science and then replacing materialism as our God. The thing that you find, every single one of you, even if you're like, I believe in God or I don't or whatever, your God is the thing that takes your priority. That, you know, is it your family? Is it money?

Speaker 17Is it, what is it? And most people's God has become something that is materialistic. Materialism, which is hilarious because according to physics, we went from the indivisible unit of the atom and everything was the same in the world. It was the atom and all things were made of this one indivisible unit, which then we realized could be divided. And so we found electrons and protons and so on and so forth. And that went down to quarks and we're like, wow. And quarks actually...

Speaker 17There's energy and then there's matter. But matter has weight. Quarks don't have weight. How do they exist? OK, so the standard model of the universe is already starting to get blown out. And then you go from that to feel. So as you keep going deeper and deeper into what is matter, it doesn't exist. And yet we now have materialism as our God. Materialism leads us to the nihilism. The nihilism is leading us to the hedonism. What is the hedonism leading us to? Do whatever you want. And that leads us to addiction and death. And here we are.

Speaker 9the forehorse of the apocalypse. And now you get idolatry where everyone loves Donald Trump and certain people, whatever side, left side, right side, whatever side you're on, you just love no matter what and pick your side. And by the way, it's been a while. Hope you're doing good brother and hope the family's all well and everything.

Speaker 17So people aren't bad. People aren't stupid. They're biologically driven and that's being used against us. So instead of supporting ourselves, like I talked about the ancient Greek and Roman and Persian cultures, I'll just go with the Greek and the Persians. We cared about art and beauty. We cared about knowledge and science. We care to improve and to understand. And that.

Speaker 17was part and parcel of what was known as good and the government or the social systems were supposed to support it. We lost that. So people are lost. It's that, imagine your body without a skeleton, you'd just be a blob, you can't function. So it's- So doctor, I gotta ask you a question because on that piece that was lost, I'd be very curious if we were, even without naming said, let's say power triangulation, if instead we were just to say,

Ian MalcolmSo... So...

Speaker 17i think that there are two things going on i think there's intention and what's actually sorry let me turn off the other phone i think there's intention and i think there's what's actually happening that you know you mean to do one thing and then it gets out of control so um getting the most important thing is getting us to be compliant why because the less resistance to any strategy that you have and a strategy is for you to get to a goal the faster you're going to get to your goal

Speaker 17So as long as we are unable and or unwilling to act, then there's less resistance. The default, I'm going to make this really simple. The default mode of the brain in the face of chronic stress, which we know we're all living through is passivity. So we want to do things, but we don't. And so they can say things like, be prepared to show that you're a citizen. And you're like, that's crazy.

Speaker 9but then you don't actually do anything about it. And then people will say, that's totally acceptable with me, totally normal. But real quick, I want to go to Raid real quick. I know he's been waiting forever. Do you want to go to Raid real quick, Ian? Go ahead, Raid, brother man. Yeah, thanks. No, it's not a question of waiting, actually. I'm loving it.

Speaker 26almost 1.30 in the morning, and I know my brain will switch off, but because the topic is so fascinating, it is so interesting, and thank you, Ian, again. This is the quality space where we all need to be. So thank you. And I love it when I find Wolf, Colin, and Keith in one space. You're like the first friends I made on this platform.

Speaker 26coming to social media to discuss, you know, Lebanon and Israel. And then I meet people who are awake, you know, to the tribe and the shenanigans of the tribe. It was amazing. Anyway, let me say something. Look, I actually haven't woken up a long time ago to a layer of things that the average person doesn't. Just my mom gave me the first book she gave me was The International Jew.

Speaker 26of Henry Ford, I was 16. And having also been bound by playing the Star of David when I was 12, so I had to question a lot of things. So when I look at the American society, understanding the level of conspiracy that this tribe has against population and the control that it had in the United States especially, I saw things from the perspective of the social engineering

Speaker 26aspect of that they call it the blank slate because americans mostly got deracinated from from from the ancient culture let's say if they were europeans so it was very easy to do this social engineering experiment that was running and let me say this and i can argue it nothing nothing was organic culturally and socially. Nothing was organic. It was from the beginning. If we study the history of the schooling system, which schooling system they decided to install within the United States and how the decision was made, 1910, I'd go. And then the other thing that they were very able...

Speaker 26very successful in doing through the schooling system first. Now, before television, right, before television, hardly radio, they decided, and like Wolf said something very important, his children, his kids are being asked to be enrolled in an academic thing called transgender studies. Not only are you being asked for IE, they're being automatically enrolled. Yeah, unless the parents, yeah. So these people are, this is an example that these people can create academia, academia out of nothing, all right? So I would point to what they were able to do successfully is to tell us that science says that there is no God.

Speaker 26happened to have where there was a cell underwater, and suddenly it came alive because of the environment, and then other cells gathered with it, and eventually after millions of years, we became a creature that crawled out of the ocean, and then the monkeys, and here we are. These people, and I studied, I looked at that. Trust me, guys, it took me three years to establish or...

Speaker 26or deny the presence of a creator. And I had to look into that. So these people were able to tell you early on in school, take your kids and tell them, no, there's no God. Science says this is how we came to be. Then fast forward to the 50s and the 60s, the advent of television. And this is when every family, they had access to each and every family, each and every household with a screen.

Speaker 26that can tell you everything they wanted to tell you. And then also what they did, because I want to be brief, they weaponized empathy. They weaponized the human thing that we have. And then suddenly in the 60s, they told you, oh, this is the cause. And let's say, you know, whatever, the black... whatever thing then in the 70s they told you oh this is the cause and people as human beings like yeah of course we don't want anyone to be oppressed we don't want anyone to be you know pushed out of societies whether gay or whatever it is and then cause after cause that they sold us initially on paper it makes sense and we don't want that but this is the way they were able to destroy all the units

Speaker 26that Dr. Roshanak was talking about, you know, the religion, then the community, then the family, then within the family, the individuals, then it came to man and woman and all that through selling us causes, right? It is... No, the gay people, oh my God, we shouldn't be, we should be fair, we should accept them. And we were like, yeah, of course, let's do that. Then it became transgender. Then it became, they have the right to go on the streets. And then they shame you if you don't agree with it. They say you're a bad person. You don't want an eight-year-old to get their dick chopped off. You're a bad person. They weaponize white altruism as well. 100%. This is how we find ourselves today with what we're dealing with.

Speaker 26But if you look back, you will see how they did it generation after generation, generation after generation. And they were able to teach us something that I fell for as well, that tradition is like something bad. Your parents are traditional, like it's something bad. And let me tell you what I found out. Tradition becomes tradition because we are...

Speaker 26creatures of trial and error. And through centuries and centuries and centuries, we've done trial and error. And what became tradition is what worked best for the individual and the society. And here comes these Talmudic tribe telling you, damn with tradition. It's old school. You're bad. Throw tradition. We revolted against tradition. We revolted against the traditions of our parents even.

Speaker 26And this is also another way they were able to get us where we are today. We're disconnected from everything. We're an individual. And even as an individual, we don't have any anchor in our brain to anchor us to anything related to reality. But none of it was organic, guys. None of it. And I'll finish with that. That is why when I came into these spaces being...

Speaker 26completely averse to social media, even Facebook, because I understood the whole game. And finding people awake and people, and I'm like, this is a miracle. Somehow these people, they did perfectly in social engineering, but they fucked, excuse my language, they fucked up somewhere because people have slipped out of the programming and they're coming back to reality.

Speaker 26and what God is and what the creation is and where we exist and what's the purpose of being here and how we need to work together. So it is dark, but at the same time, it's just beautiful how it got darkest before the dawn. And I believe we are in the dawn, ladies and gentlemen. And I love you all. Thanks. Red, that was so beautifully stated. And I'd be curious for your thoughts because...

Ian MalcolmI believe that the awareness to the subversion is both a result of the ever decreasing economic opportunity for the masses who therefore feel just further and further disconnected from any reasonable amount of prospective opportunity that they can have, coupled with the absurdity of the cultural aspects, right? People were willing to kind of roll over.

Speaker 26for this or that or this or that. But now to Wolf's comment, California is saying your kids have to be instructed on what it is to be transgendered via a classroom. It feels like we've reached both an economic and a cultural rejection of those two things. Yeah, 100%. I think a major part is this disenfranchisement from people. Young people are like, you know what? I can't even launch. I can't even start.

Speaker 26And they just looked back and said, like, there's something completely wrong with it, with the whole thing. And the economic aspect is 100% a very great one. And I think because, like you said something, Ian, about the hamster wheel, right? They were in the 50s, 60s, 70s onwards, and even early... I would say early 2000s, they were able to get you to be 18 and then go jump on the hamster wheel and then Bob's your uncle. You don't know anything about life. What's going on? You're just on the hamster wheel and they can lead you the way they want. Young generations today, they couldn't even jump on that hamster wheel. It is like, I don't have a chance to do that. The economy is so terrible. There's no way I can buy a house. I can hardly get married. I can't even find a decent...

Speaker 26a woman that's not crazy. Right. And all that. So, yeah, yeah. A hundred percent. Uh, something happened, something happened where, uh, you know, people are slipping out of the program again, which is, which is, yeah, again, really good. Thanks. No, absolutely. And I do feel like we are at the dawn. Uh, I sincerely do. And it's curious because the dawn of people awakening to this subversion is being met with, uh, essentially the conclusion of the, uh,

Ian Malcolmtotalitarian empire right the technocracy is making its final uh run and it it feels like we are living through some kind of hollywood movie in that regard in slow motion right where every day we turn around and there's another agreement with palantir another set of drones another uh prospective genocide of the palestinians larry old line tick tock oh yeah there you go and and

Ian MalcolmIt's actually, it brings me to a question that maybe I'll throw down. I know we've got some additional hands up here. And so I'll throw this one to Nina, who has her hand up. And the question, Nina, is around this idea of the technocracy, this kind of final era, and with it, the destruction of the common sense that would be our natural liberties that are being stripped as that's being built up. So I'm kind of curious for your thoughts on that battle between

Speaker 27people awakening to their enslavement versus the technocrats basically putting the final shackles on the masses. And I'd be curious for your thoughts and then everything else that we're talking about. Hey, thank you. Thank you, Egan. First of all, I want to congratulate Joanna, Keith, and you for an absolutely spectacular space. And how can you go wrong with guests like Dr. Roshanak, Raeed, and Heidi, and so many of you whose faces are familiar.

Speaker 27I was triggered by things that Dr. Roshanak said that... Sorry, sister. No, in a positive way, because it reminded me, and I hope I answered Ian's question or Ian's proposal suggestion regarding what to address. It reminded me, and I apologize, I don't... I don't like to share anything personal. I don't even like to speak generally, but I think this is pretty important because I happen to work with high schoolers and a part-time teacher. I see a lot of evolution or maybe devolution of what is going on with high schools. But I wanted to talk about something very personal, which are my twins and my mother coming to visit from abroad.

Speaker 27jolting me awake when I said, well, the doctor mom says to do things like this or to do things like that. Or one of her questions that got me thinking was, well, I live in Arizona. It's hot here. It was September. And she said, well, don't you ever give these babies any water? Evian water, specifically French. very chauvinistic there. And I said, well, the doctor didn't say. And she said, well, you live in a hot climate. You need to give them a little bit of water, get their intestines working and all sorts of things like that. And she said, listen, I raised seven of you. I think your doctors have had their nose in their books so long that they've forgotten the practicality of raising children. Powerful to me.

Speaker 27um books versus experience right books versus a mom um so it immediately um it immediately uh not forced me that's a strong word but made me look at the whole business of um they were babies everything that my doctor was saying to me i filtered through my mom from that point on um And something else I wanted to say, and also during this upbringing, doctors tell you here in the United States, do not pick them up when they're crying to fall asleep. You have to let them fall asleep crying. Babies are often screaming trying to fall asleep. And I am raised between two cultures, three if we count my American culture after all.

Speaker 27came here, learned English when I was 12 and 13 before I went back and returned. My grandmama is American. And so I was raised between French culture, which is extremely progressive and permissive, and a Moroccan culture, which is very traditional. And there was this incredible tug of war between us and our parents. living in France, growing up in France, and coming on holidays to Morocco, going on the beach, having to behave in a manner that was appropriate to the culture. So it was very interesting to see these different upbringings, the Western birth, the Eastern Mediterranean.

Speaker 27We might say Western Mediterranean, but I say Eastern in the sense of Oriental. And so what have I come up with raising my children? I believe that the most beneficial... Oh, this was very important that I wanted to say. In America, they encourage you to let children cry themselves to sleep. In African cultures that I've read about, including Morocco, although it's North African, but it's similar there, the mothers carry the babies on their back. They do chores on their back all day long. The babies fall asleep quietly. The babies are...

Speaker 27constant close contact with their mamas, with their moms. And they sleep together as a family. In African cultures, I'm sure you've read about that, families sleep huddled together in tents or whatever, or huts. But there's this incredible physical, tactile closeness that is very... disparaged here in the United States and looked down upon. And so there's this pressure to separate the babies from their mom at a very, very young age, which I find is perhaps not as healthy as, quote unquote, the medical establishment would say it is. And I'd love to hear Dr. Roshanak about that. But no, I think intimacy, closeness,

Speaker 27the touching, the feeling, the movement of the mother doing chores and so on. It's beautiful and it's healthy. And anyway, that was my little spiel on the... upbringing of children or the way families are turning out to be. And I think there is nothing wrong. And in fact, everything right about tradition. So thank you so much for letting me ramble on like this. But I just want to share these thoughts. Thank you. Thanks again, Keith, Joanna, everyone. I'm going to step back and listen to your comments. Thank you.

@malleusigHi, thank you so much for coming up, Nina. I loved everything you said. Rabbi, go for it. Hey, how are you guys doing? I just wanted to, in my head, I'm keeping notes. There were like two topics that I want to touch on. One was what Nina was just saying, and I agree with her completely. One of the things that happens, I think, when you let your kids, you make your kids cry themselves to sleep, is you're creating a child...

@malleusigwho is unsure of whether or not its parents are going to be there when it needs it. This creates uncertainty. It creates anxiety in the child. If the child cries in the middle of the night and no one comes, the child has to face this kind of like existential dread that comes over you in the dark. It's like, wait, are my parents ever going to come back? And if the parent is attentive and comes in,

@malleusigBasically, what you're teaching the child is you tell them the child, okay, no, no, you live in a safe universe and your parents will be here. Someone will be there to help you when you need it, when you are alone and desperate. And this is one of the things that gives the child confidence, a secure attachment style, et cetera, et cetera. And I think whoever came up with this idea that you need to let them cry themselves to sleep was either a psychopath or was deliberately trying to screw up an entire generation of children.

@malleusigIt is not a good idea at all. You just go in, pick them up, hold them. It doesn't matter if it's 3 a.m., right? And what you're doing is you're creating a child that has a more secure center. They have a more secure connection to themselves and to the people around them. And you're basically helping your kid live a psychologically healthy life the rest of, you know, even as far as adulthood.

@malleusigSo I cannot recommend highly enough. When your kid cries, go and pick them up. Or, like Nina said, sleep with your kid. I think Americans, we're not averse to sleeping with our kids because we don't like touching them. Basically, Americans especially, we are very, very puritanical when it comes to sex. And so anything that even has a hint of possibly being sex-related, we're like, no, no, no, no, no.

@malleusigPut the kid in the room over there, right? But I can tell you, like, in places like Korea and Japan, like, they have a traditional way of sleeping where it's mom on one side, dad on the other side, and the kids in the middle. This is how they all sleep, right? And it's got nothing to do with sex. It's, like, completely, like, I think Americans were too, we think about it way too often.

@malleusigThe mothers and the fathers, they find time for each other in other ways, like other places, other times, because we're at school, etc., etc. But this creates kids that are very, very secure. They have a very secure base because they know the world outside of, for example, the outside of the bed is guarded on one side by dad, on the other side by mom, and this lets them sleep very, very securely. And they grow up

@malleusigVery, very secure as a result of that. I mean, there are other issues as well, obviously. The lack of emotion shown in Japanese households. But that is one very good thing. So I cannot regulate highly enough. The other thing is, you were discussing the taking away of religion. One of the side effects of that, which I keep coming back to, is that if you go in and you remove the power of Christianity, you remove the power of traditional religion,

@malleusigby subverting it, by making it look evil or discombobulated or, you know, when things come up like the scandals with child abuse in the Vatican. First of all, you introduce the child abuse. Then you make a big deal out of it to discredit the church. What happens? People begin to say, well, religion no longer has any power. Now I'm going to believe only in the secular materialistic world.

@malleusigAnd that becomes my new faith. Atheism becomes my new faith. But what happens when someone comes along and says, hey, I've got this really cool club that I belong to. We meet every month or so. And we have orgies and really good food. And there's music. And we meet on the ground in these really cool bunkers. And it's like, you know, the only thing is we worship Satan. But it's actually kind of cool because Satan worship actually...

@malleusigis really fun and really rewarding psychologically. So you should come do that. It also makes you part of the in-club. You're like the cool kids now. You're the elites. And so it's way cooler than Christianity. So you should totally consider it, right? And basically it's, you know, Satanists infiltrate Christianity. They make Christianity look awful. And then it's all a big recruiting drive to get people to just automatically jump to Satanism when it's offered.

Ian Malcolmwhich is another part that we could talk for hours and hours and hours. And Rabbi, if you wouldn't mind incorporating into that, because it's rather curious, but essentially the three-step plan in the Albert Pike letters around this very subject was essentially World War I to take out the Russian Christian Empire, World War II to weaponize that against the Christian European continent, and then World War III was essentially taking the ashes of that empire, weaponizing it against Islam,

Ian MalcolmAnd then from the ashes, I mean, Pike didn't say that the Jews would necessarily take the place of it, but he just said that in the disaster, the rubble, and the demoralization of all the people that would watch all the suffering, that Satanism would rise. And so you're almost seeing that in, you know, the foundation for that being laid today. It's all playing out. People are actually pushing back into religion, aren't they? Well, Satanism is just a control layer around Judaism.

@malleusigsatanism is essentially judaism light for the goy for the like quote-unquote like enlightened um so kind of like the enlightened like proximal goy right and then satanism is used to control the you know what they see as the barbarians like the savages outside of the gates of even satanism i'm sorry doc you were saying something no i'm sorry i apologize um i was just thinking that from what ian was saying

Speaker 17one possible track or maybe the expectation is that people become so demoralized and they'd be totally atheistic and easily manipulated. But what we're seeing now is actually there is a rise in a push against modernity and back to religion. And then that's also being hijacked for political reasons.

Speaker 9Yeah, I think Catholicism is doubling 20% and whatnot. And to Rabbi's point, look at the movies. They glorify the devil, make the devil sexy, and all this stuff. And you get stuff like people never make movies about Jesus or anything. Or you get the quarterback for the Texans two years ago in a playoff game said, I want to thank Jesus Christ and my family and stuff. And NBC cut it out after.

Speaker 17the post in post game and just went to, I want to thank my family in that because they don't want anyone obviously talking about Jesus. Even that far. Really? What about the, what about the show? The chosen that's become like a huge worldwide success. It's literally being, uh, supported financially by the average person. I don't know that one. I can't attest to it. I don't know. Yeah, there's a, I do. I've seen it. Yeah.

Speaker 28And it's the story of Christ and the disciples. Yeah, it's Christ and the disciples. It's semi... I don't want to say it's 100% historically accurate because it's more like a soap opera of the disciples and Jesus. I wouldn't call it a soap opera, but... It's like conflating Jesus with Jews because it's calling Jesus and the disciples the chosen. Sorry, what was that?

Speaker 17Is it like conflating Jesus and the disciples with the chosen by calling them the chosen? It's not that they're the chosen Jews, but it's the story of how, and it's funny because it's run by people in Utah now who are not Christians, but yeah, it's a whole thing. Look it up. And it's Angel Studios that did do it. And then there was this whole, there was a takeover, but it's called the chosen. It started off as a little thing.

Speaker 17And now it's, I think, in its sixth season. And Apple has picked it up as they're the ones who are going to show it. Because you can get it free on the app, but then you have to wait like six months or something like that. But Apple will show it. And it actually starts in the movie. Now their model is to go to the movies so people actually pay and go see it in the movies. And they'll have like three episodes. It'll be like one movie. And then the next three episodes will be the second movie, et cetera. And then Apple has picked it up.

Speaker 17You get to watch it there week after week until months later, then it comes into the app, which is the only other place you can see it. It is now literally crowdfunded. It's become a huge international sensation. It's called The Chosen. That's interesting. Anytime I see anything like that...

@malleusigIt looks interesting, but... I would say, Rabbi, I would agree with you that it does kind of try to spin that context that since all the disciples are Jewish, they are, quote-unquote, as the show is named, the chosen. Yeah, I'm very skeptical of anything that kind of goes on, because you're seeing a huge push with Jews, especially in this app and in media, to identify Jesus as Jewish and then claim alignment.

@malleusigeven so far as that asshole yesterday, who was like, well, no, no, so, you know, we killed, you know, so we killed Jesus. So, actually, we're the ones that helped make Christianity what it is today by killing your Savior. And, like, the best part of that whole interview was, like, he was like, you know, we didn't expect you to thank us or anything, but, and I was like, you absolute, like, I don't even have a word for you right now. Holy shit, damn. Well, yeah, and this Jewish guy was like, listen,

@malleusigIt's like, yeah, I mean, we killed Jesus, and so, you know, would Jesus have fulfilled this mission if Jesus hadn't killed him? And it's like, we don't expect you to thank us, but, and then when I was like, I wanted to punch the guy in the face. I was like, I can't believe you just fucking said that. Dude, messed up logic is everywhere. Was his name Adam Green? Well, and for what it's worth, Rabbi, on Angel Studios, I know they did a movie entitled, I think it was Homestead. They've got that actor who...

Ian MalcolmHe wasn't in The Rock, but if you look him up, you're going to think... He was in one of the shows... What is it? A cowboy show that's taking place right now. A very popular show. Yellowstone. He was in Yellowstone. He's also the lead actor, and I think he's in most of the Angel Studios productions. If you look up his face, you're going to recognize him. No, they did a child trafficking movie two years ago. Yeah, exactly. And they do... It seems like it's pretty...

Ian MalcolmIt's pretty innocuous, and it's wild because, by contrast, compared to everything else in the media, it's a massive improvement, of course. But I was just going to mention that in the Homestead movie, there is kind of a subversive element that's essentially like, you should open your gates to everybody, even in a disaster scenario, which kind of feels like a little subtle nod at, you know, open the borders or any of these kind of things. And so I'm not...

Ian Malcolmaccusing them of that necessarily but I would say that the film and I think Dr. Rushnak was talking about this what's neat is their what would you call it their approach is that not only do they sell tickets but because most of their movies are probably going to be less viewed they have a whole program that at the end of the ticket they have a scan the QR thing and you can you know donate so somebody else can see the film free of cost and so it seems it seems to be you know or have its head in the right place

Ian MalcolmI find it difficult to believe that just because we know how controlled the media is. But it's certainly a much better offering than Beavis and Butthead or whatever the latest incarnation of that might be on the television. Yeah, I think his name is James Caviezel or something. but yeah, I've seen... Is it Neil McDonough? He was in Sound of Freedom, but he's not the one I'm thinking of. Is it Neil McDonough you're thinking of, possibly? That's exactly who it is. Yeah, he looks like a cowboy. Yeah, because you reminded me that he's in that movie with The Rock about gambling at a casino. I forget what it's called. Oh, Walking Tall. Ah, yes. The one that I'm thinking of, and Rabbi, here's some movie trivia for you. There's a famous actor. He plays the villain slash...

Ian MalcolmI don't want to say hero, but he's villain slash maybe anti-villain in The Rock. One of the most famed actors of the last 30 years. Everybody recognizes his face. Nobody remembers his name. I'm curious if you can get it. Oh, I think I know. I don't even know the face. I haven't seen The Rock. What? You haven't seen The Rock, Sean Connery? No, no, no. That's what I'm talking about. The Sean Connery, The Rock. Oh, man. I don't remember that.

Ian MalcolmKeith, can you get this one for me? Come on. Somebody's got a bad cleanup. He plays the villain. Oh, fuck. Ed Harris? Help me, help me. There it is. He's one of those actors that 99 out of 100 people know his face. I know Ed Harris. He's great in that movie with Casey Affleck. Ed Harris is a major actor. Is that who we're talking about?

Ian MalcolmYep. That's what I'm saying. Everybody knows his face, but a very small subset remember his name for some reason. He's got the loose eyes. They're very piercing. He's a very good actor. Nichols Cajun is fine. Oh, yeah. I googled him. But but and Rabbi, this is maybe one for you to just some ingredients for you to enjoy. Right. If you think of a movie like The Rock, which was rated R back in the day, it was Michael Bay, one of his big blockbusters. It was pushed by every element of Hollywood. And it had, you know, it had the let's say some adult content between blood and violence. And there's a scene that's, let's say, a compilation in the beginning of the movie with Nicolas Cage's character. Right. That's obviously not for kids.

Ian MalcolmBut in terms of subversive elements of the film, it pushed masculinity, it celebrated Sean Connery as being kind of a hero who had been wrongfully imprisoned. It's crazy to compare and contrast what 20 years has done to the mainstream media and what they're putting out. They had to go slowly. You have to insert the thin end of the wedge first before you can shove the whole thing in. And at that time, what you have to do is you have to give the audience...

@malleusiglike themes that are actually gratifying and fulfilling, you can't just make the whole movie about a transgender, you know, cripple that is trying to fight against the, you know, the evils of dyslexia and expects people to come and see the movie, right? You have to give them some reason to see the movie. And it isn't until you get to like the 2010s and you have, you know, a nation of psychopaths because we literally raved for, I don't know how we did it.

@malleusigwe literally raised like maybe the people that went to see those movies, right? They raised their children in such a way that they became narcissistic sociopaths. And now we have a whole generation of kids like the woke crowd that don't understand what it is to be a good person. They think it's like, they think it's like, you know, when Cartman, when Cartman has to become a better person so that Kyle will give him something. And he like, he just like shows up at Kyle's door and he's wearing a new sweater. And he's like,

@malleusigHe's like, look, I'm a new person. I'm a nice person now. And Kyle was like, no, no, no, you're not a nice person. You're just wearing a nice sweater. And he looks down and he's like, I don't understand the difference. And it's like, that's exactly what Wolkies are. It's like they just think that if you perform like a good person, that makes you a good person. Like you say what the good person things are, that makes you a good person. It's got nothing to do with internalized morality. And so...

@malleusigthose people right now are the ones that will go to see the story about the transgender dyslexic because going to see that movie makes them look like good people, right? And they don't know the difference between performing as a good person and going to see the movie or being a good person and actually helping somebody. It's like supporting BLM knowing who George Floyd was. And speaking of movies now, I don't know if you know about it, Rabbi, or Ian, me and Goyim talk about it a lot and it's coming out in three or four days, this new movie, Mercy, that's...

Speaker 9all about it with chris pratt he has 90 minutes to solve uh a murder that he's accused of and it's an ai judge that's ruling over him and he has has to get above like a 92 percent or whatnot aka some serious subconscious uh planting for the future to be honest when it's probably going to be an ai judge determining a lot of our fates at the end of the day

Speaker 9And it just, I think it was Ian or you, one of you hit on R-rated movies. Nowadays, like PG-13 was R back in the day. But they made this one PG-13. I think it's funny. It's an IMAX. It's pushed everywhere because they want, and I'm sure it'll be a good movie, but it is 100% Agenda 2030, getting you ready for AI technocracy. And we've talked about in, I think in Albania, they have a fucking AI president now or whatever it is, prime minister.

Ian MalcolmBut this Mercy movie, people will probably see it on YouTube, the commercials. It is creepy as hell, man. They absolutely should have named that the Minority Report Part 2. True. No. Oh, the pre-crime thing. Holy shit, you're right. By the way, Rabbi, I just thought, because we're talking to those movies, we're going to have to do a space one time, and it'll be an open forum for people to suggest the best...

Ian Malcolmunderrated film of all time, so you can't go to one of the obvious answers. Idiocracy. Documentary. Oh my god, I was going to say that, boy. I was thinking that in my mind and you took it right out of my mouth. I haven't watched it. I'm telling you. We're going to have to do that one in addition to... Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter that we're going to have to break down, Rabbi. And the Star Wars one we did was supposed to cover all three, but we had too much fun in the galaxy. There was no time. We did five hours on Star Wars, Ian. We did five hours on Star Wars alone. Just four, five, and six, or one, two, and three as well? No, no, no. Just on the George Lucas empire, which is, it was perfect because we ended with a speech from Lucas on the difference between pleasure and joy.

Ian MalcolmAnd it was perfectly symbolic of the original six films versus the Disney Empire, which is, I suppose, pleasurable to some that have no moral compass. Also, you know, speaking of Star Wars, today is Kathleen Kennedy's last day as head of Lucasfilm. So, hey. Woohoo! Nice.

@malleusigNo, but, like, listen, we have to do Star Trek, too, because I was talking with my friend today, and she wrote up Star Trek. I was like, oh, that's right. We have to do Star Trek because, like, the Vulcans are Jews. The Romulans are space Arabs, right? The, you know, what is it? Like, the humans are basically just Americans. Like, all the parallels in that series and the movies, especially with the reboot. If you guys do Star Trek without me, we're going to have a problem. Oh, come. Do Star Trek. Seriously. No, seriously. I've been a Trekkie since, like, birth.

Speaker 17And I've seen, I can like literally verbatim tell you what's going on in each of the, like my brother and I will sit there and say the words while the show is on. I'm just saying. Okay. So, so I'm, I'm heavy on the reboot, but it sounds like you're going to, you're going to pick up the slack and like carry us through the series, right? The TV, the original TV series, the original TV series, the ones that they got wrong with, uh, what was it with Kathleen? Whatever was the captain Voyager.

Speaker 17No, not Voyager. Yeah, Voyager. Captain Janeway. All that Euro stuff was crap and it was wrong. I was going crazy back then. I was at EL. I'm like, I'm going to write to these people and tell them you've got to change this. And then the newer stuff with the... You guys need someone who knows what you're talking about. You should have sent them in an application. Sorry, sorry. No, I'm sorry. Donnie, we can't hear you. I'm censored. I missed your...

@malleusigI miss Uncensored. Donna, Donna, your connection's shit. You're rubber banding, Donna. You need to fix your mic. Let me recycle you real quick. I've been struggling to stay up. Let me send you a mic real quick. I want to know what your ice update is, Donna. No, but this is, Dr. Rushnag, this is actually kind of exciting because I would love to do a Star Trek space with a real Trekkie. That'd be fantastic.

Speaker 17Like you, me, Ian. Well, my favorite one is where Kirk is with the Gorn and they're like talking about how we're this horrible civilization and we're murderous and we should die. And he's like, yes, we could kill. But, you know, we choose not to. All that stuff. Right. So it's all about we've got all this crap in us. Yes. But how are we choosing to express it? What are we going to do with it? The question is, who are the Ferengi? Oh, man, the Ferengi. Lord above. But they make sense. But all right. All right. All right.

Speaker 17I think the Ferengi... I know where you're going with this. I got it. The Eastern European Jews. The Vulcans are the American Jews. What's an underrated movie for you, Rabbi? Off the top of your head. An underrated movie for me? Collided with a Chance of Meatballs. Oh, there you go.

Speaker 9I missed that. Uncentered DM, he said, don't tell too many people, but Chandler's List is one of the most underrated movies out there. Rabbi, that actually was a great cartoon. That wasn't Pixar, but that was a very funny one. What am I getting accused of? I told people, you DM me, don't tell everybody, but I really like...

Speaker 28favorite underrated movies is Schindler's List. It's a great... Uncensored has a framed copy of the Schindler's List original script hanging on its wall. I'm not going to lie. The first time I saw Schindler's List, I... You know, where the bad guys win, right? I mean, so, you know, in Schindler's List, you know, the bad guy saves all those people. The first time I saw Schindler's List, I thought it was the origin story of Magneto. What?

Ian MalcolmTalk about Jews. That is, in fact, the backstory on Magneto. It basically is. Yeah, it works. That's pretty hilarious. In the original trilogy films, and actually, Rabbi, here's a strange pivot. Yeah. But you know what's a wild exercise is to look at Blade, played by Wesley Snipes in the, I think it was 90s, and then look at the original X-Men trilogy, and the best case and point on what I'm about to say is Hugh Jackman, who...

Ian Malcolmplayed Wolverine. He was probably in his late 20s, early 30s when he played the character for the first time. He's supposed to be the buff Wolverine. And if you take a picture of him from that movie and compare him to literally like 2023 Hugh Jackman, he had put on like 50 pounds of muscle and steroids. And it just goes to show how completely out of whack society has become where, again, in the 90s, Hugh Jackman in that film who looks like a strong, muscular...

Ian Malcolmregular I shouldn't say regular he looks like an abnormally strong guy but still within the confines of like normality and then it shows how ridiculous yeah and then you compare it to today and it just shows and you can do the same thing with women and beauty standards and all these things but society's completely gone upside down in 30 years it's ridiculous it's gone it's gone adolescent that's the problem it's gone we do we do we do

@malleusignow if you'll excuse me I'm going home to make love to my wife before we change the subject I just want to talk to Ian's point because he it was a good point like society has gone adolescent and animalistic like it's become way more focused on physicality and an exaggerated physicality especially look at the Kardashians and everything so what's happened is all of the all of the most pronounced and exaggerated examples of physical beauty have been hyped up and so

@malleusigbasically anything that looks normal gets ignored now. Everything that gets normal gets looked at as inferior or subpar. If you look at the sex symbols from the 60s, there was someone who was watching it, it was like Cary Grant or something, took his shirt off in a movie, and I was like, this guy looks like me. I do not have an impressive physique, but he looks like an accountant. He has an accountant's body, but he was a sex symbol back then. And it wasn't...

@malleusigbecause of his, you know, he didn't have a, he wasn't overweight, right? He didn't look, he wasn't like skinny, skinny, but like he was just normal. He was a normal dude, but he had a good voice and he knew how to talk. He knew how to carry himself. He dressed well. That's what made you attractive back then.

Speaker 29Now it's like if you're a woman, you have to get a butt lift, right? Or if you're a man, you have to have like pecs that are three size the state of Arkansas. No, it's even more now. Like $250,000. You have to smash your cheekbones and you have to take steroids before you even hit puberty. You must get bone extensions. Don't make fun of my guy. And it's like, hey, listen. And again, clavicular, you know. Look maxing, bro.

@malleusigYeah, I mean, listen, look maxing is what you have to do to get ahead now, dude. You got to... Homosexual. Think about the other end, though. Colin, Colin, think about the other end. Who's giving those operations? Most of those plastic surgery was almost entirely Jewish in the 80s and 90s, all right? What's happening is that drive to create, like, to massively increase the amount of physical competition among people for mate selection...

@malleusigis now turned into basically an advertisement for plastic surgery services, and the people that are benefiting are mostly Jewish plastic surgeons. It's like this whole kind of like second and third order effect, where it's like everything's being put in motion to benefit the same people. It's like La La Land, and all the movies like La La Land. How many movies come to mind? You don't have to answer. How many movies come to mind to you right now if I say, think of a movie about a young girl that goes to Hollywood, has a tough time, and then hits it big. There's like Swingers, right? Or Young Man. Swingers, La La Land. There's all these movies about this one thing. Made by Hollywood. Hollywood makes movies that are basically commercials.

@malleusigto advertise to young women and men, hey, if you're like among the most beautiful people in the country, you can come here and become a fucking movie star. And it's a commercial for Hollywood. And it's, what happens? All the best looking people from across the country, men and women, flood into this one place and they go and they have to screen themselves in front of essentially Jewish producers and agents. And then those Jewish people, they get picked.

Speaker 9they get pick of who they get to sleep with in return for a movie role, right? It's basically just a huge, you can look at Hollywood as basically just a multi-billion dollar initiative to get Jews laid. And now what do we get? Not H-1B, but O-1B, OnlyFans that have models can come into America if they have a lot of followers under the Trump administration. That's good. Well, not into Florida.

Speaker 29If we can get Fish back in there, he says you're going to get taxed to oblivion if you're an OnlyFans whore and you decide you want to set up shop in Miami. I don't want to burst your bubble on him, but I got some tweets. Yeah, I know. I know. It sucks. It is what it is. He's just like, anyone that's anti-Semitic, they're Jew, hatred, blah, blah, blah. I'm going to take incremental improvements until we can get there, you know, I guess. I don't know. It's better than... What do we have now? Florida...

@malleusigAnything is better. I'll take literally anything. An actual chimpanzee would be better in Florida. I would 100% take a chimpanzee. At least he can't pass any legislation. Well, maybe he can, but probably at a slower pace than your current leadership. Hey, man, if they can be crypto Jews, we can be crypto semi-critical, right? There's no reason we have to just give up and be like, no, we're not going to go there because they hate us. They hate us. Listen, we're the new Jews. Seriously. They hate us for no reason.

Speaker 9Does this mean we all have to get nose jobs too? No, that's the best part is we don't. No, unless you want to be Ashley Sinclair. We have to get our circumcisions reversed though. Robert, you're not even in America. Why do you care about it? I don't give a shit where I am. I'm still an American. They did something similar to where you were talking about too before with X where they had at first that girl Yvonne was banging Tiffany Fung or whatever the hell and Ian Miles the fucking pedo chong.

Speaker 9literally pedophile. I'll post the fucking receipts. Uh, like they're making like 20 K a month or whatever. And then like everybody thinks, Oh, I can go do this. I can be an influencer on X and I can make, you know, all this money and stuff. And then boom, you don't. And now you're wrapped up in all this stuff when you're a young kid that should be outside playing. And like, I was born in 91. I got the best of everything. I got to play outside and do whatever it like, dude, kids nowadays, God bless them. If they don't have strict parents, you're in a fucking tablet or something, 12 hours a day, you are cooked. Nevermind watching,

Speaker 9Netflix and all this shit. I mean, I loved Stranger Things. It was a great season. My mom loved it. But it is just literally the opening scene. Eleven comes out of training and time's out at 1233. There's your 333 and then all the interracial, obviously, and many other things. I'm glad you're bashing it. I was about to say, dude. I was like, whoa, whoa, whoa, bro. Stranger things. Not a mind game, you know.

Speaker 9Go ahead, Keith. Sorry, I'm so against Stranger Things. The kids love it. The kids love it. There's nothing else. I think AI writes a lot of movies, but there's no good movies anymore. It's fucking crazy. We're talking about underrated movies. There's no fucking good movies at all anymore. They used to be pumping out bangers. Like I said, I like Jake Gyllenhaal. Prisoners, Nightcrawler, a lot of great movies that he's in. He's Jewish, too.

@malleusigPrisoners is a very great underrated psychological thriller that was a great call lesser known but very good but this is fantastic but they don't even know good movies the whole thing with no good movies is basically their strategy now is we're going to stop making good movies because people are going to say to themselves well I have to watch something and so you have no choice but to watch their propaganda

Speaker 30Hollywood has definitely adhered to the woke agenda as well. I used to work in television, film, and I took a break for the past 20 years. I'd barely been watching it. During the holiday, I remember we watched this movie called Bird Box. It's interesting to see their choice. Is that the Sandra Bullock one? Yeah. You can't look outside. Oy vey!

Speaker 30It's just interesting. Like now the bad guys are always depicted as the straight white guy. Right. And it's just like anything that that person, anyone that fits that demographic, you're, you're kind of shady now. And it's like, I made a nice little hit piece on that sign. I got a lot of fuse, man. I narrowed down like what they're now making movies. Like who's the villain. Who's the, who's like the, you know, the, the people that look up to, I made, I forgot where it is about Netflix. And it's like on the end,

@based__francisThe dad is always like the bad guy or the white guy is the bad guy. The dad has been vilified. The mother is the hero. The gay guy is something. It's like all these things. It's just unbelievable. Anyways, continue, bro. It's just crazy. I cannot watch anything anymore. It has to be early 2000s or 90s and 80s. That's not even a new thing, though. It was like that before, too. In the 80s, the bad guy was always the tall blonde guy, right?

Ian MalcolmSo the huge, tall, Germanic-looking guy was always the asshole. Yeah, that's debatable. Not everywhere. You mean Hans Gruber? Hans Gruber? Yeah. He's not out of the norm? Most of the Bond villains, too, right? The big Russian guy, the big, tall Russian dude in the movies with Rocky. I was going to say, you talk about the Rocky movies? Yeah.

@malleusiganother very innovative movie. And Rabbi, that was basically the thing. It was either a German or a Russian villain for what felt like 20 or 30 years, and now it's just generic white... That is true. That is true. No, but even in the 80s, the stories where we have... Better Off Dead comes to mind, but it's not even that. It's like any movie where you have a high school kid and he's being bullied by the school bully, and he has to show him up by racing him or...

@malleusigfighting him or does a dance off or some shit like the the bully is always like this tall good-looking blonde kid usually with with with brown eyebrows right so it's like like in the karate kid exactly right

Speaker 9So it's always a tall, blonde kid, a tall, blonde, muscular kid. And it's like, what's that telling you? It's telling you that strong, good-looking people that look like they have Germanic ancestry are the real villains. And, like, who would want you to believe that? Don't aspire to be that. Yeah. Now they embrace fat and all this shit on, obviously, all these commercials and everything. It's good to be plus size. Like, no, it's not. It's literally terrible. You're going to die earlier. Like, what the fuck? They've just inverted everything. Sweep the legs is still good advice, though.

Speaker 9And then they get ruined. Hey, if you don't get, quote-unquote, vaccinated, you're going to kill your grandmother, or you're a bad person, and you can't fit inside, you can't go to the ballgame. And like I say all the time, all my friends are anti-Big Pharmaffia their whole life. One of them had a wedding, one of them had a honeymoon, and they, quote-unquote, caught COVID, which is a scam anyways with the PCR test. And then they still got fucking vaccinated. And one of them got tinnitus. I'm like, there you go. Fantastic, brother man. And they still call me the conspiracy theorist. And Rabbi...

Ian MalcolmRabbi, I'll throw one at you again, and I'm sorry to keep bouncing off you, but I love your pop culture meets psychology, because the curious thing is you'll hear people suggest that at that point in the time, let's say the 90s, early 2000s, that things were not diverse at all, right? And then you look at a film, and one of the ones that came to mind for some random reason was Rush Hour, which I don't know if you remember.

Ian Malcolmbut with Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, which was one of the, like a lesser known, but rather solid comedy. And if you look at the values that's even in that, it's about family, protecting kids, being strong and, you know, not just strong and I suppose funny, but also strong in like a traditional sense and masculine perhaps. Yeah, yeah. So this is going into anyone, anyone in the audience who's listening, who's younger than 30, right?

@malleusigSo just keep this in mind. Whenever anyone tells you that in the past, like, movies were less diverse or they were sexist or they were racist, they're lying to you, okay? Movies were never like that, all right? You can go back. Go back to Gone with the Wind, one of, like, the first big hits. This was 1938, I think it was. This was before World War II. Gone with the Wind was about a fucking girl boss, all right?

@malleusigIt was about a woman who took control of her own destiny and created her own business and became like a fucking millionaire or some shit, all right? Yeah, she was an asshole, but that's like the point was back then that was okay, all right? It's like they literally, they're kind in the depiction of ex-slaves for fucking sake. Like it is, it is not. Like I've gone back and watched the old movies. Everyone telling you that previous movies were sexist or racist.

@malleusiglying it is a complete lie we have always had one of the most progressive if not the most progressive film industry when it comes to this kind of thing what they have done is if you go back and you look at movies right you look at movies in like I'd say like from the 70s to the 80s and 90s right you see a pattern and this is a pattern that I believe

@malleusighad to have been coordinated by jewish movie executives because it's too conspicuous not to be but you have diversity in movies but you don't have race mixing you don't have uh if you have like there's a you know the teenage horror movie right The black kid at high school is always dating the only other black girl at high school. Like the black guy and the black girl are dating. The white guy and the white girl are dating. The Asian guy and the Asian girl are dating, right? You did not see race mixing. That is the one thing you didn't see. Do you remember the movie Guess Who's Coming to Dinner? Yes, that's what I'm getting to. The only exception was when the movie was specifically about race mixing, right? If you go back, it is difficult to find a movie that casually

@malleusigthrew in race mixing and didn't talk about it. Star Trek, interracial mix, the first kiss. I know, but that was hyped up so much. I'm sorry, I just had to say it. And did it last? It didn't last, right? They fucked and that was over, right? So it's like, even with that, it wasn't really a big thing. Star Trek, all they did was kiss. That's all they did. Well, yeah, that's what they showed. You know Kirk hit that.

@malleusigBut the everything, every alien didn't matter what it was. My point exactly. So but my point is this. There was some kind of unwritten or unspoken or unrevealed rule back then, even when the viewing audience was totally fine with it. I remember being in the 90s and be like, why don't they show this? This is conspicuous in its absence. And it's like, for some reason, they just avoided it entirely. And I think the reason they did it was.

@malleusigso that they could blame us, the viewing audience, for being racist for the movies they made, and then use it as a way to sell this whole woke shit to us after the 2010s. That's so- Oh yeah, bro, y'all are cooking, man. I'm itching to get into Cabo, bro.

Speaker 9It's so Jewish. It's like True Teller says all the time. They fucking blame you for catching them in their crimes when they genocide people and then you call it out. They blame you for it. And then movies like There Will Be Blood, all these great movies about triumph and all this stuff and men being men and finding oil and fantastic movies never will be made again. Never for the most part. It's all fucking...

Ian Malcolmjust soft ass and talk about, I mean, the, the race mixing is like, it's, you probably won't get a movie now unless you race mix. And again, we take Hollywood over and make the good movies again. Stop it. All right. I agree. No, but that's the thing. No, I do have, I do. And I'm gonna throw this question at, at Dre who's down there. Um, and first and foremost, I do think that AI, despite all of its terribleness, uh, and, and technocracy, uh,

Ian MalcolmOne thing that is exciting about it is it will prospectively give creative people of all ages the opportunity to perhaps construct films and culture and build things that the audiences will be interested in. When I say the audiences, they could put it for free, right, out on something like X and say, here's my latest movie. And to me, that's extremely encouraging and exciting. And some of the stuff that I've seen people doing and putting on YouTube with AI, some of it is...

Ian MalcolmI mean, it competes with even the big blockbuster studios. And I don't know how they're frankly doing it because I don't understand the technology. But it is because if you think about it, the storytelling of old, that's how that's how legacies, that's how history, that's how culture was traditionally passed down. Right. You didn't have Hollywood saying, here's the world as we present it. Right. It was it was an oral set of traditions. And so the ability to put the power of Hollywood into the hands of the creator is.

Ian Malcolmunbelievably exciting i think they'll be able to have less control over it so perhaps we'll see some real genuine innovation creativity and perhaps you know positive uh what would you call them like viral uh sensations that might come out of that but uh dre to throw one over to you i think of the last 25 years perhaps one of the uh most righteously masculine characters would have to be uh maximus uh decimus aurelius i think was the uh with the name from gladiator

Ian MalcolmI'm curious for your thoughts, Dre, on the most righteous masculine character of the last 25 years and your thoughts on the topic. Tom Cruise, freaking James Bond. That would be the first thing that comes to mind, I would say. Definitely Tom Cruise and Ethan Hunt in The Mission Impossible. Can y'all hear me, by the way? I was just golfing an elevator. Yep. Yes, yeah, we can. I was going to correct you there. Never 007 for Mr. Cruise, though I'd be interested in seeing him portray it.

Speaker 31um but he did do a great job as ethan yeah forever gonna be a badass but um man what you know the traditional movies man i feel like was the ideal like of how things should have been in society you know like like um for example like remember the american pie series american pie like yeah it was like i love american pie you know i mean like i started students print but you know like i mean how sweet it is to be loved by you by you

Speaker 31You just got to be careful how you refer to loving that movie just because I think in the movie they literally F American Pie, if I'm not mistaken. So, you know, the musicals and stuff. And then, you know, I'm thinking like, yeah, bro, like there was times where like these traditional good movies were like, you know, it kept...

Speaker 31kept things an ideal size. What is he talking about? Dre, you and I need to have a conversation about this. American Pie is not a traditional movie. It's literally a degenerate sex comedy. I know, but I was just first time came to my mind. But I'm just talking about like, you know, like without all the freaking... the race mix scene and the DEI and all this stuff, it kind of ruined traditional movie. No, but like, so, so I, I went to, I went to Maximus and gladiator. I was going to say, I went to, I went to.

Ian MalcolmI don't know, man. I went to Russell Crowe as a traditional hero and you went to Jason Bateman, a Jew in American Pie having sex with dessert. I don't know what to make of that. You did say Ethan Hunt. It wasn't Bateman. What's the guy's name? I forget. I took a flute and I put it... Yeah.

Speaker 31It's a story about a Jewish kid that has sex with big goods. Has the big, the Russian kids offer to sleep with him, which is like a sex fantasy. And then ends up with a Honda. Ian's question was good. Let me get in there. Officially, it's not traditional. I'm going to dig myself out. Let me bring it back. Let's talk about plate runner. You know what I'm saying? Let me dig myself out of this hole.

Speaker 31Bro, I don't know when it started. You got a long way to go, buddy. Around the 2010s, it just started to shift. These movies nowadays, it's like they're trying to normalize. like white guilt like to make people feel like bad for being white which is you know because like always who's the villain who's always oh he's he's trying to save it real quickly there he's like all right let me talk about the white girl but i'm out of this sorry let him let him cook that was the first that was glad let him go not ethan ian asked me a question like but i'd answer this question first and they're not doing their american pie thing i don't know why but do it to really get back to what i was saying like yeah like when like it's always the same kind of villain

Speaker 31You know, like, have you ever seen a black villain in a movie? You know, so like, like I'm really, I was really thinking about as I'm listening to, I'm like, yo, this is like, this is definitely some, some Jewish shy off Hollywood shit where they've used Hollywood as an instrument to kind of normalize, you know, like antagonizing the white man. Cause the white man is usually antagonist. It's just, it's just, it happens. Wait, wait, Dre, Dre, you bring up a really good question. I'm going to do a pop quiz. Cause I, I thought of one, uh,

Speaker 17But let's see, who am I going to pick on with this one? Dr. Rothschild, can you think of a single movie in the last 10 years with a black villain? It sort of depends, but I was thinking it's funny while you guys were talking about the movie that Denzel Washington did. I can't remember what it was called. Training Day. He's a bad guy. That's more than 10 years ago, but yeah, he is a bad guy. You mean American Gangster?

Speaker 17because he was kind of the semi-hero. No, American Gangster was... Actually, by the way, all those were really good movies. I'm going to think of what the name of it was, but he's got this wife, and then he's got this girlfriend, and, you know, the way he treats his kid. I can't remember the name of the movie, but yeah. But Training Day was... Training Day is fantastic.

Ian MalcolmAnd the reason that I bring it up is because the one that came to my mind is literally Black Panther. That's what I was going to say. He's not a bad guy. How is he a bad guy? No, no, no. The villain in the Black Panther played by Michael B. Jordan is also Black. But yes, exactly. But everybody's Black in Black Panther. That's why I mentioned it. Perhaps you could say the low-key TV show.

@malleusigThat's the only thing I can think of. How is there a black guy who's a bad guy? Isn't the Kang there? Yeah, he's the bad guy. Which is great because his name is literally Kang. Oh, you're talking about the woman? He can say, we was Kangs. Completely accurate. There's literally multiples of him, too. It's literally, it's like, we was Kangs, the TV show. I refuse, when Black Panther came out, I made it like a

Speaker 31like a strong declaration to refuse to watch it because all of a sudden there's now the sun and now black people from every corner of america care about you know oh they gave everybody went to movie theaters with dashiki's on i'm like oh y'all from africa now like yo fuck i thought y'all was everywhere else except from africa but now y'all from africa because of a black panther movie

Speaker 31You know, and I was, like, people gave me a lot of, like, they hated me because I was, like, really, really, like, out there with it. I was, like, awesome. I was, like, yo, y'all some fake black people. You want to scream black power now because of a freaking movie with all black characters and you're wearing dashikis and now all of a sudden y'all Africans. Do it in the memory of George Floyd. I've never watched Black Panther. Not once, bro. Because of, like, it just didn't make sense. Like, what about...

@malleusigWasn't there, you know, Black Panther? Wasn't there a Black Panther movement in the day? It just felt like Pandering 101. Dre, Dre, so Black Panther, Black Panther, give me the history. Black Panther was a comic book hero made by Marvel Comics in response to the Black Panther movement in the 60s, right? So it was basically, they were like, well...

@malleusigWe need to give something to panic to the black audience. And so they created a character called Black Panther because you had black people were moving up in terms of socioeconomic stability at that point. And so they made Black Panther by like in response to Black Panther. So it's no accident. It's literally inspired by it. But the the the thing about Black Panther is that you literally have a it's it's basically just James Bond, but with black people like when.

@malleusigWhen they make Marvel movies, you can see this pattern. Ant-Man, it's Ocean's Eleven, but with superheroes. Black Panther is James Bond, but with superheroes, right? You see this pattern where essentially each one of the characters will have their own genre of a movie. And Black Panther was that. It's basically Black Panther was the black James Bond. Wait, how is Ant-Man Ocean's Eleven? And then they had to make Ocean's Seven with the girls. Ant-Man was a heist movie.

@malleusigYou're talking about Marvel's Ant-Man? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Oh, Inside Man's a good movie, I can tell. Inside Man was amazing. But wait, Ant-Man? How is that? Ant-Man 2. Maybe I'm just thinking about Ant-Man 2. That's Ant-Man and the Wasp. No, no, no, no. Yeah, Ant-Man and the Wasp. Yep. The first one, first one, actually, hold on a second. The first one, I haven't seen it in ages. I have to go back. It could also be true about the first one, too, if I think about it. But let me get back to it. You know what's funny, too? Not Ocean's Eleven at all. What they glorify.

Speaker 31And Black Panther does definitely have the Q branch or whatever you'd want to call it with his, I don't know if it's sister or cousin or whatever. That's the tech person. That's a good call out. That's his sister. And last thing I'll say too, I just want to say congratulations to my boy Colin. I just noticed that you got your Purple subscription at the top, bro. Congrats, bro. That's good shit, man. My boy's moving on up. And also my favorite movie of all time definitely is 12 Monkeys with Bruce Willis and Brad Pitt. It came out in 1993. I could watch it like until the end of time.

Speaker 9That was filmed in Philadelphia. And then you get movies nowadays, I mean, it's a great movie, but Wolf of Wall Street, glorifying a fucking Jewish thief that fucking robbed millions of dollars and did drugs 24-7, but I mean, literally the movie's fucking fantastic. What about Catch Me If You Can? And Margot Robbie's so fucking hot. Yeah, Catch Me If You Can. That's good Anglo-Scandinavian genes right there. Yeah, I was going to say, was the character in that movie Jewish?

Ian MalcolmNo, please don't tell me Margot Robbie. There's no way. Margot Robbie? Or Jordan Belfort? No, no, no, not Margot Robbie. Catch me if you can. The character that he portrays. I don't think so. Somebody's got to look that one up. I think I looked into it. I'll look again.

Speaker 9But Jordan Belfort obviously was, and then he gets glorified as this great, gets uplifted as this awesome guy who does drugs and steals money from everyone. And then he's almost portrayed as the victim in a sort of weird way. It is.

Ian MalcolmBut, hey, that's what they do. It is what it is at the end of the day. No, absolutely. And to spread around the love and the microphone, I say we've got J.D. up here. And so, Mr. Washington, I'm going to throw you a curveball. The funniest comedian of the last 50 years, if you had to pick one from the Hollywood humor department, who would it be? George Carlin.

Ian MalcolmYes. You made it too easy with 50 years, Ian. I've got to say, 50 is too easy. All right. We'll go 30. Eddie Murphy. Eddie Murphy. Okay. All right. And the best traditionally masculine hero of the last 25 years would be who? Deez nuts. Norm Macdonald. What?

Speaker 9Classic Twitter X-Base replies. Yes, that's the correct answer. He is the best Holocaust denier. Good job. The way he throws it on his co-hosts with the Holocaust denial. Dude, he is R.I.P. And then the jokes on The View about Bill Clinton and shit. He is just one of the best. And then he came up with... That was tough though, JD. No, I said D's nuts. Yeah, I know, but that was...

@malleusigThat's my... You got a better one? Just in response to the Carlin thing, I will throw Bill Hicks against George Carlin any day of the week. Yeah, that's a bar right there. If you're going stand-up, I might have to give the nod to Chappelle for what it's worth. I find him unbelievable. Chappelle's a machine. He doesn't stop. He just keeps going. He's amazing.

Speaker 32Last 20 years, Chappelle fucking ruled, dude. Chappelle is awesome. I love him to death. He's fucking amazing. Michael McIntyre's hilarious. You know who's overrated as fuck as a comedian? Robin. He sucks at comedian, in my opinion.

Speaker 29He's a much better podcaster. Joe Rogan's a comedian? Yeah, he's the stand-up comedian. He's terrible. I'm just kidding. He's basic. He's not exceptional, but he's Joe Rogan. If it weren't for... Listen, it's his...

@malleusigHe was bigger from the UFC commentating than he was for a stand-up, which is saying something, given how small the fucking UFC was for so long, you know? Now he's telling us he's going to be born by AI. But, like, Keith, the guy in your profile picture, that guy's, one of his most famous roles was in a TV show with Joe Rogan called News Radio. Yeah, yeah. It was a comedy. Oh, yeah, News Radio. With that chick who's smoking hot from Liar Liar. I don't know her name, the actress. Oh, yeah. Smoking hot. She is.

Speaker 29I don't know her name, but... But yeah, he was actually really funny as a comedic actor, but as a stand-up comedian... I'm trying to think of Ian's question, last 25 years, masculine role, it's a good question. Yeah. Yeah, that makes sense for Rogan, you know, a little bit more cerebral, I guess, right, which does a little bit better in these sort of movie roles, I guess, than it does for... I don't know, he's just...

Speaker 29There's something about his stand-up that, I mean, I've heard this from basically everyone, that he just, he sucks at stand-up, so I wonder how he, like, sells any seats. I mean, I guess some people must like him, but, like, his name, I guess, like, can it just do it? Is Bran that powerful? I mean, yeah, I guess at the end of the day, that is true. We'll go see the podcast guy fucking dance around on stage for a little while and tell some jokes. That might just be what it is. If you're famous, if you're famous for anything, people will go see you. Even, just...

@malleusigI mean, people will go to, even if you're famous for a bad reason, it's almost like a circus freak show effect where people pay money just to say they saw you. I agree. So, Rabbi, I have to ask, who would fit into the circus freak show category that you would pay money to go see? Are we getting into Honey Boo Boo territory now? Sorry, I mean Dorian. 25 and has her own show in Vegas or something? I have no idea.

@malleusigHow old is Honey Boo Boo right now? Well, fair enough. And it's funny somebody mentioned Dustin because when he was talking about Black Panther...

Ian MalcolmWell, no, when somebody said Black Panther, I couldn't help, but he often will critique people for believing in Wakanda. I mean, he is good for some laughs, and he throws out some pretty good one-liners, and that's one of the ones I've always kind of enjoyed. There's Dustin 1 and Dustin 2, like the uncensored Colin used to say. Wait, wait, there's Dustin 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Wakanda.

Speaker 9Literally. Uncentered was good at reeling him in for the most part, but then it's just like he can... Oh, my God. I mean, Dustin Nemos, man. I gave him so many benefits off the doubts to now be in his Mossad. He radios the PSYOP and then he wants to come on all the time. Yeah. Literally, I hosted his space. Guess who's requesting? And then it goes into... No, I don't let him up. It goes into the comment section. It's like...

Speaker 9Damn Osat. And I'm like, okay. We all on the map. We all on the map. Keith, are you on the map yet? I got added a couple weeks ago. I'm all by myself. Welcome aboard. I haven't been added. I'm like offended by this. He was at you now. I am now. Just tell him that Jesus is black.

Ian MalcolmAfter today. I think the most recent one you're on it. I got some bad news for Rabbi and Dr. Roshank. You guys are going to be added to the map here. Added to the what? Added to the map is what I was saying. I got blocked by Nick Fuentes Wednesday. So Nick Fuentes

@based__francisgot so upset about me commenting on something. So that's how he does it, I guess. So anyone that says something that's controversial that actually maybe makes some kind of sense, he just blocks them. He just blocks anyone that says anything that might make some sense that he knows he fucked up with, right? No, but you know what I'm saying? You know what I'm saying? He blocked me eight months ago and I was riding his nuts, to be honest. For real? He blocked me two years ago.

@based__francisAnd then the next day, he makes up for the mistake he made the show before just to make himself look based again with his followers. It's insane, dude. Go ahead. Sorry. No, it's a win-win. Someone invite Gen Z up here. We need a... Is he down there? Oh, you're my friend. He's probably got a request in. He might have a request in already. Yeah, we need to get Gen Z up here. I want to know Gen Z, his input about the Epstein talk, the Stalin talk, Gavin Newsom talk. Yeah. Yeah.

Ian MalcolmAll right, so I'm going to go off the Twitter profile here. I'm going to check in with Selena. Hi, Selena. And Selena, the question for you is going to be, of the last 20 years, what is your scariest of the horror movie genre? What is the scariest movie or the genre? Horror. Well, no, no, no. The scariest movie that you would put, well, I guess within the horror genre would be the scariest movie. Exorcist.

Speaker 33Exorcist. Oh, fuck yeah. But no, no, of the last 20 years, because you're going a little outside that time. Oh, gosh. I haven't watched very many movies in the last 20 years, to be honest with you. I'm trying to think. Anything that is as close to could actually happen. That's the scariest kind of movie to me. Anything that I think could possibly really happen. That's scary. Anything that I know is just out of this world, there's no way it'll ever, then I wouldn't believe that. It wouldn't be scary to me.

Ian MalcolmThat seems totally, totally fair. And we're going to come right back to you. I just wanted to say, I put up into the nest a top male actor. What was it? The last 25 years? The best, most masculine hero of the last 25 years. My daughter just said, hang on, what did she say? Evil? Evil Dad Rice. Evil Dad Rice. That's what she thinks.

Ian MalcolmOh, okay. All right. Well, speaking of evil dead rising, according to the Laura Loomers of the world, I think the evil that I put up into the nest, a handle you might recognize, is rising from the proverbial digital dead. So certainly a big shout out to him. I know he's in the listener panel. I want to give a lot of love to him. Make sure to give him a follow. We're going to get him back up in no time. Oh, yeah. He got the handle back. Yeah, mister. Well, apparently...

Ian MalcolmI can't remember exactly the name of it. I don't know if it's a bonobobo. I'm sure Rabbi would know this animal. The bobono or whatever it is. Bonobo? bonobo there you go the type of monkey that the jeffrey x epstein posted it was a bonobo with makeup on holding a comb and his final tweet was laura loomer's getting a lot better with the makeup and then his account got new that might do it sometimes personal insult something something harassment i don't know

Ian MalcolmSo some kudos to him. Put his post up in the nest. Might be worth giving a little check to. Very, very, very funny handle here on X. But to go back to you, Selena. So we got the scary movie out of the way. So here's going to be a curve one since you're of the better gender, let's say. The most romantic movie of the last 20 years. The man that made you swoon due to the storyline or the aesthetics of said masculine man. I love Rope Action, but that's just me.

Ian MalcolmThe Notebook. The Notebook. Ah, The Notebook with Ryan Gosling. Very good choice. He's in a lot of great movies. Romeo and Juliet, that's what the data says. Ah, okay. Now, is that the Leonardo DiCaprio one? The Notebook was 2004. So, uh...

Speaker 29What? Two years outside the window. What about music from another room? I cannot even watch movies like that. EF Notebooks, 2004, Ian. June 25th. Wow. Hey, hey, hey. Listen, guys. Listen, we still look at 2000 like it was not that long ago. It's not 246 years ago. That was 12 years ago. What do you mean? Not really. Not really. Yeah, right.

Ian MalcolmWe're now closer to 2050 than we are to 2000. Imagine that. Stop it. People everywhere in the audience are crying and cringing. So, Brittany, I got to throw this one your way then to follow up on the romantic movies, which we're going to go to. Well, we'll play a little trivia. First and foremost, Brittany, what book sold more copies than the Bible that was then turned into a movie?

Speaker 34I would say The Iliad or something like that, but I'm probably wrong. I'll give you a hint. It's of the trash romantic novel rendition. I wish they made a real version of The Iliad, not Twilight. Probably Twilight. No, I think I know. Romance novels? It's going to be really sad.

Ian MalcolmWe should make an Iliad with AI. Like Anna Karenina or something like that, maybe? I don't know. No! Okay, let's go to the audience in general here. And put in the purple pill if you think you know the answer. What romance novel sold more copies than the Bible? I think it was in a calendar year. Yeah, go for it. I'm guessing it's Fifty Shades of Grey.

Speaker 24It is Fifty Shades of Grey. And you know, I know what's the... No, no, no, no, no. Oh, my God. ChatGPT, that shit real quick. That nigga over here. No, no, no. Let me tell you exactly how I figured it. I'm out to eat. I'm on ChatGPT. That's so disheartening. We're cut, bro. We're cut. The way I figured it is I was like, what's the worst thing that's come out? That's literally all I figured in my head. And it was like, oh, yeah, probably that one. That's probably the worst.

Speaker 17And somebody should fact-check that one, but that's a little fun fact that I heard somewhere along the lines, which brings me to the question, Brittany. With Catchy Petite says, nope, not even close. Well, in the calendar year. Because Fifty Shades of Grey sold 150 million copies worldwide, the Bible is estimated to 5 to 7 billion copies. Well, no, that's in totality, though. We're talking the calendar year. Okay, let me check.

Ian MalcolmYeah, not suggesting that in totality. I'm a per capita and per year kind of guy with my statistics. So, Brittany, the question. In Fifty Shades of Grey, the film, you were pleased, disappointed, or somewhere in the middle with the actor that they chose for that role? I know it was a big hubbub for lots of women because of their fantasy for the book. Can I give you an answer? I never watched either. I never read the book.

Speaker 17Never watched the movie. I just didn't have any desire to participate in either. It just seemed like porno. Based. Do we have the most based audience of all times, gentlemen? And that's not an indication on you, Dr. Roshank. I'm focused on this Bible thing. So the Bible sells 80 to 100 million copies per year globally and Fifty Shades of Grey at its

Speaker 9peak year, which was 2012, sold $15 million. Damn. Sorry, buddy. No, we're going to have to go and we'll try to figure out exactly where the statistic is. Go for it. Tom Hardy in Warrior. It took me a while to think of it. I'm sure many people probably haven't seen it, but if they haven't, then you need to see it. It's a fantastic movie.

Speaker 29But I want to think of another one. I don't know. I don't know. He's got some... His character's got some, like, intrinsic masculine flaws that are a little bit like... He's kind of a bit of a sensitive bitch in some ways. In Warrior? Yeah, in Warrior, in certain ways. You know what I mean? He's kind of like...

Speaker 9he's kind of being a faggot with his dad and his brother and shit. He's kind of being a little bit of, you know what I mean? He's, you know, but I guess by the end, he had that built up thing. Cause, uh, cause the, like, I mean, I understand how jacked he is and shit in the movie and, uh, his ability to work through it.